“Those who control the past, control the future”. A quote from George Orwell’s 1984, a dystopian novel which has come true in nearly every way, except that it is ‘Big Sister’, in the form of feminism, that is chiefly oppressing us. It is feminism, the women’s sexual trade union, that is airbrushing the past in order to more firmly impress their twisted anti-sex values onto the present, and ensure that they persist far into the future.
In 1984, one of the key passages involves Winston holding in his hands an old newspaper clipping that contradicted the official narrative of the Party. It showed three former high-ranking individuals, who had been denounced for treason against the Party, in a different location all-together on the day of the supposed conspiracy and act of treason. It was important to Winston because he saw it as evidence of his own sanity and of the lies of the Party. As he held that piece of newspaper in his hand, he knew that the past still existed as something real and different to the version put forward by the Party. But as soon as it had been consigned to the memory hole, the past, in a sense, had ceased to exist. Or at least it had become a blank slate, on which the Party could impose their own false narratives upon.
Sometimes, I feel the same way when I come across a newspaper clipping that shows how different the past was to the present world. Feminists want us to believe that today’s anti-male sexuality values are something that has always been part of life in the West, even if to a lesser degree. They fear the truth being exposed that attitudes were so vastly different, and could be so again. On this page we can help to preserve the truth about the past, and avoid letting it be thrown into the feminist “memory hole”. As for Winston, we will do this primarily for our own sanity, but it will also be a little pushback against the cultural amnesia that feminists appear to have succeeded in creating. I will add to it over time, and readers are welcome to add their contributions and ‘finds’ in the comments section too.
Carry On Christmas 1973 – “She’s Only 13”
Brooke Shields
Olivia d’Abo
“SHE has that fatal combination—a look of wide-eyed innocence and a sizzling, sensual body to match the best. At 16, Olivia D’Abo has bowled over the movie men to take the film world by storm. Daughter of Manfred Mann pop idol Mike D’Abo, Olivia was just 14 when she was discovered on a California beach by one of John Derek’s talent spotters, John, husband of Bo and a renowned connoisseur of women, immediately gave her a steamy bath scene in Bolero, Since then she has made three films, including a star- ring role in Flying. Olivia, who lives in California, spent four months in Spain making Bolero. And mum—top 60s model Maggie Londan—went too. Olivia said: ‘Everyone had ‘warned me about John, but he was As for that sexy bath scene. “It was innocent and cute,” said the young star. “Bolero was a dream debut, Then all the other good offers started coming in.’ ”
Agree. Keep more saner times alive by archiving them for everyone to see. Not only for older people to remind them how life was before the hysteria and how they changed, but especially for younger people who hadn’t been born yet, thus not even witnessed it.
That’s why I mentioned many media examples (movies, TV, music, literature) in my earlier posts during the summer to show how much saner it was. Right now we are in sexual dark ages. Will we witness a renaissance? I hope so.
Thanks Steve. Yes, you posted some good links, we should post them under this article too. As for a sexual renaissance, we would have no hope of seeing it if it weren’t for the fact that we are about to witness some of the most turbulent times in history. Just for example, with AI. Either it’s a massive bubble which will wreck the economy, or we’re about to achieve AGI and then ASI (and replace all jobs etc.). In either case, society is in for massive upheavals, and almost certainly in the next five years.
Anon69 was talking about the difficulties of preserving mental health and hope in these times. I think a good idea would be to create an article on that topic too, so we can all contribute and share tips in the comments section.
If you look at the list of Miss USA winners back then, they were usually 17 or 18 maximum too (then the STU had a minimum age introduced).
That’s right, in 1937 alone, the winner Bette Cooper was 17, the runners up Alice Emerick 17, Ruth Covington 15, Irmigard Dietel 16, and Phyllis Randall 20 was the old bag outlier.
https://www.psu.edu/news/story/testimony-internet-child-pornography
Male feminist professor Philip Jenkins provides us with interesting insights from 20 years ago in his testimony to US Congress on “child porn”. The cuck casually mentions in mid 1970’s USA, an underage magazine contained 30 pictures and was tolerantly sold in stores for 10 bucks. He says that the Netherlands sold underage magazines legally and publicly into the 1980’s, and lax EU attitudes continued into the 1990’s.
Men did not care about showing their faces on self-made underage porn in Latin America or S.E. Asia because their actions were legal there, although the feminist gloats that it’s more dangerous for them in 2006 due to law changes. He laments that in the early 2000’s, one could accumulate thousands of high quality underage porn for free, proving AF’s point that technology which increases the ease of access to young girls threatens the STU and forces feminists into action, similar to what we’re seeing with AI in 2025.
He admits that tens of thousands of daily users of underage porn websites in 2006 is only a “modest estimate.” He describes the majority demographic as “normal” males from teens to adults 55+ and from all walks of life, internationally. He focuses in on males aged 30-50 as being particularly active. The feminist describes the normal cultural climate incredibly only twenty years ago from today: “Even if technically criminal, misdeeds on computers are likely to be viewed by many as pranks rather than heinous offenses.” The feminist interviewed random US citizens and found 1/3 thought it was legal to download underage porn. The feminist laments that the internet is a safe place to get underage porn as opposed to stores where men would be ashamed to be seen. Men also stood up for each other against vigilantes; when a female ISP owner attempted to remove an underage website, hackers instead launched “a hacking attack that shut down her site.”
And the feminist includes some great comments from the 2006 internet which include warnings about feminist Western governments paying lower-income countries to ensnare Western citizens, a trend that has only increased throughout the years.
Imagine how warped and damaged the brains of these feminists are. They see a trend of millions of men enjoying something sexual, men they themselves call “normal” from all ages and all walks of life, and the feminists’ first reaction is that these millions of men must be criminalized and ruined. Meanwhile, millions of girls and women enjoying satanic bestiality rape porn are celebrated and encouraged.
Thanks Anon69. Yes, it was certainly a different world back in the early days of the Internet. One thing that was different legally was that even in the UK the minimum age for porn was 16 until the 1990s (although selling any ‘hardcore porn’ was pretty much legally a grey area). That’s why you had topless girls on Page 3 in tabloids. Virtually every day, millions of British families wooud start the day by looking at a gorgeous 16 year old’s big ripe boobies in the Sun or Daily Mirror over their breakfast.
And it was quite easy to get hardcore VHS videos from Europe featuring 16 and 17 year old girls. I watched dozens before it became illegal and I had to throw out my collection, mainly Channel Seventeen, which was a Dutch porn studio and one of the biggest in Europe. There was absolutely no difference between 16/17 year old pornstars and 18-25, except perhaps the 16 and 17 year old girls seemed to visibly be enjoying it and getting genuinely turned on more. And of course, they had better bodies and fresher faces.
The Internet was a huge harbringer of change. As the article you posted points out, suddenly the difference in laws and attitudes between Europe/the world, and the USA became a problem and a huge threat to American feminists and the SMV of American women.
“proving AF’s point that technology which increases the ease of access to young girls threatens the STU and forces feminists into action, similar to what we’re seeing with AI in 2025”
Yes, and I’m not sure how anybody can doubt it at this stage. As for the magical notion of “cultural drift”, it’s directly contradicted by the history of the Internet (and the article). It wasn’t men complaining about teen porn being everywhere on the early Internet. It was feminists, and if they hadn’t “stepped in”, it would probably have become pretty normalized and few would think anything of it (especially in Europe). It was feminists who turned society the other way. Just as they did in the Victorian era. when few men were complaining about London being full of 15 year old prostitutes lining the streets, until the feminist banshees of the Social Purity Movement (and their tool William Stead) started screeching.
And William Stead was a typical male feminist grifting liar, just like the thousands we see today on the internet.
He paid to have a 13 year old girl drugged and abducted by brothel staff, then fabricated a moral outrage story that the 13 year old girl was raped, which resulted in the UK raising the age of consent from 13 to 16. Hilariously, he was arrested and convicted for the abduction when the government found out what he did, but the age of consent was not returned back to 13.
Here’s a well-balanced review of a book covering Stead the liar from 1999 in the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/1999/oct/16/books.guardianreview
Thanks Anon69, I somehow wasn’t aware of that, or I had forgotten it. I’ll probably order that book. I remmeber reading that he was a passenger on the Titanic and thus died a mangina servant of women, just as he had lived. Oddly enough, the grandfather of David ‘Fatroll’ Futrelle also died on the Titanic.
Contemporary Culture:
Beastie Boys – The New Style
“If I played guitar, I’d be Jimmy Page, the girlies I like are underage”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJPaA1hqozQ
Anthony Kiedis Interview
Q: Do you guys really like Catholic School Girls?
A: We just fuck them to pieces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGtteHXYHUY
In 1989, the news actually discussed a 16 year old high school girl’s plot to extort Rob Lowe for $2 million over their sex tape:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOG8Vfu-zZ4
At 2:33, you can hear the live Beastie Boys scream the lyrics “If I played guitar, I’d be Jimmy Page, the girlies I like are underage” while the entire stadium sings along in 1987! Unreal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZ5sSi2gQPQ
One of the most important details of recent British popular culture that must be preserved before it goes in the memory hole is the Sunday Sport tabloid, and the fact that it boosted its circulation massively among the white Chavs by showing 15 year old girls in bikinis, whilst counting down the days until they could legally show their breasts on their 16th birthdays.
They did this for a few 15 year old girls, the most famous being Lindsey Dawn McKenzie and Hannah Claydon.
Here is a Sunday Sport cover from 2011, during the Savile hysteria. It juxtaposes a headline about Savile having sex with corpses and a photo of Claydon in a bikini. She would have been 25 then, but they were showing the same sexy pics of her in a bikini when she was 15 just 10 years before.
https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/weekend-sunday-sport-newspaper-27th-1775561028
“The Sunday Sport capitalised on the popularity of The Sun’s Page 3 feature by making sexualised content its primary focus. Topless glamour models were printed across multiple pages and a “nipple count” was published to highlight how many exposed breasts the issue featured.[8] The tabloid courted controversy by featuring 15-year-old aspiring glamour models in scantily clad poses, counting down the days until it could legally show them topless on their 16th birthdays, as it did with Linsey Dawn McKenzie and Hannah Claydon,[9] among others.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunday_Sport
And no, it was not “angry moms and pops” who put a stop to this. British “moms and pops” thought nothing of leering at bikini pics of 15 year old girls and topless photos of 16 year olds over breakfast with their families.
It was the feminist Labour MP Clair Short (and the NSPCC lobbied for the minimum age to be raised to 18).
Fantastic history here.
Amazing little clip-https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZKOusS6pEry0/ . The title is
“Megyn Kelly Says Epstein Was Not a Pedophile Since He Liked 15-Year-Old Girls, Not 8-Year-Olds”.
Newsweek and other MSM sources are reporting this, which means it’s not a deepfake unless the original clip released by Fox News is. And even if it were, it wouldn’t matter since its significance comes from the fact that it’s come an established, mainstream news outlet.
To be clear, she’s quoting an anonymous source and she still says Epstein’s actions were “disgusting”. However, IMHO her disclaimer is relatively unimportant. She speaks in such a way as to more-or-less state that she agrees with her source that Epstein wasn’t a paedo for going after teenage girls, and that’s the main thing.
If you asked me when someone as Yankee Doodle Paedocrite mainstream as Megyn Kelly would be making this point. I’d have said 1-2 years from now maybe, but here it is. Wow.
That’s very encouraging (and surprising)!
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/14/business/video/megyn-kelly-questions-epstein-pedophile-digvid
If a man said it, they would have been cancelled immediately most likely. We need more women to be saying this stuff before it will become remotely acceptable for a man to risk saying it in public.
Meanwhile, Trump is going after one of the most fervent anti-Epstein femiservatives: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9wv4dx05q5o
Fuck horse face large marge! Replace her with Megyn Kelly!
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=19950207&id=gU5OAAAAIBAJ&pg=2408,2396348
Large Marge pretends like Georgia never had its age of consent at 14 until 1995.
How 17 year old Yvette Mimieux played opposite Rod Taylor in ‘The Time Machine’ (1960).
https://youtu.be/F2dV14vDCcY&t=298
In 1995, Glenn Harris (33) eloped with his student Christina Rosado (15). He started dating her when she was 14. When he returned to NYC, Harris received 3 years of probation and no jail time. The FBI even got involved and did not bring federal charges, unlike today due to the 2003 PROTECT Act “sex trafficking” feminist laws, and the “Project Safe Childhood” feminist persecution campaign that began in 2006.
Glenn Harris had notable alt-left attorneys Kunstler and Kuby defending him. Investigators found the girl was not abducted by force and wanted to be with Harris. “Harris pleaded guilty to a count of parental interference, which is a felony. Justice Antonio Brandvine sentenced him to three years probation and ruled that he and Rosado could see each other again. Prosecutors said Harris and Rosado ignored a previous order barring the two from seeing each other.”
And here is the key – feminist laws preventing the examination of “rape victims” had not been passed yet, so the man would not be defenseless when the government lied and slandered him in court, like he is today. “Assistant District Attorney Lisa Friel described the plea bargain would be better for all parties involved. ‘Christina would have been asked about sexual abuse by her father and physical abuse by her mother,’ Friel said. ‘These allegations would have played a role in any trial (and) a trial would have been unfair to her. This is the best the public justice system can do under the circumstance.'”
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1995/07/25/No-jail-for-teacher-who-fled-with-teen/7416806644800/
https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1995/05/17/teacher-accused-of-kidnapping-student/
https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/14/nyregion/fbi-seeks-a-couple-on-the-run.html
https://saleintothe90s.wordpress.com/2017/03/21/297-glenn-harris-1995/
I was reading the age-gap subreddit, and found some intersting user who posted a good thread in another subreddit. I assume this was posted by a man, and he created a thread called “Age Gap Hysteria Is A Cult.”
https://old.reddit.com/r/sixwordstories/comments/1oto0bx/age_gap_hysteria_is_a_cult/
I am not familiar with that subreddit, but apparently you can only have a maximum of six words for the OP. His statements are found in the comments below. So, to save you some time, I will also link to his account so you can quickly see what he has written. He wrote about eight replies pertaining this topic.
https://old.reddit.com/user/CGSloger
It looks like the average user of this subreddit is not too fond of what he has to say.
He posted a lot; therefore I won’t quote his text in its entirety directly. I have only skimmed his texts so far, but I enjoyed it from what I have read. Maybe I will point out/highlight some parts in another reply.
I like that more and more people use the word “hysteria” for what we are encountering.
This is his post (it was not him who said that age gap hysteria for minors is valid) :
“”People like to be judgmental about things that are still socially unacceptable. They used to freak out about race and sexual orientation differences, but they can’t do that anymore.”
Yes. The fact that the great majority of the dominant culture believes something is unacceptable in huge numbers doesn’t make it correct in an intrinsic sense. It only makes it “right” in a by default manner. Everyone who is well-versed in progressive politics are well aware that the “consensus believes this is unacceptable” excuse has been used against other groups in the past to justify their repression, and it has repeatedly proven far more the result of cultural manipulation rather than anything to do with real validity.
People used to freak out over black men who wanted to be with white women. We can make other comparisons. Black men who protested this were once accused of only wanting relationships with white women similar to how I’m being accused of only wanting to be with a younger person for posting this thread.
People could accuse older people who talk out against age gap hysteria of being only, or primarily, concerned with only wanting to be with younger partners, and having no concern for younger people beyond that. Except that it’s an old saw tactic that is no different from accusing gay people of only being concerned with having unhindered romantic encounters with each other in bath houses and little or nothing else when fighting for gay liberation, rather than having any interest in the broader issues of society. Such accusations were common in the past, but you no longer see people who insist that gay people should refrain from having homosexual romantic relationships with each other being hailed by the public. This is because for the most part vanilla homosexuality has moved beyond the degree of widespread emotional sensitivity that it once elicited. It has now been proven that society wasn’t destroyed by allowing gay people to pursue relationships that are natural to them, but have a fully developed conscience and capacity to care for society in general on a wide and broad basis apart from the interests of gays alone. They have proven capable of showing genuine concern and respect for their same sex partners, and that their freedom benefits society on a wide basis.
The great majority of the dominant white population in the West believed that black people were inherently less intelligent than white people, to the point of being unable to learn to read and write, and thus deserved to be chattel slaves or prevented from becoming doctors, lawyers, scientists, educators, etc. The fact that black people were not allowed to try and learn how to read and write in the first place helped bolster that once common belief, which was a major case of dirty pool on the part of the majority. Now we know black people are just as intelligent as white people. Today society believes similar things about the intelligence of younger people. But if we gave younger people a chance to prove themselves it is likely that would also prove society is wrong about their perceived intelligence.
People who are judgmental of age gaps need to understand that the older people in age gap relationships are actual human beings like everyone else. So to those following this discussion, I would appreciate if a little respect is shown. Because if it turns out that the mainstream public opinion is wrong, then anyone who didn’t will have contributed to harming many people because of an inability to consider they could have been wrong. There are millions of people who only do well in age gap relationships and many younger people’s freedom are affected by the public’s paranoia of age gaps.
Someone could argue that the few who talk out against age gap hysteria are probably wrong. But it’s not about the tiniest percentage of people buying this. Rather, it’s about all but the tiniest percentage of people being afraid to take on this subject in the first place, far less of them still willing to do it totally objectively.
Considering the fact most people in eras past, and not too far in the past at that, used to accept or believe things that were demonstrably untrue simply because it appealed to them on some deep emotional level means that we shouldn’t find it so galling that we do not always give the benefit of the doubt to consensus opinion. This is especially when said opinion lacks logic, lacks any substantive evidence, and closely resembles similar types of beliefs that were popular in the past but since proven wrong. And I want to make it abundantly clear that it’s nearly certain that the majority are wrong about the social acceptability of age gaps at this point since the available evidence makes it clear that the hysteria has just about peaked, if not peaked already, and is now a bit past its heyday.”
And Steve quoted this, which appears to be from another commentator:
“The current moral panic in question has lasted for about 35 years now. As a cursory examination of moral panics in the past will show, 35 years is not an extremely long period of time for such a hysteria to last from a historical perspective. It’s viewed as long by some people because that span of time is a significant portion of the individual human life span. However, it’s but a tiny portion of time in regards to the span of human history in general.”
@AF
This is not all, scroll below. He has seven more replies (if I counted correctly).
“The current moral panic in question has lasted for about 35 years now. As a cursory examination of moral panics in the past will show, 35 years is not an extremely long period of time for such a hysteria to last from a historical perspective. It’s viewed as long by some people because that span of time is a significant portion of the individual human life span. However, it’s but a tiny portion of time in regards to the span of human history in general.”
This quote is from the same commentator. I noticed you removed our back and forth, but I understand it since it was because whether it fits your particular post and headline or not.
Let’s try to keep this article/thread just for highlighting evidence and examples that the past was different. We pretty much discuss why it is different today under every other article.
Finally!
Something from sphere of old music videos came to my mind…
Do you know Jane’s Birkin song/music video Love fifteen (1990)… I suppose they wouldn’t make such music video nowadays…
Still on official YT channel somehow.
Thanks, yes, I’m surprised they still allow that.
Judging from the video and the lyrics, it’s about a middle-aged woman looking on jealously (or ‘wistfully’) at a pretty 15 year old girl who looks very like her, as she plays tennis. In other words, wishing she could be her attractive 15 year old self again. And it’s a little ambiguous as to whether they are mother and daughter.
https://www.musixmatch.com/lyrics/Jane-Birkin/Love-Fifteen/translation/english
Well, I am surprised too-taking into account that this is platform where music video (Julia) of Chris Rea on his official YT channel is age-restricted. If they find this video worthy of restricting, I am not sure who is not okay here ……
Back to Jane Birkin, song is reminiscence of her young years. as I understand it.
The reference to Dorian Grey in the lyrics is interesting.
I remember seeing the video of “Oh Daddy Oh!” (I think) from the “Lemon Incest” Serge and Charlotte Gainsbourg album on YouTube many years ago, and even then quite amazed that YouTube allowed it.
The French have really turned in an astonishingly short time. People always go on about the British being the most puritan and paedohysteric, but when you consider the relative starting points, countries like France and the Netherlands have been even more transformed by feminist puritanism.
I didn’t knew that “Oh Daddy Oh!” had music video.
Don’t you mean Lemon Incest -song itself?
/watch?v=zahSmGlAAm4
No, it wasn’t Lemon Incest (or Charlotte Forever). It’s definitely ‘stuck in my memory’ as Charlotte is in the bathroom twerking her behind as she is singing. Maybe they intended Oh Daddy Oh to be a single (and made a video for it) but didn’t release it?
Anyway, it’s good to see that Charlotte hasn’t bad mouthed her father like so many women who were alledged to have been ‘exploited’ or ‘sexualized’ when they were teens by their parents. She has even turned the family home into a museum to honour him.
Charlotte for ever- song or film, because
only thing in my memory that resembles your description
But she is not singing there.
Ahh, yes, that was probably it!
My Father the Hero (1994): https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRGwdbxDhX1/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Father_the_Hero_(1994_film)
I like this. Even though it’s not the happiest of endings, it highlights real deviant agency and complete understanding of every bit of the STU by 14 year old girls, mostly undermining right wing christ cucks who love to infantilize their innocent baby angel teenage daughters.
However it could be somehow problematic with present-day Mutaween-style legal norms to present some aspects of liberated times of past.
Yes, I would have loved to get hold of, or see digitalized versions of the Sunday Sport, for example, back when they were publishing topless pics of girls on their 16th birthdays and the like. Not to get off on it, but to highlight as evidence – however, they would be illegal today, and I doubt if they will ever be digitized. At least there are a few places online that clearly describe how they used to countdown the days until they could legally publish topless photos of 15 year old girls. That’s the best we can do in these cases.
BTW, the most important pieces of evidence to preserve, in my view, are the evidence from newspapers like the Daily Mirror and the Daily Record (unfortunately archives of the Sun are still not available it seems) – tabloids that today are among the most paedohysteric and scream about Prince Andrew being a ‘nonce’ for alledged sex with a 16 or 17 year old when they were publishing topless pics of 16 year olds only a few years before, and referring to 12 year olds as sexy and the like. That’s why I include them in the article above itself.
That’s the best we can do in these cases.
And what about censored photography?
All these laws are so vague and selectively enforced(ie. Saló),
that (I would bet)sometimes even lawyers aren’t sure what is OK and what not.
Let’s talk about harems throughout history. First, Genghis Khan-
ChatGPT says:
“While the specific average age of women in Genghis Khan’s personal harem is not explicitly recorded, historical accounts suggest that his primary wife Börte was around 10 years old when their marriage was arranged (and around 16 when they married), and that in general, women entering harems in that era could be very young, with some sources suggesting an average age of 12-13 years in Islamic countries, which might provide a comparable context for the region and period.”
And this EquatorAI article breaks down Islamic culture more generally-
“It is a mistake to think that a harem is a collection of concubines used by the sultan. It is Europeans with their characteristic tendency to rationalism tend to look at the institution with a bunch of beautiful girls in this spirit.
In reality, it was something like a status confettiere, the very possession of which indicates that ‘the kid has come to success’ (or inherited success).”
“On average, their age at the time of entering the harem was 12–13 years.
In Islamic countries in general, everything was simple: if you have a beard, you are already a man, if you start menstruating, you are already a woman. And this approach was formed in pre-Islamic times. The youngest of Prophet Mohammed’s wives was not even 10 years old.”
“And second, there was a tradition in the Middle East of taking a wife ‘to grow up.’ For the first few years she lived in the house of her husband (or his parents) under the supervision of her father-in-law and mother-in-law, and only then she became a full-fledged wife.”
“Another Sultana, Nurbanu, who came from Sicily, entered the harem at the age of 12, while Safiye was only a year or two older than her.
Quite mature was Kösem, who found herself in the harem at the age of 13, at most — at 14. t is not known exactly at what age Turhan entered the harem, but she was not more than 14 years old, but rather 12–13. The youngest (of those about whom there is some little or no intelligible data) was Handan Sultan (originally Elena), who found herself in the harem at the age of 8.”
https://medium.com/@equatorai/at-what-age-did-you-enter-the-harem-and-why-what-was-taught-there-in-the-first-place-e448cd34de38
I’m not quite sure why Florida and other Republicuck states still allow their students to read books about Genghis Khan and Islamic history. According to the law, those books should be banned for teaching about the sexual conduct of historical pedophiles, and the teachers prosecuted. Won’t somebody think of the children!?
Probably not unknown. All these Hamilton’s films are interesting IMO.
Laura (1979)
Not only fact that Dawn Dunlap was 15-16 when it was produced , but also plot is quite interesting.
“Sculptor Paul meets a former great love again after a long time — but is much more impressed by her 15-year-old daughter, Laura, who looks like her mother when Paul was in love with her. Laura likes him very much too, but her jealous mother prevents any further contact. She allows him to make a sculpture of Laura, but only from photos. “
And that soundtrack from Patrick Juvet…..
https://youtu.be/fgy30Cb2XfQ?t=75
Trailer for better description-it’s “clean” don’t worry, however in present-day definition what is “clean”…..maybe if she wore niquab…
RIP David Hamilton. I had a beautiful hardcover edition of his beach photography collection that I must have paid about £40 for (a lot for me back then!). Then I had to throw it out when the UK Labour government decided that his works were ‘indecent’. I remember not long before this, at the height of the “lad’s culture’ in Britain in the 90s, one of the best-selling lad’s magazines featured a front-page article lauding his work and carried an extensive interview with him. Might have been FHM magazine.
https://www.letemps.ch/culture/difference-entre-david-hamilton-autres-photographes-richissimes-cest-lui-un-style?
Interview for Swiss newspaper LeTemps from May 2015, a year before that bitch Flavie and her accomplices drove him to suicide.
Thanks, I enjoyed reading that, sad though to think what happened to him shortly afterwards – at the age 82! Still, at least he had a great life.
Few years ago Olivier Mathieu run wordpress blog “indefensedavidhamilton”. There were many of his works for various magazines , it included even photos of previously mentioned person, so I guess in France (or Italy as he resided also there) it was not considered “indecent”(as he is not feeble-minded for sure).
However that blog is dead, his reason to end it was supposedly disgust with present-day society and also some financial problems.
Lol, I haven’t been looking at the likes or disliked tbh as there didn’t seem to be many on the first couple of days. I can’t tell who a particular like or dislike is from. I wouldn’t worry about it too much, I doubt if it was one of the regular commentators here. I get 30 – 40 visitors a day now and as you can see, there are only a handful of us posting comments.
It might be better if I disable the upvoting feature and think about restoring it when this site is a bit more popular. Although by that time, there will probably be a few haters here too.
TBH, I actually had the idea of the upvoting feature when I saw you ask Eivind about having a recent comments sidebar like mine. I though I’d further differentiate myself from him, lol.
“I wouldn’t worry about it too much, I doubt if it was one of the regular commentators here. I get 30 – 40 visitors a day now and as you can see, there are only a handful of us posting comments.”
Thanks!
It was just curiosity, as I’ve posted other comments that would be more likely to offend someone’s sensibilities than a suggestion for this film.
I remember that everywhere that was Hamilton’s name mentioned, there were many mentals writing hateful comments on his address. (regardless of language)
Sometimes I wonder who sits on the other side of “cable”.
Rating of comments is not bad idea per se (however IMHO in more mainstream environment it could lead to groupthink), but it would be good if voting was tied to identity/e-mail, to prevent multiple votes from same person.
But I don’t know if it is possible.
Also I wonder whether your webpage does support html codes in comment…
I am not a movie guy, especially when it comes to very old ones. However, I came across a movie by chance that might suit this topic, “To Have and Have Not” from 1944.
I spare you the “boring” part of story and concentrate on what is of interest for this space here: the affair/relationship between the protagonists in the movie, and subsequently in reality. While this was back then as well as today “technically” legal, I still post this because I am convinced if you had this movie made today and all the interaction and subsequent real-life relationship, you would get all the insult, slander, anger and threats.
– The male protagonist, Humphrey Bogart, was 44.
– The female protagonist, Lauren Bacall, was 19.
After the movie, they began a relationship, married, and gotten children.
Some clips from that movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9Ay727EYzw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPTm5DWJGK0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW3gRybrkr4
Today she would be called a child who was exploited by this pedophile man that deserves only the harshest justice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Bacall
When you scroll down a bit, you should find a picture of Bacall on a piano with Truman playing it.
“20-year-old Bacall lounges on top of the piano while Vice President Harry S. Truman plays for servicemen at the National Press Club Canteen in Washington, D.C. (February 10, 1945)”
This picture really got my attention. Why? Can you imagine today a young “barely legal” woman (girl in modern view) sitting/laying in such a pose for an old (vice) president where he can inspect her legs or just enjoy the presence of a young attractive woman? And wasn’t there the same situation with Monroe and Kennedy?
I am not an expert on American culture from the 1940s – early 1960s. What baffles me when I listen contemporary MAGA/conservative/right-wing/(white) nationalist people, how degenerate we have become, and we need the good ol’ times back. This might be true for everything that isn’t just simple normal heterosexuality and the attraction to (young) women, and interaction with them in general. However, these are the same people who would have a problem with the above mentioned. When it comes to normal heterosexuality, I’d say we live in stricter and more puritanical times than ever before, and compared to conservative times from the 40s to the early 60s. Nothing new for us in that space, to say the obvious.
If more “conservatism” means, “Well, you have been dating this 18-year-old, or 16/17-year-old for that matter, for a year or two, or you knocked her up, you better get married and take care of her,” I’d rather have this kind of conservatism than, “You disgusting piece of shit pedophile, you talked and approached an 17.999999-year-old? Now you will be beaten to death and analy raped because you committed the worst crime in human history.”
AF, I think one of your blog titles describes it perfectly “Like it or Not, We are the Homosexuals of the 21st Century.”
Some quote from me that came to my mind,
“In a way I feel like we live in this weird amalgamation of modern technology and “progressiveness” combined with medieval concepts of sex, and mumbo jumbo science superstition (“brain developend not done until 25, thus still being a child”), all mixed together.”
P.S. I posted this some months before, but I think LooksMaximus’ analysis comparing present and past social climates focusing on white national white knights fits quite well.
“The Aryan Pigeonhood”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/53Sor4JpqeQH
P.P.S. This video by LooksMaximus illustrates also why I blame men, too. And I commend him for calling them out.
“I am not an expert on American culture from the 1940s – early 1960s. What baffles me when I listen contemporary MAGA/conservative/right-wing/(white) nationalist people, how degenerate we have become, and we need the good ol’ times back. ”
Yes, good ole’ times without all those nonces and other degenerate vermin.
https://assets.newsweek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/2141266-jerry-lee-lewis-wife-myra.jpg
“For the Roman male, the ideal woman would be a buxom 16 year old with ‘skin as white as wax, sparkling eyes, sweet breath, lustrous dark or auburn hair’ – no blondes or redheads – ‘a scented, sensuous, lissom body and a shaved clitoris, glowing like a pearl’. ”
Source: https://www.amazon.com/Lives-Roman-Emperors-NIGEL-CAWTHORNE/dp/076078311X/
Added Carry On Christmas 1973 to the article.
Lori Mattix –
She was 13 when she began having sleeping with rock stars in the 1970’s. She bragged about sex with David Bowie, Jimmy Page, and Mick Jagger. In the linked article below you can see a picture of the innocent baby angel flower who clearly didn’t understand anything about tab A in slot B.
Her final article comments (now as a 60+ year old) are extremely revealing and prove STU theory. “‘I don’t think underage girls should sleep with guys…My perspective is changing as I get older and more cynical…I got to hang out with some of the most amazing, most beautiful, most charismatic men in the world…Am I going to regret this? No.'”
Incredibly, now that she’s an old bag, Mattix doesn’t think hot young teen girls should have her exact same positive experience of receiving sexual attention from older men! Shocker!
https://allthatsinteresting.com/lori-mattix
Jimmy Page – “The younger the better.”
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/V3GhXhtQfI0
I was expecting a lot of paedocritical moralising shit in the comment section, but surprisingly it could be funny sometimes:
He was a biological researcher alright… specifically young female biology.
He also had the makings of a fine chemist!!!
Hahahaha…
I also wonder if it did “cause controversy” at the time? Maybe in the USA, but probably nowhere else. Pop stars banging their teenage groupies was par for the course I’m sure and everybody pretty much accepted it.
Speaking about groupies, I remember that in previous version of TheAF you had some article about this guy:
https://youtu.be/3GhoWZ5qTwI?list=RD3GhoWZ5qTwI
He got into trouble by saying this about Kevin Spacey:
“Speaking in relation to sexual misconduct accusations against Spacey and former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, Morrissey said: “Throughout the history of music and rock ‘n’ roll there have been musicians who have slept with their groupies.
“If you go through history, almost everyone is guilty of sleeping with minors,” he said, while clarifying he had never been in such a situation.
The singer also said: “I hate rape. I hate attacks. I hate sexual situations that are forced on someone.
“But in many cases, one looks at the circumstances and thinks that the person referred to as a victim is merely disappointed,” he said.”
https://www.irishpost.com/entertainment/morrissey-if-you-go-through-history-almost-everyone-is-guilty-of-sleeping-with-minors-140878
However, he later claimed to have been misquoted and I think tried to sue the German magazine.
Do you remember pool photos by Michael Ochs of Arnold Schwarzenegger with Nastassja Kinski(then 15? in bottom part only) from 70’s ?
Governor of California…..ts ts ts..
@MH
I hope you and other new readers go through the “archives” from time to time. I also mentioned Schwarzenegger in September or October.
I am not saying this to get any “glory” for mentioning it before you. Just wanted to highlight that a fact may already be on our radar. Otherwise, we would have to repeat ourselves even more than we already do, or at least I do.
But in that sense, “repetition makes perfect,” right? To keep ourselves sane. I think you mentioned this months ago, AF.
Since text messages can be misleading regarding “vibe” and tone. All good, and this isn’t meant as criticism.
Yes, I see it now https://theantifeminist.com/october-news-2025/comment-page-2/#comment-644027
Absolutely! Exactly same thoughts were going in my head, when I saw those photos first time (few years ago).
Actually, I am not that new here, but I didn’t know that AF have resurrected his blog, as I was having some pause from all of this (psycho-hygiene).
Hammersmith & Shepherds Bush Gazette review of Kubrick’s “Lolita” – Thursday 10 January 1963
It makes clear that in Britain in 1963, 16 year old girls were not children, and neither was it perverse to want to have sex with them.
“LOLITA NYMPHETTES are nicest when they nine to fourteen years old. Vladimir Nabokov says so and he ought know. He wrote . . . ” LOLITA “. ” Lolita.” The story of a middle-aged man’s passion for a sulky, sullen child with inborn sex appeal. M.G.M. Director Stanley Kubrick read the story of an idea of an obsession and tried to film it. He brought James Mason, Peter Sellers and Shelley Winters together and got breathtaking brilliant performances from all of them . . . but he couldn’t get ” Lolita ” into an X film. She was far too young. ”
How did they ever make a film of Lolita ” the Tube posters have shrieked it for months. The truth is they didn’t. Our badly bent but still unbroken moral standards could not have stood the strain.
Kubrick ducked the all-important issue . . . when it came to it he couldn’t film a man and child making love. Sorry, folks ! He just couldn’t. Instead he turned the lolly-licking Lolita of the book into a luscious blonde high school girl played stunningly by sensational sixteen-year-old Sue Lyon. There won’t be a man in the audience who will not, well … well … appreciate the ” star qualities ” of this brilliant newcomer.
After that there’s no real perversion … is there ? Or is there European Professor Humbert, James Mason, arrives in a small American town looking for somewhere to stay. He looks/round a room. He won’t stay. He sees the landlady’Fdaughter. He stays. He is infatuated with Lolita.
To be near her, he marries her mother, Shelley Winters. When her mother runs under a car after a quarrel, he takes lovely young Lol on a coke and candy trip around the country. Humbert (pronounced Umbair . . . he teaches French you see) is jealous of her teenage friends.
He paints her toe-nails. He talks to her for hours on end. All the time, the bizarre love-birds are aware they are being followed. Clare Quilty, Peter Sellers, is out to end their idyllic affair. An old flame of Lolita’s mother, he rescues the girl and she marries a slow-witted workman with a deli aid. Humbert rages. He’s out to kill Quilty.”
@AF, based on your comment,
“Thanks Steve. Yes, you posted some good links, we should post them under this article too. ”
From my comment in mid-July:
I was thinking about music and bands, and how even up to the 90s or so, they were able to publish songs about banging/being with young women even below 18.
Take a look at this song from 1988 by the band Winger. They are a hard rock/hair metal band that saw quite some success in the late 80s and early 90s. In the mid 90s like many other rock/metal bands they faded into obscurity during the grunge wave.
The song is called “Seventeen” by Winger:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBYeqsVpnuQ&list=RDqBYeqsVpnuQ&start_radio=1
This song was one of their most well-known and successful songs. Can you believe releasing such a song today? Your career would have been over before it began. I saw videos were people danced to such video.
There are many search results when you look for this song on Youtube. Look at the comments underneath the one I just shared…Times have truly changed. Look how they harp on the band members that they were way too old (late 20s back then) for being interested in a young woman. And I say that on purpose. A 17-year-old is not a little girl/child anymore. On a side note, this band is from New York as far as I know, and back then and even now the AOC was and still is 17.
Here is the Chorus from that Song:
“She’s only seventeen (seventeen)
Girl, she gives me love like I’ve never seen
She’s only seventeen (seventeen)
Daddy says she’s too young, but she’s old enough for me (seventeen)
She’s everything I need (seventeen)
Daddy says she’s too young, but she’s old enough, old enough for me”
It can’t get clearer than that unless you start using foul language. And women loved it. This band, especially the singer/frontman, was a chick magnet. These women that liked bands and songs like that in the past are now those old mothers or even grandmothers that would call men predator, pedophiles for being interested in young women today.
In general what I noticed is how people from the silent generation, baby boomers and Gen X were doing all these things, and now act holier than thou. On the other side you have retarted people from Gen Y and Z that act like this from the beginning. In a way I feel like we live in this weird amalgamation of modern technology and “progressiveness” combined with medieval concepts of sex, and mumbo jumbo science superstition (“brain developend not done until 25, thus still being a child”), all mixed together.
How can I forget this American classic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RW9lzqU1ey0
(not FG of course)
Unfortunately there is no English version of it.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katja_Bienert
How would I say it……for many of scenes from her very early career, costumers in that film crews had not to struggle with choice of t-shirts or bras .
One of such was even episode of (not only in German-speaking world) well known crime-series Derrick, where she plays an underage girl.
I’m going through 1960s classic films lately. I intend to only watch 60’s movies for the next year, and beginning with 1960, in order to more fully understand that remarkable decade and how social mores evolved during it. Tonight I watched ‘Peeping Tom’ directed by Michael Powell, which I enjoyed (interestingly, it explores the theme of (real and non-sexual) child abuse having devasting consequences for the protaganist and turning him into a psycho – just like Hitchcock’s ‘Psycho’ which was released the same year. Both were the first ever ‘slasher movies’ released months apart). I wasn’t familiar with Michael Powell’s career, so I looked up his Wikipedia page afterwards. Peeping Tom was a bit ahead of its time and received hugely negative reviews which effectively ended his career. But in 1969 he made ‘Age of Consent’ in Australia, which cast James Mason (who starred in Kubrick’s Lolita) as an artist alongside an ‘underage’ model (actually played by 23 year old Helen Mirren in her first role).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Consent_(film)
YouTube trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGZSby00WXs
One of the comments on YouTube: “Wasn’t mason in lolita? was he a paedo or something?”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noce_Blanche
fan video (“clean”) showing aesthetics of the film
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddZfDmWV2qA
Speaking about Vanessa Paradis, here’s some anecdote in highlighted comment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ulay2FvUEd8&lc=UgxaK35ZHsBmanHs3zJ4AaABAg
So thanks to Tradcuck from Formel 1, her music video doesn’t look like this:
The highlighted comment I assume MH is referring to: “Fun fact: What she is wearing in this clip is what she was wearing privately at the time. She (not the greenscreen background) was recorded here for the german pop music show “Formel-Eins” (Formula One). The producer of the show deemed her stage dress as not appropriate given her young age and as she had no other clothes with her and they had no time to go shopping they decided to film her in what she was wearing when she arrived at the studio in Munich.”
And the first reply – “Iv seen a vid of her performing this song dressed in a black mini dress n over the knee boots …it was very inappropriate, she’s just a little girl… so it’s nice the producer here was aware of that fact! Kids need protecting, too many creeps”
The producer was Andreas Thiesmeyer. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0858077/?ref_=ttfc_fcr_4_1
Interestingly, he was the executive producer of the remake of the Wicker Man, which was an awful movie (in its execution) but did have a great idea of turning the ‘pagans’ of the original into man-hating feminists.
Perhaps it was the costume advisor who didn’t want her appearing in anything sexy, in which case it would have been a woman.
Chat GPT
In the case of Vanessa Paradis’s performance of “Joe le Taxi,” Günter Schmitt made the decision to adjust her outfit for the taping, considering her young age and the more mature outfit she had initially planned to wear. The story has become a fun bit of trivia among fans of the song, highlighting just how much of a spontaneous moment it was.
Vanessa Paradis – then and now: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/pM5lKsMt8Z4
Today’s 1960 movie I watched was ‘The Time Machine’. I thoroughly enjoyed it. What struck me was that not only was the actress who played 30 year old Rod Taylor’s love interest only 17, but she was playing in effect an immature child. As in HG Well’s original novel, the ‘Eloi’ literally have the mental age of 8 year olds (I think I remember that in his novel, they are described as even more physically immature than portrayed in the movie too).
And yet in both the novel and even more overtly in the movie, the audience are expected to understand that the male hero can fall in love with the Eloi girl.
I haven’t watched the more recent adaption starring Guy Pearce, but I think I recall that the actress who played the Eloi girl was in her mid-twenties.
The Time Machine (novel and movie) also has relevance in regard to the possibility that the work-free society of the future depicted might come about soon with AI. If ASI comes about and the need for human work ends then I can foresee something like a hippy student 1960s style culture becoming the norm, with people (forever young) lazing around, taking drugs and making free love. I hope so!
Crazy to think that the 1960s are so long ago now. The novel of HG Wells was published in 1895, exactly 65 years before the movie adaptation. And it is now exactly 65 years since the movie adaptation.
I also wonder if HG Wells, who was absolutely a sexual libertarian, was having a dig in the novel at the raising of the age of consent to 16, which happened only ten years previously?
The actress who played the Eloi girl in the 2002 version with Guy Pearce was Samantha Mumba who would have been 18 during filming. I found her quite appealing and loved the age gap relationship. This is definitely not a movie that would be made today and not just for the age gap reason…having a White male come to the rescue of a “vulnerable woman of colour” would probably also anger the PC mob even though her youth, beauty and erotic power gave HER the power over him. Overall I found the movie to be decent and reasonably enjoyable worth a watch but not a blockbuster or anything like
Thanks Highwayman, I will have to watch the Guy Pearce version and compare it to the Rod Taylor one. I don’t know why I never went to see it when it was released as I grew up watching Guy Pearce in the Australian soap ‘Neighbours’ and was a big fan of his (and HG Wells, of course!).
The Godfather from 1972. I assume most of you are somewhat familiar with the movie.
Does the movie promote pedophilia? Of course not.
Al Pacinos’s character Michael Corleone flees to Sicily during the movie from the US. There he meets a local woman Apollonia Vitelli. He meets her, gets to know her, and eventually they get married. How old were they? Michael Corleone was born in 1920. Apollonia Vitelli was born in 1931. When do they meet? Michael fleed to Sicily in 1947. That means Michael was around 27 whereas Apollonia was around 16. Depending when filming was and concluded, the actress herself was only around 17 or 18.
Have you ever heard anything about the Godfather, or how Al Pacino was portraying a dirty pedophile/nonce? I haven’t, but the movie is also from another era. I can already “visualize” the outrage if you had this movie done today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3cRBjsDtm0&list=RDn3cRBjsDtm0&index=1
theantifeminist
November 26, 2025 at 7:54 pm
“For the Roman male, the ideal woman would be a buxom 16 year old with ‘skin as white as wax, sparkling eyes, sweet breath, lustrous dark or auburn hair’ – no blondes or redheads – ‘a scented, sensuous, lissom body and a shaved clitoris, glowing like a pearl’. ”
Source: https://www.amazon.com/Lives-Roman-Emperors-NIGEL-CAWTHORNE/dp/076078311X/
——————————————————————————————————————
“In Ancient Rome, by age 14, men viewed girls as ladies when girls reached that age. In the Western Roman Empire, women married usually in their late teens. Christian women in the Roman period married at around 17 or 18 years old, and, according to research, it was considered the typical marriage age for women at the time, even among the lower class, urban and Western Roman Empire, and even before Christianity took over Rome.”
“Men usually married at ages 27 to 30, with an age gap involving a decade or slightly more. Among the upper class, women married often in their early teens and men in their late 20s, which is a bigger age gap.”
“In Ancient Greece, girls got married at around age 12-16 to men who were ages 25-30.”
Source:
https://thingstotellmankind.blogspot.com/2019/12/the-history-of-pedophilia-and-sex.html
“The History of Pedophilia and Sex Offenders: How the Moral Panic Over Pedophiles and Sex Offenders Began”
Be warned, it is very long.
Thanks Steve, yes it is long but it looks like it is worth studying. It certainly has a lot of useful info in it.
“Teen Angel” reached number 1 on the Billboard Charts in 1960, a song lamenting the loss of a 16 year old sweetheart who has died in a car crash. The singer Mark Dinning would have been 26/27 at the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG_VIcoiCFA
Cool interview from hot porn star Naomi Swann in March 2020, just before the internet companies began the purge of pro-male sexuality content. The video was destroyed, but the transcript remains.
She says she first had sex at age 14, and expresses no regret. She also doesn’t say the age of her boyfriend, which almost certainly means he was over 18, and since she grew up in Florida, that makes him a big “child sexual abuse” criminal in that radfem state.
She also says she was a slut, peaking in promiscuity at age 16, and she banged a 50 year old man during that time. Rad!
https://interviews.adultdvdtalk.com/naomi-swann-video/
Note that “the Youtube account associated with this video has been closed”. Censorship moves fast !
I grew up on ‘Tiswas’ as a kid.
https://x.com/SancastleAir/status/2008996853464138062
A friend of a friend knew the singer of Wheatus around the early 2000’s. He said the singer constantly made sexual comments about young girls at his shows and ridiculed the concept of marriage (now he’s married, he cucked out). In this performance from 2001, at 2:53 the singer makes fun of the prude girl in the “evening dress” in the audience. And at 3:38 you can see the percussionist holding the shakers in the form of an erect phallus while all the teen girls are on stage singing along. The singer was 28 at the time.
Someone in the Youtube comments notes: “Jesus Christ does anybody really remember that time when chicks were jumping on the Teenage Dirtbag and In Too Deep or Rollin? Fuck it! Life was much better”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-I-JNB2rYjs
This post is in honor of Alexander Cashford, killed by brainwashed teenage boys at the behest of an evil girl, all indoctrinated by the evil feminist government, society and media.
Donnie “Buz” Lukens was a Republican senator from Ohio until 1990, after he was discovered having a relationship with a 16 year old when he was 58, alleged to have started when she was 13. The Ohio age of consent is 16, but they charged him with delinquency anyway because he gave the girl “gifts.” The judge noted Buz had “no remorse whatsoever.” His sentence? 30 days in jail and $500! Today, they would at least charge him with underage solicitation.
Which brings us to 2025 and Indiana Senator Justin Eichorn. His great crime? Being a 40 year old man and soliciting an undercover cop posing as a 17 year old girl. In 2021, this grand pedocrite made the public statement “before you know it, they’ll be reading kids ‘50 Shades of Grey.’” Unfortunately for Pedocrite Eichorn, it’s not 1990 Ohio state court he faces today, but rather 2026 Indiana federal feminist court, where he faces a mandatory minimum sentence of… 10 years in prison. Whoops! Worked so hard to climb so far in a system that wants him dead.
And showing the true largesse of our loyal and angelic women in 2025 who must be protected at all costs from competition by willing 17 year old hotties (or whatever’s left of them if they even exist anymore), Eichorn’s wife divorced him just one week after his arrest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buz_Lukens
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Eichorn
https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/gop-state-sen-justin-eichorn-arrested-suspicion-soliciting-sex-17-year-old-girl
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2025/06/10/former-senator-justin-eichorn-seeks-to-dismiss-federal-charge
Thanks Anon69. In general though, these historic cases of people getting punished for underage sex don’t really fit in with ‘preserving the past’, unless you’re pointing out that there were paedocrites back then too.
It also shows the contrast in punishments for essentially the same crime then vs now. The attitude was much more relaxed.
Ahh, I see now – sorry. I read your comment late last night when I was already half asleep.
“Mila Kunis was just 14 when she auditioned for That ’70s Show in 1998. The casting call required actresses to be at least 18, but Kunis said, ‘I’ll be 18 on my birthday,’ without specifying when. Producers were so impressed by her audition that they kept her despite later learning the truth.”
https://x.com/scenesthatslap/status/2012248579293782356
Outraged paedocrites in the replies.
Are there at least some “dissident” comments?
I don’t see any.
And without looking it up, I’d wager that Mila Kunis now says she was ‘exploited’ and that it ‘creeped her out’ that men were ogling her teen body.
“I looked up to them at 14. The trajectory of my career could’ve gone any which way.. but the set was cool.” So far, she’s been cool, we’ll see in another 10 years. She and Ashton also supported Danny Masterson at great cost. What the disgusting feminist US judicial system did to Masterson is one of the greatest feminist crimes of the 21st century.
I’d never seen “That 70s Show” so I didn’t think of Danny Masterson’s rape conviction watching that clip. I see that the feminist judge who jailed him for life denied him bail while he appealed on the grounds that he had divorced from his wife.
“In January 2024, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge denied bail for Masterson pending an appeal with worries Masterson could flee. “If defendant’s conviction and sentence are upheld on appeal, he will likely remain in custody for decades and perhaps the rest of his life,” wrote Judge Charlaine Olmedo. “In light of the fact that defendant has no wife to go home to, defendant now has every incentive to flee and little reason to return to state prison to serve out the remainder of his lengthy sentence should his appeal be unsuccessful,” the judge added in reference to the ongoing divorce proceedings between Masterson and Bijou Phillips.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Masterson#Sentencing
That’s good to know that Mila Kunis stuck by him and hasn’t done the typical reframing of her teen stardom…yet. I’ll have to watch some more of her, hehe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_meWnvth1ss
At 6:08, 14 year old Mila and 19 year old Ashton on the couch feeling each other up and making sexual innuendos. Criminal child sexual abuse and grooming in California and Wisconsin, but no problem in the late 90’s!
Ironically Kutcher served as a mascot to one of organisations that were behind EU’s chatcontrol.
https://theantifeminist.com/november-news-2025/#comment-644805
Star of That ‘70s Show and a host of Hollywood hits, 45-year-old Kutcher resigned as chairman of the Thorn board in mid-September amid uproar over a letter he wrote to a judge in support of convicted rapist and fellow That ‘70s Show actor Danny Masterson, prior to his sentencing.
Up until that moment, however, Kutcher had for years been the very recognisable face of a campaign to rid the Internet of CSAM, a role that involved considerable access to the top brass in Brussels.
In the mid 1970’s, Aerosmith’s Steven Tyler (26) had a 16 year old girlfriend. Her mother signed a document that made Tyler the legal guardian of the girl, so he wouldn’t get arrested for bringing her on tour. Even with that document today, he would absolutely be arrested due to feminist changes in state and federal laws. They were quite public about their relationship, and no one cared at all, in fact people laughed about it. Of course she came back decades later and sued for cash and prizes under completely unconstitutional Metoo retroactive feminist laws, but her lawyers screwed up and she lost on a technicality, leaving us instead with a well-documented instance of normal male heterosexual history.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-31/woman-sues-steven-tyler-alleging-child-sex-assault-in-1970s/101819084
This came up on my YouTube feed today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TfmHs676L4
“The Twisted Story of Bow Wow Wow”.
Malcom McLaren created a band back in the 80s from Adam and the Ants members and a 13 year old girl as the singer (Annabella Lwin), lol. The mangina presenting the YouTube video is outraged that they featured her nude on their first album cover when she was 14.
“Clearly back then there was no safeguarding in the music industry”.
No, it was just back then that people weren’t prudes and recognized that 14 year olds were not really children and wouldn’t be destroyed by simply posing and recreating a famous painting. Wait until he hears that The Sun was publishing topless pics of 16 year olds every day and other tabloids were counting down the days they could do similar for busty 15 year olds.
From the band’s Wikipedia page: “One notorious track from the mini-album was “Sexy Eiffel Towers”. It was credited to Ashman, Barbarossa, Gorman, and McLaren and included suggestive moaning and heavy breathing performed by then-14-year-old Lwin. Other controversial tracks included “Louis Quatorze” (which called attention to Lwin’s young age),”
The YouTube video quotes Annabella as saying that McLaren unnerved her by staring at her, but then she discovered that he stared that way at everybody.
Tha’s funny because when I started watching the video, I remembered back to the 90s when I was at university. One evening I was waiting for a tube train at Sloane Square station (Chelsea) and I glanced to my left (the platform was fairly empty) and to my astonishment Malcom McLaren was standing some way away, just staring at me. I was obviously shocked to see a celebrity like him, particularly staring at me, but then he just smiled and looked away.
Prominent Kentucky statesman Cassius M. Clay married 15 year old Dora Richardson when he was 84 years old. Newspapers carried the story nationwide, yet it was more of a spectacle than a condemnation or call to violence against Clay, and the marriage was allowed.
If you look at that article’s comments at the link below, many are from supportive family descendants without one “pedo” accusation, showing how pedohysteria was still relatively muted in 2017. It’s still possible to visit White Hall in Kentucky today, where the state maintains the historical site of a proud pedophile according to the citizens of Kentucky in 2026.
https://www.jpinews.com/2017/11/09/my-kentucky-cassius-m-clays-child-wife-dora/
The other Cassius M. Clay from Kentucky, otherwise known as Muhammad Ali, banged several 16 year olds in his late 20’s, and married 17 year old Belinda Boyd. Reddit is very angry about this in our current year, especially when they see the picture of Belinda looking at Ali like a Ribeye steak. I don’t think Redditors have any enjoyable sex at all.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RareHistoricalPhotos/comments/1fmbaxl/muhammad_ali_24_flirts_with_future_wife_belinda/
– r/Jailbait –
Reddit used to be an open minded place built around free speech, like the rest of the classic internet. In 2008, there was a subreddit called “r/jailbait” that was extremely popular, and thus awarded subreddit of the year by Redditors. Similar to hotornot.com, another casualty of feminist tyranny, this subreddit was filled with sexual pictures and videos mostly shared by beautiful teens under 18 themselves, and men who encouraged them.
Jealous feminists and their cuck slaves found out about this, and promptly called for the sick de-sexualization of the girls (by labeling them “children”) and for r/jailbait to be banned, with possible legal action against Reddit. Government representatives got involved and pressured Reddit, and after a brief defense of free speech, Reddit folded like a deck of cards, and r/jailbait was destroyed in 2011. Gawker feminists also doxxed the creator of the subreddit and got him publicly shamed on CNN and fired from his job, as an example to any other intrepid men.
Here is the Vice article about this from 2011. It’s notable how the tone of the article is almost comical, as opposed to today, where the tone of the article would be gravely serious:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/reddit-jailbait-section-is-dead/
Here is the infamous CNN piece hosted by homosexual CIA “intern” Anderson Cooper, that featured a black feminist justice department agent and her cuck slave railing against r/jailbait, which created the mini feminist moral panic that resulted in the subreddit’s demise:
https://edition.cnn.com/videos/bestoftv/2011/09/29/ac-reddit-allowing-porn.cnn
During last summer (2025) I made some other media references that pertain “Preserving the Past.”
In order to have it in its dedicated blog post, I am posting it once more here.
https://theantifeminist.com/fury-of-the-mothers-conway-hall-pie-tom-ocarroll-mob-angry-mothers/#comment-640235
“Going back to Schindler’s List. Another interesting plot in the movie is the “relationship” between Amon Goeth (SS-officer) and his Jewish maid Helen Hirsch who is around 17,18,19. He starts getting attached to her and even develops sexual desire for her. Note that unlike Oskar Schindler and him kissing Jewish girls, the sexual desire from Amon Goeth towards Helen Hirsch is fabricated and made up for the movie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7vXc2HsMZg Starts at around 0:52
But there is reason why I still mention it here. The portrayal of men’s sexual desire towards young women especially in that area between 15-19. It was still possible to show something like this to a greater audience without causing a big(ger) outrage because of some arbitrary age or age gap, compared to today at least. What was the point about Amon Goeth’s desire for Helen Hirsch. Back then, when to movie was made and shown, nobody cared about the age gap portrayed or that he is a supposed “predator/pedophile.” The point was to show how he was wavering in his conviction that the Jews are vermin, and not human. Nowadays as you can guess what the reaction would be nonce this, pedophile and predator that…yadda yadda yadda
Let me reference two more movies you have probably seen, Jurassic Park (1993) and American Beauty (1999), and a television show Californication (2007-2014)
Jurassic Park (the movie/not the book) by comparrison is tame. As you know it is not about a love story or anything like that. But the protagonists, Alan Grant 40s and Ellie Sattler 20s are in an age gap relationship. The movie does very little to show that they are an actual couple, and show very little PDA. I watched that ad nauseum as a child, and even as I grew older, I have never once heard any criticism about that until a couple of years ago (mid-late 2010s). All of the sudden the love part of the relationship that wasn’t even really portrayed was seen as problematic.
American beauty clearly shows what many middle-aged men want, but don’t admit. No an old, nagging wife that makes your life miserable, but a young, attractive women that gives you everything you desire. Keep in mind the young woman he desires is 16 or 17 if I recall correctly. Again, making such a movie today? Same pattern.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cKcCGHuojc
Californication ran from 2007-2014. The show starts with the protagonist having sex with an 16-year-old (actress is older, but potrays a 16-year-old), and she was the one who initiated it, though he didn’t know at the time that she was 16. In this show, while the sexual encounter with her was not advocated as something good, and eventually he went to court, but not to prison, the whole tone or vibe was not about portraying him as this evil monster that deserves only the worst one could wish on a human.
Season one was released in 2007, and even up to this point such shows could still be aired without a big uproar. I doubt this show could have started in 2017 like that. As in my reply to “anon69”, the latest big shift pertaining all of this must have happed around the mid-late 2010s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72XClfJ1Grw”
For Californication there is another clip I’d recommend watching that I didn’t post the first time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUnMptUqwvQ
The late 2000s were already bad enough in the sense that having sex with an underage girl was a big no no, and you already had severe punishments and prison sentences (depending on the country), and sex offender registers in Anglo countries.
But back then, even though it is fiction (TV show), there was still some semblance that young women can indeed be hot, even for middle-aged men.
Unbelievable that the first season came out almost twenty years ago. Time flies. I just watched a couple of clips again. I enjoyed it. The whole show is a mixture of drama and comedy at the same time. Keep in mind I was much younger back then and still am much younger than AF or Jack. Even back then I never saw what “Hank” did as something disgusting or so horrible that he should have deserved only the worst. In other words, even back then I wasn’t an age cuck.
Edit:
Right after I submitted this post, I found this:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kTs1m-Yl78w
“David Duchovny on Californication Movie and Cancel Culture”
“With series like Monk getting streaming movies years later, we wondered if he’d be interested in doing a Californication movie. He would — but he doesn’t think it would fit with the current culture, for better or worse.”
Looks like my assessment is the same as David Duchovny’s.
@AF, if possible you can put them together.