Take the Green Pill

You have been lied to all your life. Everything you are told about sex and morality is filtered through the prism of the vaginas of women with fading or low sexual market value. These women represent feminism, which since its birth in the social purity movements of the late 19th Century, has always been a corrupt sexual trade union or “pussy cartel”. Feminism cares nothing for children, teen girls, and young women. Feminism’s only aim is to restrict sexual competition from younger or more easily available and attractive women. They do this by faking a concern to “stop sexual exploitation”. In fact, it is feminists victimizing younger women and girls, and exploiting men’s natural concern for their welfare and their willingness to protect them from other men, including through the use of violence.

Women are bringing Western civilization to its knees through their support for and often active facilitation of mass migration from the Third World. Feminists demonize men and blame them for “rape culture”, yet stay silent or actively support the mass migration of young, male sexual refugees from Islamic societies who will go on to commit real rapes and sexual assaults on native women and young girls in the thousands. Women vote for parties that support mass migration, in significantly greater numbers than men do. Female activists in female-dominated NGOs actively assist the trafficking of millions of illegal migrants into the West and never face any consequences. Yet, men are regularly arrested and imprisoned for supposed “sex trafficking’ in cases which can involve young women moving entirely voluntarily from one European country to another to seek work in the sex industry, or to attend a party or a modelling shoot after which they end up having sex with the host or the photographer. At the same time, female NGOs are notorious for dancing with and fucking the Third World low-IQ and often illiterate male migrants, sometimes underage, who are entirely dependent upon them to reach the West.

Female NGOs dance with migrants at a refugee camp.

The idea that teenage girls cannot consent to sex is entirely a feminist construct. It began with the overlapping social purity and suffragette movements in the 19th century as a way of effectively making sex before marriage illegal and controlling male sexuality. Suffragette campaigners such as Millicent Fawcett and Christabel Pankhurst were very public in arguing that the vote for women was about “improving” male sexual morality. For hundreds of years, the age of consent has been no higher than 10 in England and later the United Kingdom. It was a similar story in the USA and most other Christian countries. The magical and unquestionable present age of consent of 16 was set in stone by Christian feminists in the Victorian era who believed that sex before marriage was sinful, and at a time when girls did not start puberty until four or five years later than they do today. Nor was there a welfare state, safe and legal abortion, or the contraceptive pill.

For most of human history, sexual morality was largely determined by men. Sexual rules were needed for male cooperation to run smoothly and for societies to be built, to prosper, and to be defended, eventually turning into great civilizations. Just as sexual rules were made by men, they were upheld by men too. “Cheaters” would be punished, and just as with other forms of social rules and “morality”, men must have evolved a strong “cheater detection” instinct. In regard to “sexual rules” it is likely even more intense and visceral in men. Not only because sex is a primal need in men, and thus men “cheating” to get more than their fair share will elicit a primal response, but also because the breaking of sexual rules in past times would generally involve violence and potential harm or even death to a loved one such as a partner or a daughter.

However, for the last 150 years or so, sexual rules have largely been set by women, almost entirely so when they are supposedly about “protecting” women and young girls. Men simply accept these rules, just as they have accepted them for millennia when they were set by other men. Now, though, sexual rules are not set to smooth male co-operation, or even to genuinely protect women and girls who need it. Sexual rules set by feminists and women are about limiting sexual competition and inflating the price of pussy for feminists and the demographic of average-looking or older women that benefit from an artificially high price of sex. When it comes to the male cheater detection instinct for the breaking of sexual rules, the rules are written by women to the disadvantage of men, and yet the instinct is hard to shake off.

After the latest round of feminist anti-porn laws, it is now illegal in the UK to view a video of a woman consenting to be “choked” during sex. “Caught”, and you could go to prison for four years and spend a decade or more on the nonce register. Yet ‘Fifty Shades of Grey” that features hardcore BDSM scenes, is one of the most popular of books ever written for women. Just don’t call it porn – it’s “female erotica” (or even “romance fiction”). And women devour far worse than that in their millions. Amazon is full of trashy “erotic” novels featuring depraved tales of werewolves and other beasts practically raping the female characters. There are also werewolf penis shaped dildos and vibrators on Amazon if the female reader wants to take it a little further. Meanwhile, sex dolls for men have to be heavey and large breasted, and their faces a little jaded and sour, lest the buyer gets nicked for purchasing a “child sex doll”. Sex robots, which are finally around the corner, will almost certainly be banned, at least in the UK and probably Europe, before they go mainstream.