34 year old Amber Laudermilk, a licensed female embalmer from Texas, faces charges after officials said she cut off a dead man’s penis with a scalpel and stuffed it in his mouth, after discovering he was a sex offender. The embalmer then told a trainee who had witnessed the act – “you haven’t seen anything”. The 58 year old man – Charles Roy Rodrigquez – had been required to register as a sex offender after an incident with a woman at a bar, although the fact that he had been given ‘deferred adjudication’ suggests it was relatively trivial. Rodrigquez had died of natural causes.
The incident investigated by Constable Rosen’s Office happened at Memorial Mortuary and Crematory on Pine Street, according to records, after the funeral director in charge had a conversation on the phone with the family of Charles Roy Rodriguez, 58.
According to investigators, Rodriguez had been charged with sexual assault and given deferred adjudication related to an incident involving a woman at a bar. He was also required to register as a sex offender.
They discussed splitting Rodriguez’s remains between the new spouse and his daughter from a previous marriage, according to records, and the family member mentioned that he was a registered sex offender.
I discovered this news item on a Facebook post shared by a US news channel. Checking the comments underneath the link, I counted that 18 of the first 20 comments were from women gloating over the deed, one was a man who articulately expressed his disapproval, and the other was another man expressing his agreement. One particular comment – from a monstrosity by the name of Vanessa Forbes – stands out for its mocking cruelty: “Reminds me of a recent interview of Lorena Bobbitt. She was tickled when talking about picturing someone having to pick up her husband’s penis from the grass on the side of the road. Makes me giggle too.”
These are the people MAPs think will come to their side, and cucked individuals like Eivind Berge white knight for when they occasionally fall foul of their own sex offender laws and have their pussy pass revoked.
Females are truly stupid and emotionally insane. They will continue to destroy society until put in place by men who aren’t cucks, aka foreigners who are replacing whites.
Well said, and good to see you here anon69.
Is it just me, but am I the only one who rolls my eyes at everytime an article mentions this?
“I don’t know the suspect’s past, but we have the utmost empathy for anyone who has been the victim of a sexual assault or is the family or friend of someone who has been the victim of a sexual assault,” Rosen said. “The facts clearly indicate she was angry, and I hope after this is resolved in the courts, she gets the help she needs.”
Why is there all of this forced sympathy for “sexual assault” victims? Like, the incident happened at a bar. The man probably grabbed her buttocks or something. Why do we need to feel bad for what happened to the woman nearly 25 years ago. She wasn’t harmed or attacked. Why do we “sexual assault” on such a high, negative pedestal. Women need to get over it and stop using the “victim” label as their entire personality. Just because someone is a victim in the eyes of a law, doesn’t mean they literally are one or they have to be one. The only real victim here is the sex offender who had to carry the scarlet letter until the day he died.
One thing I will tell you though…
I’m very skeptical about this whole “rape” trauma that many women claim to experience. If there was no extreme violence, injury, risk of death, involved, then she should get over it. “Rape” can basically mean anything now, even if it’s just interpreting “no” as “yes”.
Eivind doesn’t believe in sociogenic or iatrogenic harm, but I feel like a lot this “trauma” stems from the idea that women are expected to be traumatized and “ruined” by rape, and then use it empower themselves and activism. You also got therapists and courts pushing the victim label too, so that can be self-fulling as well.
Women want to be “raped” or banged regardless of their resistance. It heightens the experience for them, in fact. Most “raped” women report having intense orgasms. This is a major motivator for women screaming about “rape”, the more they think they are a victim, the more they get off on it. A woman who thinks a man will rape her is literally the same thing as a man looking at a nice pair of tits. Women screaming about rape is a shit test.
There’s a reason 50 Shades of Grey is the #1 best selling book of all time. It’s female porn, and female porn use is clearly greater or equal to men’s porn use when analyzed properly in this context. And for more daring women, they disproportionately seek out rape porn on the internet compared to men by far. “Psychologists” are paid by feminists to come up with all sorts of fake diagnoses for women who are turned on by “rape” when literally every woman is turned on by “rape.”
Weak men walk around like this isn’t the case. There should be 50,000 commenters here supporting this view, regardless of the feminist law and media oppression. But instead the vast majority are weak and stupid, so women will continue seeking out Muslims to replace weak, stupid white men who listen to women’s bullshit, and also use feminism to undercut each other (pedocrites).
I remember the late and great Barbara Hewson often said that the word ‘survivors’ should be reseved for those who have survived a life-threatening event or illness, such as plane crash survivors or cancer patients. Now the word is applied to OnlyFans whores who get deepfaked. There isn’t a female cancer patient with a terminal diagnosis in the world who wouldn’t jump at the chance to be ‘groped’ or worse if it meant that they would survive their cancer.
Of course violent sexual assault can be traumatic, but feminists insist there is no difference between a client having sex with a prostitute and not paying her, or a husband ‘forcing’ himself on his wife who would rather have an early night, and a woman being dragged in bushes at knifepoint by a stranger. It’s all equally ‘rape’, and therefore equally traumatic. Which is just admitting that it’s the label and not the act itself that does most of the damage, and it all makes sense when you realize that the labels of ‘rape’, ‘abuse’, and ‘exploitation’ are simply applied on anything these days that lowers the ‘price’ of sex.
Do you ever notice how many TV use rape and sexual assault for shock value? Do you also notice how easy it is to make a villain a rapist, so the audience can thirst for his comeuppance? Think of how many movies use “rape” to make a character suddenly dislikable? Seriously, who’s writing this stuff? Why, as a society, do we se sexual violence as the worst form or violence, even though are things much, much worse than that out there? Why is rape, suddenly the magnum opus of a woman’s trauma? Is it because it involves sex? Does society hate wrong “sex” that much? We don’t flinch when there’s physical violence, murder and death on screen. But nudity and sex? Cover your eyes, honey!