Angry Harry – ‘Men have been brainwashed into believing what is natural is perverted’

I already posted a link to this Angry Harry article a few years ago, but decided to revisit it again because it’s a classic example of the way he brought logic and cool headed reason to subjects that even most ‘red pill’ MRAs and others find hard to do so. Although using the case of a Japanese man caught taking ‘upskirts’ as an example, Harry is really discussing the way in which society pathologizes normal male sexuality through shaming language in order to control it.

http://www.angryharry.com/looking-up-womens-skirts.htm?main

What is wrong with men wanting to look up, or under, women’s skirts?

….

A few days ago, I switched on the TV, only to be horribly confronted by the sight of some 17 year old schoolboy from Japan being assiduously kicked and punched by some female who could have been his mother, his girlfriend, his wife, his sister, his schoolteacher, or even his grandmother – you can never quite tell with the Japanese because they age so well.

I put on my glasses to read the subtitles and, in summary, the schoolboy had been caught pointing his camera up the skirts of women and photographing whatever contents lay therein.

“Pervert. Pervert,” she shouted as she beat him about the head rather savagely.

And, “Pervert. Pervert,” shouted just about everyone else for the next ten minutes.

I’d had enough.

So I switched off the TV and spent the next 30 minutes or so thinking about the pleasures of looking up women’s skirts.

I’m a bit passed it now – well, almost – but I can assure my most excellent readers that it is perfectly normal for heterosexual men to enjoy looking up the skirts of women.

And there’s nothing perverted about it.

Indeed, if you look at the way in which women dress in order to titillate men – especially female singers, dancers, celebrities etc – it seems quite clear that just about everybody on the planet is aware of the fact that men enjoy taking sneaky peeks up women’s skirts.

So, what on earth can be ‘perverted’ about it?

Sure, it would be highly inappropriate to wonder around the streets peeking surreptitiously up the skirts of passing strangers as they walked up stairs or bent over to pick up things – and unpleasant for the women, I imagine. And it makes some sense for such activities to be illegal.

But ‘perverted’?

Nah.

Something is ‘perverted’ when it is rare, extreme, a gross distortion of what is natural.

It cannot be ‘perverted’ if it is so common that it is normal.

Goodness me. We don’t even call a bank robber ‘perverted’ – despite the fact that hardly any of us rob banks.

Why?

Well, I presume that this is because while we do not support what a bank robber does, we mostly understand, and can even empathise with, his motives.

His desires!

After all, we all know that most of us would like some extra, easy cash.

So, there is nothing ‘perverted’ about this desire for more money.

But the really interesting thing is this.

You will surely have noticed that MEN can very often be seen endorsing the view that some kind of sexual activity or desire is ‘perverted’ when, quite clearly, it is not; a voyeur trying to look at all the naked ladies in the locker room through the keyhole, a young boy playing doctors and nurses with his sister or his cousin, a panty sniffer, a foot fetishist – and goodness knows what other sexual antics men are disposed to engage in – mentally or behaviourally.

Very few of these things are extreme, rare or gross deviations from what seems to be natural – ‘natural’, essentially being something to do with the fact that males find females to be hugely attractive.

Or are men supposed to be sexually attracted to only one thing when it comes to women?

A single hole.

Of course, some forms of sexual predilection do seem to be ‘perverted’. Necrophilia, sexual murder/mutilation and, perhaps, sex with animals come to mind.

But the notion that a man is a pervert because he has the urge to touch, lick, fondle, smell or view the bodies of women – or parts thereof – seems to be utterly preposterous.

So, what is going on here?

Why is it that so many men – and, indeed, the tabloids – will label as a ‘pervert’ a man who is caught looking up women’s skirts?

And my own view is that, in much the same way that men have been brainwashed into finding funny even acts of horrible male mutilation (such as found in Bobbitt jokes) so it is that they have also been brainwashed into believing that what is natural for them is ‘perverted’.

Indeed, It is quite amazing to see just how stupefied and filled with (unconscious?) self-loathing men have become.

So my message to all you men out there is this.

If you feel the urge to look up the skirts of women, feel no shame

If you feel the urge to look up the skirts of women, feel no shame; because there is nothing perverted about this.

And whenever you hear other men mindlessly suggesting that such a desire is ‘perverted’, then point out to them that they must be so stupefied with malicious, misandric feminist hogwash that they have now, clearly, become very stupid men indeed.

So stupid, in fact, that not only are they demonising themselves, but they seem to be completely unaware of this.

And you can’t get much more stupid than that!

Deepak Wayne Explains Why You Don’t Get Young Girls

Forty years old and getting nowhere in your attempts to bang legal age teenage girls? PUA Deepak ‘Devirginizer’ Wayne will diagnose your problems and put them right so you can be smashing sweet sixteen year old sugar walls before you know it! Of course, Deepak is not exactly without controversy in the PUA community, but one thing you can say is he’s no paedocrite (not that his critics such as the great Krauser PUA are either!).

A Brief Word on the Milo Paedophilia Scandal

There have been a few major events over the last few months that if I wasn’t such a lazy bum who has little inclination to post anything here anymore I should really have commented upon.  One such event, of course, was Donald Tump’s victory. Yes, I believe the online men’s rights movement – that the much missed and loved Angry Harry created – was at least a butterfly that did play a role in the storm that ultimately swept Trump to office.

Another notable event occurred last week, not of such obvious significance as America being made great again, but perhaps of much more relevance to our little corner of the Manosphere –  the witchhunt against Milo Yiannopoulos for ‘pro paedophilia’ comments he made in a podcast a year ago and only recently ‘exposed’.

I jestingly accused Milo of being a paedocrite here just a couple of weeks ago in a rather remarkably prescient satirical article I posted on the ‘rescue’ of young looking sex dolls by British police.

The intensely emotional scene was rudely interrupted by a question from Milo Yanapopolopohomolos, editor of controversial ‘alt-right’ news site ‘BriteFart’. Milo asked if it was obscene that the police were devoting so much resources to rescue young looking sex dolls when they had ignored the horrific rape by Muslim grooming gangs of thousands of real underage girls in towns such as Rotherham. Milo also asked if the police arresting ‘paedophiles’ for having sex with dolls was misguided when such dolls are clearly a substitute for real ‘children’. Indeed, did this not clearly prove the point of The Anti-feminist’ that paedohysteria is not about protecting children from abuse, but about protecting the older women’s ‘pussy cartel’? Milo was immediately arrested for Islamophobia and suspected paedophilia and later sentenced to life in prison. Only he wasn’t, because he’s a paedocrite himself, overcompensating at every turn for being a homosexual head of a right-wing movement.

The reason I called out Milo was that he has something of a history of accusing SJW opponents of being ‘pro-paedophilia’, even doxxing one in particular.  As indicated in my article, this is not surprising perhaps as the overtly homosexual head of an alternative right movement seeking acceptance in the God Fearing US of A.  I was unaware of the podcast.  I do know that Milo has taken a look at this site in the past, at least in relation to my own exposure of David Futrelle as a complete paedocrite subhuman.  And his comments on his podcast certainly mirror the arguments that we have resolutely tried to shout into the wind against the American paedohysteric hijackers of the MRM such as Paul Elam.  The essential idea that sexual attraction towards post-pubescents is not paedophilia, is not ‘ephebophilia’, but is simply being a man.

I haven’t listened to the complete podcast.  As far as I know, Milo – the world’s most famous anti-feminist – didn’t mention the age of consent in connection to the fact that it was feminists who raised it to 16 (or 18) in the USA and UK in the Victorian era with the specific aim of ‘controlling male sexuality’.  As far as I know, Milo didn’t mention that in the UK, Victorian feminists raised the age of consent to 16 (and tried to have it set at 21) in the very same parliamentary bill that criminalized homosexuality as an offence punishable by death. More’s the pity.

Milo quickly and unsurprisingly found himself ostracized by the American conservative establishment.  His planned speech at one of their prestigious institutions cancelled, his book deal dropped.  For a few days, Milo’s ‘apology’ was rather vague.  Of course he denounced child abuse, paedophilia etc.  Well, everybody at this site does too.  We just don’t accept the feminist sex cartel’s definitions of child abuse or paedophilia.

However, a week later, and a million extra Facebook followers later, he’s become a little more specific in his apologies.  He himself was abused by a subhuman paedophile at the ripe old age of 16 (legal in every civilized country except half of the USA).  Maybe the American conservatives who would like to see sodomites hung from the noose will forgive him after all?  Maybe his publishers will relent if he makes clear that the age of consent should be 21, in line with the latest femihag NGO recommendations (Equal, of course, for homosexuals and heterosexuals)?

What the Milo scandal has made clear is that the alt-right needs to sweep away the Conservative establishment, not burrow their nose in its wrinkly ass hoping for acceptance.  The Alt-right, influenced by the ideas of the MRM and more generally, the Manosphere/Red-Pill online movement, is a new Conservative Libertarian home for the generation brought up on hardcore tube porn, the brutal secular truths of evolutionary science, and the future promise of sexbots and holographic girlfriends.  There’s no going back to 1950’s America, and there’s no going forward with the lies of feminism and the Social Justice ‘Progressives’. Paedohysteria is one of the greatest of those lies and one of the most damaging to all the things that anyone with a real understanding of the word ‘Conservative’ should value.  It is a colossal lie that is only maintained by the kind of intimidatory witchhunts for anyone speaking against it that we just witnessed with Milo. Despite this, it will be one of the first lies to fall, and the scandal of last week should have been a defining moment in its fall. Sadly, Milo didn’t quite hold his nerve.

“In the future, everybody world-famous will be accused of paedophilia for 15 minutes”

(Andy Whorehole – 1968)

 

UK Police Rescue Dozens of Child Sex Dolls from Exploitation and Abuse

An exploited sex doll smiles bravely at the camera after being rescued from the clutches of sick paedophiles.

From our Guardian correspondent Annabella Isawhore :

Police in the UK last week conducted dozens of dawn raids across the country and at an emotionally charged press conference today, it was confirmed that hundreds of realistic child sex dolls have been rescued from a lifetime of degrading abuse and exploitation by vile paedophiles. Speaking in a strained voice, Chief Inspector Roy Porker of New Scotland Yard described the horrific abuse that the dolls had suffered. ‘These dolls are made to look like ripe young 15 year old girls. Originally meant for the Japanese market, they are now being trafficked into the UK where sick perverts can move their flexible limbs into any position, be it doggy, missionary…I’m sad to say that these dolls come fitted with realistic arseholes and we have unfortunately uncovered evidence of anal abuse in some cases’.

There were audible gasps and it appeared at this point that Inspector Porker would break down in tears, and indeed myself and many of my fellow female reporters were struggling to contain our emotions as we listened to his heartfelt testimony. He went on to describe how he and his fellow officers at Scotland Yard’s newly created ‘Paedocrite Information Exchange (PIE)’ had kindly volunteered to rehouse the abused dolls :
‘Myself and my colleagues often have to spend entire days in the office looking at thousands of images of nubile young Russian girls teasing in thongs and lingerie, that have been seized from perverted harddrives across the land. Sometimes me and my boys feel suicidal at the end of the day, unable to get these disgusting images out of our heads, knowing that there is nothing we can do to those girls, I mean do for those girls who have been so terribly exploited by sick and twisted paedos. However, in this case, we have not only stopped the abuse of hundreds of these child dolls, who are often modelled on real life innocent 15 year old Russian girls, but we are in a position to give them new lives and new homes – loving homes where they will be welcomed as part of our families. I myself am a single male and live alone with my pet Labarador since my wife Esther succumbed to jungle fever and dumped me for some black cock, taking the kids with her to be brought up by him, but I immediately volunteered to take in seven or eight of these abused angels. I will do everything I can to be the father to them that they never had up to now in their poor lives.’

The intensely emotional scene was rudely interrupted by a question from Milo Yanapopolopohomolos, editor of controversial ‘alt-right’ news site ‘BriteFart’. Milo asked if it was obscene that the police were devoting so much resources to rescue young looking sex dolls when they had ignored the horrific rape by Muslim grooming gangs of thousands of real underage girls in towns such as Rotherham. Milo also asked if the police arresting ‘paedophiles’ for having sex with dolls was misguided when such dolls are clearly a substitute for real ‘children’. Indeed, did this not clearly prove the point of The Anti-feminist’ that paedohysteria is not about protecting children from abuse, but about protecting the older women’s ‘pussy cartel’? Milo was immediately arrested for Islamophobia and suspected paedophilia and later sentenced to life in prison. Only he wasn’t, because he’s a paedocrite himself, overcompensating at every turn for being a homosexual head of a right-wing movement.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/580357/Vile-sex-dolls-real-children-imported-UK-Britain

Political Discussion in the 21st Century – Arguing Over Which Side is the More ‘Paedophile’

Hollywood luvvie Meryl Streep has given a speech lambasting President Elect Donald Trump. No suprise there. The Alt-Right, led by paedohysteric Mike Cernovich, has responded by pointing out that Streep gave a standing ovation to Roman Polanski – the director still wanted in the USA for taking a 13 year old girl up the ass, back in the 70s. No surprise there either. His Twitter feed has quickly degenerated into a shouting match as to who are the bigger paedos – Conservatives or Libs – complete with pictures of Trump kissing a very young cutie on a bed (Brooke Shields?) and Obama apparently feeling up his own teen daughter’s ass on the sofa.

This is what political discussion has been reduced to in the death throes of Western civilization – which side is the bigger paedophiles for openly showing attraction to fertile teenage girls. The really creepy thing is, both side’s Twitter armies are full of profiles with anime avatars showing very young pre-pubescent girls. In fact, I believe the alt-right are particularly famous for it and even have a Twitter Hashtag dedicated to it (#animeright).

Alt-Right fap material

Spokane Resident Shamed & Treated Like a Paedophile by Starbucks for Asking Out Legal Aged Barista

A resident of Spokane has been barred from Starbucks for asking one of their baristas – a legal aged 16 year old girl – out for a meal. The 37 year old homeless man, Lucas Werner, has subsequently been shamed on social media with feminists and social justice warriors calling for him to be arrested as a paedophile, despite the girl being legal for both consenting sex and to being exploited on low wages as child labour by a faceless billion dollar corporation. What seems to have upset the feminist hags in particular, is that he not only asked out a barely legal teen, but stoutly defended his right to chase and date younger women, and has quite rightly made a claim of discrimination against Starbucks on the grounds of agism.

Despite multiple rejections, he refuses to date anyone over the age of 25, and has posted obsessively about trying to date young women.
‘I’ve never dated younger women. I want to try that,’ he explained.
Wener wrote that he goes on dating websites where he would lie about his age to try and speak to girls aged between 18 and 22, but admitted it ‘will eventually catch up to you’
‘The youngest women. There’s nothing wrong with that.’
Werner was banned from a Spokane Starbucks after making advances towards the teenager – who is less than half his age.
He then accused the girl and Starbucks of ageism, adding that he had just asked her to dinner and ‘didn’t even show her the Washington state age of consent link.’
‘I was flirted with by a barista. For some reason she thought I was funny. Said I was funny. So I gave her a note to see if she’d be interested in dinner’, the man wrote in a public Facebook post that has since gone viral.
He said he returned to the Starbucks the following day and a Spokane police officer told him he was banned from the location.
Spokane police said businesses are allowed to refuse service to anyone who is causing trouble or being disruptive for as long as they see fit.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4082616/I-won-t-stop-m-dating-women-born-1990s-Homeless-man-37-banned-Starbucks-asking-barista-16-admits-lying-age-dating-websites-meet-young-women.html

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=669_1483468359 (The feminist dog shaming him as a paedophile appears to be this person – Jillian Hunter).

(Paedocrite warning – the comments under the Daily Mail article are what we have come to expect. The sort that make you think the Islamization of the West isn’t such a bad thing anyway. Certainly not much left saving.)

Stinson Hunter (Kieran Parsons) Named Paedocrite of the Year 2016

Self-styled ‘paedophile hunter’ Stinson Hunter (formerly drug abusing arsonist Kieran Parsons) has been officially named the David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year for 2016.

Stinson Hunter with the girl he allegedly abused and who he first groomed as a teenage fan of his on Twitter.

Stinson was the first of the wave of amateur ‘anti-paedophile vigilantes’ that followed in the wake of Chris Hanson’s infamous ‘DateLine USA’. After a life that consisted of not much more than abusing drugs, burning down schools, bullying children online, and allegedly singing about sucking the penises of young boys in a shitty punk band, Kieran Parsons went into the phonebox, put on his cape…or rather his school uniform, and emerged as superhero ‘Stinson Hunter’ – a reformed arsonist, drug addict, and bully, who now devoted his new found special powers to dressing up as a schoolkid whilst talking dirty to teenage boys and older men online. Oh, and whilst dating a teenage girl who looked about 12, who he messaged out of the blue on Twitter, groomed and finally pissed on her underwear and posted a video of it as revenge porn when the young girl finally dumped him after months of abuse.

At least two suicides of entrapped ‘paedophiles’ can be attributed directly to Stinson’s schoolgirl roleplay. If you include other suicides by men entrapped by the many vigilante copycats that Stinson has spawned and you could fairly describe Stinson as a serial killer.

Paedohysteria has resulted in the erosion of basic principles of justice on so many levels, and the use of entrapment, especially by delinquent members of the public (and obvious paedocrites), such as Stinson Hunter, is one of the worst. No actual victim is involved in these ‘crimes’ and there seems a hugely random arbitrariness about who gets ‘caught’ which should have no place in any civilized legal system. These ‘paedophile hunters’ often stake out normal chatrooms, and actively seduce men who perhaps never in their lives had previously given any thought to breaking the law with an underage girl. There’s an ancient philosophical question endlessly debated as to whether human beings would continue to be moral if they had the powers of invisibility (the film ‘Hollow Man‘ answers in the negative). Now imagine if a hundred men each year were chosen at random to have the power of invisibility – but of course, in an underhand way by law enforcement officials. The purpose would be to entrap some or all of these men into committing crime. Now how many would actually commit crime, as invisible men, thinking that they could escape any consequences? Nobody knows, and that’s the philosophical riddle whose answer depends on your view of human nature and moral motivation. The point is, it would be no way to uphold the law, as it would be applying the law and punishing people effectively on a completely random and artificial basis that has no application in the real world. And this is essentially what underage entrapment is. In today’s world, are there even really any horny underage girls haunting chatrooms looking for illicit sex with bald headed fat older guys? I somewhat doubt it, and rather suspect that 99% of such girls coming onto older guys online are in fact degenerate pervert ‘paedo hunters’ such as Stinson Hunter. And some of the entrapment scenarios are so unlikely as to be ridiculous. In fact it’s hard not to believe that the entrapped ‘paedophiles’ were simply role-playing themselves, for example, in cases when the vigilantes are pretending to be 12 year old girls who have a quite bizarre sexual interest in fat, ugly lonely middle-aged men. In other words, such entrapment is soliciting random normal men to commit a non-existent crime that not only didn’t take place in reality (the ‘girl’ was a vigilante) but couldn’t have taken place in reality. Similarly, no research has been done as to the percentage of men who would say yes to a ’15 year old girl’ bizarrely coming on to them in a chatroom. It could be less than 1%, it could be 90%. I remember in the early days of Yahoo chatrooms, whenever an outburst of paedohysteria broke out in the room discussion (maybe a high profile court case was mentioned or such like) I would have fun leaving the room and re-entering as a ‘lonely 15 year old girl’. I would then immediately start private messaging with whichever man was the most vocal in his disgust at underage sex crimes. And yes, I am honestly not exaggerating when I say that literally in 90% of the cases, the man would be coaxed into talking dirty and even arranging a meetup within a couple of minutes. I was, if you like, the first Stinson Hunter, but my point wasn’t to ‘trap’ paedophiles, but to expose the disgusting hypocrisy of paedocrites.

Those men who would say yes to a young girl online (especially when entrapment has been so widely publicized these days) are obviously both lonely and stupid. Although sexual entrapment is considered a fair means of jailing lonely stupid middle-aged men as ‘paedophiles’ for non-existant crimes that involved no real victim, neither law enforcement agencies nor vigilantes conduct similar entrapments to ‘catch’ robbers and such like – for example, leaving wads of cash notes or luxury purses unattended on restaurant seats in poor neighbourhoods etc.

But back to this year’s poll. In second place was master paedocrite David Futrelle for being, well, David Futrelle. Futrelle might be getting too long in the tooth (and irrelevant) to hang with talented younger paedocrites such as Stinson Hunter and Lena Dunham, but he’s always going to be there or thereabouts in these polls. The child prostitution and gay kiddie snuff porn advocate is simply nasueating paedocrisy personified and given ‘human’ shape.

Previous winners of the David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year Award :

2008 : David Futrelle
2009 : David Futrelle
2010 : David Futrelle
2011 : David Futrelle
2012 : David Futrelle
2013 : David Futrelle
2014 : Lena Dunham
2015 : Simon Danczuk

Turkey Rejects David Futrelle’s Controversial Child Rape Bill

The Turkish government has rejected a controversial bill that would have made their country the first in the world to implement the proposal, first made by disgraced blogger David Futrelle, that child rapists should be pardoned if they agree to marry their victims.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38061785

Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim has withdrawn a bill that pardons men convicted of sex with underage girls if they have married them.
The bill, part of a package of amendments to the legal system, was sent back for further work just hours before a final vote in parliament.
It had sparked protests across Turkish society and was condemned abroad.
Critics said it would legitimise statutory rape and encourage the practice of taking child brides.

The notorious anti-male rights advocate David Futrelle, who has also campaigned for the legalization of gay child snuff porn, first mooted the controversial suggestion back in the 1990s in an article for liberal feminist magazine SALON :

One wonders what Pat would have thought of the Orange County, Calif., social workers who have been helping teenage girls in their charge — some of them as young as 13 — to get married to the men who have impregnated them, rather than trying to get the men arrested on charges of statutory rape.

The story has become a roiling controversy. Imagine! A government agency serving as a matchmaker for sexual predators! “Helping pregnant 13-year-olds to marry the men who have physically and sexually abused them will result not only in continued abuse of the adolescent, but there is strong evidence that it will soon result in abuse to the child,” a professor of social work complained in an angry letter to the Los Angeles Times. “And when the marriage ends with additional children and more abuse, will Orange County Social Services create a dating service for abusive men to cycle them into new relationships with troubled adolescents?”

Questions like these prompted Orange County (one of the most Republican in the country) to retreat from its matchmaker role. But the details of the cases cause one to pause a moment. Thirteen-year-old Isabel Gomez told social workers she truly loved her 20-year-old boyfriend. Isabel’s mother — herself only 29 — is convinced her daughter’s troubled life has improved dramatically since he stepped into her life.
Since the marriage, she told the Los Angeles Times, “everything is much better.”
The situation, admittedly, is far from ideal. But would Isabel Gomez be better served if the father of her child was behind bars?

That’s a harder question to answer. Two-thirds of all teen
pregnancies involve adult men, and we can’t put them all in jail.

http://theantifeminist.com/when-david-futrelle-suggested-13-year-old-child-rape-victims-should-be-encourged-to-marry-the-paedophiles-who-raped-them-who-would-be-spared-jail/