https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54930488

A Dutch police chief has called for an end to “paedophile hunting” after a 73-year-old retired teacher was beaten up by teenagers and died of his injuries.

Oscar Dros said there was a risk more people could die and he appealed for justice to be left to the authorities.

The man from the eastern city of Arnhem was lured into having sexual contact with a minor while in a gay chatroom.

As I mentioned the other day, there doesn’t seem much point carrying on the struggle, at least not in this form. We lost. We tried our best…or at least I did…but we’ve lost. One in 4 billion men with balls and fists can’t do much alone.

I had realistic hopes when starting this blog. We were never going to defeat feminism or crush anti-sex and paedo hysterias. The aim was to show that many of us were men enough to raise our fists in defiance. At least point out who the enemy were – the femihags. Perhaps, optimistically, with the growing manosphere and more specifically the men’s rights movement at our side, we could slow the pace of legislation and hatred, until such time as society changed fundamentally (in my optimistic hope – the world of eternal youth and sex rationally divorced entirely from reproduction), that the underlying reasons for the hysterias would dissipate.

But the truth is, it was clear before very long that we didn’t have a chance. I’m not going to compose another essay in what went wrong, but /r/mensrights, Paul Elam, the ‘Honey Badgers’ etc, and the general American puritanical stupidity took over what might have been a secular, pro male sexuality men’s rights movement in the style of Angry Harry, Steve Moxon, or any number of British writers on men’s rights who had gone before.

I visited reddit/com/r/mensrights for the first time in years the other day. The first post at the top of the page was, of course, a story about a female teacher getting a short sentence for banging a lucky teen lad, and the consequent outrage from MRA arseholes in the comments section. One of them actually said something close to ‘equal injustice for all’, as a thing to be proud of (‘the fight for justice is equal’ or such). I almost threw up. I doubt if the story on the Dutch teacher being beaten to death by anti-paedophile vigilantes was even posted (what has this to do with men’s rights dude?).

The only thing that remains is for digital archaologists in the year 3,000, probably Chinese or Turkish or something like that, to uncover our writings, and conclude as evidence that there was some defiance in that brief, inexplicable period of terminal decline of the West, when trannies were held up as normal and attraction to fertile youth was the worst perversion imaginable.

But there’s really no hope of that. They certainly wont call it the ‘Male Sexualist Movement’, taken over as it has by paedophile activists, MAPs, feminists, and other anti-porn puritans.

I stated the other day that the only good thing about Eivind’s blog is that he does allow comments still. Of course, it’s rapidly being taken over by the aspie paedophiles and MAPs that he chooses to ally himself with (and then clumsily distance himself from). One such creature claimed I have been proven mistaken in my opposition to feminism all along, because Judith Levine has got a new book out, and Ruth Ginsburg wanted to lower the age of consent to 12.

Well, well, well. I guess that totally overrides the fact that the vast majority of the countless NGO members working day and night to further increase the odds of creatures like him to be raped in prison (not to mention ordinary people like you and me), are hardcore feminists. Not to mention that the age of consent was raised from 12 to 16 or 18 in the West by feminists, and today, they have raised the age at which a girl is automatically assumed to have been raped, no matter how willing she engaged in sex, to 13 (in the UK) or 15 (in France). In fact, this aspie paedophile actually thinks that Ruth Ginsburg, who implemented that feminist treaty into law in the USA (or tried to) – raising the threshold to 12 – actually meant that I’m a fool for not getting behind her and her fellow feminists.

As I wrote a while ago when the bitch croaked :

The words above may upset the several followers of Eivind Berge’s ‘MAP NO FAP’ movement (I will not mention Eivind again in this post), given that Ruth was a feminist, and the alt-right pedocrites have been quick (while taking a break from fapping to anime 8 year old girl pics) to promote nonsense viral memes suggesting she wanted to lower the age of consent. In fact, she was simply arguing for the case (pushed by feminists on a global level and now introduced worldwide) for sex with under 12’s to be automatically considered rape, no matter however willing. Indeed, she also stressed that this and other age of consent laws should apply equally to women having sex with boys. So maybe Eivind and his MAPs wont be a fan of her’s after all (O.K., I lied about not mentioning Eivind again), although MRA paedocrites will.

What I remember most strikingly about Ruth Ginsburg is her quote soon after taking up her role, of comparing sex offenders to a virus that ‘needs to be eradicated’. In the feminist Sexual Holocaust against men, this evil cunt has certainly been one of the leading players.

As for Judith Levine, great she’s got a new book out. Probably the only book she could sell, given that her name is permanently associated with her first one (the excellent ‘Harmful to Minors’). To say that she, or Camille Pagilia, somehow prove that feminists are our natural allies instead of the enemy, is like saying that MRAs believe that women should be allowed to have sex with 12 year old boys because of Eivind Berge’s writings.