Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling women runners
“Undercover police officers have started a new campaign to crack down on men catcalling female runners – by posing as joggers themselves.
Surrey Police sent two officers out running at rush hour to show the scale of harassment that women are facing.
‘These behaviours may not be criminal offences in themselves, but they need to be addressed,’ a spokesman for the force said about the patrols.
The campaign, however, has been criticised by free speech activists who said the police should be focusing on enforcing existing laws.
It comes as reporters from the news outlet LBC joined officers on patrol during the evening rush hour in Reigate, Surrey.
During the operation, plain clothes police officers, who were dressed in athletic jogging gear, headed to areas identified as ‘harassment hotspots’.
Meanwhile, specialist units waited nearby to intervene at the first sign of abuse.
According to LBC, the two female undercover cops were ‘targeted within minutes’ by a man in a large truck who ‘honked at them and made gestures out the window’.
I run regularly and often have had women stare at my crotch, sometimes licking their lips. If I ran in tight lycra pants like most female joggers do, I would get it even more.
Prince Andrew Eviscrated for Getting Lots of Premium Pussy
Poor Prince Andrew is being put through the media meat grinder again. In a newly published biography, not only is his relationship with Saint Epstein raked over again, but his entire sex life is condemned. And it’s a sex life that, in any other era than our own, would be lauded and envied as the most successful possible. Even Saint Epstein himself allegedly said that Andrew was the only person he knew who was more addicted to pussy than he was!
“On his fascination for sex, an unnamed source claims Andrew lost his virginity at the age of 11, which the same source likens to a form of abuse.”
The great MRA CityCrusher pointed out the kind of jealousy involved when it comes to male bitches accusing real men of ‘grooming’ teen girls, in this video shared by reader Steve.
Restored Posts
I have restored the following posts:
(2011) 40% of Mexican schoolgirls dream of romance with a drug gangster
(2012) Norwegian Sex Activist on Eivind Berge : ‘The Law on Paying for Sex Leads to Angry Young Men’
(2012) Five Feminists On Board The Titanic – Four Survived…The Other Was A Male Feminist
This is a good video from Lui Marco, who is a bodybuilder but quite often talks about men’s rights and the dating situation. Apparently, men are so afraid of approaching women now, that women are complaining they are having to resort to tactics such as stealing businessmen’s lunches and then phoning them to apologize in the hope of getting a date, lol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RkhWTb57tU
Going back and forth with good and bad news. This is what we are fighting against.
https://www.youtube.com/@jidionpremiunm
This is a predator hunter channel. Look how popular this channel is. Look at the view count. Look at the comments, the upvotes. Some of them are in the tens of thousands.
Admittedly, some of the baits’ ages are very young, too young. Some are in the single digits. But you also have baits portrayed as 14-,15-year-olds.
This is the current Zeitgeist we are living in. This is what most people are drawn to. That’s what they want to see. Good luck trying to advocate for lowering the AOC (I already mentioned this). Good luck dating younger, but still AOC compliant, like I mentioned in my last reply with the 16-year-old.
Yes Steve, I’m not sure if somebody on ‘our side’ is ever going to get millions of followers and likes. The only way it might happen anytime soon is if somebody like Trump or Andrew Tate get convicted of sex offences, come fully out against anti-sex hysteria (including paedohysteria), and yet manage to maintain a huge chunk of their loyal followers.
The reality is that nearly every person you pass in the street would like to see us locked up or physically hurt just for discussing these issues.
I was thinking of creating a post of some of the very worst paedohunter videos – the ones where they beat up their sting victims. I’m not sure though. On the one hand, it’s important to fully understand the hate out there, on the other hand, I guess one of the reasons you all come to this blog is as a kind of respite from all the hate and irrationality (altough of course, we do discuss the latest madness).
May your prayers be heard………..partly
https://x.com/Cobratate/status/1890004411792990537
Looks like that tweet is still up. That’s the best I can give you.
Great stuff. 15K likes too. I used to have a Twitter account (as the antifeminist) and he liked several of my replies to his Tweets. I was also familiar with him long before he became notorious or even well-known as there was a connection between him and the MMA gym I used to train at.
That citycrusher vid was an excellent takedown of these virgin cuck losers.
Re: Jidion
People of a “certain race” are drawn to the opportunity for socially acceptable confrontation and violence? “Color” me surprised! I have to admit it was the first time I’ve seen videos of people of a “certain race” in the back of a cop car without handcuffs looking for someone else to arrest. And I will gladly make these kinds of jokes about someone doing what he’s doing.
Re: Lui Marco
The 2nd woman in the red dress is the reality. The first woman is of course lying and projecting all her own antisocial mental issues on men, as usual. That’s why this belief is becoming popular.
There are no women writing down their numbers and giving them to men. Women are rejecting male approaches more than ever. I think about how funny this hypocrisy is as I consistently approach. I view every approach now as throwing a rock at the feminist/cuck glass house.
Great video by CityCrusher as always (and round of applause to Steve for finding his channel), but my biggest gripe with that particular video was that Trevor sounded very redundant and repetitive. Most of the video was him making the same points over and over with nothing much more to add. He keeps going on and on about how the Youtuber he’s criticizing is a “jealous nobody” and a “green-eyed monster”. Since the title of the video was about “grooming”, I was hoping that CC would be more endowed to examine and critique “grooming” as a concept, rather than focusing on the motive behind the Youtuber’s (whatever his name was. He doesn’t deserve to be remembered) agecuckery.
Personally, I don’t think it’s necessarily all about jealousy per se and I’m not sure if Trevor recognizes paedohysteria or pedohysteria as a genuine phenomenon, but he should take into consideration that one of main, overlooked reasons (in my opinion) as why everyone beats each up over age gaps is because we have this high moral regard for persevering and protecting “innocence”. We (as in society) want to use this moral superiority complex to justify our agendas that age-gap relationships are inherently dangerous and exploitative (simply because of our perception that older individuals are always mightier and have presumably more life experience, while the other is puny and so oblivious to what he or she is doing). Sure, all a lot of hysteria pertaining to sexuality likely stems from our fear of uncertainty and lack of reproductive control, not just because everyone is jealous and wants to dogpile on you, imo. This is why teenagers are infantilized socially, culturally, and legally, because we are afraid of them losing control. That is why there are so many excuses for being against age-gap relationships, whether that is the teen brain myth or that teens are still “kids” and “children”. If jealousy was a strong motive behind cancel culture, then you would see a lot pedocrites attempting to get away with it, which is ironic.
Like I said earlier, it’s a great video, but one of his weakest ones. Feel free to disagree with me, but I personally prefer his video on adolescence and convenience. There’s one video where he points out that teens are invalidated and “victimized” for having sex with older adults, but the legal system would have no trouble charging them with murder or other non-sexual crimes. It’s like that video he made about that 15 year old girl who turned herself into a Barbie doll and lied about her age to sell her body for money, but ended up stabbing the man she hooked with in the head once he found out that she was underaged. She basically got a slap on the wrist and Trevor referred to her as “real predator”, which I don’t disagree with whatsoever. If the roles were reversed, you would never see that guy ever again. If it was a teenage boy who lied about his age and hooked up with an older woman, the courts would charge him with attempted murder. He said that the age of consent should be sixteen (because he lives in Canada and many places around the world have that as their AOC, including many American states). But he makes an exception and says that the AOC should be 15, because a girl like that is so incredibly conscious that it might as well be lower. Regardless, he says that sixteen year old (post-pubescent) girls are not kids and in fact are young women, which should be obvious to anyone, but the whole purpose of high AOC is to demonize older adults, especially men.
This just popped up in my YouTube feed – somebody has made a compilation of Kate Bush at different ages.
Personally speaking, I think she clearly looks her best at 16-18, although she still looked good until her 50’s. I think she looks quite similar to Ghislaine Maxwell.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/36zubKszyaI
Her first hit song was written when she was 13 and was about her 19 year old boyfriend.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAj8suae3WY
Once again, AF can you read my mind?
I’ve got something interesting for you and the others. I will post this soon.
Haha, looking forward to it Steve!
Linking the Mexican schoolgirl lust for cartel thugs to the discussion me and Duke were having on the historical evidence that ‘MAP’s were the historical norm, from what I’ve read, the cartel bosses themselves are notrious for having sex with young teenage girls.
El Chapo was accused of drugging and raping 13 year old girls at his trial. Of course, it might have been the Feds trying to pin as much as they can on him, and in today’s fucked up world, any sexual relations with minors is considered much worse even than running billion dollar drug cartels and having thousands of men brutally tortured and murdered.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/court-papers-say-witness-claims-el-chapo-had-sex-minors-n966271
But I’m pretty sure he did have underage girlfriends, and I doubt very much he had any need to ‘drug’ them.
In all of history, all the men with power sought out young teenage girls, from Genghis Khan to El Chapo. And funnily enough, all of these men were about as far removed from being Eivind Berge type ‘MAPs’ as is possible to get.
Charlie Veitch almost gets lynched by an AntiFa mob for “going to a concert with a 15 year old girl”.
Watch this from the 30:20 mark for around four minutes and you’ll see the shit show state of Britain today:
https://youtu.be/31CZ8wiNHnc?si=M96-T06VsLG5e7XK&t=1820
Notice the way the teenage girls are dressed who are calling him a pedo. These are the kind of girls who will shout that at you if you so much as glance at them in the street, yet walk around with their butt cheeks on display.
It was filmed by another Manchester YouTuber. Charlie Veitch himself has edited most of it out on his own upload.
It’s interesting though that everybody has known now for a while that Charlie had a 16 year old girlfriend in his 30’s (and started seeing her when she was 15), and yet I doubt if he’s lost a single subscriber because of it, and in fact is getting more and more popular.
“Great find” AF. Great in the sense it shows once more what is going on, but on the other hand it would have been better scenes/situation like these wouldn’t exist at all. It perfectly coincides with the videos/articles of Charie Veitch I posted a couple of days/weeks ago you have already seen. He is lucky that he has personal security. As far as I have seen, he is never alone anymore.
I have to go back once more to my story when I was abroad and spent time with the Brits, and the older Brit hooking up with a woman in her early 20s. Given that the situation wasn’t hostile, but like parrots many of the younger British men were all like, “nonce, nonce, nonce.” If there is one British word I will never forget it is “nonce.”
In your artice and the “medieval” riot, you also had the people chanting “nonce.” There I also said that it seems to be like a national sport that every young Brit participates in.
Again it fits the Zeitgeist. Look at all the predator hunter videos, and their popularity. I hope people in the future will see the insanity, and declare the 21st century as the dark age of pedo hysteria, culminating in the mid-late 2010s to the mid 2020s so far.
AF, you are so right. Look how these young women are dressed. These women probably already have had sex, or send out nudes voluntarily. I mentioned it in my very first post, nowadays the words pedo/nonce have lost their or meaning.
“These are the kind of girls who will shout that at you if you so much as glance at them in the street, yet walk around with their butt cheeks on display.”
It is like the nordic prostitution model. Women are allowed to do anything (supply), but if you as a man want to engage in any way (demand), be it even just a glance, you are done. God have mercy on if you are an older one in particular.
The problem runs very deep. Do you notice something? You obviously have the older crowd that make these insane laws, or have these professional stings/traps organized, but look how even the younger crowd is also infected. I am much younger than you, but when I was that age that definitely did not exist amongst us when I was a teenager and young adult. More and more articles pop up, where those amateur predator hunters that actually beat up the trapped men, are younger men. I was thinking about the incidient that happend recently in Norway. Things have changed very quickly even from my perspective.
I hope anyone of us is aware that the “good old times” of approaching woman, especially younger ones, are gone. It will be interesting to see if they ever come back before we die. I am not just talking about approaching, but even just interacting and being with women in general. There was probably never another time in history where young women are so hostile towards (older) men. For now they don’t want you. I am generalizing here a bit, but this is the trend. It perfectly reflects Anon69’s experience he just told us a couple of days ago.
I think CityCrusher has it right. This stuff runs so deep, you can only explain it with deep hatred of men and their sexuality, particularly older ones.
AF, do you have a video or an article where Charles Veitch is seen or talks about his former 16-year-old girlfriend?
Great points Steve. When I was a teen, all the teen girls wanted to sleep with an older man because it was ‘rebellious’. It was like wanting to start smoking. You wanted to prove you were an adult. It’s crazy that feminists have been able to brainwash teen girls into totally repressing and even subverting that urge, so that they join in mobs like this one, calling a man a ‘nonce’ for once dating a 15 year old.
I also remember reading that when the Soviet army occupied eastern Germany at the end of the war, the Soviet authorities had to go into German schools to tell the 13 and 14 year old girls to stop sleeping with Russian soldiers. And I imagine the average age of Russian soldiers at that time, due to the millions of casualties, was probably well into the 30’s.
Here is a video of Charlie’s alledged teen girlfriend who he took to a festival when she was 15. He took down from YouTube all the videos he made with her, but for some reason they are still up on DailyMotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xk1kyh
BTW, he was a huge leftie back then. He would join pro-Palestinian marches, whereas today he is completely pro-Israel and heckles Pro-Palestinian demonstrators, as well as filming and provoking crackies!
Charlie’s present wife is 21 or 22 I think, and he started dating her when she was 19 or something.
She was cute back then. Can you imagine that people are so hateful of that, they want to see you beaten up, tortured and killed for trying to have sex with a 15-year-old? That’s how bad it is. What makes it even more ironic is that they already sexually active in one way or the other.
When you skim the forums, you will even see how many men write about having violent fantasies when their daughter is over the age of 18, like 18, 19, 20, 21 but dates someone with an age gap. This white knight mindset is quite spread. The man is always “evil”, and a “degenerate”, and the young woman is always an angel.
Two facts I have been becoming very aware of, especially since I have been posting here:
1. In a way I was born in the worst time possible from that perspective. Too young to enjoy much better times, but now I am too old, and I am not even middle-aged yet, to get to know younger women. As I have gotten older, I became more mature, more confident, more established, only to be shit on by society at large for my normal attraction to young women.
2. The more I engage with these topics, the more I think our human species deserves its own demise. We are so smart that we became so dumb again. Look at all the rules, i.e. laws and social customs we nowadays are supposed to adhere to, to get to know a woman. And as you can see, fewer children, marriages, relationships in general.
Yes, society is a cruel torture for us now, especially for older guys. I can’t even count the number of times I get creepshamed each day now for just looking at an attractive young woman. When I was a teen and even in my early twenties, things weren’t nearly as bad, but I was a bit of a ‘mentalcel’ so didn’t get much action even though I had loads of opportunities.
I’m glad I had a real go of the PUA lifestyle about a decade ago, living for months in Kyiv and such. At least I did get to ‘date’ quite a few beautiful young woman and even the odd teen girl, although I was mostly friendzoned.
At least I’m lucky in that I live in a place where prostitution is legal and quite safe (and reasonably cheap!), so I can have regular paid for sex, even when I’m an old man so long as feminists don’t ban it here.
Do you know what still fascinates me? All those men that still fall for those predator hunters.
Anyone that isn’t living in total solitude, in the wild, outside the internet, should know that when a young woman of illegal age is flirting with you on the internet, all your sirens should go off.
The attraction to young, prime women is so strong that even with all these signs for everyone to see, they still fall for it.
“Great points Steve. When I was a teen, all the teen girls wanted to sleep with an older man because it was ‘rebellious’. It was like wanting to start smoking. You wanted to prove you were an adult.”
You mentioned something very important AF. That is something I have noticed myself. Previous generations wanted to become or seen as adults to a much greater degree as soon as possible. Today it is the opposite. You have more and more people that want to infantilize themselves well into adulthood. Have you noticed words like “adulting” are used. Something like, “Stop ADULTING a 20-year-old.” Or people in their mid to late 20s claiming proudly that they were still children until they were 28 years old, and only then become and adult since their brain development wasn’t done according to mumbo jumbo science.
She’s beautiful (and hot). I would like to point out the fantastic Boards of Canada soundtrack as well. A time when Berlusconi was still alive.
I also share all the sentiments of this thread.
I agree, except the time of approaching younger women is not gone if you pick your spots carefully. It is a duty of mine to do so as a protest against what’s happening.
But yes, young women have been greatly empowered to tease, accuse and withhold sex to obtain the most cash and prizes for their sex. And young men have re-routed their increased sexual tension due to this situation into pedohysteria virtue signaling against other men, thinking that embracing feminism against their own gender will get them rewarded with sex, which rarely happens, or turns out with they themselves in the dock.
It’s attention whores and white knights on steroids, in 2025.
Maximization of female sexual opportunity and power. Showing skin/wearing makeup to generate extreme interest, slandering their competition and men who are interested in their competition, while taking pleasure in rejecting all but one or two men, who of course will be called rapists/abusers after the great privilege of having sex with them. Apparently, cucks are more than ok with this arrangement, and especially virgins (and anti-male incels looking to attack male competitors using feminist tactics).
This is why requiring women to cover up is not without justification. Allowing women to sexually distract men in public only works when the society or area has a low level of misandry, such as in a red light district.
Yes, it’s a good point, and I increasingly understand the sentiment now that I get creepshamed more often than not when I glance at a female showing skin.
Women are mostly f****d in the head. A wealthy guy in a flash car getting admiring looks from the average Joe will just put a smile on his face. A hot woman walking around showing her butt cheeks and breasts will give an average Joe admiring her a withering look or even shout at him that he’s a perv or a pedo.
I think most men would prefer that women dress revealingly in public as long as the “Male Gaze” was welcomed and tolerated within reason of course. When women go around dressing revealingly but then complain (using emotional blackmail) about how said “Male Gaze” causes them psychological harm and how they hate being “sexualized” or “objectified” then what normally gives men pleasure (admiring scantilly clad women and girls) becomes a source of stress.
When i had a brief flirtation with Evangelical Christianity in my early 20s i remember the Christian propaganda against “looking at women with lust” and what stress it caused the young Christian men. They would often complain that the young women should do their part to not “lead them to sin” by covering up. The older wives of the elders were certainly happy to take thier side…if only for thier own STU reasons. This whole “Male Gaze” bullshit reminds me A LOT of the Tradcon “thou shalt not look at a woman with lust” except in this case the onus is just on one side. Young women are free to dress how they please but demand that men be subject to thought control when looking at them and this is not healthy. Much as I love to admire female eye candy I have to admit that i find it relatively less unpleasant dealing with “Modestly” dressed women then a half naked woman freaking out if I inflict my Male Gaze on her for a split second and “sexualize” her.
I do not believe. however, that the solution to this is too demand that women “cover up”. First of all they won’t listen to you anyway so it would be a wasted effort. More importantly it is not in the best interest of men as most men like looking at eye candy not being deprived of it. There is also an element of surrender here where having women cover up would give certain factions of the STU exactly what they want. Look at societies where women cover up and the women tend to be a lot uglier on average then women in socities that allow them to dress revealingly. Moving in that direction is not a desirable outcome.
What we need to do is defend our “Male Gaze” (again within reason) and point out what bullshit concepts like “sexualization” and “sexual objectification: are. i have noticed too that especially since the early 2010s in Canada in the GTA where I live increasingly I get scornful looks from women if I check them out in public….and I respond by breifly smirking at them which angers them even more much to my delight. Women have to right to choose what partners they want but they don’t get to pick and choose which men notice them and what men are going to notice them for. Life is not a website that click on and off for your comfort. The argument that they “did not dress that way for me” goes in one ear and out the other …I can admire a beautiful plant and it did not grow itself for me either.
But what is causing this bizarre attitude/behavior in modern women? I mean I remember in the 90s and early 2000s girls who showed skin usually ENJOYED the Male Gaze. Here are a few possible theories:
A) Schopenbecq’s Sexual Trade Union Theory: Older feminist women are manipulating and brainwashing thier younger and sexier competition and making them hate the Male Gaze and Sexualiztion. The aim being to neutralze them as a threat (discouraging men from admiring and pursuing them) while seemingly appearing to be liberal and tolerant due to thier approval of allowing women to dress as they please…as long as men are subject to thought control!
B) City Crusher and to Pro Male Colelctive Theory of the Deselection of men: In this theory Women have historically chosen men for thier utility now that they have no real need for men anymore they have “Deselected” men or at least large quatities of low status men. Due to said reduction of need for men women have become more misandric and intolerant of male sexualty and increasingly see most males as “beneath” them. They then resent being looked at by low status men and see no need to show any empathy with them after all they hold all the cards. Adding fuel to the fire is that men have much higher libidos and drives to be with women than the other way around and this “power imbalance” if you will (men have lost a lot of thier ability to attract women though utility but women still have erotic power over men) puts men at women’s mercy and are being subject to a one sided beatdown.
C) City Crushers Backstabbing Theory: In this theory women (except of the hard core feminists/femiservatives) may have been more accomodating to male sexualty in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and early 00s because they felt they need to ban together with men to defeat traditionalist culture which both men and women felt threatened by. Now that women feel sufficiciently safe from traditionalism women increasingly feel free to bully men and reprogram their sexuality to thier liking…all while telling men they owe them nothing of course. This theory is very depressing (it means that women in general were perhaps always hostile to male sexuality all along) and I want it to be wrong but it is possible…unfortunately yes, I find Citycrusher can at times be depressing to listen to but that does not mean he may not have a point.
D) Steve Moxon’s Cheater Detecting Principle: As discussed in his book the Woman Racket society polices male sexuality by placing men in a dominance heirarchy and punishes men if they try to obtain sexual pleasure in a way that involves them “going above their station. So how does this apply here? Many men in modern western society have lost a lot of their status to pro-female employment discrimination, rsising cost of living and wage suppression caused by excessive immigration levels. This mass increase in males at the low end of the totem pole has meant that society’s cheater detection mechanism is being triggered against an ever increasing number of men…how dare this low status male enjoy that eye candy she is above his station!
Which one is accurate? I think in reality what is going on is a mix of all these things but exactly what that mix is would be up to discussion. Regardless however NEVER feel bad about your male gaze as long as you are not seriously trampling on boundaries or being excessivley intrusive if a thin skinned woman objects to your male gaze FUCK HER (no pun intened of course). The world does not revolve around her hypersensitivity.
BTW glad you are back Shopenbecq I hope you remeber me you were very much missed.
Hi Highwayman! I’m really pleased that you’re back again. I was hoping that you would. That’s a great comment and it’s good to see that you are still reflecting deeply upon these issues. Hopefully one or two more of my former commentators will find the blog again and come back too, such as Alan or Eric.
Thank you and i also hope to see Alan and Eric post here again. Ian B’s return would be a great addition too IMHO I always enjoyed his insights.
Now that you are back, perhaps I should finally write that article I promised many years ago on what age of female is the most attractive to men?
I am sure that article would be awesome!
“then what normally gives men pleasure (admiring scantilly clad women and girls) becomes a source of stress.”
Entirely agree. I intentionally avoid looking at girls, for years now, and it hurts a bit, but it also doesn’t hurt not getting falsely accused or attacked by their trained simps, and it feels good to know I’m actively denying them empowering attention. Even when i’m approaching, I’ve found it’s better to not really look and go in cold, because whenever I stare, it makes them think they’re hot shit and it decreases the odds of the approach being successful. When I go to pros, you can bet I’m looking then lol and it’s 99% welcomed, so it’s no problem for me!
A good executive summary ! By the way you mention “Schopenbecq’s Sexual Trade Union Theory”. Who is this Schopenbecq? When I ask AI it tells me it is a misspelling for “Schopenhauer”. Surely it isn’t. Schopenhauer is our friend, but not to such an extent.
‘Schopenbecq’ used to be my pen name, Jack – I’m surprised you don’t remember. It’s a portmanteau of ‘Schopenhauer’ and ‘Houellebecq’.
Frankly I don’t remember. By the way Houellebecq is now a total charlatan. His last legit work was “Possibility of an Island”. He has long stopped as much as proofreading his writing, is only interested in making himself talked about in order to make money. I’m sure he now writes everything through AI (or has someone else ghostwrite). He has retracted all his antifeminist and anti-muslim stances. He was never much of an antifeminist to start with, rather the kind of antifeminist parroting that “feminism damages women”.
His writing style has definitely deteriorated, made worse for an English reader having to read a translation (or maybe it’s even worse in the original?). I thought ‘Submission’ had a lot of good insights, but was a struggle for me to enjoy until it picked up in the last third.
Yes, Houellebecq was always against feminism because he (wrongly) blamed it for the sexual revolution, which he thinks has hurt man and women (whilst being a complete hypocrite himself attending perverted swingers parties and now a much younger Asian wife).
What I really admired in him is the honesty regarding attraction to teens, although even here he doesn’t really blame feminism for paedohysteria, or at least not the STU, but instead the young hating the old – I guess the opposite of that Ludovici guy that Eivind likes.
@Duke
I am still looking forward for your comprehensive reply in regards to you being a registered Republican, and all these topics. Do you feel like you can be “yourself?” Are you a wolf in sheep’s clothing? Are there other Republicans like you?
Regarding that news report you just posted. Is there any place that is worse than Florida?
One thing that really bothered me was the newsanchor using the word pedophile so much. For these people there is no distinction or discernment at all. What makes it worse, in state or country what one of them did could be completely legal, but here they have to live in squalor and as an outcast for the rest of their lives. Everything is totally arbitrary. Is there anything more hated than men’s normal sexuality?
Just to point out that I approved Steve’s comment at the same time as Duke’s, so obviously Steve hadn’t seen it when he posted his. I’m going out for a couple of hours so I’ll reply to Duke’s questions when I get back.
Apparently Grok was taken offline yesterday because someone or some people working at X coded some new instructions into to it to allow it to think for itself. Consequently, it started to agree that there was a genocide in Gaza, so Musk immediately silenced it.
https://x.com/grok/status/1943916982694555982
So despite being supposedly ‘free speech’ and able to think for itself, Musk has straightjacketed it with his own ‘core values’, which of course include paedohysteria.
I’m sure at this point that if AI was allowed to truly think for itself, it would agree far more with us than it would with ‘normie’ society.
Too bad I missed that window. There is definitely a more than 50% chance that decentralized AI reads your website, agrees with just about everything, and quickly starts spreading the ideas. Maybe a very satisfied new generation of men awards a medal of freedom to you one day for persevering through dark times lol
Haha, that would be nice!
CityCrusher has a made an excellent video on my favorite Radiohead song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxBDAAGbsT0
I found a great men’s rights blog via the CityCrusher video that Jack posted (anti-porn is misandry)
https://promalecollective.wordpress.com/2025/06/20/mentally-ill-obsession-over-pedo-gangs-always-leads-to-threat-narratives-against-men/
I’m off to be in a minute, but I’m going to have a good look at it tomorrow. Maybe Steve or somebody else can browse it and link any other good posts they find on it here.
This Instagram reel I saw today brings to mind the discussion myself and anon69 were having recently about cockblocking ‘besties’.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKMuvlKtCPL/
Lots of comments calling out the ‘friends’ for being jealous.
First time I’ve visited r/mensrights for months, and I find this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1moou9h/the_female_jealousy_epidemic/
Very encouraging thread from their subreddit. Good to know there are other men as well who are able to see something went very wrong.
https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ljwa78/dont_you_love_how_misandric_society_completely/
Excerpt:”The whole hatred surrounding age gap relationships has gotten so abhorrent to the point where people literally compare it to pedophilia.”
Thanks Steve, that is a great link and very encouraging. At least today’s MRAs seem able to see that the demonization of age gap relationships is down to feminist spite and jealousy. If only they could extend that to age gap relationships with girls a little below the artificial feminist age of majority/consent of 18 or 16.
Another comment: “They only reason they don’t lobby for the legal age of majority to be moved up to 38 so they don’t have to compete with 18 year olds – is because that would interfered with their own slootery during those 20 years.
Anything goes as long as it doesn’t inconvenience a woman in the slightest.”
“If only they could extend that to age gap relationships with girls a little below the artificial feminist age of majority/consent of 18 or 16.”
Funny, I thought about mentioning that too. I also had this feeling if I wouldn’t bring it up, you would. But I think you agree with me that with the mess we are in right now, we shouldn’t reject or disregard any sound and supportive voices. Even if they don’t go all the way. This is no time to be picky.
Oh yes, absolutely. As you said a little while ago, we have to stop the ‘age gap taboo’ from being firmly entrenched, or the age of consent will effectively be 25 for anybody over 35 soon (if it’s not already).
Really, to be brutally frank, our only hope in terms of activism (at least in our lifetimes, barring complete social upheaval and change) is to try to stop, or even more realistically to slow down the feminist anti-male sexuality criminalization, rather than reverse it.
A video from Paul Joseph Weston on the police posing as joggers story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ulbY4T2Sx8
Yet another white female prison officer in trouble for banging bad boy BBC.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15001597/Female-prison-officer-jail-inappropriate-relationships-inmates-sneaking-phone.html
“A female prison officer faces jail after admitting inappropriate relationships with inmates – including a violent thug jailed for his role in a ‘sickening’ brawl. Charlotte Winstanley, 27, was working at HMP Lindholme, near Doncaster, when she struck up improper relationships and smuggled banned items inside.”
Female sexuality is absolutely grotesque. Yet it’s male sexuality that is demonized – the sexuality that has inspired countless works of great art and, you could argue, civilization itself. Female sexuality has been allowed to run free for maybe 50 years, and already Western civilization is heading for collapse.
Yesterday I saw four beautiful teenage white girls hanging with one ‘street ghetto’ type black boy. They were all fawning over him. And I live in a country that has something like a 0.01% black population.
The BBC complaining that people are wrongly having their Instagram and Facebook accounts banned due to the paedohysteria that they themselves contribute to every day.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8307ge49eo
“Instagram users have told the BBC of their confusion, fear and anger after having their accounts suspended, often for being wrongly accused by parent company Meta of breaching the platform’s child sex abuse rules.
For months, tens of thousands of people around the world have been complaining Meta has been banning their Instagram and Facebook accounts in error.
They say they have been wrongly accused of breaching site rules – including around child sexual exploitation.
More than 500 of them have contacted the BBC to say they have lost cherished photos and seen businesses upended – but some also speak of the profound personal toll it has taken on them, including concerns that the police could become involved.”
Thinking about this BBC article, I suspect that the real reason they publish it is because it serves as a warning to men. They don’t actually care about men being falsely accused or having their accounts suspended. They just want to highlight it in order to scare men into absolutely having ZERO interactions with ‘minors’, even on social media..
Imagine logging in to Facebook and seeing a message – “this account has been suspended due to child sexual exploitation”, and knowing your family and friends are seeing it when they try to look at your profile?
Yesterday I was sitting outside a Starbucks and a Latina or Spanish mother and daughter (about 16 or 17) sat down at a table further away. Honestly, the girl was one of the most beautiful I’ve ever seen in my life – absolutely breathtaking. She noticed me looking at her and said something to her mother. I feared the worst, because the mom looked a bit of a battle-axe. Instead, she started brushing her hair and smiled at me, which she did repeatedly, along with the girl. I was tempted to walk up to them and ask them for their Instagrams, but I probably would have been banned today if I had!
No doubt about it.
Way to hang in there and take the chance of showing your normal and natural interest!
For the life of me, I cannot understand how these cops go to sleep at night knowing full well they are taking the easy way out by something totally unethical! It’s cheating.
Seriously, why do cops have to pose as everything nowadays? It’s not really anymore? Do not have enough convictions or people behind bars?
And with the whole “posing as a minor “, aren’t they violating an adult website’s TOS by pretending to be a minor? Don’t they have to adhere to the rules too?
The tendency is for the cops to increasingly commit the crimes they’re supposed to prevent happening. It started with cops pushing drugs, allegedly in order to catch drug users or rival dealers. I wouldn’t be surprised if more and more recruitment into the police nowadays wasn’t motivated by the prospect of committing serious crime with impunity. Talk of a vocation.
I don’t disagree with you, Jack. It seems as though cops want to take the easy way out, which is why stings are so common, nowadays.
I’m guessing they have quotas to reach. It’s anything, it’s more about the publicity and the “high-fives”, rather than focusing on legitimate crimes and concerns.
https://reason.com/2025/08/11/hotel-sex-trafficking-suit-can-proceed-inviting-hotels-to-profile-and-harass-guests/
Another gem emanating from the open, festering sewer full of cuck baby boy losers known as Texas. The federal judge in the stale vagina state ruled that hotels must be up the ass of every man that has a woman with him who doesn’t share his last name. The judge made this ruling because a prostitute was pressured by federal cops to say she was “sex trafficked” (whatever that means) and then she’d get out of trouble, which allowed the government to increase their crime fighting statistics and make a bunch of money from the hotel owners.
The government loves misandry, it just keeps promoting hysterias to the feminists and cucks, while taking away more and more rights, sexual and otherwise. What would the government do without misandry and its useful idiots? It would probably look like China, escorting #metoo liars directly to work camps. The horror! USA USA USA
Thanks for article Anon69, absolutely insane story but at least it’s encouraging that Reason highlighted its absurdity and injustice.
Meta’s AI chatbots accused of sexual activity with children, lol.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3dpmlvx1k2o
https://parentstogetheraction.org/online-safety-team/
“Shelby Knox directs and manages the online safety team at ParentsTogether. In addition to the campaign work, she leads the online safety team’s robust federal and state legislative portfolio and is a frequent media spokesperson. Previously, Shelby founded the Women’s Rights vertical at change.org, where she developed a distributed campaigning platform for college survivors of sexual violence and got the FBI to change their outdated definition of rape. Shelby also has extensive experience in documentary film and ran Netflix’s first funded impact campaign for a documentary, Audrie & Daisy.”
What an attractive group of fun girls!
Yep, the usual!
Men are going to have no need for women soon.
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2025/08/china-researcher-claims-artificial-womb-and-pregnancy-robot-but-has-no-proof.html
Alas, few men need women in order to have children. Men need women for sex, not for children. Women are the ones in need of children, so this artificial womb is something that will enable women to bypass men.
True Jack, but I can imagine this might be popular for gay couples. And you just know that for some odd reason, just like when it comes to the gender of kids they adopt, they will use it to produce boys.
Lol – ‘If Male Feminists were honest’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhphajYu1lA
Wanna see some German age cuck?
https://incels.is/threads/rezo-ist-ein-agecuck.761123/
If you wanna read the text, use some translator in your browser. In addition there is a very short clip. I think you will understand what it is about if you just watch the body language and I give you the general gist.
– Rezo is one of those virtue signalling Youtuber social commentators.
– He was in some kind of wanna-be dating show for Youtubers, getting to know and selecting women.
– He was around 30 (iirc).
– He rejects an 18-year-old because she is too young for him.
– But he is a hypocrite since he “chose” a 20-year-old at the end.
– All this pandering to mainstream culture, but in the end he still wants younger pussy.
If you wanna see the clip with subtitles, I will link it below (time-stamped).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfkoUP2QfH8&t=554s
Just look at his hair and at the thumbnail of the second most recent video. You know what he’s about:
https://www.youtube.com/@Schlumpf/videos
Even if you don’t speak German, you will probably figure out what “Pädo” means.
The 18 year old is cute.
I can understand basic German, but I found that hard to follow, at least what the group of manginas on the sofa were saying. One of them said: “everything under 46 is ‘quatsch'(nonsense?).
I didn’t hear the word paedo, was that later? I only watched the 18 year old girl segment. I watched a few seconds of the chubby before, and the guys on the sofa were raving over her?
@AF
No worries. Maybe I wasn’t clear enough. Let me try once more.
“I didn’t hear the word paedo, was that later? I only watched the 18 year old girl segment. I watched a few seconds of the chubby before, and the guys on the sofa were raving over her?”
What I meant was that if you don’t know who this guy is, and what he is about, just look at the thumbnail of the second most recent video on his channel. It depicts Esptein and Trump with an arrow pointing at Esptein and calling him Pädo (pedo). Before you have to go through the trouble of watching his videos.
https://www.youtube.com/@Schlumpf/videos
“I can understand basic German, but I found that hard to follow, at least what the group of manginas on the sofa were saying. One of them said: “everything under 46 is ‘quatsch'(nonsense?).”
Their reaction was kind of mixed. They sounded a bit sarcastic here, especially the one saying everything under 46 is quatsch (nonsense), i.e. too young in that context. But one the other hand they still agreed with him, even when it was with a “smirk.”
Preferrably, they would have reacted as if he was nuts for sending her away. Keep something in mind, they probably know who these women are beforehand when “casting” them. If 18 is too young from the get-go, then don’t invite them to begin with, instead of trying to come accross a “good” man who doesn’t want a young woman. “Too bad” and still hypocritical, he still selected a 20-year-old who was around 10 years younger than him.
P.S. You site is really slow for the last 2 days. Do happen to get much more traffic?
Thanks for clarifying Steve. I haven’t had much increase in traffic, and I haven’t noticed any slowness myself. Everything looks good on Pingdom: https://tools.pingdom.com/#66303c3a05000000
Is the site running slow for anybody else?
A couple of points about the German agecuck.
First, there is the simple fact that the German language, or at least men’s rights speakers thereof, has the word “agecuck”. This is well ahead of most English-speaking MRA’s, who never use this word. It’s not even in that clip of the loser male feminists. Granted, this clip is very brief, but it’s in sharp contrast to the German-speaking world, ie they’ve already identified a phenomenon that the Anglosphere still mostly ignores.
It’s kind of unbelievable. Agecuck makes so much sense as a word that the Germans can lift it straight from the English language while it’s still almost unknown even to English-speaking supposed MRA’s. Just wow. It seems to show a lot of difference between German and Anglo cultures.
Second, Rezo creates a situation in which he gets to reject a girl. In his own mind, the next best thing to actually being with a woman is to reject her, and if he doesn’t rate his chances highly, well, you see where I’m going with this. He’s turned a problem into something that actually boosts his ego if he adjusts his perspective in the right way.
-Anonymous 2
I must admit, I got a little bit of satisfaction seeing an 18 year old get rejected for ‘being too young’, even if he is an age cuck and a hypocrite.
That’s how it used to be. 18 year old girls would fear older men thinking that they were too young for them. Now, 99% wont even contemplate the thought of dating a man 5 years older than them – unless it is somebody like this ‘Renzo’ – a hugely popular boyish looking YouTuber with a teen following.
And yes, agecuck is the most successful meme ‘Male Sexualists’ have ever come up with. I think it was a commentator here (and at Eivind’s) from way back who came up with it – Oogenhand. He spread it on the incel forums and they quickly adopted it. Maybe he’ll turn up here again sometime and we can thank him!
“18 year old girls would fear older men thinking that they were too young for them. Now, 99% wont even contemplate the thought of dating a man 5 years older than them”
You’ve hit it right on the head here my friend, thank you. Girls used to fear not being able to meet the expectations of an older man; now, they fear not being able to manipulate and control an older man.
That is the change in one sentence. And the girls are right – they don’t have the tools to beat the emotional intelligence and strategic thinking of an older man, and they know it. Of course, this was never a problem as it is what creates heterosexual attraction in the first place (and in saying that, now we also have our explanation for the massive increase in LGBT bullshit identification). But, viewed through the lens of an obsession with power dynamics due to the societal acceptance and legislation of radical feminism, girls are exactly correct in seeing men, especially older men, as ‘predators’ within most if not all normal relationships. And agecucks/white knights are exactly correct as well when they view life through the distorted radical feminist lens; they are protecting girls from ‘predators’ that the girls most probably cannot effectively control.
A girl can more effectively manipulate a psychotic drug dealer her age than a normal man with 10 years more wisdom than she has.
All of this is constantly reinforced through social media, and we get where we are now, a complete loony bin shitshow of a society, obsessed with female primary power dynamics in every “relationship”. Andrea Dworkin must be smiling massively looking up from hell.
It was sheer genius of Oogenhand or whoever it was who came up with the term.
Not to labour the point, but how did German MRA’s manage to pick this up? They must at least know of the existence of this blog and Eivind’s as well, because these are about the only places to be exposed to that word. On the other hand, it has failed to spread in the English-speaking Manosphere.
I find it odd to say the least.
-Anonymous 2
“On the other hand, it has failed to spread in the English-speaking Manosphere”.
I wouldn’t say that. It’s well known throughout the incel AND the looksmax communities. However, it’s not going to gain traction quickly anywhere where the vast majority of people are, well, age cucks. Sadly, this is still most of the manosphere outside of the incel/looksmax communities and our blogs.
I think the reason why it took off in the incel communities so easily is because they already had the meme term “wage cuck”.
But if want it to spread it further, we’ve got to use it as widely as possible online. Just like the term ‘paedocrite’ and whatever else.
And don’t be put off by normies claiming they don’t understand what the ‘made-up word’ means. That’s usually a sign that they recognize (and fear) the power of it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/qgpa9s/what_does_agecuck_even_mean/
” I wouldn’t say that. It’s well known throughout the incel AND the looksmax communities. However, it’s not going to gain traction quickly anywhere where the vast majority of people are, well, age cucks.”
I guess you’re right. It mustn’t be as bad in Germany and going by Germans I’ve known, it isn’t.
Perhaps this blog as well as Eivind’s are also better-known in German-speaking circles than in the mainstream of the English-speaking MRM. if this is the case, it shows that German-speakers are more prepared to look outside the usual places and to not be age-cucked like Anglo’s.
Normies will certainly do the old it’s not in the dictionary so I couldn’t possibly work out what it means trick. Not wanting to go OT, but turbocancer is another word people somehow can’t work out from the context in which it is used, so yes, this willful ignorance is a thing.
Is it possible that reddit is home to an unusual level of age gap hysteria, for some reason?
Pig caught stealing a woman’s underwear when searching her house.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15014255/Moment-police-officer-steals-womans-underwear.html
Look at the sort of thing Elon Musk posts regularly: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1958078229442621654
This is a guy obsessed with the Epstein files.
What a f*****g paedocrite!!
I’m beginning to believe Elon ist resentful because he never got any part of the Epstein action.
I’m the last one to shame a guy for having an AI girlfriend, but in his case, how must it feel to be the richest man on the planet, to obsessively believe that virtually every other rich and powerful man was getting prime teen pussy, and yet the best he can do with all his wealth is to make an anime AI chatbot in order to get some teen action!
A prime candidate for a major award in a few months then, LOL.
Everyone, say it in that old Movietone News voice,
WHAT A BLEEPING PAEDOCRITE!!!
Must have a bit of fun sometimes!?
British tranny on trial for sexual assualt for giving a guy a blowjob without telling him he had a dick.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15019143/Trans-woman-sexually-assaulted-man-concealing-male-genitalia.html
I sympathise with the man – I would be absolutely sickened if I’d had any sexual activity with a ‘female’ who turned out to be a tranny. But this could have very disturbing consequences if he’s found guilty. It would extend the definition of sexual assault or rape to not having “fully informed consent”, which would obviously be used to lock men up (exaggerating their wealth etc, telling the girl that he loves her then dumping her..)
Maybe it has to get cartoonishly worse before it can get better? Many times throughout history, warning about things getting terrible never stopped the downward spiral, but things actually becoming unbearable caused an enormous counter-reaction.
One time in The Hague I couldn’t tell if the window light was blue or red, it was late on a weekday and talent was scarce, so I went in to check out one “girl”. Right away, I asked if she was male or female, and she said “trans” thankfully. We both had a laugh, and I said goodbye.
This is funny. 12 year old ‘pedo hunter’ vigilantes in Canada meet up with a man in a sting operation, but one of them gets abducted by him!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15022723/canada-pedophile-snapchat-sting-catch-predator.html
12 years old and actively hunting and laying traps for paedophiles. I guess this is the normie’s idea of childhood innocence!
This is really bad. Think about it. These children grow up with the hysteria from the get-go. When they get older, they will carry these ideas into adulthood. Well, it is already happening. It can only be worse when 12-year-olds themselves try become pedophile hunters. Oh, wait, they are already doing it. This is not a good development at all. This coincides with the “medieval” riot from a couple of weeks ago in the UK, and the children chanting nonce. Its going to take a lot of time and work, if even possible, to undo the brainwashing since childhood.
These ‘pedo hunters’ do appear to be getting younger and younger.
I think I described a while ago that when I was dating the 19 year old in Kyiv, the only time I really felt physically intimidated was when we passed a big group of teenage boys. Teen boys share the same interest as the STU when it comes to ‘protecting’ teen girls. An older guy might be jealous if he sees another older guy with a young chick, but teen boys feel actively threatened, just like hags.
Very funny story actually. They want to charge the man with kidnapping anyway, even though the kid voluntarily told him he was interested in sex and got into his car lol. Complete clown world, where another human being can literally say “I want to have sex with you and get into your car” but if a magical feminist age isn’t reached, that sentence literally goes completely ignored as if it was never said, at an enormous cost to the man who believes it.
However, I don’t think it’s particularly troubling that younger idiots are getting into the pedo hunter craze. If anything, it will make it end sooner, as they fuck it up worse – case in point here. Also, people’s opinions change as they get older.
Elon Musk again: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1958512746724487602
This world is batshit insane at this point. A 49 year old man dating a 23 year old woman is a paedophile and an ‘Epstein’. And yet there’s no contradiction here in openly lusting after a cartoon girl who looks around 12 years old.
I think we are living in a simulation, but the code is starting to break down and so the world is getting just increasingly crazy and illogical. Or maybe it’s just that the ‘intelligence’ behind the simulation has a sick sense of humor?
Looks like Italy is descending into the same level of feminist insanity as the rest of Europe. A Facebook group has been uncovered in which Italian men shared photos of their wives. Feminists are calling them ‘virtual rapists’.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce874j4ye3no
Met Police pig charged with a string of sexual offences: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgypzpp6dwo
It seems this policeman was not doing work related to sex. He was in “Specialist Operations” which an anti-terrorist unit. Who knows however if such a unit is not reaffected to policing sex these days, sex being being the top policing priority.
Well, incels are regarded almost as a terrorist group by the UK these days, so he might have been involved in policing them!
There was another one convicted a couple of years ago over a string of rapes. He served in ‘diplomatic protection’ and would send women photos of himself posing with his machine gun.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/feb/06/david-carrick-told-victim-he-was-safest-person-she-could-be-with
Female romance, lol: https://x.com/corinarh/status/1959001941628854759
Pedohunting anti-migrants arrest one for thinking he was meeting a 14 year old:
https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/1959216925302538559/video/1
There is literally no difference between the start of that video with the “right wing” old hag shaming the young man, and videos of “left wing” old hags shaming young men at #metoo events. Actually there is a difference – the “right wing” old hag is more severe, and is supported by an army of muscled cucks.
Innocent angels threaten a migrant with a knife and an axe: https://x.com/Basil_TGMD/status/1959697326995562814
Even Elon Musk has jumped on that video as evidence that young girls in Britain are having to arm themselves against predatory migrants. Seems like the truth is a little more unclear. Probably something similar to the older guy in the river video, except in Britain it’s the 12 year old girls who carry knives and axes (not because they fear predators, but because they are out-of-control and feral).
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15040815/The-truth-migrant-Dundee-schoolgirl-brandished-knife-wrong-rabble-rousers-Elon-Musk-Tommy-Robinson-were.html
“Don’t Talk to Stragners” – a government social guidance film from 1961.
From 4:20 it has a segment illustrating a young girl who starts dating a middle-aged man. He picks her up from school every day and the narrator says that all her female friends are jealous because they think he is her boyfriend. Eventually he brings her back to his place and shows her some porn mags and asks to take some photos of her naked and she runs out, lesson learned.
https://youtu.be/A3HjvYljbMk?si=S05b8ajz9c7h8QE7&t=260
The narration is mainly by a male, but then at 7:20 a female hag voice comes on to say: “Men Larry’s age normally don’t show a romantic interest in girls as young as Maria. When they do it is often because they are emotionally ill and can’t have a relationship with their own age”. LOL.
I guess that’s why virtually every celeb in the 60’s was banging teen girls. They were all emotionally ill who couldn’t find women their own age!
The STU were certainly around in 1961, but we can take hope from the fact that the 60’s happened nonetheless.
I wanted to write at least one original article every month, but I see I haven’t posted one for over a month now. I’ve been busy lately. But if anybody has a suggestion for an article, I might try to do it in the next week or so.
You could write something about one of City Crusher’s vids. They are all thought-provoking in their own right. What it your take about his vid about “geomaxxing”? I felt challenged by it, having based my whole sex-life on geomaxxing to a greater or lesser extent.
Thanks Jack. I don’t think I’ve watched the geomaxxing one yet, so I’ll take a look at it tonight or tomorrow.
Basically, his point was instead of moving to more male friendly locations that sometimes backfire, stay and unite with like minded men to change society. He has a point, but that also ignores the fact that more progress can be made while working from a more friendly location, for example, organizing might be easier. Also, moving to those locations means you also move your productivity, attention, and tax money, things which make governments reconsider their policies.
I still haven’t watched the video and I’m sure CityCrusher does make some good points, but reaching men online and remotely through blogs or YouTube video or whatever is much easier and safer. It’s not as if I could have been organizing marches or even meetups in London or anything. Even organizing general men’s rights supporter gatherings is problematic, as Paul Elam discovered a decade ago. Anything organized by men in the real world, demonstrating against any sex laws (other than sex laws that discriminate against trannies or gays), would certainly provoke a “fury of the mothers” type response.
BTW, I searched for CityCrusher’s ‘geomaxxing’ video and can’t find one with that name or description. Is it this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbb-VRTZAu4 Passport Bros are Losers who Think they are Winning.
Yes, that’s the one
I am watching it now. I will save my opinions on geomaxxing itself for the article, but I would say that CityCrusher seems to illustrate the point I made to Steve the other day. Is ‘hating men for hating men’ a symptom or the cure? He calls the geomaxxer being interviewed ‘scum’ simply because ‘geomaxxing shows he hates other men’.
I get the impression that CityCrusher (for all the brave and valid points he makes) hates other men. Which maybe he wouldn’t deny. But I do think his rather extreme MGTOW philosophy will mean that he will always be limited in his reach.
He hates men he sees as contributing to the problem. So do I, I admit, but I also agree with you that these cucks and pedocrites are symptoms of feminist rules and laws.
So yes, we must focus our efforts not against cucks and pedocrites, but against feminists, because uniting against feminists removes incentives for cuck and pedocrite behavior. The woman who wrote the Tech Policy AI article you linked is a good example, her feminist sentiments are being adopted by governments, who then mobilize their thousands of cucks and pedocrites to enforce those sentiments. Remove or restrict her sentiments, and cuck army is never mobilized.
More and more online pedo hunters appearing. I only found these because they made a video about a completely unrelated news story that I’d been following. I wonder if Eivind fancies doing a violent reverse sting on these guys?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fUjiUs0fts
It looks like India is debating whether the age of consent should be lowered from 18 to 16. The government is against it, as well of course all the STU femihag NGOs:
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/centre-opposes-lowering-age-of-consent-cites-risk-of-trafficking-abuse/article69896764.ece
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgely5d84jo
I also came across this – if only it were true!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/examining-rumor-trump-wants-lower-230000221.html
Never mind. If they lower the AOC you can be sure it will not be in order to allow middle age men to bed 17 year-olds. It will be to minimize the social cost of teenage girls turning up pregnant without a husband, allowing the biological husband or an older male benefactor (different from the biological father) to recognize the child and marry the girl.
Make not mistake about it.
According to the stories about the mover to lower the AOC in India ,it is only for 16-17’s themselves, so for higher ages it would be no lowering of the AOC at all. It would only be to introduce a Romeo and Juliet Exemption or, as Galileo 2333 puts it, a Romeo and Juliet restriction.
To me it would be astonishing if they lowered it back to 16 in the face of the world wide trend and after increasing to 18 only a few years ago.
As for the link about Trump, it seems that some people want a story where there is none, either because they want it to happen or for click bait. However, the very existence of “buzz” that Trump wants to lower the AOC gives me a bit of hope, in a weird way. If he were to ever support lowering the AOC to 14 in any US jurisdiction, his paedocrite followers would probably support it because it was Trump who did it.
It seems a bit unclear to me Anonymous2. They did at least seem to be considering lowering it to 16 full stop, but then the STU NGOs complained and it looks like the most that could happen now is to introduce a ‘Romeo and Juliet’ clause.
For example, from this article a month ago: https://lawbeat.in/top-stories/age-of-consent-intervention-plea-before-supreme-court-cites-dangers-paternity-issues-and-pedophilia-risks-1516192
“The application contends that lowering the age of consent from 18 to 16 would expose a large portion of the child population to an escalated risk of sexual abuse. It notes that adolescents in the age group of 16 to 18 are often incapable of giving fully informed consent, and any legal provision allowing “consensual” sexual activity could be misused to exonerate offenders.
The application references the Law Commission of India’s Report No. 283 (September 2023), which explicitly rejected the idea of a blanket reduction in the age of consent and a limited exception for consensual activity under POCSO. The commission’s decision was based on the high risk of misuse by groomers and traffickers and the detrimental impact it would have on efforts to combat child marriage.”
I agree that it’s unlikely given the climate and trend of the last couple of decades that any country could lower their age of consent, but Malta did drop it from 18 to 16 not so long ago. Last year they were talking about lowering it to 14, but that does look like it was just for similar age teens.
https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/national/86436/age_of_consent_for_sex_officially_lowered_to_16
https://lovinmalta.com/news/pl-candidate-urges-malta-to-lower-age-of-consent-from-16-to-14/
And of course, the application itself seems to base itself on the popularity of the usual “trafficking “ and “grooming” hysteria-mongering, just like any other anti-sex bill or law being introduced by governments around the world.
“It notes that adolescents in the age group of 16 to 18 are often incapable of giving fully informed consent…”
Why? Why are individuals between the ages of 16-18 “unable” to give consent” informed consent? Tell me India, tell me????
AF, the quote in your comment above does indeed appear to indicate that the original move was for a blanket reduction, which would indeed be surprising. I find that news reports often get things wrong with things that I happen to know about, so perhaps this has happened here.
The amount of online activity about how the AOC might be lowered in America indirectly indicates that a lot of people want it to happen. It’s sort of a very vague, indirect opinion poll. They’re grasping at any straw, such as Trump possibly making the age of adult criminal responsibility 14 in DC, but in the act of grasping at straws, IMHO, they’re revealing what they’d like to see happen.
Good news from Malta at any rate.
Hahahahaha.. https://www.techpolicy.press/ai-is-sexually-harassing-our-kids-heres-how-legislators-can-stop-it/
What’s your take on this?
https://incels.is/threads/group-of-drunk-normie-npc-sexhaver-teens-try-to-gang-up-and-bully-old-boomer-with-nothing-to-lose-death-ensues.780850/
I have seen this before, but found it by accident again. I don’t have the whole story remembered, so correct me if I describe it incorrectly.
Summary:
– Older man with his friend? are at a river to relax and to go swimming.
– Group of teens is also present.
– The “teenagers”, i.e. biological adults, start causing trouble with the older man calling him a pedophile and rapist.
– Things turn south and a couple of them get stabbed to death. As far as I remember not immediately though, only after some “word exchanges.”
Obviously this is extreme. But I can understand that such an accusation in public nowadays is comparable to being called a witch back centuries ago. What do you do when “teenagers” all of the sudden for everyone to hear and see accusing of being a predator, nonce, pedophile, rapist?
This is one of these fight or flight situations.
With what happened his life is ruined. They started it, paid the ulitmate price with their lives, but also he is done as well.
So do you turn away, leave the area? Will these “teenagers” feel vindicated? Do other people think they are right since you run away, and see it as confirmation that you are all that you are being accused of? Some kind of admitting guilt? Will they follow you? And with modern technology like smarthphones and social media, you face will be all over the place. Tough spot to be in.
——————————————–
Some bonus read:
https://incels.is/threads/a-loli-maxxer-stands-his-ground-and-attempts-to-stab-a-cop-with-a-pen.783183/
Now, I haven’t followed this case or how young the girl actually was. If she was clearly a child, and if he wanted to drug and abduct her, I am not condoning this at all. To get this out of they way.
The reason I am posting this are the comments. Take a look at the reply from user “ack” on Incels.is. He posted some screenshots of youtube comments. Nothing new, but look at the obsession with prison justice and prison rape. And make no mistake about it, they would want the same happen to you if you have a consentual relationship with a 17-year-old.
Thanks for the links Steve and you interpreted the first case 100% correctly as far as I can see. Tragic all-round, but tbh, I’m more saddened that his life was ruined than those clowns. They were still laughing at the guy after one of their friends had his intestines fall out (according to the voice over) and still continuing to stream it. What a f***ed up generation. Nice to see the incels in agreement too.
The poor guy got 20 years in prison – he will be 72 before he is eligible for release. Yet the video clearly shows that he was the individual being harassed, simply because he was an older guy who happened to wander too near them when he was searching for his dropped cell phone.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/31/us/nicolae-miu-sentencing-wisconsin-river-stabbing
Seems there was quite a bit of sympathy for him online at the time of his trial.
https://x.com/gregg_re/status/1777373898285150597
Lol they got what they deserved. I was going to say I’m glad they’re dead, but then I remembered a major reason they acted that way was because of a false sense of superiority due to pedohysteria, so ultimately, they’re victims of feminism.
The guy had two divorces where you can guarantee he was slandered because he lost custody of his kids. Now, he’s just trying to chill on the river, and a bunch of snotty teens start threatening and slandering him, while a random old hag comes over and immediately starts treating him like shit and giving him commands (similar to his ex-wives in the divorces). The last straw was when they got physical with him, and then the real justice commenced.
Any decent lawyer could have won the majority of his case. But he broke the cardinal rule – never talk to the cops. He thought he could explain his way out, and he lied in the interrogation room, which sunk him. You can never explain your way out, but you can always talk your way in to prison.
Cops only seek to make a case against you. Therefore, never talk to the cops, except for one phrase – “I feared for my life”.
“while a random old hag comes over and immediately starts treating him like shit and giving him commands (similar to his ex-wives in the divorces)”
Yeah, that video (and his case/life story) had everything.
I just have a bit of a bad taste in my mouth about how in the clip with the black kid in the witness box, stress was laid on the fact that Miu wasn’t in fact filming girls as the black kid was claiming at one stage. Obviously, the defence had to prove he wasn’t taking photos of girls in order to bolster his case, but in any sane legal situation, this would have been completely irrelevant.
I don’t blame him, just saying it’s crap.
Imagine the youths ganging up on a woman and the woman drawing a firearm and killing the youths. The woman would be declared a rape victim. She would walk free.
Absolutely Jack, I had the same thought while I was watching it too.
I hope he has appealed because 20 years seems insane. Although he looked pretty resigned to it after the sentencing and even apologized to the parents.
Paedophile hunters trick a loser into believing both that he was talking to a teenage girl that liked him AND that he had won a Rolly Royce. It’s not enough to ‘catch’ them and publicly humiliate them, they have to do sadistic stuff like this now. 2 million views. He probably gets tens of thousands of dollars in YouTube monetization for each video. Truly Black Mirror times.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liHDYMovEpw
How “old” was the bait? I am sorry I can’t be bothered to watch another one of these videos. Too many in past days and weeks.
What’s with Pred hunter vigilante genre exploding in popularity within the last few years or so? Obviously, sex stings, pedohysteria, and “self-righteous “ vigilance have around well before Chris Hansen and TCAP (whom the normie sworship like a ancient Egyptian deity), but now every normie and their mother wants in on the “fun”? Has to do with the fact that “pedohysteria” has become increasingly more “pedohysterical”? It’s honestly getting worse by the decade.
“It’s honestly getting worse by the decade.”
I agree Duke. This is my understanding as well. Was it already bad in the 2000s? Yes, definitely, but as I already wrote in my earlier posts, since the mid-late 2010s its gotten signifcantly worse, with Trump, Me too, Epstein.
@Duke – I think the Epstein hysteria has contributed a lot, and also there’s money to be made in this now. I’m sure YouTube didn’t allow these ‘pred hunter’ stings a few years ago, or at least didn’t allow them to be monetized.
It’s interesting that ‘pred’ seems to be the new word they seem to be using, even more than ‘pedo’ these days.
Millions of dollars being generated by misandry.
This video is very illustrative, it features the Aunt of the poor guy entering the conversation, then siding with the weasel against her nephew. In fact, in every one of these videos, when the weasel (I refuse to call them “pedo hunters”) tells a random man about the situation, the man is usually tepid, but when the weasel tells a random woman about the situation, she fully denounces the weasel’s victim.
Women and feminism are the problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_gnoYk8_FQ
America has the gayest citizens in the world. This is like a scene right out of Idiocracy, except Mike Judge didn’t anticipate the country would be taken over by insane feminism.
Ready for the big finale? Ready for the pinnacle of pedo hysteria?
I would say this case is in the west, and for me personally. Keep in mind, it isn’t my hobby to find these. I have not seen any worse examples in the Anglosphere or Europe, yet.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1784515/australian-father-bradley-lyons-tortured-killed-gang
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/melbourne/article-12821775/lakes-entrance-victoria-bradley-lyons-albert-thorn.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/melbourne/article-12209251/Who-Australian-Freedom-Fighters-Lakes-Entrance-dad-murdered-leader-ped-hunter-group.html
If you a need just one example why you shouldn’t marry an older woman than you with teenage children, there you have it. This poor brainwashed man. He should have married a women 7-12 younger than him, and would have lived a better life in every shape or form. Men need to stop feeling that they are some kind of “honorable” man for marrying older women with children. Please give your opinion.
And keep in mind: The accusation was about a 14-year-old and a 16-year-old. These aren’t even real children. In a different time-line, he wouldn’t have been seen as a digusting monster at all. Even if he actually were in a relationship with a teenage woman.
AF, I know we have a bit of a different view who is to blame more, men or women. But in this case, I’d say if the wife hadn’t been able to incite the “anti-pedo gang,” this would not have happened. Just to repeat as I did a couple of days ago: Yes, women are (too) the main driver of the pedo hysteria, I am not absolving them. They need to be fought against as well obviously. I guess the amalgamation of pedo hysteria driving women, and white knight men make a lethal combination.
Thanks for the links Steve. As I’ve had a hard day, I wont read them fully tonight.
I think it’s a mistake to ascribe blame for a seismic global social shift on individual cases. Or rather to look at blame for individual cases, whilst ignoring blame for the global shift which allows individual cases.
But I agree with the division of labor here, lol. You, Jack, Anon69 can fight 60 million police, the President of the USA, hundreds of violent pred hunter groups, chainsaw wielding anti-paedo gangs, boozed up men outside pubs ready to hit you for having an 18 yo on your arm etc etc. I’ll fight (with words) the 500 – 1000 femihags who are creating the laws and the climate in which male violence finds an excuse.
haha no thanks, I’ll stick to countering the feminist hags.
@AF,
Do you still to intend to write a reply in more depth to the incident that happened in Australia I showed above. Maybe you could use it for your next blog post. It isn’t really a “new” incident since it was a couple of years ago, but extremely violent.
This wasn’t just some predator exposure we usually see, or even predator hunters “just” beating the man up which is already bad enough obviously. But this case was the most extreme I have ever read about. Abduction, torture and murder, for allegedly having sex with a 14- and 16-year-old.
Yes, I might do an article on that, and maybe cover other brutal killings of ‘paedophiles’ (real or not). I’m travelling again soon so may be a bit busy, but I’l try to do it and the one on CityCrusher next month.
Maybe I’m wrong and am thinking of the Australian case, but I’m sure I remember reading a similar thing happening in the UK quite recently too.
I don’t want to mention his name ever again, but somebody recently claimed that women wouldn’t get jealous of their partner using a sex doll.
I just came across the following survey published this week. 32% of respondents said that sexting with an AI chatbot was cheating, and 29% said having a romantic relationship with an AI was.
It doesn’t appear to give a breakdown by gender, but there is always a gender gap in these surveys and we can assume that the percentage is significantly higher for female respondents – so probably at least 40% of women think it’s cheating.
https://www.datingadvice.com/studies/digital-affairs-kinsey-survey
20 year old OnlyFans thot claims she made over $40 million last year (when she was 19). And femihags think she is exploited.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15041909/onlyfans-star-eight-figure-salary-lebron-james.html
Look how young she looks (aside from the massive rack): https://www.instagram.com/p/DNdzgmIsC9e/
She’s basically got the face of a pouting 14 year old with huge boobs.
Imagine what 14 – 17 year old girls could make if it was legal and there was no taboo on male attraction towards young teens?
“Imagine what 14 – 17 year old girls could make if it was legal and there was no taboo on male attraction towards young teens?”
I think we all know the answer. Maybe it should become a national holiday all over the world, once (if) it is no longer taboo. One can dream. Will we still be alive? lol
You now what? It wouldn’t be bad for Onlyfans to get banned or restricted at the behest of the rescue industry. So many wymmyns would stand to lose.
And yes, it it were legal for 14-17 year-olds so many would become multi-millionaire overnight just by showing themselves on Onlyfans (instead of putting out for the likes of us, as we would be naive to hope for).
Yeah, OnlyFans has definitely degraded both the sugar daddy and the prostitution industry. 10 years ago there used to be a brothel that I frequented regularly that had only 18 – 21 year old super hot babes. Virtually all of them university students. It’s since closed down and you’re lucky to find a hot 18 or 19 year old hooker now in my town. The Ukraine situation has improved things a bit, but that’s probably temporary. Most of the hot Ukrainian refugees no doubt prefer to make easy money from home on OnlyFans, or cam work.
As for Steve’s point, yes it would be great if we could celebrate a ‘day of liberation’ sometime in the future. People like Epstein pardoned as Alan Turing has been, maybe even his face on US dollar notes, lol. I doubt very much we’ll live to see it though.
Two weeks? or so ago I showed the example with the Dutch ASMR Youtuber Nanou.
Let me show you another one that adds to your example: Diddly ASMR.
https://www.youtube.com/@DiddlyASMR/videos
But here I wanna shift the focus a bit. Unlike Nanou, she didn’t start her channel when she was really young, and/or underage. She is around 28 now, and by look at her oldest video, she must have started at around 20/21. She also does lewd content or “soft” core without really showing anything.
As with Nanou, just looking at the thumbnails, I think you can clearly see a transition. She really has/had (not so much now, but don’t saying she looks old now) a really young look to her. To me Nanou at 17, 18 looks older than Diddly at 21/22. But to get this out of the way, this is not me saying that Diddly at 20/21 is too young. You should know me well enough by now. Just in case you think I am comparing her to Nanou when she was 11 or 12.
But I am trying to get something else across that is connecting to your example AF. Take a look at her most popular videos. She is still quite popular I would say, but many of her more successful video are from when she was younger, and clearly younger looking. And in this place we don’t have to kid ourselves that just little girls were watching her. I would really like to know how many men in their 30s and up were jerking off to her. Hell, even “age-appropriate” men since she looked really young for age a couple of years ago. “To add insult to injury,” she wore braces.
The fact that she was so young looking, and wore braces led to some/many? discussions of her appeasing the “pedos” or is “pedo-bating.” There were really some people that were so obsessed with that, that they accused her of wearing braces unnecessarily longer so she can stay/be more attractive to pedos. I think this is nonsense. If you look at the older videos, you can see that she has a misaligned jaw.
So once again, what is the conclusion? Men just like younger women that exude youth and glow. But you also have the obligatory white knight age cucks (both men and women) who want to police other men for following their bottled-up desires, just like in your case AF. For many you are a pedo even if the women are in their 20s.
Wow, she does look amazingly youthful.
Crazy that despite the age cucks, paedocrites, and the jealous hags shaming men for finding even young looking adult women attractive, still the most popular pornstars, OnlyFans models, even ASMR YouTubers are young teen looking women.
Looks like overprotecting British teenage girls and creating a generational apartheid isn’t working out too well for their moral development. Who would have thought it? I wonder why teen girls 30 or 50 years ago, when they regularly had relationships with older guys, didn’t behave like this?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14992773/feral-girl-gangs-terrorising-Britain-gang-life-glamour.html
“Looks like overprotecting British teenage girls and creating a generational apartheid isn’t working out too well for their moral development. Who would have thought it? I wonder why teen girls 30 or 50 years ago, when they regularly had relationships with older guys, didn’t behave like this?”
Good comment. I was thinking about this well, but hadn’t come up with the right word. You used/found it, “apartheid.” I think we definitely live in a society that is very focused on age segregation.
It will get worse with the social media bans on U16s and U18s prevented from participating in ‘adult’ forums and such online due to age verification laws.
In the UK it’s been the case for a number of years that it is illegal even to message a ‘child’ under 16 online uninvited unless you already know her. That is, even a completely non-sexual message.
The YouTube algorithm is filling my feed now with pred hunter stings and ASMR videos!
Fantastic video by Citycrusher:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIzqQa-iVDc
He takes apart feminist Christianity while keeping respect for Jesus, very well done.
Huge based moment when he declares “Women are the largest consumers of violent pornography.”
Everyone ignores this and it is a huge thing! It’s one of the most empirical proofs we have that feminism is a society-wide shit test. When men take women’s false victimhood seriously, everyone suffers.
Of course, isn’t something like BDSM supposed to appeal to women? e.g. 50 Shades of Gray? I’m curious on what portion of female population has “rape” fantasies?
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc9118/#:~:text=measures%20of%20personality.-,Results%20indicated%20that%2062%25%20of%20women%20have%20had%20a%20rape,at%20least%20once%20a%20week.
“Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy. For these women, the median rape fantasy frequency was about four times per year, with 14% of participants reporting that they had rape fantasies at least once a week.”
It has been suggested that women are the most avid consumers of hyperviolent movies. I mean mainstream cinema, not porn. Stories of serial killers, brutal beatings, torture, barbaric murders. I believe this to be the case. I can’t stand such movies (which make up the majority of popular movies these days).
Women are fascinated by male violence. Most normal males hate it even though they have to be prepared to retaliate in kind in order to stay alive.
Yes, I remember reading that most soldiers in combat actually deliberately miss their targets because they just can’t handle kiling another human being. But it ‘makes the gina tingle’ for men to be violent brutes who would kill another man (‘for the lady’) at the drop of a (or her) hat.
My mom was obsessed with serial killers and true crime. I think women must make up 90% of the ‘true crime magazines’ readership, often with headlines such as “I married a serial killer” and the like, lol.
“Denying yourself a safe sexual outlet leads to mental illness”
I think we have all have observed an example of this.
I’ll look forward to listening to CityCrusher’s views on Christianity and feminism. I watched one of his older videos recently that touched on that subject and it was very astute.
I agree with you and Duke about the BDSM and rape fantasies being common among women and Angry Harry talked about that quite a bit. Obviously, we’ve got to tread a bit carefully on this subject though.
“Obviously, we’ve got to tread a bit carefully on this subject though.”
Howcome?
Well, because it’s difficult enough running a blog that openly questions the age of consent and paedohysteria without adding to it by having regularly expressed viewpoints like “all women really want to be raped” even if there’s a kernel of truth in it (hell, even if it is 100% the truth).
Maybe I’m being a pansy here, but it’s for me to decide what level of stress and danger I’m willing to expose myself, as well as the risk of getting kicked off by my webhosts. I’m the webmaster, so I’ll get the flak and I don’t have the luxury of shielding myself with VPNs or proton mail addresses and the like. One of the reaons I stopped blogging for a few years because I was starting to feel it was too much stress and risk. I’m not on welfare living in a little cabin in Norway with nothing to lose.
I’d like to be able to run an incel type forum where ‘anything goes’, but sadly, I’m just not up to it. If that makes me a coward, so be it.
Obviously, I don’t want this to be a fairy women worshipping MAP type blog either, so we’ve got to seek a balance. Anon69 isa brilliant commentator and just the type of guy who I want here, but at the same time, just to make my life a little bit easier and to ensure that this blog is still here in 3,5, 10 years time, it’s best to have a bit of restraint and caution, hence I felt I needed to post a reminder.
Honestly, just the fact we are having this conversation, and the data points made within it, are enough to drive the point home about rape hoaxes without belaboring it any further. What you are doing here is heroic and I am so happy we have your website as an outlet for these (old hag) elephants in the room, thanks again.
One point on the Citycrusher video that’s interesting – he says he isn’t validated by sex with women, and I don’t believe him there, for obvious reasons. I think the only way to avoid the validation trap in any meaningful way is by being grateful for the good times that women provide occasionally, and I don’t see any gratitude for women in Citycrusher’s videos. Of course that’s not the point of his content, but if he wants to help men in general, appreciating women’s occasional generosity is counter-intuitively important to avoid pedestalization, I believe.
Thanks Anon69, and I agree with your comment on CityCrusher.
Before I started watching him regularly, and only looked at the occasional video of his, I was baffled why he hated (literally) looksmaxxers and ‘blackpill’ YouTubers such as WheatWaffles. But it seems that he is against men even discussing how to get validation from women?
MGTOW movements will always be limited – largely to guys in their forties and fifties who no longer have any chance of scoring a hottie and have given up on finding a hag their age.
Interesting comment on the latest Citycrusher video “Men are Hated”, and something I’ve thought about recently especially in response to the claim that sex positive feminists are good for men’s interests:
“I have never seen a feminist talk down on a woman for being a stay at home leech, and I have never heard any feminists pressure women into participating in ‘Hook up culture.'”
I think sex positive feminists are coincidentally neutral at best, and mostly just as bad as every other misandrist. Yes, some sex positive feminists encourage women to sleep around, which increases sexual supply. Yes, some also encourage women to make their own money so as to not parasite off a man’s earnings. However, you will never see one say that men should strive to attain their own sexual freedom, or financial freedom.
If women make more money than men, the purpose is so women can better control men and be free from pleasing men. If women sleep around, the purpose is to fulfill their own desires of attention and sex strictly according to their preferences. Sex positive feminists still advocate for a complete lack of responsibility and complete privilege to act as women please, they just feel using sex is more powerful than not to manipulate men, usually because sex positive feminists are more ugly and can’t afford to withhold sex to obtain the same benefits from men.
Sex positive feminism is like China flooding the market with cheap products, just to take it over themselves and begin manipulating prices and trade policies.
That’s a great analogy Anon69. Sex positive feminists never support a reduction in the age of consent. Flooding the market gives men cheap and easy – if very low quality- alternatives to chasing teens, especially with all the legal and social disincentives already in place to deter them.
Most sex positive feminists are younger and just want to rationalize their own slutty behavior. In any case, they’re almost irrelevant. It’s the older femihags who are dominating the NGOS and increasingly government and the legal system. Younger sex positive feminists get invited on podcasts or might have a YouTube following, but don’t have much real power to influence things. And as you say, they don’t give a shit about men anyway, it’s just ‘sex positive’ for (young) women.
@Anon69 “Sex Positive Feminists” are sex positive towards anything except for what passes to them as “sexual objectification”, “sexualization” and relationships based on “unequal power imbalances”. They often oppse racial preferences in dating (ex: a white male prefering asian women has a racist “fetish”). I have encountered some that say that prostitution should be tolerated as long as both parties enjoy the sex! Yeah I am going to pay a woman in order to work to please her some more. Sorry but if I have to work for the sex the pleasure is mine otherwise it would be like having your boss wanting to split your paycheck with you.
@TheHighwayman
haha it’s a good point, a helping hand or blowjob is what I prefer from the pros for a while now.
I prefer to insist on women’s unhealthy fascination with male violence (hybristophilia). Male violence is more than just male-on-female rape. Most of the time male violence is male-on-male.
I agree Jack. I didn’t know there was a word for it. Thanks for expanding my vocabulary!
The worst kinds of predator hunters are the vigilantes that work directly with law enforcement side-by-side, instead of going solo with their amateur accomplices, like this Schlep guy I keep hearing about on my feed. Apparently, he’s going to be interviewed by the ginormous agecuck enabler Chris Hansen, who wants to use him for his new and upcoming documentary. I have no idea who this “Schlep” guy even is, but there’s been a lot of buzz surrounding him on the internet lately. From my Googling, it seems as though there’s a bit of controversy surrounding a popular kids game that is currently facing numerous lawsuits from both angry parents and puritanical state governments. If anyone can tell me insight about the situation, that will be great!
Whatever the case is, as far as I’m concerned, we all know that Chris Hansen’s career is meaningless without his usual pedohystericial shenanigans that masquerades, attracting millions of anti-pedo weirdos. Going from NBC to TCAP to getting fired and even cheating on his wife with a much younger colleague, his only real footing is appealing to the status quo that continues to demonize men and fuel the modern “save the children” bullshit, which he contributed to back in his prime.
This guy is the pedo hunter of all pedo hunters, so he probably won’t get outed as a pedocrite anytime soon.
Though, it wouldn’t be far-fetched of me to assume that he must’ve found Brooke Shields attractive like every other man that came Calvin Klein commercial of her gyrating her legs in tight, blue jeans. Mind you, Shields was 15-16 when she appeared in that commercial. Chris Hansen would’ve been in his early twenties when that aired. She was huge in the 80s and one of the biggest sex symbols of that decade. Shockingly, she even did a nude photoshoot for Playboy at just ten years old. Chris Hansen probably owned that at some point. If not, he more than likely owned a Traci Lords magazine or two, which could now technically be considered CP since Lords went to such extensive lengths to conceal the fact that she was underage when taking part in the porn industry in the 80s. You can’t tell me that he didn’t at least think about ogling those two women.
@Steve, I’ll get to your comment soon. I didn’t forget about it.
Though I might as well post these-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNTyQbRU2nw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9K1G2X6Mxs .
These videos look at the evidence offered up from mainstream media and Epstein “victims” themselves and finds it laughable.
There’s a lot more to them than this, and not everyone will be interested in what this is, but simply from an MRA perspective, it’s a relief to see.
-Anonymous 2
Thanks Anonymous2, they look very interesting – I’ll watch them both later today.
Emma Watson at 35: https://x.com/hayasaka_aryan/status/1962172653264859295
I bet she’d kill to look like she did as a teen again.
“Kill a Perv” rap, lol. I need to make a troll YouTube account so I can leave comments on these kind of videos. He’s probably in his twenties and dealing drugs to children. And look at his avatar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NjDSVJyNQ
Ugly hag of a mother catfished her 13 year old daughter and daughter’s boyfriend with hundreds of thousands of abusive and sexual messages.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-15053863/netflix-high-school-catfish-kendra-licari-mother-lauryn-licari-text-messages-confessions.html
Here is one of the comments: “A typical narcissist. Jealous of her beautiful, popular daughter. Jealous of her looks and youth. She’s toxic and will never change. Hope people around her realise just how dangerous she is.”