All the news that’s fit to fap to.
Gaurdian Femihag Writer Links Display Of Female Underwear To ‘Epstein Types’
TRIGGER ALERT – SICK BAGS AT THE READY
According to a repulsive femihag writer for the American Conservative (LOL – just humoring ephobphiles/Eivind’s readers) Guardian newspaper, the chief lesson to be learned from the Epstein case is that indecent displays by beautiful young females in underwear must be banned.
She added – piercingly unaware that the inspirational event would not be with us much longer – that the show “allows all of us to be the best versions of ourselves”. Much as a butcher’s shop gives all cows a chance to shine. Less affirmatively, a VS executive, Ed Razek (recently retired), explained that neither trans nor plus-size women fitted with the “fantasy” of the show. The VS models are – were – young, narrow, unusually tall, and expected, like prize animals, to adhere to stringent diet and exercise regimes, the better to de-sleaze, via their own lean athleticism, the brand’s essentially Amsterdam shop-window aesthetic. Adriana Lima, we have learned, empoweringly, “stops drinking entirely” 12 hours before the show. Hence, similarly, the de-pornifying wings and the preferred epithet, for its models, “angels”.
Whatever killed the show, it was not unfriendly media coverage. In fact, given the widespread determination to portray this high-end woman-trussing as iconic, empowering etc, the brand’s gloss on the cancellation amounts to a critique of its lavishly uncritical press. Why hadn’t Vogue et al pointed out that the annual thigh-fest was as inspirational a fashion event as, say, Eric Morley’s Miss World, the Rear of the Year award or, for that matter, female gymnast curation in the former Soviet Union? Now the new chief financial officer of L Brands (which owns VS), Stuart Burgdoerfer, says: “We think it’s important to evolve the marketing of Victoria’s Secret.”
The hag even appears to bring Russian teen gymnasts into it. Yeah. We need to ban beautiful Russian gymnasts (and presumably ice skaters), and if you disagree then you’re a paedophile Epstein enabler. She also compares young female fashion models to cows in a butcher’s shop AND whores soliciting for clients in Amsterdam’s red light district.
Notice she also brings in the tranny issue. Victoria’s Secret needs to go because they did not promote square jawed trannies as objects of male sexual attraction.
And people like Eivind Berge and his ephebophile army still think the answer is being accepted by the LGBT community (whilst doing the feminist’s job of gouging out the eyes of any man fapping to images of pretty girls in underwear).
Notice further that on virtually the same day, the same paper reminds its upstanding ever so morally superior readers that we must not succumb to populist posturing just because a convicted terrorist was freed early and allowed to stab to death two people and maim many others on London Bridge.
Alas, we do not live in a rational world. The average IQ of a Guardian reader is probably a lot higher than the general population. Yet they can read these two articles, and nod their heads in agreement with both. Yes, some guy bonking 17 year old whores in the USA proves we need to crack down on lingerie fashion shows, beauty pageants, and nubile Russian teen gymnasts. A crazed Islamist released after only a couple of years after being convicted of trying to blow up hundreds of innocent civilians, and who then goes on to commit an atrocity in the center of London, only serves as an example of how the populist mob, catered to by populist vote seeking Conservatives, are so dumb to draw obvious connections and demand new measures – such as keeping convicted terrorists in prison at least as long as lonely old men caught fapping to pictures of girls in lingerie.
And according to ephebophiles and spergs, ‘a finer analysis is needed’ as to what’s behind all this madness.
CIA?
Female Indian MP Calls For Lynching Of Suspected Rapists
A female member of the Indian Parliament has called on the public to be allowed to lynch suspected rapists. She was speaking in the context of widespread fury at the horrific gang rape and murder of a young female vet.
An Indian MP has said the men who raped and murdered a 27-year-old vet in the city of Hyderabad should be “lynched”.
“I know it sounds harsh, but these kind of people should be brought out in public and lynched,” Jaya Bachchan said in parliament.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50627430
When a politician calls for the public to deal with rapists themselves, then all it shows is that she and her colleague are not up to the job and have failed in their role to uphold the law (and a civilized society) through the mechanisms of the State.
I have not a shred of sympathy for the beasts who committed this crime, but…perhaps part of the reason why there are so many such horrific rape/murders in India is because they already have the death penalty for rapists there?
Of course, the one or two readers here who I have managed to convince over 11 years of slog as to the blindingly obvious truth of Sexual Trade Union theory, will realize that these middle-aged female politicians and NGOs have no interest in actually stopping these rare but horrific sex crimes. In fact they deliberately encourage it with their insane laws and policies. For example in Europe importing millions of horny single young African and Arab males, or by arresting men who approach women in the street for sex.
They know these things will lead to more sex attacks on young women, and they secretly embrace that because it will lead to excuses for ever more draconian anti-sex laws, as well as the femislamization of their society.
Feminists Want Paul Gaugin’s Art To Be Censored
I remember when blind (literally) man David Blunkett’s sweeping new Sexual Offences Act of 2003 was being put through parliament, there was some concern that the vague ‘virtual child pornography’ provisions might criminalize great art works. The femihags at the time stressed that such fears were stupid and simply scaremongering.
Paul Gauguin is under attack from supporters of post-colonialism and feminism because of his erotic paintings of Polynesian girls and women. Is censoring art of long-dead artists for moral reasons constructive?
Curators of the current display of Gauguin portraits at the National Gallery in London have not included any of his famous nudes, even though they could be described as portraits. Gauguin is in the firing line because of his erotic paintings of Polynesian women and his life, while living in Polynesia from 1891 until his death in 1903. The attacks come from supporters of post-colonialism and feminism. Academic post-colonial studies treat colonialism and all its products as irredeemably unjust; feminism is deeply hostile to any sexualised depictions of women by men.Some criticism of Gauguin has been vicious: “He was, in almost every way, an absolute prick.” “Exquisite art by the Harvey Weinstein of the 19th century,” adds another review. The exhibition seems part artistic assessment and part historical trial.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/474584-censor-paul-gaugin-art/
Pigs Reluctantly Forced To Pay Out To Harvey Proctor
False abuse claim victim Harvey Proctor has won his battle for compensation from the corrupt Met Pigs. The subhuman animals been forced to reluctantly agree to a £900,000 pay out, although the devils still have’t apologized for the trauma they caused him, and other (now dead) senior figures on the word of an obvious fat paedocrite (Carl Beech) and his equally fat paedocrite friend, the Labour politician Tom Watson.
Proctor was engaged in an 18-month legal battle with the force.
Operation Midland, which was conducted by the Met in London from November 2014 to March 2016, investigated several high-profile people over accusations of child sexual abuse and homicide. Other raids were made on the homes of the D-day veteran Lord Bramall and the former home secretary Leon Brittan.
However, the 18-month operation turned out to be based on a series of lies told by Beech, then known as “Nick”. Beech had falsely claimed that he and other boys were raped and tortured in the 1970s and 80s by members of a VIP paedophile ring. Brittan died before learning he had been exonerated.
Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate – sent direct to you
Read more
Proctor stated in a high court document that the accusations resulted in him losing his job and home, and caused a “major depressive illness”. A key part of the legal action concerned the senior detective Kenny McDonald’s public statement, made during the early stages of the investigation, that Beech’s allegations were “credible and true”.Proctor said that “elementary research” by the police would have shown Beech’s allegations were false. Beech is now serving an 18-year prison sentence for 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud.
It Is Now Illegal In Australia To Call A Femihag A Misandrist
An Australian Senator has been awarded NZ$126,711 after suing a former member of the senate for calling her a misandrist, another word for a man-hater.
Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, told the press the victory was for women who had been ‘made to stay silent’.
And it’s a victory for women ‘being forced to stay silent’!
Not a rational world we live in at all.