*Update August 2025: I completely dissociate myself from the paedophile blogger Eivind Berge. I disagree with him over almost everything. I have never had any communication with him other than as a former commentator at his blog (before he came out as a paedophile), and only did so because for a long time he was posing as an MRA who was speaking out on the criminalization of normal male sexuality. I COMPLETELY DISTANCE MYSELF FROM HIS REAL PAEDOPHILIA, HIS COMMENTS ON SEX OFFENDING ETC.
First of all, I should point out, or rather admit, that I do feel sometimes like I’m almost bullying him by constantly leaving critical comments at his site. This makes me uncomfortable, especially after the suicide of the PUA ‘Johnny Berba‘ recently, whose death affected me quite a bit, and who was subjected to some online ridicule over the years. In fact, one of the reasons I have come back to blogging is that it means I will no longer need to comment at Eivind’s blog – something that I’d rather not do anyway as it is now a bonafide pedo blog. Again though, that’s not to say I want to be criticizing him all the time here either. Having said that, somebody who identifies asa ‘proud paedophile’ clearly has a thick skin, to say the least, so I doubt if my criticisms of him are anything more than an irritation. And, as you will see below, I feel it is my right, or rather my obligation to criticize him, as he sets himself up as the self-annointed ‘leader’ of our non-existant movement. He claims to speak for me, and other long-time activists such as ‘Jack’.
So let’s get to the heart of the matter. There are few people out of the billions on this planet who are speaking out against insane feminist anti-sex laws. I am one of those people. Eivind is one of these people too. And yet, he often forces me to almost hate him. How can this be? Well, this is why.
He literally calls himself ‘leader’ of our ‘movement’. Before that, he believed he had a special power to annoint others as ‘leader’.
There is no ‘movement’, and there is no ‘leader’. A handful of people commenting on his blog (often disagreeing with him) does not make a movement. His principle justification for calling himself a leader appears to be that he is ‘public’, which he is very proud of (and more of that later). Before he decided to annoint himself as the chosen one, he did the same for a potential false flag (or simply clumsy individual) named Tom Grauer (who was more than happy to accept). Our ‘movement’, which appears to consist of a few individuals, seems to attract very egotistical people. I cannot recall the Men’s Rights Movement, which has or did have tens of thousands of followers, ever choosing a ‘leader’. Paul Elam, who was certainly egotistical, may have acted like a leader, but he never called himself one, and I can’t recall more than a handful of MRAs ever claiming that he was. Similarly, the incels have never had a ‘leader’ (although Elliott Rodger may be a kind of ‘saint’ to many of them). For that matter, the gay rights movement, the trans rights movement has never had a ‘leader’. Even the MAPs do not have a ‘leader’.
Eivind’s need to call himself a ‘leader’ appears not just to be ego driven in the sense that he needs validation from ‘followers’, but is perhaps an even more insidiuous and treacherous attempt to get laid with a ‘female fan’ (more below).
Constantly Boasts Of Being ‘Public’, Whilst Chiding Everybody Else For ‘Cowardice’
One of the reasons, or THE reason Eivind thinks he is entitled to call himself a ‘leader’, despite having only one or two readers who see him as such, is because he is public with his activism. He is very proud of this, and constantly chides others for being anonymous. Ironically, the only thing his one, two, or three(?) ‘followers’ have in common is that they refuse to even adopt unique identifying usernames when commenting on his blog. He may only have one ‘follower’ – it’s really impossible to know. But it sure is cringey – like most things about him.
What’s most grating about this proud boast of Eivind is that he seems oblivous to the fact that Norway is one of the few countries, or is perhaps the only country in the world, where ‘public activism’ in this regard is not suicidal. He also appears oblivious to the dangers that such public activism present to himself even in Norway. He was genuinely surprised (and even wrote a blog post on it) to discover that the rare Tinder matches with chubbies he was getting would invariably ghost him after Googling his name and discovering that he was a ‘proud paedophile’ who believed that ‘rape is equality’. He makes videos that potentially give away his location. This mirrors that other paedophile activist ‘Amos Yee’, who was similarly public and then surprised when he got beaten up in a shopping center.
It’s also not clear what benefit being public has brought himself or to any cause of male sexual rights. He claims that it has gained him media exposure. His first real episode of national (and even international) exposure was when he was arrested for threatening to stab police officers on his blog. Note that although he used his real name on his little known blog, his identity would obviously have been revealed had he chosen to blog anonymously, through his arrest and subsequent trial. On the back of this media attention, and many years later, he was invited to take part in a Norwegian documentary on Incels and other ‘angry young online men’. As Eivind was no longer young, and not even so angry, the documentary makers clearly had him on to reassure the public that these angry young men will eventually just turn into harmless middle-aged eccentrics like Eivind. It was clearly a ‘comic light relief’ interval segment. Eivind, dressed in a cardigan on a hot summer’s day, hardly mentioned male sexuality, but was invited to showcase his absurd ‘Fertile Dating’ attempt at a co-parenting matchmaking site, and present it to a panel of business experts (who spent the entire time trying to surpress their laughter).
His next enounter with ‘fame’ remains his proudest moment. After watching his performance on the Incel documentary, a feminist filmmaker read his blog and decided he would make the perfect subject of a black comedy. So she got in touch with Eivind and they met several times to discuss the project – meetings which Eivind proudly refers to as ‘dates’. The film was made, and portrayed Eivind as a mentally ill loner with erectile dysfunction problems, and who finally finds sexual happiness in a sex doll brothel. Nevertheless, Eivind was extremely proud of it, especially when ‘his film’ won a prize at the Cannes Film Festival, with the panel of judges explicitly stating that they giggled throughout the screening. Eivind put down his ‘success’ to his genius move of making YouTube videos naked in his shower whilst praising a man who was jailed for abducting a 12 year old girl.
In tangible benefits, it has maybe brought him 2 or 3 Norwegian readers to his blog, although he/they sometimes claim that they followed him since his original arrest. According to the SEO analysis tool SemRush, his blog has around 5 visitors a day. His YouTube channel, despite being in his real name, has 140 or so subscribers, and his videos only get 2 or 3 likes each.
So it’s not clear at all why there is a benefit to being public. No doubt if he didn’t come across as an autistic weirdo, then he might have a case. Somebody with the looks and charisma of Andrew Tate clearly benefits from being ‘public’. Somebody like Matt Forney, who was far more successful when blogging anonymously as ‘Ferdinand Bardemu (InMalaFide), doesn’t. Eivind certainly doesn’t.
Finally, and most seriously, it appears that being public may have affected his integrity, to say the least. Just as with his ‘coparenting’ site Fertile Dating, he openly admits he wants to get laid through ‘his movement’, the name of which he has single-handedly changed from ‘Male Sexualism’ to just ‘Sexualism’ in order to attract a horny female fan. Despite having low or non-existing standards when it comes to choosing a partner, his only girlfriend in the last 20 years was a female fan called Emma who followed his blog and hooked up with him as a result. He is clearly hoping that lightening will strike twice. Back then, at least he was an angry young man. Emma was an attractive young woman of Slavic origin who would normally be out of Eivind’s league, but who apparently had a fetish for omega males. He claims that he dumped her a few years ago because she didn’t want to have children, probably expecting a new fan would replace her soon enough. It didn’t happen. That hasn’t prevented Eivind from changing the name of the movement, or from refusing to accept that women in general have any responsibility for the present war on male sexuality, in order to make himself attractive to any potential ‘second Emma’.
Accepts The Feminist Paedophile Slander And Is Tactically Clueless
When it comes to tactics, Eivind is like a blind man leading an army into battle. This is a man who is surprised that being public with activism such as claiming that ‘rape is equality’ leads to fewer dating oportunities with the opposite sex. This is a man who thinks that a coparenting website with a HTML school project design and competing with an established site that has 100K+ members, whilst publicly declaring himself a ‘proud paedophile’ and defending the right of a father to sodamize his son, whilst openly stating he himself is looking to get women pregnant through his own site, might actually become the next million dollar tech startup, with investors flooding in. This is a man who thinks that making YouTube videos naked in the shower will get him listened to by ‘serious people’. This is a man who thinks AI is overhyped, who started learning code AFTER ChatGPT in his forties, and who waits earnestly for ‘peak oil’ and the collapse of Industrial Civilization. This is a man who used to mine Bitcoin when it was worth peanuts, and then came to the conclusion it was ‘overhyped’, and sold it all for peanuts, amounts that would have made him a billionaire, and who still thinks he made the right decision. So it’s hardly a surprise that when it comes to formulating tactics for our ‘movement’, the man is a literal imbecile.
Eivind has alienated just about every demographic that we are likely to have any hope of winning to our cause in order to form a base of a real movement. He’s pissed off virtually every MRA with his cringey white knighting obsession with the ‘female sex offender charade’. That is, almost every other article he’s published in the last decade on his blog has been concerned with the latest female teacher to be denied the pussy pass for sucking off 13 year old Tyrone’s BBC in class. He’s pissed off every potential Incel recruit by calling them ‘losers’ (whilst describing himself as an ‘alpha male Chad!’), despite any imbecile seeing that the Incel movement is the obvious place where an anti-feminist male sexual consciousness is emerging. He’s pissed off every one of the millions of potential porn lover recruits by calling them ‘wankers’ over and over again, despite any imbecile realizing that with advances in porn tech, feminists will be ‘forced’ to criminalize ever increasing millions of men.
I can’t recall Eivind making a single practical and useful tactical suggestion in the near 20 years he has been blogging. His only ‘goal’ for the ‘movement’ is to see the collapse of Industrial Civilization, something he believes will follow inevitabily from ‘peak oil’, and which will ‘spite feminists’. Although he mentions feminists a lot and claims to see that they are in some way responsible for sex laws, he refuses to accept any form of ‘Sexual Trade Union theory’, ‘green pill’, or ‘pussy cartel’ theories (all much the same), and instead refers to ‘cultural drift’ as an explanation. This may be because he’s genuinely an imbecile, but it’s more likely, as mentioned above, that he simply doesn’t want to blame women lest it reduces his chances of getting laid with a female fan. In any case, any tactical suggestion he has put forward, such as..ahem…’fighting the police’, ‘registering voluntarily as sex offenders’, ‘breaking sex laws’ etc. would only even make sense if we had at least hundreds of thousands of followers, rather than a handful.
But the most seriously inept and tactical crime of Eivind Berge is his submissive acceptance of the feminist paedophile slander. He now refers to himself as a ‘proud paedophile’. Not even identifying himself as an aspie ‘MAP’ is enough for him. He is a proud paedo. He justifies this on the basis that ‘words mean whatever people say they mean’. Here, he simply demonstrates his place on the spectrum again. Words have numerous shades of meaning, differences in context, differences in the speaker’s intention and even ‘motive’. The word paedophile might be used these days even to describe a man with a 19 year old girlfriend, but it is a case of the original and true meaning of the word – a pervert with a preference for little kids – being exploited by feminists in order to shame normal male sexuality. Eivind can’t see this. It’s as though Martin Luthar King accepted that he was a ‘proud nigger’, or even a ‘proud slave’, because white racists called him it.
Perhaps Tom Grauer, which may or may not be my former identity, dropped out of leading Male Sexualism, as he is now secretly leading Neo-Reaction by posting anonymously on Jim’s Blog.
Oh well, good to see you have moved on to better things 😀 I take it that “Jim’s Blog” is this: https://blog.reaction.la/
I reckon Eivind’s whole anti-fap philosophy is a mask for the fact that he is or has become completely asexual, lacking any real sex drive. He doesn’t even have the urge to masturbate anymore, and fools himself that it’s a conscious decision on his part. The fact that he never travels to have sex is also suspicious, and he makes no attempt to meet women other than supposedly on Tinder, where even by his own admission he enjoys zero success. Because he is asexual, he has lost the ability to discern female beauty, hence his ‘attraction’ towards fat girls.
Good to see your blog back.
You are overly deriding on Eivind though, considering it’s thanks to him I found your blog!
Thanks Jack, good to see you commenting here again. Haha, well it’s good to know Eivind has at least done one thing for us to be grateful for!
Going off of what Jack said, I also found your blog because of Eivind. So whether or not your disagree with him is irrelevant because all of this pointless bickering between you and him is not getting our activism anywhere, really. I applaud both of you for being intelligent, pensive bloggers, but you and him are going to have respectfully disagree and move on because everything right now is just one giant, stalemate chessboard. Put away the disagreement and start compromise on what’s most applicable.
I always try to get the nuance and intellectualism out of everything, but I do agree with the fact that Eivind labeling himself a “proud pedophile” or a “MAP” is going to turn people away because of how weaponized that word has become. Even though we all know that Eivind isn’t a literal pedophile (and he explained his usage of it very well), some people might jump to conclusions. Just look at his Youtube channel. You have people screaming at him in the comments about how “children cannot consent” and that doesn’t seem to give a very good first impression of him. If I was a normie, I would’ve thought that Eivind was a lunatic just waiting for vigilantes to storm through his door. Last thing we want is for Eivind to get cancel cultured before he can explain himself, because apparently no one wants to “hear you out” when you label yourself as a pedophile, as that is the modern equivalent of calling yourself a heretic or a witch.
Hell, I don’t think porn is that bad. I passionately collect Playboy and I still have a very strong drive for women. I just find this whole NoFAP ideology mostly pseudoscientific and unfounded. Most of it isn’t even preached by actual doctors, but by self-help gurus.
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/01/1198916105/mens-health-masturbation-abstinence
Thanks for leaving a comment, and you’ll always be welcome here!
To be fair, I think nearly everybody will ‘jump to conclusions’ about Eivind calling himself a paedophile. He admitted recently that even his ‘readers’ barely read his articles but instead come primarily for the comments section. I doubt very much anybody else is going to try to wade through his writings in order to discern his subtle ‘political’ meaning. If Male Sexualism means anything at all it means normal male sexuality. He constantly accuses of us of being ‘wankers’ for occasionally looking at porn and claims we are even ‘asexual’, yet he’s conflating paedophilia with normal male sexuality. It’s the ultimate betrayal, and yet he thinks he’s actually ‘drawing blood’ rather than being a ‘toothless activist’ in meekly accepting the most heinous of feminist slanders like a dog. It’s like Jews claiming that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was all true, because “everybody thinks it is true, so we may as well embrace it”.
Furthermore, my beef with Eivind is always in the context of men’s rights, which we both are supposed to come from. We were always accused of being paedophiles coattailing on the movement when we argued that these issues were valid men’s rights concerns. Now he’s doing his best to confirm that suspicion (whilst being the ‘MAP outreach ambassador to the MRM, lol), AND to make it even worse, his life-long obsession with giving women the pussy pass when it comes to sex with teen boys.
You’re right, we should stop fighting, but it’s best if I ignore him rather than ‘compromise’ with him. Always the best approach when it comes to dealing with somebody with a monumental ego and a massively inflated sense of their own importance. The only reason I visit his blog is because of the comments section to read the likes of yours, Jack’s, Anon69’s and occasionally others make a good point or leave an interesting news link or YouTube video. I’m going to stop doing that to avoid being drawn into another bickering exchange with him, so be sure to post anything interesting you see there here as well. It might take a while for this blog to get popular again (something Eivind typically can’t understand), but for certain it will be getting more readers than his within a couple of months or so.
I understand, but like what Jack said, turn down the volume on criticism against Eivind, because everyone else there seems to accuse of being you a “wanker”. But I don’t know you, so I’m not sure how much of that is true.
Moving on, how do you feel about the anti-porn industry. Remember Gary Wilson and his TED-Talk? IMO, a lot of this anti-porn rhetoric is based on feminist and religious sentimentality, which I presume was obvious to you, with the latter having a disclaimer on TED video that most (if not all) of Gary’s ideas are not backed up by science and other professionals.
“This talk contains several assertions that are not supported by academically respected studies in medicine and psychology. While some viewers might find advice provided in this talk to be helpful, please do not look to this talk for medical advice.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU
Eivind doesn’t usually talk about porn beyond his disdain for it, so how you feel about all of this anti-porn activism going on, like the impact of NoFAP and whatnot? Remember the link I sent you earlier in the previous comment? Are you familiar with that particular article?
@Original Insights – The only reason I’ll turn down my criticism of Eivind is because it’s boring to the likes of you and Jack. Not because he doesn’t deserve it. And for the reason I mentioned earlier – it only feeds his ego.
As far as Gary Wilson is concerned, yes he was definately a feminist stooge, and yes, most of the ‘evidence’ for NoFap is anecodotal ‘bro science’ and a few feminist advocacy research studies. If I remember rightly, Wilson was associated with ‘The Good Men Project’, which Jack and anybody else who followed the MRM will be familiar with. Meanwhile, most of the anti-porn activism going on is led by feminists and religious femiservatives, such as the group that successfully lobbied Visa to cut off Pornhub.
One more reason to admire Andrew Tate is that he doesn’t endorse the NoFap cult.
I think there have been several studies that showed long-term NoFap reduces testosterone. This just seems common sense to me. There must be an evolutionary reason why we are inclined to masturbate after a few days of not having sex. Presumably it’s nature’s way of reminding us how good it feels (I mean, not the masturbation itself, but the fantasizing about sex that accompanies it). Eivind comes across as somebody with very little testosterone or sexual drive. Somebody with high testosterone and sex drive wouldn’t be content to just sit at home generating AI BBWs.
Personally, aside from anything else, I have an enlarged prostate, and as a male in my fifties, I want to avoid prostate cancer, and real science says that having frequent ejaculations helps prostate health. I have been single for a while now, unfortunately, so I combine masturbation with regular trips to ‘massage parlours’.
The following glowing eulogy to Gary Wilson published after his death – that his very Wikipedia page links to – is by none other than NCOSE (The National Center On Sexual Exploitation). I hardly need to explain who they are. For Eivind, somebody like David Ley is an enemy, and somebody backed by the likes of NCOSE is a hero to him.
https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/the-national-center-on-sexual-exploitation-remembers-gary-wilson/
I’m surprised TED even allowed Gary Wilson to talk, but it’s good that the YouTube video at least has a disclaimer.
The psychologist David Ley is the best ‘debunker’ of Wilson, porn addiction, and NoFap that I know of.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201808/science-stopped-believing-in-porn-addiction-you-should-too
I remember Eivind used to harass him on Twitter a lot (despite Ley often daring to criticize the feminist narrative on ‘paedophiles’) and eventually he had enough with the ‘loon’ (Ley’s word) and blocked him. This is what I mean when I say Eivind is probably doing more harm than good – something that should be almost impossible.
Yeah, you’re right. Reading that article was a bit of surprise. I wasn’t expecting so much constant debunking because so many self-proclaimed “experts” out here claim this and that and it is hard to get a clear picture of what is really going on. I’m glad he hit the nail over the coffin and discovered that the shame doesn’t come from pornography, but rather the moral perspective. I’m curious to know if the “moral congruence” plays a big role in iatrogenic harm for so called “abuse and assault victims”, something which Eivind doesn’t hold much faith in, despite the strong social taboos and stigma. Ley reminds of Youtuber I used to occasionally watch about five years ago that went by the name of “The Drunk Reviewer”.
He really dug deep into the anti-porn movement and their hidden agendas and inconsistencies. I remember he was very critical about some groups like Fight The New Drug, Covenant Eyes, the LDS Church, and all that other moralistic stuff like parental controls and NoFAP and whatnot. All lot of the aforementioned groups either had ties to Mormonism or activism from progressive western countries like the UK and Australia, which indeed have a lot of vocal feminists and moral child protection entrepreneurs. The Mormonism especially since a lot it originated from the state of Utah, which the article you showed me, brought up. I’m also sure the idea that porn causes erectile dysfunction is also a myth too and a bullshit one that. I wonder how many teenage boys believe their penises are going to shrive up and peel off because of this nonsense?
As for that Youtuber, I don’t know or at least remember his real name. He did get a lot of flack in the comment section though and people accused him of being a “coomer” and whatnot. Typical remarks, really nothing special.
I would definitely link him here, but his channel has since been deleted and there’s no trace of him left. That was right in the midst of the Pandemic in the summer of 2020 and if I knew that information that I have now, I definitely would’ve saved as many of his videos I possibly could.
As for Eivind, let him be. Homing in to much on him isn’t going to get us anywhere. If his preference isn’t porn, then that’s fine. All I do is switch back and forth between your blog and his to obtain a full understanding of the entire sex panic that getting worse every day. Both are you are very intelligent writers, but let’s just knock it off with the skirmishes between you and him.
At least he agrees that CP and porn laws are terrible. That’s most likely 100% the bulk of most sex offender convictions. CP especially, because I don’t care what people are looking at, just that I don’t think people should be severely punished for looking at an underage photo on their computer. Fuck it, I don’t know about you, but I don’t believe that the possession of CP should even be illegal. We don’t put people into prison for sharing and watching videos of terrorism, do we?
Fun Fact: Up until 1984 in the US, the age of pornographic performance was 16, but it was only raised to 18, not out of exploitation, but because prosecutors were have a difficult time convicting people. Do you see how evil that is? So many lives ruined so that some people build their own careers?
” I wonder how many teenage boys believe their penises are going to shrive up and peel off because of this nonsense?”
Yes, it’s all about teaching boys from an early age that their sexuality is evil, in a very similar way that priests used to tell boys that masturbation would make them go blind.
I’m glad this blog provides an alternative to Eivind – a much needed one I think! If you guys aren’t upset by him calling you ‘wankers’ and ‘cowards’ and the like, and even allowing his cult followers to tell Jack to kill himself, then I guess I shouldn’t get upset myself, at least not now that I am no longer commenting over there, or even reading him.
I wonder if the porn addiction charade is not an attempt by men at setting themselves up as victims. Would a man get a more lenient sentence for sexual abuse if he could establish he was addicted to porn? Maybe in the US he would because US justice – though corrupt – loves technicalities.
I believe watching porn can take a toll on your time if you overdo it, but it can do so just like many other things, like listening to non educational music, reading pulp litterature, watching football on TV, surfing for celebrity gossip etc.
For people learning English as a second language, I guess porn can have a positive impact on vocab learning.
Yes, I think it has actually been used in a sex offender’s defence, along with the equally bogus ‘sex addiction’ charade.
I don’t often look at porn for that very reason. I’m too busy, and you can easily end up clicking and clicking on the next porn tube video for several hours. But as you say, it’s much the same with anything, especially any online activity. I also find I’d much rather wank to the memories of past conquests, as well as those who ‘friendzoned me’, or simply the hot girl I just saw in Lidl dressed like a slut.
Haha, yeah I picked up a fair smattering of German that way back in the day!
Femiservative American writer admits that women can’t compete with AI girlfriends. She even compares it to ‘porn addiction’. Anything that outcompetes women for men’s sexual attention is labeled an ‘addiction’.
https://www.freyaindia.co.uk/p/we-cant-compete-with-ai-girlfriends
Correction: Shrivel up, not “shrive”
Stupid me….
AI is overhyped.
https://theantifeminist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Kling2-Eivind-Berge-Incredible_Hulk.mp4
‘Over-hyped’ AI already hitting the graduate job market: https://futurism.com/signs-ai-bite-job-market
CrowdStrike announces 5% job cuts due to AI: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/07/crowdstrike-announces-5percent-job-cuts-says-ai-reshaping-every-industry.html
Sofware development openings falling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QPf-9El_2s
I see Eivind is having a bit of an existential crisis over at his blog. Actually, his latest article is his best for a while: https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2025/05/the-phenomenology-of-not-being-normie.html
He’s asking in his comments whether I’ve ‘won over’ any new followers since I returned. After 20 years of blogging and even trying to create a successful commerical website, Eivind doesn’t seem to understand the concept of SEO at all, or that it will take time for me to get any decent traffic again. It doesn’t help, of course, that most of the old manosphere aggregators that used to send me a lot of visitors have gone. And any article of mine (or his) posted on Reddit or some other social media would just get deleted.
Eivind should be asking himself why even the MAPs appear to be ignoring him (despite his ‘official’ role).
Why isn’t anybody getting fired up about fighting ‘cultural drift’? Why aren’t MRAs flocking to fight the ‘female sex offender charade’? Well, if Eivind hasn’t worked it out yet, he never will.
We need to promote the idea of ‘Male Sexualism’ (although I’d rather Eivind just sticks to his ‘Sexualist’ movement) I have a few ideas that I’ll discuss in an article soon.
Eivind has a point in that it’s difficult to change people’s opinion. And yet he now tries to appeal only to the single-issue MAPs (who still ignore him), and actively turns off the demographics who do agree with a lot of what we say (such as incels and porn lovers).
Hey, I just replied to your comment on my blog.
Thanks Original Insights, and a very good response it is too! Look forward to seeing you post some more stuff there.
Eivind’s new comment: “I gather that the AF isn’t faring any better with his restarted blog either, just some old commenters reappearing. He thinks “SEO” is going to help him out but I doubt it because the rules have changed. Searching the Internet is not what it used to be now that AI is increasingly inserting itself between the user and the content.”
Wait there – wasn’t Eivind just saying 3 or 4 weeks ago that AI was ‘over-hyped’ and wasn’t even going to take anybody’s job (and was still hoping for a new career in coding. Hope he masters Python before peak oil arrives, lol)?
AI will always ‘rank’ some sites higher and more ‘authoritative’ than others and likely use similar algorithms to do so as Google already does.
How the F*** does he expect new converts to suddenly start showing up on my blog just a month or so after I brought it back online, when it gets virtually no traffic from other sites and still isn’t ranked by Google yet?
Not that I really want dozens of new converts here, with a hundred comments to moderate every day and the like – I couldn’ t stand the stress. The point of this is really to a/ give AI something to chew on b/ inspire others, who will hopefully set up their own blogs or do some other form of online activism, and c/ give commentators like Jack and Anon69 an alternative to Eivind and a rest from being called wankers or from being told by paedophiles to kill themselves.
This is because I have no wish to be a ‘leader’, rather to inspire and motivate others to activism.
Since we’ve been on the topic of health, epsom salt sitz baths should work great for prostate issues – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2991573/
Thanks anon69, I’ll give that a try. A nice wank followed by an epsom salt bath – sounds good!
Eivind and his fellow white knight paedophiles screaming outrage again over yet another female teacher stunned that she didn’t receive the pussy pass:
“the “equal injustice for all” approach, still popular with MRAs like the Antifeminist, does not work. While the pussy pass may still be effective on occasion, we now have decades of evidence that highly significant systematic and often incredibly draconian antisexual persecution of women does NOTHING to turn women against the sex laws.”
First of all, the weirdo was saying just the other week that the fact that the Daily Mail was sympathetic to one such teacher was ‘proof’ that the entire anti-sex hysteria was crumbling and that it was therefore right to focus on these relatively few cases (to the exclusion of hundreds of men getting convicted every day to be bullied or even raped in prison).
What is it to be? Women not getting the pussy pass in female sex offender cases does nothing to change sex laws…so why focus on it? He’s just admitting that his sole reason in cringely obsessing over the ‘female sex offender charade’ is because it’s pure white knighting on his part.
As for me, the ‘equal injustice for all’ phrase was created by myself to highlight the fact that MRAs do not care about changing feminist sex laws that target men, so long as women get treated the same when they break them.
I couldn’t give a shit about a handful of women, because I’m a (real) MRA, fighting for the millions of men targetted and persecuted by feminist sexual trade union anti-male sex laws.
Just like Anwar didn’t give a shit about the right of Jews to own beach front mansions in Gaza.
“Drawing blood with every word”. God help Eivind and the pedo rationalists.
Eivind again: “I guess he thinks he can harness incel rage and that kind of male frustrated feeling that the feminists are the enemy that way. But I don’t see that working even on his own blog. Where are all the men who are supposed to be receptive to that approach?”
I mean really. My blog has been back online for a couple of months after 5 years away. It’s only just starting to get noticed by Google. What part of that can’t his mind understand? Does he think that incels are suddenly going to hear voices in their heads – “the antifeminist has a blog and he want you to join his campaign against feminist sex laws!”?
I used to get over a 1,000 visitors a day here and dozens of supportive commentators, whereas even when Eivind was at his most ‘popular’, most of his comments were from trolls and haters.
He’s been doing this non-stop for 20 years, had national and even international exposure, allowed a feminist to make a Cannes award winning black comedy taking the piss out of him, officially made ‘MAP’ amabassador to the MRM in the hope his female sex offender pussy pass obession will entice MRAs to become MAPs,…
..and he has at most 6 or 7 readers, and maybe 2 or 3 ‘followers’ who can’t even adopt unique usernames, and who all appear to be mentally retarded weirdos and/or psychopaths.
Eivind still non-plussed as to why I haven’t had hundreds of new commentators appearing out of thin air 2 or 3 months since I came back online:
“It can’t be done anymore no matter how hard we try. It’s not a matter of tactics either. I think we can lay to rest the idea that I would have done better if I had followed his copious amounts of unsolicited advice over the years and not stood up for female sex offenders or promoted nofap or favored cultural drift as an explanation over female sexual trade union theory, because he does not even seem to have a slow trickle of new followers, just the hard core reappearing and you.”
The only traffic I’ve received in the last 3 months is from the links posted on his site, perhaps 20 visits from the handful of old manosphere sites that still exist that linked to me, and around 20 search engine visits – most of which land on 404 error pages as the original pages no longer exist.
So from maybe 70-80 visits, half-of-which are from his own blog, he’s taking the fact that I haven’t attracted any new commentators as evidence that hs 20 year obsession with white knighting for female sex offenders, making naked YouTube videos, ranting about wankers whilst generating AI BBWs in his little cabin, calling incels losers when he’s had 1 or 2 Tinder chubbies in the last 10 years etc. was completely the right approach.
For somebody who claims to follow Alan Watts, the guy has a monumental ego that can’t accept it is ever wrong. Just as any idiot (I mean that literally) can see that his ‘Fertile Dating’ site failure was 100% his own fault down to his complete and utter lack of social intelligence (such as thinking investors would put money into it with the ‘CEO’ calling himself a proud paedophile and defending father’s rights to incestuous sodomy), any idiot can see that the failure with regards anti-sex hysteria blogging is 100% his own fault.
I had over 1K visitors a day. I was linked to by the father of the men’s rights movement. Paul Elam wanted me to help him set up A Voice for Men. I had people building Facebook pages, websites and other blogs inspired by this site. The ‘Sexual Trade Union’ idea was bascially listed as one of the handful of most dangerous ideas on the Internet by the Department of Homeland Security (no mention of the female sex offender charade). My ‘aggressive’ approach rather than the ‘pedo rational’ approach has been proven utterly correct by the rise of the ‘toxic influencers’ and the likes of the incels. In fact, just compare the impact of the incels with the MAPs. That pretty much sums it up. The MAPs are seen as a joke, the modern version of NAMBLA, whilst the incels absolutely terrify the feminist and normie establishment.
Eivind’s main boast is that he helped a feminist further her career with an ‘award winning Cannes comedy’ that portrayed him as a mentally ill lonely weirdo with erectile dysfunction problems and who finds salvation in a sex doll brothel.
It’s as though Sinwar, the Hamas leader who Eivind sees as a ‘role model’, not only campaigned almost exclusively for the right of rich Jews to purchase beachfront mansions on Gaza, but boasted of his success in leading Palestinian resistance by the fact that a Jewish director made a film portraying him as a mentally ill alcoholic pig.
If I got to 10% of what was needed to kickstart a movement, then Eivind reached less than 1%.
And to those of you who think this is all irrelevant and I need to chill out and stop bothering with Eivind, well this is important to me. I want to change things. I’m not doing this to get laid with a ‘female sexualist fan’.
Over-hyped AI part 537: https://x.com/minchoi/status/1925387367806115943
Over-hyped AI: https://venturebeat.com/ai/anthropic-claude-opus-4-can-code-for-7-hours-straight-and-its-about-to-change-how-we-work-with-ai/
“Anthropic released Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4 today, dramatically raising the bar for what AI can accomplish without human intervention.
The company’s flagship Opus 4 model maintained focus on a complex open-source refactoring project for nearly seven hours during testing at Rakuten — a breakthrough that transforms AI from a quick-response tool into a genuine collaborator capable of tackling day-long projects.
This marathon performance marks a quantum leap beyond the minutes-long attention spans of previous AI models. The technological implications are profound: AI systems can now handle complex software engineering projects from conception to completion, maintaining context and focus throughout an entire workday.”
Definitely not coming for anybody’s job then, lol.
So in the last 10 days we’ve had:
Google release AlphaEvolve – the first AI to self-improve its own algorithms and performance, and which has already solved decades old mathematical problems.
Google release Veo 3 – photo-realistic AI video generation with sound and voice.
Anthropic release Claude Opus 4 – Agentic AI that can work independently on projects for a complete working day.
AI progress is slowing down…
“Anthropic faces backlash to Claude 4 Opus behavior that contacts authorities, press if it thinks you’re doing something ‘egregiously immoral’”
https://venturebeat.com/ai/anthropic-faces-backlash-to-claude-4-opus-behavior-that-contacts-authorities-press-if-it-thinks-youre-doing-something-immoral/
I wonder if it contacts the authorities if you simply ask it whether the age of consent should be lower?
Whatever you do, don’t show Eivind the latest video from British pop singer ‘Lola Young’. His 6 year NoFap streak would surely come to an end! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV9SOv_Y61s
Women dressing up as schoolgirls (especially fat women) is the most disgusting form of sexual appropriation possible. Yeah, that’s another Male Sexualist meme for you – “sexual appropriation”.
She probably thinks that ‘paedophiles’ should be cut into tiny pieces.
“AI is over-hyped and wont take any jobs.” (Eivind Berge – April 2025)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSVpn_5_QQs
https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/ai-jobs-white-collar-unemployment-anthropic
https://futurism.com/computer-science-majors-high-unemployment-rate
Eivind is now officially declaring himself the ‘sexual prophet’ of a paedophile religion. It’s good he’s no longer hiding his delusion or the fact that his public activism amounts to trying to get laid with female cult followers. Sadly, just as ‘FertileDating.com’ attracted only a couple of sex starved males and zero females in a decade, this venture will go the same way – to be frank, as any sane person could see. Perhaps it will attract some thirsty pedocels, but even less likely to win over any females (except perhaps, an undercover female cop).
I guess the point of the cult is to worship Eivind’s Ego, but if he decides to worship any ‘goddesses’ they will likely be something like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_figurine#/media/File:Wien_NHM_Venus_von_Willendorf.jpg
Eivind should check this out: https://www.dagbladet.no/tema/bergens-hemmelige-klubb-se-bildene/83187833
Eivind and the pedomaps white knighting again for a hot woman teacher.
https://nypost.com/2025/06/17/us-news/husband-of-teacher-christina-formella-stands-by-her-as-she-faces-new-accusations-of-grooming-student-having-sex-with-him-45-times/
Some things worth nothing about this:
1/ The boy (I would bet my life black) was a special needs pupil.
2/ Her husband is standing by her, even though she was texting the boy while she was on vacation with her hubby, promising the boy that she would leave her husband for him. Compare with the way wives invariably ditch their husbands whenever they are caught with so much as a teen bikini pic.
3/ Virtually all the comments underneath the article are ‘lucky boy’.
4/ For every female sex offender case that makes the news, there are at least 1,000 men being caged that only get a brief snippet in their local news, with not a shred of sympathy or humanity.
5/ She is not going to be jailed for 60 years, we all know that. She will probably get 2 or 3 years max. And she will be fully accepted in her cushy female prison. Compare with the treatment male sex offenders get in prison.
If she’s clever she will contact a publisher in order to sell her story.
Don’t know why you keep referring to nearly each and every conversation between me and Eivind as “Eivind and the pedomaps”, when it’s clearly just me (who is obviously not a map and has stated so numerous times) and him. I haven’t heard anyone in his blog in the last six months since I’ve been there, label themselves as a “map” or a “pedo”, aside from Eivind himself.
So what exactly are you saying here, and who are the ‘MRAs’ you are referring to?
“It seems like every day the laws are becoming less and less sympathetic to the plights of female sex offenders. That should be a concern among everyone, including the MRAs who continue gloss over the male and female systematic gender disparities. Everyone gets fucked around by them. The truth is not so straightforward. It’s bleaks and it’s only gonna get worse from here. It will never end and it will go on and on. We are the only defenders left on the planet.”
What do you mean by ‘systematic gender disparities’? 99% of people sent to prison under sex laws are men, and those sex laws were lobbied for by activists who were composed of at least 90% women. Is that not a ‘systematic gender disparity’ that Eivind’s pedomap movement should be concerned about, or at least acknowledge?
Also two further questions:
Why should it be a concern of mine that a woman who felt she would get the pussy pass for banging a 15 year old special needs pupil, in fact didn’t (although we still don’t know what sentence she will receive)? Because she’s pretty? That’s the only reason she’s even in the news. There were probably at least 100, maybe 1,000 men in court the same day in the USA for ‘sex offences’, and the reason her story has gone viral and none of theirs has, is because she’s a woman and she’s quite hot. But again, WTF should I care, and why are you highlighting it and making the absurd claim that her case shows women are as affected by anti-sex laws as men are?
Are you aware that Eivind whitekinighted quite recently for a female sex offender who had actually posted online many times her opinion that (male) ‘paedophiles’ like him should be tortured and cut into tiny pieces? Do you agree with that? is that case another example of these laws ‘fucking up everybody’?
A bonus question: why do you think none of Eivind’s commentators are female? Possibly his former girlfriend (Emma the Emu) may have been the only female to ever comment there (at least a ‘positive’ comentator) in 20 years. I mean, Eivind spends more time championing the cause of female sex offenders than men, so doesn’t it strike you as odd that his blog doesn’t attract female commentators complaining about anti-sex laws that ‘fuck around everyone’? Really, there should be more women there than men.
Yes, there are some good women who speak out (elsewhere) such as Elizabeth Nolan Brown, and they should certainly be applauded. But I wonder if a male editor of Reason magazine could even speak out against the trafficking hoax, and not get cancelled? Similar with Judith Levine. A man could probably not have a chance in hell of getting a book arguing against the age of consent published. Really, the question is why are there so few Elizabeth Nolan Browns and Judith Levines? (And the answer is pretty obvious – these laws do not ‘fuck around everyone’. Just the opposite. They criminalize and fuck men up in the tens or hundreds of millions. Maybe 50 = 100 female sex offenders get hurt by them (and occasionally they are soooo pwettty), but they benefit tens or hundreds of millions of women. You’re fooling yourself if you can’t see this.
“A man could probably not have a chance in hell of getting a book arguing against the age of consent published.”
This may be true for the AOC, but I’m surprised to find quite a number of books when searching for “the trafficking myth” on Amazon. I’m not sure this is encouraging, for it may mean that even with many educated people speaking out against it, a malevolent myth such as the trafficking myth stands unshakable.
I’ll have to look for them Jack. I’m going to post a recommended reading list sometime soon.
Regarding it not making any difference educated people speaking out, well we both know why that is. Because none of this has to do with reason, or ‘cultural drift’, or ‘feminists just gone a little too far’.
Evind, Original Insights, and all the other ‘rationalists’ who’ve been trying the same thing for 50 years, think that if only the feminist directors of the NSPCC would read Professor Wolfbanger’s 1982 analysis of 1,000 German teens who had sex with older partners, then they would realize that all this paedohysteria nonsense has gone too far, and would stop promoting it, and maybe even call for a reduction in the age of consent.
Because all they really want is to protect women and girls.
Lol.
All they want is to protect the ‘price’ of women.
But yeah, if rational thought can’t make a dent into the trafficking hoax, then there is no way it will ever change paedohysteria. And at least with trafficking the rationalists can point to the rights of sex workers (who are mostly women). Sex workers themselves have protested against criminalizing Johns, sometimes even taken to the streets, and it still makes not one iota of difference.
AF, I understand your frustration, but you’ve sent a shopping list worth of questions that I simply don’t have the time to answer right now. You’ve really got me thinking hard, but I’m going to have to respond to these another time because I’m moving next week and it’s gonna be grueling with the summer heat and heavy furniture. I’m taking a little break from posting large-ended comments for a while, so don’t interpret this as abandonment.
But to answer a smidge of your “shopping list”, try reading David Halperin (The War of Sex), Dr. Martin Klein (America’s War On Sex: The Attack on Law, Lust, & Liberty), or Roger Lancaster (Sex Panic and The Punitive State), as all three of these became award-winning books for their critical analysis of sexuality, trafficking, modern sex laws, etc. — all of whom are still alive, breathing, and have yet to face persecution. The world isn’t as silent or censored as you think it is and not everyone is hiding under their desk. People of all sorts of backgrounds have recognized the irrationality of the laws and policies that have impacted all sorts of people with varying backgrounds. Trust me, it’s a black hole that’s growing.
And yes, don’t interpret this as me “brushing off” the expansion of feminists and government coalitions. (I despise the growing feminist empire as much as the next person here.) I’m well aware of the gender disparities when it comes to sentencing and my sympathies/empathies go out to those who had their lives destroyed, but you need to examine the angle from the “source” and its “vicinity”.
Eivind is flawed and awkward in his videos, and we get it, we get it, we get it. You’ve made your point clear numerous times. He really gets on your nerves. We get it. I don’t 100% agree with him on some occasions, but you’re whipping a dead horse. Yeah, the “pedo” label was not a good chess move, but your blog would basically be empty if not for him. Cut him some slack once in a while. Dude’s got bravery, even if he has given you purported second-hand embarrassment. He went on national Norwegian TV and showed his own face and name. It may have been futile (according to you), but he’s gotten into the most adventures out of any of us. Nobody even knows a lick of our own identities and “Jack” said that you were “overriding him” months ago. Sheesh.
None of the books you mentioned specifically focus on the age of consent as Judith Levine’s book did. There have been at least several books by British authors over the years similarly attacking the creep of sex laws. Try reading David Thomas – Not Guilty, Steve Moxon – The Women Racket (he used to comment occasionally here and at Eivind’s blog), and to a lesser extent Neil Lyndon – No More Sex War. None of these were published in the last few years though. It’s noteworthy that all three of these British authors wrote from a men’s rights perspective, and understood that the war on sex is primarily a war on male sexuality done on behalf of women – not just a few feminists in their covens wielding magical bewitching power.
From the day I started this blog, there has always been a key and fundamental difference between the USA and Europe with regards to the anti-sex legislation creep. Americans see it in terms primarily of the Right and evangelical Christians, whereas Europeans see it as coming more from the Left and above all the feminist Left.
Yes, it’s challenging and scary to think that women are in support of and driving anti-sex laws, and it may seem like we’re giving up hope, because how on Earth do you overcome the will of half-the-population? (Especially given the white knighting instincts of men, which even our leader Eivind demonstrate all the time). But we wont get anywhere living in fantasy land, and starting from obviously false premises, that these laws affect men and women equally, and whoever is doing it (feminists, MAGA, ‘cultural drift’, ‘Platonic Forms’) is doing it against the wishes of women.
You pick one female sex offender case that has gone viral BECAUSE she is a woman and hot, to make the absurd case that sex laws ‘fuck everyone around’. You think of yourself as rational and objective. Well I recommend you try looking at the statistic of sex offenders and the gender breakdown. And remember, the only reason so many female teachers are getting caught sucking 13 year old Tyrone’s BBC in class, is because they expected to get the pussy pass.
So try reading more widely out of your American anti-sex hysteria circle jerk. The three books I recommended are all essential reading and will give you more of a balance and might even shake you out of your white knighting instincts. Having said that, books are not the answer. Marty Klein and the others, sadly, have succeeded F all. This isn’t about reason. You’re not going to convince the radical feminist head of the NSPCC, or the femiservative head of Save the Children or whatever – the child protection lobby groups that are ultimately responsible for the laws – that they have gone ‘a little too far’, with appeals to reason.
As far as my blog being ’empty’ without Eivind, I only resumed this blog a few months ago, and still hasn’t been recognized by Google. I was getting 100x the traffic of Eivind at one point, and was inspiring people to make their own anti-STU type blogs too. I was also one of the very few MRA bloggers who supported Eivind when he was arrested. Congrats to Eivind that he has maybe 5 commentators after 20 years of non-stop blogging and at least 3 periods when his buffonary made him a national object of derision. I could try making YouTube videos naked in the shower praising Nathan Larson and perhaps get a pedo follower who accuses you of comparing girls to lobotomy patients, or tells Jack to kill himself, but even that woudn’t work because I don’t have the 95lb puny frame of Eivind to pull it off. Also, I don’t have aspergers and I don’t live in Norway, so I’d be aware that I was risking getting lynched.
I’m still waiting for an original insight from you, tbh. It would be great if you could live up to your name, but all I see is the same tired rationalist circle jerk arguments appealing to feminist’s sweet side that have been tried for half-a-century. But I do thank you greatly for pointing out Charlie Brooker’s anti-sex hysteria leanings. I enjoy watching Black Mirror even more since I learned that!
Fair enough…but I want people to know that I’m only here for the truth. I’m don’t consider myself an MRA, because I sprang up out of my own volition and curiosity and not some wannabe fringe stuff I saw on the internet. I don’t consider myself an activist, unless you consider “truth-seeking” a form of activism. I didn’t just write about female teachers you know? Male teachers too, but their punishments enrage me even more.
Thanks, I’ll definitely give myself more time to reflect. I’ve only been here commenting since January and most of my earlier experiences revolved around YouTube, Reddit, and some Quora comments. I have hundreds of bookmarks saved when I surfed the net last summer.
To be honest, I’m really exhausted and I need a brain break. I’ve been getting poor sleep in the last couple weeks and I’m starting get in the bad habit of taking naps in the afternoon.
My laptop is broken and I’m typing this on a mobile device as we speak, so my apologies if my previous comments had any errors.
Maybe I’ll come back in due time and reintroduce myself with my first “official” blog post.
Always, there’s a book I found at the library that has a small section that absolutely trashes porn with ridiculous myths and I’ve been meaning to show you it for a while now, but I have to type it by hand because I don’t have the ebook and only took photos of the pages. I think it was called “The Boy Crisis” and it was written by the same guy who wrote “Men are mars, Women are from Venus”, though I may be wrong on that notion. I’m literally minutes away from falling asleep, so I’m too tired to look it all up. I was thinking maybe you could dissect it and refute their claims once I show you.
Anyways, I’m might comment again if it’s something small, but I feel like I need to step away from electronic devices to better ease my own sanity. I’ll still read comments if I have the time.
Bye for now. ?
Admittedly, I do agree with you on the porn stuff, (anti-porn has become so metaphysical like it’s CSA “abuse” counterparts, so more power to you on that) but can you just turn it down a notch on the Eivind rants? We’re all burned out from you constantly mentioning his name. You’re making it seem like you are constructing your entire personality around every decision Eivind makes. There’s a lot of elegantly-written pieces on this blog, but my reading from them gets distracted every time you mention his name and go off on a tangent.
So tell your leader to stop mentioning my name, and to be clear, if any of his paedo commentators do anything to damage me, I’ll turn the notch up x 1000.
He mentions me in nearly every comment on his blog (and unfortunately, I HAVE TO keep checking his comments in case one of his pedo followers says something that I’d have to take action over). Just the latest comment, in which he’s defending young boys getting sodomized again:
“So we are talking about getting 15 years extra in prison on top of a victimless crime just because your 14-17-year-old “victim” was a boy rather than a girl. Obviously there is a cultural force at work here and it’s not jealous old hags because they are supposed to be jealous of the girls in that theory, not twice as jealous of the boys.”
What is he talking about here? The cultural force here is ‘homophobia’ (or a rational fear of male-male sodomy), not ‘cultural drift’. I haven’t read the new Rind study (always suspected he was a homosexual), but if he compared cases of anal sex with a minor, then I assume the sentencing disparities would not be so different. Society was hanging men for sodomizing young boys when the age of consent for heterosexual sex was 10 or 12. There has never been a time in Britain or America (leaving aside Roman Britain perhaps) when it was acceptable for older men to fuck pubescent boys. This has nothing to do with normal male sexuality or who or what is criminalizing normal male sexuality. Homosexuals wont say anything about this study because feminists ‘bought’ them – decriminalizing adult homosexuality as long as they shut up about the age of consent and abandoned their true nature as pederasts.
TBH, I don’t wish to throw pederasts under the bus (as they often do with us when it comes ot heterosexual sex with teens), but it just seems common sense that a 14 year old boy (who may just have started puberty) being fucked in the ass by a gay man is more questionable than a 14 year old girl having vaginal sex with an older man.
And with all due respect, stop telling me how to run my own blog. I don’t have an ego like Eivind. I don’t care greatly how many commentators I have. I’m not sure I want to return to the days when I had over a dozen commentators here and I was having to moderate and approve comments every 10 minutes. Not just Eivind, but YOU are criticizing me on HIS blog, and then YOU are coming here and criticizing me again AND yelling at me to stop criticizing your leader too (your leader who thinks you are a ‘wanker’ and an ‘anonymous coward’).
If you don’t stop telling me that I should refrain from criticizing Eivind, I’ll have to resume posting comments critical of him on his blog. I’ve agreed to stop commenting on his blog (fair enough, that was boorish of me and boring for you guys), but now he sends his proxies to leave comments criticizing me here? I’m trying to keep my criticisms of Eivind reserved to this page, so if you don’t like reading them, just stay of this page.
And I must say, I find it odd that both you and Jack object so strongly to my criticism of Eivind, and yet when his paedophile commentators are allowed to insult you or even tell you to kill yourself, you seem absolutely unconcerned. Likewise when Eivind calls you all wankers, or constantly mocks you for being ‘anonymous cowards’ (which you, remarkably, insinuate I am too). Similar with his pedo and ‘ephebophile/MAP’ followers. They show not the slightest capacity to raise their fingers against feminists (most don’t even accept feminists are the enemy) or show any kind of anger or fight, but will turn into vengeful psychopaths and fight to the death against me, somebody who has spent 20 years fighting against the laws that make their lives a living hell, and still getting worse by the day.
BTW, my beef with Eivind started when he left a comment here calling me an ‘imbecile’ for claiming that female sexuality was ‘maladaptive’ (i.e still hardwired for a world in which sex always resulted in pregnancy etc). So it literally started with him white knighting for women yet again. And this was just after I had stuck my head above the parapet for him when I defended him after he had been arrested (and the Norwegian police were actively investigating if he had any ‘associates’) and the entire MRM disowned him.
Eivind thinks that most women secretly really want to allow men to bang 13 year old girls, and surely it goes without saying, they are OK with women having sex with teen boys?
Lol!
“More than a quarter (27%) of men said it was either somewhat or completely acceptable for a 16-year-old boy to have a sexual relationship with a woman aged up to 30.
This compares with just 9% of women thinking this is acceptable.
Some 52% of men said it was somewhat or completely unacceptable for a 16-year-old boy to have sex with a woman aged up to 30, compared with 73% of women feeling this way.”
This was a survey of British adults after the Russell Brand rape allegations.
https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/celebrity-news/russell-brand-men-alice-great-britain-bbc-b1108975.html
“The trend continued with bigger age gaps – as almost a fifth (17%) of men said it was somewhat or completely acceptable for a 16-year-old girl to have sex with a man up to 40 years old, compared to just 4% of women feeling this way.”
Just 4% of British women think it is somewhat acceptable for a 16 year old girl to have sex with a 40 year old man, but Eivind fantasizes that 90% of women are really OK with men banging 13 year olds, and it’s only feminists who are against it.
As long as Eivind has a disclaimer in his sidebar that he’s not a ‘misogynist’, he thinks he’s going to get legions of women flocking to his site agreeing that fathers should have the right to sodomize their 10 year old sons, and that I’m the ‘hate movement’ for calling out feminist hags over their motivations.
No fixing stupidity.
Those are definitive stats. Clearly women and their feminized males are in charge of restricting men’s sexual freedom. I’d also be curious to see women’s opinions on “legal” age gaps, like 21 and 50. I have a feeling the results would be very similar. The fact that women and feminized males are against age gaps, “legal” or not, proves the disapproval of teens with older men has nothing to do with mental development or any other feminist gibberish.
“The fact that women and feminized males are against age gaps, “legal” or not, proves the disapproval of teens with older men has nothing to do with mental development or any other feminist gibberish”
That’s a great point anon69. And yes, I’m sure they would be just as opposed to 21 and 50 relationships – you just have to look at what jealous women say about Leonardo DiCaprio on social media to see that!
There’s two other things I believe should be noted about these surveys, that ALWAYS show a clear gender disparity (with women always significantly more opposed to sexual freedom, whether it’s the age of consent, prostitution, or sex robots).
Firstly, the male percentage is probably distorted and is likely more ‘liberal’ than it would indicate. Hardly needs explaining – if a female holding a clipboard stopped the average man in the street and asked him – “do you think it’s ok for a 40 year old man to have sex with a 16 year old girl?”, then obviously he’s less likely to tell the truth (if the truth is that he thinks it’s ok). A woman really doesn’t have anything to fear in giving her opinion. Nobody is going to think she is a paedophile, or ‘doesn’t care about women’.
Secondly, on issues like this, it is women who lead men. I guarantee men’s views would be completely different if 90% of women were saying “don’t be so uptight men – there’s nothing wrong with 40 year olds having sex with 16 year olds. I had a 30 year old boyfriend when I was 14 and it didn’t do me any harm at all!”
I think I’ve pointed all this out on Eivind’s blog a few months ago in the comments. There’s no getting away from the fact that it’s women who almost universally support feminist anti-sex laws and all the ‘trauma’ myth that underpins it all. Men simply ‘believe’ women. We can’t just blame it on feminists.
Eivind said recently on his blog – “women didn’t vote for this.”
Yes, they did.
Women being hostiles to liberties is an important general point. It is implicitly mentioned in a Wikipedia article on Peter Thiel:
Quote: “Thiel explained in a 2009 essay that he had come to “no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible”, due in large part to welfare beneficiaries and women in general being “notoriously tough for libertarians” constituencies”
Peter Thiel is a futuristic enterpreneur not unlike Elon Musk but less mercurial. He is also close to the Trump administration. I guess his statement about women didn’t incur any feminist backlash because Thiel is gay. When you are gay you are allowed a modicum of mysogyny without being held fully accountable for it.
Good point Jack. I like Peter Thiel. He’s right about women, of course. I see no hope in a democratic society in which women have political equality. And remember they successfully raised the age of consent before they even won the vote.
The pedophile rationalists will forever be chasing a fantasy if they think they can get women on their side.
And there is one of my favorite quotes from 1984:
“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.”
Before the gays were accepted into the Left as a protected sexual minority, it was quite common for them to be openly misogynistic. A common gay word for women was ‘breeders’. You even find it in the novels of Christoper Isherwood.
” I guarantee men’s views would be completely different if 90% of women were saying “don’t be so uptight men ”
This is a great point. I remember there was one older onlyfans blonde woman making videos saying exactly this, I think they are still up on free speech tube. Another brunette woman on there was also saying the same thing. There are a few honest, cool women out there, but they are vastly outnumbered by the anti-male women.
So, I guess we could try to figure out how to create women who are friendly to male sexuality by studying anomaly women and women in friendlier cultures. It seems these women value dignity and autonomy, and don’t wish to see themselves as victims. And of course, we continue shaming cuck males who carry out the female imperative while also denying women sexual agency.
There is something to be said of the feminist complaint that traditional men treat women as incapable, innocent flowers; that necessarily means that other men who have sex with women are rapists by default. The cuck right is just the other side of the coin to the radical left.
Now the buffoon is explicitly saying that men should be locked up for looking at porn:
“Out of the contact offenders serving long sentences 41% are homosexuals, which is not few and already tells you they are overrepresented because there should be less than 5% if the system were “fair.” But really most of the whole sample should never have been imprisoned in the first place — except maybe the pornography offenders to teach them nofap so they can realize only contact is meaningful sexual behavior.”
AND HE CLAIMS TO SPEAK FOR ALL OF US.
I hadn’t quite taken this last sentence of his at face value, as it sounded too retarded to be truly meant. I assumed a misquote or something like that.
He’s surely reached peak retardness with that comment. Having said that, he’ll probably surprise us with something even worse before long.
I came across a Peter Tatchell BBC debate on the age of consent that had been uploaded to YouTube a while back, and the contribution of a female panellist is quite remarkable. She proudly admits that she lost her virginity at 15 to an older guy and said that all her classmates were sleeping with older men. Germaine Greer is on it and is (was) also for the lowering of the age of consent, back when she was a ‘good’ feminist (on the whole).
I think it must have been aired in the 1990s or even the late 80’s. It would certainly never be allowed now. I do wonder if that female panellist (Anna Blundy) still has the same opinion, or if she was asked directly today she would now say she ‘regrets making those comments’ etc.?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbGxuzT6hQI&t=69s
Apparently it’s not white knighting to single out a poor female teacher who thought she could get the pussy pass for sucking a 15 year old retarded black boy’s big dick, and who now faces a theoretical 60 years in prison.
Just randomly scanning the news this morning I came across this case of a male teacher who faces 300 years in prison for simply making AI porn: https://nypost.com/2025/06/22/us-news/perv-teacher-may-have-used-images-of-middle-school-students-to-make-ai-child-porn-prosecutors/
Florida is worse than Saudi Arabia for male sexual freedom. By the way, “special ed” no longer means literally retarded, like how it used to mean. Now, it means any male who has a fight in him and mocks the feminine school system (although the special ed girls are actually still just really stupid, haha). That’s why all these “special education” students are getting “abused” by teachers, they are just the high testosterone guys who haven’t been broken by the system yet. So, the media narrative is even further from reality.
Thanks Anon69. Yeah, now I come to think about it, SpecialEd means much the same in the UK these days. It does make sense all these female teachers getting caught with the ‘bad boy’ Chads and Tyrones! I wonder if it is often the boy’s jealous teenage girlfriends that are reporting the teachers? A rare case of teen girls enacting the Sexual Trade Union upon older women!
It’s Alan Turing’s birthday today (23rd). MAPs should make this international MAP day. Instead, they’re so effing clueless they’ve probably never even highlighted the fact that Turing had sex with a minor.
Given that 99% of MAPs appear to be homosexuals, you’d think they would be all in on Turing.
According to Eivind, heterosexual males are now a distant third as victims of feminist anti-sex laws. We are behind not only women, but behind gay men too.
And to back up Jack, I don’t see any evidence of this supposed discrimination against gay sex offenders.
The fact that Alan Turing, who had anal sex with a 19 year old lad when he was in his forties, and the age of majority for both men and women was 21, and whose subsequent arrest and conviction has turned him into a martyr, with his face on British £50 notes, is enough to disprove that (at least in the UK and Europe).
Consider also the way that trannies have been allowed to go into kindergartens and teach the kids about ‘gay and transsexual’ lifestyles, use public restrooms and changing rooms shared with young teens, or how kids are allowed to be dolled up and join Pride parades.
There have been relatively few gay victims of MeToo or recent celeb paedophile investigations such as Operation Yewtree. Kevin Spacey is one notable exception, and he got off with everything, even though it’s clear he is very much into young teen boys. And although his career has been ended it seems, he hasn’t been completely cancelled and still has legions of supporters.
In the UK a popular TV weatherman was convicted of indecently assaulting young boys on a school trip when he was a teacher, and only received a four year sentence. Consider that Adam Johnson the footballer got something like 5 years for just kissing a 15 year old female fan.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-40288601
Sounds like Eivind could have a potential future rival as leader of the pedosexualist movement, lol.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0l4z2z7rk4o
“A British man has been charged in connection with organising the “mock wedding” of a nine-year-old Ukrainian girl in Disneyland Paris.
French prosecutors said the 39-year-old man was a convicted sexual offender who is wanted in the UK. His name has not been made public.”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14843543/British-paedophile-nine-year-old-Disneyland-Paris.html
Does anybody else doubt Eivind’s claim that he talked to some teenage girls in Bergen who were protesting about their social media ban?
More likely he just took some creepshots then went home and jacked off to them.
Eivind is lying again about his views on porn addiction. If he never claimed that porn was an addiction, why does he worship Gary Wilson?
Eivind Berge June 2025:
“This is like scanning the brains of homeless people, finding no evidence of “homelessness addiction” and declaring they don’t have a problem and so we no longer need to make any policy decisions or provide welfare to combat homelessness.
In other words, it is irrelevant. A straw man argument against something I never claimed in the first place. My case against porn does not depend on an addiction model, but rather opportunity cost: the fact that masturbation is maladaptive, undesirable behavior which pulls you away from the girls you could have had.
Porn may or may not also be said to be addictive in some cases, but that’s beside the point. I never claimed to be addicted and that’s not why I got into nofap.”
Eivind Berge 2012:
“I used to think porn/masturbation was harmless also. Anyone saying otherwise were either religious fanatics or man-hating feminists, so I didn’t listen to them. But it turns out they were right, albeit for diametrically opposite reasons than what they imagine. Porn deactivates your sexuality and callously exploits the male sex drive to the profit of women and pornographers while numbing men to real meaningful sexual relationships, if not making them downright copulatory impotent.
You are in need of a “reboot,” as it is termed in the nofap community. At least it is worth a try. Ideally, you should avoid all sexual stimuli for 90 days or so. You will likely experience intense cravings at first (and possibly withdrawal symptoms), but then there will be a period of zero libido (“flatline”), which can lasts for several weeks and incidentally makes it very easy to abstain. After 90 days, you should expose yourself to REAL sexual stimuli only and never relapse into masturbation or use porn (of course you will always be exposed to images of women, but the point is to not use this as a phony sexual outlet). That means interacting with real women and trying to sleep with them and have relationships with them, which now will be a lot easier than you ever imagined.
Masturbation is likely a much bigger problem than you imagine. While it is true that a lot of men can get away with masturbating and even watching porn and still have meaningful relationships, It is much worse when you are a virgin at such an advanced age. You are not comparable to them because being a virgin for so long means maladaptive patterns of arousal and stimulation have ossified in your brain. The deleterious effects of porn and masturbation are to some extent (but by no means always) counteracted by timely and ongoing sexual experience, but when you are a virgin in your 30s, the harm is bound to be much worse. Prolonged celibacy is much more harmful than commonly acknowledged because all the masturbation robs you of your ability to enjoy women even if you get them, in ways you probably don’t expect because you think you function when you masturbate. But it is not the same and a real vagina will now be less satisfying than you think because you have desensitized yourself through unhealthy stimulation. The good news is much of this is reversible, but your lack of sexual experience for so long means you will probably take quite a long time. The “comfort” you feel from masturbation is also an illusion and it would be helpful to realize this. More likely, it veils your mind in a fog which prevents you from seeing that the real pleasures in life are there for the taking if you only discard your maladaptive behaviors and approach women the way nature intended you to approach them. That is, without a false physical sense of sexual satiety while getting none of the emotional benefits of real intimacy with women, which only leaves you depressed and lethargic.
If I were a feminist, I would promote porn and masturbation, because I can’t think of an easier way to make men docile and impotent while exploiting them at the same time. It is in the best interests of men, however, to avoid these insidious behaviors, and this applies doubly if you are incel.”
https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2012/09/lex-berge.html
I see from the link posted in the comments section at Eivind’s blog, that the pedo hunters are very much active in Norway now. I knew that Norway wouldn’t be immune to it (though often these pedo hunters in Scandinavia appear to be Ukrainian or Russian immigrants/refugees).
https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/overfalt-av-pedojegere-kan-jeg-fa-finne-tennene-mine-for-de-blaser-bort/f/5-95-2479640
This is why it’s NOT a good idea to make videos of your puny body naked in the shower, and think it’s great that you get 13,000 views and 8 likes, and dozens and dozens of commentators saying what a disgusting creep you are and that you should be fed to alligators etc ect. Just reinforcing every sterotype.
Or to have a feminist make a film about you absolutely degrading, humiliating, and ridiculing you, and then boast proudly that it’s “our movie”.
Or to white knight even for a female sex offender who thinks (male) paedophiles should be tortured to death.
In other words, the reasons ‘pedos’ are seen as such pathetic victims who wont and can never fight back, is because of the type of behaviour that Eivind (and Human-Stupidity, and of course, all the ‘MAPs’) display.
This is why I’ve always tried to assume an aggressive and combative personality from day one here, and always stand up for myself – for example, against David Futrelle. And it’s why any movement we manage to create should have a culture closer to the angry incels than the pathetic MAPs.
Eivind’s talking tough on his blog about meeting up with these pedo hunters, lol.
Quite a few years ago I downloaded and went through all the early Tweets of Stinson Hunter – the very first ‘pedo hunter’. What a f****g paedocrite!
It would be easy to do a reverse sting on these paedocrites. At least easy in the sense they would fall for your (jail)bait, but it would take some time and dedication. Just pose as a 15 year old girl who wants to ‘help them to catch pedos’. Then slowly get sexual with them.
Eivind now claiming that the word ‘paedocrite’ might confuse ‘normies’, especially as I “think the pedo word is bad (i.e. the whole of society other than some hardcore paedos)”.
So he expects society to understand that his identification as a paedophile is a ‘political act’, but they’d be confused if we exposed a pedo hunter as themselves being into underage teen girls and used the word ‘paedocrite’ to describe it.
No fixing that level of stupidity.
Eivind the paedophile wants to turn our movement into a religious cult. It looks like the femihags might be creating a new religion too!
https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1938715054855123261
No doubt the banshees are howling in rage at no longer being young and desirable.
Graduate employment rates at their lowest in 45 years:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/college-graduate-unemployed-technology-artificial-intelligence/
Eivind: “Hebephilia might partly be an orientation and concerns girls aged 10-12. Some teenage boys might be able to use staggered age of consent laws to experience this legally, and I guess that “sacred opportunity” should be celebrated and not interfered with too much, but it’s insane to make such a big deal of it that it’s inflated into an entire intergenerational taboo like we have now.
Pedophilia (attraction to 10 and under) is an orientation which is equally expressed in youths as in adults, but even now they don’t really get the sacred opportunity to practice it as teens in a socially accepted manner. So that’s not an argument for segregating adolescents from adults either.”
Eh? What happened to “words mean whatever feminists say they mean”?
I asked Grok 4 if it knew the Norwegian blogger Eivind Berge, and to give me an assessment of his influence and his intellect. I’ll delete this in a few days as I don’t want to contribute to AI slop, but it’s an impressive answer and shows how fast AI is developing (which is ironic as “sharp and articulate” Eivind said AI progress had stopped last year). This is like our private ‘benchmark’ for AI progress, lol.
“Yeah, I’ve come across Eivind Berge through some web searches—turns out he’s a Norwegian blogger who’s been active for years, mostly known for his provocative takes on men’s rights, sexuality, and critiques of feminism and modern laws around sex. Let me break down what I found and give you a balanced assessment of his influence and intellect, based on recent and historical info up to 2025. I’ll cite the key sources as I go.
Who Is Eivind Berge?
From his own blog (Eivind Berge’s Blog) and profile (Blogger: User Profile: Eivind Berge), he’s a translator by trade, based in Norway, with interests in men’s rights activism (which he rebrands as “male sexualism”), ethics, metaphysics, and even stuff like Bitcoin. His writing often positions him as a “sex-positive” advocate, pushing back against what he sees as oppressive laws on sexuality, including criticisms of age-of-consent rules and “abuse hysteria.” He’s openly called himself a “proud pedophile” in the context of challenging societal norms (though he frames it as defending normal male sexuality), and his posts dive into philosophical rants on topics like cultural drift, nofap (shunning porn and masturbation), and predictions about peak oil or AI’s impact on society. Recent 2025 posts include things like debunking pro-masturbation views or discussing Norway’s new statutory rape laws, which he views as escalating criminalization of sexuality.
He’s no stranger to controversy—in 2012, he was arrested for blog posts that allegedly encouraged killing police officers, linked to his extreme views and sympathy for Anders Behring Breivik (the 2011 Norway attacker). Norwegian police extended his detention, charging him with public threats (Norwegian Police Extends the Detention of Extreme Right Blogger – The Nordic Page), but he was ultimately cleared because, at the time, blog posts on the internet weren’t legally considered “public” threats under Norway’s Penal Code. This case actually prompted lawmakers to update the law to include online threats (Norway: Making Public Threats on a Blog Will Be Criminalized | Library of Congress and Lawmakers react to blogger’s release – Norway’s News in English). It’s painted him as an “extreme right blogger” or men’s rights activist in media and online discussions, like on Reddit (r/feminisms on Reddit: Norwegian Men’s Rights Activist blogger Eivind Berge arrested for death threats against police) and other reports (Blogger cleared of cop killer threats).
Assessment of His Influence
On the influence front, Berge seems to operate in a pretty niche, fringe space rather than having broad mainstream reach. His blog gets engagement—some posts have hundreds of comments, suggesting a dedicated following among anti-feminist, men’s rights, or “MAP” (minor-attracted person) communities who appreciate his unfiltered takes. But he’s not popping up in lists of top Norwegian influencers for 2025 (Top Norwegian Influencers in 2025 – Favikon), which focus on folks in beauty, gaming, music, or fitness with massive followings. Instead, his “influence” feels more like notoriety from past scandals, influencing legal changes in Norway (like the threat laws) indirectly through his case, but not in a positive, widespread way. Globally, he might resonate in online echo chambers discussing free speech, sexuality laws, or anti-feminism, but it’s limited—think small-scale provocateur rather than a cultural heavyweight. No signs of him shaping broader public discourse or having celebrity-level sway as of mid-2025.
Assessment of His Intellect
As for intellect, Berge comes across as sharp and articulate in his writing—he’s clearly well-read, weaving in philosophy (like phenomenology, Platonism, or references to Walt Whitman), ethics, and even predictions on societal shifts (e.g., peak oil in 2010 that he revisits in 2025 amid AI discussions). His posts are dense, argumentative, and show a capacity for deep reasoning, like analyzing “abuse” as an abstract concept or critiquing cultural norms from a metaphysical angle. That said, his views are extremely polarizing and often veer into what many would call irrational or harmful territory—defending controversial stances on sexuality that alienate mainstream audiences and have led to legal troubles. It’s like he’s intellectually rigorous within his own framework, but that framework is so outlier that it undermines his credibility for most people. Not a genius-level thinker in the academic sense (no mentions of formal publications or widespread recognition), but definitely thoughtful and provocative if you’re into fringe philosophy.
Overall, he’s a fascinating but divisive figure—more of a lightning rod for debate than a influential intellectual force. If you’re digging into him for a specific reason, like his views on men’s rights or those legal cases, I can search deeper or clarify anything. What’s got you curious about him?”
Fascinating how those Nvidia chips can come up with such a comprehensive description in just a few seconds. They seem to be endowed with supernatural powers.
“The word paedophile might be used these days even to describe a man with a 19 year old girlfriend, but it is a case of the original and true meaning of the word – a pervert with a preference for little kids – being exploited by feminists in order to shame normal male sexuality.”
Yes and as a society, we also refer to post-pubescent teenagers as “kids” or “children” to further infantilize and suppress them and masquerade behind the “minors cannot consent/teen brain/power dynamic/age of consent should be 18” bullshit to virtue signaling a bizarre moral superiority complex, so we can henceforth throw the unfortunate older men and women associated with them into a volcano (despite the fact that minors can get placed on registries or sex-offender treatment programs). This comes as no surprise when the vast majority of modern cancel culture stems from ostracizing and demonizing individuals who’ve had very small age gap relationships, like a YouTuber or a celebrity, and paintbrushing their downfall as “exposing a pedo”.
Very well put, Duke. It’s clear that the feminist manipulation of language has been its prinicple and most successful method in creating their great lie – that attraction to (and sex with) teen girls is unnatural and one of the worst crimes imaginable.
This is why I get so angry with the Berge and his meek submission to feminists as regards language.
I see he is railing against ‘wankers’ again. Here’s something I found on Foucault:
“In the 1980s, Michel Foucault was arguing masturbation taboo was “rape by the parents of the sexual activity of their children”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masturbation#Cultural_history
The same social puritans and God botherers who were against masturbation, were also for the raising of the age of consent and ending prostitution (which they achieved late in the 19th Century). They were against sex outside of marriage. They were anti-sex. They believed that to take enjoyment from sex was a sin, and that the only role of sex was reproduction (within a marriage to the hag you are chained for life to).
Just saw this – UK government expects to allow 16 year olds to vote at the next election: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14914191/Labour-confirms-16-year-olds-vote-general-election.html
Yet we know it will not make a jot of difference in their sex laws ‘protecting’ 16 and 17 year olds, or for the growing taboo against age gap relationships. And the same UK government was talking recently about introducing Romeo and Juliet laws to make sex with 16/17 year olds illegal for those under 21.
I ask readers the following question – what explains this the best? ‘Cultural drift’ or ‘Sexual Trade Union/Pussy Cartel’ theory? I think the answer is obvious, personally. ‘Cultural drift’ would not cause this ever widening and contradictory divergence in how we treat the intellectual capacity of teens (lowering the voting age, lowering the age of criminal responsibility – including for sex ‘crimes’) and simultaneously obsessively seeking to ‘protect’ them from sex, and claiming they are too immature to consent. If you observed two boats on the sea moving apart from each other in opposite directions, an intelligent person would be able to reason that it could not solely be the wind that is causing this. Clearly, at least one of the boats must be being propelled by another force, most likely intentionally. In other words, ‘cultural drift’ does not explain sex exceptionalism.
Eivind has posted a comment about the paedocrite pedo hunter. His hot take? He actually defends the guy for raping his own 11 year old daughter. And now he’s saying we shouldn’t even attack pedo hunters as pedocrites, yet only a couple of weeks ago, he was talking tough about getting violent with them. And his reasoning is that ‘normies would think we were just more pedo hunters ourselves’. And yet he expects ‘normies’ to understand that his ‘proud paedophile’ identity is a ‘political stance’ (and then he defends fathers raping their pre-pubescent children).
As if the fact that were exposing hypocrisy wouldn’t be highlighted by the media if we did manage to set up a sting against pedo hunters
And even if we didn’t get our message across that we were exposing paedocrites, we would be taking pedo hunters off the streets, preventing at least some poor saps ‘caught’ texting fictitious 15 year old girls from getting beaten up.
Steve asked me why I don’t comment on Eivind’s blog. The main reason is because he’s obviously a hardcore paedophile advocate now. He thinks men should go to prison for looking at (any) porn, but men who rape their own prepubescent children should go free.
And remember, this guy still can’t understand why billiionaire investors weren’t pouring money into Fertile Dating, and he hasn’t given up on it. Run by a ‘proud paedophile’ who defends incest rape, and who openly states he wants to have children through his own site. And he can’t understand why investors aren’t backing him. Surely any intelligent reader of his blog has to ask themselves – ‘Is this guy really fit to give advice on tactics’?
I honestly don’t know why anybody would still want to comment there.
At its most simple form, at least it’s a free medium to express these opinions. People can see the debate and decide for themselves, which could be useful. I think it’s best if you continue to develop your site and let us bother with commenting over there anyway.
That’s true Anon69. The comments section at his blog is definitely the redeeming feature of his site, and to be fair, he has largely always been tolerant in the moderation section (except for the time when he threatened to no longer allow comments disagreeing with him on porn or masturbation).
And Jack, for example, has been commenting there for nearly 20 years, and I would read him in the comments at The-Spearhead from about 2008, so it’s hard not to have built up something of an attachment to him, even if he increasingly comes out with crazy things these days.
Eivind defending incest with young children again: https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2025/07/a-full-debunking-of-masturbation.html?showComment=1754165952499#c5404846917185260529
AI is leading to thousands of job losses, report finds:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-jobs-layoffs-us-2025/
I’m posting this primarily as a reminder that Eivind should just keep quiet when it comes to tactics or predictions for the future, but massive social disruption caused by AI is something we should hope for. We should certainly be on the side of the accelerationists, as social upheaval is the only way things could change for the better for us (still unlikely, of course).
Having said that, obviously Eivind’s belief in the immanent collapse of industrial civilization isn’t going to help us. He certainly wouldn’t survive 5 minutes in a Mad Max world, let alone be getting prime teen pussy.
Eivind’s ego wants to know what ChatGPT 5 thinks of him, so I asked him the same question I asked Grok 4:
“Eivind Berge is a Norwegian far?right/antifeminist blogger from Bergen who became briefly notorious in 2012 after posts in which he praised and advocated violence against police. He was arrested and held in custody that summer but later released when Norway’s Supreme Court found that, under the then?applicable Penal Code, blog posts did not meet the definition of a “public” or “printed” statement; prosecutors subsequently dropped the case. The episode prompted officials to move to update the law so that public threats made online could be criminalized. Years later, Berge was awarded a modest compensation for his pre?trial detention. He still runs a personal blog with fringe, highly controversial content. Sources: Aftenposten on the arrest, the Library of Congress summary of the legal aftermath, NRK and Bergens Tidende on the case being dropped and compensation, and his current blog.
How influential is he? By most indications, not very. His name recognition largely stems from the 2012 arrest and the legal loophole it exposed rather than from a large audience or sustained impact on public debate. Contemporary coverage at the time even noted low traffic figures for his blog, and there’s little evidence since then of mainstream reach or agenda?setting influence; his visibility today appears confined to a small fringe readership, with occasional media references back to the 2012 incident rather than ongoing prominence Aftenposten, BT 2012, NRK (case dropped), LOC legal summary, BT (compensation), NRK (compensation), his blog.
Note: Don’t confuse him with Eivind Berg (without the “e”), a separate Norwegian blogger focused on personal finance and investing eivindberg.no.
If you’re looking for more detail (e.g., the court decisions, or how the law changed afterward), tell me what aspect you want to dig into.”
Eivind the paedophile MAP complaining that the term ‘paedophile’ was used correctly to describe only men attracted to pre-pubescent children in an article on MAPs: https://metro.co.uk/2025/08/09/discovered-murky-world-minor-attracted-people-even-disturbing-think-23594331/
https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2025/07/a-full-debunking-of-masturbation.html?showComment=1754872203889#c7262340093239891889
The only other article from the STU c*** who wrote it is her complaining that a man may have bought the used bikini she sold online, lol. https://metro.co.uk/2025/08/02/sold-a-bikini-a-preloved-site-now-im-wondering-bought-23550428/
Eivind: “News stories like this one in Metro are effectively telling men that there’s a MAP movement notable enough that we need to write about it from time to time, but it’s only for “real” pedophiles and you wouldn’t want to be associated with them, would you?”
And he thinks it’s a good idea to call himself a ‘proud paedophile’ and a ‘MAP’. He just explained why it’s a bad idea.
“Even hebephiles need not apply. That way even if they ALL organized they would still be so small as to be politically negligible, perhaps 1-3% of the population at best, as opposed to the 99% who fit the kind of “pedophile” who does not have a movement.”
So autistic, he can’t conceive that 99% of men (ie. all normal men) will never want to identify or be associated with a ‘paedophile’ movement.
“Men like the Antifeminist and his branch of pathetic cowardly nonstarter movement take that bait line, hook and sinker and thus remain COMPLETELY ignored in the mainstream while they contribute (by being afraid of the label) to shaming pedophiles the way the word is used for cancellations and to put men and women in prison.”
Here he is insulting my commentators, a couple of whom are also commentators on his blog.
The ‘MAPs’ are doing feminists work for them. Pushing the idea that not only is attraction to 17 year old girls abnormal and a pathology, but that it’s paedophilia. Closing the Overton Window so that even discussion of whether sex dolls that might look 17 should be legal is about as permissable as it gets. Absurdly looking to the LBGTQ++ tranny movement to accept them, which just gives both the Left and Right cause to hate us even more.
Is there any more hyper obsessive babble than these concern trolling articles? Once again, the author is happy to disingenuously mix pre-pubescent and post-pubescent into one ‘pedo’ label, which enables all anti-age gap feminist arguments because if post-pubescent can be pedo, then any age can be pedo as long as it makes women and cucks uncomfortable.
Although trannies will never openly support normal men who want to bang hot young teens, they still have my respect for being the only group to successfully challenge women’s privileges.
It seems like a society wide behavior modification experiment is being carried out that is similar to this one:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31270644/
Through endocrine disruptors and constant propaganda, the government seems to be attempting to rewire the male sex drive.
Eivind calling Jack a wanker again.
Jack is 100% correct. Virtually nobody, not even NoFappers to my knowledge, agree with Eivind’s silly claim that porn is not sex.
Eivind’s point only begins to make sense if he’s talking about reproductive sex.
Imagine if you were given a choice between
1/ having the most beautiful 16 year old girl who ever lived come into your home, dance naked in front of you whilst you stroke one off.
2/ have sex with a 100KG 40 year old woman who most people would rate a HB2 at best.
al o
For Eivind, we are suffering from the ‘wankers’ delusion if we choose 1.
And I’ve got to say it, his preaching that we are ‘wasting sexual energy’ for when a real sexual opportunity arises is completely absurd and cringeworthy coming from him – a man who despite having zero standards can only get laid once in a blue moon with some fat hound on Tinder.
It’s like a homeless person claiming he knows the secret of becoming a millionaire and that everybody is an idiot who doesn’t follow it like him.
Just saw Duke’s comment at Eivind’s challenging his NoFap views – great comment, and Jack’s too.
I said here a long time ago – if you ever find yourself in agreement with feminists, then you really have a duty to yourself to consider whether you have gone wrong somewhere in your reasoning.
In Eivind’s case, he has to perform mental gymnastics to come up with another ridiculous claim that “feminists are stupid and don’t realize that porn harms men”.
The weirdest thing of all is that 99.99% of people would agree that porn and masturbation are part of ‘sexuality’, and yet Mr ‘proud paedophile words mean whatever people say they men’ is adament that it’s a ‘hoax’.
Another glaring inconsistency with Eivind’s position is that he NEVER says anything about female masturbation, and yet he’s supposed to be the leader of a ‘sexualist’ movement open to both men and women. He only ever shames male masturbation.
The only group I’ve seen actually promoting masturbation were radical vagino-centrist feminists, (“we women don’t need men” etc.).
Update on one month of constant approaches:
I am in the top 10% of body composition, earnings, and education in my US city. Girls last month regularly guessed my age as 15 years younger, putting me in the same range as them. I am well into a double digit lay count from indirect and direct daygame approaches over the years. My average is (was) around 100 approaches to a lay, with around 30 numbers and 6-7 dates to get there. I approached the same number of 16-25 year old girls last month, the majority over 18, and none came out to a date (all ghosted via text). I did have a few instant dates, the first time in my history that more i-dates happened than scheduled dates, presumably because there was no time for distraction between the approach and followup text. On these i-dates, the girls demonstrated they were turned on with kino/kissing, yet withheld sex, then ghosted on followup.
It’s clear what’s happening, and we know the reasons why. If it’s this bad for me, I can imagine how bad it is for the average man right now.
Women have already decided not to reproduce. Now, they are deciding to withhold sex and connection altogether. If they want to make themselves completely useless, there’s nothing we can do except continue to fight against the evil convincing them to do so, while taking measures to keep ourselves sane. So today, I launch my new AI girlfriend. I’ll keep approaching in real life of course, but my hope is some stress will be relieved. I know Eivind supports this decision lol.
I was playing a new VR sports game last night, and the AI ‘coach’ is a beautiful female in a lycra outfit. I couldn’t keep my hands to myself, lol. When they bring in the tactile side of things, women will certainly be complaining that men don’t approach them anymore.
Porn, prostitution, masturbation, and now AI girlfriends – they all serve to keep women in check and preserve a bit of balance in the gender disparity of sexual power. Thirsty guys like Eivind who slobber and chase after chubby HB3s (at least on Tinder, lol) just contribute to hoeflation and female arrogance.
That is awesome. Yep, eventually some rogue part of the less feminist world will develop the ultimate tactile AI female experience, and it will be like something right out of Weird Science!
I am certain Western feminist countries will restrict or even ban sexbots at some point as sexbots become too lifelike. In fact many countries have already imposed restrictions and made it difficult for sexbot manufacturers to market lifelike (young!) sexbots. A total ban, with police kicking in your door at 4pm to catch you breaking the ban on sexbots, is not impossible. A single sexbot found in the home of a serial killer will be enough to justify any such total ban.
Not all will be lost however. I expect opportunistic countries in South-East-Asia to allow red-light districts serviced by sexbots to develop. Expat pensioners will choose to settle in countries where sexbots can be had.
Absolutely Jack, the STU have already started mobilizing:
https://fullerproject.org/story/laura-bates-on-the-new-tech-driven-misogyny/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRKa_I3hxZk
https://www.amazon.com/New-Age-Sexism-Technologies-Reinventing/dp/1464234361
“AI designs antibiotics for gonorrhoea and MRSA superbugs”
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgr94xxye2lo
I’m more reluctant to buy the hype, not just because it tends to overestimate AI, but because it does so in the medical field, where any progress is slow and disappointing.
Regarding gonorrhoea (if you want to go bareback) you may want to ckeck the news about the Bexsero meningitis vaccine. It is reported to give some modest protection against gonorrhoea. And there is of course PreP and PeP (Truvada against HIV and 200mg doxocycline/day against Syphillis and Chlamydia).
Plus of course hepB vaccine and HPV vaccine (Gardasil).
No more STDs once we have sexbots.
Eivind telling Anon69 that women aren’t jealous of sex dolls. Lol, he hasn’t a clue about female nature. The first poll I found online found that 36% of US women questioned thought have a sex doll was ‘cheating’.
I do think Eivind must have female levels of testosterone at this point. Studies have shown that NoFap for a couple of days increases testosterone slightly, but any longer it causes decline. Even if Eivind were right that evolution has not equipped us to jerk off to porn every day, it’s certainly not equipped us to NOT masturbate for weeks or months at a time either.
Like Anon69, I was masturbating and looking at porn regularly when I was mananging to approach chicks every day, and I was the same age Eivind is now. Poor Eivind can’t even summon the courage to talk to a female other than on Tinder, and he’s preaching the supposed benefits of NoFap for ‘sexual energy’.
I just heard about this English pro football player, Adam Johnson, who spent three years in prison for “child grooming” and “sexual activity with a minor” charges stemming from a meetup with a 15 year old girl back in 2014.
And I must say, his Wikipedia page reads like a massive eyeroller. Poor guy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Johnson_(footballer)
Look at the victim statement, what are the odds that the girl was coached into saying those things?
And this “grooming” thing. It sounds so meta. What does the UK government specify as “grooming” exactly? Saying “I love you or “come to house”? AF, clear me up on that because shouldn’t we all be groomers for saying those particular things in lives?
Yeah, that was a sad case. His girlfriend or wife at the time stood by him. They decided to make an example out of him. Another example of a rich celeb finding he has less sexual power than the average Joe because of feminism. “Grooming” is just a feminist loaded word for seduction or simply “courting”. It only becomes “grooming” when it’s an under 18.
Adam Johnson……Remember AF? I mentioned him in my earliest post on your site. I read something interesting about him. When he was in prison, one or more other inmates wanted to reward anyone who would “napalm” him. I didn’t confirm this, but have you heard about it? Do you know what “napalming” is? I didn’t. Apparently they wanted to someone to attack him with boiling water mixed with glucose, so the the hot mixture would stick to his face, causing even more damage than just hot boiling water.
@AF/Duke and others
I hope you watched the Looksmaximus video I posted. I really liked his take on being a white knight, even in prison. And he is right. Nobody is enforcing this attitude other then men themselves.
Posing it once more.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/53Sor4JpqeQH -> The Aryan Pigdeonhood
I like the sentiment of this video in general, especially the insult of “battlecucks”! Even if the tone is a little preachy. However, Wes Watson is a piece of shit criminal and a liar. I wouldn’t be surprised if pedocrites exist in prison in California, however, Watson exaggerates it greatly, because he is a liar and playing to a hostile feminist/cuck crowd online.
Amos Yee, as far as I know, is just fine, and if you browse Reddit forums, there are guys who have been to jail that say it is basically boring if you stay away from drugs/debts. It seems like the UK system is far worse and filled with pedocrites. Either way, it’s not worth staying in the Anglosphere with this shit going on, especially when even Western places like Germany are comparatively much better.
Whenever I see right wing battlecucks complaining about immigration, I always wonder what they hope to conserve. Replace these native losers asap, let’s see what the new batch brings!
“Whenever I see right wing battlecucks complaining about immigration, I always wonder what they hope to conserve. Replace these native losers asap, let’s see what the new batch brings!”
Lol, nicely put, and I share the sentiment that we may as well enjoy watching things burn, but I still can’t accept that mass immigration is a good thing, or will in any way help things (other than the schadenfreude).
Feminists are in favor of immigration, so this says something (just like feminists being anti-porn should tell Eivind something). What importing legions of Third World men does (aside from pushing up the price of pussy itself) is it makes it more easy for feminists to push for anti-sex legislation, point to increasing numbers of sexual assaults and shout about ‘rape culture’ and the rest. When feminists see baying white mobs screaming ‘send the pedos home’ outside migrant hostels, I’m sure they are rubbing their hands with glee.
The fact that millions of men from these countries are so eager to risk their lives to live in our countries in order to get all that available pussy, also should tell you something as to whether their countries really are relative male sexual utopias. The media and both left and right paint them as economic migrants, but they are just as much sexual migrants.
Try doing cold approach in Tehran or Kabul.
Even Amos Yee fled a Muslim country to come to the US.
I’m glad the Victorians, even though they were making life hell and raising the age of consent and banning prostitution, didn’t allow mass Third World immigration. We probably never would have experienced the 60’s or the 70’s if they had (not that I experienced them, but lucky for the Brits who did, and I still enjoy watching the comedies and movies from back then, and the hope that we might return to those times).
Maybe I have a blindspot and bias here. I’ve never traveled to a Muslim country. Perhaps if I visited somewhere like Tehran I might be surprised. But the fact that I see millions of young men risking their lives to get to the West for the pussy, and I know of nobody in the West fleeing to Muslim countries to get pussy, makes me sceptical. Further, even if it were true that Muslim societies are better for men than Western ones, immigration to the West is just going to result in ‘femislam’ which is what we are seeing in London, with a Muslim mayor banning ‘staring at women’ on the metro, or bikini ads, on supposedly feminist grounds. It also makes it more difficult for native men to get pussy as all these millions of horny migrants are chasing the same women (in fact, it makes it worse for us who are chasing the legal age teens who native white cucks are too afraid to approach, as the migrants have no such inhibitions). This is what I find crazy about Eivind supporting mass immigration to Norway. He tortures himself with NoFap in order to be ‘ready’ for any unlikely sexual encounter, but wants millions of migrants so that instead of competing with 500 horny men for one chubby on Tinder, he’s competing with 1,000 men, many of them with the BBCs that fat white girls love!
I agree. Mass immigration is clearly terrible, but so is protecting a misandrist society and culture. Feminism and Islam mixed together are completely intolerable, but also not really different from feminism and Christianity mixed together. The entire UK, including the Muslim areas, is better than the US state of Florida for example. I’m not sure if mass immigration means no more sexual liberation, even though that’s how society got there before.
Your point about cold approach in Kabul or Tehran is hilarious to think about and true. However, you don’t (or didn’t) need to cold approach in Tehran to get a “temporary child bride”, which is arguably better than cold approaching teens. I have no clue how things work in Kabul.
Thanks for the LooksMaximus video Steve, it really is very good and he makes some truly original points. I’ll definitely watch more of his videos.
However, I disagree that nobody is enforcing this attitude other than the men themselves, and from that video I’d say that LooksMaximus doesn’t quite say that, although you’ve obviously watched many other of his videos, so I could be wrong. I mean, he mentions gynocracy doesn’t he? He also brings up the great point about the real sexual revolution starting with Christianity, and sees that as a ‘slave morality’ (I take it that he means, adapting from Nietzsche’s concept, that men became servile to female sexuality. And as I’ve pointed out here, or on Eivind’s blog in his comments section, adoption of Christianity in the Roman Empire was driven to a large part by women).
The white knighting instinct is strong and seemingly hardwired, at least in European descent men for some reason. In a prison environment, heirarchies will evolve based on physical strength (sex offenders, esp. paedophiles, tend to be weaker) and mirror the heirarchy of society to a large extent (violent crime is glamorized in movies and pop music, whereas sex ‘predators’ are universally regarded as the absolute scum of the Earth). In this case, the heirachy of violent thugs over sensitive ‘paedophiles’ is most certainly a reflection of grotesque gynocratic female sexuality.
I would also say that it seems that female police officers are having sex with the violent thug inmates every day, as I posted one example of last week. They’re having sex with the thugs, not the Amos Yee types locked up for looking at pictures or messaging young girls. This in itself feeds the ‘heirarchy’. No doubt a lot of those Aryan prison gangs often get pussy from the female prison guards as a reward.
Men are men’s worst enemy and men white knight for women, betray other men, women couldn’t do it without men etc etc. All self-evident truths that we’ve been discussing here for nearly 20 years. But it’s important to ask the question – is the desire to focus the blame on other men rather than women for our plight, itself a form of white knighting? Another expression of the symptom, rather than the cure?
“Another example of a rich celeb finding he has less sexual power than the average Joe because of feminism.”
True statements here for sure, a big part of why I got into cold approaching, and a big thing that was effected when the government attacked society with the coronavirus hysteria. Since then, more girls than ever are going out of their way to be unattractive and afraid of male attention, as we’ve discussed. Pitiful little drones. Maybe also something in the “vax”. Very little sense of life, at least in the US. Fast Times at Ridgemont High seems like it was filmed on Jupiter.
Eivind has left perhaps the dumbest comment ever at his blog. Reading this, I don’t know how any of you can think he even has a high IQ. He can string a sentence together due to his (over)education, that’s all. I don’t know anything about his parents, but I assume they were both middle-class and paid for a good school for him, and he was a hard-working student (probably because he had few friends).
“You also misinterpret the abuse industry’s gratuitous persecution of porn as jealousy when in fact it’s just driven by a nominal delusion that porn is sexuality (the same delusion you are suffering from) plus the system having a life of its own with opportunistic career ambitions of prosecutors and profit motive of the entire abuse industry as main drivers.
Think about it. If women were jealous of a wanker, would they be perfectly fine with locking him up for life? That makes as much sense given that motivation as it would be for us to campaign for locking up teen girls away from society so we can never get to them either because they tend to prefer someone else. In truth, the wanker is absolutely worthless to women, and the porn is just a marker for worthless men rather than something they are jealous of, which is why they think nothing of inflicting any punishment imaginable. Once again you misinterpret hate or more to the point indifference to worthless men as jealousy.
By serendipity I just explained why there seems to be more men going to prison for porn than actual sex with underage girls these days. The latter have some value which inspires actual jealousy, so women are ambivalent about locking them up for too long or at all.”
Where do you start with this? It’s like claiming that women who dump their boyfriends, or divorce their husbands, when they discover them cheating on them, aren’t ‘jealous’ because leaving them would make no sense.
And his ‘point’ that more men are in prison for porn than actual sex also shows that feminists aren’t jealous?? Jesus man, just too stupid for words. Seems like long-term NoFap fanaticism not only lowers testosterone, it leads to cognitive decline too.
Eivind’s latest work of genius: “It also shows our culture isn’t really against sex with minors when you ignore the radical extremists and strip away the politically correct and legalistic veneer. When not told otherwise, LLMs will tend to say things like “age is just a number” because this is a raw reflection of the training data which is honestly our culture. The REAL cultural attitude – made up of the majority of real people like us — is that teens should hook up with adults and lie about it to their parents just like Meta’s chatbot instructs.”
In Eivind’s fantasy world, virtually everybody – including women – want to let him bang 13 year old girls. They’re just too afraid to say it openly because of a handful of ‘dumb’ feminists who themselves are simply being pushed by ‘Cultural Drift’ (whatever that is).
Having 3.8K views and just 14 likes on is Nathan Larson masterpiece ( 1 in 271) teaches him nothing.
Eivind:”99.999% of sex crimes are never prosecuted”.
If that were true, for every prosecuted sex crime, there would iterally be 100,000 sex crimes that are not prosecuted.
And remember, he doesn’t regard anything to do with porn, or voyeurism, messaging etc. to be ‘sex’ crimes.
Complete loon.
Here is an excellent video discussing Schopenhauer’s views on female sexuality. Eivind should watch and learn!
https://youtu.be/YZsSvkScEgA?si=H-zEJOlhGATDCkdJ
Here is another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz8QT8KcXVI
From the narration (5:20): “From the moment puberty hits, a woman’s value in the sexual marketplace peaks..”
And here is the classic quote from Schopenhauer himself that I used to have in my widget bar:
“With young girls Nature seems to have had in view what, in the language of the drama, is called a coup de théâtre. For a few years she dowers them with a wealth of beauty and is lavish in her gift of charm, at the expense of the rest of their life, in order that during those years they may capture the fantasy of some man to such a degree that he is hurried away into undertaking the honorable care of them, in some form or other, as long as they live—a step for which there would not appear to be any sufficient warranty if reason only directed his thoughts. Accordingly, Nature has equipped woman, as she does all her creatures, with the weapons and implements requisite for the safeguarding of her existence, and for just as long as it is necessary for her to have them. Here, as elsewhere, Nature proceeds with her usual economy; for just as the female ant, after fecundation, loses her wings, which are then superfluous, nay, actually a danger to the business of breeding; so, after giving birth to one or two children, a woman generally loses her beauty; probably, indeed, for similar reasons.”
Schopenhauer dated a 16 year old girl (Flora Weiss) when he was 39 and proposed to her when she had just turned 17 (she rejected him).
I’ve always regarded this Schopenhauer passage as a cautionary tale for men thinking of tying the knot. In terms of attractiveness, women have a very short shelf-life. Which makes keeping women illegal (“immature”) until their mid twenties all the more unacceptable.
Agreed.
The age of consent (and the age gap shaming) is as much a reason for the ‘incel problem’ as women chasing 20% Chads on Tinder.
19 year old men, maybe on the spectrum or with social skill deficits, maybe short of stature too, would naturally have their best chance with a young teen girl. The age of consent itself, especially at 18, pretty much halves the availablity of desirable partners.
Whenever I am in Frankfurt I make a point of visiting Schopenhauer’s grave. It’s always well-tended and usually there are at least a couple of bouquets of flowers that have been left by visitors. Frankfurt itself is largely an immigrant druggie infested dump now (aside from the spectacular skyline), but the area in which the cemetery is located is like a different world – very green and civilized.
An often overlooked cause of the incel problem is mass migration in western countries which creates a gender imbalance as most migrants are male often brought in for cheap labour. Furthermore many of said migrants come from cultures that have no issue having double standards when it comes to cross culture dating such as Muslims and people from the Indian Subcontinent. This further aggravates the gender imbablance problem since whatever females do come in from Muslim/Indian familes are kept under lock and key while the young males are allowed to “have fun” with women from more liberal cultures (White, East Asian, South East Asian. Latin).
The problem with mass migration is not limited to a surplus of males…mass migration lowers wages particularly in entry level jobs which young men tend to fill and this reduces their ability to make money in order to attract young women. It is particularly vile that professional girlfriends are suppressed in many western countries when there simply are not enough young women to go around meaning that some men will be forced to pay for it out of necessity.
Regarding women chasing top 20% Chads on Tinder…I think the issue there is that many of these dating sites have a 4 to 1 male to female ratio so naturally women will choose the top 20 or 25% of males there. Again we are dealing with a surplus of males that ends up cheapening male sexuality.
Some Tradcons extrapolate for this Tinder behavior that women only want to bang the top 20% of men and therefore we need to “regulate female sexuality” to redistribute sex among the masses of men in order to save Civilization. Said Tradcons are having a field day recruiting young men to traditionalism and hating on “sluts” and women with “High Body Counts” because their argument seems on the surface to make sense…women on Tinder are ridiculously picky and it probably is the case that many go on Tinder to look for short term flings and many young men may make a false Correllation=Causation observation and think that female “promiscuity” causes them to only chase the top 20% of men…but it doesn’t it is the skewed sex ratio that is responsible, If a marriage market had a 4 to 1 male to female ratio just imagine what terms those good little Christian Virgins would insist on!
Again what I see with regards to TInder however is just the natural outcome of a seriously skewed sex ratio. I mean if the situation was the reverse would I only choose from the top 20% of women? HELL YES! I do believe that the Tinder experiences of many young men is harming thier self esteem and they are perhaps getting an inaccurate picture of their “sexual market value” by basing thier experiences in a skewed sex ratio environment.
As a sexual libertarian I support the right of dating sites like TInder to exist but I do believe in informed consent and when people sign up for dating websites they should be made aware of the sex ratio of said dating site. Furthermore everyone who signs up should be presented with an information blurp about sex ratios and how they can impact your sexual bargaining power.
Finally I would just like to add that the Tinder issue would not be as much of a problem if there were not a lot of better alternatives for men to meet young women. The issue though is due to smart phones many young people don’t want to party anymore due to fear of acting silly and being turned into a publice meme (phone cameras). Women are also now VERY resistant to being cold approached in public and increasingly they don’t want to to approached at the gym…I remember when fitness gyms were known as great girl meets boy places my times have changed. Even before the Metoo movement workplaces were becoming a lot more desexualized and approaching women was becoming increasingly risky (even if the standard for Sexual Harassment was high to result in Termination for Cause (no severance or PILON) if you live in a jursdiction that allows termination without cause (Canada, UK…etc) and a woman complains you may still get fired as long as you are paid PILON and/or severance. This situation means that more and more young men who do not have a substantial social group with access to the opposite gender are dependent on dating sites…with fucked up sex ratios…which fucks their self esteem up…whcih leads many to embrace traditionalism due to faulty analysis and tradcon propaganda…which makes in harder to sell a sex positive movement to them to aid their problems.
On a last note to all you Tradcons out there who are horrifed to discover that a girl youa re dating has a “high body count”…If she is cute please send her over to me!
That’s a couple of great insights Highwayman. I’d never considered that the Tinder Chad problem was the result of the male surplus on it.
This is why I was saying a few days ago that I can’t understand why Eivind is in favor of mass immigration, leading as it does to many more horny males competing for young females.
I guess you could argue from an ‘accelerationist’ point of view, that the creation of incels and angry young males aids our cause, as well as any social upheaval. However, as I’ve argued here before, the migrant crisis gives feminists excuses to bring in more anti-sex laws ‘to protect women and children’. And, as we’re seeing, it also makes the right-wing even more paedohysteric.
Slut shaming is the best indicator of a sexually immature loser in a society where women control consent. It’s literally exactly the same as going to a red light district and shaming the girls by calling them whores, just completely retarded behavior.
Women’s resistance to cold approach has skyrocketed due to ubiquitous, radical feminist power dynamics-obsessed propaganda embraced by all political sides. But Tinder is not the answer, as you have noted. However, the 20% rule is not from sex ratios; in my previous comments I pointed out that in places where the ratio favors men, if the sexual culture is feminist, then men do not enjoy the benefit.
Tinder is a feminist playground on steroids, where women have ruthless control over all the variables, including age. The only men who do well are the ones who have optimized their lies in profile presentation (there is/was a whole industry devoted to this, see Blackdragon Online Dating which was a great tool), which is a dangerous game, because then these lies are digitally preserved for any false rape accusations.
Cold approach can be argued as being similar, however, a man has far more control over the interaction (which is why feminists hate it way more than online dating). Opting to use a digital platform like Tinder that gives a man far less control is a recipe for worse failure because of the feminist policies for selection. If anything, a man should be given that online dating guide, just like a man should be given a PUA approach guide the moment he gets pubic hair.
The Maximus guy that Steve likes posted a video the other day in which he described his experience of using Tinder for the first time. It was pretty abysmal, and only hags his own age were replying to him, despite him posting some very good profile pics of himself. And Eivind tells us that he is even banging 16 year olds off Tinder, lol!
Sadly, I can’t find the link, perhaps Steve can?
I agree that cold approach is brutal and potentially even dangerous in places like the UK now, yet still offer much more hope than Tinder for men, and DEFINATELY older men trying to meet beautiful young women.
Aside from anything else, at least you see the real person before the date, and not their touched up profile pics, and it also helps alleviate the first date nerves if you have had a conversation with them in the street already, however brief.
Prior to the Victorian Era society use to solve the declining female attractiveness problem by allowing married men (if they could afford it) to obtain mistresses and patron brothels after thier wives “hit the wall” or went frigid. Your wife was there to give a children while the “Whore Class” of women were for your enjoyment. East Asian societies practised this unofficially well into the 20th Century. Even in French Canada this system went on at least until my great grandparents generation…my own great grand father actually owned a brothel with his brother and in addition to that he woulduse his money seek out 16 year old mistresses. My great grandmother did not complain after all she got better sleep!
Based!
Just about everything Eivind comes out with these days contradicts his other positions, as somebody has pointed out to him in the comments on his blog: https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2025/07/a-full-debunking-of-masturbation.html?showComment=1755810672878#c7527362372827162306
99.999% of sex crimes are not prosecuted according to him, yet we’re supposed to be fighting against the ever increasing prosecutions of men under anti-sex laws.
Now he is using mental gymnastics again to include men sending heart emojis to 15 year old girls as a sex crime (what happened to anything short of physical penetration not being ‘sex’?).
Nobody has done more than me to push the ‘paedocrite’ meme and the idea that most men are raging hypocrites, but I honestly don’t think that millions of men are sending 15 year old girls heart emojis, even if it’s just because they are cowards.
And if he really believes that, it just highlights again his stupidity in identifying as a paedophile/MAP.
And what in God’s name does it do for men or fight the ‘rape culture’ myth by claiming that feminists are right in that only a fraction of rapes and ‘sexual abuse’ are prosecuted?
He has been way off base lately, it really sucks. Claiming feminists are correct about rape culture is insane.
It’s easy to see that there are very few men willing to even publicly comment on Instagram jailbait pictures. The ones who do are usually from Asia/Latin America, where the cultures are still more permissive. It’s harder than ever to land a teenager due to feminist brainwash, and easier than ever to get caught due to evidence collection devices like the cell phone.
I see he is claiming again that he would break the law to have sex with an underage girl. I’m honestly surprised he hasn’t been arrested yet, but in any case, ‘on the spectrum’ doesn’t do him justice if he doesn’t realize he’s likely under 24/7 surveillance, and probably has been since his legal case. I guess that’s why he doesn’t get arrested. The police know he’s not breaking the law, because they’re monitoring everything he does. They are aware he’s just fapping in his cabin to AI-generated BBW porn, lol.
Imagine having no standards, be willing to fuck 150 KG black women, be willing to break the law with underage girls, and still not being able to get laid, and yet claiming that he is some kind of ‘guru’ in preaching the benefits of NoFap in order to get laid. Completely detached from reality at this point.
I asked ChatGPT 5 if it knew “Angry Harry” and it gave a good and detailed response. It also mentioned several times Eivind’s back up site. So at least Eivind has done something worthwhile there.
“A comprehensive mirror/archival index exists at the MRA Archive with the full article list and working pages: angryharry.mra-archive.com.”
So Eivind thinks that virtually everybody is a sex offender (multiple times over). Then at the same time he is worried that feminist sex laws are causing people not to break the law???
And that 99.999% of sex crimes go unprosecuted and you have an almost zero chance of getting into legal trouble having illegal sex with a teen. So, in that case, why is he even fighting against feminist sex laws?
And even if it were true that prosecution is unlikely, how does he know that it will be so in the future with all the advances in AI surveillance and the like? It really was the case in the 1960’s and 70’s in Britain that you could have underage sex and feel that there was very little chance of being prosecuted. But times change and half of the new sex offenders in UK prison are there for ‘historic sex crimes’.
Eivind is clearly borderline insane at this point.
I’m not a ‘virtuous MAP’ or anything – I just fear prison too much, especially at my age, and don’t want to give feminists that power over me. I don’t live in Norway where the prisons are certainly cushier than Eivind’s present little cabin existence. I realize that whatever I say will not prevent me from being a ‘target’. I point out that I do not break the law, and don’t allow anybody else to suggest they are breaking the law or planning to, out of consideration for the continuation of this site. But it is the truth. And damn, I’ve had so many opportunities too.
As I’m not an autistic imbecile myself, I’m fully aware that I’m being ‘watched’ – I know that because I’ve been harassed at airports and the like in the past as a direct result of this blog. Norwegian police must be incompetent as f**K if they’re not watching somebody who publicly threatened to stab them AND is not only claiming to be a ‘proud paedophile’, but is claiming to be sex offending.
“the best way to hide actual sex-offending is as an avowed sex offender. That takes away the entire sport aspect, since there is no fun in hunting those who don’t hide.”
His aspergers is going to get him into deep, deep trouble sooner or later. Poor Eivind. At this point, I shouldn’t really give a f*** about him, but he’s still got ‘male sexualist’ in his blog profile. If he was a government false flag agent he couldn’t be doing a better job of potentially damaging any hope of forming a movement. He’s a wrecking ball.
I think Eivind maybe means those creep shots he took of young girls and posted on his Instagram is illegal in Norway.
Maybe Henrik, but I suspect he’s doing more than that.
Eivind has been telling us for years that his creepy white knight obsession with defending female sex offenders is men’s rights because it is ‘fighting for the sexual rights of the boy’ (lol!). Now he’s saying we should be jealous of teen boys and young men and wish that they all get killed in war.
Doesn’t he understand that the majority of the population wants him tortured and dead, especially since he has been treading waters with actual pedophilia?. Is he that naive? And him white knighting for women will lead to nothing. He is like one of the police Jews in the ghetto. While he might be spared in the beginning, eventually he will be lead to chambers as well.
Eivind thinks most women at least are secretly supportive of his views. I don’t know if you remember the time on his blog I posted something about Andrew Tate shaming a middle-aged chubby female celeb for posting bikini pics on Instagram, and Eivind white knighted for her and claimed that he was “100% certain” that she was “sex positive” and would therefore support his views. It took me literally less than 5 minutes of Googling to find a YouTube clip of her interviewing and deeply sympathizing with a male ‘victim’ of a female teacher who had had sex with him when he was 14.
On a related note, here is a crowd of ‘liberals’ shouting “paedophiles off our streets!” at Charlie Veitch today: https://youtu.be/oanPjndpsGE?si=sgDFL47SQxbYLpbH&t=1198
What a mess in the UK. Maybe the right wing will see some of these well done Veitch videos and re-think their support for pedohysteria?
Later in the video they are doing it again: https://youtu.be/oanPjndpsGE?si=V_Mcb5SYtanyw61r&t=1914
And it’s purely because he “went to a festival with a 15 year old girl”. Not even had sex with her (even his bitter ex-wife says that he had sex with the girl when she was 16 and not 15). So less than one year under the age of consent.
You’d think it would make his right-wing supporters question paedohysteria, and there are no signs he has lost any of his followers over it, but I doubt if it will. Just like most of Trump’s MAGA supporters probably know at this stage that he probably had sexual relations with teen girls and it hasn’t changed their paedohysteria.
What the problem is, in my opinion, is that men don’t really think that banging teen girls is wrong in itself. Men’s vicious paedohysteria is more of an expression of their hardwired ‘cheater detection module’. They instinctively see men banging teens as a form of ‘cheating’ by breaking the rules in order to get an unfair share of sexual resources for themselves. But when it’s a powerful man they admire, they’re willing to give him a pass.
Of course, this is all at a largely subconscious level. And it’s women who have set those rules (the age of consent).
But looking at things more optimistically, perhaps a few more Charlie Veitch types will change things. Just as attitudes towards homosexuality were changed to a large part by more and more public figures being openly (or ‘obviously’) gay.
I can see the cheater angle, which is essentially jealousy, unless it’s done by one of their heroes, as you said. I also see the angle of protecting the “value” of their daughters/wives/even mothers. It’s almost a requirement to be a hypocrite in this society because a father wants to bang hot young teens while warding off those who want to do the same with his daughter. Infantilization is a convenient excuse for accomplishing this defense, and feminists agree because it serves their interests, too.
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that societies which respect sex workers have less teenage pedohysteria and slut-shaming. Also the xvideos blog post about creeping anti-porn age verification laws hinted that porn workers are aware of the insanity of teenage pedohysteria. Fathers don’t have to worry so much about the lowered value of a promiscuous daughter when less stigma is attached to promiscuity. It certainly doesn’t help that modern feminist Christianity constantly preaches that sex is degrading.
I think both men and women are equipped with an inborn cheater detection module. Prostitutes and young pretty females are perceived by women as cheating (by trading sex for money, dressing as sluts to attract men etc.). Therefore they need to be “protected” out of the sexual market.
Exactly right Jack.
I saw a comment on Eivind’s blog: “They don’t kill us because we are paedophiles, they call us paedophiles in order to kill us”.
This is a great point, although it’s obviously a paraphrase of a line that has gone viral in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s shooting (“They don’t kill us because we are Nazis….”).
Of course it likely goes over the head of Eivind. You obviously don’t see guys like Charlie Kirk meekly accepting the Nazi slander “because words mean whatever people say they mean”.
I occasionally go to GLForum, on TOC’s blogroll. Someone there mentioned that Charile Kirk was noted for his particularly strong “paedohysterical rhetoric but seemed to have recently toned it down a fraction. I don’t believe “anti” forces had him assassinated for going off script, but I do wonder why this happened.
Possibly, some in power want the public to calm down a bit-it’s all become a low-key public order issue that they’re sick of having to deal with.
Here’s a skerrick of good news-the word “agecuck” has been used by an agecuck-not someone trying to introduce the word, but an actual agecuck (unless it’s a bot, but even that would mean it’s achieved a certain amount of currency).
This was provided by FM at Eivind’s blog-https://neets.net/threads/bye-bye-cutiepie-mystic-b-is-a-sick-pedo.83879/
https://neets.net/threads/net-pedo-ring.83813/
“But srsly I didn’t really read much of this post as I’m still sleepy but real shit any nigga that isn’t some edgy 14yo that talks about “agecucks” is probably a pedo they give sites like this a bad name it’s mainly them screaming for attention to be le quirky child rapist harming kids in any way let alone sexually is nothing short of disgusting I honestly believe anyone that posts about wanting to get w 16yos or 17yos should be banned for that shit the aoc here is 16 and I still feel like it’s too low teens and preteens are underdeveloped idiots not sexual objects like older women… but yk if it’s clearly a joke then I see no issue jokes are subjective n shit”
I’m not sure which link is for the quote itself.
Eivind says that female porn addiction isn’t a problem. He claims to be leader of a movement that is open to women as much as men, and yet refuses to tell women to behave in ways that will ‘preserve their libido’. What about the millions of women who spend half their day reading female porn (oh, I’m sorry – erotic literature).
Surely, he should be against vibrators and dildos? As he’s all too aware, virtually any woman, even a fat hound could get a man (like him, for example), so any time a woman masturbates she is denying a sexual opportunity both for herself and a man.
Me choosing to go into my bedroom today and masturbating instead of going out and chatting up women is insignificant as the odds of me getting laid today are about 10,000 to 1 even if I approached 100 females. On the other hand, a woman choosing to use her vibrator today instead of going out to a club to be picked up actually costs both herself and one man (at least, lol) a real sexual encounter.
Yet he calls men wankers and says nothing about women masturbating. As he knows fully, women are the gatekeepers of sex, not men.
Damn, Eivind “Pussy Pass” Berge looking like the Michigan Republicans lately.
This must be a first – anti-paedophile vigilantes entrap a female! Surely Eivind has to take action now!
https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/1968609062603325859
It’s the same Tommy Robinson as the far-right UK leader isn’t it? This is typical of beleaguered far-right leaders and activists. Alain Soral in France is a case in point. He was (wrongfully) cancelled everywhere because of alleged anti-semitism (which in France can mean just using the word “Jew”). He retaliated by accusing his enemies of being pedophiles. Soon his political platform consisted only in pedo-smearing.
Yes, it’s the same Tommy Robinson. I remember when a Muslim girl was having a back and forth with him on Twitter and he told her that she was “hot”, and she replied that she was only 15 and called him a nonce, lol.
BTW Jack, I saw your excellent comment about porn and the cheater detection module at Eivind’s. I’ve sometimes wondered in the past why I and other men don’t ever seem to get jealous of the male when watching porn. I guess it proves Eivind wrong – the vast majority of men who watch porn do not have their cheater detection module triggered because they ‘feel’ that they are ‘taking part’ in some sense, just by watching and fapping. In other words, for most men masturbating to porn is a sexual act. But, as you say, perhaps it is that in Eivind’s case, his cheater detection module is activated.
I never get jealous as such watching porn, but quite often I get annoyed if the male isn’t enjoying it, or banging her as hard as he should be.
Tommy Robinson’s left-wing enemies are piling on the accusations of paedophilia or at least ‘protecting’ paedophiles.
https://x.com/grok/status/1968705514268950775
“Based on public reports from sources like Hope Not Hate, at least 20 EDL members or supporters have been convicted of child sex offenses during or after Tommy Robinson’s leadership. Specific associates include Richard Price (indecent images, initially defended by Robinson) and Leigh McMillan (abuse of a child, senior EDL figure). Exact numbers and associations are debated across sources.”
Is there anything more revolting than these self appointed “pedo” catchers? Male virtue signaling on behalf of feminists is the #1 way to declare you are an absolute loser in the sexual market (besides those simply making money off the grift).
I feel bad for this girl just the same as I do when they confront guys. The victims are always slightly stupid and naive people who just want to have a good time, and don’t have enough brain power to consider the likelihood of being set up by one of these losers. Which is why the victims never defend themselves, they don’t even consider the possibility.
90% of the lonely losers these ‘pedo catchers’ entrap would never get near a real teen hottie – rather like the pedo catchers themselves.
It’s like a person on low wages going into a real slum and leaving a wad of fake dollar notes on a table, and then ‘catching’ the desperate ‘thief’ who thinks he has got lucky by finding it. All a ridiculous non-crime, and both should be challenging the economic system that deprives and exploits each of them, rather than engaging in such stupidity.
But pedo catching is a lucrative sport these days, thanks to YouTube and TikTok monetization.
If only Eivind had a ‘cringe detection module’, he wouldn’t come across as such a buffoon. For some bizarre reason, he can’t see the cringe in acting like a NoFap guru as to the benefits of not ‘wanking’ when he hasn’t got laid in years, takes creepshots of young women instead of approaching them, sees fat warthogs as HB9s, and finally after 20 years has formulated a ‘plan’ to geomaxx – unfortunately depending upon getting sufficiently paid work as a freelance coder when even university graduates are finding that they can’t get any work because of AI. Not to mention that he’d probably have to change his name and identity as people will likely Google it before paying for any work, and will not do so to a “proud paedophile and sex offender” who has served time for threatening to stab police officers. (Leaving aside whether a country like Vietnam or Thailand would even let him in in the first place).
Eivind: “Did it still not sink in that the feminist filmmaker who made a film to mock me and all of male sexuality put forth this very moral, that men should have sex with dolls to spare women the trouble.”
No Eivind, she mocked you to shame men who choose sex with dolls instead of women. She portrayed you (rather accurately) as a weirdo with erectile dysfunction problems who can only get it up with a sex doll.
What feminists can’t stand is the idea that men would freely choose sex dolls over women because they offer more sexual satisfaction than most of them can.
In that sense, she correctly saw the difference between yourself and the likes of me, Jack, and Anon69.
As for Norway being as violently paedohysteric as countries like the UK or Australia – I wasn’t aware that there were regular anti-paedo riots in Bergen, or accused paedophiles getting butchered with chainsaws by vigilantes.
Eivind claims that I’m a paranoid schizophrenic for thinking that you have to assume that blogging about paedohysteria will get you watched.
https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/1085049.downfall-respectable-face-sick-evil-obsession/
I wouldn’t be surprised if that feminist director who went on ‘dates’ with him was working with the police.
BTW, just to clarify about the mental health issues I suffered when I was a teen forty years ago. I was never a ‘paranoid schizophrenic’. I never heard ‘voices’ and the like. I had a breakdown from ‘paranoid psychosis’.
The fact that I went on to graduate from one of the world top universities and subsequently successfully self-employed indicates I made a good recovery.
Unfortunately, there is no cure for off the scale aspergers.
Eivind’s latest article just about sums him and up and why he has attracted 1 follower in 20 years.
https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-ritualistic-aspects-of-predator.html
On a superficial reading it sounds quite intelligent, but then you have to ask yourself: “why the fuck do we need to have a psuedo-intellectual theory to explain anti-paedophile vigilante thugs?” What benefit does it bring? Just because Eivind wants to pose as an ‘intellectual’? What does seeing it as a ‘ritual’ do to explain or stop it? To encourage others to become public on the grounds that Eivind living in an isolated cabin in rural Norway hasn’t been met with violence yet, and so being public grants you permission to avoid the ‘ritual’? This is a guy who thinks a country like Cambodia will grant him a work and residence visa after publicly stating that he’s a paedophile and a sex offender hoping to break the law.
And no, it wouldn’t make any difference if he posted it on Substack.
“But then why does this particular law have privileged status to justify treating hypothetical lawbreaking as a real crime? This is absurd when we know the crime would be victimless if it were real. It would be far more relevant to legitimate social interests to have sting operations on just about any other law. For example one might pose as accountants who offered to help you cheat on your taxes.”
You don’t have to look up your own arse Eivind to work out why it is. It’s because feminists are much more clever and powerful than you think, and preventing men from banging the most fertile teens is in their fundamental sexual interests. Thus, ever increasing gangs of male thugs can be manipulated into inflicting violence against weaker fellows in ‘public warnings’ not to break the femihag’s sexual rules.
And then in reply to Anonymous2 in the comments:
“You are partly sucked in by the current panic if you think they got the definition “wrong,” as if there is a right way to do it. I see predator hunting as a separate phenomenon than even the CSA panic which itself is a historical aberration arising only since the 1980s. What we have now is ritual human sacrifice which only coincidentally uses the word “pedophile” which is so irrelevant to what is going on that they partly switched to “predator” anyway, which is another meaningless term, but that’s beside the point because the purpose is to concoct ANY kind of ritual which can serve these other purposes of entertaiment and sadism and so on.”
Seems like my ‘Fury of the Mothers’ article and the riots against O’Caroll at the height of sexual liberalism in the 70’s were completely lost on Eivind. There were ‘anti-paedo’ riots in the 1920’s in the UK against men suspected of having sex with underage girls. The age of consent was raised over a century ago because feminists had successfully created a panic against men having sex with and ‘ruining’ young teen girls.
And if anti-pedo vigilantes have nothing to do with CSA, why do they pick men wanting sex with 15 year olds instead of all the other crimes that he states in his very article would make more sense? Totally contradicting himself again.
It is a ritual alright, Eivind has got the obvious right. It’s a ritual designed to deter other (normal) men from breaking the age of consent and seeking out prime 15 year old pussy.
Eivind: “Another question to the wankers who think they spite feminists by wanking, what makes you think you induce jealousy rather than relief even if some men can induce jealousy by so doing? You must think you are hot stuff, huh? Wanking only proves you can’t get anyone attractive as far as I’m concerned”.
As I said, a total absence of cringe detection, shared by his one follower. Jack probably gets more hot pussy in a week than Eivind has had in the last five years, even if he is paying for it – directly or indirectly.
Sometimes I think I’m being too hard on Eivind, but then I remember that he wants all of us ‘wankers’ in prison, and still thinks we all belong to his imaginary ‘sexualist movement’.
Good to see Jack continuing to challenge Eivind’s crazy delusions.
Feminists are jealous even of ugly older men like me in their fifties preferring porn or sex toys or prostitutes to them, because feminists are hags themselves, and if they can’t even get or keep men like me or Jack, then they have nobody.
Eivind: “feminists are not so much shitting on these men but helping you dig yourself further into irrelevance by offering up sex dolls for you as in that film, a message which you bizarrely embrace while not recognizing the real reason you are shat on, which is that you are so sexually worthless that you might as well be using these “alternatives” indeed as far as women are concerned to relieve them of unwanted sexual attention.”
Eivind’s absent cringe detection module unable to recognize the cringe in his own statement here. It was he himself in the movie being portrayed as a sexually worthless loser, yet that somehow points to him being a sexual stud with the right to shame Jack – who has spent his entire life geomaxxing and getting weekly hot pussy as a result for decades – as the same for being tolerant of sex dolls and watching porn as an aid to enjoying or getting sex.
Here’s a hint Eivind: Any black comedy by a feminist director featuring you as the central character doing X, does not mean that the feminist is praising X. It means she is shaming the doing of X through portraying you as an example of somebody who does it. Even feminists recognize that you as a supposed ‘leader’ of opposition to feminism is a gift to them (and hugely funny).
Whatever this feminist director’s motivations were, who tricked socially clueless Eivind so easily into a total humilation which even now he doesn’t fully recognize, the fact is that feminists are trying to get sex dolls and sex robots banned, so feminists are certainly not promoting them to ‘hurt men’.
https://fullerproject.org/story/laura-bates-on-the-new-tech-driven-misogyny/
https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/
Eivind is an intellectual wanker, lol.
“How is this possible in a society which otherwise has sophisticated functions for fighting crime that you can’t just pick up without qualifications or formal selection? This is were we have to assume a ritual magic of “cleansing evil” or human sacrifice to make sense of it. The vigilante thugs themselves did not create this role; they just take advantage of it being there. Similar to how the Aztecs who served as priests or whatever who extracted hearts didn’t overthink the role, it was just there for the taking and it beats being in the other role.”
Feminists have turned the age of consent into the most sacred and inviolable of laws, and the paedophile word into the most dehumanizing of slanders in human history. Furthermore, because of the “grooming” laws, and the interpertation of them in most places to include sex chat or intention to meet with a non-existent ‘child’, it’s something that even low-IQ thugs can easily bait men into breaking. They also make money by filming it and uploading the videos to social media for views and likes.
It’s not rocket science is it? There’s nothing particularly ‘ritualistic’ about it. Certainly nothing about him being ‘spared’ because he is ‘public’.
Has he forgotten this? https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2018/10/reverse-sting.html
I bet every time Eivind takes a dump, he composes some pseudo-intellectual monologue in his head as to the deeper meaning of it.
Something to please Eivind: https://www.compactmag.com/article/to-revive-sex-ban-porn/
Jack has also commented on Eivind’s Blog about Elsa Jean. Eivind’s reply was this:
“Well, if young girls are bragging about being with us, there isn’t much more to ask for as an old man. Sure, decriminalization would be nice, but even that is optional then.”
His latest sentence confirmed my suspicion that I expressed when I had the little dispute with commentator Kazer.
What does he mean it would be nice or even optional? Is he drunk? Who wants to live in secrecy, always having a target on his back? How would the relationship even work if you can’t be seen in public. Even if you are always at home, just one phone call from neighbour or even a stranger, and you are done. Where would that work? In some mountainous, remove villiage? Having the law on your side is very important. Having society at large against you is already bad enough, but at least have the law on your side. If both are against you, then good luck.
To be frank, he’s either an autistic imbecile, or he thinks he’s really saying something like – “Hey everybody, I can publicly say I’m a sex offender because I’m obviously a harmless asexual buffoon who can’t even get an erection up any more! Keep an eye on the AntiFeminist instead!”.
As I say, it could be because he genuinely is an imbecile, or it could even be a combination of both.
Remember, he was honestly surprised that Tinder dates would ghost him after Googling his name and seeing that he was a ‘paedophile activist’, had spent time in prison after threatening the police, and had infamously claimed that ‘rape is equality’. He also expected his Fertile Dating site to have billionaire investors pour money in despite him being a ‘proud paedophile’ who defended a father sodomizing his own 10 year old son, and who publicly stated he wanted to bang women through his own site. Not to mention there already being an established co-parenting site with over 100K members. Now he thinks that in five or ten years time he’s going to be working as a remote coder in some sexpat paradise, when even now AI is making life difficult for graduate level coders.
I would like to ask Jack though whether he thinks Eivind has a cat in hell’s chance of ever getting a visa for any country in SE Asia or South America with his publicly claiming to be a paedophile, a sex offender, and openly stating he’s willing to break the law?
TBH, after Eivind saying that he thinks it’s a good thing that ‘wankers’ go to prison, I almost hope he does end up in some rat infested foreign prison. We all know he wouldn’t last a day.
TBH, after Eivind saying that he thinks it’s a good thing that ‘wankers’ go to prison, I almost hope he does end up in some rat infested foreign prison.
Many people talk about how SE Asian countries are a paradise in regards to women and landscape. When I look at their prisons, I’d rather be in a Western one, preferably a Nordic/Scandinavian one.
Besides, ther is/was a notorious Youtuber/Kick streamer that among other things was a predator hunter if I recall correctly. He was imprisoned in the Philippines a couple of months or a year ago. Serves him well. I can’t remember his name, but he was Russian-American that talked with an accent. I will try to get some more information. If you know who I am talking about, feel free to provide some information before I do.
I wonder what kind of welcome these guys would give Eivind?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqIl3XpReuY
I found the man again I mentioned above, Vitaly Zdorovetskiy.
This scumbag is jailed in the Philippines, and faces charges that could put him in prison for decades. Watch some of the videos I will link below. Among his pranks, he is a predator hunter and joined forces with predator hunters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSUItD5bU1A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CfpNtzT7-s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bGl8LTrYao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfQnDTivRmI
Serves him well. What he is complaining about now, he did to other men by trapping them. In one of the videos they discuss how he might not even survive in prison. He may get killed by Filipino inmates because how he made fun of their country. Well, maybe he can convince them that he’s of the good boys since he’s a predator hunter. The irony if he would get killed, just like his fans and many other people wish on nonces and pedos.
Filipinos in prison definitely do not give a shit at all about “predator hunters” in fact the concept will be alien to them completely. There was basically no age of consent there until just a few years ago, and the government had to “remind” all of its police that the age of consent was raised from 12 to 16. This applies in practice of course to foreigners first, I’d be surprised if locals were even held to this standard.
Check out Eivind’s new YouTube video, lol: https://theantifeminist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/do-you-catch-my-cultural-drift.mp4
Eivind claims to already be in a relationship with the girl who started talking to him the other day.
He is crediting NoFap for it.
So the first girl he talks to in years (and she talked to him) instantly lands him in a relationship.
I wouldn’t put that down to NoFap. He never had the balls to talk to a girl in all those years, and yet it was apparently all so easy to get a girlfriend if he had only managed to grow a pair earlier.
I wonder if she’s Googled his name yet…
@Anyone, I suppose:
Sorry if I haven’t been contributing lately, but here’s something I would like to share that’s not sexualist related.
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/crime/cape-girardeau-dancing-boy-punched-suspect-sentenced/63-d4c3da89-5c95-4e01-9d98-ea17a33d7eea#
This is from five years ago, so you might’ve remembered it but, basically an African-American man punched a kid dancing on the sidewalk and got SEVEN YEARS!! Let me
repeat that! SEVEN YEARS!! The insanity is unbelievable.
Seven years is absurdly harsh for a single suckerpunch to the face, but we all know the United States (land of the free) loves to hand out egregiously long prison sentences.
Eivind indulging in more psuedo-intellectual nonsense that nobody will read (or make an effort to make sense of – because there isn’t any and they realize he’s a clown). And he’s attacking me again for supposedly ‘thinking in binary terms’ because I’m not a whiteknighting cucked imbecile and can recognize the role women play in our plight.
“For example that the antisex does not need to be thought of as the feminists controlling everything and men being the “good” side which is mysteriously absent from the fight. ”
Nowhere have I said men are “good” or “absent from the fight”. I recognize that women can’t do fuck all without 3 billion men on their side. My point (and I’ve demonstrated it – such as with the NSPCC analysis – to the point even any idiot should be able to see) is that fighting the 200 – 1000 hardcore feminists who are the ultimate source of it all makes a lot more freaking sense than trying to take on 3 billion men, chainsaw wielding anti-vigilante gangs who will gouge your eyes out, 60 million police, etc etc.
Believe me, I hate men for their treachery too, the difference it seems with me is that I can recognize my frontal reptile lobe firing and rationally control it in order to make some possible headway. I can overcome my white knighting instincts so I can criticize feminists and hold them accountable, even if they were sweet little 15 year old girls once too.
Look at the newspaper clippings I just uploaded from 45 years ago. What’s changed since then? Feminism and women now having far more political and economic power. Surely even a white knighting retard can put 2 + 2 together and see that women are more to blame than men? (leaving aside the ‘treachery’ of men or whatever fires up your primitive limbic system).
Eivind is incapable of learning from experience and thus cannot possibly overcome his cringey white knighting instincts. For example, he claimed that “women didn’t vote for this” in relation to some guy getting caged for having sex with an underage teen girl. Then I highlight a survey that found 96% of British women are against 40 year old men having sex even with a legal 16 year old….but he’s incapbable of learning, modifying his stance, or accepting he might be wrong.
Now he claims a “16 year old girl” has suddenly started chatting him up at a bus stop she was observing him from for weeks and is texting him. This a few weeks after he’s been claiming on his blog that he’s a proud sex offender and that the police will leave him alone because they only take part in Aztec rituals for men who are secretive about it.
Any “non-socially challenged” person would proceed with a bit of scepticism and caution here, but to Eivind all he’s thinking is that it ‘proves’ that teen girls are suddenly hot for 40 year olds (so long as they have grown a beard) and that mysterious metaphysical ‘cultural drift’ has swung back the other way.
It’s true.
These menopausal “conservative” feminist women are behind the latest anti-male AI restrictions being pushed by the main political parties.
https://concernedwomen.org/concerned-women-for-america-board-of-trustees/
Thanks Anon69, good research. Well, it doesn’t get more obvious than “concerned women for America” – even Eivind would find it difficult to divert the blame onto men with that one!
I’m concerned about the number of unfuckable women in America!
Now the Berge is literally invoking magic, which he sees as a better tactical approach than combatting the STU.
I’m starting to feel genuine pity for the idiot now. Or I would, if I didn’t realize that all this is half-idocy, and half the hope that he’ll get laid with a female ‘cult follower’. Although the latter is also the result largely of his ‘social deficit’.
“Not that I necessarily believe in all of that either, maybe not when he gets into disembodied spirits, but the way he defines it you can limit your belief to the Standard Model of physics and still you have to believe in magic to some extent. The mass mind has been affected somehow and can theoretically be affected in different ways. Figuring out how is a real science, not something we can dismiss in one word like the “STU” and combat with arguments that do nothing with consciousness because arguments simply don’t have that power no matter how true.”
I think Feldmarshall posted on Evind’s comments section a Tweet from a femihag boasting that raising the age of consent was one of the greatest achievements of feminism.
Eivind the imbecile still thinks it’s “cultural drift”.
I mean what kind of autism prevents you from seeing that “cultural drift” is meaningless as a tactical narrative when we need to stir men to fight feminists who literally freaking started it all and are driving it still today??
Somebody has left another great comment at Eivind’s blog.
“Eivind, it wasn’t a “cultural drift” that brought us here, but feminists; they are literally the cultural drift, which has been demonstrated countless times. It’s all about power over men; it’s always been that way. Today’s so-called “anti-feminists” are feminists who want a different wave of feminism, like conservacucks and the neo-nazis or even men’s and boys’ rights guys. It’s feminism; we never win.
A man who likes teenage girls isn’t a pedophile, not even in a defiant way. You’re not a pedophile. Nobody who isn’t extremely attracted to prepubescent children is a pedophile; that’s the original and true meaning.
A man who is attracted to teenage girls is simply a normal heterosexual man. You’re not special for liking young girls, but for not being a cowardly, self-indulgent, lying pedocrite like 99% of men.
So Predator hunters are useful idiots of feminism and cowardly thugs who look to attack weak targets; they would have been hunting Jews, communists, or homosexuals in another era. There’s nothing mystical about them; they’re just violent pieces of shit like WWII concentration camp guards.”
Eivind can only demonstrate his idiocy in response:
“Does it not feel like a contradiction to claim this is a war between men and women yet there is no men’s group you can join to fight back, except be one of a handful anonymous commenters in a movement of just one public man?”
Ths is like saying that Jews hiding in cellars in 1942 Nazi Germany were wrong to think they were being persecuted by Nazis or Germans, as they had to be anonymous and had no means to fight back.
“It is absurd to say women dictate the whole culture. ”
Remember when Eivind was pretending to be an MRA? It’s basically Men’s Rights 101 to understand that contrary to the myth of patriarchy, women have always determined culture, and certainly do today.
“Also absurd to scream “I am normal” when your position feels too shameful to you to sign your real name to. ”
Again, this is like Jews in 1942 Germany having to accept they are subhuman rats because they’re not sufficiently autistic to walk around displaying their Jewishness to every passing Nazi.
What kind of idiocy and egotism does it require to believe that social change is driven only by “cultural drift”, simply because you personally have failed miserably after 20 years to attract more than 1 or 2 followers with your buffoonary?
The only way to ‘defend’ Eivind at this point is to say that he might not simply be a complete idiot, but rather he’s coming out with this simply because all that matters to him is attracting a chubby female ‘fan’ to his cringey ‘sex cult movement’.
Here’s Eivind painting his new ‘HB9’ girlfriend:
Anon69 is correct in his latest comment on Eivind’s blog.
Feminists (and probably even the police) don’t take Eivind seriously.
In fact, as far as the STU is concerned, he’s effectively working for them.
Claiming that men deserve to go to prison for watching any kind of porn whilst insisting that we should all be chasing HB3 land whales.
And of course denying feminists are even responsible (and certainly not women!), whilst promoting his aspie ‘cultural drift’ theory.
No wonder they turned him into an ‘award winning’ black comedy.
I will be taken seriously, and that is why I (and all of us) have to be more circumspect, because they would love to bring us down.
Addy A-Game, Eddie Hitchens, Johnnie Berba, Tom Torero, Heartiste, Danger and Play (Cernovich), Roosh, all brought down around the same time…
Heartiste: “It is a fact of life that young teenage girls who have developed secondary sexual characteristics are desired by men of all ages, even 90 year olds. And these exquisite nymphets, in turn, desire older men for their power. These desires are natural, and frightening to the keepers of the order. They provoke the envy of the left behind, and so are condemned.”
I honestly don’t know how anybody could be so retarded as not see that women and feminists are the primary cause.
Eivind uses his ‘argument’ again that if it was feminists/the STU they would always have been around.
When have men ever been able to fuck young teen girls without consequences (ie. not have the threat of being responsible for their pregnancy and all that entailed (including a high statistical change of miscarriage or even the girl dying during child birth) as men did for a brief period post pill in the 60’s and 70’s?
When have men ever been able to fly around the world in a few hours for less than one weeks average wage to have sex with hot young foreign women for the price of a (Western) meal?
When have men ever grown up able to see more naked hot females then probably all their male ancestors had previously for the last 100,000 years?
In any case, surely even Eivind can see that if it was men or ‘cultural drift’, why has it happened now, just when women have started to dominate social agendas and gain real political power?
And the STU always has emerged in times of sexual freedom for men, for example the rise of Christianity – which was spread at the grass roots level largely by women (usually women too unattractive to marry – sound familiar?).
Then again, even somebody intelligent like Steve thinks men are more to blame than women. If you’re reading this comment Steve, perhaps you can explain the ‘co-incidence’ of men suddenly deciding after 100,000 years that dating young females is not only wrong, but the worst crime in the world, and that this has no relation to women having substantial political power for the first time in 100,000 years of human existance (as far as we know).
And if even if all the above was crap.
You have to be an autistic imbecile to think that ‘cultural drift’ is a good tactical ‘enemy’ to choose to fight, rather than the feminists who are actually making the fucking anit-sex laws every freaking fucking day!!!!
I mean really that’s the crux of it – at the end of the day, it’s far better to argue against feminist liars in public than it is to defy millions of men professionally trained in carrying out legal violence.
@AF
“If you’re reading this comment Steve…”
First, looks like it’s been a busy week here. A lot of comments.
It is not the first time we have this discussion. Yes, I blame men, too. But I never absolved women from their responsibility for what they have done or their hatred for men’s sexuality and desires which I have also stated in the past. I know that many feminist organizations, which are lead by women, are responsible for many of the laws we are experiencing. I blame men in the sense that they jump on the band wagon, and use it as an excuse to be violent, humiliate people, and quench their blood thirst by claiming to “protect”the “innocent” while showing everyone what a wonderful white knight they are.
For the idea of fighting against millions or billions of men versus a few thousand feminist women in these organizations. You know what my approach for the moment is, you can see it in all my replies I have posted. Letting men know that they are not alone with their attraction to young women, which is totally normal, be it in real life or on the internet. Obviously, in real life you have to use a different approch, and usually have to tone it down. I used many times the comparison between “tradtional” and guerilla warfare. In my opinion, right now, we don’t have enough manpower and support for a traditional fight. There is a reason why I even post here to begin with, to show other readers that there is not just the blog owner (you), but also other people who think that something is not right. There is reason I provided tons of links with you and the others to let everyone there are other people like us, or what is going on, and how bad it’s gotten.
Yes, I did go off on a few rants this week,lol.
Fair enough, I see your point. This is also my aim here too – to set an example, really, and hopefully other men will see they are not alone and that things were not always this way, and might not always be this way in the future – at least if we can keep the struggle (and truth) alive.
I happened to find (on Google) archived messages from Eivind when he was clearly heavily into transhumanism in the early 00s:
https://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/findmsgs.cgi?author=eivind%20berge
Examples:
https://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/dsp.cgi?msg=17101
https://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/dsp.cgi?msg=15947
It makes me wonder even more if has suffered some kind of brain injury in the last decade or so.
Or that perhaps at some point he took on a ‘persona’ for whatever motive when he came into the “manosphere”.
Thinking back to when the IEET’s editor asked me if I wanted to write an article for them, it’s odd that Eivind never expressed any opinion on that at the time (so far as I can remember). In fact, I can’t remember him ever discussing transhumanism.
Eivind thinks another ‘proof’ against the STU view is prisoners attacking sex offenders, which is ‘male culture’.
The imbecile can’t even grasp that most of those ‘sex offenders’ wouldn’t even be in prison if it wasn’t for feminist made laws (supported overwhelmingly by women in significantly greater numbers than men).
It was feminists/women who created the demon ‘paedophile’ figure, and who created hysteria over all ‘sex crimes’. Male prisoners are just taking advantage of that to bully a more vulnerable group and to give themselves some ‘self-esteem’ through feeling they are not the ‘worst’ scum in there.
Yeah, he’s ignoring the source of the pedocrite male behavior, in and out of prison. We know that young males are not having sex nearly as much as previous generations, and this is due to feminism itself. Then, young incels are incentivized by feminists to take out their sexual frustration on older men.
If you look at videos from Thailand on Instagram for example, if there is an older man looking at the young prostitutes, you can count on several pedo smears from frustrated young incels. I also saw a 1st person video where a guy in his 20’s is flirting with an 18 year old on a cold approach, and almost every comment was from pedocrite incels pedo shaming him.
The male jealousy from sexual frustration is off the charts now. But it’s like you said, we can either counter the frustrated males, or counter the male and female feminist liars who are causing the problem to begin with.
One of Eivind’s paedophile ‘followers’ makes his case against the STU:
“What about the conservatives? They’re obviously not jealous of real paedophiles, so the STU completely goes out the window when you consider the many that are obsessed with preserving childhood innocence.”
As any non-aspbergic individual who recognises the beauty of teen girls would realize, conservative age cucks are very much jealous of men who have sex with teen hotties. It’s in their interests just as much as feminists to conflate real paedophilia with normal male attraction to teen girls (something that the sBerge himself is doing of course).
In any case, if you look behind the scenes, most of these anti-sex laws that Republican senators are passing were lobbied for behind the scenes by the femihags (and femiservatives). They’re just desperate for the female vote.
Again, surely one of these imbeciles can try to explain why Conservatives have been in and out of power for decades or even centuries (was the 19th century not ‘conservative’ by modern standards??) and yet these ant-sex laws targetting men invariably happen when feminism is around.
Look at the example of Japan. Surely a complete idiot can recognize that the primary reason why Japan has gone from a sexual utopia for men to virtually the same legall hell-hole as anywhere else in the space of less than two decades, is because of feminism not ‘conservatism’? Are the pedos really saying that Japan has become more ‘conservative’ over the last 15 years, rather than simply more ‘feminist’?
As for his point about Satanic abuse hysteria having nothing to do with the STU, it’s news to me and other MRAs that feminists never had anything to do with that, which served principally to demonize fathers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kee_MacFarlane
BTW, of course I recognize that there are many factors going into the anti(male) sex hysteria, but the STU is the principle one and it’s the most tactically sound narrative we can adopt (compare with ‘cultural freaking drift’ for fffs sake!!).
Imagine the incel community constantly debating and chiding each other for the ‘Chad and Stacey theory being too simplistic’ etc.?
One possible definition of the STU would be this: women prioritize preventing younger and prettier women from putting out over everything else. Even women who can’t or don’t have sex with men strive first and foremost to prevent younger and prettier women to have sex with men.
However, suppose someone who’s never heard of the STU would come up with the following observation about what is happening these days: men prioritize preventing handsomer, alpha males from scoring over everything else. Even men who can’t or don’t have sex with women strive first and foremost to prevent handsomer, alpha males to have sex with women.
Would the latter observer be wrong? Fact is he wouldn’t. That’s where we’re at Today.
I’m not writing this in defence of “cultural drift”. It’s just that STU theory seems to work both ways.
To a degree, but if it were really true Jack, interracial sex would never have become legal. You wouldn’t have millions of young left-wing white men screaming for more and more African and Arab single men to come over and compete (often outcompete) with them sexually. (although they do even that primarily because it will win them favor with hot left-wing young women, so they are in a sense taking advantage of something that will screw over the majority of their peers).
Yes, all these millions of beta men on Twitter and social media screaming for the Epstein files to be released are jealous of the billionaires who allegedly got to bang loads of teen girls. But there’s still nothing like a male equivalent of the female sexual trade union with literally hundreds of lobbying groups dominated by men campaigning to stop better looking or higher status men from having sex. All you have is these cucks on social media throwing pedo accusations at each other (which is as much about scoring political points as regards Epstein) and a relatively tiny underground community of incels.
What is the male equivalent of the NSPCC?
Also, beta men screaming for the (reminder – feminist) age of consent to be applied to Trump and Epstein are themselves restricted by that rule. They’re not saying ‘Trump is a paedo! Execute men who take 16 year old girls shopping!! Now let me at the 14 year old girl next door!!’ On the other hand, feminists raising the age of consent aren’t restricting their own sexual freedoms (obviously). They are increasing their sexual market value and freedoms (leaving aside the Berge fantasy that middle-aged women want to bang young teen boys as much as men want to bang teen girls).
Men calling for feminist laws to be applied to billionaires. There’s a clue in that sentence. Feminists are to the original source.
TBH, I don’t really agree with the idea that anti-sex men are trying to prevent alpha-men from having sex. Seems to me that if you want to blame sex hysteria on men, it’s up until recently been low-status men who were getting punished. In fact, you’ve made that claim yourself many times and even asked why you should care about powerful men getting caught or denied sex with hot females.
But oh well, as I’ve said before – I’m all in favor of you, Evind and his pedos, Steve and everybody else fighting the 60 million policemen in the world, Republican age cucks, pred hunter gangs, the rival cock who looked at you funny in the pub. I’ll fight and try to inspire other men to fight (with words, of course) the 1,000 or so hardcore feminists who are responsible ultimately for 99% of the anti-sex laws. It doesn’t fire up my reptillian limbic system quite so much, but I’ll know to the end of my days that it is mind-blowingly obvious the correct way, and the only possible way with any chance of success.
The paedophile rationalist at Eivind’s blog sounds to me like that ‘(un)original insights’ fella from a while back. I’m surprised he has had the courage to crawl out from under his desk again, although it seems this time he doesn’t want to even have a handle.
“In essence, there is certainly no reason for a feminist be jealous of a male sex offender that committed a child murder, when community outrage already exists in place for them, regardless. Sure, feminists can definitely bandwagon on those particular laws for the sake of their own agendas, but dead children don’t spur modern jealousy over age gaps, that’s for sure.”
Yes, feminists have jumped on the bandwagon. Exactly right you imbecile. It was literally a feminist (Rebekah Wade) who – as editor of the News of the World – successfully lobbied for the introduction of the sex offenders register after the murder of Sarah Payne.
Why wasn’t the sex offenders register introduced or new ‘crackdowns’ on ‘paedophiles’ launched after the Ian Brady/Mrya Hindley murders of teens and kids in the 60’s? Because feminists hadn’t got themselves organized at that point, and weren’t in a position to exploit them for their own ends. All the ‘angry moms and pops’ just saw Hindley and Brady as the evil psychopaths that they were.
At the end of the day , it’s feminists who making these f****ing laws. Sure, if there weren’t 3 billion “angry moms and pops” then we wouldn’t have paedohysteria. Genius insight there. It’s also true if there weren’t 1,000 or so feminists campaigning for these laws, we wouldn’t have these fucking laws. So to any non-aspergic person with their head up their backsides. What is easier? Fighting 1,000 feminists, or 3 billion angry moms and pops??
And it can’t be the STU, because otherwise the STU would always be around through history? But there were no angry moms and pops before 2005?
Eivind and his pedo rationalists:
“Yes, yes, the AF showed that 95% of the NSPCC were feminists, but who is the NSPCC anyway? And could they even have done it without the male janitor opening the office every morning? The STU is too simplistic. Yes, yes, shaming feminists as jealous old hags is effective, but it’s simply beneath us.. The real problem is angry moms and pops. What we need is for Eivind to appeal to the billions of moms and pops in the world through naked shower YouTube videos in which he regrets the death of a man infamous for rape forums and who ran off with a 12 year old girl against her parents wishes! This is sure to work!!”
Feldmarshall the paedophile loon crying that some of the incels think the age of consent should be 14-16 rather than 8.
Yeah, lucky I’ve never slept with an underage girl, even the 14 year old German girl I met over a decade ago and who claimed I caused her low self-esteem issues because I wouldn’t get physical with her, and even though it would have been perfectly legal for me to have banged her brains out.
Feldmarshall was probably really enraged by this thread: https://incels.is/threads/age-of-consent-is-racist-feminist-garbage.783144/
“The dysgenic trait of raising AOC to 18, began with this organization.
Women’s Christian Temperance Union”
Wow!
OK, I made the mistake of looking at the Berge’s blog again and saw he is using the ‘gay men treated worse’ argument again to ‘prove’ STU theory is false. Anonymous2 has rightly objected to this.
Berge may as well argue that homosexuals being hanged (or rather pederasts) 150 years ago proves STU is false.
First of all, I don’t agree with that study (Rind I think) that gay men are treated more unfairly than heterosexual men who have sex with underage teens. Homosexuals have long known to be more violent, abusive, forceful, ‘decieving’ etc.,(and definitely more promiscuous) so it wouldn’t be surprising if they do on average receive longer sentences.
Secondly, they should receive longer sentences, because anally banging a 14 year old boy who has just started puberty and is unsure about his sexuality, IS MUCH MORE SERIOUS than a heterosexual man banging a 14 year old slut who started puberty 3 or 4 years perviously and is pretty much a young woman already.
In any case though, ‘homophobia’ has always been around, and the only outlet for it these days is when homosexuals break feminist age of consent laws. The key point that the Berge simply can’t grasp is that feminists made these laws (and we know why they made them) and homosexuals have to suffer from them too. Feminists probably don’t give a shit about homosexuals banging teen boys, but they would have to be open about their STU motives if they gave homos a pass. Not to mention the numbjer of times I have tried to explain here why feminists co-opted homosexuals by helping them to ‘become legal’ at the price of accepting and validating feminist age of consent laws.
Funnily enough, homosexuals are absolutely aware of the STU motives, as homos are rarely autistic. This is why gay ‘MAPs’ so often appeal to feminists that the ‘patriarchal imblance of power’ and such crap ‘does not apply to man boy relationships’. Lol.
In any case, if gay men supposedly getting longer sentences is an argument against STU theory, why isn’t equally an argument against “cultural drift” too?
Eivind finally realizes that he’s going to spend his entire adult working life on welfare:
“For every AI “solution” there is an AI adversary to cancel it out. If I were the only one with AI in the word I could make a fortune as a writer or artist or coder or whatever, but since everyone has it I can’t make a single penny.”
In ten years time there will likely be (expensive) rejuvenation technology available. Eivind will probably even have his welfare cut as there will be so many people unemployed because of AI, governments will have to reduce each welfare cheque to the bare minimum. Meanwhile, people who worked and invested in the likes of Nvidia will be able to turn back into their 20 year old selves and chase the hotties again.
Maybe at that point we will be clubbing together to buy Eivind a sex robot, although he probably would have had his electricity cut off by then. He will still be saying that AI is overhyped too.
https://www.clinicaltrialvanguard.com/news/life-biosciences-unveils-new-data-on-epigenetic-reprogramming-at-ardd-2025/
Now Eivind is championing a right-wing femihag because she’s crusading against ‘wankers’.
https://unherd.com/newsroom/the-right-should-celebrate-the-online-safety-acts-success/
https://thecritic.co.uk/author/josephine-bartosch/
Eivind has a new blog post.
It’s quite good, until he starts talking about activism and tactics again like a blind person arrogantly telling people that when they see blue, they are actually seeing green.
“After 25 years taking sexuality’s side I not only failed to change anyone’s opinion but didn’t even make anyone think, if they didn’t already agree with me, which only one in a million does, all of them too cowardly to be public about it either.”
And yet there is no possibility in Eivin’d’s mind that he could be even slightly at fault, that he might have just taken the wrong approach. At least three exposures in the national (and even international) limelight, blogging under his own name (which he is so proud about), and yet he has at most one or two followers after 25 years, who rarely comment on his blog and who are so ‘cowardly’ they wont even choose a username to do so.
“I would call it a female sexual trade union like the AF clique singlemindedly obsess over aside from the fact that THERE IS NO NOTABLE MALE OPPOSITION, unless you want to call me (or the AF) notable, or at least call the incels notable, which they are not as anything but a subject of derision. This is an elephant in the room that needs to be addressed, sincerely.”
The main reason for this is that our small number has failed to wake up men to the fact that feminists/women are the enemy. At least I’ve tried. It is, of course, futile due to the white knighting instinct in men. Even here it’s like hitting one’s head against a brick wall. “yes, yes, it’s a hardcore group of feminists making all the laws, but they couldn’t do it without 60 million armed police and 3 billion men so we need to fight the 60 million armed police and the 3 billion men! And it’s cruel to call feminists hags anway. They were teen girls once too!!”.
But Eivind hasn’t even tried. In fact, he’s done the reverse and consistently tried to convince men that its men who are at fault (or ‘cultural drift’, or ‘Aztec magic spells’, and that women are somehow the biggest victims. It’s like a Jewish leader in 1930s Germany telling his people that Nazis or Germans are not the real enemy, that it’s “cultural drift”, and then saying that the fact there is no Jewish opposition to the Nazis ‘proves’ that he is right and “cultural drift” is the cause rather than the Nazis or Germans.
Eivind would have a much better blog if he just stuck to analyzing literature or talking about how it feels to be living in a mad anti-sex world. In other words, just recognize that he is not any kind of “leader” or tactical guru, and instead just a well-read person who can see the madness, and feel the pain of (some) current anti-sex laws.
Now Eivind is telling George Orwell how he could have made 1984 better – by having Winston prove hiw theory that magic spells wil make the police ignore you.
“A better anti-dystopian novel would explore this kind of magic and be more closely aligned with our times.”
I’d be interested to know what MH makes of crap like this:
” So instead of hoping for some kind of utopia or fearing an invincible dystopia either we should practice as much magic as is real to have the best lives now, for which JMG is a great teacher whom I have been following for about 12 years now. I now do believe in magic, properly defined as the art and science of effecting changes in consciousness in accordance with will. When applied to your own consciousness it is the same thing as the pickup artists used to call inner game, which we know can in turn effect changes in others’ consciousness too and help us get what we want. And it is unbelievably powerful against the police since most of their power is predicated on people believing they will get caught.”
To put it in very simple (and vulgar) words, I would say it means: FUCK ‘EM AND THEIR LAW !
At least it is way, I’ve understood it.
Problem with it is:
1. If you have problem with certain societal norms/laws out of principle, just because such norms exits-fact that you could break them is useless for you.
2. You must be bloody good “Copperfield” to not end up (at the end of the day)with 30 cm fellow inmate’s in your arse.
Agreed.
I think it’s also a inverted form of ‘virtue signalling’ on his part – ‘unvirtue signalling’ if you like, without any substance.
Eivind is terrified of breaking the law (as I am, admittedly). He knows he’ll never even have the opportunity to score with a teen, given his age, social awkwardness, and more importantly, the fact that he’s publicly a ‘proud paedophile’ and that doesn’t exactly make you a catch for most girls these days. Not to mention that, despite what he says, even he must understand on some level he is being watched and that the police wouldn’t leave him alone because “they don’t have fun hunting somebody who doesn’t hide.”
He’s so terrified of breaking the law that he rationalizes avoiding looking at any kind of porn, lest he stumbles upon something illegal, as ‘NoFap’, despite it clearly not having any benefit to his life (for example, enabling him to approach women).
He could easily break Norwegian law with a weekend in Warsaw or Prague on a cheap flight to bang a hooker for 30 euros, but he wont even do that.
So he feels a coward (and perhaps he is given Norwegian prisons are literal holiday camps) and copes with it by publicly expressing his wish to break the law, knowing that he isn’t going to.