Why I Came Back

After a bitter and costly legal battle with teenage sweetheart turned OnlyFans creator Sabrina Vaz, I finally won back my site recently, and hence was at last able to resume blogging after a four year hiatus. But here are some other reasons why I have come back to ‘topple Eivind from his throne’, lol.

The Fall

I first started blogging under this persona nearly 20 years ago, around the time when the ‘Manosphere’ was forming and first getting noticed. Especially during the early years, writing about anti-feminist issues was cathartic during a period of stress in my personal life, and having some discussion with like-minded individuals in the comments section was also extremely helpful to me. There was also a great deal to be hopeful about in the early days. The men’s rights movement was growing fast, along with ‘MGTOW’, and other male-dominated sub-cultures such as the PUAs which collectively would all fall under the label of ‘the Mansophere’. We were all left frustrated when our concerns about anti-male sex laws were increasingly dismissed as ‘coat-tailing’ at places like r/mensrights and AVoiceforMen, but there was still hope that we could grow a ‘real men’s rights movement’.

This dream of a pro-male sexuality movement that would actually fight feminist sex laws slowly faded. The men’s rights movement became even more of an ‘equality of injustice’ sham under the effective leadership of Paul Elam. Angry Harry died. Written blogs were superseded by YouTube and other attention-grabbing forms of social media that were controlled by a handful of big tech companies that had a zero tolerance for anything that discussed teenage sexuality or anti-porn laws. Bloggers in our loose network started to give up the fight, and others became increasingly weird and egotistical.

In 2019, paedocrite trolls started targetting our blogs in the comments section. And then there suddenly appeared a possible savior of our movement – Tom Grauer! The problem with this veritable shitposter was that he assumed a troll persona and style, just when we were being harassed by trolls. And he was clearly over the top, and likely would have given us the wrong kind of attention. I suspected he was a malicious troll and some kind of red flag and agent provocateur. It seems though, he was just a well-meaning individual who was as frustrated as all of us with the lack of progress in even sparking the first flickering flames of a movement to resist feminist sex laws. So if he reads this, I do apologize to him.

This all came at another period of turbulence in my personal life, but in this case, continuing to blog was not cathartic at all, just an increase in stress. My elderly mother was dying of cancer. And the thing that pushed me over the edge in making the decision to ‘retire’ was the increasingly sick comments that were being left on my blog. I was waking up every morning to read some psychopathic paedosadist projecting his own depraved fantasies on to me. Although for some time Eivind’s blog had also been ‘under attack’, it seems that this individual was actually a Breivik supporting follower of Eivind who was upset that I was dismissive of the ‘ephebophile’ identity. I did switch off the comments for a while, but it did get pretty lonely here without any feedback on articles, and for all the other reasons mentioned above, I decided to quit.

The Return

So why have I come back? Well, not only my mother died, but more recently my brother did too. Among other things, this has obviously led me to consider my own mortality, especially as I have a genetic risk for the same cancer that killed my brother, as well as a chronic health problem that can develop into the same cancer that killed my mother. I now live my life on the background assumption that I could very well be dead in five years time. For the last year or so, every time I have read of a new feminist law or a new social shaming of a normal man for his sexuality (for example, the hounding of Gregg Wallace), it has left me thinking – “have I really done my bit? If I die in the next few years, can I rest in peace with the knowledge that I did all I could to fight this?” And the only honest answer I could give myself was no, I hadn’t done enough.

Another reason that I decided to resume blogging was the evident and near daily confirmation that all of my ideas, my style, my predictions, and my core ‘sexual trade union’ narrative were correct. Whilst others have been predicting the imminent arrival of ‘peak oil’ for 20 years, I had been claiming that feminists were playing exponential catchup with advances in tech that freed the sexual market, including porn tech. We’re seeing this in action nearly every day. For example, the UK has been struggling to bring in a law against deepfake porn because the tech advances so quickly that feminists keep demanding that it no longer goes far enough, and changes to the wording are needed.

My verbally confrontational and ‘shaming’ style, rather than the tried and failed for 50 years pedophile rationalist approach of others, who absurdly imagine they are ‘drawing blood with every obtuse Latin word’, has been proven correct with the rise of the incels and the ‘toxic influencers’. Most importantly, the core and dependent ideas that ‘feminists are unattractive’ and that ‘feminists are denying the truth that teen girls are hot’ has not only taken hold of manosphere cultures such as the incels, but have been ‘officially’ recognized as being the most dangerous ideas of the manosphere in a leaked Department of Homeland Security publication.

While the “hitting the wall” trend clearly perpetuates harmful stereotypes and actively
contributes to the egregious objectification and devaluation of women, we are seeing it beyond
the confines of YouTube. In incel communities, the notion of “hitting the wall” is burgeoning as a
persistent and menacing ideology within male supremacist spheres whereby they place a higher
value on younger women and girls. This pedophilic-type mindset can be seen on sites like
Incels.is that unabashedly refer to girls as young as 12 as objects of desire. This concept is also
used to undermine women’s perceived power in sexual/romantic relationship contexts, as these
male supremacists ironically imbue women with supreme power/authority over men (by
determining which men will be validated as masculine and sexually successful and which ones
will not). Simultaneously, these male supremacists want to revoke and undermine this power as
only temporary and contingent on women who maintain sexual desirability. The ‘wall’ is meant to
emphasize that self-actualized, empowered, independent women are actually less desirable than
young, naive, virgin girls and women.

The Vital Importance Of Keeping Our Message Alive In The Coming Age Of Super AI

I’ve rambled on enough already, but if you have read this far, congratulations at reaching the most important reason of all as to why I have come back. This deserves an article in itself, but the principal reason I felt it vital that I returned to blogging was that it had become clear to anybody educated on the subject that artificial intelligence is about to transform the world. We don’t have to wait another 100 years for ‘Peak Oil’ or ‘Cultural Drift’ to ‘reset society’. Society is about to undergo as much change over the next two decades as perhaps the previous two centuries put together. To any rational person, this is of course frightening. But at the same time, especially for those of us who had little hope left, it’s incredibly exciting. At the very least, it’s an opportunity.

It’s as though a homosexual in the late 1950’s, let’s say (fittingly) Alan Turing, was told that in just the next decade, society would be transformed, including not only attitudes towards sex, but the consequences of the sexual act itself. He might not know the ‘Swinging Sixties’ were around the corner, and the de-criminalization of homosexuality, only that radical changes were afoot. Perhaps he would feel that an even more puritan shift was an equally likely outcome. But he probably would have felt some excitement. It would certainly be a reason not to give up hope. This is the situation we are in, multiplied perhaps by a million.

Commentators at Eivind’s blog often talk about the only reason to even continue writing is to leave some kind of legacy for digital archaeologists of the far future to explore. Well AI is the ultimate digital archaeologist, and it has already started digging. It’s imperative that we are here, waiting to be found by it.