The grieving family of a man found hanged in a cemetery claim he was driven to suicide following paedophile accusations on Facebook.
Steven Rudderham, 48, was traumatised when his name, address and photograph were published online, along with a message calling him a ‘dirty perv’ and claiming he was a paedophile.
Within 15 minutes, the message had been shared hundreds of times and the bricklayer from Hull, East Yorkshire, began receiving death threats on Facebook, an inquest heard.
The police are ‘considering’ investigating. When a
false accuserrape victim has her name revealed on Twitter, they conduct dawn raids the next day.
Islamic militants have gunned down and murdered four prostitutes in Pakistan – and some still wonder why feminism/a Sexual Trade Union is not needed in these muslim shitholes :
Excerpts from the introduction to ‘The Secret of Bryn Estyn’ (2005) by the deceased journalist Richard Webster. This was a monumental expose of the hysteria and fantasy behind the witch-hunt over allegations of a paedophile sex ring at a North Wales children’s home – allegations now being revivied in the wake of the Jimmy Savile hysteria. (see Steve Moxon on this)
There is a view of history which suggests that as we progress towards civilised rationality, we are less and less likely to fall prey to unreason, or to be gripped by those episodes of collective insanity which have scarred European history. The demonological anti-semitism of the Christian middle-ages or of the great European witch-hunt of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were, according to this perspective, terrible aberrations from the path of progress; they belong to the childhood of humankind rather than to the state of rational maturity we have now reached. Witch-hunts are things that happen in other countries or other eras than our own. We have passed beyond them.
This book is written in the belief that such a view is not only mistaken but dangerous. The history of twentieth-century Europe certainly offers no evidence to support it. Both modern European anti-semitism and Stalin’s purges were marked by collective fantasies in which people identifying themselves as the “pure” sought to persecute or even destroy entire groups of human beings imagined as ‘evil’ or ‘unclean’. These are not the only modern examples of our susceptibility to large scale delusions in which, through a terrible process of psychological projection, we attribute to minorities we have defined as evil or unclean, our own unacknowledged desires and darkest impulses.
The widespread belief, that belonging as we do to a scientific rational age, we are no longer vulnerable to such fantasies, is itself one of the most dangerous of all of our delusions. For it is precisely because of our rationalism, and the difficulty we have of acknowledging our own violence and the full depth and complexity of our sexual imagination, that we are probably more susceptible to dangerous projections than we ever have been.
If we briefly survey the role which has been played in medieval and modern history by collective fantasies, one fact which will almost immediately become apparent is that many of the most powerful historical fantasies involve children and the need to protect them. For although we assume that our own anxieties about the vulnerabilities of innocent children are distinctly modern, this is very far from the case. The notion that there exists an evil conspiracy given to preying on children and causing them harm is an ancient one. One of the many forms it has taken was the accusation of ritual murder traditionally levelled against Jews by Christians in the days leading up to Good Friday. First made in Norwich in 1144, the accusation usually consisted in a baseless claim that a group of Jews had kidnapped a Christian child and tortured or murdered it for ritual purposes. This ‘blood libel’ circled the globe and travelled down the centuries to the time of Hitler, establishing itself as one of the main motifs of Christian and Post-Christian anti-semitism. The sinister conspiracy of child murdering Jews which it conjured up existed only in the imagination, but this did not prevent countless innocent Jewish people from being hunted down and killed in the name of Christian virtue. The notion that Jews were actually in league with the devil, and that they had designs on Christian children, lay at the very heart of medieval demonological anti-semitism – which is one of the most important and least acknowledged elements in the cultural heritage of Christian Europe.
A comparable fantasy, which was to prove just as compelling to the Christian imagination, would eventually emerge. This maintained the existance of a society of witches who flew through the air astride rams, pigs or broomsticks, and gathered together to engage in the orgiastic worship of their master Satan. The members of this evil conspiracy supposedly took particular delight in besmirching that which was holy and destroying innocence. They were sometimes imagined killing and eating young children or babies in sacrificial rituals.
Such fantasies as these do not belong, as we like to believe, to some primitive, archaic mode of thought that we have long since transcended. The more we feel impelled, in our pursuit of civilised rationality, to eclude from our own self-image violent, destructive, or sexually perverse impulses, the more we tend to define such feelings irredeemably external or alien. Projecting feelings we experience as alien is one of the ways in which we attempt to get rid of them. The process of demonising cultural enemies is, in this sense, entirely normal.
It is also dangerous. Whenever we allow any group of human beings to be demonised, the anxieties associated with our dreams of purity throughout history will almost inevitably be brought into play ; we will begin to imagine the group in question in the same terms which are found in other demonological fantasies. They will be seen as members of an evil, highly organized conspiracy intent on infiltrating our national life and harming the very people towards whom our own feelings are most complex and most ambivalent – our children…..
…..How, it might be asked, given the finding of the Tribunal, can the facts of what happened in North Wales still be in dispute? How could an inquiry presided over by a judge ever be held responsible for helping to lay the foundations for a modern witch-hunt?
One way of answering these questions is to point out that, of all the misconceptions about historical witch-hunts, perhaps the most important is that they were driven forward by the common people – that they were based on the untutored instincts of the mob. This is the very opposite of the truth. In historical reality the witch-hunts of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were the creation of the learned. They were set in motion not by ordinary people but by an educated elite consisting of bishops, ministers, magistrates and judges. These zealous agents of Christian purity pursued those they deemed witches not out of whims or fantasies but on the basis of what they believed to be solemnly attested facts. Historically, indeed, witch-hunts have always relied on judges and magistrates, and on official inquiries, in order to maintain their power and authority.
By turns horrified and fascinated by its vivid sexual content, many of those who were called upon, some three centuries ago to scrutanize evidence of witchcraft, suspended their critical judgement. They unsceptically accepted accounts of crimes that were unlikely or impossible and came to believe unreservedly that they had discovered solid evidence for an evil conspiracy which did not in fact exist. As a result, countless innocent men and women were convicted of offences they had not committed and many were burned alive.
Whenever we allow demonological fantasies to develop in our midst, as we have with in relation to the paedophile ring theory of children’s homes, there is always a danger that the same process of self-delusion may take place all over again. For when, small, zealous groups become seized by this kind of fantasy, they may well, as happened repeatedly throughout history, construct a narrative so powerful that they cannot escape from its grip. There is then a very great danger that they – or the agents of the church or state that they succeed in mobilizing – may begin unwittingly to ‘create’ the very evidence they need to intensify this fantasy.
Because fantasies of this kind are immensely powerful, and because we are all sucseptible to them, it is more than likely that we will fail to recognise what has happened. This danger is particularly acute when a delusion is based upon a palpable reality. For, when fantasy is mixed with fact in unequal proportions, the fantasy can sometimes even become more dangerous and even more destructive.
(theantifeminist : I wonder if a certain Men’s Human Rights Site would have the balls and the integrity to at least discuss Hewson’s thoughts? I mean, a leading barrister (female) claiming that the British state is persecuting old men and blatantly undermining the rule of law in doing so, might, to some, be considered relevant to men’s rights, even if myself and Steve Moxon are the only men’s rights bloggers to even mention it within the context of men’s rights.)
I do not support the persecution of old men. The manipulation of the rule of law by the Savile Inquisition – otherwise known as Operation Yewtree – and its attendant zealots poses a far graver threat to society than anything Jimmy Savile ever did.
Now even a deputy speaker of the House of Commons is accused of male rape. This is an unfortunate consequence of the present mania for policing all aspects of personal life under the mantra of ‘child protection’.
We have been here before. England has a long history of do-gooders seeking to stamp out their version of sexual misconduct by force of the criminal law. In the eighteenth century, the quaintly named Society for the Reformation of Manners funded prosecutions of brothels, playwrights and gay men.
In the 1880s, the Social Purity movement repeatedly tried to increase the age of consent for girls from 13 to 16, despite parliament’s resistance. At that time, puberty for girls was at age 15 (now it is 10). The movement’s supporters portrayed women as fragile creatures needing protection from men’s animal impulses. Their efforts were finally rewarded after the maverick editor of the Pall Mall Gazette, WT Stead, set up his own secret commission to expose the sins of those in high places.
See also : http://stevemoxon.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/yewtree-outed-as-obscenity-completely.html
A prominent barrister specialising in reproductive rights has called for the age of consent to be lowered to 13.
Barbara Hewson said in an interview that the move was necessary in the wake of the Savile scandal to end the “persecution of old men”.
She also said that complainants should no longer receive anonymity.
The NSPCC called her views “outdated and simply ill-informed” and said to hear them “from a highly experienced barrister simply beggars belief”.
Her remarks come after a number of high-profile arrests from Operation Yewtree, the police investigation into historic sexual abuse following the Savile scandal.
The arrests have included Max Clifford, Stuart Hall and Gary Glitter among others.
Isn’t it shameful that a female barrister can make such a plea, and yet when myself and my readers – all men’s rights supporters – argue that issues surrounding the age of consent should at least be discussed in the context of men’s rights, in order to stop the barbaric persecution of old men, we are effectively kicked out of the movement?
The Men’s Human Rights Movement, however, would rather get into bed with the devils in the NSPCC – a collection of pure and utter evil radical feminists, interested only in enriching themselves whilst soothing their own psycho-sexual jealousies through the persecution of old men for decades old ‘crimes’, and the promotion of medieval hysteria that leaves millions of men demonised and in fear of ruin.
We’re barely into the last week of the month, but when one man has given yet another typically unrivalled masterclass in the fine art of paedocrisy, there is simply no point in waiting any longer to announce the award.
There can only be one winner of the David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Month for February – David Futrelle.
>>Child abuse, Paedophilia, and Ugly Fat Fuck Trigger Warnings<<
Futrelle has been suffering from his monthly period pains over the last few days, and it showed when he lost all semblance of sanity and self-respect by once again inciting criminal violence against an old man for an interview he had given on incest nearly half-a-century ago – when Warren Farrell was a feminist, and when the questioning of such taboos hardly raised an eyebrow. This, despite it now being well known in both feminist and men’s rights circles that Fraudtrelle has a history, much more recent, of the most disturbing child abuse and paedophilia apologies that it is possible to imagine.
Although David Futrelle would prefer his past defence of paedophilia and child rape to disappear down an internet memory hole, all his writings defending child sex abuse are still online, archived, and there for the whole world to see. Let’s remind ourselves of some of the shocking things David Futrelle said during his early career in the 1990′s and early part of this century whilst writing for liberal online publications, when you could produce such articles and hope to get into the pants of feminist statutory rape apologist colleagues such as Judith Levine, and before his ‘ManBoobz MeetUps’ incarnation :
- Spent much of early career as a radical statutory rape apologist.
- Suggested adults who rape and impregnate kids not only shouldn’t go to prison, but should be encouraged to marry their victims (Sex and the Single Girls).
- Repeatedly denied the reality of the wide-scale sexual abuse of children at a time when the leading child protection charities such as the NSPCC were promoting such claims (example)
- Thinks pederasts fantasising about violently raping boys is ‘tender’ and ‘erotic’. (David Futrelle)
- Boasted (last year!) of handing out condoms and lube to teenagers and offering to teach them good sex
- Pleaded for an end to the regulation of internet pornography newsgroups, fearing mass arrests…in the late 1990′s, when such groups were infamous for the distribution and consumption of child pornography.
- Claimed that the raising of the age of consent from 12 to 16 was motivated merely by the prudish desire of Victorian suffragettes to ‘control the sexuality of young girls’.
- Worked alongside the most famous ‘statutory rape apologist’ in the world – Judith Levine – and one liberal article of his (‘Shameful Pleasures’) was actually listed in the references at the end of her most infamous work, ‘Harmful to Minors‘.
When reading what Futrelle has written in the past regarding paedophilia and child sexual abuse, bear in mind that he has stated numerous times to his mentally disturbed, young and vulnerable, would be ‘meet-ups’ at his site that any man who questions laws or definitions relating to paedophilia, child abuse, and child pornography, must be a paedophile himself.
You do the maths….if you have the stomach for it….
Reddit paedocrite trolls vent their fury at our hero George as he videos himself flirting with a 17 year old babe :
Despite this site being up for over 5 years now, and despite now recieving over 1,000 visitors a day regularly, there are still remarkably few men’s rights sites that link here. In fact, I can count them on one hand.
Even the great Angry Harry, who has honoured my site by linking to it from almost the very beginning, is missing from my statcounter these days.
I’m grateful to DelusionDamage for carrying my posts in their feed, and I’m reliant upon them for the bulk of my referring traffic.
If you run a men’s rights blog, then I’d be happy to put you on my blogroll if you agree to do the same, and if your site is of decent quality and reasonable viewpoint.
In fact, this blog discusses other themes in parallel to men’s rights issues, including male sexuality in general, PUA, and Transhumansim. Any site related to these themes is welcome to exchange links.
Link exchanges not only trade traffic and readers but, more importantly, improve both site’s search enging rankings.
If you want to link and have a link back from me, just drop a comment below with your URL.
I am only likely to refuse links if :
1/ your site is pro-feminist.
2/ your site is pro abuse industry.
3/ your site is completely unrelated to mine and of no interest to my readers.
4/ your site is crap.
A reminder to readers to please link to this site, and relevant articles within it, in the comments sections of other men’s rights/manosopher sites and forums, and elsewhere (for example 4chan). And I’m extremely grateful to those who already do so.
**Note to loyal and esteemed readers – I will be away travelling again shortly, for a couple of weeks.
When, 50 years from now, historians look back at the extraordinary amount of energy that was devoted in the early 2010s to investigating historical crimes allegedly committed by ageing celebrities, they will be stumped. They will face a serious challenge: how to explain the strange mutation of the UK justice system into a sub-branch of reality TV….
…So how does this police investigation as entertainment work? Well, if you want a glimpse into the interweaving of fact and fiction, visit the website of Shiver, the ‘factual’ arm of ITV. This is the company that produced Exposure: The Other Side of Jimmy Savile, which was the catalyst for the numerous ongoing investigations into his and other people’s alleged historical crimes. On the site, underneath a typically silly photo of Savile, there is a section titled ‘More Shows’. Almost seamlessly, Exposure: The Other Side of Jimmy Savile is banded together with other apparently public-service oriented reality programmes. Weight Loss Ward, The Grave Trade, May The Best House Win – those are just some of the wonderful reality shows mentioned next to Exposure.
In other words ‘protecting children’ – in the form of hunting ‘celebrity paedophiles’ – is now just another kind of female porn.