David Futrelle has infamously defended the gay sex shop distribution of a paedophile made ‘classic’ child torture movie featuring real and naked 14 year old boys ‘acting’ in a film in which they are made to eat excrement, anally raped, tortured and murdered. No surpises there. After all, Futrelle is simply following in the footsteps of other notable male feminists such as Kyle Payne, jailed for sexually assaulting a sleeping schoolgirl who was in his care and then again for downloading kiddy porn, and Hugo Schwyzer, a sex predator who admits that he once tried to murder his girlfriend.
What is more disturbing, is that many MHRAs share Futrelle’s sick views on videos of naked children being tortured being rented out in gay sex shops.
Over a 20 year period, Futrelle has steadfastly refused to apologise for his defence of Salo and continues to justify the film’s sale in a gay porn store on the grounds that, obscenely, the sick movie can be viewed on Netflix and YouTube. This is a man who has gone on record to claim that a picture of a 17 year old girl in jeans is clearly ‘child porn’ in the context of a ‘jailbait’ subreddit or forum and that those who view such legal pictures are ‘paedophiles’.
Of course, many so-called MHRAs share Futrelle’s feminist views on the definition of child porn, as well as the feminist age of consent, or at least publicly claim to do so, whatever their disturbing motivations are. Laws which in the UK and elsewhere are currently leading to witch hunts against men, a spike in the male suicide rate, and the undermining of any semblance of justice. However, even more disturbingly, many of them appear to share Futrelle’s views on the distribution in a gay sex shop of a movie that graphically depicts nothing else but the torture, rape, and murder of naked children. A movie directed by a man who turned to filmmaking after losing his job as a teacher due to molesting the children, and who was infamous for handpicking beautiful young 14 and 15 year old boys to star in his movies and immediately embarking upon sexual affairs with them.
Last night I had yet another MHRA leave a comment on this site denouncing us as ‘pedobears’ for admitting what every man knows – that teenage girls can be sexy – and for attacking the logic of the feminist age of consent laws that are leading to a clear sexual holocaust against men, things that any real supporter of men’s rights should do. The same MHRA, like several others, made a point of defending SALO and, by implication, Futrelle’s support for the movie’s sale in a gay sex shop. Unfortunately, this MHRA was too cowardly to leave his regular handle, but several others have not been so shy and have openly supported a gay child torture porn movie both here and elsewhere in the MRM. I thought it would be useful to start compiling a list of MHRA child torture porn apologists here. This will be a sticky page, and I’ll update it regularly as these staunch defenders of the rights of boys continue to support the idea of gay men fapping off to naked 14 year boys being anally raped and then made to eat their abuser’s shit before being tortured slowly to death.
I must make it clear that not all MHRAs support Futrelle over the ‘right’ of gay men to rent videos of naked underage boys being raped and murdered in gay porn shops. In fact, a small minority have actually spoken out and attacked Futrelle over the matter. Janet Bloomfield (JudgyBitch) obviously stands out, to her eternal credit. And Paul Elam and Dean Esmay themselves, have also condemned Futrelle a couple of times, as they should (in fact, they should be a little louder).
Let’s start with our old friend ‘Kloo2Yoo’.
Kloo2Yoo (former moderator of r/mensrights). The clueless subhuman paedocrite Kloo2Yoo once reported a men’s rights redditor to the FBI for uploading a famous photograph that has appeared on Hallmarks cards to the men’s rights subreddit. Consisting of the image of a little girl lifting up her skirt to a bewitched little boy, with a caption that said something along the lines of ‘with this I will have power over you always’. It was clearly a relevant men’s rights image and any sane rational person without something disturbing to hide would see it as such. But not Kloo2Yoo, who immediately denounced it as child porn and claimed to have reported to the FBI the MRA who posted the link to the picture.
After the low IQ Kloo2Yoo finally realised he was out of his depth running the fast growing men’s rights subreddit, and handed over moderation rights to slightly more competent paedocrites, he seemed to disappear for a number of years. I assumed that the obvious hardcore paedocrite had been locked up, but no, he turned up out of the blue just at the moment we had David Futrelle on the rack over his defence of SALO, and proceeded to leave a rant in the comments section here defending it as a ‘classic’ art film. This is a man who reported an MRA to the FBI for linking to a Hallmark image with obvious men’s rights relevance. This is a man who banned anyone from the men’s rights reddit for questioning feminist child porn laws that jail men for looking at pictures of ‘young looking’ fairies and elves. This is a man who supported Futrelle in claiming that legal images of fully clothed teens can constitute ‘child porn’ if they are viewed in a ‘sexual context’, and yet, like Futrelle, he sees no problem in the distribution of a movie in a gay sex shop featuring nothing but naked children being raped, tortured, made to eat human faeces, disembowelled, and murdered.
Perhaps ‘pedobears’ isn’t quite the right word for these MHRA child torture porn apologist freaks. Perhaps not even ‘paedocrites’. Maybe ‘pedowolves’, or ‘pedopsychos’, ”pedosnakes’, ‘pedofreaks’, or simply ‘real sadistic paedophile sickos’?
Uchuu – ‘Uchuu’ is another sick MHRA freak who has taken issue with the esteemed JudgyBitch for daring to call out David Futrelle over his defence of gay paedophile torture porn.
Meh, after reading a summary and some background on the movie, the link rather reads like character assassination. Don’t get me wrong, I so far have nothing good to say about Futrelle, but the movie apparently had just as many female victims as male ones (so, the focus on the “boys” of the article seems dishonest), it wasn’t actually documented child abuse, but something fictional, and I’ve seen no real good argument connecting that one suicide to the filming of the movie. The contents are disgusting enough that I never want to see it, but supposedly it actually has some artistic qualities, so the free speech argument is not completely out of the blue.
Notice, in this one small paragraph, how ‘Uchuu’ resembles so many other child torture porn apologists, both MHRAs and Futrelle groupies. The idea that, because the movie contained naked 14 year old girls being slowly tortured to death, as well as boys, Futrelle’s defence of its distribution in a gay sex shop is not a men’s rights issue. His defence of the movie as ‘artistic’ (not sure how he feels about the fact that, technically, men in Europe could be jailed by feminists for simply reading Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita). Finally, note his love of manga, revealed by his username, no doubt of the hardcore violent rape variety that involves pre-pubescent girls.