Autism and the Anti-Sex Hysteria Community

I’ve resolved to do a lot of things differently this time around, and perhaps above all in the way I interact with readers and other ‘anti-sex hysteria bloggers. When I read back some of my old posts, and the comments sections underneath them, I’ve often found myself cringing a little at the way I rather childishly bandied around the ‘aspie’ term as an insult.

But I did have a point, lol!

I’ve become convinced that the whole failure and futility of trying to kick start a ‘Male Sexualist’ movement can be diagnosed to a very large degree by the following:

1. Many more people than we think would agree with our views, and can see the increasing absurdity of present anti-sex laws and hysteria. But a) most have enough sense, or at least sense of self-preservation, to largely keep quiet (or even become out-and-out paedocrites), and b) those that do speak out tend to be ‘on the spectrum’, not realising the dangers and consequences of speaking out and in revealing that the emperor has no clothes.
2. This leads to a skewed demographic in the small ‘anti-sex hysteria’ commnunity – namely, most are on the spectrum. And the more vocal they are, the more likely they are to be on the spectrum.
3. This has many consequences unfavorable to creating any kind of effective ‘movement’ or opposition to anti-sex laws. Firstly, the old ‘herding cats’ thing. Individuals with aspergers tend to think they are ‘special’, and have notoriously poor social skills. This lack of understanding of ‘other minds’ also leads invariably to them to being completely inept when it comes to tactics. Secondly, it leads them to taking the words of others at face-value. This leads to ‘MAPs’ and ‘ephebophiles’ believing other men when they say that they have no interest in teenage girls, for example. Perhaps just as insidiously, it leads anti-sex hysteria rationalists to believe feminists when they say they are trying to ‘protect vulnerable women and children’, but have simply ‘gone a bit too overboard’. This I’ve chosen to mock as ‘paedo rationalism’. It’s the tactic that has been tried for the last fifty years. And if it didn’t work in the 70’s, then guess what? It wont work today.

As I mentioned in another post recently, this is all self reinforcing too – on ‘both sides’. For example, MAPs take it at face value that other men are not like them in finding ‘minors’ attractive. This leads other men (with aspergers) to look at MAPs and think – “I’m one of them!”. It also leads ‘normal’ men to strengthen their own paeodcrisy – “I’m not a MAP! Look at those MAPs – they are a minority of austic weirdos who find kids attractive! I’m not like those perverts – I’m a normal man!”

Similarly, with the paedo rationalist view that feminists are well-meaning but have just gone too far, or have been corrupted by ‘cultural drift’, or ‘American puritanism’, or the devil or whatever. This effectively legitimizes the feminist sex laws, or at least the ‘save the children and women from patriarchy’ narrative behind them – it allows feminists to frame the debate. Not only in the ‘anti-sex hysteria community’, but in society itself.

Non-aspergic individuals who have spoken out against paedohystria, almost invariably are aware both that most men find teenage girls attractive AND that female sexual jealousy is a driving force of the hysteria. But rather than starting a blog, or creating a movement, they have the ‘sense’ to voice it a little more subtly. For example, by satarizing it.

So is there any hope? Surely it is possible to ‘weaponize autism’, as 4Channers infamously claimed to be doing? No doubt those ‘on the spectrum’ do have certain strengths and assets, but I believe that when you get beyond a certain percentage that it simply becomes impossible. The 4Chan culture might have influenced the Manosphere and red pill movement and set off many memorable and effective memes, but it was never a political movement in itself and probably only a minority of 4Channers were autistic. Likewise, although many incels are aspergic, the majority are simply ugly.

So we seem to be in something of a catch-22 situation. Until it becomes even slightly ‘normalized’ to openly admit that teenagers are attractive and debate around the age of consent and related laws becomes permissible, then the anti-sex hysteria community is likely to attract mostly individuals who are in some way on the spectrum, with all the consequences that follow from that. But not all hope is lost. A handful of non-aspergic inviduals, simply angry at what feminists are doing, feel they have to speak out. I feel I am one such person (although I have aspergic qualities myself), the readers Jack and Anon69 are two others. Hopefully, more will follow.