You have been lied to all your life. Everything you are told about sex and morality is filtered through the prism of the vaginas of women with fading or low sexual market value. These women represent feminism, which since its birth in the social purity movements of the late 19th Century, has always been a corrupt sexual trade union or “pussy cartel”. Feminism cares nothing for children, teen girls, and young women. Feminism’s only aim is to restrict sexual competition from younger or more easily available and attractive women. They do this by faking a concern to “stop sexual exploitation”. In fact, it is feminists victimizing younger women and girls, and exploiting men’s natural concern for their welfare and their willingness to protect them from other men, including through the use of violence.
Women are bringing Western civilization to its knees through their support for and often active facilitation of mass migration from the Third World. Feminists demonize men and blame them for “rape culture”, yet stay silent or actively support the mass migration of young, male sexual refugees from Islamic societies who will go on to commit real rapes and sexual assaults on native women and young girls in the thousands. Women vote for parties that support mass migration, in significantly greater numbers than men do. Female activists in female-dominated NGOs actively assist the trafficking of millions of illegal migrants into the West and never face any consequences. Yet, men are regularly arrested and imprisoned for supposed “sex trafficking’ in cases which can involve young women moving entirely voluntarily from one European country to another to seek work in the sex industry, or to attend a party or a modelling shoot after which they end up having sex with the host or the photographer. At the same time, female NGOs are notorious for dancing with and fucking the Third World low-IQ and often illiterate male migrants, sometimes underage, who are entirely dependent upon them to reach the West.
Female NGOs dance with migrants at a refugee camp.
The idea that teenage girls cannot consent to sex is entirely a feminist construct. It began with the overlapping social purity and suffragette movements in the 19th century as a way of effectively making sex before marriage illegal and controlling male sexuality. Suffragette campaigners such as Millicent Fawcett and Christabel Pankhurst were very public in arguing that the vote for women was about “improving” male sexual morality. For hundreds of years, the age of consent has been no higher than 10 in England and later the United Kingdom. It was a similar story in the USA and most other Christian countries. The magical and unquestionable present age of consent of 16 was set in stone by Christian feminists in the Victorian era who believed that sex before marriage was sinful, and at a time when girls did not start puberty until four or five years later than they do today. Nor was there a welfare state, safe and legal abortion, or the contraceptive pill.
For most of human history, sexual morality was largely determined by men. Sexual rules were needed for male cooperation to run smoothly and for societies to be built, to prosper, and to be defended, eventually turning into great civilizations. Just as sexual rules were made by men, they were upheld by men too. “Cheaters” would be punished, and just as with other forms of social rules and “morality”, men must have evolved a strong “cheater detection” instinct. In regard to “sexual rules” it is likely even more intense and visceral in men. Not only because sex is a primal need in men, and thus men “cheating” to get more than their fair share will elicit a primal response, but also because the breaking of sexual rules in past times would generally involve violence and potential harm or even death to a loved one such as a partner or a daughter.
However, for the last 150 years or so, sexual rules have largely been set by women, almost entirely so when they are supposedly about “protecting” women and young girls. Men simply accept these rules, just as they have accepted them for millennia when they were set by other men. Now, though, sexual rules are not set to smooth male co-operation, or even to genuinely protect women and girls who need it. Sexual rules set by feminists and women are about limiting sexual competition and inflating the price of pussy for feminists and the demographic of average-looking or older women that benefit from an artificially high price of sex. When it comes to the male cheater detection instinct for the breaking of sexual rules, the rules are written by women to the disadvantage of men, and yet the instinct is hard to shake off.
After the latest round of feminist anti-porn laws, it is now illegal in the UK to view a video of a woman consenting to be “choked” during sex. “Caught”, and you could go to prison for four years and spend a decade or more on the nonce register. Yet ‘Fifty Shades of Grey” that features hardcore BDSM scenes, is one of the most popular of books ever written for women. Just don’t call it porn – it’s “female erotica” (or even “romance fiction”). And women devour far worse than that in their millions. Amazon is full of trashy “erotic” novels featuring depraved tales of werewolves and other beasts practically raping the female characters. There are also werewolf penis shaped dildos and vibrators on Amazon if the female reader wants to take it a little further. Meanwhile, sex dolls for men have to be heavey and large breasted, and their faces a little jaded and sour, lest the buyer gets nicked for purchasing a “child sex doll”. Sex robots, which are finally around the corner, will almost certainly be banned, at least in the UK and probably Europe, before they go mainstream.
I wrote this article in a rush and it’s rather unfinished, but I thought that maybe you guys might offer some suggestions as to how I can add to it?
Perhaps make it clear that you think abortion is murder and that when you mentioned abortion, you were only putting it in the context of a number of other changes and not actually endorsing it.
The article is a major contribution to manosphere knowledge. One suggestion is that you tone-down or suppress the anti-immigration angle. It is a digression. Other people are pushing that agenda (including alas people with views antithetic to our ideas regarding woman and sexuality).
To be frank, for myself I I’m not convinced Muslim migrants rape women any more than non migrants do. It may be that like all of us men, they just find themselves surrounded by women who don’t fuck or only do so for money are resources. Alain Soral once explained how the tale of young Arabs having their way with local girls and gang-banging them in immigrant suburbs in France was a myth. Pushing the myth may be in our interest because it throws a bad light on feminism, but we don’t have to believe in it nor is it a good idea to let it divest attention from the main point, ie the Green Pill.
Thanks Jack.
Not sure, although probably I could move it down the list so it’s not so prominent.
I won’t argue the point greatly here, but I fail to see how millions of horny single young men who are escaping what they see as sexual restrictions in their own countries to fuck “easy” Pornhub sluts in the West (and then discover it’s not so easy) wouldn’t spike rape statistics.
My interest is primarily in why feminists demonize men (white men really) for being “rapists” and creating “rape culture”, bringing in law after law on the basis that it protects women and young girls from “rape” (even just watching a porn video with a teddy bear in it), and yet stay silent or support this mass influx of young men from the Third World. It’s the biggest smoking gun as to what feminism is. For sure, the “feminists have gone a little too far but are well-meaning” retard brigade can’t explain it.
As far as alienating people is concerned – muslims? I’ve been blogging here for 20 years (aside from the 3 year hiatus) and I can’t remember a single muslim commentator here (or for that matter, at Eivind’s blog, or any other blog that discusses these issues). Leftists? I think I’ve made clear now that this isn’t yet another leftist LGBt+PEDO blog. It’s a blog that grew out of the right-leaning men’s rights movement (unlike the paedosberge, I was and remain a genuine MRA) and recognizes that left-wing feminism is the root problem (at least in Europe).
Should we support mass immigration or at least not mention it because right-wingers often are against us? Well again, I don’t see many leftists supporting us either. I don’t want to sound like the paedosberge, but is there a significant difference? Maybe 99.99% of right-wingers hate us and 99.95% of leftists hate us? The occaisonal public figure who speaks out is just as likely to be right-wing as left-wing (example for every Michael Tracey there is a Richard Hanannia). BTW, by far the most violent pred hunting videos I’ve seen are from Afro-Americans.
I live in one of the safest countries in the world. You can walk at 3 am in any part of the city and feel completely safe. I don’t feel safe in London on any street, at any time of day. I quite like this. Even the anti-sex laws (all of them coming from pressure due to outside feminist NGOs) are fairly reasonable at this stage. Why would I want hundreds of thousands of single male migrants to come here, to directly compete with me for legal young women, to make every day closer to the jungle, having to walk past them and see them clenching their fists, spitting, knowing there’s a 99% probability they have a knife in their backpockets and a low-impulse frontal brain lobe that makes them only too ready to use it. Knowing that, yes, they will harass and in many case rape or assault local girls, leading to an inevitable populist backlash and the election of a far-right government that will probably bring in the death penalty for “rape” etc (exactly what is happening in Germany and every other Western country within the next 10 years). I’d have to be a retarded subhuman cuck to want that.
If you look at the incel forums, they’re pretty forthright on the migrant issue, even though a lot of the posters there are from ethnic minorities or live in Third World countries. Although it causes a bit of friction at times, it seems it only adds to the “revolutionary” incel culture.
I’d rather appeal to 10 incels than 100 left-leaning paedo rationalists, PUAs, MAPs etc. Incels are the only group (outside the pathetic MAPs themselves) who are questioning the narrative over sex laws (as they should), and not only that, but spreading memes into popular and mainstream culture (for example ‘Chad” etc, and it’s only a matter of time before “agecuck” does as well).
I would also say that the right, at least, is recognizing the role that women are playing in the downfall of the West, something the left is likely never going to do. It’s always been my position here that things won’t even begin to change until men wake up and see what women are doing.
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/2096678672740602148
And yes, importing millions of Muslim and Third World men will lead to Western civilization dying – whether you think that’s a good thing or not, and whether you think it’s great because men will be allowed to marry their 12 year old cousins, is beside the point.
Feminists: “Finding beautiful teen girls attractive is paedophilia!”
Nope. Take the Green Pill
Feminists: “Paying a 19 year old woman to cross a continent to give you a massage is sex trafficking!:
Nope. Take the Green Pill
Feminists: “Porn is violence against women!”
Nope. Take the Green Pill
Feminists: “Women who strangle their children to death need to be supported, not judged!”
Nope. Take the Green Pill
Feminists: “Young, male migrants from Third World countries are no more likely to rape than native white men!”
Nope. Take the Green Pill
I am and will always remain (unlike the paedosberge) an anti-feminist (the clue is in the name).
And remember old Schopenbecq’s Law – “If you ever find yourself agreeing with feminists, you have a duty to subject your view to critical self-analysis.”
No lies detected, most based internet post of 2026.
Perhaps can add a point about how men comment in droves on female teacher/male student prosecutions that the boy was lucky, while it is almost impossible to find women making similar comments that the girl was lucky in male teacher/female student prosecutions.
Thanks anon69! Yes, that’s a fundamental point I should include.
Yep, men don’t seem able to respond in ways that are in their own long-term interests. Another example would be the way women collectively act to raise age of consent laws and generally to make laws around sex harsher for straight men, but men never do the reverse. In Somalia they did, apparently, but AFAICS, Somalia is such a freakishly exceptional place that it’s not much of a precedent for anywhere else. This kind of action urgently needs to happen somewhere less bizarre, which would be almost anywhere.
More relevant hypocrisy-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oh8sDlUfoqc&t=2275s .
I don’t know that language, which I believe to be Danish, and I haven’t listened to a translation yet and probably won’t bother. However, I doubt she puts a good word in for men when it comes to the topic under discussion. Still more to the point, one can be absolutely certain that she hasn’t been subject to the same hysterical attacks a man would be for saying the same thing.
I honestly don’t know how any man cannot see pictures of white feminist NGO workers dancing with the black migrants they have trafficked in to have sex with and not feel a visceral rage. These same feminists would have you put in prison just for sexpatting in Asia, or paying for sex with an East European prostitute, and of course, tortured to death for having sex with a 15 year old (if they could).
Feminist MP who has backed calls for the “nordic model” for sex work in the UK “defends gender segregation at Muslim parade in her constituency”.
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16112113/Feminist-Labour-MP-defends-gender-segregation-Muslim-parade.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/i-m-a-sex-worker-and-i-don-t-enjoy-my-job-but-as-a-labour-party-member-i-m-glad-corbyn-is-listening-to-us-a6918876.html
“Feminists want to protect women and girls but have just gone a little too far due to American puritanism and Beysian economic incentive reinforcement cycles amplified by social media and angry moms and pops – dico ergo verum est “. (pedorationalist)
NO! It’s a corrupt sexual trade union. Wake up and take the green pill!
I love the poster/meme in the story, especially how it could easily be thrown back at them.
Instead of covered Muzzie womynz. it could be teenage girls or young 18+ women perhaps, with the same slogan-
“Before you decide you know what these women think, have the respect to talk to them in person.”
Maybe while the girls are talking to older men-there could be a few good counter memes in there.
A video went viral in Poland recently in which a Polish man sees an interracial couple arguing in the street and stops to check if the (white) woman is OK. The black male partner then reacts furiously and threatens the driver with a weapon.
The couple have both since been doxxed – the white woman is an anti-racist campaigner who supports African immigration to Poland.
https://x.com/BostonTea84/status/2097218591330361853
Now I’m not pointing this out because I’m against interracial sex or because I want the Polish “genetic purity” preserved.
I’m pointing out because I’d bet money that that same feminist NGO activist who is being slapped around and pounded by aggressive black cock and campaigns for more black cocks to be trafficked into Poland also thinks Epstien and his friends should all be executed, supports the Nordic model, wants the age of consent raised, would call you a pedo for texting a 17 year old etc etc.
We’re not paedosperges or Amos Soi here.
This is just part of waking men up. And yes, the “green pill” meme will make more sense to a more anti-woke manosphere community than the type of LGBT MAP trannies that the paedosberge is aiming for.
The constant increase of feminism, women’s empowerment, and “child protection” lies have caused the greatest misery for young people in history, and absolutely destroyed sexual activity, the bedrock of life affirmation. Here are the results so far, visualized: a drop from 80% to 40% of high school seniors going on a date in the span of only 25 years –
https://ifstudies.org/insights?id=3851
If this is AngloCunt nations, I don’t have any sympathy for them. Gernation Z are the most pathetic do as they are told in history. They are so utterly soulless. And their females are like the parody of prude aunties back in the fifties.
They are fucking losers. I’m going to keep calling Generation Z the huge losers that they are, publicly and often, so hopefully, Generation Alpha can take notice, as there’s still some hope for them to actually be cool.
A Jury of Her Peers: The Impact of the First Female Jurors on Criminal Convictions*
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/WR1100/WR1146/RAND_WR1146.pdf
“This paper uses an original data set of more than 3000 cases from 1918 to 1926 in the Central
Criminal Courts of London to study the effect of the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act of
1919. Implemented in 1921, this Act made females eligible to serve on English juries,
providing a novel setting for studying the impact of female representation on jury verdicts.
Results based on a pre-post research design imply that the inclusion of females had little
effect on overall conviction rates but resulted in a large and significant increase in convictions
for sex offenses and on the conviction rate differential between violent crime cases with
female versus male victims. The inclusion of women also increased the likelihood of juries
being discharged without reaching a verdict on all charges and the average time taken to reach
a verdict. A complementary analysis of cases in which the jury was carried over from a
previous trial also implies that the inclusion of female jurors on the seated jury sharply
increased conviction rates for violent crimes against women versus men. “
“Female athletes who condemn the sexualization of Sydney Sweeney’s body:
“It’s an affront to all women!”
The same female athletes on Instagram:”
https://x.com/EddySardou/status/2099815608313331993/photo/1
https://x.com/Cosmiccarebear/status/2099846153772667174
“This is transparent, and quite honestly, hilarious. Everyone knows this is modern female intrasexual competition. But, make no mistake, these athletes will end up with a huge number of suitors. Thousands of incoming DMs from guys saying, “I think you’re hotter than her…””
The average person can see that even good looking women calling other good looking women out for being “sexualized” is intrasexual competition.
A pedorationalist can see a hag sentencing himself to 20 years in prison for looking at a nude pic of a hot young girl, and it still won’t be “transparent”. He’ll think “Bruce Rind, cogito ergo sum aren’t I clever, cultural drift, angry moms and pops, social media amplification, men on Mars, well-meaning feminists gone a little too far etc etc.”
I’ve seen literally dozens of posts and comments on X today of a similar kind.
https://x.com/BowTiedYukon/status/2099882683019186459
Before I go to my grave, before AI kills us all, I need to the answer to this question:
“Why are MAPs so subhuman that they are the last men on Earth to understand female sexual jealousy, when they are by far the biggest and most obvious victims of it?”
I don’t think it can be explained purely by autism. Why, when we see hags raising the age of consent in the Victorian era, hags raising the age of consent in places like Spain, India etc today, hags making laws putting men in prison for even looking at a “sexual” pic of a beautiful fertile teen girl, hagmaxxers calling us paedos for admitting to liking hot teen girls etc, WE can see the obvious motive, and a paedosperge or MAP cannot?
I don’t think it can be explained purely by autism. After all, a lot of the incels have autism.
One reason is because the vast majority of the “MAPS” aren’t even attracted to teenage girls. They are into boys, or female toddlers, like the paedosperges.
BTW, the Telegraph feminist fat journalist behind the article has had to close her X account because she’s getting so much abuse calling out her sexual jealousy.
The corpulent Karen didn’t quite have the nerve to call Sydney Sweeney a “pick me”. That would have been a bit TOO obvious, so she settled for accusing her of not being “one of the girls.”
I guess the rise of Sydney Sweeney is part of the long-awaited backlash-may it continue and intensify.
Btw, all of these posters are “right-wing” anti-woke types. Good luck on the left ever calling out feminists for being fat, ugly, jealous pigs or hags. Richard Hannania may acknowledge intrasexual competition being partly to blame for Epstein hysteria, but Michael Tracey? Never.
OMG, I thought that was a photo of a young Meat Loaf there for a second.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2099940517760876574
Over 60K likes.
Also, I’m yet to find a comment under any of these posts of the like: “Yeah, but it’s a bit simplistic. There are other factors at play.”
Or.
“No, no, it’s cultural drift – the STU is a fantasy. Let me quote some Michael Foulcoult naked in the shower!”
Or.
“The problem isn’t female jealousy – it’s male jealousy! MEN ARE THE REAL PROBLEM!”
Or.
“It’s not ugly feminists shaming Sydney Sweeny, it’s angry moms and pops!!”
Or.
“Those feminists are not jealous – they are well meaning but they’ve just gone a bit too far!”
” Poppie Platt has deleted her X account [@poppieplatt] after a number of people accused her article on Sydney Sweeney of being driven by envy”
I wonder what any pedorationlists visiting this site think when they see the above? I know one or two of them still do, if only to downvote my comments on Eivind Berge, lol.
For 20 years I’ve been saying that the most “bang for your buck” we can ever have is to shame feminists and call out the transparently obvious (to any non-autistic retard) motivations of sexual jealousy and envy. For 20 years I’ve been saying it would only take 100 of us regularly shouting out this message to perhaps at least slow the drip drip of legislation, the growth of age gap hysteria and the ever more inflated definition of “paedophilia”.
But no.
It has to be 1000 word essays (maybe with a bit of AI help) on cultural drift or American puritanism, using some big words and the occasional Latin phrase to demonstrate how educated and, well, “rational” you are. And defintely no mention of feminists being sexually jealous, because that would be far too “simplistic”, “misogynistic”, and “vulgar”, and in any case, would alienate women and the “good feminists” who you fantasize would be happy to lower the age of consent to zero if only you show them enough Bruce Rind studies.
That “Basil the Great” post now has 1.9 million views and over 35K likes.
https://x.com/BasilTheGreat/status/2099935690402193456
Another article about Sydney Sweeney written by a jelly who I can’t wait to see taken down like Poppie Platt-https://www.dailymail.com/lifestyle/article-16136163/Sydney-Sweeney-advert-demeaning-women-money-CLARE-FOGES.html .
It’s good to see that plenty of comments were seeing through the bull.
Platt received quite a drubbing and perhaps Clare Foges, the author of this article, will too.
I went to the trouble of reading it. I hate to say she has a point about the ethics of endorsing a betting company.
However, what she was saying about the revealing shots themselves is just word salad on a base of jelly.
I bet those Aussie women who did that solidarity dance never expected to be criticized and satirized the way they have either.
A book is coming out next year devoted to explaining female intrasexual competition:
https://www.amazon.com/Mean-Psychology-Female-Rivalry-Break/dp/1668016060/
Unfortunately, the author appears to be a feminist, so it’s unlikely to discuss the STU with much depth or honesty.
“Mean also explores how patriarchal systems have forced women into a scarcity mindset, making them feel they must tear each other down to survive. You’ll find real-life examples that illustrate how these dynamics play out, ranging from the public shaming of women in the media to heartbreaking stories of teenage bullying and coworker betrayal.”
“She just graduated from college you creep!”
https://x.com/DukeHerndon/status/2102957006730481792
The whole post is full of great STU age gap hysteria meme replies.
I can’t remember why you guys don’t want to join X, but it would be helpful to take 2 minutes to sign up, given that X, for all it’s faults and for all the paedosberge whining because he gets banned for talking about sex with toddlers and having “proud MAP’ on his bio, it’s the best place (outside of incel forums) for an actual resistence movement to form.
It also would save me time having to screenshot and upload all the replies.
I love this one in particular: https://x.com/sewell_herb/status/2103040031468269944
That will go on the page for visual memes here when I set it up.
“Perhaps someday, we can all laugh at a woman looking at her saying something like that, because we all know why she says it.”
I believe that day will come, except that autistic MAPs and paedosperges still wont laugh because they don’t want to be “misogynistic” and anyway, the STU is a myth and it’s all down to cultural drift, social media amplification, angry moms and pops, and random sun spot cycles. They would literally be the last men on Earth to see it. It’s as if the Jews would be the last people on Earth to recognize that the Nazis were bad, or black Americans the last people to see that the Ku Klux Klan were bad, or if you like, Palestinians the last people on Earth to see that the Israelis are bad. That’s how autistic and clueless they are, exemplified by their “leader” Eivind sBerge.