In 1999 Sweden became one of the first countries to criminalize payment for sex, and their ‘Kvinnofrid law’ was soon copied by a number of other feminist states, even becoming known as the ‘Nordic model’. Now they are attempting to lead the way in enlarging the scope of that legislation into a new law to cover online sexual services. If it comes into force, the law would criminalize any Swede who pays for a porn site membership, or tips a webcam girl. Even paying for an OnlyFans subscription would be illegal. This isn’t just a scaremongering worst case scenario of the law being interpreted in a particularly extreme and unlikely way. Tube sites, webcam services, and OnlyFans have been specificially mentioned in the drafting of the law as examples of what it would cover.
The original ‘Nordic model’ laws against the paying for sex were ostenisbly justified over concerns that many sex workers were being trafficked into the West against their will, from countries in Eastern Europe and the Third World. The fact that even OnlyFans creators are being targetted by the new law leads one to suspect that the motive may have been something else all along. Long-time readers of this blog will know what that motive patently is and always was.
In most countries that have implemented the ‘Nordic model’, it is illegal to pay for sex even when abroad. I personally know of a Norwegian incel who is too terified to even take a budget flight to bang a cheap whore in Eastern Europe for fear that he could be arrested. Meanwhile, Scandinavian women make up a large percentage of the hundreds of thousands of female sex tourists who travel to Jamaica alone in order to have sex with local poverty-stricken male prostitutes. Men who they refer to (non-objectifyingly at all) as ‘big bamboo’. Indeed, Swedish women are confident enough to openly boast about their sex tourism exploits, and the power they have over the local men.
29 year old Veronica had a 23 year old lover from Ecuador called Emilio, although she hadn’t intended to have a so-called “gringuero” when she went travelling.
“It just happened, and when I got there I found it was almost strange if you didn’t have a younger lover”, said Veronika.
Women that have “gringueros” are mainly from America, Switzerland, Germany, England, Norway, Finland and Sweden – and it’s not cheap. 27 year old Anna told Expressen that she paid 7000 crowns to keep her lover, Javier, who she met in a small village in Peru.
He promised to keep her company during her travels in South America, on condition that she paid his way.
“Javier told me he could be anything I wanted him to be because I was his Queen”, said Anna to Expressen.
Most of the women admitted they were aware of the “power” they had over their lovers. But they also believe there is nothing wrong with the whole experience.
“These guys are just ordinary beach flirts who looking for sex – but who are bought and offered more stuff than an average bloke”, said Anna. She doesn’t believe it can be compared to men who buy sex from women, she said.
No female sex offender charade going on there then, only the usual sickening double standards.
Sweden was the country that invented sex films if I’m not mistaken. One generation of women enjoyed the sexual revolution. After they hit the wall those same women shut the trap-door behind them, denying the next generation the freedom they themselves had enjoyed.
“I decided to become a porn model in order to experiment” says the woman “but now that I am old I realize I was a victim, so I want to protect my daughter from suffering the same fate”.
@Jack – Yep, there can’t be many countries that have gone from such extremes as hyperliberal sexual freedom to feminist puritanical control as Sweden. The Netherlands is pretty similar. And you summed it up perfectly, as usual.
Women are such incredibly myopic, selfish individuals with no concept of honor, integrity, morality or logic; they need to get these cues from men, and in a cucked feminist society, weak men provide no guidance and only play along to save themselves. If you have weak men, you have out of control women who are only too happy to punish weak men. In a way, it is natural and makes sense. It’s too bad the strong men are too few and too censored to make a difference, however, we don’t have to suffer the consequences as long as we have freedom of mobility. If we don’t make use of that freedom, you can make the argument we deserve what we get because we chose to living among the weak men, and in the end, does that make us really strong after all? Just like Eivind needs to get on a flight and bang Eastern Europeans for cheap, we must vote with our money and our presence as well in better locales.
anon69
Absolutely, vote with our feet and with our money.
I also think it would do Eivind good to travel for sex, maybe not to Easter nEurope but to some other even better place where he can bang bareback for real cheap (Madagascar, Jakarta …). I also surmise should Eivind do that, he would get rid of his obsession with NoFap and NoPorn. But I think Eivind already told us he would travel for sex if he had the money. By the way, is Norway not one of those countries that criminalize sex travel for its own citizens?
Yes, Norway was one of the first to criminalize paying for sex abroad for its citizens. I did read the other day that nobody has ever been charged under the law though. Having said that, Eivind is obviously being ‘watched’, and maybe the pigs would love to have a reason to arrest him again.