Teens at a German School Told Not to Wear Revealing Clothing in Case it Provokes Horny Syrian Refugees

A week ago emergency accommodation for 200 Syrian refugees was erected right next to the gym of Wilhelm-Diess-Gymnasium in Pocking, Bavaria, Die Welt reports.

The gym has been closed as a result, and PE lessons have been relocated to a nearby primary school, but the school is still worried about the refugees interacting with students.

So worried in fact that the headteacher recently sent out a letter to parents to give reassurance about extra security measures.

“For the refugees, access to the school gardens and buildings is strictly forbidden. The same goes for the school grounds during the day. The number of teachers on duty during breaks has been increased,” read the letter from headteacher Martin Thalhammer.

The letter goes on to give students instructions on how to deal with the situation:

“The Syrian citizens are mainly Muslims and speak Arabic. The refugees are marked by their own culture. Because our school is directly next to where they are staying, modest clothing should be adhered to, in order to avoid discrepancies. Revealing tops or blouses, short shorts or miniskirts could lead to misunderstandings.”

http://www.thelocal.de/20150626/refugee-school-calls-for-uniform-modesty

Now I understand if you’re feeling a little confused reading this. Are these bat shit insane left-wing quisling white middle-class ‘liberal’ Islamoapologists actually saying that muslim immigrants are paedophiles who get turned on at the sight of nubile teenage girls wearing shorts and low cut tops? If this is the case, surely we should be banning immigration from muslim countries on those grounds alone – that the men are sick subhuman fuckers who find 17 year old children attractive?

Women Go Ape Over Hunky Gorilla

Move over Jeremy Weeks, there’s a new hunky bad boy around that’s got the ginas tingling with jungle fever like never before….and this one’s not even human. Whilst men have to bow their heads in self-hating paedocrite shame whenever a beautiful post-pubescent, but under 18 female walks past, even the CNN is playing its part to break the last taboo of female sexuality, as it gleefully reports on how thousands of Japanese women are openly declaring their lust for the powerful black beast. You go girls.

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/26/asia/handsome-gorilla-shabani/index.html

Who could resist that striking countenance, that chiseled brow — and that toned, furry butt?

A surprisingly hunky male gorilla, Shabani, has female humans going ape after mugshots of the 18-year-old animal began going viral on Twitter.

Zoo officials tell CNN that young women have been flocking to see the pretty primate, who lives at the Higashiyama Zoo and Botanical Gardens in Nagoya.

Want to catch a glimpse of Shabani? Get in line. About 100 admirers constantly surround his exhibit, shouting “Look at me, Shabani!” and “This way, Shabani!” whenever he comes out.

See also : http://theantifeminist.com/tingles-in-the-mist-the-spearhead/

Nikola Tesla Explains MGTOW in 1924

Luckily for the great inventor, the feminist lynch mob was still almost a century away..

“I had always thought of woman,” says Mr. Tesla, “as possessing those delicate qualities of mind and soul that made her in these respects far superior to man. I had put her on a lofty pedestal, figuratively speaking, and ranked her in certain important attributes considerably higher than man. I worshiped at the feet of the creature I had raised to this height, and, like every true worshiper, I felt myself unworthy of the object of my worship.

“But all this was in the past. Now the soft-voiced gentle woman of my reverent worship has all but vanished. In her place has come the woman who thinks that her chief success in life lies in making herself as much as possible like man–in dress, voice and actions, in sports and achievements of every kind.”

“Women,” says Mr. Tesla, “are becoming stronger than men, both physically and mentally.

“The world has experienced many tragedies, but to my mind the greatest tragedy of all is the present economic condition wherein women strive against men, and in many cases actually succeed in usurping their places in the professions and in industry. This growing tendency of women to overshadow the masculine is a sign of a deteriorating civilization.

“Woman’s determined competition with man in the business world is breaking down some of the best traditions–things which have proved the moving factors in the world’s slow but substantial progress.

“Practically all the great achievements of man until now have been inspired by his love and devotion to woman. Man has aspired to great things because some woman believed in him, because he wished to command her admiration and respect. For these reasons he has fought for her and risked his life and his all for her time and time again.

“Perhaps the male in human society is useless. I am frank to admit that I don’t know. If women are beginning to feel this way about it–and there is striking evidence at hand that they do–then we are entering upon the cruelest period of the world’s history.

“Our civilization will sink to a state like that which is found among the bees, ants and other insects–a state wherein the male is ruthlessly killed off. In this matriarchal empire which will be established the female rules. As the female predominates, the males are at her mercy. The male is considered important only as a factor in the general scheme of the continuity of life.”

http://anengineersaspect.blogspot.com/2011/07/nikola-tesla-mr-tesla-explains-why-he.html

SPIKED – ‘The NSPCC : Still Fostering Fear & Suspicion

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the-nspcc-still-fostering-fear-and-suspicion/17087#.VYJsZ0b-CJd

As is now the NSPCC’s custom, How Safe Are Our Children? 2015 was brimful with frightening, press-release-worthy figures. In England and Wales in 2013/14, there were 31,238 allegations of sexual offences against children. This, we were gleefully informed, represents an increase of 38 per cent on the previous year.

But, for the NSPCC, even bad news is never quite bad enough. There may be more allegations of child sexual abuse than ever before, but the NSPCC is insatiable. It always wants more: more allegations, more reporting and more publicity. That is, it wants more people to come forward and tell the police that they have been abused, neglected or maltreated in some way. Because, as it and the rest of the child-protection industry never cease from telling us, whatever is alleged, whatever is reported, is only ever just the ‘tip of the iceberg’, ‘a fraction of the true number of victims’.

See also :

http://theantifeminist.com/category/the-nspcc/

http://angryharry.com/es-Curse-of-the-NSPCC.htm?AHMain

Why the ‘Sexual Abuse’ of Boys is Much More Serious than that of Girls

MHRAs are right when they say that society downplays the sexual abuse of boys as compared to girls. In fact MHRAs don’t go far enough. According to the underlying feminist logic behind sexual abuse and its devastating impact upon the victim, the sexual abuse of boys is MUCH more serious than that of girls.

Social Purity MovementFor most of history, society regarded the ‘sexual abuse’ of young teenage girls as serious because it entailed the ruining of her ‘honour’ – her reputation as virginal and chaste, and hence her value as a future wife. Of course, this historical justification for protecting young girls from sex never made any sense with regard to boys, of whom virility not virginity was prized, and hence the ‘double standard’ that MHRAs vent their fury against so much today became very much rooted in society.

Now in today’s feminist society, we pretend that virginity is no longer something to be valued in a female, and hence we can no longer argue that girls need to be protected from the male ‘predator’ in order to preserve their ‘honour’. Instead, we now claim that it is their minds or psyches that are ‘ruined’ by sex with older men. This is the feminist ‘trauma model’ of sexual abuse, and is nothing more than an attempt at a ‘scientific’ re-formulation of the desire to preserve virginity in girls, even though we have ostensibly abandoned that value. Feminsts want a high age of consent in order to remove sexual competition to themselves and their followers, and they use the ‘trauma model’ of abuse as a thinly disguised way to exploit the hardwired male inclination to protect and White Knight the virginity and chastity of young girls.

The Trauma Model is a near entirely empty concept with zero scientific credibility. It is, in fact, the Trauma Myth, or equally, the Trauma Tautology. Why does underage teen sex lead to trauma? Because underage teen sex is bad! Why is underage teen sex bad? Because underage teen sex leads to trauma!

In fact, a moment’s reflection would lead any sane and rational person to understand that if post-pubescent teenage sex was inherently traumatic, the human race would likely have become extinct within a few generations of arising. Certainly, many thousands of years and generations before the word ‘teen’ became far and away the most searched for porn term online.

But lets pretend that teenage sex is bad, not because it ‘ruins’ the ‘honour’ of the teen ‘victim’, but because it ruins his or her mind, esepcially their psycho-sexual functioning. As we know, in this, MHRAs agree entirely with feminists. All they want is for society to accept that underage sex affects boys in as devastating a fashion as it does girls. But they should go further than this. Because if this is the reason that teenage sex is bad, then teenage sex will affect boys much more adversely than it does girls. This is because it is the male that is expected to take the lead in sexual relationships, from start to finish. Men pursue women and women choose. Men have to display confidence, assertiveness (feminists have made this a legal minefield, of course), humour, risk taking for fear of rejection etc, as well as status which comes from a good career and achieving a high social rank. Women simply choose, and the wealth of their choices is determined largely by their looks.

Even in regards to navigating life and social relationships in general , some of what we might expect to be the marks of a somewhat damaged personality – shyness, introvertedness, nervousness etc – are much more easily forgiven, and even admired or found cute in a female, than they are in a male.

If teenage sex is bad because if devastates a young person’s ability to function sexually with the opposite sex, their confidence with regards to both sex and to social relationships and life in general, then we should expect it to have a far more serious impact upon boys than girls.

Perhaps MHRAs should not campaign to simply abolish the double standard, but to reverse it? Perhaps indeed we should raise the age of consent with regard to boys and lower it with regard to girls? This is the logical outcome of the trauma model of sexual abuse, or rather the ‘Trauma Tautology’.

An alternative would be to see the Truama Tautology for what it is, to campaign for the abolishment of the feminist high age of consent (or at least not to promote the Trauma Tautology and feminist child abuse industry), and to recognise that the disposibility of and contempt for the male is found in the double standard as regards alleged ‘predators’ rather than the ‘victims’ who have had that status forced upon them by feminists. It is the victim label that ‘ruins’ teenage ‘victims’ of willing sex, and it does so even more seriously for boys than for girls, and it is the ‘predator’ label which is leading thousands of men, and even increasingly boys, to face lives of imprisonment, fear, and ostracisation as ‘sex offenders’, the feminist version of the Nazi pink triangle, and perhaps soon, the feminist version of the holocaust.

double-standard

RealDoll Makers to Produce Sex Bots – Is the Fapularity Near?

real-doll-sex-botSome call it the Fapularity – the moment in time when the decades long decline in the price of sex for men reaches its inevitable conclusion – a crash to absolute zero…and it’s likely coming soon. Both Sex Bots and Virtual Reality Porn are a lot closer than you might think – today the makers of the famous ultra-realistic ‘RealDolls’ announced plans for their first generation of sex bots – dolls equipped with artificial intelligence which will allow them to blink, change their facial expression, and even engage in rudimentary conversation.

http://www.cnet.com/news/talk-techie-to-me-realdoll-wants-to-make-sex-dolls-that-move-talk/

Unfortunately, feminists have already drawn up hypothetical legislation to ban sex bots or severely restrict their use and sale, before they arrive : http://theantifeminist.com/feminists-seek-legislation-over-sex-bots/

Meanwhile, it was officially confirmed last month that the producers of the Oculus Rift Virtual Reality device, which will go on commerical sale early next year, will NOT attempt to block porn being played on the gadget.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/05/19/oculus-rift-will-be-open-to-virtual-reality-porn

According to a leading adult industry insider, virtual reality porn will make all existing fap material obsolete :

“Virtual reality porn will make 2D porn obsolete,” said Helmy, founder and president of Xbiz, which, like AVN, publishes a sex industry trade magazine and hosts conferences and an annual adult entertainment awards show.

The kind of free porn being given away now, Helmy said, “will be of little worth.” What Helmy and many others are really excited about is the joining of virtual reality porn with haptics, technologies that add sense, touch and interactivity to the porn-viewing experience.

The RealTouch, an Internet sex toy, is already being used by couples in long-distance relationships and sex workers on webcam (“camgirls”). It facilitates synced-up, tactile interactivity between two people using computers.

“Traditional porn is like the cassette tape,” said Helmy. “Virtual reality is the CD. But virtual reality and haptics – that will be like the advent of the Internet. Viewing devices will be the driver – the ability to control the view naturally, through haptics.”

FemiScientists Identify the Devil’s Mark on Paedophiles!

Feminist scientists have made further progress in preparing the ground for the sexual holocaust. After recent studies that ‘proved’ that sex offending was caused by genetics, the aging autistic dried up vagina boffins now claim to be able to identify paedophiles just by looking at them – if you’re male, left-handed, and have misshapen ears, it’s going to be a case of an early Zyklon B shower for you, before you can get your hands on a child…you disgusting subhuman nonce..

http://metro.co.uk/2015/06/11/can-you-spot-a-paedophile-just-by-the-way-someone-looks-5240127/

We may be able to spot a paedophile just by the way someone looks, a controversial study argues.

Scientists believe there are physical differences we can use to identify those who are more likely to commit sex crimes on children such as having non-detached earlobes, misshapen ears and being left handed.

Fiona Dyshniku, of the University of Windsor in Canada, said: ‘Evidence is steadily accumulating to support a neurodevelopmental basis of pedophilia.

‘If we find that paedophilia has a biological basis, with a very early, even prenatal onset, this will influence and hopefully improve methods of treatment for this group.’

A total of 140 people took part in the study – all of which showed signs of distressing or illegal sexual behaviour.

Weight Loss Expert Slams Fat Cow for Normalizing Obesity

http://www.sheknows.com/health-and-wellness/articles/1086202/weight-loss-expert-criticizes-tess-holliday-for-normalizing-obesity

tess-holliday-obesity-acceptance

Just like with any bold step forward in this country, there’s always someone chomping at the bit to criticize it. In the case of plus-size supermodel Tess Holliday, that person is weight loss expert Steve Miller.

While the 29-year-old model’s message “you can be gorgeous and fat” seems super body positive, Miller believes it absolves unhealthy eating habits. He told the Daily Mail, “Tess challenges the fashion industry’s preconceived idea of beauty and believes you can be gorgeous and fat which is ludicrous because fat isn’t great — it’s dangerous.”

Meanwhile, Reddit has apparently banned anti-fat ‘hate speech’ :

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mbvd/reddit-users-revolt-after-site-bans-fat-people-hate-and-othe#.kuoK2keqQG

Why doe feminists and SJWs promote obesity acceptance? Because they are literally attempting to disfigure and even kill their sexual competition, above all – teenage girls.