Younger Girls are Easier?

Interesting post from London PUA Steve Jabba (mate of our old friend Krauser PUA) :

http://www.authenticpua.com/blog/younger-girls-17-20-are-easier-than-20-girls/

I had actually been thinking of writing a post on this subject for a while, and as I don’t post anymore, it’s nice that a ‘master PUA’ has written it for me. I’ll just add a couple of brief points. As Jabba explains, teenage girls don’t really know their sexual market value yet. And this is what the age of consent amounts to as far as teenagers are concerned. Or rather, this is the only possible justification for a high age of consent, at least in terms of the hazy notion of ‘informed consent’. And don’t worry, I’m not endorsing the feminist aoc here, because it’s a nonsense Sexual Trade Union rationale, and only holds true if all women are prostitutes and all sex acts are economic transactions in which the female is considered to be raped (sexually robbed) if she has not obtained maximum reward for opening her legs. And even here I doubt very much that the feminists would be worried about the individual teenage girl ‘underselling’ herself, but rather their only concern would be with the broader effect on the price of sex if young girls are giving it away too cheaply. In other words ‘informed consent’ means being informed enough to be a responsible member of the pussy cartel – a whore who knows her price and who wont undercut other women.

And as far as PUA is concerned, in my own aspie way I’ve found it very much true that 16 year old girls are easier than 26 year olds. That comes with a huge caveat of course. Young girls are brainwashed by feminism to see older guys as disgusting, to only seek friendships let alone relationships or hookups with their peers, and to see a 30+ year old guy who approaches them as ‘creepy’ at best. So the rejection rate is higher, and the blowouts more brutal. But astonishingly enough, it does appear that it is easier to get that rare beautiful ‘yes girl’ from the younger age bracket.

Wolf-whistling to be treated as ‘hate crime’ by UK police.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jul/13/nottinghamshire-police-count-wolf-whistling-hate-crime

Uninvited sexual advances and unwanted verbal contact with a woman, including catcalling or wolf-whistling in the street, are to be recorded as a hate crimes in a new effort to tackle sexist abuse.

Nottinghamshire police has expanded its categories of hate crime to include misogynistic incidents, characterised as behaviour targeted towards a victim simply because they are a woman.

This means incidents ranging from street harassment to unwanted physical approaches can be reported to and investigated by the police, and support put in place for victims.

The force is the first in the country to adopt the separate misogyny hate crime category, and has provided specific training to selected officers in the past three months.
The stories you need to read, in one handy email
Read more
Commenting on the new procedures, introduced in partnership with Nottingham Women’s Centre, Ch Con Sue Fish said: “I’m delighted that we are leading the way towards tackling misogyny in all its forms.

Ephebophilia, Eastern Europe, and Activism

Ephebophilia (or ‘hebephilia’) is a word commonly bandied about online by individuals wishing to differentiate between men (like themselves), who are attracted towards underage teenagers, and ‘paedophiles’ who are sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children.  Of course, the media, and the legal system, makes no such distinction.  However, many who would champion the right of men to have sexual relations with girls currently under the age of consent feel strongly that if this distinction was more widely known and accepted then it could facilitate a  more reasonable public discussion on the age of consent and the laws and punishments relating to sex with teens.  Paedophiles are evil perverts and beyond the pale, but ephebophiles?  Well, they are not so very different from the average red-blooded man – they just like their women a little bit younger.  Yes, they are suffering from a clinical disorder, as paedophiles are, but it’s not so harmful and they are a lot closer to the normal spectrum than subhuman paedos.

So is ephebophilia a real thing? Does the concept serve any useful purpose in the context of the feminist war upon male sexuality and age of consent issues in particular?  And am I just as much as a hebo as some of my former readers who have championed the label in the past, such as ‘Human Stupidity‘?

As regulars will know, I’ve made a point of strongly disavowing the very idea of ephebophilia.  There are two good reasons for this.

Firstly, my experience of ‘ephebophiles’ both here and elsewhere online.  Self-identified ephebophiles tend to be universally 1/ clearly autistic 2/ tactically clueless 3/ prone to paedocrisy and even 4/ Left-Wing and pro-feminist (obviously some exceptions, such as HS) and certainly ‘anti-misogynistic’.

To put it bluntly, based upon my experience, such people are worse than useless in the fight against the Sexual Trade Union.  I’d rather go into battle against an Isis horde with only a dozen disabled, pacifist, transgenders alongside me than these creepy ‘ephebophiles’.  Hell, I’d rather take on a handful of Russian Ultras with a thousand English football hooligans to back me up.  That’s how pathetic these aspie hebos are when it comes to the street fight we are all in.

Secondly, I see no strategic advantage whatsoever in embracing the label of ephebophilia.  ‘Hebos’ are so clueless that they really do believe, in their aspie naivety, that the same hysteric mobs who burn down the homes of pediatricians will take kindly to a group defining themselves by a slightly different Ancient Greek term meaning ‘ perverted love of underage girls with hair and perky breasts’.

Of course, this isn’t quite fair.  Ephebophilia means ‘love of youth’ (form the Greek word for youth – ‘hebe’).  And the attraction to young post-pubescent girls is indeed normal. The point is, to paedohysterics, a word doesn’t change a thing.  David Futrelle, child snuff porn apologist and paedocrite that he is, is right to mock the idea that it could ‘win over’ feminists or the paedo hating population at large.  In fact, it could make things very much worse.  I have spoken here before of the fact that shows like ‘To Catch a Predator’, and ‘anti-paedophile’ vigilantes such as Stinson Hunter, nearly always target men who are trying to have sex with girls only a little under the age of consent.  They never try to entrap real perverts and child molestors.

The reason why we have this insane moral panic over ‘paedophiles’ is not because perverts who molest 5 year old children are hated.  It’s because society hates and fears even more the normal men who break age of consent laws by having sex with nubile young teens.  Paedocritical men are shouting at the bulge in their pants at the thought of climbing into bed with a sexy 14 year old, and all the legal consequences that would follow for them, and paedohysteric woman (and feminists) are shouting at the millions of men who would not even hide the bulge in their pants and openly pursue teenage girls if it wasn’t for the law, the shaming, and the feminist induced hysteria over ‘paedophilia’.

It is true to an extent that establishing the concept of ephebophilia in mainstream discourse would help to clarify what real paedophilia is and isn’t.  Real paedophilia is a psychological perversion involving the sexual preference for pre-pubescent children (in today’s USA, that means girls under the age of 10 or so).  But at the same time, I see absolutely no advantage in replacing one clinically defined pathology with another. Anti-feminism is the fight against the feminist suppression and pathologizing of normal male heterosexuality.  It is normal for men to be sexually attracted to females who have started puberty and who have the maximum number of fertile years ahead of them.

Ephebophile activists believe they can identify themselves as a group and fight for and eventually win their sexual rights, just as gays (supposedly) did.  No they can’t.  However, MEN can perhaps reclaim their sexual rights against feminists.  Only normal, heterosexual MEN can win in the fight against the war on male sexuality.

With all this said, however, I wouldn’t be honest not to add my own personal experiences over the last couple of years, and describe how they have perhaps enabled me to look at the ‘ephebophile question’ in a new and more nuanced light.  For some time I’d largely given up on dating.  I was getting older, I was still introverted and awkward around the opposite sex, and in any case, as ‘the Anti-Feminist’ I saw all women as rapists, every one of them limiting male sexuality in order to futher their own selfish sexual ends. Walking down the street and smiling at a pretty jailbait as an act of defiance was the limit of female involvement in my world.

For over two years now I’ve been spending the majority of my time in Eastern Europe.  As most readers accept here, Slavic women are much more feminine and better looking than their Anglo counterparts, with Russians at the very apex of the female beauty pyramid. Furthermore, they age rather differently too.  Yes, of course any normal man would be attracted to even an average Russian 15 year old girl, but the ‘Manosphere Myth’ that I’ve criticised here in the past regarding peak fertility and women reaching their maximum attractiveness at 21-25 isn’t so implausible when you constantly see such stunningly beautiful long legged slim women in their early twenties all around you.

In Eastern Europe I don’t get the achingly painful sense of regret at seeing a pretty 14 year old girl and thinking that by the time she is legal, she will already be losing her youthful charm and beauty. The fact is, in the UK, and even in countries such as France and Germany, the majority of girls are burnt out, bitter, overweight slags by the time they reach 18.  Because of diet, lifestyle, and genetics, even pretty 14 year olds do start to lose it by the time they are off to university. In Eastern Europe, puberty arrives a little later, lasts longer, and everywhere you turn there are 20 year old women who are ravishingly beautiful, have perfect skin, possess the long slim legs of ballerinas, and who wear elegant fashions with a graceful air.

Furthermore, I’ve fallen in love with at least a couple of such specimans.  One of them is now 26.  I have seen photos of her when she was a teenager and the curious thing is she didn’t look anything special even at 17.  By 21 she was modelling, and even now as she approaches her 30’s, I get jealous looks constantly when I am with her, even in a city where HB8s are the norm.  Even the likes of Krauser PUA would give me a nod of respect if he saw me with her.  Look closely and she has crow feet developing around her eyes.  Her skin is no longer perfect.  But if I could re-wind time I would not wish her any younger than 21.  And it’s not down to make-up either. I have seen her without, and she is still beautiful, and more beautiful than she was when she was a schoolgirl.

Another of my girlfriends is 20, and very pretty.  She still looks like a teen, and even behaves like one in many ways, though thankfully more in a cute than insufferable manner.  Although beautiful, I do not recieve so many jealous looks when I am with her as when I am with the woman who is a good deal older.  This girl, I only met recently. I have seen photos of her when she was 18, and she looked almost perfect.  I would have liked to have known her then, and I would still not object to a girlfriend such as her who is 16 or 17.  However, in Eastern Europe the age of consent is not such a weighty issue given the mass of beautiful females aged above even 18.  And this is probably why paedohysteria is primarily an Anglo-Saxon phenomenon.

So in the light of my experiences, how would I finally appraise ‘ephebophila’?  As to whether it is a real thing, I am both more and less inclined to say yes.  Despite my disavowal of the term here in the past, I somewhat suspected that I might be ‘a little different’ to the average man.  Not just in being honest about attraction to young teenagers, but perhaps more strongly attracted than most.  Although partly right, I think I had simply fallen into the same mistake that I’d rightly accused self-identified ‘ephebophiles‘ of making.  The honesty to accept that teens are attractive can lead you to identify yourself, even subconsciously, as ‘somebody who is attracted to teenage girls’ and different to other men, and to somewhat ignore the charms of slightly older females.   And this is compounded by the disgraceful state of femininity in the Anglo-Saxon world, a world in which the only feminine and loveable girls left are indeed mostly under 18.

If ephebophilia exists, therefore, it is not a clinical disorder, such as real paedophilia is, but rather a situation in a man’s life brought about by feminism and the state of women in the Western world.

And as a badge, it’s still tactically clueless and aspie.

My experiences of falling in love have also altered somewhat my views on ‘normal male sexuality’ in the sense that I now give more value to the merits of sex within a loving relationship.  Of course, I am not now claiming that the female monogamous system is ‘right’ for men.  I am currently in love with two beautiful women, and I think I have emotional room left for a couple more as well, hehe.  All I’m saying is I no longer mock the notion of love, and that sex with love is, after all, something that every man should be able to experience as part of a happy life.  I also look at porn less, and so I have to admit, I am closer to Eivind Berge’s view that real relationships are better than fapping.  However, I still feel that he doesn’t understand the dangers of giving the slightest credence to feminist arguments against porn.  And also, not many men can have girlfriends as good looking as his, and not many men approaching 50, as I am, can walk down the street with a beautiful 20 year old, or a HB9 26 year old, as I can.  Porn never stopped me having relationships.  Rather, it was a life-saving substitute in fallow times.  It also helped to keep the flame of desire alive as I sank into middle-age.

And that thought leads nicely onto a final word regarding my contribution to men’s rights activism and the lack of updates on this blog.  Yes, I am in some ways happier and more content than before, and therefore no longer feel the need or have the desire to carry the stress and time commitment of regularly posting articles here.  It’s also true that I certainly no longer feel any personal pain at current age of consent laws.  I would certainly be satisfied forever more at having relationships with beautiful Slavic girls aged 16 above, or even 18 above.  But this certainly isn’t the reason for my lack of involvement in men’s rights.  I still maintain that the ‘age of consent’, or more correctly, all the many issues that revolve around it, as part of the wider assault upon male sexuality by feminists, is the leading men’s rights issue.  But perhaps I am less inclined to maintain this site, just when I am finding some happiness and sexual satisfaction, to cater to disloyal self-identified ephebophile readers such as the likes of Jon or Human-Stupidity, themselves prone to paedocrisy whenever it suits them.

However, I will strive to write at least one decent article a month going forward, as well as reblog others such as Steve Moxon* and some Angry Harry classics as promised.

*As a final note, Steve Moxon is the best in the mansophere at distinguishing real paedophilia from attraction to post-pubescent teenagers, yet I believe he has never used the term ‘ephebophile’.

 

London Under SHEria Law – Muslim Mayor Bans Bikini Posters

The femislamisation of the West continues apace.   London’s recently elected Muslim mayor, the first such ruler of a Western city in over 500 years, has already began the implementation of SHEria Law by banning images of slim models in bikinis from advertisements appearing on the London Underground and elsewhere.

The mayor uses a feminist justification for the ban – the images of healthy young women showing bare skin ‘body shames’ the average female Londoner. Femihag campaigners have been trying to force such a ban since last year.  We will see more and more of this as Muslim political power grows – feminist lobbying leads to Muslim politicians enforcing modesty and anti-sex laws under the guise of ‘protecting women’.

Feminism is a Sexual Trade Union so similar to Islam that it is not needed in Islamic societies.  Islam may treat women badly in many ways, but in the thing that most concerns the vast majority of women – their ability to sexually compete with other women who are younger, prettier, and more available – it serves their needs very well. Certainly much better than the free sexual market of the secular West.

After the Orlando shooting at the weekend, the question again arises as to how left-wing ‘liberal progressives’ can be so retarded and schizophrenic as to fail to see that support for Islam is completely incompatible with support for gay rights.  But really, it’s not so much more retarded or schizophrenic as the inability of Manosphere Conservatives and ‘Islamophobes’ in general to see that Islam is entirely compatible with ‘women’s rights’.

The Left will continue to support the mass importation of millions of gay hating Muslims, even when it leads to massacres as in Orlando, because feminism is the tail that wags the Left-Wing dog.  And for the Sexual Trade Union, the gay rights lobby are at present simply useful idiots in the need to present a sexually progressive and tolerant face to the world whilst feminists wage a brutal medieval war upon sex, and male sexuality in particular.

Feminism is a virus that manifests itself in sexually open societies – you could almost call it an intellectual syphilis.  The only way it can be contained is by having a society that is not sexually open and that conforms to female evolutionary mating strategies – i.e.  strictly enforced monogamy.

The effect of the feminist virus is not only to kill sexual openness, but to weaken the host society so much that an even more robust parasite, genetically related to the feminist virus – Islam – can fully take over the corpse of Western civilization.

Paedocrite PUA Dan Cilley

Dan Cilley is likely the world’s worst PUA.  His ‘Game’ consists largely of approaching a random young female with the words ‘I like you’ and then after the inevitable rejection filming her butt whilst manically hollering to himself and screaming ‘I lOVE YOU!’ at the fleeing girl. This guy makes George Godley look like Krauser PUA.

Today Dan uploaded a video in which he reports lingerie chain ‘Victoria’s Secret’ to the police for ‘promoting paedophilia’ through the use of under 18 looking models in posters adorning their store windows.

But check out this compilation of the master PUA in action and judge whether or not Cilley is also something of a master paedocrite

What a fu**ing paedocrite!!!

MRA Veteran ‘Factory’ on the Killing of Angry Harry’s Cause by AVfM

MRA veteran ‘Factory’ in an eloquent YouTube rant on the corruption of the men’s rights movement by lefties, manginas, SJWs, and abuse hysteria validators at AVoiceforMen and Reddit/r/mensrights. Things have gotten so bad that the likes of Paul Elam now slander our old friend Bernard Chapin as the ‘right-wing equivalent of David Futrelle’, whilst Elam’s partner in crime Dean Esmay accuses MRAs who criticize feminist sex hysteria of being ‘rape apologists’.

Men’s Rights Infiltrated by Leftists

Full Backup of Angry Harry’s Site

Our great friend Scarecrow has made a complete RAR archive Angry Harry’s site. You can download it at :

http://www.rip-factor.com/AngryHarry/AngryHarry.html

In the words of Scarecrow :

This link contains a RAR archive of everything downloaded from his site.

It is in its RAW form – java scripts, css and all.

Feel free to download it – or – download the AngryHarry web pages yourself.

Huge thanks to Scarecrow for doing this, from myself and I’m sure all of my readers too.