Chemical castration for sex offenders to be trialled in 20 UK prisons
“The pilot for the voluntary chemical castration of sex offenders will be extended to 20 prisons in England, the justice secretary has said.
Shabana Mahmood said she would expand a small pilot in south-west England to two regions, after an independent sentencing review recommended it continue.”
Remember nearly twenty years ago I was predicting that the combination of Western feminism and Muslim immigration would produce a femislamist hell in the UK and Europe? Do you believe me now?
And don’t think it will stop with chemical castration. The sexual holocaust of men marches on. Within ten years AI will be able to read thoughts with perhaps pinpoint accuracy. I wouldn’t be surprised if the UK government and others force sex offenders to have brain implants fitted for that purpose. If they have any ‘inappropriate’ thoughts, they get recalled to prison, in the same way Gary Glitter was for scrolling through YouTube videos of teenage gymnasts. Or perhaps the implant will simply stop them from having any such thoughts – a neurological castration? I think I remember reading once that ‘paedophiles’ who had been castrated, even physically, still emotionally pined for ‘children’.
I wonder what Alan Turing, the man who invented the modern computer, as well as AI research, would think of this? Forced to undergo chemcial castration himself for buggering a minor (the age of majority in the UK at the time was 21).
This is somehow considered consistent with the European Human Rights Act and prohibitions on cruel and unusual punishments and torture, as I know of at least two European countries where chemical castration has been routinely performed for years.
I hope to God that if superintelligent AIs do take over the world, they will look harshly upon the criminals who are now resurrecting the same torture that they put their ‘father’ through.
Amazon Tribe Sues New York Times Over Story it Says Led to Porn Addict Claims
Last year the New York Times ran a story on the impact of the introduction of Starlink and Internet access upon an isolated Amazonian tribe. The story falsely reported that young men in the tribe had quickly become addicted to Internet porn. Just like most things about the porn addiction industry, it was complete bunkum. The NoFap cult is even willing to exploit and defame innocent Amazonian tribes in order to pursue its 21st century junk science agenda.
“The Marubo, an Indigenous community of about 2,000 people, is seeking at least $180m (£133m) in damages.
The NYT’s story, written nine months after the Marubo gained access to Starlink, a satellite-internet service from Elon Musk’s SpaceX, said the tribe was “already grappling with the same challenges that have racked American households for years”.
This included “teenagers glued to phones”, “violent video games” and “minors watching pornography”, the report said.
It stated that a community leader and vocal critic of the internet was “most unsettled by the pornography”, and had been told of “more aggressive sexual behaviour” from young men.”
Bill to Make Pornography a Federal Offence Introduced by GOP Senator
“A Republican senator aligned with President Donald Trump has introduced a new bill aiming to criminalize pornography, warning against what he sees as its harmful impact on American society.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah, along with Illinois Rep. Mary Miller, unveiled draft legislation they are calling the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), which seeks to stop the production and dissemination of pornographic material and and to empower prosecutors to act against it by redefining the notion of “obscenity” for the internet era.
According to the wording of the bill, which its authors say is consistent with the Communications Act of 1934, a piece of content is obscene if “taken as a whole, [it] appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion,” if it “depicts, describes or represents actual or simulated sexual acts with the objective intent to arouse, titillate, or gratify the sexual desires of a person” and if it “taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.””
Gérard Depardieu found guilty in sexual assault trial
“Claude Vincent, representing one of the two women plaintiffs, described Depardieu as a “misogynist” and a “case-study in sexism”.
But for the defence, Jérémie Assous demanded an acquittal and called the plaintiffs’ team “more militants than lawyers”.
“They cannot bear that there should even be a defence. They think any defence is a supplementary assault,” he told the court.
The first plaintiff – a set decorator called Amélie – told the court that after a minor argument with Depardieu, he caught her between his legs and held her by the hips.
The second woman – an assistant director called Sarah – said the actor touched her buttocks and breasts through her clothes on three separate occasions.
Depardieu denied the allegations, saying only that he might have touched the women accidentally or to keep his balance.
At the end of the hearings, Depardieu said: “My name has been dragged through the mud by lies and insults.
“A trial can be a very special experience for an actor. Seeing all this anger, the police, the press. It’s like being in a science fiction film, except it’s not science fiction. It’s life.”
At least it’s good to see Depardieu remaining defiant. Although he ‘only’ received a suspended sentence, the real punishment is not just the stress of the trial and the harm to his reputation and career, but the fact that he now has to register as an ‘untermensch’.
It’s also refreshing to see a couple of women defending him, particularly Brigitte Bardot, who truly is an outlier among her sex. If only there were more like her.
“Another veteran French actress took Depardieu’s side on Monday. In a rare interview with French television, Brigitte Bardot, 90, deplored how “talented people who touch the buttocks of a girl are consigned to the deepest dungeon.””
“Feminism isn’t my thing,” Bardot said. “Personally, I like men.”
Indeed I remember Bardot calling the MeToo women “ridiculous”.
A similar case as Depardieu’s is that of Nicolas Bedos, a less well-know actor and comedian:
https://variety.com/2024/film/global/nicolas-bedos-sentenced-one-year-prison-sexual-assault-french-actor-director-1236186101/
France has become even more of a feminist shitehole than the UK, in many ways.
On the face of it, I can’t help noticing that the more feminist a society is in Europe, the more Muslims it has. I’m sure there is a correlation. Spain only turned feminazi when it started to get overrun with Muslim immigrants. One obvious connection is that sexual assault and rape inevitably goes up massively, and feminists then have an excuse to bring in more laws and claim ‘rape culture’ (invariably blaming white men when the problem is recent Third World immigrants that they encouraged in).
Eastern Europe is still relatively free from feminist anti-sex hysteria, as well as having almost zero Muslims. I’m not even sure if they would have changed their laws much if they hadn’t had to because of the EU.
However, it doesn’t explain South Korea or Japan. And Norway doesn’t seem to have as much of an immigration problem as Sweden and yet is almost as bad (and doesn’t even have the excuse of being in the EU).
An interesting video from CityCrusher on Christianity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKQwuBvxZtw
Argues that the church is ruled by women and makes some good points as to why Christianity is so attractive to women, although it’s left to one of his commentators to spell out the obvious:
“Women want religions because they’re the most restrictive of male sexuality and ‘the vibes’ are very female”
I hope those pedocrites pass that insane porn censorship law and put half the USA on the sex offender registry, if it’s not close to that already.
“They think any defence is a supplementary assault” – at least someone said it. And Bardot is cool, older women who are satisfied with male attention seem to be very reasonable.
I read the other day that Pornhub alone gets around 1 billion visits EACH DAY!!! I guess some percentage are people visiting multiple times a day, but assuming they are mostly male, it still has to be over 1 in 10 men on the planet visiting just that one porn site every day!
That’s crazy when you consider that just viewing porn is illegal in places like China and many Muslim countries, and that Pornhub is even blocked in many US states and several European countries.
And yet it seems impossible to reach out to virtually ANY of those men. Even if porn does get banned in the US, American men will just shrug their shoulders.
Real Madrid star in trouble for receiving a video from a former teammate showing him having sex with a 16 year old ‘child’.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-14717299/Real-Madrid-star-Raul-Asencio-breaks-silence-criminal-trial-sex-scandal.html
“First 24 Hours for Predators in Prison” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9akVvmu00gs
Some of the comments are surprisingly sane: “Not to defend child molesters. But criminals acting like they are better than them is a joke+quite a dif between someone accused of sleeping with a 17 year old and a guy goin for toddlers” 52 upvotes.
“Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is reintroducing her bill to provide civil recourse for survivors of nonconsensual sexually-explicit deepfakes.”
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/aoc-bill-deepfake-ai-porn-lawsuits-civil-action-1235344708/
“Survivors”, my goodness. A First World feminist problem if there ever was.
We need to stop fantasizing that it’s ‘just’ the right-wing, or it’s ‘just’ the left-wing. Melenia Trump pushes the ‘Take It Down’ act, and this left-wing bitch is promoting the ‘DEFIANCE Act’.
Women are just the same whether they are left or right.
And if the importance they are placing on stopping ‘deepfake porn’ doen’t make it obvious to people it’s a sexual trade union or a pussy cartel than I don’t know what could. Deepfake porn is a form of ‘theft’ for what matters most to women – her sexual resources. That’s why they want society to believe that a man jerking off to an AI-generated pic of Taylor Swift is practically the same as raping her. Because for a pussy cartel it is the same thing. It’s enabling men to get off without ‘paying’ for it.
To be clear, when I say it’s ‘theft’, I mean that is how feminists see it (in reality). At best (or worst) it’s a ‘patent issue’, only women clearly do not deserve ‘patents’ to their own bodies or images – the justification of patents being that it rewards the efforts of inventors and creators, and women were just born with their looks according to the genetic lottery. And in fact, as we know, it’s usually not beautiful young women who are complaining about deepfake porn, it’s the femihags. What ‘theft’ there is, is ‘stealing’ from women in general, so that the general price of sex comes down. A man able to generate nude pics of the hottest young women is even less likely to show any interest to unattractive women.
Hah I remember that Starlink article, and I remember Joe Rogan and other useless institutional idiots parroting back the contents of that article. And millions of people heard that podcast and believed it.
“Women are just the same whether they are left or right.” Indeed. It’s possible if men learned game and how to deal with women, then women would be less fixated on getting paid alot for their sex. Western males are so inept now, and women are so spoiled, that women feel they must get the biggest payoff possible for their sex. And without guard rails around their behavior, and with the encouragement of bad behavior, good game definitely can’t come close to fixing this problem. But still, the fact remains that women are powerless to do anything without the cooperation of enough violent simp males in women’s schemes.
You know, if women’s looks were a patent issue, that would certainly be more acceptable than a hysterical hoax narrative about how generating a video on your computer is somehow rape. I saw when the great satan USA government passed the anti-AI porn law, they found a bunch of parents whose children either killed themselves or could be brought out in front of the cameras to talk about their “survivor” stories. Very well calculated by the politicians, they know women will eat up the attention related to being on the news etc.
Of course, no one is talking about the inherent weakness and idiocy here – how about talking to your kid so they don’t kill themselves over a fake internet video? But then again, these parents are so stupid and weak themselves that they wouldn’t even know what to say to their kid, in fact they would make it worse by freaking out, as the ones who make alot of noise about this bullshit always do. Like George Carlin says, it’s a culture of obsessive diaper sniffers where children have no freedom, because with freedom comes responsibility, and no one wants any of that, women least of all. So, government tyranny is happy to oblige the weakness of its population.
Macron getting shoved in the face by his tranny wife pretty much sums up the state of our male leaders today.
She banged him when he was 15 (some say even earlier) and not only does he marry her, but he stil passes a law making it ‘rape’ for a man to have sex with a 14 year old. I bet she pushed him into that too.
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1927025096339710419
I’m sure Macron and his wife stopped at 14 because they knew their own life-story would be held against them if they went up to 15.
Very probably Jack. BTW, I saw the comment you left at Eivind’s regarding O’Carroll. I agree (obviously). Eivind is a little bit like O’Carroll in 1977. He’s been very lucky so far in being able to publicly discuss the age of consent and sex laws all these years. Now, presumably because he’s frustrated with the lack of attention to his blog, he’s saying things like “four years olds aren’t toddlers”. If he continues on that path, he’ll probably face his own “fury of the mothers” moment.
As regards the gay pederast activists, one thing that really makes me vomit is that so many of them campaign for a lower age of consent for gay sex, but to keep it as it is for girls. They justify this in the feminist way by claiming that the ‘power differential dynamics’ and such are not present in ‘man – boy’ relationships. In other words, like absolute rats, they think that feminists will let them fuck young boys so long as they allow themselves to be co-opted in supporting the heterosexual age of consent. Well, I guess they do understand the Sexual Trade Union and why feminists want a high age of consent.
Yeah, we’ve all seen how much worse a girl acts when she’s got a homosexual male as a best friend. The homosexual is often a worse thing to encounter than a fat or old female best friend.
“I hope to God that if superintelligent AIs do take over the world, they will look harshly upon the criminals who are now resurrecting the same torture that they put their ‘father’ through.”
Interesting point. Women who come from more restrictive countries are always eager to over-exercise their new feminist powers. Eddie Murphy had a good joke about never bringing your Congo wife back to the states.
Re: Macron and the general cucked state of all western men, maybe it’s a sexual/hormonal thing? Cuck and tranny porn use has exploded. I don’t consider myself to be an ultra-high T man, perhaps it’s just avoidance of microplastics and pesticides that made me see through the feminist hoaxes.
There is definitely some kind of filter going on as regards being able to see the feminist sex law hoaxes. Not wishing to brag, but I’m in my fifties and I had my testosterone measured a couple of years ago and it was higher than the average male teen.
The thing that gets me though, is that there are still millions of men, like me and Jack, who were alive in the 70’s and 80’s, and can aboslutely remember how different things were, and how the 21st century idea that to find teen girls attractive is ‘perverted’ or ‘paedophilia’ is an absolute (modern) lie. Why aren’t more of us speaking out? Or at least admitting that things were different? I’m not sure if environmental issues can explain that, other than just feminist brainwashing, or simple cowardice.
At the same time, Society want children to insinuate themselves everywhere:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/french-adult-only-holidays-risk-122139532.html
Why is this? So that children can be used to incriminate men everywhere? Or in order to have a pretext for declaring all “adult” venues illegal? Swinging clubs will have to close because they are “intolerant to children”? If a high-flying neighbour has sex parties on his property, you show up with your child on some pretended errand, then you sue your neighbour because your child got traumatized for life by what he/she caught a glimpse of or overhead? As Eivind would say, just when you thought no escalation was possible, esclation gets taken yet another step further.
I still remember the days when a German airline had flights Frankfurt-Frankfurt. What for you may ask? They were short flights during which couples would have sex. You then got a “certificate” that you belonged to the few people on Earth who had sex at 9 thousand feet. Unthinkable nowadays.
I was on the train in Germany (first class carriage) just a couple of days ago and some American couple were letting their little girl wander up and down the aisle. I felt uncomfortable thinking if she lost her balance and knocked into me I could get falsely accused. Then there are the teen girls who dress like complete sluts expecially when they are off on their summer vacations, and creep shame you if you so much as glance in their direction.
It’s ironic how these same feminists in France (and elsewhere) are demanding that much of the Internet becomes completely closed off to ‘children’ under age verification laws. Nice name though (Sarah El Hairy), lol. I assume that’s a Muslim surname. Probably is an attempt to indirectly shut down swingers hotels and the like, as you say, just like the age verification laws are really about shutting down the porn industry.
“As Eivind would say, just when you thought no escalation was possible, esclation gets taken yet another step further.”
I don’t want to bore everybody with another criticism of Eivind, but as you did invoke him (lol!) I would say though that only a believer in the ridiculous ‘cultural drift’ theory could ever think that things have reached the end point (and might even now mysteriously ‘drift’ back in the other direction). If Eivind could take off whatever intellectual blinkers that are keeping him from seeing the obvious, then he would understand that there is no end point as feminists are continuously trying to manipulate the sex market in their favor. Not only will this ‘never end’, but it will continue to get worse at an even faster rate, as technology is continuously causing the sex market to disadvantage older or plainer women.
Believing in a metaphysical force such as ‘cultural drift’, and the possibility that society will somehow swing back to more liberal times is pure fantasy, as much as Muslim martyrs believing that 72 virgins await them in paradise. Or that investors will flock to a 90’s design ‘fertile dating’ site run by a ‘proud paedophile’ who thinks fathers should have the right to have sex with their pre-pubescent sons.
The only possible end of the legislative creep (now turning into more of a sprint) is some radical upheaval in society that removes the primary cause – a majority of women (who tend to be older and so with political power) being disadvantaged sexually.
I find it difficult to see how anybody can take ‘cultural drift’ seriously. I mean, is Eivind really claiming that, for example, the growth of the Internet has not played any role in driving paedohysteria and anti-sex laws? If it has, then that’s technology not cultural drift. And what role do feminists have in all of this? If it’s ‘cultural drift’, then what agency do feminists have? It would be silly to blame them at all if they are just being pushed by a vague and mysterious ‘cultural drift’.
Aside from all of that, and perhaps most importantly, it’s just tactically clueless again. How do you fight ‘cultural drift’, and how do you expect anybody to get fired up to ‘fight’ it?
Tinder is considering allowing users to set a height preference: https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/29/tinder-tests-letting-users-set-a-height-preference/
I tried Tinder a couple of years ago, and even paid for the premium service, and it wouldn’t allow me to set an age preference. Consequently, I was only shown middle-aged bags. (I even lied about my age and set it 5 years younger!).
If a male sexual trade union really did exist on the level of feminism, it would be banning women from dating men over 6 ft tall. The worst thing in the world for a woman would be to get accused of being attracted to tall men.
Regarding Tinder, what happened a couple of years ago if I remember right, was that women using Tinder wanted to be able to ascertain a man’s height. They even demanded the men pose for a pic in front of some object (like a door) from which their real height could be guessed. The male Tinder community reacted by demanding the women stop lying about their weight.
Note that AI is going to take pic cheating a step futher than simple photo-shopping. It’s an example of unintended consequences: hitherto sending and posting pics was a way to convey looks without the need to meet in person. Now it’s going to become worthless.
What I like about AI pics is that pictures of sexy women and even porn can be generated without any money flowing to real models. This could mean more sexy women will need to go into escorting if they want to make any money off their looks.
Absolutely Jack. And perhaps young women will be more inclined to pursue ‘sugar daddies’ again if they can no longer just whore from home on OnlyFans for thousands of simps.
And if AI does ever cause mass unemployment, then I can imagine that it will also cause mass prostitution.
Right-wing former MMA fighter Jake Shields is promoting ‘straight male’ t-shirts:
https://x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1929759815104188521
At least it says “girls” and not “women”, though Shields is a typical Conservative arsehole paedocrite who spends half his time blathering on about Epstein. If only they could see that the modern gay rights agenda and paedohysteria are closely related?
Eivind should start selling MAP t-shirts or whatever he wants. He’d be taking advantage of the fact that he can register as a company director as he is ‘public’ about his activism. Maybe something a little more subtle, like a verse from the A.E.Housman poem he quoted the other day.
I like A.E. Housaman because he sounds more like a MGTOW than like a gay activist. I’ve liked to apply this to myself whenever I escaped from a stifling relationship :
Oh, when I was in love with you
Then I was clean and brave,
And miles around the wonder grew
How well did I behave.
And now the fancy passes by
And nothing will remain,
And miles around they’ll say that I
Am quite myself again.
Well, I have to admit that Eivind (and you) have introduced me to a poet that I’d never read before, and who I will probably enjoy a lot!
I find some gay writers and activists inspiring, at least when they are not paedocrites.
For example, the novelist Christopher Isherwood. They might have been talking about gay sexuality (pederastry) back then, but the stigmas and rules they were brave enough to speak up about apply to us all now, gay and straight.
And one ‘MAP’ who I do consider to have been truly brave and dignified was the pederast who went to prison for having an ‘indecent’ drawing of a boy, and who spent the rest of his life behind bars because he refused to apologize or pretend he was ‘reformed’. Not sure if he did identify as a ‘MAP’, but anyway, that’s the sort of person you have to admire for their integrity and defiance.
Proust is of course the best example of a first-rate writer who was 100% gay and who was not a paedocrite. But he wrote in times where feminism wielded little power anyway. There was little need for paedocracy in his days.
Proust was also a Jew, which nowadays kind of protect his legacy against criticism about his predilection for perversities. I’m sure his reputation as a writer was boosted after his death because he had this double victimhood (gay + jew).
Anthony Powell was – exaggeratedly in my opinion – dubbed “the English Proust”. I regard Powell as the better writer of the two.
Andrew Tate, the real ‘leader’ of the Male Sexualist movement – even if he doesn’t mention the age of consent – talking about misogyny: https://x.com/Cobratate/status/1929514583519088736
“There is no “misogyny” problem.
Men are simply sticking up for themselves again after being insulted and degraded for years.
You expect us to do all the work, pay all the taxes be wrecked by the courts and have no opinions or views?
We are no longer slaves to females.”
The MAPs are still pathetic slaves to females.
Tate’s message is of course encouraging taken by itself. But look a little deeper into Tate, and you find it’s overwhelmingly likely he’s on the intelligence agency payroll. He’s an agent provocateur meant to co-opt the growing population of angry men and redirect them against their own interests.
Similar to how the MAGA movement pretended and pretends to be masculine and anti-feminist, but then turns around and focuses all their efforts against “human trafficking,” trannies invading women’s spaces, 17 year old loving “pedophiles” like Epstein, and just an endless list of anti-male laws meant to “protect the children,” not to mention Trump’s latest privacy destroying edict that consolidates all personal information in any government agency into one centralized database.
But at least we can have fun with Tate’s messages until he inevitably posts the next drivel denying attraction to young girls.
Young Australian woman set male friend on fire after he made a ‘misogynistic’ remark. She only received 7 years in prison. I don’t have the DailyMail link, but apparently it’s full of women saying things like “you go girl”. Even many men (maybe Eivind’s paedophile followers, lol!).
https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ktgldb/reactions_to_corbie_jean_walpole_burning_a_man/