The Problem With Eivind Berge

Before I took a multi-year sabbatical from posting on this blog, I was spending quite a bit of time criticizing fellow blogger Eivind Berge. This caused one of his psychotic Norwegian paedo-sadist Anders Brevik supporting readers to leave the most disgusting and depraved comments here every day – something that partly contributed to my decision to take a break. I will write more on my decision to come back to blogging, but what I don’t want to do is to again have to keep posting on the subject of Eivind Berge. So this article is intended to ‘get it all out’ in one go, and explain the reasons why he has angered me so much.

First of all, I should point out, or rather admit, that I do feel sometimes like I’m almost bullying him by constantly leaving critical comments at his site. This makes me uncomfortable, especially after the suicide of the PUA ‘Johnny Berba‘ recently, whose death affected me quite a bit, and who was subjected to some online ridicule over the years. In fact, one of the reasons I have come back to blogging is that it means I will no longer need to comment at Eivind’s blog. Again though, that’s not to say I want to be criticizing him all the time here either. Having said that, somebody who publicly calls himself a ‘proud paedophile’ clearly has a thick skin, to say the least, so I doubt if my criticisms of him are anything more than an irritation. And, as you will see below, I feel it is my right, or rather my obligation to criticize him, as he sets himself up as the self-annointed ‘leader’ of our non-existant movement. He claims to speak for me, and other long-time activists such as ‘Jack’.

So let’s get to the heart of the matter. There are few people out of the billions on this planet who are speaking out against insane feminist anti-sex laws. I am one of those people. Eivind is one of these people too. And yet, he often forces me to almost hate him. How can this be? Well, this is why.

He literally calls himself ‘leader’ of our ‘movement’. Before that, he believed he had a special power to annoint others as ‘leader’.

There is no ‘movement’, and there is no ‘leader’. A handful of people commenting on his blog (often disagreeing with him) does not make a movement. His principle justification for calling himself a leader appears to be that he is ‘public’, which he is very proud of (and more of that later). Before he decided to annoint himself as the chosen one, he did the same for a potential false flag (or simply clumsy individual) named Tom Grauer (who was more than happy to accept). Our ‘movement’, which appears to consist of a few individuals, seems to attract very egotistical people. I cannot recall the Men’s Rights Movement, which has or did have tens of thousands of followers, ever choosing a ‘leader’. Paul Elam, who was certainly egotistical, may have acted like a leader, but he never called himself one, and I can’t recall more than a handful of MRAs ever claiming that he was. Similarly, the incels have never had a ‘leader’ (although Elliott Rodger may be a kind of ‘saint’ to many of them). For that matter, the gay rights movement, the trans rights movement has never had a ‘leader’. Even the MAPs do not have a ‘leader’.

Eivind’s need to call himself a ‘leader’ appears not just to be ego driven in the sense that he needs validation from ‘followers’, but is perhaps an even more insidiuous and treacherous attempt to get laid with a ‘female fan’ (more below).

Constantly Boasts Of Being ‘Public’, Whilst Chiding Everybody Else For ‘Cowardice’

One of the reasons, or THE reason Eivind thinks he is entitled to call himself a ‘leader’, despite having only one or two readers who see him as such, is because he is public with his activism. He is very proud of this, and constantly chides others for being anonymous. Ironically, the only thing his one, two, or three(?) ‘followers’ have in common is that they refuse to even adopt unique identifying usernames when commenting on his blog. He may only have one ‘follower’ – it’s really impossible to know. But it sure is cringey – like most things about him.

What’s most grating about this proud boast of Eivind is that he seems oblivous to the fact that Norway is one of the few countries, or is perhaps the only country in the world, where ‘public activism’ in this regard is not suicidal. He also appears oblivious to the dangers that such public activism present to himself even in Norway. He was genuinely surprised (and even wrote a blog post on it) to discover that the rare Tinder matches with chubbies he was getting would invariably ghost him after Googling his name and discovering that he was a ‘proud paedophile’ who believed that ‘rape is equality’. He makes videos that potentially give away his location. This mirrors the (real) paedophile activist ‘Amos Yee’, who was similarly public and then surprised when he got beaten up in a shopping center.

It’s also not clear what benefit being public has brought himself or to any cause of male sexual rights. He claims that it has brought him media exposure. His first real episode of national (and even international) exposure was when he was arrested for threatening to stab police officers on his blog. Note that although he used his real name on his little known blog, his identity would obviously have been revealed had he chosen to blog anonymously, through his arrest and subsequent trial. On the back of this media attention, and many years later, he was invited to take part in a Norwegian documentary on Incels and other ‘angry young online men’. As Eivind was no longer young, and not even so angry, the documentary makers clearly had him on to reassure the public that these angry young men will eventually just turn into harmless middle-aged eccentrics like Eivind. It was clearly a ‘comic light relief’ interval segment. Eivind, dressed in a cardigan on a hot summer’s day, hardly mentioned male sexuality, but was invited to showcase his absurd ‘Fertile Dating’ attempt at a co-parenting matchmaking site, and present it to a panel of business experts (who spent the entire time trying to surpress their laughter).

His next enounter with ‘fame’ remains his proudest moment. After watching his performance on the Incel documentary, a feminist filmmaker read his blog and decided he would make the perfect subject of a black comedy. So she got in touch with Eivind and they met several times to discuss the project – meetings which Eivind proudly refers to as ‘dates’. The film was made, and portrayed Eivind as a mentally ill loner with erectile dysfunction problems, and who finally finds sexual happiness in a sex doll brothel. Nevertheless, Eivind was extremely proud of it, especially when ‘his film’ won a prize at the Cannes Film Festival, with the panel of judges explicitly stating that they giggled throughout the screening. Eivind put down his ‘success’ to his genius move of making YouTube videos naked in his shower whilst praising a man who was jailed for abducting a 12 year old girl.

In tangible benefits, it has maybe brought him 2 or 3 Norwegian readers to his blog, although he/they sometimes claim that they followed him since his original arrest. According to the SEO analysis tool SemRush, his blog has around 5 visitors a day. His YouTube channel, despite being in his real name, has 140 or so subscribers, and his videos only get 2 or 3 likes each.

So it’s not clear at all why there is a benefit to being public. No doubt if he didn’t come across as an autistic weirdo, then he might have a case. Somebody with the looks and charisma of Andrew Tate clearly benefits from being ‘public’. Somebody like Matt Forney, who was far more successful when blogging anonymously as ‘Ferdinand Bardemu (InMalaFide), doesn’t. Eivind certainly doesn’t.

Finally, and most seriously, it appears that being public may have affected his integrity, to say the least. Just as with his ‘coparenting’ site Fertile Dating, he openly admits he wants to get laid through ‘his movement’, the name of which he has single-handedly changed from ‘Male Sexualism’ to just ‘Sexualism’ in order to attract a horny female fan. Despite having low or non-existing standards when it comes to choosing a partner, his only girlfriend in the last 20 years was a female fan called Emma who followed his blog and hooked up with him as a result. He is clearly hoping that lightening will strike twice. Back then, at least he was an angry young man. Emma was an attractive young woman of Slavic origin who would normally be out of Eivind’s league, but who apparently had a fetish for omega males. He claims that he dumped her a few years ago because she didn’t want to have children, probably expecting a new fan would replace her soon enough. It didn’t happen. That hasn’t prevented Eivind from changing the name of the movement, or from refusing to accept that women in general have any responsibility for the present war on male sexuality, in order to make himself attractive to any potential ‘second Emma’.

Accepts The Feminist Paedophile Slander And Is Tactically Clueless

When it comes to tactics, Eivind is like a blind man leading an army into battle. This is a man who is surprised that being public with activism such as claiming that ‘rape is equality’ leads to fewer dating oportunities with the opposite sex. This is a man who thinks that a coparenting website with a HTML school project design and competing with an established site that has 100K+ members, whilst publicly declaring himself a ‘proud paedophile’ and defending the right of a father to sodamize his son, whilst openly stating he himself is looking to get women pregnant through his own site, might actually become the next million dollar tech startup, with investors flooding in. This is a man who thinks that making YouTube videos naked in the shower will get him listened to by ‘serious people’. This is a man who thinks AI is overhyped, who started learning code AFTER ChatGPT in his forties, and who waits earnestly for ‘peak oil’ and the collapse of Industrial Civilization. This is a man who used to mine Bitcoin when it was worth peanuts, and then came to the conclusion it was ‘overhyped’, and sold it all for peanuts, amounts that would have made him a billionaire, and who still thinks he made the right decision. So it’s hardly a surprise that when it comes to formulating tactics for our ‘movement’, the man is a literal imbecile.

Eivind has alienated just about every demographic that we are likely to have any hope of winning to our cause in order to form a base of a real movement. He’s pissed off virtually every MRA with his cringey white knighting obsession with the ‘female sex offender charade’. That is, almost every other article he’s published in the last decade on his blog has been concerned with the latest female teacher to be denied the pussy pass for sucking off 13 year old Tyrone’s BBC in class. He’s pissed off every potential Incel recruit by calling them ‘losers’ (whilst describing himself as an ‘alpha male Chad!’), despite any imbecile seeing that the Incel movement is the obvious place where an anti-feminist male sexual consciousness is emerging. He’s pissed off every one of the millions of potential porn lover recruits by calling them ‘wankers’ over and over again, despite any imbecile realizing that with advances in porn tech, feminists will be ‘forced’ to criminalize ever increasing millions of men.

I can’t recall Eivind making a single practical and useful tactical suggestion in the near 20 years he has been blogging. His only ‘goal’ for the ‘movement’ is to see the collapse of Industrial Civilization, something he believes will follow inevitabily from ‘peak oil’, and which will ‘spite feminists’. Although he mentions feminists a lot and claims to see that they are in some way responsible for sex laws, he refuses to accept any form of ‘Sexual Trade Uninon theory’, ‘green pill’, or ‘pussy cartel’ theories (all much the same), and instead refers to ‘cultural drift’ as an explanation. This may be because he’s genuinely an imbecile, but it’s more likely, as mentioned above, that he simply doesn’t want to blame women lest it reduces his chances of getting laid with a female fan. In any case, any tactical suggestion he has put forward, such as..ahem…’fighting the police’, ‘registering voluntarilly as sex offenders’, ‘breaking sex laws’ etc. would only even make sense if we had at least hundreds of thousands of followers, rather than a handful.

But the most seriously inept and tactical crime of Eivind Berge is his submissive acceptance of the feminist paedophile slander. He now refers to himself as a ‘proud paedophile’. Not even identifying himself as an aspie ‘MAP’ is enough for him. He is a proud paedo. He justifies this on the basis that ‘words mean whatever people say they mean’. Here, he simply demonstrates his place on the spectrum again. Words have numerous shades of meaning, differences in context, differences in the speaker’s intention and even ‘motive’. The word paedophile might be used these days even to describe a man with a 19 year old girlfriend, but it is a case of the original and true meaning of the word – a pervert with a preference for little kids – being exploited by feminists in order to shame normal male sexuality. Eivind can’t see this. It’s as though Martin Luthar King accepted that he was a ‘proud nigger’, or even a ‘proud slave’, because white racists called him it.