Before I took a multi-year sabbatical from posting on this blog, I was spending quite a bit of time criticizing fellow blogger Eivind Berge. This caused one of his psychotic Norwegian paedo-sadist Anders Brevik supporting readers to leave the most disgusting and depraved comments here every day – something that partly contributed to my decision to take a break. I will write more on my decision to come back to blogging, but what I don’t want to do is to again have to keep posting on the subject of Eivind Berge. So this article is intended to ‘get it all out’ in one go, and explain the reasons why he has angered me so much.
First of all, I should point out, or rather admit, that I do feel sometimes like I’m almost bullying him by constantly leaving critical comments at his site. This makes me uncomfortable, especially after the suicide of the PUA ‘Johnny Berba‘ recently, whose death affected me quite a bit, and who was subjected to some online ridicule over the years. In fact, one of the reasons I have come back to blogging is that it means I will no longer need to comment at Eivind’s blog – something that I’d rather not do anyway as it is now a bonafide pedo blog. Again though, that’s not to say I want to be criticizing him all the time here either. Having said that, somebody who identifies asa ‘proud paedophile’ clearly has a thick skin, to say the least, so I doubt if my criticisms of him are anything more than an irritation. And, as you will see below, I feel it is my right, or rather my obligation to criticize him, as he sets himself up as the self-annointed ‘leader’ of our non-existant movement. He claims to speak for me, and other long-time activists such as ‘Jack’.
So let’s get to the heart of the matter. There are few people out of the billions on this planet who are speaking out against insane feminist anti-sex laws. I am one of those people. Eivind is one of these people too. And yet, he often forces me to almost hate him. How can this be? Well, this is why.
He literally calls himself ‘leader’ of our ‘movement’. Before that, he believed he had a special power to annoint others as ‘leader’.
There is no ‘movement’, and there is no ‘leader’. A handful of people commenting on his blog (often disagreeing with him) does not make a movement. His principle justification for calling himself a leader appears to be that he is ‘public’, which he is very proud of (and more of that later). Before he decided to annoint himself as the chosen one, he did the same for a potential false flag (or simply clumsy individual) named Tom Grauer (who was more than happy to accept). Our ‘movement’, which appears to consist of a few individuals, seems to attract very egotistical people. I cannot recall the Men’s Rights Movement, which has or did have tens of thousands of followers, ever choosing a ‘leader’. Paul Elam, who was certainly egotistical, may have acted like a leader, but he never called himself one, and I can’t recall more than a handful of MRAs ever claiming that he was. Similarly, the incels have never had a ‘leader’ (although Elliott Rodger may be a kind of ‘saint’ to many of them). For that matter, the gay rights movement, the trans rights movement has never had a ‘leader’. Even the MAPs do not have a ‘leader’.
Eivind’s need to call himself a ‘leader’ appears not just to be ego driven in the sense that he needs validation from ‘followers’, but is perhaps an even more insidiuous and treacherous attempt to get laid with a ‘female fan’ (more below).
Constantly Boasts Of Being ‘Public’, Whilst Chiding Everybody Else For ‘Cowardice’
One of the reasons, or THE reason Eivind thinks he is entitled to call himself a ‘leader’, despite having only one or two readers who see him as such, is because he is public with his activism. He is very proud of this, and constantly chides others for being anonymous. Ironically, the only thing his one, two, or three(?) ‘followers’ have in common is that they refuse to even adopt unique identifying usernames when commenting on his blog. He may only have one ‘follower’ – it’s really impossible to know. But it sure is cringey – like most things about him.
What’s most grating about this proud boast of Eivind is that he seems oblivous to the fact that Norway is one of the few countries, or is perhaps the only country in the world, where ‘public activism’ in this regard is not suicidal. He also appears oblivious to the dangers that such public activism present to himself even in Norway. He was genuinely surprised (and even wrote a blog post on it) to discover that the rare Tinder matches with chubbies he was getting would invariably ghost him after Googling his name and discovering that he was a ‘proud paedophile’ who believed that ‘rape is equality’. He makes videos that potentially give away his location. This mirrors that other paedophile activist ‘Amos Yee’, who was similarly public and then surprised when he got beaten up in a shopping center.
It’s also not clear what benefit being public has brought himself or to any cause of male sexual rights. He claims that it has brought him media exposure. His first real episode of national (and even international) exposure was when he was arrested for threatening to stab police officers on his blog. Note that although he used his real name on his little known blog, his identity would obviously have been revealed had he chosen to blog anonymously, through his arrest and subsequent trial. On the back of this media attention, and many years later, he was invited to take part in a Norwegian documentary on Incels and other ‘angry young online men’. As Eivind was no longer young, and not even so angry, the documentary makers clearly had him on to reassure the public that these angry young men will eventually just turn into harmless middle-aged eccentrics like Eivind. It was clearly a ‘comic light relief’ interval segment. Eivind, dressed in a cardigan on a hot summer’s day, hardly mentioned male sexuality, but was invited to showcase his absurd ‘Fertile Dating’ attempt at a co-parenting matchmaking site, and present it to a panel of business experts (who spent the entire time trying to surpress their laughter).
His next enounter with ‘fame’ remains his proudest moment. After watching his performance on the Incel documentary, a feminist filmmaker read his blog and decided he would make the perfect subject of a black comedy. So she got in touch with Eivind and they met several times to discuss the project – meetings which Eivind proudly refers to as ‘dates’. The film was made, and portrayed Eivind as a mentally ill loner with erectile dysfunction problems, and who finally finds sexual happiness in a sex doll brothel. Nevertheless, Eivind was extremely proud of it, especially when ‘his film’ won a prize at the Cannes Film Festival, with the panel of judges explicitly stating that they giggled throughout the screening. Eivind put down his ‘success’ to his genius move of making YouTube videos naked in his shower whilst praising a man who was jailed for abducting a 12 year old girl.
In tangible benefits, it has maybe brought him 2 or 3 Norwegian readers to his blog, although he/they sometimes claim that they followed him since his original arrest. According to the SEO analysis tool SemRush, his blog has around 5 visitors a day. His YouTube channel, despite being in his real name, has 140 or so subscribers, and his videos only get 2 or 3 likes each.
So it’s not clear at all why there is a benefit to being public. No doubt if he didn’t come across as an autistic weirdo, then he might have a case. Somebody with the looks and charisma of Andrew Tate clearly benefits from being ‘public’. Somebody like Matt Forney, who was far more successful when blogging anonymously as ‘Ferdinand Bardemu (InMalaFide), doesn’t. Eivind certainly doesn’t.
Finally, and most seriously, it appears that being public may have affected his integrity, to say the least. Just as with his ‘coparenting’ site Fertile Dating, he openly admits he wants to get laid through ‘his movement’, the name of which he has single-handedly changed from ‘Male Sexualism’ to just ‘Sexualism’ in order to attract a horny female fan. Despite having low or non-existing standards when it comes to choosing a partner, his only girlfriend in the last 20 years was a female fan called Emma who followed his blog and hooked up with him as a result. He is clearly hoping that lightening will strike twice. Back then, at least he was an angry young man. Emma was an attractive young woman of Slavic origin who would normally be out of Eivind’s league, but who apparently had a fetish for omega males. He claims that he dumped her a few years ago because she didn’t want to have children, probably expecting a new fan would replace her soon enough. It didn’t happen. That hasn’t prevented Eivind from changing the name of the movement, or from refusing to accept that women in general have any responsibility for the present war on male sexuality, in order to make himself attractive to any potential ‘second Emma’.
Accepts The Feminist Paedophile Slander And Is Tactically Clueless
When it comes to tactics, Eivind is like a blind man leading an army into battle. This is a man who is surprised that being public with activism such as claiming that ‘rape is equality’ leads to fewer dating oportunities with the opposite sex. This is a man who thinks that a coparenting website with a HTML school project design and competing with an established site that has 100K+ members, whilst publicly declaring himself a ‘proud paedophile’ and defending the right of a father to sodamize his son, whilst openly stating he himself is looking to get women pregnant through his own site, might actually become the next million dollar tech startup, with investors flooding in. This is a man who thinks that making YouTube videos naked in the shower will get him listened to by ‘serious people’. This is a man who thinks AI is overhyped, who started learning code AFTER ChatGPT in his forties, and who waits earnestly for ‘peak oil’ and the collapse of Industrial Civilization. This is a man who used to mine Bitcoin when it was worth peanuts, and then came to the conclusion it was ‘overhyped’, and sold it all for peanuts, amounts that would have made him a billionaire, and who still thinks he made the right decision. So it’s hardly a surprise that when it comes to formulating tactics for our ‘movement’, the man is a literal imbecile.
Eivind has alienated just about every demographic that we are likely to have any hope of winning to our cause in order to form a base of a real movement. He’s pissed off virtually every MRA with his cringey white knighting obsession with the ‘female sex offender charade’. That is, almost every other article he’s published in the last decade on his blog has been concerned with the latest female teacher to be denied the pussy pass for sucking off 13 year old Tyrone’s BBC in class. He’s pissed off every potential Incel recruit by calling them ‘losers’ (whilst describing himself as an ‘alpha male Chad!’), despite any imbecile seeing that the Incel movement is the obvious place where an anti-feminist male sexual consciousness is emerging. He’s pissed off every one of the millions of potential porn lover recruits by calling them ‘wankers’ over and over again, despite any imbecile realizing that with advances in porn tech, feminists will be ‘forced’ to criminalize ever increasing millions of men.
I can’t recall Eivind making a single practical and useful tactical suggestion in the near 20 years he has been blogging. His only ‘goal’ for the ‘movement’ is to see the collapse of Industrial Civilization, something he believes will follow inevitabily from ‘peak oil’, and which will ‘spite feminists’. Although he mentions feminists a lot and claims to see that they are in some way responsible for sex laws, he refuses to accept any form of ‘Sexual Trade Uninon theory’, ‘green pill’, or ‘pussy cartel’ theories (all much the same), and instead refers to ‘cultural drift’ as an explanation. This may be because he’s genuinely an imbecile, but it’s more likely, as mentioned above, that he simply doesn’t want to blame women lest it reduces his chances of getting laid with a female fan. In any case, any tactical suggestion he has put forward, such as..ahem…’fighting the police’, ‘registering voluntarilly as sex offenders’, ‘breaking sex laws’ etc. would only even make sense if we had at least hundreds of thousands of followers, rather than a handful.
But the most seriously inept and tactical crime of Eivind Berge is his submissive acceptance of the feminist paedophile slander. He now refers to himself as a ‘proud paedophile’. Not even identifying himself as an aspie ‘MAP’ is enough for him. He is a proud paedo. He justifies this on the basis that ‘words mean whatever people say they mean’. Here, he simply demonstrates his place on the spectrum again. Words have numerous shades of meaning, differences in context, differences in the speaker’s intention and even ‘motive’. The word paedophile might be used these days even to describe a man with a 19 year old girlfriend, but it is a case of the original and true meaning of the word – a pervert with a preference for little kids – being exploited by feminists in order to shame normal male sexuality. Eivind can’t see this. It’s as though Martin Luthar King accepted that he was a ‘proud nigger’, or even a ‘proud slave’, because white racists called him it.
Perhaps Tom Grauer, which may or may not be my former identity, dropped out of leading Male Sexualism, as he is now secretly leading Neo-Reaction by posting anonymously on Jim’s Blog.
Oh well, good to see you have moved on to better things 😀 I take it that “Jim’s Blog” is this: https://blog.reaction.la/
I reckon Eivind’s whole anti-fap philosophy is a mask for the fact that he is or has become completely asexual, lacking any real sex drive. He doesn’t even have the urge to masturbate anymore, and fools himself that it’s a conscious decision on his part. The fact that he never travels to have sex is also suspicious, and he makes no attempt to meet women other than supposedly on Tinder, where even by his own admission he enjoys zero success. Because he is asexual, he has lost the ability to discern female beauty, hence his ‘attraction’ towards fat girls.
Good to see your blog back.
You are overly deriding on Eivind though, considering it’s thanks to him I found your blog!
Thanks Jack, good to see you commenting here again. Haha, well it’s good to know Eivind has at least done one thing for us to be grateful for!
Going off of what Jack said, I also found your blog because of Eivind. So whether or not your disagree with him is irrelevant because all of this pointless bickering between you and him is not getting our activism anywhere, really. I applaud both of you for being intelligent, pensive bloggers, but you and him are going to have respectfully disagree and move on because everything right now is just one giant, stalemate chessboard. Put away the disagreement and start compromise on what’s most applicable.
I always try to get the nuance and intellectualism out of everything, but I do agree with the fact that Eivind labeling himself a “proud pedophile” or a “MAP” is going to turn people away because of how weaponized that word has become. Even though we all know that Eivind isn’t a literal pedophile (and he explained his usage of it very well), some people might jump to conclusions. Just look at his Youtube channel. You have people screaming at him in the comments about how “children cannot consent” and that doesn’t seem to give a very good first impression of him. If I was a normie, I would’ve thought that Eivind was a lunatic just waiting for vigilantes to storm through his door. Last thing we want is for Eivind to get cancel cultured before he can explain himself, because apparently no one wants to “hear you out” when you label yourself as a pedophile, as that is the modern equivalent of calling yourself a heretic or a witch.
Hell, I don’t think porn is that bad. I passionately collect Playboy and I still have a very strong drive for women. I just find this whole NoFAP ideology mostly pseudoscientific and unfounded. Most of it isn’t even preached by actual doctors, but by self-help gurus.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/01/1198916105/mens-health-masturbation-abstinence
Thanks for leaving a comment, and you’ll always be welcome here!
To be fair, I think nearly everybody will ‘jump to conclusions’ about Eivind calling himself a paedophile. He admitted recently that even his ‘readers’ barely read his articles but instead come primarily for the comments section. I doubt very much anybody else is going to try to wade through his writings in order to discern his subtle ‘political’ meaning. If Male Sexualism means anything at all it means normal male sexuality. He constantly accuses of us of being ‘wankers’ for occasionally looking at porn and claims we are even ‘asexual’, yet he’s conflating paedophilia with normal male sexuality. It’s the ultimate betrayal, and yet he thinks he’s actually ‘drawing blood’ rather than being a ‘toothless activist’ in meekly accepting the most heinous of feminist slanders like a dog. It’s like Jews claiming that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was all true, because “everybody thinks it is true, so we may as well embrace it”.
Furthermore, my beef with Eivind is always in the context of men’s rights, which we both are supposed to come from. We were always accused of being paedophiles coattailing on the movement when we argued that these issues were valid men’s rights concerns. Now he’s doing his best to confirm that suspicion (whilst being the ‘MAP outreach ambassador to the MRM, lol), AND to make it even worse, his life-long obsession with giving women the pussy pass when it comes to sex with teen boys.
You’re right, we should stop fighting, but it’s best if I ignore him rather than ‘compromise’ with him. Always the best approach when it comes to dealing with somebody with a monumental ego and a massively inflated sense of their own importance. The only reason I visit his blog is because of the comments section to read the likes of yours, Jack’s, Anon69’s and occasionally others make a good point or leave an interesting news link or YouTube video. I’m going to stop doing that to avoid being drawn into another bickering exchange with him, so be sure to post anything interesting you see there here as well. It might take a while for this blog to get popular again (something Eivind typically can’t understand), but for certain it will be getting more readers than his within a couple of months or so.
I understand, but like what Jack said, turn down the volume on criticism against Eivind, because everyone else there seems to accuse of being you a “wanker”. But I don’t know you, so I’m not sure how much of that is true.
Moving on, how do you feel about the anti-porn industry. Remember Gary Wilson and his TED-Talk? IMO, a lot of this anti-porn rhetoric is based on feminist and religious sentimentality, which I presume was obvious to you, with the latter having a disclaimer on TED video that most (if not all) of Gary’s ideas are not backed up by science and other professionals.
“This talk contains several assertions that are not supported by academically respected studies in medicine and psychology. While some viewers might find advice provided in this talk to be helpful, please do not look to this talk for medical advice.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU
Eivind doesn’t usually talk about porn beyond his disdain for it, so how you feel about all of this anti-porn activism going on, like the impact of NoFAP and whatnot? Remember the link I sent you earlier in the previous comment? Are you familiar with that particular article?
@Original Insights – The only reason I’ll turn down my criticism of Eivind is because it’s boring to the likes of you and Jack. Not because he doesn’t deserve it. And for the reason I mentioned earlier – it only feeds his ego.
As far as Gary Wilson is concerned, yes he was definately a feminist stooge, and yes, most of the ‘evidence’ for NoFap is anecodotal ‘bro science’ and a few feminist advocacy research studies. If I remember rightly, Wilson was associated with ‘The Good Men Project’, which Jack and anybody else who followed the MRM will be familiar with. Meanwhile, most of the anti-porn activism going on is led by feminists and religious femiservatives, such as the group that successfully lobbied Visa to cut off Pornhub.
One more reason to admire Andrew Tate is that he doesn’t endorse the NoFap cult.
I think there have been several studies that showed long-term NoFap reduces testosterone. This just seems common sense to me. There must be an evolutionary reason why we are inclined to masturbate after a few days of not having sex. Presumably it’s nature’s way of reminding us how good it feels (I mean, not the masturbation itself, but the fantasizing about sex that accompanies it). Eivind comes across as somebody with very little testosterone or sexual drive. Somebody with high testosterone and sex drive wouldn’t be content to just sit at home generating AI BBWs.
Personally, aside from anything else, I have an enlarged prostate, and as a male in my fifties, I want to avoid prostate cancer, and real science says that having frequent ejaculations helps prostate health. I have been single for a while now, unfortunately, so I combine masturbation with regular trips to ‘massage parlours’.
The following glowing eulogy to Gary Wilson published after his death – that his very Wikipedia page links to – is by none other than NCOSE (The National Center On Sexual Exploitation). I hardly need to explain who they are. For Eivind, somebody like David Ley is an enemy, and somebody backed by the likes of NCOSE is a hero to him.
https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/the-national-center-on-sexual-exploitation-remembers-gary-wilson/
I’m surprised TED even allowed Gary Wilson to talk, but it’s good that the YouTube video at least has a disclaimer.
The psychologist David Ley is the best ‘debunker’ of Wilson, porn addiction, and NoFap that I know of.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201808/science-stopped-believing-in-porn-addiction-you-should-too
I remember Eivind used to harass him on Twitter a lot (despite Ley often daring to criticize the feminist narrative on ‘paedophiles’) and eventually he had enough with the ‘loon’ (Ley’s word) and blocked him. This is what I mean when I say Eivind is probably doing more harm than good – something that should be almost impossible.
Yeah, you’re right. Reading that article was a bit of surprise. I wasn’t expecting so much constant debunking because so many self-proclaimed “experts” out here claim this and that and it is hard to get a clear picture of what is really going on. I’m glad he hit the nail over the coffin and discovered that the shame doesn’t come from pornography, but rather the moral perspective. I’m curious to know if the “moral congruence” plays a big role in iatrogenic harm for so called “abuse and assault victims”, something which Eivind doesn’t hold much faith in, despite the strong social taboos and stigma. Ley reminds of Youtuber I used to occasionally watch about five years ago that went by the name of “The Drunk Reviewer”.
He really dug deep into the anti-porn movement and their hidden agendas and inconsistencies. I remember he was very critical about some groups like Fight The New Drug, Covenant Eyes, the LDS Church, and all that other moralistic stuff like parental controls and NoFAP and whatnot. All lot of the aforementioned groups either had ties to Mormonism or activism from progressive western countries like the UK and Australia, which indeed have a lot of vocal feminists and moral child protection entrepreneurs. The Mormonism especially since a lot it originated from the state of Utah, which the article you showed me, brought up. I’m also sure the idea that porn causes erectile dysfunction is also a myth too and a bullshit one that. I wonder how many teenage boys believe their penises are going to shrive up and peel off because of this nonsense?
As for that Youtuber, I don’t know or at least remember his real name. He did get a lot of flack in the comment section though and people accused him of being a “coomer” and whatnot. Typical remarks, really nothing special.
I would definitely link him here, but his channel has since been deleted and there’s no trace of him left. That was right in the midst of the Pandemic in the summer of 2020 and if I knew that information that I have now, I definitely would’ve saved as many of his videos I possibly could.
As for Eivind, let him be. Homing in to much on him isn’t going to get us anywhere. If his preference isn’t porn, then that’s fine. All I do is switch back and forth between your blog and his to obtain a full understanding of the entire sex panic that getting worse every day. Both are you are very intelligent writers, but let’s just knock it off with the skirmishes between you and him.
At least he agrees that CP and porn laws are terrible. That’s most likely 100% the bulk of most sex offender convictions. CP especially, because I don’t care what people are looking at, just that I don’t think people should be severely punished for looking at an underage photo on their computer. Fuck it, I don’t know about you, but I don’t believe that the possession of CP should even be illegal. We don’t put people into prison for sharing and watching videos of terrorism, do we?
Fun Fact: Up until 1984 in the US, the age of pornographic performance was 16, but it was only raised to 18, not out of exploitation, but because prosecutors were have a difficult time convicting people. Do you see how evil that is? So many lives ruined so that some people build their own careers?
” I wonder how many teenage boys believe their penises are going to shrive up and peel off because of this nonsense?”
Yes, it’s all about teaching boys from an early age that their sexuality is evil, in a very similar way that priests used to tell boys that masturbation would make them go blind.
I’m glad this blog provides an alternative to Eivind – a much needed one I think! If you guys aren’t upset by him calling you ‘wankers’ and ‘cowards’ and the like, and even allowing his cult followers to tell Jack to kill himself, then I guess I shouldn’t get upset myself, at least not now that I am no longer commenting over there, or even reading him.
I wonder if the porn addiction charade is not an attempt by men at setting themselves up as victims. Would a man get a more lenient sentence for sexual abuse if he could establish he was addicted to porn? Maybe in the US he would because US justice – though corrupt – loves technicalities.
I believe watching porn can take a toll on your time if you overdo it, but it can do so just like many other things, like listening to non educational music, reading pulp litterature, watching football on TV, surfing for celebrity gossip etc.
For people learning English as a second language, I guess porn can have a positive impact on vocab learning.
Yes, I think it has actually been used in a sex offender’s defence, along with the equally bogus ‘sex addiction’ charade.
I don’t often look at porn for that very reason. I’m too busy, and you can easily end up clicking and clicking on the next porn tube video for several hours. But as you say, it’s much the same with anything, especially any online activity. I also find I’d much rather wank to the memories of past conquests, as well as those who ‘friendzoned me’, or simply the hot girl I just saw in Lidl dressed like a slut.
Haha, yeah I picked up a fair smattering of German that way back in the day!
Femiservative American writer admits that women can’t compete with AI girlfriends. She even compares it to ‘porn addiction’. Anything that outcompetes women for men’s sexual attention is labeled an ‘addiction’.
https://www.freyaindia.co.uk/p/we-cant-compete-with-ai-girlfriends
Correction: Shrivel up, not “shrive”
Stupid me….
AI is overhyped.
https://theantifeminist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Kling2-Eivind-Berge-Incredible_Hulk.mp4