Ms Pashley said: “We have a very simple school uniform, which we enforce strictly.
“On one occasion when a male member of staff challenged a female student on her skirt length, she retorted, ‘You shouldn’t be looking at my legs’.
“The male member of staff was understandably uncomfortable with this and reported it to me immediately. Male staff asked me to share this incident with the governing body when uniform was reviewed.”
But the parents of some of the jailbait schoolgirls aren’t too happy and have complained of double standards :
Another parent claimed that female staff at the school fail to set a good example. She said: “Some female staff wear high heels, short skirts and low-cut blouses.
Are they going to be wearing trousers?” The online protest petition says parents should have the right to buy school trousers or skirts without logos from whichever retailer they see fit.
Some parents even claim that preventing girls wearing skirts is a breach of their human rights.
I’ve just returned to my apartment alone after 8 hours in the pleasant company of a 20 year old, admittedly young looking Russian cutie that I’d stopped in the street two days ago. Despite numerous IOIs and strong hints that she wanted to sleep with me, including her telling me that I could stay at her place in Moscow if I visit that city later this year, I couldn’t pull the trigger and ask her to come home with me. Why? Because we’d been creep shamed and commented on all day, and I’m only human. We walked by a herd of repulsive fat Ameriskanks and one of them remarked loudly ‘He’s WAY too old for her’. We passed a group of pot bellied Englishmen supping beer outside a pub and one of them exclaimed, after leering at my companion, – ‘How the fuck did he pull that?’ He then started clapping, in apparent admiration, and one or two of his mates joined in the snarky fun. More seriously, in a restaurant we ate at, the entire staff continously gave us the evil eye – I wouldn’t be surprised if the bastards had pissed in her soup.
The funny thing is Krauser would have likely taken her up the arse in a Starbucks toilet within a couple of hours of opening her…and nobody would have batted an eye either.
According to scientists at several international universities, including Oxford,
‘paedophiles’ have more in common with crabs than they do with you and me genetics may play as much as a 40% role in the criminal actions of sex offenders.
The researchers looked at the perpetrators of sex offences in Sweden between 1973 and 2009 and found that male relatives of offenders were also more likely to be convicted of sex offences.
Note that prior to 2009, sex offences in Sweden consisted almost entirely of violent rapes and assaults. Since 2009, a raft of feminist laws have broadened the definitions of rape, as well as the definitions of illegal pornography and of what constitutes ‘possession’ of illegal pornography.
For example, in 1973 hardcore child pornography was fully legal in Sweden and sold openly in newsagents etc. Since 2009, as in most Western countries, men can now be jailed for up to two years for simply having one picture of a cartoon schoolgirl wearing a short skirt passing through his internet browser for less than a second.
The majority of ‘sex offenders’ being sentenced today in European countries are white middle-class men who have been caught looking at ‘indecent’ pictures of teenage girls on the internet. The other group consists mainly of muslim and/or black immigrant males convicted of violent rape. A third group exists almost excusively in the UK and that consists of elderly white men convicted of ‘historic abuse’, which supposedly took place decades ago when the offences were only technically illegal and rarely investigated let alone prosecuted by the police of the day. ‘Historic abuse’ hysteria will likely happen in most European countries following the lead of the UK.
Thus most sex offences, and likely ‘sex offenders’ today, are very different from those in the timeframe of the study.
Whether or not the ‘study’ has any scientific validity, the publishing of it, and the widespread coverage of it in the media, is another step towards the coming inevitable Sexual Holocaust that will likely claim millions of male victims at the hands of feminist Sexual Trade Union. For a liquidation of a minority to take place, it is necessary for the state to convince its populace of the ‘fact’ that the ‘subhumans’ are such by nature.
For this reason it has been included in the new page I have set up here : Timeline of the Sexual Holocaust
Feel free to suggest any notable events past and present that I should include in the Timeline.
DJ Neil Fox explains on behalf of a fictional ‘child protection charity’ that ‘paedophiles have more in common genetically with crabs than they do with you and me’. Fox is now awaiting trial for sexually assaulting children as young as 11.
*Note also that it could be argued (but wont) the idea that sex offenders are genetically so takes away the main justification for a number of feminist sex laws, such as those against viewing illegal porn (the idea being that ‘demand creates the supply’. If sex offenders viewing illegal porn are genetically determined to do so, then laws wont stop them or the demand.)
Cue the inevitable angry YouTube paedocrite comments below the video.
A scientific study has found that maltreatment by adults leaves less mental scars on children than bullying from peers.
Yawn. I’ve always thought it beyond ridiculous the feminist idea that ‘sexual abuse’, which is rarely done with the deliberate intention of inflicting harm, and of course under feminist inflated definitions is usually willingly engaged in by the supposed ‘child victim’, can be as or greater damaging psychologically than bullying, which is 100% directly psychologically abusive and performed entirely with the intention of causing mental harm and distress.
And this ties in even with the findings of the NSPCC itself, the world’s most powerful
Sexual Trade Union lobbying group ‘Child Protection’ society, that bullying is indeed easily the biggest problem facing children, and the thing that children themselves are most concerned about (despite paedohysteria).
These findings shouldn’t surrise anyone, but what would be a huge surprise is if the Sexual Trade Union Child Protection Industry started devoting more than 5% of their resources on combatting childhood bullying rather than spending 95% of their billions on promoting paedohysteria and the demonization of men and fathers as sexual and physical abusers of children.
Oh, and btw IQ 70 MHRAs – perhaps you bunch of clowns should take note of it too.
A new study published in The Lancet Psychiatry shows that children who have been bullied by peers suffer worse in the longer term than those who have been maltreated by adults.
The research is led by Professor Dieter Wolke from Warwick’s Department of Psychology and Warwick Medical School. The study is due to be presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) annual meeting in San Diego on Tuesday 28 April.
There is already an established link between maltreatment by adults and the mental health consequences for children. Professor Wolke and his team wanted to examine whether long-term mental health issues among victims of bullying were related to having been maltreated by adults as well.
They looked at data from 4,026 participants in the UK ALSPAC study (Avon Longtitudinal Study of Parents and Children) and 1,273 participants from the US Great Smoky Mountain Study.
For ALSPAC they looked at reports of maltreatment between the ages of 8 weeks and 8.6 years; bullying at ages 8, 10 and 13; and mental health outcomes at age 18. Data from the Great Smoky Mountain Study had reports of maltreatment and bullying between the ages of 9 and 16, and mental health outcomes from 19-25 years old.
Professor Wolke said: “The mental health outcomes we were looking for included anxiety, depression or suicidal tendencies. Our results showed those who were bullied were more likely to suffer from mental health problems than those who were maltreated. Being both bullied and maltreated also increased the risk of overall mental health problems, anxiety and depression in both groups.”
The boss of a protein powder company, who is facing a backlash over a controversial poster featuring a bikini-clad woman, has labelled campaigners as terrorists.
The advert for meal replacement supplements featured on London Underground billboards shows a blonde woman in a yellow bikini, beside the tagline: “Are you beach body ready”?
Feminist campaigners, who have launched a Change.Org petition to see the adverts removed, have slammed them for “targeting individuals, aiming to make them feel physically inferior to the unrealistic body image of the bronzed model, in order to sell their product.”
There are interesting cultural differences between Americans and Japanese. Americans fear the Terminator movie scenario of a robot or Artificial intelligence apacolypse. However, Japan is facing sharp population decrease from lowering birth rates. This could be accelerated with more realistic sexbots that extend the Japanese sex doll industry. This is part of Japan’s greater cultural acceptance of robots where they think that robots will like Astroboy or the manga fembots or the bots that care for the elderly.
The Japanese sex doll industry is reaching new levels with the release of a new line of dolls, which claims to be more genuine than ever. The dolls, which are made of rubber and silicon, were described in a video as having realistic feeling skin and authentic looking eyes and hair.