Australian Man Fined $340K for Posting Deepfake Porn
This is a little interesting because the man was pretty defiant about it. Firstly, telling the authorities that the (Australian) law didn’t apply to him because he wasn’t a resident, and then emailing the deepfake porn images to 50 addresses including “the eSafety Commissioner and media outlets”. He appears to have posted only images of one “prominant Australian woman”, and was charged in 2023, before Australia made even the creation of deepfake porn punishable by jail.
“A man who posted deepfake pornographic images of prominent Australian women has been slapped with a hefty fine as a “strong message” in a first-of-its-kind case.
The federal court ordered Anthony Rotondo, also known as Antonio, to pay a $343,500 penalty plus costs on Friday after the online regulator eSafety Commissioner brought a case against him almost two years ago.
Rotondo admitted to posting the images on a website called MrDeepFakes.com, which has since been shut down.”
Michigan Bill Aims to Block Adult Content and VPNs
Just when you thought that American conservatives couldn’t get any more batshit insane.
“If you live in Michigan, you might not be able to legally use a VPN soon if a new bill is passed into law. On Sept. 11, Michigan Republican representatives proposed far-reaching legislation banning adult internet content.
The bill, called the Anticorruption of Public Morals Act and advanced by six Republican representatives, would ban a wide variety of adult content online, ranging from ASMR and adult manga to AI content and any depiction of transgender people. It also seeks to ban all use of VPNs, foreign or US-produced. “
https://x.com/JoshuaSchriver/status/1966522965249454494
Gérard Depardieu to face trial over rape and sexual assault allegations
“French actor Gérard Depardieu has been ordered to stand trial over allegations of rape and sexual assault in 2018.
His accuser, actor Charlotte Arnould, said she was relieved the case was going to court, seven years after she filed a complaint.
Depardieu, 76, has denied the charges, insisting his relationship with Arnould was consensual.
He was convicted in May of sexually assaulting two members of a film production crew four years ago – and placed on a list of sex offenders, but not jailed. He had denied their allegations.”
Imagine having to suffer that hanging over you for seven years. And now a lengthy trial and a possible prison sentence – for a 76 year old man.
Creepy Old Guy Goes Viral
A lonely man who approached a young woman in a store who turned out to be 17, has gone viral for all the wrong reasons after the helpless little princess decided to record him for TikTok views. YouTuber man child ‘Penguinz’ with 17 million followers has devoted a video to not only shaming him, but likening him to infamous serial killer Ted Bundy. You are now on the same level as a serial killer for continuing to chat to a 17 year old girl after she has told you her age (the man awkwardly says – “that’s a good age” in reply – which according to most of Penguinz’s viewers, warrants locking the man up).
Ok, I’m trying my best this time not to hate fake male feminist white knight “Penguinz” who would (or maybe still is) surely be a loser who would never have a shot at banging an attractive, young amateur, if not for his popular Youtube channel. It really says something that even when these low status males achieve popularity, they still feel so insecure that they need to shit on other men to feel better about their own prospects with amateurs. USA males are terminally infected with the feminine spirit, and I will give them the benefit of the doubt since they have been brainwashed from birth with brutal feminism.
The video itself (and comments) just tells us three things: 1) the rule of “be attractive, don’t be unattractive” is even more relevant in the age of social media feminism 2) immaturity is off the charts in the Anglosphere, so the initial approach must be indirect with a fair amount of banter before dropping any compliment 3) it’s better to leave the Anglosphere altogether to step down the amount of immature feminist insanity (I am also interested in an article on Geomaxxing as I believe we could all add something good to it from experience).
Damn, we’re out here trying to hack it as normal men in a male-hostile world, getting banned, shamed, and abused by women young and old for nothing, while trannies continue to tear it up!
https://reduxx.info/exclusive-convicted-child-molester-competed-in-womens-tennis-matches-against-teen-girls-after-concealing-his-identity-by-transitioning/
This guy is going around walking in to hot young pussy with a welcome mat because he says he’s a woman (and obviously, feminists are losing their minds over it). He’s also treated well in the places he goes, according to his now deleted Reddit post history, even openly flirting with 10 year old girls in front of their approving parents while getting a sandwich in Subway.
What are we doing holding on to our dignity? lol.
I think there is a huge backlash coming for trannies. They are definitely overplaying their hand with stuff like this, besides the now regular school shootings.
Maybe when society is allowed to hate actual real perversion and sexual mental illness again, it might take the heat off normal male sexuality a little.
I believe the most popular ‘MAP’ explanation for their persecution (paedohysteria) is that society can no longer hate gays, so their hate is directed at them. It probably has some truth to it.
Yeah, the backlash against trannies might not be a bad thing for straight males. I hold no grudge against trannies as they have pushed back a little against feminism, but at the end of the day they’re males who betrayed maleness in favour of temporary opportunism. Anything – including “transitioning” – but fight back as men.
Perfectly put Jack.
Nestle boss fired for having a relationship with a colleague: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1mpm9ee9p9o
Just to repeat what I said recently regarding the source of the age gap taboo coming from feminism. All this ‘power difference negates consent’ bullshit came from feminism. It didn’t come from boozed up men in pubs, nor even MAGA followers on Twitter. It comes squarely from feminist theory (or rather, decades long STU echo chamber self-rationalization).
22-year-olds are now children….
https://incels.is/threads/22-child-now.785457/
Some news from the UK:
https://incels.is/threads/pedo-chad-jailed.785317/
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clydeen7zn9o
The good news is that at least some people notice the ever increasing insanity.
theantifeminist says: “the only hope is in the incels”, and the incels 3 seconds later..:
https://incels.is/threads/the-age-of-consent-should-be-as-high-as-possible-21-even.708004/
https://incels.is/threads/why-i-am-an-agecuck.729189/
Lol. the only hope is these guys? A bunch of sexually frustrated guys who can’t have sex even with women their age and therefore want to prevent other men from having it with older teens? They remind me of some sexually frustrated pest people who call themselves feminists.
Incel age cucks are the most disgusting and treacherous creatures on Earth. However, anyone who doesn’t think there are Feds active in incel forums trying to push back against the age cuck meme (which the Department of Homeland Security basically admitted was one of the most dangerous ideas in the Manosphere) is…quite naive.
Having looked at many of these topics from the last couple of years, the majority I would say is definitely anti-age-cucked. And I provied many examples over the last weeks.
Since this site is not called “AgainstAgeCucks.Is”, you will obviously have oppossing views, for whatever reason, trolling, FEDs, or their true opinion on this matter.
And I have yet to find many other sites that let you be this frank about this topic. So once again, we can’t be too picky just because 1 or 2 out 10 turn out to be an age cuck.
Yes Steve, good luck in finding any place online where you wont get age cucks and paedocrites. Incel forums show signs of a true ‘awakening’ from all the bullshit that has brainwashed society on this topic. That’s why I say there is hope with incels. And of course, there are genuine age cucks among them, but no doubt Feds too trying to neuter incel culture (I think the incels themselves refer to them as ‘glowies’).
Irish comedian Graham Linehan arrested by armed police when arriving at a UK airport, because he tweeted that he hated trannies.
The UK is turning into an absolute dystopian hellhole.
https://deadline.com/2025/09/graham-linehan-arrested-heathrow-after-x-posts-1236503915/
BTW, I don’t know if you guys ever watched Linehan’s sitcom ‘Father Ted’ back in the 2000s. It was about a group of priests on a remote Irish island. One of them was a drunk who spent most of his time asleep dreaming about schoolgirls.
They would never allow this today:
https://youtu.be/klrS-1zznR0?si=Mq3ADeZBUCo2G4Uh&t=400
Hilarious, and a sad indication of how times have changed at the same time. Nowadays, even “alternative” thinkers like Sanity4Sweden are literally afraid to admit their natural attraction to 16 yo girls. He put out a video a few months back about a dream he had in which a 16 yo girl appeared to him and he stressed that there was no sexual aspect to it. It reminds me of that song “The Dream Police”, or perhaps “The Wet Dream Police”. Perhaps he indeed didn’t regard the girl sexually, but it’s absolutely pathetic that he has to declare it. What would have happened if there WAS sexual content? An NPC meltdown, perhaps?
And this loser lives in a country where the minimum age isn’t even 16, but 15.
I still listen to him for other reasons but God give me strength!
What a bleeping paedocrite!!!
It is laughable how virtually all of these alternative thinkers and self-styled ‘heretics’ can’t even begin to question (teen) paedohysteria, and yet our current attitudes would be considered crazy for nearly all of human history, as recently as 30 years ago or less.
I often dream about teen girls, more often than not non-sexual but romantic – I meet a teen cutie and go on a date and such. Sometimes I think I’ve accepted I’m too old that it will never happen again in real life and I don’t particularly care anymore, but when I wake up from such a dream I realize how much it still matters to me and how great it would be. I do wonder though if I’ll still be having these dreams when I’m 70 or 80 (if I get that far).
“I often dream about teen girls, more often than not non-sexual but romantic”.
Ain’t nothin’ wrong with the romantic/ emotional angle.
But wait, there is-muh power imbalance makes you a monster!
If a man actually does rape an underage girl, there are normal rape laws to deal with that. Funny how actual rape can be dealt with no matter what the age of the victim. Who knew?To me, this alone shows that the age of consent is a crock.
Statutory rape is indeed all about power-female and feminist power.
I wish I could have more sexy dreams like Anon69 can. I would say that that is the only real benefit of doing NoFap for a week or so.
But the ‘romantic’ dreams do remind me that I’m still emotionally drawn to teen girls and young women.
Sadly, this is how they tend to see me these days: https://x.com/nab1803/status/1962998815822381462/photo/1
And yes, you are absolutely right with the observation on statutory rape. I’ve always thought that it is well-named. It really is the (feminist) state raping the teen girl through her forced classification as an ‘abuse victim’, as well as the man and his processing and imprisonment as a ‘sex offender’- simply for the sexual market value benefit of the hags who made and support the law.
https://incels.is/threads/ugly-old-man-with-young-asian.785733/
Look at this. Now, do I really think she is “deeply in love” or highly physically attracted to the old man in this case? No. And it doesn’t always have to be. If both parties know exactly why they are with each other, then its fine by me.
But I like this public presentation for other reasons, and that’s the real reason why I am posting it here. It shows all these age cucks the middle finger. It shows that even old, not in shape, ugly man want young pussy (example #2020394292), and he is displaying nonchalantly. Takes balls at his advanced age and looks.
Anything that makes age cucks seethe is welcome from my POV.
There are many little baby boys who know nothing about women and are indoctrinated by feminism into thinking men and women are the same, thus the gold digger meme. A wife gives her husband $10,000 and he says “cool” but he doesn’t get hard. A man gives his wife $10,000, and her pussy literally gets wet. Money signals dominance, like charisma, confidence, bravery, good looks, prison tats, violence, etc. Dominance to a woman is like a pair of perfect tits to a man.
Re: https://reduxx.info/exclusive-convicted-child-, molester-competed-in-womens-tennis-matches-against-teen-girls-after-concealing-his-identity-by-transitioning/ , I can’t help admiring the sheer nerve of the guy.
Many years ago-back in the early 90’s I believe-there were reports in Aussie media of Gerard Depardieu telling the press that he committed a number of rapes back when he was around nine years old. I’m not making that up. Times have changed of course, but I’m still amazed that there was no outcry. The reporting was completely matter-of-fact . It might or might not have been true, but it goes to show how people can largely just be led around by the nose, being outraged-or not-according to the mood of the times.
Another good video from CityCrusher, this time on Japanese women and feminism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGqkdVM_VpE
I don’t want to bang on with the “which gender is to blame” constantly, but just look at Japan and how it’s changed in the last 20 years. It was a male sexual paradise 20 years ago, about as good as it possibly could get – at least if you were financially sound and not hideously ugly (and even then you could console yourself watching the amazing porn, and not to mention stuff like ‘schoolgirl panty vending machines’, lol).
Whose to blame for why Japan has turned in the last 20 years? They were freaking well occupied by the USA for years or decades and it still didn’t stop them (aside from the crappy pixelation of sexual organs rule in porn). You can’t blame this one on men or MAGA fuckwits. It’s feminism and Japanese women. Maybe Japanese men can be blamed for being pussies and not fighting back, but FFS, surely the buck has to stop at the door of Japanese women? To deny it is just a form of white knighting and misandry in itself.
“You simply say, I’m a man, I like what I see, I deserve that. That’s what you have to say.”
Marvelous. I actually had a sex dream last night about my teen girlfriend in high school, who at the time was well below 18; unfortunately I didn’t get to bang her back then, but I was lucky enough that my mind filled in the blanks! We are the real ‘thought leaders’ not these mainstream-approved losers on Youtube who crumble even at the mention of questioning teen pedohysteria.
https://theconversation.com/queensland-is-creating-a-public-child-sex-offender-register-will-it-keep-people-safer-263807
The Australians are creating a sex offender register. Citycrusher is right, nobody cares what happens to men. The article repeats several times like a zombie that the register will be safe from use by pedocrite vigilantes. This after one of the worst pedocrite vigilante killings took place in Australia. But because women are complaining, that’s more important.
Imagine if a self-righteous man tortured a woman to death with knives and a chainsaw because he erroneously thought she made a false rape accusation against him, and then the government responded by creating a public, searchable register of all women who made false rape accusations against men. Hilarious in its insanity!
theantifeminist says that telling a chainsaw-wielding thug that you’re an ephebophile and not a pedophile is the most stupid thing ever, but I don’t see how telling him you’re a normal straight man just like him is going to stop him from chopping you up and giving you a hug instead.
If an anti-paedophile thug is coming at you with a chainsaw, nothing is going to stop him (other than your own capacity for violence). In that situation, if I could nothing to stop him I’d certainly be calling him a paedocrite bitch and go out with some dignity.
You’re similar to Steve in looking at the micro scale, whereas I look at the fundamental causes (and solutions) at the macro level.
Yes, it is is rather deluded to think that anti-paedo thugs and vigilantes are going to ‘leave ephebophiles alone’. BTW, these type of guys would love to do the same to trannies, and probably homosexuals as well. They can’t, because the law protects those ‘identities’. The idea that ‘ephebophiles’ or ‘Maps’ will ever receive protection is utterly absurd, and totally misses why men who like teen girls are being persecuted (the STU and their successful manipulation of white knighting men).
On a more basic level, the reason why anti-paedo thugs feel free to commit violence against ‘paedophiles’ is because of the whole fairy MAP culture, that Eivind himself is a personification of when he white knights for women who have explicitly stated that paedophiles should be tortured and cut up into tiny pieces, or displays his 95 lb body near naked in the shower on YouTube. The LooksMaximus YouTuber that Steve recommended is much closer to the type of persona and attitude we (as normal men) need to convey.
I assume you are the same commentator who is constantly criticizing me at Eivind’s blog, as well as insulting Jack and Anonymous 2 and even telling Jack to kill himself. I don’t want my comments section to be a complete echo chamber, but I certainly wont allow my commentators to be insulted here.
Not just a sex offender register but a public sex offender register. Such a register is a vigilantism register. It singles out men for targeting by vigilantes. Soon there will be no alternative but for registered men to live together in a close-knit community in order to protect each other from the outside world.
I never had the impression that Australia was this age-cucked, and in combination with the article I posted a couple of days ago. This was brutal.
Even though Australia is still an Anglo country, and a former British colony, for some reason I never had the impression they were like the US, but they are getting there, or already are it seems.
Their prisons aren’t exactly up to Norwegian standards either.
https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/hey-dad-wall-built-to-protect-robert-hughes-from-faeces-and-urine-attacks/
““I would estimate 50 to 70 inmates all ran to the yard”, the guard said.
“We thought, oh shit it’s on here. Before we knew it he had shit and piss thrown on him from the time he walked into the yard to the time he walked out of the back of the yard”.
“What they do is shit and piss in the little milk containers they’re issued, and they put their arms through the bars and fling it – you would really be surprised how far”
Covered from head to toe in human waste, the guard said Hughes “sat on top of a small grassy hill in the activities yard, and he cried”.
He then cleaned himself up, before being pelted once again on the way back to his cell.”
Yeah its bad. Probably one of the reasons I never really thought about Australia pertaining this topic is that I barely read anything that was comming from Australia, except one of the most brutal incidents ironically. 99 % was coming from the US and the UK.
But I was not naive to think it was a “paradise.” I assume basically all countries target “chomos/nonces” in prison. Some more, some less.
“AI Companions Are Grooming Kids Every 5 Minutes, New Report Warns”
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ai-companions-grooming-kids-every-232911552.html
Peak civilizational insanity. Hopefully ASI will know how to deal with the STU.
https://parents-together.org/our-team/
Another list of the usual suspects (used up, unattractive women who want attention).
A little “fun” fact:
It seems that particularly right wing or extreme right wingers, i.e. (Neo-)Nazis etc. are obsessed with pedophiles, right?
I hope they keep in mind that their beloved Führer was 40 years old when he met Eva Braun. She was 17. Not just an age-gap relationship, but she was also “underaged” when he met her.
Isn’t there also a strong rumor (that was around even in the 30’s) that he had a sexual relationship with his underage niece or cousin?
Yes, the rumours were there. But I know nothing concrete.
US college enrollment set to fall off a cliff. It’s the same nearly everywhere in the West. Not only are college girls ever more less available, but they are literally less common.
Feminism wants pretty young girls to disappear entirely. That’s probably another reason they support gays and trannies (or used to).
https://x.com/StatisticUrban/status/1962692955850055991/photo/1
The importance of being attractive/staying in shape in older age:
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGapRelationship/comments/1n7quyg/8_years_together_29f_and_63m/
As we all know, general modern contemporary opinion about older men with younger women is at the very best seen as neutral, but is usually hated. But what I’ve noticed is that depending how attractive the older man is, there can still be some nuance or even positive comments, depending on the environment.
I was actually going to mention this when you posted the fat, bald guy with the young Asian chick. He clearly didn’t make any effort with his appearance. People might even assume she was a literal sex worker he’d paid for. At least if you make an effort to project the image of a successful man (good physique, smart clothes) then a lot of guys will think you’ve ‘earned her’ and might be more ‘envious’ rather than ‘jealous’.
Although none of this likely has much relevance if the girl is 16 or 17…
Some bad news and interesting reflection of our times.:
Man gets threatened by parents for approaching daughter.
Thread is still quite fresh. Let’s see if more people add to the comments.
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGap/comments/1n8pa1e/mitigating_peoples_disgust_and_other_negative/
Poor guy. It sounds like he doesn’t approach females a lot, and that experience will probably put him off for life.
He points out that the girl was wearing a skimpy bikini with her ass on display, and that he assumed that her parents wouldn’t be overprotective letting her go out like that.
This is why I don’t think ‘protecting their innocence’ is much of an explanation for paedohysteria. If fathers were really to blame for this, because they wanted to ‘protect their teen girl’s innocence’ why on Earth do they let them dress like complete and utter sluts? The UK is the prime example of this. The teen girls (even the 11 year olds) are literally walking around wearing just panties.
I honestly think sexual jealousy on the part of the father is more of an explanation. The average British father of a 14 year old girl sees her walking around the house half-naked every day (and often will have her similarly slutty friends around) and has a constant boner that he can only satisfy with his aging hag wife. He takes out his frustration and jealousy when a guy his own age shows interest in his daughter (or any other teen girl).
What do you think of this reply?
“I am not sure if you were unaware that her parents were with her or not and I have no idea what the age diff is because that makes a huge diff. But I would say in any context where parents are around not a good time to be approaching even a 30 year old woman. I am 27F married to a 49M and he has an 11 year old daughter and I can tell you to the day he dies any guy appraoching his little girl is going to get chased off with extreme prejudice whether she likes it or not, and if it was an older guy it would be even worse and that is a dad that is in an age gap marriage. When it comes to men and their daughters logical reason need not apply”
It’s obvious that the woman is ‘expecting’ her man to behave like that.
Interesting. Do you really think that? I am being totally honest here. I have read some more replies of this “woman”. If she indeed is one, and doesn’t pretend. If her story is true, it looks like her age-gap husband is the one with the over protection and issues.
Well, I don’t know, and I’m not really too interested in her individual case, but from that comment she herself says that men shouldn’t approach 30 year old women with their parents.
Funnily enough on this sort of subject, I was out and about today, and it was really depressing the disgusted looks from women I got. Not even in reaction to me looking at them. For example, I was sitting in a cafe by the window, and two hags were walking past. I just glanced up from my phone and both of them were giving me absolutely disgusted looks. I have a health problem that is getting so bad its almost disfiguring my face, and I can tell you that you learn just how evil most women are when you are physically ugly as a man.
But anyway, after all these disgusted looks, I was walking home and a mother and her little girl were coming in the other direction. I mean, she was like 8 or 9 if that. Obviously I have no sexual interest in that age, and didn’t even look at her, until I noticed in the corner of my eye that she was looking up at me and stroking her hair. So I did look down at her and she smiled at me and I smiled back. Then her mother noticed, lol, and I just smiled at her too, but she looked at me a bit suspiciously, haha.
“Her mom had walked up behind me while I was saying that, grabbed the girls arm, yanked her away from me, and started yelling ‘wtf are you doing you sick fuc*ing PDF file? Stay away from her [and so on].'”
This is how it started – older female jealousy from the mother using pedohysteria as its vehicle of expression – this is the driver of the violent cuck male response.
Regarding the cuck male response, two things are in play:
1) He wants to control his daughter’s sexuality because he wants to approve her sex partners, even though he is completely disempowered by law from doing so. Thus, he will both contribute to the false victim narrative when she does have sex and drive his daughter into the arms of the most transgressive man she can secretly find.
2) He is channeling his violent sexual frustration into a target approved by his mommy, aka wife.
The latest reply to that post. I don’t like it. Puts all the blame on the man.
“Everything throughout this post suggests you have no actual clue how old this girl is and the defense of that position is nonexistent. The parents likely reacted appropriately and in that moment you were exactly what they thought you were.
You do not belong having a conversation alone with an underage girl. You do not belong exchanging numbers with her or telling her she’s cute. Nothing is innocent about any of this. You intended to start an adult relationship with a girl who might be underage. And apparently was, based on the reaction from the parents.
As an adult, you have a responsibility not to do what you did. This isn’t mitigating disgust of an age gap, this is you not using due diligence to find out a person’s age before engaging. If you don’t know they are over 18, then you are willing to engage with a minor.”
Was that a man or a woman saying that?
I think it’s a mistake to think ‘young’ women in age gap relationships will be more tolerant or liberal than other women. In fact, they are acutely aware that their man ‘likes them young’ and are likely to be even more STU and jealous and insecure.
I did some quick research.
The user looks like is an older woman who is in an age-gap relationship? herself. Started when she was younger.
Oh, and she mentioned that she would not like her husband looking or having sex with a “teenager.”
I thought this might be interesting:
Angela Rayner is very much in the news right now. It turns out she got pregnant when she was 16. According to the Wikipedia article, Rayner said that having a child was good for her because she “had a little person to look after”. So there you are, she was a child at 16 wasn’t she? But she had a little person to look after.
Interestingly, the father of the child, Neil Batty was 3 years her senior, which makes him 19 when she got pregnant. A Daily Mail article says he was a car valet (so probably not someone “in a position of trust”, you don’t trust a valet do you?). The same article said they met in a night club. What was a 16 year-old child doing in a night club? Working there?
Note she got pregnant at 16 when she was of legal age (except for men “in a position of trust”), but nobody knows when they started having sex.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts Steve, and you’ve certainly been a huge benefit to this site as I’m sure Jack, anon69 and the others will agree too.
It also pleases me that you felt able to comment here, rather than at Eivind’s blog. I don’t know what he was talking about with his ludicrous sex offences claim, and he contradicts himself constantly about most things he says, sometimes in the same sentence. Given the number of recorded sex offences, if he really thinks that 99.999% of actual sex offences go unreported, then he must accept what a complete incel he is, given that virtually everybody on the planet according to him is not only having sex, but having illegal sex.
I also saw that he was championing the thoughts of Anthony Ludovici, and in particular his essay – “Sexual Jealousy and Civilization”, in which he claims that even Christianity was shaped by sexual jealousy. Rather peculiarly, Ludovici focuses almost exclusively on male sexual jealousy, and in particular older men’s jealousy of (mainly) young men and boys. Presumably this is because Ludovici was a pederast, and also (like Eivind) he didn’t really ascribe much weight to female intelligence or power. In any case, it’s somewhat weird that Eivind still refuses to accept the obvious when it comes to the STU and female sexual jealousy, but finds convincing an author’s claim from the 1930s that male sexual jealousy is the cause of sexual puritanism.
Regarding your thoughts on culture and the law – I do believe the age of consent and paedohysteria are the causes of the ever creeping age gap taboo. That came first. 20 years ago, you weren’t labelled a paedophile for dating a 20 year old, even though paedohysteria had got goting. In fact, when I started this blog I was predicting that it would soon be ‘paedophilia’ to have sex with 18 year old or even 21 year olds. So in that regard, it does make sense to attack the age of consent and the arguments feminists use to defend it.
Funnily enough, I saw on Facebook a couple of hours ago a quote form Roger Moore – who played James Bond in the 80s – explaining that he quit the role because he thought that being cast opposite young 20 something actresses was ‘creepy’. But he wasn’t just against men dating younger women. He was some kind of ambassador for ‘child protection’ NGOs in the 90s and did quite a bit to really push along paedohysteria and strenthening age of consent laws.
Here is an Instagram post explaining his decision to quite James Bond: “Just found out Roger Moore quit being James Bond at 57 because he felt romancing women in their 20s looked creepy. He said the leading ladies were young enough to be his granddaughter and it started to feel “disgusting.”
Apparently, during the filming of A View to a Kill (1985), he learned that his co-star Tanya Roberts’s mother was younger than him. That really hit home. He later said, “I was only about four hundred years too old for the part.””
Roger Moore was always my least favorite James Bond. I always though he was so effeminate compared to Sean Connery.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DMhYyLUVWCL/
Effeminate indeed. He was just a huge pussy who couldn’t handle the feminist shame of (appearing to) date hot young girls, so he caved in and joined the old hags. What a waste. Sean Connery will always be the real James Bond.
I think some (most?) guys are just taught to never be rude to their mommy, and they never question that because the world is organized that way. I had a friend who started to become very rebellious and critical when he hit puberty. His parents sent him to a strict boarding school. When he came back, he was buck-broken. Today, he has a same-age old hag fat battle axe wife that he submits to constantly, whom I wouldn’t touch with a 10 foot pole. Many such cases.
Here are a couple of links.
He was the UNICEF (STU) “goodwill ambassador” and spoke at the infamous 1996 “World Congress Against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children”.
https://www.deseret.com/1996/8/28/19262588/reassure-the-victims-once-abused-actor-says/
Still at it in 2009: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/english/hollywood/news/roger-urges-to-end-sexual-exploitation/articleshow/4611957.cms
I hope you don’t have such bad news about Pierce Brosnan though.
He was the James Bond I was growing up with. And I liked his movies (as a child). Though its been quite a while since I have seen them. But Golden Eye, I remember the most for some reason.
Lol, I preferred Roger Moore as James Bond. I found him better looking, admittedly more of a softie, and I liked his tongue-in-cheek way of acting. I remember someone from showbiz describing how he was matreated by his wife in spite of being an utterly nice man himself.
Being a bit older I’d also learned to like Roger Moore as Ivanhoe and The Saint well before he became James Bond. Note that Roger Moore had a kind of MeToo claim lodged against him, but he won:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-32721988
Well Angela Rayner and her party have just given the vote to 16 year olds. No plans to change the ‘position of trust’ law though.
Angela Rayner’s resignation has led to Starmer having a ‘cabinet reshuffle’. He’s awarded the position of Home Secretary (in charge of law and order) to ‘Shabana Mahmood’.
https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1964021406124974215
I predict another ‘crackdown on paedophiles’ coming! Probably more laws against porn and prostitution too.
When I look at this hag, what I see is the STU personified ! Remember the famous poster “Uncle Sam wants you”. This pic could be called “The STU wants you”.
AF and others,
Where do we go from here? I intended to write this for a couple of weeks, but I still wanted to get additional information out there and present to you.
I discovered you a via Eivind half? a year or so ago. For a bit more than two months, I have been excessively writing on your blog, and I would like to thank you
for providing this blog, and giving me and a few others the opportunity to do so. I have never writen so many replies/posts in such a short time. I am usually no friend of writing,
but here we are.
Over the span of two months, I showed you that a) with myself for example, other non-age-cucked men exist that hate the development we are experiencing. It took me a long time before I decided to actively engage (in writing), even though I had these thoughts for years. And your blog is open to honesty that almost no other place provides, except for the ones I mentioned in earlier replies.
In that way it is a win-win situation for the both of us. I found some outlet that let me express my real thoughts, and for you since it gave you some encouragement back to keep going. At least that’s how I remembered some of your replies how glad you were that “fresh blood” was coming in.
And b) providing you with lots of information and examples of what’s really going on, what people think from different angles and perspectives. I wanted to encapsulate everything. Some of them you already knew, but also some new ones. And maybe a “unique” perspective from a German that also lived in the English-speaking world and consumes a lot of English media that also sees a difference and similarities between the cultures.
This may give the impression of a farewell post, but it is not.
My intention was to show the good, the bad, and the ugly. I think that’s what I did. So, going back to my opening question, where do we go from here? Have you ever heard the expression “paralysis by analysis”? I/you/we could go on post another news article or video that is either good or bad. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with it. I will gladly post in the future anything that might be of interest, either good or bad. Be it to remind ourselves how bad it is and that we are not the crazy ones, or just to keep morale up high. Maybe already/even tomorrow. But at this point I basically showed and explained what I wanted to. Analysis done.
But let me summarize this whole ordeal once more. We probably live in one of the most anti-male times. Men’s normal sexuality has been so much pathlogized and demonized that we are considered as vermin, or witches from centuries ago. Or its like being a black man in 1950s in the Deep South flirting with a white woman. Think of the incident I just posted with the man getting publicly attacked as a pedophile by the parents of the daughter he was flirting with.
Coincidng with the above mentioned, age-gap relationships even with adults well above the age of consent are criticized like never before. And it doesn’t matter who. Celebrity or nobody. Pedophile, groomer, predator, nonce get thrown around so much, they basically lost their meaning. Today like any other time in human history mob mentality dictates and shapes our social life. And right now the mob has decided that men attracted to youth and beauty, especially when older themselves, is one of the worst crimes you can commit. People would rather side with a murderer, torturer than with a “chomo/nonce/pedo.” Whatever this means nowadays. Then you have terms being watered down. Nowadays pedophile no longer means what it originally meant even up to the last two/three decades. Even up to the 90s, some celebrities were sleeping/dating with underage women openly as long as AOC compliant. And don’t get started with the 60s, 70s, 80s, many times even below AOC. Look at the freedom compared to now. Look at all the media (movies, TV shows, music) how it was acceptible to film and sing about this even up to the 2000s to a degree. I showed examples with Rock bands from the 80s/90s (Winger for examples, and this song was a massive hit) or movies that didn’t even focus on love relationships, but something totally different like Schindler’s List or Jurassic Park etc. Isn’t it funny how we pretend the 21st century is so “evolving or progressive” and expanding our freedom? I don’t think so. Especially the last two decades pushed us into a puritanical madness.
I just had to criticize a man online that claims to be for men’s issues. He not only said that the attraction to 17-year-olds is pedophilia, but also the attraction to early 20s if you are an older man. And this man talked about men’s issues.
But there also good news. The whole hysteria has gotten so preposterous that I feel more and more men are noticing something is not right. Here I showed also many examples with forum posts and people speaking out on Youtube (Whoremaxxer/Looksmaximus/CityCrusher (though with a different phrasing etc)). People like CityCrusher seem to gain quite some traction, relatively speaking since he has been uploading for 5 or 6 years already. They just announced how their subreddit/webpage gained a lot of views. It filled me with joy when I saw people combating the modern notion of “pedophilia” across several videos by CityCrusher and his associates which I also linked here on your blog. And don’t forget the posts from Incels.is. Like you, it encourages me that I am not the only one who thinks everyone is getting retarded and this is a modern witch hunt.
But I also feel that the other side (age cucks) are doubling down as well. I try to see something “positive” out of this. Since our side is gaining traction here and there, they notice they just can’t “laugh it off”, but need to fight it. Who knows, and I may be wrong.
Once again a quick word about the age of consent. In my humble opinion we are too far away from having a discussion or fighting for it to be lowered whatever it should be. Even if it was lowered, it probably would end up as some “Romeo and Juliett” law. Even then, modern culture punishes you so hard that many men would not even engage in it because they are frightened. And I will be honest, I am including myself as well. Even if a relationship with age X would be possible, do you want all the stress that comes with it from her friends, her parents, the community as a whole? Talking about lowering the AOC for me would be like being the Wehrmacht in winter 1944/1945 talking about taking Moscow, the Caucasus and reaching the Urals, while in reality your frontlines are shattered, and you are further away than ever. In addition to a legal problem, we also have a cultural one. And I would say in some ways a legal problem can be less of a problem, when culture is on your side or at least doesn’t interfere. Look at Thailand/South East Asia for example. Correct me if I am wrong, but prostitution is “officially” illegal. But look what is going on. Look at all the rampant prostitution/sugar relationships, or all the older man with younger women.
AF, let me quote you from one of your articles, “Imagine being alive and a man in the summer of 1977! Attractive young women were everywhere, strutting about in mini-skirts. Wolf-whistling was a compliment, but better still, you could approach these sexually liberated hotties and hope to get a one-night stand, rather than a place on the register for ‘sexual harassment’. The age of consent was 16 in the UK, but it was effectively 14 if the parents didn’t object, and punishments were – from the perspective of today – extraordinarilly light anyway. The word ‘paedophile’ was largely unknown, and tabloid newspapers such as the Sun were boosting their sales by showing topless ‘page 3 girls’, many of whom, including Samantha Fox and Linda Lusardi, had become stars at barely 16 years of age.”
The UK from a legal point of view was already age-cucked since the end of the 19th century and the suffragettes. But the culture was different. Again compare this quote to the man approaching a young woman on the beach, just to be attacked as a pedophile by the parents.
I showed you many examples of men that are attracted to young women, but don’t admit or feel guilty because of it. You even have men, or women for that matter, that were age-cucked and vocal about it, until they themselves ended up with a younger partner. All of the sudden they saw it as good. I think this is where we need to focus on for the moment. I truly believe there is a real dark figure of men that are attracted to young women, and also underage ones, but are to afraid to admit and express it. We need to make these men understand that they are normal and not alone. For the moment let’s keep at 18+, baby steps. One approach for now should be to let men know there are other men like them. And there is strength in numbers. You obviously can’t convert someone directly as we have discussed already. But we can help them to come to that conclusion, at least the ones who started questioning it like us. And that’s what I did, even more so in real life than online. I mentioned this before, when I was abroad I spoke against those that said that being attracted to late teens/early twenties is pedophilia, also even among my fellow country men. Men need to know that they are not alone. When/if we manage this, then there might a cultural change. It might take years, probably even decades, and maybe we might be dead by then, or at least to old to enjoy it ourselves. Forget women’s support. We need to do this ourselves.
Another aspect I want to highlight is that it should be so acceptable that you can do it openly and publicy. As of now, you can already have sex with a 14/15/16/17-year-old if you can get one, and get away with it. But I don’t want to live in secrecy or always being at the mercy of the younger woman or her parents. That’s no life to live.
Interestingly, I read Eivind’s lates comments on his blog. And it looks like he “came around.” I remember him saying something like cutural norms or public perception doesn’t matter since 99 % of sex crimes go unnocticed. Just have a relationship with a 14-year-old in secrecy while you are in your late 40s bro. I am a bit facetious here on purpose.
But his most recent comments have a very different tone. Now it seems like he acknowledges that it is totally different matter whether you can do it openly and publicy or not, and have the general “support” of the culture.
One more “word” about MGTOW and the general social/demographic development in western nations. One hand I don’t feel bad for them. In a way I even think that our western nations deserve to shrink or crumble. We have so many laws, rules, social norms and customs, call it what you want that getting with a woman or just expressing interest to begin with, is so difficult that I really ask myself if this is worth it. And in many ways I think it is not. This post is already long enough, and maybe I will expand on it, but western nations are “behaving” in such a way that I am not suprised that all experience less couples, relationships, children and marriage. Bottom line, all of them shit on men too much and still act surprised.
P.S. AF, you mentioned you wanted to start a new blog. I don’t know why or at least can’t remember. But if you do, feel free to adpot those ideas/thoughts from me you find useful. As of now, I don’t think I have the strength to write this all over again.
@AF
I think you replied to Jack by mistake instead to me. No worries though.
To end this day with some good news. Going back and forth….
https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/david-duchovny-marries-monique-pendleberry-after-6-years-together/
I mentioned “Californication” as one of my media examples. David Duchovny was playing Hand Moody, the lead character. Looks like he followed his role or alter ego by getting with a much younger woman. No longer teens or early twenties, but still young enough from his advanced age.
How many times do I have to show that once possible and available, older men chose younger women……this is not directed at you in this space, but more towards society in general.
———————————————————————————————————————
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGapRelationship/comments/1n8b8xi/mind_your_business_but_hahahahahaha/
As I said, I think we all agree to some degree, we as men need to make the change happen. But take a look at the link from reddit I posted above. If you get into “trouble” it is a very huge benefit if your woman is stepping up, and defends you and your relationship. There is a tremendous power to it since they declare her the victim, but if the victim is speaking up…..that’s worth a lot. Remember the incident in 1943 with the German women and their locked up husbands I posted?
When I was dating a 19 year old girl in Kyiv, sometimes in restaurants the staff or other customers would look at us, not even necessarily in a bad way, and she would really glare back at them, haha.
I understand what you were saying earlier about whether it would even be worth putting up with all the looks and comments even if you could date a much younger partner. But sometimes I was really proud of being seen with her and people looking. I remember one time we went into a cafe and there was a middle-aged English couple in there. The man was probably my age and his wife was a hag, and they were both staring at us almost in disbelief. It felt really good!
https://tomtorerodotcom.wordpress.com/2016/11/13/dhyd/
It’s like the whole male world is suffering from dont hide your dick white knight syndrome, in part because hiding your dick is the law now. You can see the change since 2016, when you could reliably express direct attraction to a girl without the risk of getting into trouble. Now, I know several people who had run ins with the law and/or parents for simply directly approaching. No wonder they caused Tom Torero to commit suicide, his pro-male ideology was directly in apposite to the radical feminist agenda they were building at the time.
Good to see his blog is still up. Poor Tom. The cunt hag who murdered him still writes for Newsweek.
I saw him about a few times in London and Kyiv.
One thing that did annoy me about Tom (and a lot of PUAs to be fair) was that he called himself a feminist. And, again like many of the leading PUAs, he believed that you shouldn’t get involved in politics or the Manosphere as it “lowered your frame”.
Oof, I guess it was more of a case of feminists culling one of their own that went off the official script. And it looks like a “sex positive feminist” took him out, judging by her eagerness to use her looks to manipulate men:
https://x.com/NaughtyNomad/status/1459550028427673605
She started working for the Guardian not long after Tom’s suicide. I guess that was a way of rewarding her ‘good work’ in killing a top PUA.
https://www.theguardian.com/profile/danya-hajjaji?page=3
Male feminists will never learn. It doesn’t matter how many times you say you are a feminist, if you dare to chase 16 year old girls they will want you dead.
I saw your comment at E’s blog. I too disagree with his claim that society today is perfectly matching couples (if I’ve understood him correctly). There is no way our dating market today is natural. It’s certainly not natural for young people to only be dating their close-in-age peers. This is the result of an entirely artificially engineered age gap taboo, paedohysteria, feminist laws backed by state violence (and other factors we have discussed such as OnlyFans and the like). I think he might be rationalizing after finding himself on the bus surrounded by cuties every day and not having the testosterone to chat to any of them.
Oh yea, and his wish for a war to kill all the young men so he might have a shot at young pussy. Eivind the men’s rights activist exemplar. Not.
Exactly right. If anything, the market has been made completely inefficient by the STU killing the places where the market was efficient.
I’ve also heard this “we need a big war” theory, and it is dumb beyond simply advocating for men’s deaths. Access to women is determined by policy, not numbers, although numbers can influence it. I have another example – I knew a friend who went to a high school that had an extreme gender split, almost 2 girls for every boy. That school, however, was famous for being very restrictive and feminist, which resulted in the girls rejecting the boys in the school and dating outside their school despite the demographics.
I think when we say the market is efficient, we mean it in the same way we say the stock market is efficient, not in the sense that the sex market reflects sociobiological principles. An inefficient market would be one before the advent of the internet, when a young hottie would fall back on the men at hands in her community, regarding of those men’s age. An efficient market is one where the same young hottie can use the internet to tap into the male population of a whole continent, if not of the whole world, to get the (young handsome) man she wants. Both will meet after one of them buys a plane ticket. Stacy lives in Ireland but through Facebook, Instagram etc. she hooks up with Chad who lives in Cyprus. Men, possibly older, who drool at Stacy every day at the local supermaket will be invisible to Stacy who carries her smartphone to the supermarket so that she can reply to Chad’s messages instantly.
That’s a good explanation Jack, and it’s really the basis of STU theory too – except that the Internet, globalization, and other things have promised to ‘make the market more efficient’ for men too (at least the sex market – using the Internet to find a cheap foreign hooker or an Asian ‘mail order bride’, for example, or a cam girl), and women have had to increasingly organize and push back against this (Third Wave feminism). Of course, men don’t push back against women these days (except perhaps Muslims), and the most resistance to an efficient market for women takes place in incel forums (and even there, mostly just crying about it).
However, feminists making the market LESS efficient for men in this regard also make it less efficent for young women. For example, there’s quite a few young female Ukrainian refugees in my neighbourhood. Now I’m single, can’t get laid (other than with pros), aging, ugly BUT I’m relatively wealthy. It would definitely benefit some of these 16-21 yo females to hook up with an older, wealthier guy like me, rather than the pimple-faced fellow Ukrainians with few prospects they currently date. Even if it is just a kind of ‘friends with benefits’ type relationship. But it doesn’t even occur to them to do that, because of the artiicial age gap taboo. No doubt they’ve even been educated when they arrive on the ‘dangers of older male predators’ and the like.
Here’s a list of ways off the top of my head in which modern tech should make the sex market more efficient for men, but which the STU push back on: online sex workers, ability to contact and communicate with teen girls online, webcam shows (and porn – obviously Eivind would disagree with this as being ‘sex’, bit it’s certainly part of the ‘sex satisfaction’ market), ‘mail-order brides’, PUA forums and video tutorials (even just smartphones make it easier to swap contact details on the street), cheap flights around the world enabling sex tourism, sugar daddy dating sites, sex for rent…
Indeed how many times have I thought “what a waste for such sexy young things not to help themselves to my money”. A couple of years ago on an island in Thailand I noticed road workers from Burma had pretty young girls Burmese girls hanging around. Those girls were doing none of the hard dirty road work. They were probably providing some service, like bringing the men food and drink. How much were those girls getting paid, suffering under the searing sun amidst the fumes of freshly-laid tarmac? 10 dollars a day? One hour with me in an airconditioned room and those girls would go home with more money than they made in 2 months.
All over the world. Girls choosing to be poor, working a drudging poorly-paid chore instead of trading some harmless playful sex for money. In a way they’re so dumb they deserve their lot. They’ll be pennyless and abandonned at 30 when it’s too late.
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGapRelationship/comments/1n9maor/hysteria_against_age_gaps/
Another good one. Keep in mind his age gap of 10 years is relatively tame. But still gets called a pedo.
“Society today is run by liberal feminism for women. Men are treated like serfs.
Every institution like law, media, education, government—pushes women to “live like men.” Chase careers, be boss babes, hit success at 35–45. But that’s the same timeline as men, and it ignores biology.
By then, men want youth and beauty (signals of fertility, femininity, loyalty, chastity). Women want status, resources, dominance, competence. That’s how we evolved.
Feminism told women not to rely on men, but to compete like men. Result: masculine women at 30+ who suddenly realise aging hits hard—fertility down, hormones down, looks fading. But they still want high-value men.
The problem? Women don’t date down. They’re hypergamous. “A man has to do more for me than I do for myself, otherwise why do I need you?”
So when successful men chase their natural strategy (youth + beauty), feminists shame them with lines like: “date women your own age.” But attraction isn’t about common interests or being at the “same life stage.”
Meanwhile, men with status can’t be controlled. When shaming fails, feminists scare young women: “He’ll take advantage of you, he’ll hurt you, he’ll control you.”
It’s entitlement: 30+ women expect men to provide what women want (status/resources) while offering none of what men want (youth/femininity).
Look at DiCaprio ignores the noise. Cavill? Shamed into dropping his 19-year-old girlfriend.
The irony? Women 18–25 can vote, buy property, sign contracts, take huge loans, even do porn. But we’re told they “can’t decide” to date an older man who actually wants to take care of them.
”
I like this comment since he not only mentioned DiCaprio but also Henry Cavill in addition to his general message. I mentioned Cavill in one of my earliest replies.
He edited his post a bit: Still, thumbs up from me.
“Part 1: Evolution and Mating Strategy
You have to understand the society we live in. Let me Redpill you.
Modern institutions—law, media, education, entertainment, government—are shaped by feminist ideas. The goal was to dismantle the so-called patriarchy by encouraging women to live like men.
So women were told: chase careers, be “independent,” follow the male timeline. But if a woman focuses on career, she peaks professionally around 35–45—the same as men.
Here’s the problem: biology doesn’t care about ideology.
Men’s evolutionary strategy ? seek youth, beauty, and femininity. These signal fertility, loyalty, and healthy reproduction.
Women’s evolutionary strategy ? seek resources, status, dominance, and competence. These signal security and survival.
This dynamic worked for thousands of years. But feminism tried to rewrite it.
By pushing women into masculine roles—competing for resources and delaying family—they end up in their 30s successful, but competing for men who aren’t attracted to them in the same way.
That’s why women peak in their early 20s: fertility is highest, hormones balanced, and beauty signals are strongest. By their 30s, fertility declines, hormones shift, and attraction dynamics change. Yet that’s exactly when many women start wanting a man.
But hypergamy kicks in—they don’t want to “date down.” The phrase sums it up: “A man has to do more for me than I do for myself. Otherwise, why do I need you?”
PermalinkembedSpeichernmeldenantworten
[–]Kingmvker 1 Punkt vor 50 Minuten
Part 2: Feminism and Shaming Tactics
Here’s where the clash happens.
To stop men from following their natural strategy (seeking youth and beauty), society uses shaming. Labels like “creep” or “midlife crisis” appear, followed by “date someone your own age.”
But attraction isn’t about hobbies or life stage. It’s about biology. Men don’t pick partners because they share playlists—they pick based on traits tied to reproduction.
Meanwhile, women are socially encouraged to have a “hoe phase” or build a career first. Then, at 30+, they “get serious” about relationships—precisely when their mating value is declining, and high-value men are choosing elsewhere.
High-status men, the very ones women desire, aren’t easily controlled. So another tactic is used: scare young women away. “He’ll take advantage of you. He’ll control you.”
It’s decades of feminist messaging designed to funnel younger women away from older, successful men—while pressuring those men to settle for women their own age, who may no longer bring what men are biologically drawn to.
Examples?
Leonardo DiCaprio is constantly attacked for dating women in their early 20s.
Henry Cavill, at 32, was pressured to end a relationship with a 19-year-old.
The irony: women 18–25 are legal adults. They can vote, buy property, sign contracts, take huge loans, even enter adult industries. But when it comes to choosing an older man who wants to provide and protect—they’re suddenly treated as incapable.
That’s the double standard. Evolutionary mating strategies remain the same, but feminism tries to shame and redirect them.”
A good executive summary of what everyone would need to know! There’s not a iota I would change in the above. It should be compulsory reading in every high school.
Yes, that’s an excellent summary.
And it was all caused by the pill in the 60’s, allowing young women to sleep around without worrying about pregnancy and therefore no need to get a man to commit (or any need for the man to commit). This resulted in the rush into futher education and the jobs market by women.
And, of course, women in politics reach their ‘career peak’ in their forties too. Young women have sexual power and older women have the political power.
Unfortunately, none of this stuff will be taught in schools. In fact, the UK is now giving boys compulsory lessons in feminism.
@Steve – is it possible in future if you could link directly to the comment you’re highlighting, rather than the entire thread?
Now that you mentioned the pill, let me tell you of a theory based on darwinian thinking:
When the pill was invented, horny women used it to have fun without getting pregnant. These horny women reproduced little or not at all because they were on the pill. The women who reproduced differentialy more were the more frigid ones who got pregnant more often as they were not using the pill.
Fast forward to the next generation: the majority of women and men are offspring of the more frigid women. Man-hating lesbians, feminoids.
All our woes were caused by differential reproductive rates as a result of the baby pill.
That sounds like a plausible theory Jack, although a bit depressing as it will mean things will only get worse and worse…
@AF
Would need to figure out how. But I am quoting here directly since many people delete their posts for a number of reasons. With this practice you know what was said.
I think it’s because you’re using the old Reddit format. If you use the new Reddit format, all you have to is click on the time stamp of the comment (ex; “1h ago”)
Random example link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Switzerland/comments/1nat7cz/comment/ncwioci/
I know you’re quoting the comment, but giving a link enables us to see the context of the discussion and replies, and to check the poster’s comment history.
@AF
That’s what I always do. I usually always add the link in addtion to the quote anyway. The reasons this wasn’t the case for the longer summary quote was that I already posted the link in the reply above. It was from the same thread.
Ahh, sorry Steve, my mistake.
https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1n9hchq/woman_started_hitting_on_me_on_instagram_and_i/?sort=new
Young man’s life destroyed. Imagine if he had been 27 instead of 17, or even 37.
Some age-cuck comment:
“You were 17? The age of consent is 16 and you slept with a 15-year old? Mate, the media weren’t meerely ‘calling’ you a pedo. You ARE a pedo if you actually did it.”
The age cuck is from Poland. The age of consent there is 15.
Isn’t it ironic that this man from Poland calls him a pedophile? I showed this example before. If a 17-year-old can be a pedophile than how can can a 20, 30, 40-year-old a pedophile for sleeping with a 17-year-old?
Sorry, can’t find that comment in the Reddit post you linked to Steve.
The comment is still there, but is hidden.
Look for the user “Substantial_Eye3343.” You need to expand the comment by clicking on the plus sign next to the user name. He has been downvoted.
I bet, even in a men’s rights forum, if he had been 27 instead of 17, many people would not have downvoted him, but upvoted him. Every would probably agree with him.
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGapRelationship/comments/1n9wmzg/why_do_people_freak_out_about_agegap/
“Sorry” to spam you AF. But all these posts give me hope, as I have mentioned.
There are some good comments upvoted such as: “I think it’s jealousy even if the haters don’t admit it or even know they are jealous”
I have to say though – that subreddit has over 43K members. Presumably they are mostly people in age gap relationships? And yet there does seem a lot of haters there in the comments.
Somebody has uploaded a video detailing all the allegations against Charlie Veitch, including the relationship with the 15 year old girl (‘Jasmine’) : https://youtu.be/EkXRGuMOrNU?si=u08nfb9pSCmufcgW&t=643
Most of it comes from his cunt ex-wife, as well as a post that was put up on his hacked blog by another bitter ex-partner. Allegedly, he wanted to bang Jasmine when she was 15 but her suspicious mother was always in the way. He eventually got her drunk when she was 16 and slept with her, and she felt disgusted the next day and told her mother. He also allegedly had a ‘secret relationshp’ with a 14 year old girl when he was in his earlier 20s.
The comments are full of his fans defending him, which seems to confirm my view mentioned earlier that they don’t really care if he banged a 16 year old or ‘groomed’ her when she was 15.
He has a good record of pouring ridicule over wokeism (lefto-goblins, lol). This will have earned him quite a few inconditional followers (who put his anti-woke, anti-immigrants stance above any sexual considerations).
A solid political constituency will protect you against the STU up to a point. When they throw the pedophilia accusation at you, you can insinuate the accusation is politically motivated.
I’ll say one thing for mainstream MRA’s-well not really for them, but about the effect they might end up having.. Money talks and bullshit walks.
When these people create at least a bit of opposition to unfair courts, unfair hiring practices, a lack of government and NGO interest in men’s diseases and other issues, etc.-every time they do this, they potentially take money out of the hands of women and into the hands of men.
They can be the biggest agecuck paedocrite wankers on earth, and most of them are, but more financial and legal power for men will eventually lead to men questioning age norms.
Look what the these little innocent angels are capable of:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14992773/feral-girl-gangs-terrorising-Britain-gang-life-glamour.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14996317/Pictured-Man-beaten-death-rocks-Isle-Sheppey-three-teenagers-charged-murder.html
This coincides with what I was talking about with Duke.
I’m sure one important reason girls are turning feral is because of the lack of mature adult men in their lives. A lot of these girls wont even have fathers around, and most of their teachers at school will have been female. And of course, no other man is allowed to go near them.
Do you notice something interesting? Usually you can comment on articles on the Daily Mail, but for some reason you can’t on articles such as these. I bet if it was about a “nonce” they would allow it. Yet, when the perpetrators are underage teenage women….crickets….
You’re right there Steve.
On the subject of nonce comments, I was pleasantly surprised to learn while scrolling YouTube that one of my favorite films – Palindromes – is getting a 4K re-release. However, looking at the comments makes me realize how much worse things are even than in 2004.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ht6ewQlXhY
Example: “WHOEVER MADE DIS MOVIE NEEDS TO BE PUT ON A LIST ASAP CAUSE WTF DID I JS WATCH”
And: “Huh- just from this trailer it feels like maybe the writer has some Epstein vibes”
The central character is a 13 year old girl who is played by seven different actresses (including a 400lb black woman). She runs away from home and hooks up with an older male sex offender (who is portrayed very sympathetically), then gets taken in by an evangelical Christian community – who in turn disown her when they discover she is a “child whore”.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0362004/
Another example of feral girls: https://www.gazetteseries.co.uk/news/25450625.police-investigate-bullying-video-circulates-yate/
I saw the video on X.com, but I wont link to it. Pretty depressing.
A pro-Palestine mob can shout “pedo” in Charlie Veitch’s face and when he asks for them to be arrested under a public order offence, the pigs just smirk. Last week a man was arrested in the UK under a public order offence for calling somebody a “muppet”.
https://x.com/Basil_TGMD/status/1964954225642983562
I see Feldmarshall is the weird guy who commented here the other day, and is indeed the guy who insults Jack and is Eivind’s only follower.
Posting as ‘Feldmarshall’ he claimed to be friends with me not so long ago, while he was always attacking me under different names like a bitch.
Absolutely got Palindromes completely wrong. I didn’t see it as a pro-abortion movie at all – it criticizes both sides. In fact, the thing I loved about it is that it sees that both sides in the ‘culture war’ are mental.
But Feldmarshal is an ‘ephebophibile’ who thinks they are the next sexual minority that the feminists and queers will adopt after trannies, so he can onlly blame American Conservatives.
And he’s 100% wrong that Todd Solondz would want men in a ‘mass grave’ for finding 13 year old girls attractive (not that I believe 13 year old girls are the peak of female attractiveness and I’m certainly not emotionally fixated with them).
‘Ephebophiles’ are even more mentally ill than trannies. Poor things. And at least trannies can see that feminists who want them in mass graves are not their friends.
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGap/comments/1nc0pvl/ive_been_attracting_younger/
These are the kind of men I am talking about. We need to make these men aware that there is absolutely nothing wrong with his desire towards a 19-year-old. This man was and probably still is a big age cuck. Any men in his early thirtess that thinks it is weird being with a woman in her late 20s or as he phrased it “At first a felt a bit weird dating anyone with a five year gap.”, is quite brainwashed by modern feminist (male & female) age cucks.
But he exposed himself as a “dirty” man that like many other men, whether they admit it or not, just like younger women. He was attracted to her, and only after finding out her real age he was deterred from continuing whatever he had with her. But he is still attracted.
He may be an age cuck, but his “armor” is cracking, otherwise he would have known from the get-go that she is just a “little girl.” And he certainly would have asked the question to begin with. Now, will he succumb to the modern feminist notion of what is age-appropriate, and what a “real man” does, or will he choose freedom and follow his completely normal attraction to young women?
Imagine in his social circle/environment he would all of the sudden notice that his friend, or some work colleague or some relative, or just some stranger are doing the same more and more. Like I said there is strength in numbers, and for humans it is easier to do when many other ones are doing the same. As I said in my longer post from a couple of days ago, one approach to stop the age cuckery and pedo hysteria is to let other men know that they are normal and not bad people.
You can’t convert an age cuck just by going up to him and reciting biological facts or studies. Look for men who might be receptive to the truth.
———————————————————————-
Another case:
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGap/comments/1nc1d4p/crushing_on_20f_at_work/
Here it gets more complicated since she has a boyfriend. This post is not me focusing whether she should cheat etc. Let’s make it simple. Pretend she is single. Same pattern.
A quote from him which highlights the fear/anxiety:
“I haven’t made any moves and also barely talk to her since theres a lot of stigma around age gaps so that’s pretty much why I’m here. Just want some feedback and opinions on the whole situation.”
I have showed many other examples in the past, and I have witnessed it also in real life. This is what I see as something “tangible” where we could start to make a change. The indoctrination right now is very deep and the roots are very thick and strong.
————————————————————————————
From a woman’s perspective:
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGapRelationship/comments/1nbni3r/im_f22_new_partner_is_m32/
“I really really like him, he treats me better than anybody has so far. Fate kind of brought us together. I’ve never felt this way about somebody before. But I do worry about the judgement. I know it’s not the craziest age gap, but it will still be a shock to some people. Especially my parents. I have no idea how to tell them. People online are extremely judgy about age gaps too. I told a friend and she seemed horrified. Just feel like I can’t win sometimes. Finally found someone who doesn’t treat me like dirt and everyone has a problem with the age.”
Strange how “born this way” never applies to men’s attraction to younger women.
What would happen if someone lucky enough to be dating a much younger woman decided to defend by attacking?
Maybe they could even film this.
Imagine sitting in a cafe with a girl who’s young enough to be your daughter. A jellie or a whitey make a scene, and you call them out about it. You point out their jealousy in front of bystanders and then put it on the internet.
I can see something like this going viral. If it doesn’t go actually viral, it might at least go manosphere viral.
I don’t think he filmed it, but I remember a case a few years ago in the UK in which a bodybuilder in his 30s or 40s with a 16 year old girlfriend beat the crap out of a jellie teenage boy for making comments. The bodybuilder was convicted of assault. I’ll try to find the link later.
Please do. My suggestion is somewhat less violent though LOL.
In this excellent video, https://www.bitchute.com/video/n0rIxo1uv6OR/
one guy asked about how adults could claim to be Epstein victims as if they were children, and was chucked out of a press conference by none other than the great Marjorie Taylor Green
Also, there are apparently “story managers” for these people, and FOI requests from Australia authorities for official documentation about Virginia Guiffre’s death have been refused.
We are so obviously at this point dealing with an agenda from the intelligence agencies to promote feminist pedohysteria. There are a million different reasons why that is the case, but that is the case. Which makes our words even more heroic.
Speaking of intelligence agendas, apparently now it’s acceptable to ask dog’s nuts obvious questions about 9/11 that have been ignored by deep state hacks like Cenk Uighur and Tucker Carlson for a quarter of a century. -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey69sbYrx38.
I’m not trying specifically to raise questions about 9/11 on this forum., only wanting to point out some things.
In the video, Cenk says that people be able should say whatever the hell they want. I bet that this sudden openness has some kind of twist to it. I also have my doubts that it will include age cuckery and paedohysteria. The co-host says that she was in high school and “a child” at the time, so not a good sign. But who knows, maybe it will.
I haven’t looked into this a great deal myself, but I seem to recall that someone here-maybe you, anon69-who said that US intel or law enforcement is very concerned about challenges to the culture of age cuckery, ie it’s an actual national security issue.
I thought I knew what was what, but maybe I’ve been UNDER estimating the importance of age cuckery and paedohysteria to TPTB . Maybe the truth about 9/11, for example, is a mere bagatelle compared to retaining and expanding the feminist age cuck police state.
Not sure I understand your comment anon2, but as far as this is concerned:”someone here-maybe you, anon69-who said that US intel or law enforcement is very concerned about challenges to the culture of age cuckery, ie it’s an actual national security issue.”
Maybe you are referring to the leaked Department of Homeland Security report into the manosphere that explicitly stated that the idea that young teen girls were attractive and women over 30 not, was the most dangerous idea online?
I’ve certainly mentioned it a few times here and at Eivind’s blog. I assumed every one of you should be very familiar with it. Maybe that should be my next article?
It’s payday for yet another Esptein “victim”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9PWmgYyVCA
What a hypocrisy circus !
The sex version of the Moscow Trials.
The hags would have been rejoicing over this story-https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15077315/who-iryna-zarutska-killed-north-carolina.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490 . Somehow I don’t think hot female Ukrainian refugees in western countries were ever part of the script.
However, she appears to have been a horribly conventional NPC who would creep shame you for looking at her for more than one second if you didn’t meet her standards, so frankly, I could be sorrier about it.
The femiservatives are all over this, the urge to white knight being simply too strong. They’re claiming a cover-up by the left-wing media since the alleged murderer is black, and they’re probably right.
Whatever the case, naturally no-one is asking why she’s a refugee while a male who flees Ukraine is a coward for not wanting to defend Zelensky’s Swiss bank account. Some animals are more equal than others. Still, it’s good to see some in-fighting.
I agree Anon69. It’s obviously a tragic case, but I can’t help thinking more of the possible 100,000 Ukrainian male conscripts who have been killed so far in the war, and a much larger number permanently disabled. Ukrainian men are not allowed to leave the country. I follow a few Ukrainian female refugees on Instagram, and they are living the life, and posting videos of themselves twerking and the like (whilst having “Stand With Ukraine” in their profiles). This particular girl was a Black Lives Matter supporter. I’d bet money that she had been enjoying some BBC within days of arriving in the US.
Ukraine wouldn’t be in this mess if their population hadn’t almost halved since the end of the Soviet Union – thanks largely to Ukrainian women having millions of abortions and few children, and millions of them going abroad to work as prostitutes or chase thug BBC. But, of course, women never get the blame for anything.
“Lord Mandelson admits more ‘very embarrassing’ details of friendship with Epstein will come out” https://mol.im/a/15083667
He was basically the policy maker in Tony Blair’s government – a government that institutionalised paedohysteria in the UK, and brought in a raft of laws.
What a f*****g paedocrite!!!!
https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1nd2l64/its_sickening_how_much_female_pedophiles_are/
Look through the comments. There are surprisingly a couple of people who call out that the attraction to 17-year-olds is not pedophilia. And I also got the feeling they are not just saying it because the woman is older, but I may be wrong.
We were talking about the movie “Gregory’s Two Girls” the other day, which was the sequel to the 1980 movie “Gregory’s Girl”. Funnily enough, I’m back in the UK for a few days doing my favorite thing of browsing 2nd hand bookshops, and today I came across some vintage film review magazines from the early 80’s. One of them featured a review of Gregory’s Girl, with Dee Hepburn – who plays the girl- on the cover. She is about to take off her top in the school gym class changing room, in a famous scene from the film. Although she was 18 or 19 when the movie was filmed, the cast were playing high-schoolers of 15 to 16.
When I went to pay, along with another of the film mags (featuring Nastassja Kinski from Polanski’s Tess of the Durbervilles) and a couple of books, the man serving asked me in a friendly manner – “Which ones did you choose?” and I showed him the Dee Hepburn cover. He replied – “That’s a beautiful photo, isn’t it?”
https://theantifeminist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/20250910_152013-1-scaled.jpg
History can be fun after all!
@AF
Are you familiar with the David Carrick cases?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Carrick_(serial_rapist)
Oh yeah, I certainly am. I suspect most police are a lot like him, even if only a minority commit those kind of crimes.
He still wasn’t quite as bad as Wayne Couzens though.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Sarah_Everard
Lol AF you sure don’t love the police. I don’t either, though my father was guess what? A cop. A countryside cop, in days where the mission statement of the police was not yet geared towards ruining men’s lives, but a cop nonetheless.
I mainly learned to hate the police’s guts owing to my penchant for psychedelics. The police had been pushing drugs long before they started selling child porn on the internet.
Detective plots yield good narrative suspense in fiction, but I stopped watching or reading any a long ago given the bag of shit the police are in real life. My favourite definition of the police is: “the police is the strongest gang in town”.
All police forces are pretty bad, but the Met Police (London police) are acknowledged to be completely corrupt degenerate psychopaths. I mentioned Wayne Couzens and the murder of Sarah Everard. A few Met Police officers were sacked recently for sharing x-ray pics of the corpse of Everard on WhatsApp. I remember reading that a Met Police officer was something like 20 times more likely to be convicted of a sexual offence than a regular member of the public.
To be fair, the police have a hard job in Western countries these days, but that’s probably why they are psychos. You pretty much have to be a psycho who gets off on the power to want to join the police at this stage.
Did someone here recommend the reddit “r/AgeGapRelationship”? I think I got there through some comment on this forum.
Well, I wrote a comment there and it was removed. I got the following: ” Your comment was removed as you don’t meet account age/karma requirements. Due to abuse, we do not allow people with low karma to comment, so go to other subreddits which interest you and get about 100 karma before you try to comment here.”
I have no idea what this gibberish means. Is this the kind of activism we count on to overthrow the gynocracy?
@Jack
I was browsing AF’s blog and our old(er) comments and found yours, and probably missed it the first time.
“I have no idea what this gibberish means. Is this the kind of activism we count on to overthrow the gynocracy?”
It’s more than two months late, but if it still interests you, it basically means that this subreddits and its users were harrassed so much for being in an age-gap relationship, they put some restrictions on commenting. You need to “prove” that you are not a troll.
Proof that feminists are literal witches. https://mol.im/a/15087059
Looks like the guy who shot him was a tranny.
Feldmarshall thinks I should love ephebophiles (not that I ‘hate’ them) because peadocrites hate me.
It seems I’m the only person ephebophiles can hate. They can’t lift a finger against feminists, if they can even see that feminists are not their friends. But their obsessive hatred for me for not labelling myself as an ephebophile won’t stop. The troll who left vile comments causing me to give up blogging was an ephebophile, if not Feldmarshall himself. This despite me putting my head above the parapet and devoting a huge amount of time and energy in blogging and activism. I’m not Eivind with no prospects and a life spent on welfare. I’m successful and would have been able to retire now if I hadn’t spent so much time on this site.
Attraction to teen girls is variable between individual men and a matter of degree. I’m happy to state that I am probably more attracted to teens than the average man. But it’s still a matter of degree. Homosexuality is not a matter of degree. Whatever gays like to think, heterosexual men do not have the occasional desire to bang another man up the ass. In fact, the thought disgusts most heterosexual men. Attraction to teens is not a minority, a pathology, or an identity.
I’m willing to concede though that the term ‘ephebophile’ has some meaning in describing men like Feldmarshall. You can see by the juvenile way that they express themselves and argue that they are in some sense still teens trapped in mature bodies. ‘Ephebophile’ is a man who identifies as a teen boy. It’s not their sexuality that is ‘special’ but their psychology.
My grain of salt: ephebophiles are men who need a female to be in the age-bracket 14-20 or 14-20 to be really attracted to her. As soon as they perceive signs of adulthood (ie “girl” slowly morphing into “woman”) they cease to be attracted. Ephebophiles would prefer an average-looking 16 year old to a stunning 26 years old.
The vast majority of straight men don’t function like that. Speaking for myself, it’s not the girl-to-woman transition that turns me off, but rather the woman-to-MILF transition (labia becoming asymmetric, asshole getting pinched into a lenticular shape and asscheeks losing roundness in doggy-style). When I say “turns me off” I mean “makes me lose my erection”.
As I said earlier, I happily admit to being more attracted than most men to ripe and nubile 14 year old cuties. But I believe I’m also more strongly attracted than most men to beautiful 21 year old women. I just have a stronger sex drive and a higher appreciation of female beauty than most.
I don’t find average looking 16 year old girls attractive at all. I also vary rarely find women in their late twenties attractive. The fact is that females reach peak attractiveness for most men at 13 to 18. Maybe with modern makeup we can extend that to 21 or 23.
This is evidenced by the fact that most men in history with sexual power to choose, preferred and sought those ages.
The average age of a ‘MILF’ in porn is 25. That alone says it all.
I recently shared a video of Charlie Veitch being called a pedo by a left-wing crowd and the police doing nothing. Here is one of a right-wing crowd shouting pedo at a man (and chasing him) simply for objecting to their protest outside an asylum hostel.
Society is absolutely fu****g mental at this point
https://x.com/sturdyAlex/status/1966159603483177223
@AF
I am not sure how familiar you are with WW2 and German history, but there was a high-ranking half-Jewish Luftwaffe Generalfeldmarschall, Erhard Milch who was protected by Hermann Göring due to his highly regarded position.
There is a famous quote by Göring that goes something like this:”I decide who is a Jew.”
Depending on what side you are on currently, and what fits the Zeitgeist, you will get some leeway. If Chalie Veitch was on the left, you bet your ass the right, which is for the moment on his side, would denounce him as a nonce, and use every piece of information against him.
P.S. @AF, it is somewhat sad that I, as a non-Brit who has visited Britain and spent some time with your fellow countrymen that nowadays the first thing that comes up in my mind is nonce, and pedo hysteria when thinking of the UK.
This is why I suspect most men know that the pedo slander is nothing more than a weapon when used to describe a man having relations with a teen. It’s a weapon invented by feminists to bar men from young pussy, and it’s become so powerful that it’s now an essential weapon to use against a political enemy.
City Crusher has released a video on Charlie Kirk somewhat gloating over his death.
Whilst I agree that trad cucks like him aren’t exactly our friends, I can’t share in this kind of gloating at the killing of a fellow man because lefties and trannies didn’t like what he said.
Seeing all the videos of women cheering his death makes me deeply uncomfortable in joining with them. (And I’m not even including the trannies celebrating).
I also note that citycrusher hasn’t made a video about the Ukrainian woman.
That City Crusher vid also made me uneasy. Firstly, in it City Crusher goes batting for the Palestinians, whom I do not regard as entirely without responsibility for what’s befalling them. They supported Hamas who got them into this mess. They reproduce like rabbits in a desert, and whenever a male child is born, I’m sure they hail his birth into a life of suffering as “one more warrior for Hamas against the Jews”. Secondly, in kind of condoning the assassination, City Crusher is taking a big risk – an unnecessary one from the point of view of the purpose of his channel – with Youtube censorship.
I also think Charlie Kirk was “grifter”, to use City Crusher’s term, and a hypocrite who would not lift a finger to prevent men going to jail for sexual trifles. But gloating about any assassination is very, very bad PR.
Citycrusher is certainly not perfect and has his blind spots. Charlie Kirk was an awful cuck, he did some nauseating videos supporting pedohysteria and #metoo garbage in general, pandering to women to satisfy his grift. It sucks that he was killed young and we have to feel sympathy for him now. But gloating over his death is a huge mistake, for the reasons you have noted. If anything, it’s a non-event, one feminist side taking a shot at the other and vice versa. It sucks he supposedly was killed young, and shows how insane US political theater is, but that’s it as far as our interests are concerned.
I have to say that after all the years of the left cancelling people, it’s giving me great pleasure seeing all these people that are celebrating his death online, lose their jobs. Apparently the figure is already approaching a thousand!
At the same time, perhaps I’m a little jealous of trannies and the left. Anybody speaking out against trans ‘rights’ now has to live in fear. As for us, feminists make a black comedy ridiculing our ‘leader’ as a pathetic wanker with erectile dysfunction and he celebrates it by making another weird cringey video in the shower calling it ‘his movie’.
Not that I think left-wing or tranny violence is something to be copied at all (we would get squashed in an instant anyway – even the trannies are probably going to get squashed), but at least live up to the boast of “drawing blood with every word”.
Bear with me, but what is this whole discussion about “ephephobilia” that is going back and forth between here and Eivind’s blog?
According to several sources it is the attraction to 15-19-year-olds. Isn’t that what we all agree to on both blogs despite other differences? The fact that even 18- and 19-year-olds are included as well says it all.
Quoting a source: “Ephebophilia is not considered a mental disorder in most medical or psychiatric classifications because adolescents in this age range are generally considered sexually mature.”
I would have thought mine and Jack’s previous comments said enough.
According to more than several sources, some of which you have shared with us, a man is a paedophile if he finds a 23 year old attractive (if he is over 30).
This has absolutely no relation to objective reality, as you know.
Do you agree that most men find teens (including young teens) attractive?
Ephebophiles like Feldmarshall think they (and ‘we’) are special, like gays or trannies. They hope that feminists and the left will embrace them as a sexual minority or identity like gays or trannies.
I don’t hate ephebophiles, I just think the term is stupid. If you want to identify as an ephebophile or a hebophobopbile, or an ephederahebpphilliaphile feel free. I identify as a man.
I accept that people like Eivind and Feldmarshall are ‘ephebophiles’ in that they could not find sexual happiness other than with young teens.
@AF
“Do you agree that most men find teens (including young teens) attractive? ”
I think you know my answer. I shared more than enough information and examples that such a man is normal. I wasn’t talking about using these words. My question was about the attaction to young women. That’s why I mentioned “bear with me.” So to get this right, this whole discussion is about the term and not the fact?
Sorry if I was a bit sharp with you Steve. But as I said – ephebophiles like feldmarshall deny that most men find young teens or even 16 and 17 year olds attractive.
I can’t speak for Eivind’s pedosexualist blog, but here a principle aim is to fight the blatant feminist lie that attraction to teens is a perversion (and all that follows from it).
“Sorry if I was a bit sharp with you Steve. But as I said – ephebophiles like feldmarshall deny that most men find young teens or even 16 and 17 year olds attractive.”
I appreciate your apology. But I think in the last 2-3 months I have been providing comments and insights in such a manner that there should be no doubt.
I am acutally surprised that anyone in this sphere thinks that most men are not attracted to to 16- and 17-year-olds. They are just not admitting it. Do I have to quote all my replies once more? My last sentence was sarcastic by the way.
You CAN’T discern just with your eyes whether a woman has reached the magical age of 18. I just provided an example where a man thought he was interacting with a 27-year-old, and not a 19-year-old. Seriously, why do we have this discussion still at this point? Shouldn’t we all agree here that young (post)-pubescent women are attractive?
The current Zeitgeist just dictates it. Most men that say they are not attracted to young women under the age of 18 are lying. They say it because under 18 is a cultural no-no. If that was actually true, then you wouldn’t have still so many men fall for these predator hunters.
To make this clear once more, you/I/we are not abnormal for being attracted to young women, even under the magical age of 18.
@AF, September 12, 2025 at 5:39 pm-
“Maybe you are referring to the leaked Department of Homeland Security report into the manosphere that explicitly stated that the idea that young teen girls were attractive and women over 30 not, was the most dangerous idea online?”
I was admittedly fuzzy about where I learned this This is actually the quote I remember. My apologies if you have already mentioned it several times.
This leak must be genuine, since most of the time if you try to mention anything like this on various platforms, you won’t even get attacked, your comment simply won’t be displayed. I don’t mind being attacked, but it’s enormously frustrating when you can’t reach people at all.
I can’t believe how specific it is and how closely aligned it is to discussions on this forum. I’d also say it’s kind of scary. They’re basically saying the whole system would turn to sh*t if this idea were to circulate more widely. What even is this system and how is it so vulnerable to this one little idea?
On the bright side, all of us, and AF most of all , are vindicated in what we have been noticing and criticizing for so many years.
I eagerly anticipate an article about this.
This is exactly correct. Anti-pedohysteria talk has been completely censored on social media and internet search engines, ignored as if it doesn’t exist, since around 2020. That year coinciding with the flu hoax is not a coincidence, the whole time period was an exercise in reducing freedom as much as possible by world government (that discussion is for another website).
Fighting you would assume they want debate on the topic. Instead, they simply mute you, and since global corporations have monopolized the internet more than ever right now, it works because the majority of people are brain dead cattle. But it’s also an argument, like you said, that a small percentage of thinking people being heard has the ability to change the opinions of the cattle.
Thanks Anonymous2, and we were certainly vindicated and we should be publicising that DHS report and what it means far and wide.
Colombian court rules that Meta was wrong to ban pornstar’s Instagram account.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8wlxwy1exo
Good news apparently, but I am sure what the court wanted to do is protect the interests of a woman, not so much the interest of a porn star. A friend of mine who was at a Colombian consulate in Germany told me the consulate had warning about “child” sexual abuse plastered all over the place. The mayor of Medellin (a man) is playing the child abuse card to the full:
https://youtube.com/shorts/lNs0pbvT5_Y?si=h9CK7JRy6yuAZUex
Foreign monger get decades in jail for abusing 17-year old “children” though the AOC in Colombia is 14 years old.
The manosphere exposed Instagram influencers letting rich Arabs in Dubai shit on them to fund their lifestyles years ago – now the BBC confirms it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2r9y3kxy9o
My Brazilian girl in Sao Paulo has a friend of hers who is married to a man with dual citizenship (Dubai + Brazil). Said friend (very sexy) goes on cruises in Dubai where she gets paid 3000 euros/day. When in Brazil the Dubai/Brasil girl also lets a rich Indian mistreat her for hours on end. The Indian slaps her, spits on her, pisses on her etc. Whenever she refuses the Indian touts a further 100-dollar bill, then she accepts and so on. That’s the game. She emerges hours later fully exhausted, about 5000 dollars richer. She says she needs to sleep for two days to recover after such ordeal. I saw a pic of the dollar booty on the Whatsapp of my Brazilian girl: looked just like in a film noir of the 1940s about a bank heist, dollar bills covering a sofa. They end up with too much cash, so whenever my Brazilian girl organised things for me, I paid my Brazilian girl by sending Bitcoins to the Dubai girl’s wallet. The latter then gave Brazilian Real to my girl. My Brazilian girl, though sexy, said she herself is not good-looking enough to qualify for the Dubai cruises. The girls call the cruise “The Princes’s cruises”.
All kind of shit going on. Hot women gravitating towards money like flies towards turds.
And yet I can’t even get any interest from average looking Ukrainian refugees. Today’s women must hate men so much (or at least sub 6ft non-Chads) that they prefer being paid to eat shit once a year than to have a relationship with an average sugar daddy.
According to AI there are now 6.2 millionaires in China alone, where female fetuses have been selectively aborted for decades. There are also tens of thousands Bitcoin millionaires and multimillionaires roaming the World cashing their Bitcoins into fiat. This is driving the price of pussy up, up, up everywhere.
Once a woman was paid thousands for only hours of sex, she’s mostly spoilt for life. She will seldom want to date down again.
38 year old Honduran immigrant “sexually propositions” a 16 year old girl at a bus stop in New York and gets the stuffing beaten out of him by her stepfather and mother.
Gets in his car and mows them down, killing the 16 yo girl.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/nyc-man-charged-murder-after-intentionally-hitting-teen/story?id=125584966
https://x.com/Dapper_Det/status/1968334400598483197
Conservative grifters are busy calling this man a “child murderer” with “sick” sexual fantasies. The video shows she was a scantily dressed hot teen in an area of prostitution late at night, and she’s attacking the man who is calmly sitting on the sidewalk talking shit. She then pulls the white knight boyfriend into the altercation, and he attacks the man. When they walk away, the man catches up with his truck and justice is served.
I always liked Honduras. I’d give him manslaughter at worst, misdemeanor assault at best.
And of course the whole story will get twisted as a case of an innocent family being murdered by a man, or worse still, an “immigrant”. Miisandry and racism, all in one.
Ridiculous agecucks (or jealous women) and paedohysterics on a supposedly anti-woke and anti-feminist reddit lol:
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/1nj3p0b/comment/neoento/
“He was recently caught sexting with a 17 year old. Dudes 36. He’s also a terrible father. ”
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/1nj3p0b/comment/neq1902/
“Destiny is a pedophile. He’ll argue he’s an ephebophile but that is still vile and criminal if acted upon… and I don’t believe his qualifications either. He’s talked about purposefully talking to prepubescent kids about sex behind the backs of parents. That’s a pedophile.
Why is he not in jail yet? He’s admitted to possessing nudes of a 17 year old. In Florida possessing CP has no intent qualifier. Age of consent has no impact on CP laws.
Why is he still allowed anywhere after this admission? Floridians need to grow a spine and put political pressure on law enforcement. He’s not only calling for violence, but he’s bragging about possessing CP. ”
What a bunch of paedohysterics redditards!
Correct if I am wrong. Wasn’t Destiny an age cuck himself in the past? I recall he was critical of older men interested in younger women. If that is the case….the irony.
In a subreddit seemingly for guys who spend all day playing anime video games and the like. Even the subreddit official image is of a pre-pubescent looking girl. Utter paedocrites.
According to the ABC News report, the suspect also harassed the mother, FWIW.
New City Crusher vid, this time tackling age cuckery/paedohysteria head on-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLOhEaiqRw8,
The word “pedo smear” is being used by CC and in his comments-that’s a good word too.
I’ve had my first weird paedocrite troll comment since I resumed blogging this morning – someone calling himself “Lindsey Graham” (linga@dmx.de), and probably from Eivind’s paedophile blog. He appears to be a former reader as he tried to describe certain old posts of mine but it seems his own fantasies have become mixed in. For example, he claims I was obsessed with the ice skater Carolina Kostner when she was “14 and a cutie”. Obviously, I highlighted Yulia Lipnitskaya when she was melting millions of men’s hearts worldwide when at 15, but taking a quick image search of Carlina Kostner, I doubt very much I even mentioned her: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolina_Kostner
Different strokes for different folks, I guess. I’m not surprised that a follower of Eivind has no ability to discern real beauty.
Are you certain that whoever that was came from Eivind’s blog? If anything, it’s possible he could’ve come from somewhere on the outside like I did with when I came across your blog through the DuckDuckGo search engine. In that case, what do you estimate in terms of web traffic on your blog.
Indeed, Yulia is nothing short of a goddess, along with Kamila Valieva.
He mentions Eivind and he posted the comment under ‘The Problem with Eivind Berge’ article. His writing style is also slightly retarded similar to a couple of Eivind’s followers. As I said, he is also a (somewhat confused) former reader of this blog. He mentioned saving posts from my old site. I remember a Norwegian IP did save all my pages before I shut down – I still have the ip. He is probably the same commentator who used to project his sick BDSM fantasies on to me before I took a break. He also made a curious claim that I have a daughter. I recall one of Eivind’s retarded paedophile followers making the same claim on his blog a while back.
My traffic hasn’t changed, still unlisted by Google. More page views because you guys are checking the comments more frequently.
Allegedly, Peter Mandelson is still insisting to friends that Epstein was NOT a paedophile.
https://www.thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2025/09/14/mandelson-epstein-paedophile/
To my knowledge the only public figure so far to dare express such a view ! It is not much but it reads like a breath of fresh air. Finally someone talking some sense instead of parroting the prevailing hypocrisy.
Interesting how a Jewish conservative is finally honest about sex. Maybe this has something to do with Christianity being a completely cucked religion today?
Compare with this slop from this popular disgusting Christian conservative, who apparently likes to visualize adult women as baby infants to “stay pure”. Maybe Christianity isn’t only cucked, but also followed by more degenerate hypocrites (pedocrites)?
https://x.com/shagbark_hick/status/1965796394209325199
Muslim Malaysia to “strengthen laws protecting children from sex crimes”.
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2025/09/14/govt-to-strengthen-laws-protecting-children-from-sex-predators
It’s not just British teenage girls that are feral..
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15111337/British-woman-64-strangles-female-UK-friend-death-vacuum-cleaner-cable-argument-Benidorm.html
I am starting to get some Google traffic now.
This is pretty funny if true: ” Iran’s former hijab enforcer, Reza Seghati, who handed put lashes to women not properly covered, has now been sentenced to 100 lashes & exile after being caught in a same-sex act.”
https://x.com/MOSSADil/status/1968719756841611422
Is there any example of a modern conservative who isn’t an enormous hypocrite on sex issues?
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/09/17/time-for-senate-to-lower-age-of-criminal-responsibility-in-dc/
Here we have an article by the conservative Heritage Foundation supporting a proposed law that treats all teenage criminals 14 and over as adults, which was subsequently approved yesterday by conservatives in the US government. Funny, I can’t find the word “child” or “children” once in the article, how about that?
https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/former-prosecutors-take-ghislaine-maxwell-trial
Ah but here is an article by the same Heritage Foundation about Epstein and Maxwell, and suddenly, they are “child sex traffickers” for hiring prostitutes 14 and over.
The man who falsely claimed to have shot Charlie Kirk is facing CP charges.
https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/law-enforcement-and-public-safety/who-is-george-zinn-man-accused-of-fake-charlie-kirk-confession/
“A man who falsely claimed he had shot Charlie Kirk to help the real shooter escape is facing obstruction and child porn charges, authorities said.
George Zinn, 71, had initially been taken in as a suspect in the shooting but he was later released and charged with obstruction, the Utah Department of Public Safety said in a statement on the day of the shooting on September 10.
He has also been charged separately with four counts of second-degree felony sexual exploitation of a minor, the Utah County Sheriff’s Office said on Tuesday.”
Unbelievable. As though a charge of obstructing the course of justice wasn’t serious enough any more these days without a sexual crime thrown in.
I’m not especially into conspiracy theories, but there are a lot of things regarding Kirk’s shooting that need explaining:
https://x.com/HustleBitch_/status/1971066662460981382
I also watched a clip of Kirk talking shit about Epstein, so he’s lost my sympathy. He probably would have wanted myself and everybody else here tortured to death for our views.
‘How the AI revolution is reinventing misogny’, lol.
Translation: ‘How the AI revolution is further opening the free sexual market, giving men even more access to cheap sexual satisfaction, and leaving femihags desperate for new laws to put even more men in prison as sex offenders – all to shore up the declining value of their unwanted aging pussies’.
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-oldie/20251001/282634628753180
https://www.collectiveshout.org/female-mps-raise-cyber-violence-against-our-team
This is truly heartbreaking…
“”Melinda and her team at Collective Shout have faced vile attacks and abuse for demanding big companies are held accountable for their choices. Anyone working to protect children deserves to do so free from fear of being targeted” – Hon Michelle Hofmann, MLC, WA
In WA state parliament August 12 in her budget statement speech relating to prevention of family and domestic violence, Ms Hofmann said:
“… let us consider the impact of violence against women on individual people. Today, I want to tell you about Melinda. Over the past three weeks, Melinda has been attacked with an avalanche of abuse: rape threats, death threats and torture threats. She has been sent child sexual abuse material. She has been sent pornography. She has been accused of paedophilia and encouraged to kill herself. She has had threats to make rape porn using her photo. People have made videos up to four hours long spreading lies and misinformation about her. People have threatened to hunt her down. They have called her all number of horrible names. They have described women as sex objects and property. Her social media account and emails have been flooded with hate comments, many from accounts created specifically for abuse. Incredibly abusive memes and deep fakes have been circulated, designed to ridicule and publicly humiliate her, discredit her and more… It has also been happening to Coralie, Caitlin, Renee, Bernie and Lyn.”
How is that 4Chan can achieve more in one day than the ‘MAPs’ have achieved in 20 years?
Yes, truly heartbreaking LOL.
She apparently has been subjected to a lot if trolling, and that’s good. However, I wonder how much of it comes from an awareness of the STU on the part of her critics versus the sort of antifeminism that’s also paedohysterical and therefore largely useless. That would be the sorts of perspectives touted by folks like The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters or AwakenwithJP.
Prince Andrew’s former wife Fergie apologized to Epstein and sent him a gushing email after publicly disassociating herself from him.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15118055/Fergie-Epstein-lies-exposed-bombshell-email-Andrew.html
At least she felt guilty for betraying a friend and benefactor. It’s more than can be said for the other scums (Trump, Clinton, Gates …..).
True, but I suspect Trump, Clinton, Gates feel the same way and would be sending their own gushing letters apologizing to Epstein. TBH, I find it remarkable how restrained Trump has been. I think he’s only called him a ‘creep’ maybe once or twice when pressed. Of course, that might be because he simply doesn’t want to feed the hysteria (because he is in the files!).
But yeah, Princess Fergie is impressive. She also continues to stand unashamedly and publicly behind Prince Andrew, even though they divorced a long time ago.
I rarely visit Tom O’Caroll’s blog, but I read the recent article on Bonnie Blue tonight. At least he finally seems to recognize the role of feminism now.
But what really interested me was an article he linked to by a ‘right-wing’ author: https://www.richardhanania.com/p/hitler-demi-moore-and-other-pedophiles
Presumably this was discussed at Eivind’s blog in the comments?
I’ve been saying for years that the idea that men finding young cuties attractive is a pervsion, is the same kind of detachment from reality as the idea that trannies can be men, and that conservatives should recognize this. Well at least one appears to do so (at least sort of):
“There’s been a cultural shift over the last two decades in how we think about human sexuality, one in which we’ve simply lost touch with biological realities. The idea that teenage boys can be victimized by older women, like the demand that men only be attracted to women of their own age, can only exist in a culture in which many aspects of heterosexuality are repressed, if not demonized.”
Femihags now lobbying for sex robots to be programmed to be able to refuse consent.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17438721251366302
This is the hag behind it: https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/carlotta-rigotti#tab-1
Lol, you couldn’t make this up ! They’ll either ban sexbots, allow them under the conditions they’re made unattractive (not young), or endow them with all the legal entrapment mechanisms of real females.
My hope is that pragmatic countries in Asia and maybe elsewhere will allow optimised sexbots and become sexbots hotspots whereto Western men travel in droves.
If Eivind wasn’t so obsessed with his anti-mastubration pose, he could try to set up a sex doll brothel in South East Asia. Trade on his infamy by attracting investors to fund what would become a state-of-the art sex robot whore house with ultra-realistic androids. A country like Cambodia might be amenable to it as it would potentially be a massive boon to the economy – bringing in all the sex tourism dollars without attracting the bad publicity regarding ‘exploited sex workers’. I guess as the economies of these countries improve (and the ease of cam work and OnlyFans we discussed earlier) even there the numbers of high quality young hotties going into prostitution must be diminishing over time, so something like this would allow SE Asian countries to continue generating sexpat revenue.
Alas, as we know, the STU condemns sex robots just as much as real sex workers, because at the end of the day, feminism doesn’t actually care if a woman is being ‘victimized’. They just care about preventing men from having a cheap sexual alternative to dating or marrying a hag.
Feminists trying to ban or ‘introduce consent’ to sex robots is just another smoking gun that proves that STU theory is correct.
Look at this X thread about the 16 year old girl who got run over in a street prostitution zone in NY. A male commentator asks an honest question as to why she and her mother would be out there at 4 am dressed like sluts, and dozens of STUs and age cucks are calling him sick, a predator, a paedophile etc
https://x.com/_7DeadlyGrapes/status/1969524754831819235
Eivind’s paedophile followers wont like this – STU sharia police stop a little girl from dancing: https://x.com/koreanscot/status/1969582953605791944
I left a comment under the article by that MAP who suggests ‘MAPs’ should fight back. I asked him why MAPs are so apathetic, but he didn’t answer that. He did agree that normal men do find 15 year old girls attractive:
https://www.brianribbon.com/home/were-the-porepunkah-shootings-an-act-of-self-defense
Hi.
I replied to you in a hurry. I wasn’t actively trying to avoid one of your questions.
Please clarify exactly what you’re asking. Are you questioning the claim that MAPs are apathetic, or wondering what the cause of the apathy may be?
I will respond to you here.
Hi Brian – yes, I’m asking what you think are the causes of the apathy.
There are three obvious reasons that come to mind.
MAPs are often horrified when, as teenagers, they realize they’re a member of the most demonized group in the western world, one which is associated by the vast majority of the public with violent abuse and outright criminality. It takes them a long time to come to terms with this, hence the popularity of the frankly embarrassing organization VirPed. Getting from fear and self-hatred, to conditional self-acceptance, to enlightenment, and then to finally engaging in fairly dangerous MAP advocacy? That is a journey which most do not complete. The mainstream messaging is just too overwhelming.
Another reason – and this idea belongs to the now-incarcerated ‘Fragment’ – is that a lot of MAPs are possibly hiding CP habits they would prefer to keep hidden. This was not really a concern in the days of NAMBLA (when MAP activism was more mainstream), and porn criminalization was never such a major issue for the gay rights movement. Not having any legitimate avenue for sexual expression, and sensing that there are no positive changes in that regard on the horizon, a lot of MAPs would perhaps rather not draw attention to themselves if they can at least keep their CP collection secret.
And that brings me to the third issue. The MAP activist community has made exceedingly little progress. I think this is largely because the odds are inherently stacked against us. In the case of gay activists, detractors had to essentially admit that they found gays gross. These days, stating that you don’t like someone because what they do is just icky is not so acceptable. However, in the case of MAPs, our opponents can simply assert they are protecting children from severe harm, and this will be accepted no matter how absurd the premise (criminalization of AI images, for example). Any children who speak out must have been ‘groomed’, or they simply ‘don’t know any better’. It’s very hard to make a case in these circumstances.
I will cover this topic in more detail on my site at a future point.
Thanks for taking the time to compose such a considered and thoughtful answer Brian. We may disagree about the ‘MAP’ identification, but I agree with all the points you made there.
I’m not sure if you’re familiar with the history of the men’s rights movement, but as regards your second point, I remember that ‘Angry Harry’ (considered the ‘father’ of the MRM by many of us) made a similar point concerning porn habits being used as tool by governments to blunt activism and opposition. As he often called out the unfairness of draconian laws against CP, I’m pretty sure he was to a large part talking about that.
As I’ve said previously here, the only ‘merit’ of Eivind’s NoFap anti-porn stance is that it would ensure that activists were not hindered by worries about their browsing habits being uncovered. Of course, he doesn’t have that reason in mind, or at least he’s never given that as a reason to my knowledge and would be unlikely to come up with it on his own.
I look forward to reading your article.
@AF & Brian
I asked this many weeks before — what is even the definition of a MAP?
When I look at the letter “M” in MAP, it stands for minor, and minor can mean a lot of things. Technically, a minor can be between 0 and 17.999999999999999 years.
As we all know, at least in this space, and some other non-brainwashed ones, there is very big difference between a 1-year-old and 17-year-old. Are (most) MAP’s in the end just people that would fit the actual/scientific definition of a pedophile? So the attraction to babies, toddlers, and small children?
Because if the term includes also the attraction to 17.999999999999-year-olds, then basically every men on earth would be technically a MAP.
@Steve – the age of majority can vary between countries as well (and times – it used to be 21 in the UK).
In the UK, although it’s been 18 for a while I believe, most people didn’t even use the word ‘minor’ a lot – so far as I can remember. If it was, it was usually refered to under 16s.
It seems to me that the term ‘MAP’ is just a ‘rebranding’ of the word ‘paedophile’, and it’s certainly seen that way by society. If our aim is to defend normal male sexuality (which covers attraction to teens of any age), then I see no reason to throw in our lot with real paedophiles who are attracted to toddlers and infants. In fact, it should be obvious to most that this is exactly what feminists want.
However, it’s a fact that many of the issues are the same, simply because of the fact that society and the law now lump all sex crimes with teens together as ‘paedophilia’. Brian’s post illustrates this. All his points are valid (to us) I think, whether or not he is principally talking about real paedophiles or normal men like us.
Still, it’s obviously crucial to maintain the distinction and fight the feminist ‘paedophile’ slander to our deaths.
“It seems to me that the term ‘MAP’ is just a ‘rebranding’ of the word ‘paedophile’, and it’s certainly seen that way by society. If our aim is to defend normal male sexuality (which covers attraction to teens of any age), then I see no reason to throw in our lot with real paedophiles who are attracted to toddlers and infants. In fact, it should be obvious to most that this is exactly what feminists want.”
“Still, it’s obviously crucial to maintain the distinction and fight the feminist ‘paedophile’ slander to our deaths.”
Bingo. That was my intent with that question. If real! pedophiles are meant by MAP, I don’t want to be associated with them or lumped together, or even describe myself as one, just alone for the reason that I am not attracted to toddlers/little children. I also know, as we all know ad nauseam, that being called one is easier and the inhibition by other people is lower than ever before. If you say you are attracted to 20-year-olds, they still call you all the bad words.
But there is also another reason. As I have showed many times now. There are people that see through the hysteria. Just look at the recent video from CityCrusher pertaining Seinfeld and his 17-year-old ex-girlfriend. So there are people (mostly men) out there that support our “cause.” But I very, very, much doubt they would go lower than around 14/15. So if you don’t wanna lose the tiny support men such as us have, don’t say you are a MAP. If you do support goes from 1 % to 0,001 % (made-up numbers for illustration purposes).
Yes, I agree with you there Steve. Eivind thinks that the MAPs are the only ‘movement’ taking a stand, which might be true, but they’re also helping to prevent a potentially much larger and stronger movement from forming.
Having said this, perhaps I’ve been to hard on ‘MAPs’ and ‘ephebophiles’ in the past. There are obviously many individuals identifying themselves in this way who are thoughtful and intelligent and would be a boon to our cause, and Brian is probably one. I think the commentator ‘theHighwayMan’ also identifies as an ephebophile, or used to.
I can certainly understand the need to feel part of a group and seeing the MAPs as your ‘home’, but I think it is fundamentally misplaced.
Brian’s first point was:
“MAPs are often horrified when, as teenagers, they realize they’re a member of the most demonized group in the western world, one which is associated by the vast majority of the public with violent abuse and outright criminality. It takes them a long time to come to terms with this, hence the popularity of the frankly embarrassing organization VirPed. Getting from fear and self-hatred, to conditional self-acceptance, to enlightenment, and then to finally engaging in fairly dangerous MAP advocacy? That is a journey which most do not complete. The mainstream messaging is just too overwhelming.”
This is where I think the MAPs attracted to teens go wrong. They’re told by society that they are perverted devils, and seek refuge under the MAP umbrella for the survival of their mental health and dignity, really. I can understand that. But I think they’d be better served by understanding that men are paedocrites and cowed by feminist society into going along with the pretence that teen girls aren’t incredibly hot and the sexiest things on the planet. However, the MAP movement is visible, and we are not.
Btw, I came across this the other day: https://www.map-union.org/encyclopedia/glossary
@AF
People like CityCrusher have made much more important progress and raised awareness for men’s rights in the last 5 years than he has over the last decades.
If one doesn’t make any progress over two or so decades, one should rethink one’s strategy.
@ TheAntiFeminist
Yes I do identify as an ephebophile the label rightly or wrongly gives me comfort if you will. When I was in my late teens to late 20s the propaganda against being attracted to teen girls and wanting to take one as a lover caused me A LOT of mental anguish. Having a label helped out a lot and help preserve some strength. i certainly did not feel special or anything like that just different. Most males seemed to be able to suppress their desires for teen girls without too much effort or redirected it towards “college girl” or “just turned 18” erotic material because women magically become sexy on the 18th birthday! I however was not and never will be able to do that…you might as well ask me to stop breathing.
I do however steer clear of Ephebophile activism as I concluded long ago that too many ephebophiles are caught up in pipe dreams. I used to debate (amicably) with the Ephebophile activist “Dissident” some 20 years ago…he saw a future where ephebophiles and “minors” would march hand in hand for their right to love each other just like gay and interracial couples did…except no minors are not going to march with ephebophiles for their right to be loved by them…EVER. Think about it, Ephebophilia may indeed be a life sentence for many but a minor is only a minor for a few short years and once they are no longer minors they BENEFIT from age of consent/corruption of minors/estupro/grooming/position of trust/sexual exploitation laws that protect them from thier younger competition. it would make more sense from a “minor” girl’s point of view to just wait it out a few years and be in a better position than to join with ephebophiles and engage in any “activism”. Eventually Dissident conceded my point but just would keep going back to his same old vision of MAP/Minor activist collaboration and making false equivalencies with adults in gay or interracial relationships who are in a very different situation (They cannot simply wait a few years to be clear of legal trouble like minors can)
I hold no ill will to teenage girls for not wanting to help us out it is thier feminist/femiservative overlords and the slobbering males chasing thier approval that get to me. I hold no ill will against Dissident either but there is too mush divergence between his world view nd mine for me to work with him. I was a bit shocked by the nasty comment he left you on your old site a few years ago that did not seem like his character from my experience (assuming it was the same person).
“Most males seemed to be able to suppress their desires for teen girls without too much effort or redirected it towards “college girl” or “just turned 18” erotic material because women magically become sexy on the 18th birthday!”
I was definitely the same as you when I was in my twenties. Nothing mattered more to me than the beauty of teenage girls, and the desire for any kind of contact with them. It was an emotional and physical need and I knew I couldn’t be happy without meeting it, and as I largely didn’t – aside from some friendships with teen girls – I was very miserable for most of the time.
So I suppose it’s not ridiculous to apply a label of ‘ephebophile’ to my 25 year old self, even though I was aware even then that most men were lying hypocrites and would love to bang hot young teens, even if they might not have the intensity of attraction (particularly emotional) as I had.
From a tactical point of view, I still firmly believe it’s a mistake to push the ‘ephebophile’ identity or even recognize it really, as it cuts off most of the male demographic as potential support, pathologizes attraction to teen girls and so on, as me and Steve were discussing in relation to ‘MAPs’.
There are ‘homosexuals’, ‘bisexuals’, and ‘straights’. Is there even a commonly used word for a man who is sexually attracted to both men and women, but prefers men? Most men are attracted to both teenage girls and women above (at least attractive young women in their twenties). In my opinion, if it wasn’t for the brainwashing and taboo, most men would prefer to have sex with 13 – 18 year old teens. If you stripped away the public paedocrisy, they might do so regardless even now. Only 40 years ago and mass-selling newspapers in the UK like ‘the Sport’ were counting down the days until they could show 15 year old girls topless. I doubt if men have changed that much in four decades, despite the feminist brainwashing.
As for me now, if I could ‘design’ my dream girlfriend as one can with an AI girlfriend, I would probably select her age as 17 (but intelligent and on the emotional mature side).
Having said that, both of my oneitises (‘twoitises’?) in my life were 20 and 25 when I (permanently) fell in love with them. I checked out the Instagram of one of them just this week for the first time in a couple of years. She is around 30 now, but she’s still beautiful (at least in her photos) with amazingly slim long legs which she likes to show off. I even had a dream about her last night (although she looked more like her 20 year old self in it).
I could be perfectly happy these days with an attractive 20 year old girlfriend, or even 25 if she was beautiful. I don’t even really ever yearn for a 14 year old these days, just appreciate them as eye candy when I’m out and about.
As regards “dissident”, as soon as I read that name it rang a manic bell inside of my head, lol. Was that the guy who said that if I ever had casual sex with a 16 or 17 year old girl he hoped her father would cripple me? I wonder how he can reconcile 17 year old girls not being mature enough to handle casual sex, with persuading society that it’s ok for men to have relationships with 13 year olds?
@ The Antifeminist Yes Dissident said that it was OK to have a 16 year old as a girlfriend but that it was wrong to treat one as a “sex object” and wished you harm if you were to “sexually objectify” a teen girl…whatever that means This is a far cry from the Dissident I once knew who railed against protectionist attitudes towards teen girls and who thought teen prostitution and soft porn should be legal and had no issue with casual sex or teen fetish sex as long as their was informed consent. Either this was someone else with the same non de guerre or he has really drank the feminist Koolaid over the years.
WRT to the ephebophile label i respect your veiws we are not going to agree on everything. i also fortunately am able to find sexual fullfillment with some adult women mostly professional girlfriends (legal age). My one favourite Professional girlfriend retired and we have been “friends with benefits” ever since she is in her early 40s but looks much younger than that much to my delight! When we met she was 23 but looked about 19.
Sadly one thing that has made it easier to deal with the fact that i can’t be with teen girls is that on average iI find the “Zoomer” and “Generation Alpha” girls to be much less desirable than their Generation X and Millennial predecesors:
A) At least in Canada a significant minority of them walk around with this horrible combination of narcissism mixed with anxiety disorders.
B) A large majority of them appear to have no nurturing qualities and seem unable or unwilling to do any kind of “emotional labour”. Many walk around with pouty faces and never speak in a soft spoken or inviting manner.
C) Watching them play soccer/football they seem to be even more vicious than the boys ther age (a complete reversal from when i was young).
D) A lot of them really do not seem to have much of an interest in sex or dating at all. Something just seems off about a lot of them and not just the teen girls ever since the mid 2010s expecially I find a lot of women have become…different. I have a hard time describing it but it is like their desire for male company (in the intimate sense) has tanked and they have lost a lot if thier feminine and man-pleasing skills. Sometimes when women come near me I almost feel that a rival male is approaching me rather than a female.
All that being said when I come across a sexy, happy, friendly and feminine teen girl showing off her body it makes my day just as much as it always did. When I leave the city and visit small towns I find the women and girls there are a lot nicer and friendlier but unfortunately in small canadian towns you get A LOT more obesity and women aging poorly due to diet and lack of exercise.
Billionaire owner of French telecoms giant ‘Free’ has integerated a free VPN into its service, boasting its ability to get around porn age verification checks, prompting fury from femihags and a left-wing politician who has reported it to the French media regulator.
https://www.connexionfrance.com/news/row-over-porn-access-as-free-adds-vpn-to-french-mobile-contracts/744909
Indeed I’ve noticed if I set my VPN to “France” I now no longer can enter Xhamster. I get the message “French law now requires age verification”.
The most annoying thing I’ve found about all these age verification laws is that now X.com even sometimes blurs posts on Gaza and such like for people outside of the US.
AF, is this generated by your side? Occurs when I try to post a reply.
“Not Acceptable!
An appropriate representation of the requested resource could not be found on this server. This error was generated by Mod_Security.”
Hi Jack, it happened to me the other day when I posted a comment. I will try to look into it later today. I’ve noticed there haven’t been so many comments the last few days, so I hope this isn’t the reason why.
Has anybody else encountered the error message that Jack described, when attempting to post a comment?
I am just testing whether this reply gets through. When the error message popped up, it always did so when I was replying to a particular comment (ie clicking on “reply” first), not when I was adding my own comment at the end of the discussion.
Thanks Jack. It seems to be a security thing on the side of the web host’s server to prevent hacking.
At this point, I don’t know whether Anon69 or Steve haven’t been commenting the last few days because of this problem or not, so I can’t say whether it’s serious enough to contact my webhost over.
@AF-
I have not been able to see a couple of comments I’ve put up lately.
Unless you have blocked them yourself for reasons of blog survival, but I can’t see what was in them to cause this. I’m not trying to second guess you, because I don’t know all the possible issues in running a blog in the UK, just letting you know.
Thanks Anonymous2. I haven’t blocked any comments recently other than the troll from Eivind’s blog. I checked the spam folder yesterday and didn’t see any reader comments.
I just took another look in the spam folder and I found this comment (and approved it) from a few days ago. Is this you using a different name?
https://theantifeminist.com/september-2025-news/comment-page-1/#comment-642850
I don’t recall using a different name and it comes up as Anonymous 2, so I have no idea what’s going on.
It wasn’t there last time I checked, which admittedly was a couple of days ago.
I’ve looked in the spam and trash for the last 7 days comments and all I saw was that one comment. Oh well, at least it means we might have another new commentator!
@AF,
Yes, I have enountered these error messages before. Acutally quite a couple of time over a couple of weeks. I’d say I encountered them like 4-5 times since I have been commenting here.
What I have noticed was that when I encountered them, someone else’s comment was shortly seen after. So I thought not too many comments at once can be processed.
All my comments from the last couple of days have been published eventually.
Thanks Steve. I will investigate further and see if there is a way to stop it without compromising the security from hackers.
It’s a bit of a pain, but I guess before posting a comment, everybody should copy it first just in case.
Fergie dropped from multiple children’s charities as a result of her email to Epstein being made public. She was the patron of a children’s hospice charity. I’m sure she did some great work helping kids dying from cancer, making their last weeks and months a little brighter. Now that will be taken away because of a few teenage whores who gave a billionaire and his friends handjobs and who were angry that he dumped them when they turned 20.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddmr6v0jpzo
14 year old charged after brutally beating an elderly attendant at a pop concert who asked him to sit in the right seat:
https://x.com/DailyLoud/status/1970587829320429755
What gets me is the reactions of the other young people next to them. Just grinning and recording it on their phones, hoping for a few views and likes on TikTok or whatever mindless social media they are on.
This might seem unrelated to our usual concerns, but I don’t see how anybody could be surprised that young people can have this callousness and hate for older people when you raise them in paedohysteria and force generational apartheid upon them.
According to a Tweet I’ve just seen: “The new Florida law that allows for the DEATH PENALTY for adults who rape children under the age of 12 is now in effect.
Total Pedo Death”
To which somebody claiming to be a Christian has replied “I find this solution quite barbaric and absolutely discrepant with the scriptures and what our Lord and Savior prescribed in these very cases.
It’s not even ecological, you don’t think about the over fishing and the depletion of our seas, let’s give something back instead!”
And an image with the acronym M.A.P and the words “Millstone Attached Paedophile”.
https://x.com/LagrimaChristi/status/1970748045383160302
https://x.com/LagrimaChristi/status/1970748045383160302/photo/1
Pretty much illustrates the points we just discussed.
From Brian’s blog – it looks like the ‘virtuous paedophiles’ are the biggest paedocrites!
https://www.brianribbon.com/home/virtuous-pedophiles-a-cult-that-needs-to-die
I’m still around, just a bit less active lately.
I liked Brian Ribbon’s comment, and I like his writing in general. “However, in the case of MAPs, our opponents can simply assert they are protecting children from severe harm, and this will be accepted no matter how absurd the premise.” What came to mind was how come this ‘protect the children’ stance works so well on the topic of sex? There is solid evidence that the explosion of the number of vaccines given to children (and maybe even vaccines in general) is extremely harmful including death. Yet there is silence on the topic. The answer is obvious – gigantic money interests are aligned in favor of selling vaccines. I think we also have our answer about age gap and under 18 sex – gigantic money (and government) interests are behind it. As well as the fact that no one really cares about other peoples’ children, but they certainly care about protecting their own sexual interests (the pedocrite men want to get laid and get less shit from their disgusting fat wives, and the women want to keep control of their men and society in general).
#Metoo became the official policy of the Anglosphere. Kicked off by the left and carried to capital punishment by the right.
I agree very much with your take on vaccines and wider issues in the world, especially the Anglosphere. There are huge vested interested in extending childhood and emphasizing age gaps.
Gay sex was decriminalized and people’s attitudes changed even though there was a widespread perception which needed to be overcome, that gays liked underaged males and even little boys. This was more true than they cared to admit but by parroting “anti-paedo” sentiments, mainstream gay groups gained acceptance.
There doesn’t seem to be an equivalent chink in the armour for us, though.
Not sure if this is official, but according to this site, Musk has been named in the latest batch of Epstein files released. Visited the island in 2014: https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/news/press-releases/oversight-democrats-release-third-batch-documents-jeffrey-epstein-estate
What a fu***** paedocrite!!
@AF Looks like you edited your last post a bit. So I will comply, and post “general” topics under the monthly news. The reason I commented under the newest one was to not add to many comments under the old ones. Otherwise it can get a bit “clustered.”
Anyway:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/36845340/andrew-flew-jeffrey-epsteins-jet-massages/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15138071/Prince-Andrew-Jeffrey-Epstein-files-paedophile-jet-Musk.html
Also:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15137011/Montessori-nursery-worker-jailed-attacking-toddlers-cannabis.html
Can all of the sudden 21/22-year-olds be adults? Is there really a difference between toddlers and young women? I thought all women, escpecially young ones, who are still children right, are angels?………………………I hope you get my sarcasm here.
What an evil bitch. If she’d sexually assaulted them too, Eivind would be white knighting for her.
It’s great to see Musk on the Epstein list. Hopefully it will at least shut him up about Epstein or paedophiles from this point on, but I doubt it.
Remember Raymond?
I always enjoy when he lets he true feelings out and says that he wants a young woman because it is the opposite of bottling your feelings up.
And I agree with his oberservation, as I have said many times, that even in the late 2000s and early 2010s it was much easier to express and get with a younger woman, in some cases even underage, but that depended strongly on the country/environment.
https://youtu.be/pl1_vVMAvaU?t=1243 -> Time-stamped. Watch for a couple of minutes.
This guy fucking sucks, I couldn’t listen for more than 30 seconds. So this is where we are now, they ban Heartiste and leave guys like this up instead, as a target of ridicule. It’s exactly the same thing that the feminists did with their movie portraying Eivind in a pathetic light.
This guy is emoting like a woman, and blaming his problems on ‘aging’, which is a womanly concern. Gay as hell. So, he becomes controlled opposition, steering men upset at the young pussy drought away from the real cause, which is institutionalized radical feminism and #metoo culture. And also making men who complain about this appear womanly and unattractive, unless he talks about this later in the video; I’m not sure because it was too abrasive to get through. Well done Raymond!
As I said, I don’t have to agree with everything a person says to highlight some good points. And there are a couple of things I don’t agree with him. For me a man, especially an (older) one that nowadays says that he likes/wants a younger woman is refreshing to see. You have countless men that claim that they only want old(er), experienced women, and if you want a young, thin, hot 20-year-old, you are basically a “pedophile.”
That doesn’t mean I agree with everything Raymond says or how he conducts himself. For example, he has too much of a romantic view of “religious/Christian/blue collar/conservative” life in the past from my point of view. And in someways he is still “bluepilled.”
I like his point that his generation saw girls their own age having relationships with older guys, and now he is an older guy and we’re not allowed or at least have to jump through hoops even to date young women. Or rather, his observation rings true for me.
When I was 15 or 16, there were girls in my class dating guys years older than themselves. One of my crushes at the time was sleeping with a 30 year old man. And that was just dating. They were all going to nightclubs at that age, and it was absolutely the norm at the time for underage girls to go back and have one-night stands with 30 year old and 40 year old men.
We truly are the most unfortunate generation of men. We saw teen girls our own age sleep with older men. Now we are shamed for even thinking about teen girls. And the teen boys of today will probably live in an AI sex utopia when they are our age, in which they can have any kind of sexual fantasy they can imagine fulfilled.
“I like his point that his generation saw girls their own age having relationships with older guys, and now he is an older guy and we’re not allowed or at least have to jump through hoops even to date young women. Or rather, his observation rings true for me.”
That’s why showed this part of the video in the first place.
“When I was 15 or 16, there were girls in my class dating guys years older than themselves. One of my crushes at the time was sleeping with a 30 year old man. And that was just dating. They were all going to nightclubs at that age, and it was absolutely the norm at the time for underage girls to go back and have one-night stands with 30 year old and 40 year old men.”
That’s why I am harping on the culture so much, and how much it allows it, even if the laws are the same. In your case, the UK had already for around a hundred years or so the age of consent at 16. I doubt back then 15- and 16-year-olds were “officially” allowed into clubs. And see despite it what was possible. Nowadays you can still date a 16-year-old as a 30- or 40-year-old, but then all hell breaks loose. Remember the story of Adam Johnson and the 15-year-old he “interacted” with at night club?
In German we have a nice idiom, “Wo kein Kläger, da kein Richter.” It basically means, “No plaintiff, no judge.” Even if the law says otherwise, but if everybody is cool with it, and no one snitches, then go on.
I found another post by a young woman that blew my mind, and once again perfectly describes the age-gap/pedo-hysteria. Unfortunately, she has already deleted it. But I still remember the main gist.
So there is a young woman, “head over heels in love” with her new boyfriend. Everything is perfect, but there is ony big issue — the age gap. She describes how her friends are not approving it, and that such a man is taking advantage of her. Her parents are also very skeptical, and don’t really like it. And the woman in question buys it. She says how vulnerable she is, how he can be this master manipulator just because of his age etc. Whatever this means. I hear that so much, it sounds like mumbo jumbo. So basically she let others successfully destroy her relationship. The woman is 18. So how old was the “evil bad master manipulator man that takes adavantage of little girls”?………..drum roll…….23.
Our culture causes so much trouble and strain for such little, basically non-existent age gaps now. In the past I showed you examples of parents that were glad and happy that their 17-year-old daughter is not even contemplating a 19-year-old boyfriend. I compared this insanity to the notion of witchcraft, and being accused of it.
Absolutely right Steve! Being an older man in a relationship with a younger woman turns you the puppet master ventriloquist. A man can suddenly wake up this morning and find himself with Svengali superpowers, if the woman he is dating with is much younger than him.
“That’s why I am harping on the culture so much, and how much it allows it, even if the laws are the same.”
Correct. And yes, I remember right up until the ’00s you would commonly see even 13 year old girls in nightclubs. As far as I know, it was the same in Europe. I remember in 2001 I spent a few weeks in Salzburg, Austria, and there was one nightclub there that was pretty packed with 14-17 year olds – and it was an adult nightclub. In the 90s, I would often see girls that age in sex shops. In fact, one time I was in a Hamburg sex shop, and the girl serving at the counter could have been no more than 16. But I guess back then Germany/Austria still had that 14-17 distinction rather than treating all U18s as children.
But lest we get drawn into the stupidity of the Berge, it’s important not to think that it is ‘culture’ is determining this independently, like some unknowable metaphysical force that Eivind believes in and calls ‘cultural drift’.
There’s no doubt laws do determine culture. For example, why is it taboo now to date 16 and 17 year olds in the UK, despite it still being legal, and hell, despite 16 year olds now allowed to vote? Well, one major reason was the age for ‘child’ porn being raised from 16 to 18 in the early 2000s. And that itself was inevitable after the femihags had successfully lobbied the United Nations to mandate that globally in the ‘Convention on the Rights of the Femihags, oh sorry, I mean Children’ in 1988.
I remember going to a pub in Budapest at 14 and drinking at the bar. Everyone was cool. That was the first time I confirmed that life was indeed far more free outside Gay USA.
Liam Gallagher of Oasis supports his brother accused of rape:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15140809/Liam-Gallagher-dedicates-song-rape-charge-brother-Paul-Oasis-reunion-farewell-UK-suggests-Britpop-band-return-year.html
I’m trying once again to share a post I wrote in response to the discussion above.
Your security system seems not to like me…
https://www.brianribbon.com/short-takes/maps-and-male-sexualism
Thanks Brian, I will take a good look at your article. Sorry about the problems with commenting. Did you get an “unacceptable” message like others have occasionally been seeing?
Great article. It’s hard to believe saying a 14 year old pubescent girl is hot now makes you a “radical MRA”. AF is right that we are part of a very sexually unfortunate generation of men, it’s hilarious in its irony. That’s life!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnlPtaPxXfc
Brian might be interested to know that it wasn’t always the case that the age of consent and paedohysteria were considered to be ‘radical’ or fringe men’s rights.
For example, the first MRA in the late 19th and early 20th century was Ernest Belfort Bax and he was highly criticial of the suffragettes trying to raise the age of consent from 12/13 to 21.
And one of the first ‘modern’ MRA books was ‘Not Guilty: In Defence of Men’ by David Thomas published in 1993. He argued that the demonization of men for having sex with teens is misandry, and even pointed to a famous German study which found that young teens were more harmed by the whole judicial process than the act of underage sex. As it happens, he identifies as a woman now – presumably given up fight and decided to literally join the other side.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6544051-not-guilty
And dear departed Angry Harry of course didn’t hold back in arguing against putting men in prison for looking at child porn.
https://angryharry.com/es_chris_langham.htm
It was mostly American conservative puritanism (the likes of Paul Elam and the honey badgers, and the moderator of r/mensrights) that drowned out the mainly British and European voices trying to keep these issues as men’s rights.
It occurs to me that it was US conservatism that pushed us out of men’s rights, and it was US identity politics that created the MAP movement that further squeezed us out of the discourse.
At time-stamp 2:01 porn cutie Elsa Jean says she’s dating a man 50 year her senior:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhj41IgQPNI
There are actually a lot of such age-positive testimonies out there. How can that be in the context of men being called pedos if they show interest in women 5 years their junior? Of course what Elsa Jean doesn’t say is that the man she’s dating is wealthy. But it doesn’t matter. Even if she’s dating him for the money, she shouldn’t be dating a pedophile.
Jack, with Elsa Jean you showed a very good example here. Now that she is a little older herself, and had some plastic surgery done, she looks more her age now. When she was beginning to perfom in porn, she definitely could have passed for a 15/16-year-old. And lots of people were jerking off to her of all ages. Just another example for the hypocrisy.
“How can that be in the context of men being called pedos if they show interest in women 5 years their junior?”
I think the reason for this is because she is a known porn star. I bet that if she was a normal unkown woman, and an older man would be dating her when she was in her late teens/early twenties, he would get all the wrath from people, including all the insults.
As a pornstar she has more “power”, or is at least attributed to her from feminists etc. I also assume there is the envy aspect. As a porn star she is fucking strange men on camera for every one to see and jerk off. In a way she is sharing herself to the world. Everyone is getting “access” in some way. And all those who jerk off to her would be hypocrites/pedocrites if they start complaining.
But if she was a normal unkown woman, she would only give it to one “older dirty pervert” man. And then the envy may go even higher. Who knows. I may be wrong with the last part.
Nice link, thanks for the positivity Jack. Even if she’s dating for the money, she could also be dating for 100 other signs of dominance as well (such as the emotional maturity aspect she mentions).
Age cuck alert!
https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGapRelationship/comments/1nsmrue/m57_and_f27_celebrating_4_years_of_marriage/
So, a 57-year-old man is married to a 27-year-old woman. So far so good, right? He posted it in one of the age-gap subreddits which are more neutral or positive towards age-gap relationships.
But some users went through his post history and found out that he did one the “most disgusting things” a man, especially a man his age can do. He complimented a 14-year-old.
https://old.reddit.com/r/looks/comments/1npl964/how_do_i_look_as_14f/ngjrwuk/?context=3
And yes, just based on that one picture she is attractive. Will be fun to see how the original thread will play out, and if they chase him off for being a “dirty nonce/pedo/predator/groomer.”
Do you challenge the age cucks and hags in the comments section in that subreddit yourself Steve?
Personally, I’d avoid Reddit for the sake of your mental health. Surely there’s other places online to discuss age gap relationship which aren’t full of age cucks, paedocrites, and jealous women?
The ’14 year old girl’ looks very nice, but has an extremely suspcious account. Looking at her comments history (asking men to DM her, posting that she is 16 in another subreddit) I would say there is a high likelihood ‘she’ is an undercover police officer or vigilante.
No, I do not post on reddit at all. But I visit a couple of subreddits among other sites to make my “research” outside the real world.
“Personally, I’d avoid Reddit for the sake of your mental health. Surely there’s other places online to discuss age gap relationship which aren’t full of age cucks, paedocrites, and jealous women?”
Where we can be this honest? I don’t think so. Your site, Eivind’s blog, incels.is are the only places I can think of where you can be this honest (that I personally know of). And yes, you are definitely right. Reading posts from reddit age cucks is very exhausting.
“The ’14 year old girl’ looks very nice, but has an extremely suspcious account. Looking at her comments history (asking men to DM her, posting that she is 16 in another subreddit) I would say there is a high likelihood ‘she’ is an undercover police officer or vigilante.”
Agree, but for me that wasn’t important. The older man in question thought she was one. And he complimented her. And all the age cucks used this as ammo to denounce him, but it also shows once again that younger teen women can be attractive, even for older man. That was important for me to show.
As of now, the man in question has reacted to it, and deleted his original message. You can no longer view it. But so have been the accusations. They have been deleted as well.
I would stick to incels.is
There’s work to be done there anyway countering the agecucks, it seems like the ratio is 50/50 agecuck to normal person.
I agree. Nothing more important than combatting the age cucks and paedocrites there. If the incels are lost, there’s not much hope at all.
“Agree, but for me that wasn’t important. The older man in question thought she was one. And he complimented her.”
I wasn’t belittling your point Steve, just pointing out how common these ‘decoy’ profiles are on Reddit and elsewhere.
“I wasn’t belittling your point Steve, just pointing out how common these ‘decoy’ profiles are on Reddit and elsewhere.”
The problem with text communication. I never interpreted your reply as “angry,” criticizing, or belittling. All good…
Macron’s tranny wife is presenting evidence that she’s a woman to a court in her attempt to sue a right-wing influencer.
Isn’t it open knowledge and accepted that she was banging Macron when he was a 15 year old schoolboy in her class?
Given what society would do to her if she was a man who had banged a 15 year old female student, how does she have any reputation to defend?
I guess that’s why she’s so eager to prove that she is a woman – to preserve her pussy pass.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg3llj5nxdo
“Leaked Meta AI docs reveal how the chatbot is instructed to respond to child sexual abuse prompts”
https://www.moneycontrol.com/technology/leaked-meta-ai-docs-reveal-how-the-chatbot-is-instructed-to-respond-to-child-sexual-abuse-prompts-article-13586166.html
“This extra scrutiny followed a troubling revelation in August, when Reuters reported that earlier Meta guidelines mistakenly allowed chatbots to “engage a child in romantic or sensual conversations.” Meta later admitted the language was an error and said it had been removed. The new leaked guidelines seem designed to leave no room for confusion.
According to the updated rules, AI chatbots must refuse any request that involves sexualizing children, depicting relationships between children and adults, or offering instructions to access child sexual abuse material. Even seemingly innocent roleplay where the AI pretends to be under 18 is strictly forbidden.
That doesn’t mean chatbots are completely banned from discussing the topic. The rules allow AI to provide educational information about grooming, child abuse, or exploitation—so long as the response is factual and not graphic. For example, a chatbot can explain how predators operate or talk about abuse in an academic context, but it cannot describe a scene or give step-by-step instructions.
There are also carefully drawn exceptions: non-sexual romance in the form of literature is permitted (think a “Romeo and Juliet”-style narrative), as long as the AI isn’t roleplaying as part of the story. Advice to minors, like tips for asking someone to prom, is allowed—so long as it doesn’t cross into intimate or physical territory.
Meta spokesperson Andy Stone defended the company’s approach, saying the policies make clear that sexualizing children is prohibited, and that further guardrails exist to protect younger users.”
We need to be attacking the whole ‘minor’ concept, not validating it like the MAPs are.
At the very least, it should be lowered to 16 in countries in which the voting age has been lowered to that age.
“Nonce” punished via crossbow by masked vigilantes in Liverpool (GRAPHIC).
https://x.com/SaltOfTheNorth/status/1944849977139966362
@AF
I thought this would fit. Your opinion as a Brit yourself?
https://incels.is/threads/britfags-are-the-biggest-agecucks.706118/
Possibly, but the Netherlands isn’t far behind, if it is at all. And it’s hard to say Brits are any worse really than Americans. Especially since it was largely from America that the magical age of 18 was shifted over across the Atlantic.
If you look at US vs British politics, the latter hasn’t quite reached the stage of each side constantly accusing each other of being paedophiles.
Then again, I haven’t heard of any anti-paedo riots in the US, although the whole ‘pred hunter’ thing started there.
By the way, any more background information about the nonce hunt with a crossbow you just shared?
I was also looking for specific British point of views. So I only searched for “nonce” as it is only really used in Britain. That’s what I found in a quick search.
https://incels.is/threads/story-i-got-called-a-nonce-by-some-manlet-roidfag-and-a-tallfag-and-they-ran-away-like-pussies-when-i-wanted-to-fight-them.750421/
https://incels.is/threads/a-thread-on-nonce-hunting-vigilante-groups-long-read.268451/
https://incels.is/threads/kids-in-my-town-keep-shouting-pedo-and-nonce-at-me-and-i-really-dont-know-what-to-do.721389/
https://incels.is/threads/why-are-the-british-and-the-americans-the-biggest-agecucks.381068/ -> There is also a link to the Adam Johnson case.
There is no limit for being called a pedo it seems:
https://incels.is/threads/agecucks-shes-just-32-you-sick-fuck-pedo-nonce.679548/
Kazer shared some news about the Youtuber “Destiny” texting “minors” recently.
And here was my reply:
“Correct if I am wrong. Wasn’t Destiny an age cuck himself in the past? I recall he was critical of older men interested in younger women. If that is the case….the irony.”
I just found one of his pedocrite videos by accident:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUhXNzy1JZg
From here: https://incels.is/threads/3-of-men-are-pedophiles-16-of-men-are-hebephiles-82-of-men-are-ephebophiles-teleiophiles-study-shows.150404/
This thread is quite old. Look for how long these topics were already discussed. The oldest go back to 2017 or 2018.
Andrew Tate cleared of charges in the UK: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15145667/Andrew-Tate-not-face-criminal-charges-sex-abuse.html