*Update August 2025: I completely dissociate myself from the paedophile blogger Eivind Berge. I disagree with him over almost everything. I have never had any communication with him other than as a former commentator at his blog (before he came out as a paedophile), and only did so because for a long time he was posing as an MRA who was speaking out on the criminalization of normal male sexuality. I COMPLETELY DISTANCE MYSELF FROM HIS REAL PAEDOPHILIA, HIS COMMENTS ON SEX OFFENDING ETC.
First of all, I should point out, or rather admit, that I do feel sometimes like I’m almost bullying him by constantly leaving critical comments at his site. This makes me uncomfortable, especially after the suicide of the PUA ‘Johnny Berba‘ recently, whose death affected me quite a bit, and who was subjected to some online ridicule over the years. In fact, one of the reasons I have come back to blogging is that it means I will no longer need to comment at Eivind’s blog – something that I’d rather not do anyway as it is now a bonafide pedo blog. Again though, that’s not to say I want to be criticizing him all the time here either. Having said that, somebody who identifies asa ‘proud paedophile’ clearly has a thick skin, to say the least, so I doubt if my criticisms of him are anything more than an irritation. And, as you will see below, I feel it is my right, or rather my obligation to criticize him, as he sets himself up as the self-annointed ‘leader’ of our non-existant movement. He claims to speak for me, and other long-time activists such as ‘Jack’.
So let’s get to the heart of the matter. There are few people out of the billions on this planet who are speaking out against insane feminist anti-sex laws. I am one of those people. Eivind is one of these people too. And yet, he often forces me to almost hate him. How can this be? Well, this is why.
He literally calls himself ‘leader’ of our ‘movement’. Before that, he believed he had a special power to annoint others as ‘leader’.
There is no ‘movement’, and there is no ‘leader’. A handful of people commenting on his blog (often disagreeing with him) does not make a movement. His principle justification for calling himself a leader appears to be that he is ‘public’, which he is very proud of (and more of that later). Before he decided to annoint himself as the chosen one, he did the same for a potential false flag (or simply clumsy individual) named Tom Grauer (who was more than happy to accept). Our ‘movement’, which appears to consist of a few individuals, seems to attract very egotistical people. I cannot recall the Men’s Rights Movement, which has or did have tens of thousands of followers, ever choosing a ‘leader’. Paul Elam, who was certainly egotistical, may have acted like a leader, but he never called himself one, and I can’t recall more than a handful of MRAs ever claiming that he was. Similarly, the incels have never had a ‘leader’ (although Elliott Rodger may be a kind of ‘saint’ to many of them). For that matter, the gay rights movement, the trans rights movement has never had a ‘leader’. Even the MAPs do not have a ‘leader’.
Eivind’s need to call himself a ‘leader’ appears not just to be ego driven in the sense that he needs validation from ‘followers’, but is perhaps an even more insidiuous and treacherous attempt to get laid with a ‘female fan’ (more below).
Constantly Boasts Of Being ‘Public’, Whilst Chiding Everybody Else For ‘Cowardice’
One of the reasons, or THE reason Eivind thinks he is entitled to call himself a ‘leader’, despite having only one or two readers who see him as such, is because he is public with his activism. He is very proud of this, and constantly chides others for being anonymous. Ironically, the only thing his one, two, or three(?) ‘followers’ have in common is that they refuse to even adopt unique identifying usernames when commenting on his blog. He may only have one ‘follower’ – it’s really impossible to know. But it sure is cringey – like most things about him.
What’s most grating about this proud boast of Eivind is that he seems oblivous to the fact that Norway is one of the few countries, or is perhaps the only country in the world, where ‘public activism’ in this regard is not suicidal. He also appears oblivious to the dangers that such public activism present to himself even in Norway. He was genuinely surprised (and even wrote a blog post on it) to discover that the rare Tinder matches with chubbies he was getting would invariably ghost him after Googling his name and discovering that he was a ‘proud paedophile’ who believed that ‘rape is equality’. He makes videos that potentially give away his location. This mirrors that other paedophile activist ‘Amos Yee’, who was similarly public and then surprised when he got beaten up in a shopping center.
It’s also not clear what benefit being public has brought himself or to any cause of male sexual rights. He claims that it has gained him media exposure. His first real episode of national (and even international) exposure was when he was arrested for threatening to stab police officers on his blog. Note that although he used his real name on his little known blog, his identity would obviously have been revealed had he chosen to blog anonymously, through his arrest and subsequent trial. On the back of this media attention, and many years later, he was invited to take part in a Norwegian documentary on Incels and other ‘angry young online men’. As Eivind was no longer young, and not even so angry, the documentary makers clearly had him on to reassure the public that these angry young men will eventually just turn into harmless middle-aged eccentrics like Eivind. It was clearly a ‘comic light relief’ interval segment. Eivind, dressed in a cardigan on a hot summer’s day, hardly mentioned male sexuality, but was invited to showcase his absurd ‘Fertile Dating’ attempt at a co-parenting matchmaking site, and present it to a panel of business experts (who spent the entire time trying to surpress their laughter).
His next enounter with ‘fame’ remains his proudest moment. After watching his performance on the Incel documentary, a feminist filmmaker read his blog and decided he would make the perfect subject of a black comedy. So she got in touch with Eivind and they met several times to discuss the project – meetings which Eivind proudly refers to as ‘dates’. The film was made, and portrayed Eivind as a mentally ill loner with erectile dysfunction problems, and who finally finds sexual happiness in a sex doll brothel. Nevertheless, Eivind was extremely proud of it, especially when ‘his film’ won a prize at the Cannes Film Festival, with the panel of judges explicitly stating that they giggled throughout the screening. Eivind put down his ‘success’ to his genius move of making YouTube videos naked in his shower whilst praising a man who was jailed for abducting a 12 year old girl.
In tangible benefits, it has maybe brought him 2 or 3 Norwegian readers to his blog, although he/they sometimes claim that they followed him since his original arrest. According to the SEO analysis tool SemRush, his blog has around 5 visitors a day. His YouTube channel, despite being in his real name, has 140 or so subscribers, and his videos only get 2 or 3 likes each.
So it’s not clear at all why there is a benefit to being public. No doubt if he didn’t come across as an autistic weirdo, then he might have a case. Somebody with the looks and charisma of Andrew Tate clearly benefits from being ‘public’. Somebody like Matt Forney, who was far more successful when blogging anonymously as ‘Ferdinand Bardemu (InMalaFide), doesn’t. Eivind certainly doesn’t.
Finally, and most seriously, it appears that being public may have affected his integrity, to say the least. Just as with his ‘coparenting’ site Fertile Dating, he openly admits he wants to get laid through ‘his movement’, the name of which he has single-handedly changed from ‘Male Sexualism’ to just ‘Sexualism’ in order to attract a horny female fan. Despite having low or non-existing standards when it comes to choosing a partner, his only girlfriend in the last 20 years was a female fan called Emma who followed his blog and hooked up with him as a result. He is clearly hoping that lightening will strike twice. Back then, at least he was an angry young man. Emma was an attractive young woman of Slavic origin who would normally be out of Eivind’s league, but who apparently had a fetish for omega males. He claims that he dumped her a few years ago because she didn’t want to have children, probably expecting a new fan would replace her soon enough. It didn’t happen. That hasn’t prevented Eivind from changing the name of the movement, or from refusing to accept that women in general have any responsibility for the present war on male sexuality, in order to make himself attractive to any potential ‘second Emma’.
Accepts The Feminist Paedophile Slander And Is Tactically Clueless
When it comes to tactics, Eivind is like a blind man leading an army into battle. This is a man who is surprised that being public with activism such as claiming that ‘rape is equality’ leads to fewer dating oportunities with the opposite sex. This is a man who thinks that a coparenting website with a HTML school project design and competing with an established site that has 100K+ members, whilst publicly declaring himself a ‘proud paedophile’ and defending the right of a father to sodamize his son, whilst openly stating he himself is looking to get women pregnant through his own site, might actually become the next million dollar tech startup, with investors flooding in. This is a man who thinks that making YouTube videos naked in the shower will get him listened to by ‘serious people’. This is a man who thinks AI is overhyped, who started learning code AFTER ChatGPT in his forties, and who waits earnestly for ‘peak oil’ and the collapse of Industrial Civilization. This is a man who used to mine Bitcoin when it was worth peanuts, and then came to the conclusion it was ‘overhyped’, and sold it all for peanuts, amounts that would have made him a billionaire, and who still thinks he made the right decision. So it’s hardly a surprise that when it comes to formulating tactics for our ‘movement’, the man is a literal imbecile.
Eivind has alienated just about every demographic that we are likely to have any hope of winning to our cause in order to form a base of a real movement. He’s pissed off virtually every MRA with his cringey white knighting obsession with the ‘female sex offender charade’. That is, almost every other article he’s published in the last decade on his blog has been concerned with the latest female teacher to be denied the pussy pass for sucking off 13 year old Tyrone’s BBC in class. He’s pissed off every potential Incel recruit by calling them ‘losers’ (whilst describing himself as an ‘alpha male Chad!’), despite any imbecile seeing that the Incel movement is the obvious place where an anti-feminist male sexual consciousness is emerging. He’s pissed off every one of the millions of potential porn lover recruits by calling them ‘wankers’ over and over again, despite any imbecile realizing that with advances in porn tech, feminists will be ‘forced’ to criminalize ever increasing millions of men.
I can’t recall Eivind making a single practical and useful tactical suggestion in the near 20 years he has been blogging. His only ‘goal’ for the ‘movement’ is to see the collapse of Industrial Civilization, something he believes will follow inevitabily from ‘peak oil’, and which will ‘spite feminists’. Although he mentions feminists a lot and claims to see that they are in some way responsible for sex laws, he refuses to accept any form of ‘Sexual Trade Union theory’, ‘green pill’, or ‘pussy cartel’ theories (all much the same), and instead refers to ‘cultural drift’ as an explanation. This may be because he’s genuinely an imbecile, but it’s more likely, as mentioned above, that he simply doesn’t want to blame women lest it reduces his chances of getting laid with a female fan. In any case, any tactical suggestion he has put forward, such as..ahem…’fighting the police’, ‘registering voluntarily as sex offenders’, ‘breaking sex laws’ etc. would only even make sense if we had at least hundreds of thousands of followers, rather than a handful.
But the most seriously inept and tactical crime of Eivind Berge is his submissive acceptance of the feminist paedophile slander. He now refers to himself as a ‘proud paedophile’. Not even identifying himself as an aspie ‘MAP’ is enough for him. He is a proud paedo. He justifies this on the basis that ‘words mean whatever people say they mean’. Here, he simply demonstrates his place on the spectrum again. Words have numerous shades of meaning, differences in context, differences in the speaker’s intention and even ‘motive’. The word paedophile might be used these days even to describe a man with a 19 year old girlfriend, but it is a case of the original and true meaning of the word – a pervert with a preference for little kids – being exploited by feminists in order to shame normal male sexuality. Eivind can’t see this. It’s as though Martin Luthar King accepted that he was a ‘proud nigger’, or even a ‘proud slave’, because white racists called him it.
Eivind is now officially a neckbeard, lol!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE0t4R6cKlc
At least he’s looking happy. Perhaps the 16 year old chubby is still texting him after all.
Eivind has commented on this case of a female teacher jailed for 51 years for “assaulting” a mini-Tyrone.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/38271227/teaching-assistant-sexually-assaulted-boy-jailed/
Whilst I agree that 51 years for virtually any “sex crime”, even real ones is absurd, he completely ignores the fact that she texted the Tyrone “demanding that he apologize” – I presume she was attempting to falsely accuse him of assaulting her. Either that or her arrogance must have been through the roof that she could have underage sex with a student and then demand that he apologize for whatever reason.
Also this from Eivind: ” She looks very good for her age too, must have been 10/10 while young and I would still give her an 8 at 34, which is extremely rare! Lucky boy indeed!”
I mean seriously, he appears to lack any capacity to discern real beauty. I assume he would give her 10/10 if she put on 30 lbs in weight.
And:
“At least some of the comments are still sane!
Peter Walker
19 February, 2026
When I was young all I got was a bike!
Noel Mcloughlin
2 days ago
Oh they will live with it for the rest of their lives all right , when they are telling their mates about it for the 1000th time”
Eivind can’t even ask why women aren’t leaving comments like that underneath articles calling Epstein or Andrew a paedophile and most evil man in history.
When do you see a woman leave a comment like: “Abused survivors for getting to date a literal Prince at 17 – I’d be telling my besties for the 10000th time and they’ want to rip me to shreds they would be so jealous!”
Answer – never in a million years.
If only Eivind and the pedoberges had the intellectual capacity to ask why that is.
I’ve seen the tradcucks argue that it’s different for young women than for young men, that young women are ruined by sex. Just more white knighting for the STU. Whoremaxxer is right that a large contingent of men are hopelessly low T, maybe we should start dumping steroids into the water supply. But the better idea is obviously to get away from Angloworld and attack feminists and women for running the show.
The Paedoberge for Palestine cries tears for a 38 YO “HB8” getting caught banging an underage Tyrone, but has no sympathy for thousands of beautiful young Iranian women being flogged and beaten by femislamist morality police for showing their hair in public.
I’ll say it again, even if you all disagree with me. There is one group on Earth that has been demonized and persecuted throughout history as much as “paedopbiles” are being today and that’s the Jews. That is why paedophiles like Berge and O’Caroll take the side of the Arabs and Iranians instead of looking to Jews as inspiration – because Jews especially in war, highlight how pathetic the paedophile “resistance” has been. If the Jews were autistic clueless paedopbiles like them, they wouldn’t even have gotten around to seeing the Mullahs of Iran as their enemy, despite decades of threatening to wipe them off the map and funding proxy militias including Hamas. Berge would blame the incoming Iranaian missiles on Cultural Drift and insist the fact that a Palestinian Arab was killed by one was proof of it. He would also convert to Islam and call himself a proud Muslim thinking he is doing something “defiant” and “drawing blood with every word.”
Anyway, I just find it hard to side with Iran knowing hag STU morality police are going round and beating pretty young girls for showing skin or for premarital sex. Even if in some sense Iran amd Islam is “anti-feminist” and I’m all in favor of women having fewer “rights”.
What infuriates me is the proganda presenting Iranian women as the heroins in the opposition to the Mullahs. This is a blatant misrepresentation:
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/02/iran-children-among-30-people-at-risk-of-the-death-penalty-amid-expedited-grossly-unfair-trials-connected-to-uprising/
I only see men in this death row.
Some of us who are old enough remember the mass demonstrations in Iran that led to the downfall of the Shah and Ayatollah Khomenei’s enthronement. The demonstrating crowds were women. A deluge of ghostly shapes, veiled in black from head to foot.
Yes it’s a complete myth that men are the biggest supporters of Islam. I remember Angry Harry refering to studies that showed women in Muslim countries are happier tham both Muslim men AND women in Western countries.
I was in Cyprus last week. I wish I’d stayed an extra week so I could say I had been in a war zone, lol. The girls there are absolutely beautiful.
I think a big reason Eivind has such a blind spot regarding women’s bad intentions and the sex laws might be due to significantly more cultural equality between the sexes in Norway.
As a benchmark to measure how “cucked” a culture is, we can use sentence disparity data between the genders for the same exact crimes. Turns out that Norway, and Scandinavia in general, is one of the most equal sentencing countries in the world. Compare that with the UK, which has a significantly higher anti-male sentence disparity. And the USA, especially the federal government (important because the Department of Homeland Security is the federal government, which declared incels to be a terrorist threat), is well documented as being one of the worst countries in the world for gender sentence disparity, with men receiving 60% more prison time than women in one study alone (even when controlling for variables like criminal history and aggravating circumstances).
When your country has a misandrist culture where men are considered unofficially second class citizens at best, and slaves for women at worst, it is much easier to see the feminine hand in the sex laws.
“Now Trump wants to go back to those good times where the Epstein Files are the biggest problem, but it’s out of his hands now. He did his phony mission accomplished speech but nobody is buying it except the markets temporarily lowered the oil price. If Iran is wise they will keep the Strait of Hormuz closed and keep bombing American interests until the US is forced to leave the Middle East in shame and Israel is properly adjusted as well.”
Lol, the pedoberge is funny. I’m sure Iran is paying attention to the imbecile who thinks he can create a successful co-parenting site whilst publicly proclaiming himself as a “proud paedophile” and defending fathers anally fucking their 10 year old sons, or who never fails to be surprised when his 1 in 1,000 matches on Tinder ghost him after Googling his name, or thinks taking up the study of coding at 45 in 2025 so he can become a freelancer in 2030 when tens of thousands of graduate-level coders already can’t get work or are being laid off every month.
There would be nothing left of Iran if the bombing campaign lasted for months, but the pedoberge doesn’t care if tens or hundreds of thousands of Iranians die, just as he doesn’t care about the tens of thousands of young people the Iranian regime killed a couple of months ago. So long as Western Civilization (which survived WW2, the bubonic plague, the mongols, the collapse of the Roman Empire) mysteriously collapses with oil going above $100 a barrel, leading to the deaths of hundreds of millions and the rest reduced to stone age subsistance.
But Eivind is no doubt “sure” that the Norwegian government would be able to continue writing his welfare cheque every month. Hopefully Tinder would still work too.
Eivind still scratching his head as to why neither Donald Trump nor the Supreme Leader of Iran has followed his example and stood up and declared themselves to be proud paedophiles.
https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2026/02/reeling-from-epstein-scandal.html?showComment=1773311445711#c2994039467164963271
And the great tactical leader’s only strategic goal for his “movement” is to be killed along with everybody else in the world so he can see “anti-sex bigots suffer.”
Pure cringe.
Poor old Eivind has had an internship cancelled after his potential employers Googled his name and discovered that he’s a “proud paedophile” who thinks he can openly state his intention to have underage sex, is infamous for stating “rape is equality”, was arrested for threatening to stab police officers (and subsequently Norway changed their law as a result), defends fathers fucking their 10 year old sons, and makes YouTube videos naked in the shower lamenting the death of Nathan Larson who had run off with a 12 year old girl.
I mean, who would have thought it????? They cancel you over literally nothing these days!!!!!!
“And now even I managed to get cancelled for my opinions in support of Epstein. It’s no big deal for me as I never really had any positions worth a damn, but now I am preemptively cancelled from getting an unpaid internship because potential employers googled me and read my latest blog posts”
https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2026/03/i-got-cancelled-too.html
I think more than just your opinions on Epstein, Eivind.
When the same thing happens to the next job application, and the next, and the next 1 in a 1000 chubby who matches him on Tinder ghosts him after Googling him, he’ll again be 100% surprised and still call us all losers and cowards for not being a “proud public paedophile” like him.
If this isn’t “autism” then the word “autism” literally has no meaning or application. If there was a global competition for “high functioning autism” Eivind would probably win it (if you consider spending your entire adult life on welfare to be “high functioning”, or being a “public proud paedophile” and thereby giving yourself zero chance of ever getting a job (even an unpaid job!) or a girlfriend (and not to mention giving your location away in every YouTube video you make)).
And no, he’s not couragous, he’s just autistic. Michael Tracey is courageous, because he understands all the hate and problems that will come his way (including probably damaging his journalistic career).
BTW, I’m not saying I agree with him being cancelled – it would be a nice world if everybody was free to publicly say all the things Eivind says without any consequences. But how much of an imbecile do you have to be to be unable to recognize we do not live in such a world?
Eivind is back in the shower…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpZWyHSTw0Q
I wonder why he thinks coming across as a mentally ill weirdo helps our cause in the slightest way?
And he seriously thought ANY company on Earth would employ him?
Not that it will get more than 30 or 40 views, but something tells me that nobody would be convinced to watch Michael Tracey after that recommendation. Hell, if Michael Tracey sees it, he might even start to question himself.
Holy shit, that video is a total freak show, couldn’t watch more than 30 seconds, too much cringe. This guy is not helping us at all with that garbage. It’s good he’s a pedophile supporter now instead of an anti-feminist, normal men watching that video will be completely repulsed.
Indeed it is. But when Eivind looks in the mirror, or watches his own videos, he must somehow see a handsome looking “eccentric”. He certainly lacks any “cringe detection” system in his brain.
It’s sad really, because for a time up until his arrest and for a while afterwards (even more so) he had an “angry young man” dignity and appeal (that’s why he could even attract a female “fan” as a girlfriend).
Then he became increasingly obsessed with white knighting for female sex offenders and since Emma the Emu finally left him and he became completely isolated, it’s been a downward spiral into madness, quite frankly.
I see even “Amelio” is trying to talk some sense into him, but it’s useless.
When I was thinking of ways Eivind could make some money last week, I thought he should sue that feminist who made a black comedy out of him. Not because they misrepresented him or for defamation – they didn’t. But because they clearly exploited somebody who is mentally ill.
Eivind defending his cringey, crazy looking beard: “Well, if that’s what my beard conveys then at least I have a symbol of aggression even though I have nothing else. Aggression can be attractive; total submission is definitely not the image I want to project.”
He is literally doing these weirdo naked shower videos because he’s proud that a feminist noted how hilariously cringey they were and made an arty film making fun of his mental illness to further her career and so her feminist arty friends could laugh at the best the “male sexualist” opposition could offer. Also, because one of the videos (the Nathan Larsson video) went somewhat viral as the ultimate in revolting cringefest and so attracted a few thousand haters to gawp at him, and his autistic brain somehow reads that as a “success”.
Meanwhile, embracing the paedophile slander 100%.
What a clueless paedosperge he is.
After two weeks of painful cognitive dissonance trying to understand why the Iranians are putting messages about Epstein onto their missiles, the supreme tactical genius Eivind has finally worked out that they may simply be using Epstein hysteria as a propaganda tool in their existential struggle against the USA and Israel.
Now Eivind thinks his cancellation (which somehow surprised the imbecile) disproves STU theory because he reckons it was the males on the agency panel who most wanted him cancelled.
“anon69 brings in the female sexual trade union again, but once again it contradicts my experience. To my knowledge all the people pushing my cancellation were men while two women (the NAV representatives) were skeptical.”
What an autistic imbecile.
Imagine being such an imbecile that you think at the age of 48, when graduates are almost unemployable as coders now, that despite being a public “proud paedophile”, despite once facing a student petition to kick you out of university when you were a student for your argument that “rape is equality”, despite being arrested for threatening to stab police officers and being briefly nationally famous, despite stating repeatedly of his intention to break sex laws and claiming that the police will leave him alone because “there is no sport in hunting those who don’t hide”, despite making YouTube videos naked in the shower defending child abduction, had a Cannes award winning black comedy depicting him as the mentally ill wanker that he is, and despite growing a freakishly long unkempt beard, seemingly genuinely believing that:
1/you could get through a part-time college course and be accepted by the employment agency that sponsored it when they discover all of the above.
2/ Companies would be queing up to employ you, despite perfoming background checks.
3/ That you would earn enough money to go to SE Asia to get sex (and not be arrested at border control).
4/ That you would eventully be able to obtain a visa to live in SE Asia.
The only thing that’s surprised me is that it appears nobody on his course Googled him – neither students nor staff. That’s probably because he didn’t even talk to anybody, above all the females (leaving aside that 16 year old girl at the bus stop who mysteriously initiated a conversation with him and gave him her number, and no doubt moved to another country when SHE Googled his name, lol).
His cancellation was nothing to with raising SMV or jealous hags (in itself), it was the fact obvious to anybody not ridiculously autistic that no company on Earth would risk its reputation employing somebody like him. How clueless do you have to be to be unable to see that? If it was men who were calling for his “cancellation” it just means they were more competent than the women (not that they probably were more against him – Eivind probably fantasizes that the women were admiring his beard).
This is a hilarious comment. At this point Eivind’s best bet is working for the government somehow.
I’d suggest there is at least a 50% chance that he already is.
BTW, thanks for the appreciation you expressed in a previous comment recently. I couldn’t reply to it because the nested threads had reached their max limit.
Hope you guys like the new edit comment feature. The box is a bit small (at least on my browser) but maybe I can widen it. It’s enough for a simply spelling mistake or such like to fix anyway.
Of course! Yeah the new edit comment feature is a good idea.
Let’s just for the sake of argument say the following are the “causes” of anti-heterosexual male sex hysteria (Eivind ignores PRIDE marches, slut walks, female vibrators sold openly in high-street stores, trannies going into schools to teach 5 year olds about “gender fluidty and the like – somehow “cultural drift” has decided to leave all them untouched):
10% Sexual Trade Union/female sexual jealousy and bitterness
10% Men.
10% Angry Moms and Pops
10% American Puritanism
10% Failure to cast magic spells to appease the Aztec Gods
50% Cultural Drift
How the feck do you fight cultural drift? As we’ve been highlighting in “Preserving the Past”, only 50 years ago and the Western World was completely different. You had the most popular movie franchise in Germany being erotic “documentaries” about real schoolgirls, showing teachers having relationships with 14 year olds and naked 16 year olds etc. Sweden made “ilicit images” unillicit. The age of consent in the Netherlands dropped to 12. Even in the UK, the Sun was showing topless 16 year olds every day rather than inciting the hunting of men dating 17 year olds. Bands like the Rolling Stones were getting more teenage pussy than the “Epstein class” put together, and everybody knew it (and admired them for it).
Leaving aside the utter retardness of thinking that we could have gone from all that to today, a world in which 30 year old men are being hounded as “paedophiles” for dating 21 year olds and the entire planet is consumed by billionaires getting massages off of borderline legal teens, simply by a mysterious force called “cultural drift”, how could you possibly fight such a mysterious AND powerful force? Oh yea, I forgot, make naked videos showing your puny body off whilst calling Nathan Larsson a martyr and allow a feminist to further her career by making a black comedy about your utter cringiness. That will sure turn back the tide of cultural drift!
Again, all I know is that whether STU is 10% of the cause of our plight, they make up 90% of the NGOs and lobbyists who are making 99% of the laws that are causing us hell and leading us into the abyss. Yeah, they couldn’t do it wihout men, they couldn’t do it perhaps even without “cultural drift” or the anger of Aztec Gods, they couldn’t do it without the correct ratio of carbon dioxide and hydrogen in the atmosphere etc. But I say again, if you think there is any other strategic option than opposing the relatively small number of feminists making all the laws, then yes, Eivind is your soulmate.
Definitely. A wall of shame webpage with the names of the top 20+ evil NGO leaders could be very useful. You can even leave comments turned off on the page so nothing that could be construed as threatening could be said.
That’s a good idea Anon69.
The problem is, I’ve clearly been virtually blacklisted by Google. It might have been because of the years the domain was pointing to Sabrina Vaz OnlyFans, or because they have clamped down on “heretical” content.
I’ve been back online for over a year now and still get 1 or 2 Google hits a day, compared to hundreds back in the day. For the “naming and shaming” of femihags to succeed (like it did in the old days of this blog), I’d probably have to start another site.
For example, if you type “Eivind Berge” into Google, this page doesn’t even rank, despite having over 200 comments.
However, there’s nothing stopping you guys creating your own sites, even hosted on Blogger for example. The best I can do here (aside from providing a resource and something of a “forum”) is to provide a template and encourage you to “go forth and multiply”.
BTW, this is a good read: https://x.com/arctotherium42/status/2037324942069342679
“The closure of the Internet 2009-2015”
In particular about Google censorship: https://x.com/arctotherium42/status/2028256351512662349
Eivind now says he is going to put a link to his blog on his CV when applying for jobs, lol!
On a serious note, people like “Amelio” should not be encouraging him in his fantasies. If Eivind can’t learn from this, then he really is going to put himself in danger eventually. You’re not helping him.
Pederasts like Brian Ribbon and Christopher Isherwood fantasize about cutting their enemies up into a thousand pieces.
Eivind Berge fantasizes about getting sympathy sex for white knighting for his enemy who literally wants him cut up into a thousand pieces.
Eivind defending “zoos” now.
I do worry about his poor cat. I hope that’s not how he manages to stick to “NoFap”.
The proud paedophile still blaming culture in the hope a female fan will let him unleash 7 years of NoFap on her, because, although he defends sex with toddlers and “zoos”, he’s not a misogynist.
If you go back as recently as the 90s, and “culture” wasn’t anti-sex or anything like as man hating. In the UK we had anti-feminist “lad culture” and middle-aged male celebs were counting down the days until they could legally bang female celebs about to turn 16.
The only reason “culture” changed (and it happened almost overnight) was because of feminists, and the women who supported them (and voted for feminist left-wing government such as Tony Blair’s “New Labour”.
For example, the feminist editor of the News of the World (Rebekkah Wayde) exploited the murder of Sarah Payne by a random psycho to create a hysteria and successfully lobby (in tandem with the NSPCC) for the sex offender’s register. Almost as soon as New Labour raised the minimum age for porn to 18 (of course, demanded by the usual suspects), it became taboo to date 17 year olds and considered “paedophilia”.
It literally took THREE YEARS to go from Chris Moyles asking to take 15 year old Charlotte Church’s virginity when she turned 16 and being voted “rear of the year” at 16 in 2002, to Chris Morris and the Brassseye Paedogeddon special in 2005.
You can’t blame “culture” on that.
And no, you wont get laid by a fan Eivind.
The Berge: “Before blaming women consider the control group of men and see if you can detect a difference. There is still a slight difference on surveys with men saying larger age gaps are acceptable but in practice you get so much hate from men too that I don’t consider the difference significant.”
Eivind insists that the greatest issue for our male sexualist movement, the biggest injustice in human history, is the penalization of women for having sex with teen boys.
That YouGOV poll a couple of years ago found that whilst over half-of-men found it acceptable for a 16 year old boy to have sex with a 30 year old woman, only 9% of women felt the same.
Meanwhile 4% of women think it is acceptable for a 40 year old man to date a 16 year old girl, whilst 17% of men did (or rather admitted – Eivind doesn’t comprehend that a man may not be so honest for obvious reasons of self-preservation).
If women are as much victims of anti-sex laws as men, and women are no more “anti” than men, why is that every single person in our movement is male, and the last time a woman commented positively on the Berge’s blog (or mine) was over a decade ago? Why is that news articles on women caught having sex with 13 year old boys is full of men making “lucky boy” comments, and never women (and NEVER, NEVER underneath an story on a man having sex with a 13 yo girl?).
” If women at the peak of their fertility see having children as a duty imposed by the government, well, then European civilization really deserves to be replaced by somebody more vigorous as is indeed happening”
OK, so because women are selfish cunts who wont have children, it means 2,000 years of Western Civilization (built entirely by men) “deserves” to be lost (rather than blaming or fixing women)?
The paedosperge is excited because a female paedophile has mysteriously popped up in his comments section. Naturally, the autistic imbecile is taking it as proof that STU theory is false.
The paedosberge talking to one of his teenage beauties in live video chat.
https://x.com/mrwtffacts/status/2053845150950994383
Though he probably can’t tell the difference anyway now his balls have shrunk to nothing after seven years of NoFap.
Eivind’s comments section has been a shit show lately.
Now he’s appealing to his followers to help him start a “sexual qualia research institute”.
“We need something like this for sexual qualia while he can take care of the rest. I have some disagreements with Emilsson about this because I think he is glossing over how GOOD sex feels. So his institute understates the case for our purposes, even though he correctly points out that the scale is exponential or logarithmic like for earthquakes, where something like ten times more energy is released for every step on the scale. He rates “hanging out with your girlfriend” as 5 out of 10 on the pleasure scale. Okay, if your girlfriend is 30, I can agree. But what if she is a nubile girl? According to my own qualia research on ephebo girls, they regularly reach 10/10 on the pleasure scale. And sure, even a normie would probably agree that a 16-year-old girl is a 10 and a 30-year-old is a 5, but they miss the immense importance of the difference because we usually gloss over the exponential quality of the scale. This is where rigorous research comes in to correct that, both for pleasure and pain. Yes, unfortunately the pain scale is logarithmic too, which means it is a matter of great urgency to prescribe DMT for cluster headaches.”
As if any of those literally retarded paedosberges even understand what the term “qualia” means.
And for a guy who points to porn as evil and an “addiction” because it feels so good, I’m not sure if trying to point out how good an orgasm feels is going to dismantle the STU abuse industry or their “arguments” about consent and abuse.
One of the paedosberge’s paedophile followers: “I was doing some reading up on red pill/purple pill online, and a term I often see come up is “hypergamous women”. I am very confused on why these men get angry at hypergamous women, but then when a woman is hypogamous(a female pedophile or a women who dates “bums” or “ugly men” or whatever) they still get upset? If you are a redpill man who hates hypergamy in women then you should LOVE female pedophiles, I mean, you cant bitch and whine about women only wanting to date rich older men who can protect and provide and take care of them, then bitch and whine when women want to date young boys with no money or skills or assessts who need to be taken care of and protected and provided for? Do they hate hypergamy in women or not? And if they hate it, then why arent they pro female pedophillia/cougars?”
Why doesn’t he do some research on the boys these female “paedophiles” are banging? 200 lb Chad and Tyrone high school football players invariably, not (probaby never) the shy weedy incel who the girls don’t look at.
The term “hypergamy” doesn’t just refer to women dating men more wealthy than them, it means women dating a higher “value” man. In any case, redpillers bitch about it because it leads to an impossible dating market for men with average women chasing the top 5%. What benefit is it to the average male or average redpiller if a percentage of women want to bang underage chads or chase black thugs?
Of course, Eivind agrees with his follower. Eivind was commenting on MRA blogs and claiming to be one for more than 20 years and still doesn’t understand MRM basics (such as the concept of the “back seat driver”), so it’s not suprising that basic red pill theory is beyond him.