MAPs and ‘ephebophiles’ claim to be a sexual minority like homosexuals and look vainly for the same kind of protected status from the left. In fact, the history of homosexuality, and the history of male sexual attraction towards teenage girls, demonstrates how absurd it is to think of MAPs as being a ‘sexual orientation’ or a persecuted minority.
‘MAPs’ and ‘ephebophiles’ simply can’t deny, at least if they have more than a couple of brain cells, that male attraction to teenage girls was entirely normal – in fact, the norm – for most of human history. Our ‘Preserving the Past’ page is a mounting collection of proof of that. But MAPs look around and see that today only a handful of other men are calling themselves MAPs or ephebophiles, or even admitting that they are attracted to teenage girls, indeed even refraining from screaming ‘paedophile’ at other men, and assume that – whether it’s because of social conditioning, culture, or just something that has changed in men – they are in a very small minority. The ‘ephebophile’ blogger “Human-Stupidity” actually put forward this argument here in the comments section once (that most men aren’t attracted to teens anymore because of social conditioning).
Can social conditioning produce a “sexual minority”?
Whilst there are likely more “gay” men around today than at most other times in history, gay men are still a small minority, despite homosexuality arguably being extolled and sanctified while heterosexuality is demonized. And that minority was obviously still there throughout history, including during times when homosexuality was persecuted and gay men even executed (look at places like Iran or Chechnya today – homosexuals still exist but most, for obvious reasons, stay in the closet).
Yet MAPs believe that a sexual norm (attraction to teen girls) has become a tiny minority of men (MAPs) in the space of a few generations or less, simply because of social conditioning.
The history of homosexuality shows that this simply isn’t possible. All that has happened is that men have embraced paedocrisy and gone into the closet.
Brief Thoughts about Sexual Identity, Genes, and Social Conditioning
The fact that homosexuality persists in all times and places, no matter the level of persecution or taboo, demonstrates that it is largely genetic. This has been shown in various studies. Attraction to teen girls is clearly also genetic, and history (and evo-psy theory) demonstrates that nearly all men must be genetically hard-wired to find teenage girls attractive. Being a ‘MAP’ or ‘ephebophile’ could only be genetic in the sense that autism might be genetic.
MAPs are not choosing to be attracted to teenage girls, they are choosing to label themselves as being attracted to teenage girls (in a society in which such a thing is now absurdly taboo). This is a sexual political identity if anything, and to my knowledge, most MAPs do not see their self-identification as political (other than as a way to get protected status for being a ‘sexual minority’) and really do believe they are different to most men.
MGTOWs are not and do not pretend to be a sexual minority or a sexual orientation. It is a lifestyle choice embraced through a sexual political ‘identity’ or label. The equivalent for those currently calling themselves ‘MAPs’ would be my suggestion of ‘Men Love Teens Only’ (MLTOs). Not a sexual orientation or a sexual minority that validates the feminist slanders and embraces their slave label, but which stands proud as a lifestyle choice and political identity in the face of feminist persecution. This is a slave rebellion, not a meek acceptance of the slave master’s dehumanizing labels.
***Important note: I am, as always, talking of pursuing legal teens, or of simply acknowledging one’s attraction and love for teenage girls of any age. Perhaps we should call it ‘Men Love Legal Teen Ages’ (MLLTA) pronounced ‘Meh-Loh-Lee-Tah’ (hahahaha).
This is indeed a slave rebellion, and in fact a guerrilla war, something that guys like Larson and Yee were too dumb to understand, and they paid the price by conventionally fighting with an overwhelmingly powerful enemy, like the millions of other normal men persecuted by the fake feminist laws.