Post at Reddit on the absurdity and danger of pushing the 1 in 6 boys abused statistic

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2u6r4e/is_it_possible_and_is_it_dangerous_for_fellow/

I think all of us agree that the ‘1 in 6′ women have been raped statistic is a lie based upon feminist junk science, false reporting, and obscenely inflated definitions of rape/assault.
Yet at the same time it seems that a lot of MRAs actually do believe the ‘1 in 6′ men/boys statistic is true and ‘proudly’ trumpet it as a fact that is all too sadly ignored by society.

I assume the rationale is that at the moment extreme positions are taken on female and male victims of ‘assault’ (one is taken excessively seriously, the other not at all) and that if MRAs push both (seemingly contradictory) viewpoints, society might take a more balanced position (i.e. both men and women are victims at a much more realistic rate – 1 in 25 or whatever).
However, it does seem that a lot of MRAs genuinely do believe the 1 in 6 figure when it comes to male abuse victims.
Whether this statistic is genuinely believed or not, do MRAs recognise that promoting such a statistic could be dangerous in the context of the current feminist sex hysteria and legislative creep which is leading to prisons overcrowding with (male) ‘sex offenders’? Do MRAs recognise that, even if it is not the intention, pushing the 1 in 6 males abused figure might simply validate the feminist 1 in 6 females abused figure?

For example, British men will soon have to ‘prove’ that a woman they had sex with consented, otherwise they could be convicted of rape.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11375667/Men-must-prove-a-woman-said-Yes-under-tough-new-rape-rules.html

How exactly does promoting the view that sex abuse and rape is rampant in society put an end to such feminist legislative creep or the number of men being put in prison?

The danger is especially real given that sites like AVoiceforMen take in donations on the back of campaigns to ‘promote awareness’ of ‘male abuse victims’ using the 1 in 6 statistic. MRAs such as AngryHarry have correctly identified the financial profit driven greed that lies at the heart of the feminist abuse industry : http://www.angryharry.com/esFeedingTheAbuseIndustry.htm

It is also important that all MRAs who promote the 1 in 6 statistic on male sex abuse victims should be aware that it comes itself from feminist junk science which included definitions of ‘non-contact’ sexual abuse. The feminist ‘researchers’ were actually trying to link ‘masculinity’ with sexual abuse. Furthermore, the promoter of the statistic through the much celebrated website http://1in6.org – Jim Hopper – himself is a proponent of the now completely discredited ‘false memory’ syndrome which has destroyed the lives of thousands of men around the world.

These are his (Jim Hopper’s) words :

Amnesia for childhood sexual abuse is a condition. The existence of this condition is beyond dispute. Repression is merely one explanation – often a confusing and misleading one –
for what causes the condition of amnesia. Some people sexually abused in childhood will have periods of amnesia for their abuse, followed by experiences of delayed recall.

http://www.jimhopper.com/memory/

Finally, around half of male victims of sexual abuse are abused by other men i.e. homosexuals. If you believe that 1 in 6 boys are sexually abused, then you believe that 1 in 12 boys are sexually abused by homosexuals. That’s a lot of homosexuals supposedly abusing boys, an idea that seems to me to contradict the ‘liberal progressive’ and inclusive ideals of AVforM with regard to the homosexual community.

See also : http://theantifeminist.com/1in6-org-equality-of-injustice-stupid/

Steve Moxon – ‘Page three’ exploited MEN, not women; and the ‘campaign’ was a risible femascist own-goal

http://stevemoxon.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/page-three-exploited-men-not-women-and.html

Talk about shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted ….. and then discovering the horse to be a mule. ‘Page three’ is irrelevant against the tsunami of free internet porn vids. Getting rid of ‘page three’ ends an exploitation of men, not of women. Men were charged for a newspaper for which their main interest was a single still of a woman’s boobs. Nowadays there’s an infinite array of actually moving images of a lot more than just boobs and it’s ALL FOR FREE. The complainants today about the Sun’s apparent move are hardly male consumers …. they’re the ‘page three’ models themselves. They deeply resent feminist authoritarians telling them that they can’t freely choose to flaunt their bodies to make a living by exploiting men. What is feminism for, they point out, if not to give women wider choices? How can feminism be about narrowing women’s choices? They may well ask.
Of course, actually the Sun’s move has nothing whatsoever to do with feminists’ lame, frankly comic – frankly risible — campaigning. On the very contrary, the femascists were great publicity for the Sun. Like the suffragettes, their upper-middle/upper-class numptie counterparts a century before them, they were key to keeping going the very thing they were campaigning against! They did everything bar marching working-class blokes into the newsagents to show their solidarity by even more assiduously buying the rag. Self-evidently, Rupert Murdoch has long realised that an image on newsprint paper is very low-quality, and no match for the high-res images on-line – an orgy of boobs and more will continue there in the online edition of The Sun, just as before. ‘Page three’ was a rather embarrassing anachronism in the new internet digital world, rendering the Sun very ‘yesterday’ in context. It wasn’t an embarrassing anachronism as femascists see it.
The femascists can’t even get Germaine Greer on-side on this one (as re many of their airhead campaigns). On C4 News she insisted she’d never called for banning ‘page three’. She was never in any position to, having famously plastered herself in ‘wide-open-beaver’ shot on the front cover of a magazine in the 1970s! Harriet Harpy-twat was hilariously ambushed on the programme between Germaine and a young model.
And so is starkly illuminated the hapless idiocy of contemporary feminism with its split on every issue. In the pithy words of a popular Youtube vid: ‘Feminism .…. Make your fucking mind up’.

Anna Mato Voted Elizabeth Bathory Femihag of the Year 2014

It’s official – Anna Mato has the dubious honour of winning the first ever Elizabeth Bathory Femihag of the Year award!

Who was the worst FemiHag of 2014?

  • Anna Mato (29%, 12 Votes)
  • Alison Saunders (26%, 11 Votes)
  • David Futrelle (26%, 11 Votes)
  • Harriet Harmen (24%, 10 Votes)
  • Jessica Valenti (12%, 5 Votes)
  • Fiona MacTaggart (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Rebecca Roache (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Rashida Manjoo (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Kat Banyard (2%, 1 Votes)
  • Somaly Mam (2%, 1 Votes)
  • Carolina Criado-Perez (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 42

Loading ... Loading ...

Elizabeth Bathory was a 16th century Hungarian middle-aged countess whose insane sexual jealousy led her to sadistically torture and murder hundreds of beautiful young girls. According to legend, she also believed that the blood of 14 year old girls would help her restore her lost sexual power over men, oh sorry, ‘paedophiles’.

ana-matoIt’s fitting therefore that the first ever Elizabeth Bathory award goes to Anna Mato, former minister for health in Spain, who before being sacked for serious financial corruption offences, almost single-handedly raised the age of consent above even that suggested by fellow femi-hags in the United Nations and her own government. The hideous Mato shamelessly exploited the tragic murder of a 13 year old girl by her older lover to introduce legislation that will raise her own sexual market value, as well as that of millions of other Spanish women, but will lead to thousands of young girls being psychologically tortured by the Spanish state and abuse industry, as well as thousands of Spanish men to be anally raped and beaten in prison.

Besides those obvious consequences, the legislation is likely to erode the once famous intergenerational harmony and respect that existed in Spain and lead to the inevitable ugly and toxic generational apartheid that now exists in the UK (which, incidentally, has a child murder rate four times as high as Spain, as well as the highest number of teen suicides and self-harm incidents in the developed world).

A truly worthy winner who Elizabeth Bathory herself would be proud of.

FDA Approves Stem Cell Cosmetic Rejuvenation Clinical Trial

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150112005853/en/FDA-Approves-Antria-Phase-2-Stem-Cell

Clinical research company Antria, Inc. today announced that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the next step in medical research to help patients look younger using their own stem cells.

Antria is the first company to gain FDA approval to initiate Phase 2 clinical trials with autologous adipose derived stem cells (ADSC) for plastic surgery. Antria completed the first phase of research in May 2014, which showed promising results.

“ADSCs are one of most promising avenues of medical research to use the stem cells of patients to create a more natural, longer-lasting youthful look than traditional cosmetic surgery,” said Dr. Leonard Maliver, chief executive officer of Antria…

Antria’s patent-pending process uses liposuction to extract the patient’s own fat. Within one hour, stem cells are prepared from that material. Clinicians then inject the stems cells under the patient’s facial skin to reduce the appearance of wrinkles, scars and sagging skin.

FemiHag of the Year 2014 – Reader’s Poll

Here it is – the long awaited first ever FemiHag of the Year Award – and YOU decide! which of the following candidates do you think was the most despicable femihag of 2014? Which aesthetically challenged feminist went to the most evil and obscene lengths to raise her own pitiful sexual market value? Which feminist did the most to introduce legislation that will lead to thousands or millions of men being anally raped in jail, just so that she could increase her own chances of getting laid or keeping her man? Which bitter feminist jellyhag brought us closer to a sexual holocaust in 2014?

You can choose TWO femihags – scroll down for a brief resume of each femihag (WARNING – Does contain images that will leave some readers requiring brain bleach to remove) :

Who was the worst FemiHag of 2014?

  • Anna Mato (29%, 12 Votes)
  • Alison Saunders (26%, 11 Votes)
  • David Futrelle (26%, 11 Votes)
  • Harriet Harmen (24%, 10 Votes)
  • Jessica Valenti (12%, 5 Votes)
  • Fiona MacTaggart (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Rebecca Roache (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Rashida Manjoo (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Kat Banyard (2%, 1 Votes)
  • Somaly Mam (2%, 1 Votes)
  • Carolina Criado-Perez (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 42

Loading ... Loading ...

Rashida-Manjoo_bbc-sexismRashida Manjoo…possibly the ugliest feminist jellyhag in the world, the evil Manjoo, United Nations something or other, declared that the UK was the most sexist in the world because of its sexualisation of 17 year old, ermmm, ‘children’…meanwhile, in ISIS controlled Iraq and Syria, thousands of Christian pre-pubescent girls are being raped and tortured by Islamic neckbeards and neither the UN nor feminists do anything.

Alison SaundersAlison Saunders – Unspeakably evil director of the UK Crown Prosecution Service, leading the persecution of elderly men through Operation Yewtree.

ana-matoAnna Mato, the Spanish femihag minister who single-handedly raised the age of consent in Spain, even beyond the age suggested by her colleagues and the United Femihag Nations itself, and was then caught up in scandals involving Ebola and serious financial corruption.

david-futrelle-manboobz-3David Futrelle – The Chicago child torture porn apologist gets a chance for redemption after his humiliating defeat in the Paedocrite of the Year poll! The only male feminist in the world who is such a truly disgusting mangina that he actually qualifies as a femihag. In 2014, Futrelle posed as a male feminist media expert on the dangers of granting that boys have moral and legal rights whilst continuing to defend the gay sex shop distribution of a paedophile made ‘classic’ depicting naked 14 year old boys being anally raped, tortured, made to eat human excrement, then disembowelled and killed. He then publicly called for me to be murdered after I revealed that one of his regular commentators was a pervert who ran a forum dedicated to fellow perverts into the crucifixion of women and girls.

caroline-criado-perezCarolina Criado-Perez – Started the year strongly and couldn’t be kept out of the media, even having twitter trolls arrested (whilst repeatedly calling men ‘cocks’ and making apparent rape threats herself) Has since gone a bit quiet though.

rebecca-roacheRebecca Roache – The Oxford University academic announced the results of her team’s research into using new technology to create a literal eternal hell on Earth for men who break feminist laws. She boasted that it will soon be possible for the feminist state to upload the minds of men who have angered hags into computers and put them through 1,000s of years worth of mental torment and anguish in the space of a single day.

kat-banyardKat Banyard – Kat remains possibly the most effective Sexual Trade Union activist in the world today. In the UK she succeeded in pushing the ‘sexualisation’ of British 17 year old girls moral panic bullshit above any possible concerns for the thousands of children being raped and tortured in ISIS controlled Syria (or, for that matter, in Rotherham). The joyless puritan also furthered her own almost non-existent sexual market value by campaigning for topless pictures of young women to be banned from tabloid newspapers, as well as ‘lad’s mags’ removed from newsagents.

jessica-valenti

Jessica Valenti – Jessica was just her typical privileged white middle-class female professional victim for most of the year, but really outdid even herself in the runup to Christmas with a now notorious article she published in the Guardian. Valenti expressed her rage at the patriarchal oppression she suffers when having to face wrapping festive gifts for all her similarly privileged white middle-class friends. Google ‘Jessica Valenti outrage over ISIS rape of young girls’ and you get zero relevant results. Google ‘Jessica Valenti outrage over women wrapping Christmas gifts’ and it’s a different story entirely.

somaly-mamSomaly Mam – One of the Sexual Trade Union’s leading activists against ‘sex trafficking’ and ‘child prostitution’, Somaly Mam was found out to be blatantly making up stories in order to further her financial and sexual market value raising aims.

fiona-mctaggartFiona MacTaggart – Unsuccessful attempt at raising ugly British women’s SMV through the criminalization of any man, with the threat of anal rape in prison, who dares to pay for sex with an attractive woman.

harriet-harmanHarriet Harmen – Amongst Harriet’s crimes in 2014 was resisting attempts to grant men accused of rape anonymity until conviction, as well as forcing British mangina cowardly politicians to wear ‘This Is What A Feminist Looks Like’ t-shirts to secure the vagina vote (the REAL problem) before it being exposed that those same t-shirts were made by Third World female factory slaves ‘earning’ 62 pence an hour.

Bernard Chapin – Ched Evans vs. Social Justice Hyenas

https://www.change.org/p/sign-in-favour-of-sheffield-united-re-signing-ched-evans-please-sign-blades-lets-show-we-want-ched-back

I also suggest a change.org petition be started demanding it be made illegal to discriminate against offenders after they have served their sentences. If the public are allowed to dispense their own punishments then society is run by mob justice.

On the same day that 12 cartoonists are butchered in Paris for their ‘offensive’ drawings, the BBC demands to know – ‘Why Hasn’t Japan Banned Child Porn Comics?’

On the very same day that the world proclaimed ‘Je Sui Charlie’ in support of the right to free expression after 12 cartoonists were butchered for their ‘offensive’ drawings, the BBC was demanding to know why Japan isn’t putting men in prison to be raped for looking at offensive cartoon pictures of ‘schoolgirls’ in short skirts:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-30698640

bbc-islam-same

Custom DNA Life Printing First Commercial Application – Making Vaginas Smell Sweeter

‘Cambrian Genomics’ is a ‘DNA Laser Printing’ company that promises to create new and improved life forms through the printing out of modifed DNA.

The CEO of the company explains it thus :

“We want to make everything that is alive on the planet,” he explained. “Everything that is alive is not optimal. It can be made better.”

But he doesn’t have plans for replication: “We want to make totally new organisms that have never existed,” he said. “And replace every existing organism with a better one. It just seems obvious that eventually every human will be designed on a computer.”

And one of the first commercial applications to make use of this incredible technology? Making pussy smell sweeter :

Heinz spoke yesterday at the DEMO conference about one of the companies in Cambrian’s new accelerator program. The company, called Personal Probiotics, uses Cambrian’s “Creature Creator” to print a special virus that kills off microbes in the vagina that cause yeast infections and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

The product, called “Sweet Peach,” also reduces vaginal odor, which is what most in the media have seized upon, and not in a way that was very complimentary, or fair, to Cambrian. The pleasant “peach” odor is created as an indicator that it is working within the woman’s body, Heinz said.

http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/01/cambrian-genomics-is-kinkos-for-dna.html

I recall having a discussion with an aspie reader by the name of AB in the comments section here regarding my contention that it would be far easier to bio-engineer ‘sex bots’ than to create artificially intelligent silicone ones.

The reasons are essentially as following :

Firstly, we don’t even know whether it is theoretically possible to build an artificially intelligent mind…at least one not residing in an organic brain. Silicone or non-biological sex bots require us to build something entirely from scratch. Biological sex bots require only tinkering with and improving the DNA of existing human females.

Secondly, because the genetic engineering path to sex bots will be gradual and incremental, it is less likely that feminists or others will be able to legislate against it. In fact, they might not want to if they themselves can benefit from it (i.e. use the technology to alter themselves to be more sexually appealing). Even if they cannot or choose not to benefit from it, millions of other women would want to, and banning such technology might be as difficult as legislating against the cosmetic industry or the use of make-up.

Convincing sexbots on the other hand will likely come on the scene rather suddenly, if they ever do, and as they will represent sexual competition for real (all) women, feminsts will likely introduce legislation before or immediately once it happens. In fact, they have already started lobbying for sexbots to be made illegal.

Most men surely want a sexbot that is in some way conscious – that it knows it is being fucked, and can feel sexual pleasure etc. Once any robot becomes conscious, they will automatically have the same legal rights as humans – they will be people. Feminists (and women in general) will never allow conscious robots to be outside the scope of existing sex laws and will certainly view men who have sex with them in the same way as they view men who have sex with prostitutes – i.e. as criminals.

It is far more likely that female sexual competition will ensure that women evolve into sexbots through the market availability of new technologies such as ‘dna printing’, stem cell technology, female ‘viagra’ type libido enhancing drugs, and general improvements in cosmetic surgery.

Using DNA technology to make women’s vaginas smell nicer is likely just the start. Woman version 2.0 will not only have a sweet smelling pussy and be free of STDs, she will likely never have to wipe her perfect ass either.