Antagonist Debunks the Idea of “Ephebophilia”

Our friend Antagonist has produced a brilliant and comprehensive debunking of “ephebophilia” and hence the “ephebophile’ label which so many misguided and autistic individuals embrace as a proud badge of identity. In fact, as Antagonist shows, “ephebophilia” originated as a description of homosexual (pederast) behaviour and has been more recently been taken up by quacks who seek to pathologize normal male sexual attraction to fertile teen girls. Here is his post in full.

No Such Thing Exists As “Ephebophilia” Exists Among Straight Males

“Ephebophilia” does not exist as a chronophilia among straight men. For practical purposes, i will say that it does not exist all.

It is what used to be an obscure term for homosexual faggots (see below), but due to political correctness (rejection of gendered language, egalitarianism) and wikipedia’s misinformation (whether it’s due to negligence or deliberate), has led to it being used as a gender-neutral term. It is actually commonly used by seemingly anti-agecuck voices but the usage of this absurd term actually doesn’t help their agenda at all.

it is completely natural for straight men of any age to find women of childbearing ages attractive. The term is falsely used to label male reproductive sexuality as a fringe deviation to reinforce to appease the hylic masses and reinforce the feminist “age of consent” legislature (that is designed to destroy traditional family structures and lower the birthrate).

The origin of the term

While the Wikipedia article for “Ephebophilia” never explicitly mentions that the word only applies to homophiliacs (“homosexuals”), reading between the lines and paying even a little attention, along with using your brain leads to the crystal clear conclusion that it is indeed a term that could logically apply to homophilic behaviour.

Right away, the main picture on the wiki page shows a visual representation of pederasty in Greece (homophilia).

Just like many other terms in this psychiatry, the term is made-up of greek words.

Ephebos  = a term for a male adolescent in Ancient Greece.

While the “philia” suffix (meaning love) is usually used to denote various paraphilic disorders.

How would a term that directly translates to “attraction to young men” ever mean sexual attraction to 15-19 to year olds, including females? Spoiler: It doesn’t.

As you can see, literature from a little over 40 years ago clearly defines it as a sexual attraction to young males. Note that this literature is from the 1980s, this is important because before the 1970s, there was no need to use this term at all since homosexuality (or how it’s more appropriately called homophilia) was classified as a mental disorder already.

Before that, the term was used by pro-homosexual activists as a positive label for themselves including Magnus Hirschfeld in the first half of the 20th century and later by dutch pro-pederasty/homosexuality activist Frits Bernard in the 1950s.

Then, the term was then later revived by Ray Blanchard in it’s new absurd form to mean “sexual attraction to 15-19 year olds”. The same guy also wanted to introduce “hebephilia” as an entry in the DSM, thankfully the proposal was rejected. It’s clear that he has a pro “age of consent” political agenda in mind and is willing to rewrite evolutionary science in his attempt to further said agenda. The modern definition, that is used by Wikipedia, agecucks and incompetent anti-agecucks stems from his “research”.

To recap:

•  The word uses greek words that refer to it’s origin as a term for only homosexual behaviour
• The complete origins of the term are murky
• At some point, the word was used by pro-homosexual voices as a term for themselves
• When homosexuality became legal, it was used as a term for homosexuals who were attracted to men younger than socially/legally acceptable.
• Ray Blanchard created a new gender-neutral definition for the word and popularized it to further the agecuck agenda.
• Misleading terms such as these help the feminist agecuck agenda

The modern definition of the word didn’t arise from genuine research into human sexual behaviour, it was created to reflect the already existing unfounded biases in American society and an attempt to give them “a scientific basis”.

Misleading terms such as these help the feminist agecuck agenda

The modern definition of the word didn’t arise from genuine research into human sexual behaviour, it was created to reflect the already existing unfounded biases in American society and an attempt to give them “a scientific basis”.

Many anti-agecucks sadly keep using the false definiton of this homosexual disorder in debate. For example when falsely accused of pedophilia by an agecuck for finding a pubescent/postpubescent female attractive, the uneducated non-agecuck may respond with “Actually, It’s not pedophilia, it’s actually ephebophilia” :feelstastyman:

This is problematic because it makes natural male sexuality seem like a fringe disorder. Finding any female who is well into puberty attractive is NOT a paraphilia, it’s natural and the default for every healthy heterosexual male.

It’s also important to mention that neither “hebephilia” or “ephebophilia” has been classified as a psychiatric disorder by any reputable diagnosis manual, meaning that it’s not even recognized, the only reason why the word is so frequently used in the first place is because of the Wikipedia articles that exist about it.

Finding fertile women attractive is not deviant. The feminists want you to believe that it is.

 

https://incels.is/threads/no-such-thing-as-ephebophilia-exists-among-straight-males.892460/