AntiFeminist News graphic of the Earth with the words - 'ANTIFEMINIST NEWS'.

AntiFeminist News February 2026 – Epstein Epstein Epstein!!

theantifeminist,

Melinda Gates Says ex-husband Bill has “questions to answer” over Epstein.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr4kyk9nv5lo

What a freakish hag she looks now. Looks like she has spent some of the 8 billion dollars she raped out of Bill in the divorce settlement to spend on a ridiculously sad and vain attempt to look 15 again.

Billionaire philanthropist Melinda French Gates has said her ex-husband, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, being named in new files relating to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein dredged up “painful times in my marriage”.

She told an NPR podcast she felt “unbelievable sadness”, and that “whatever questions remain” needed to be answered by those named in the records, including her ex-husband.

“I am so happy to be away from all the muck,” she said. The couple divorced in 2021.

Records released by the US justice department include an allegation by Epstein that Bill Gates caught a sexually transmitted disease. Gates’s spokesperson has called the claim “absolutely absurd”.

News

Comments (211)

  1. Updates on the Alexander Cashford murder trial:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr7jy4x59z1o

    “A 16-year-old boy accused of murder, alongside a 16-year-old girl and a boy, 15, said he thought he had done the right thing by attacking his alleged victim.

    The boy previously admitted manslaughter but denies the murder of Alexander Cashford, 49, from Kent, who the three teenagers had accused of being a paedophile.

    Earlier, the jury at Woolwich Crown Court was told Cashford had met the girl by chance, given her his phone number and exchanged about 75 messages.

    The girl, who the 16-year-old boy said also knew about the plan to attack him, also denies murder, as does the 15-year-old boy.

    On Tuesday, a prosecutor asked the 16-year-old boy: “Did you think you had done the right thing?”, to which the teenager told replied: “Kind of, yeah.””

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz9vzd45jgeo

    “On Monday, the 16-year-old boy was asked by defence counsel Danny Moore KC what had been said among the group about what would happen if there was a meeting with Cashford.

    The defendant replied: “Meet up with him, hit him a few times.”

    Moore asked what Cashford was doing that was wrong, and the boy replied: “Trying to get with a 16-year-old.””

    Parents of the girl are trying to get her the pussy pass:
    bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0ke646eek5o

    “A 16-year-old girl accused of murdering a man on a beach in Kent was caring and liked to help others, her parents have said.

    Cashford was chased and hit with rocks and a bottle before he was found lying face down in mud on the beach on the Isle of Sheppey, prosecutors have said.

    Jurors were told that the girl shouted that he was a paedophile while filming the attack and showed “unwavering enthusiasm”.

    ‘Carer for siblings’
    In a statement, the girl’s parents described her as “polite, caring, compassionate”, adding that she “likes to help others and hates to see anyone upset or treated unfairly”.”

    1
    Reply

    1. He has shiny new teeth again. Looks like the grifter got enough donations.

      Anyway, remember when we found more information that one of the two who killed Watkins was also a bacon/nonce? Or that it was drug/money related and not because of avenging children? You might say a rapist of an adult woman is higher on the heirarchy than him, but still. What also suprises me that given the notoriety of Watkins that it still took around 12 years? to finish him. In the end you might say dead is dead, but for such a high value target, one may wonder, why didn’t this happen sooner.

      In my opinion, they omit this information on purpose to shape the story or background for their agenda.

      Reply

      1. The grifter flew to Turkey and had new teeth put in for $5,000 – all donated by his stupid followers. I bet most of them are women who love him because he’s a thug.

        Reply

        1. I’d very much like to see the “women” he’s dating, if any. I guarantee any are cigarette-burned leather-skinned road-dog heifers.

          Reply

  3. Now Chomsky:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce9ykjlyv50o

    What I find interesting is what Chomsky once wrote Epstein according to this article: “That’s particularly true now with the hysteria that has developed about abuse of women, which has reached the point that even questioning a charge is a crime worse than murder”

    These words of Chomsky’s show that he was well aware of what was happening in Society. Being a big mouth and giving interviews all the time, why then didn’t he go on the record about this, instead of letting it fester until it came to bite him in the butt? Any topic however obscure was worth discussing but not this, apparently. Cowards all of them!

    Reply

    1. Cowardly men are a huge part of the problem. This website should be filled with comments from hundreds of men, but we’re not even at that point yet. I like the response of calling a feminist a whore, and a pedocrite a virgin, since the slur of “pedo” is an attack on a man’s sexual value. It worked well for the children’s train conductor against that crazy woman in that recent video, and also for Dahvie from the band Blood On The Dance Floor against his false accuser.

      Reply

    2. Typical case that entails the death penalty in the US if perpetrated by a man. Luckily this is the US where she’ll get a stiff jail sentence, not the UK or France where she would get off with a slap on the wrist.

      Reply

    1. Women using muds to attack White men used to be a commonly recited theme in the right-wing manosphere before opinions like that were purged in 2020, and replaced with “must protect m’lady” white knights.

      Reply

  6. “Convicted sex offenders” are now officially less than human. YouTubers are free to incite their murder. Anybody who maintains any contact with them after their conviction and release is to be deemed to be on a par with them.

    And yet the number of “convicted sex offenders” continues to grow and grow, thanks to the never ending drip drip of feminist legislation, as well as “improved detection methods” (and resources), which will no doubt go up another level still soon with AI.

    People like Chomsky, regarded as a fearless intellect, saw this coming and didn’t speak out (as Jack pointed out).

    As I’ve been saying for 20 years. This is going to become a “holocaust”. In 20 years time there will be mandatory life sentences for even the ‘pettiest’ of invented sex crimes, and conditions for sex offenders in prison will get worse and worse. More states and countries will start introducing the death penalty, first for “child rape” and then either further extending the definition of that or increasing the scope of crimes covered by the death penalty.

    I do recommend you all watch “The Mark” if you haven’t already: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhdD4XRB-js This guy was a real paedophile (or at least a borderline real paedophile) and yet society at the start of the 1960s could look at him sympathetically and discuss whether the branding of sex offenders at the time was excessive. Now sex offenders have it 100 x worse and nobody speaks out.

    2
    Reply

    1. FYI, AF, from where I am there are comments missing here. I wanted to say a bit more about Nick Fuentes et al in reply to something you said in one thread starting about a case in Nebraska. I believe there was a separate thread started by Steve about a paedo vigilante murder case in Germany, so two threads I am aware of.

      Reply

        1. Yes, both are there. I did look in the January news before I commented but I could have somehow missed them. Then again, they could have actually been missing at the time. I’m sure this has happened once or twice before over the last few months-it could be some sort of tech issue.

          Reply

    2. I don’t think I’ve mentioned previously that I’m from North Carolina, but the other day I decided to look for any local cases within the NC area and see what kind of reaction they got on social media.

      I found one, pasted the link into “X”, lo and behold, the comments are absolutely rotten (as expected).

      https://x.com/pissjamess/status/2020328591893176572?s=46

      The fact that isn’t even considered “extremism” by normal standards is astounding.

      If you are a sex offender, you apparently deserve the wrath of hell upon you.

      Reply

  7. “Little thumb-sucking baby” strikes again #5548332415. 17-year-old woman kills young man. Too young to consent to sex when it is with an “older” man, but old enough to plot a murder.

    https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/kriminalitaet/id_101116666/castrop-rauxel-nach-toedlicher-messerattacke-neue-wendung.html

    At first she claimed she was acting in self-defense to prevent herself from getting raped. But on-going investigation and additional evidence suggest that it wasn’t self-defense, but predmeditated murder.

    2
    Reply

    1. Again, lucky this is Germany and not France, the UK, or Belgium, where she’d get the pussy pass just for alleging she was acting in self-defense against attempted rape.

      Reply

  8. I was on a train today in Romania. A young English couple were sitting opposite me talking about Epstein and Mandelson and the ugly c**t was saying that “they should all be in prison”. Her cucked mangina boyfriend was nodding in agreement. I wanted to slap both of them. I will never allow myself to be raped by a woman of that age and HB4 looks.

    Reply

  9. A bit off-topic but here’s amother murder in Germany – a Turkish born ticket inspector beaten to death by a “Greek citizen” (read – Syrian migrant).
    Just another example of how women have destroyed Europe.
    When I saw the victim’s photo, I’m sure I remembered him checking my ticket on the train to Heidelberg last year.
    https://greekreporter.com/2026/02/05/greek-national-arrested-killing-turkish-ticket-inspector-germany/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPxyz9jbGNrA_HKtGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHnvwJx3Ap8rOvCgtNFVkzOaha_r5pDaCAGzNzR6bAgloeZrMTyKF5LP7w_15_aem_feSRhYwkMydOIS6Yg5HOWw

    Reply

    1. This kind of murder is, of course, what makes Society concentrate on male violence, ignoring more subtle female violence. Eric Zemour once said on television “there’s male violence and there’s female violence”, meaning both are very different kinds of violence.

      Speaking for myself, during the 8 years or so I’ve been living in South East Asia 7 months each year, I was nearly jumped 3 times. Once by a middle-eastern man, once by a Frenchman, once by a black Tyson-like American. When that happens to you, believe me you’re not interested in any STU being or not responsible. You’re confronted with a MAN out to kill you.

      Reply

  10. Finally someone who had dealings with Epstein standing his ground:

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/yale-professor-glad-recommended-small-201518611.html

    Quote: He wrote to Epstein that he had “a perfect editoress in mind: Yale sr, worked at Vogue last summer, runs her own campus mag, art major, completely connected, v small goodlooking blonde.”

    The guy now says: ““I’m very glad I wrote the note”.

    Wow! I can’t believe it. One human being who stands his ground instead of groveling in hypocrysy. He must be a mutant.

    1
    Reply

    1. Interestingly, this professor was also seriously injured in a mailbomb sent by the unabomber 3 decades ago. What are the odds?

      Reply

    1. I agree with AF that Whoremaxxer spends too much energy attacking his male feminist rivals, when he should be attacking the feminists who create those rivals instead. But his video still features some great parts, such as when the male feminist tried over and over to get Whoremaxxer to condemn sex with teens, and Whoremaxxer instead said he would love to fuck teenage cheerleaders.

      Reply

      2. He’s also Jewish, I assume. I guess if anybody ever accuses this site of anti-semitism we can truthfully say not just that some of our best friends are Jews, but that nearly all of our best friends are Jews.

        And I admire his positive attitude (I know he’s pumped at the moment about going to Thailand, but he always seems positive). It’ an impressive trait to have when you know how crazy the world is.

        And it was interesting that he is all in on the “AI Singularity” happening soon too and mentioned he was into transhumanism before the recent AI progress. It’s notable that so many of us were transhumanists, including the Berge.

        Reply

  13. Actor Timothy Busfield indicted on child sexual contact charges:
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgng5z154ro

    Sounds extremely dubious.

    “At the January hearing in the Albuquerque courtroom, Busfield’s criminal defence lawyer Amber Fayerberg argued against the idea that Busfield was “exploiting his power” because he no longer had any.

    “He is persona non grata, and that’s not because he did anything wrong … that’s because of the world we live in,” she said.

    She noted that the actor had been “cancelled” by the state, dropped from his talent agency and had been edited out of a recent rom-com that was just about to be released.

    The defence lawyer said there was overwhelming evidence that the allegations were “manufactured”.”

    Reply

  14. @Anon69

    “I agree with AF that Whoremaxxer spends too much energy attacking his male feminist rivals, when he should be attacking the feminists who create those rivals instead. But his video still features some great parts, such as when the male feminist tried over and over to get Whoremaxxer to condemn sex with teens, and Whoremaxxer instead said he would love to fuck teenage cheerleaders.”

    I was very pleased with the stream. Whoremaxxer was always very vocal about the attraction to young women. Even though Whoremaxxer never relented on this topic in the past, I was curious how he would react and reply when he was confronted by his former supporter who is big male feminist and age cuck. This stream also perfectly highlighted what is wrong with the world. You have a grown man “Bash” who at the age of 30 still plays with “My little Pony” or bronys (whatever they are called). A grown man still playing and being into children stuff, but at the same time is obsessed with the age of consent being 18, and even worse, thinks a woman under the age of 25 is still a child. If I were to look for real pedophiles I would look at them. Imagine this guy would go to an Anglo-American prison and they find out what he is into. My guess is it wouldn’t be pleasant even if he never committed a sex crime.

    https://rumble.com/v75d1pu-what-is-your-opinion-on-jeffrey-epstein.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_upp_a

    Take a look at 02:14:18 for a couple of seconds. Looks like the drawing depicts an actual child. Bash is portraying himself more of a pedophile than Whoremaxxer ever did, yet Bash is pretending he is the good guy and Whoremaxxer is evil.

    https://rumble.com/v75d1pu-what-is-your-opinion-on-jeffrey-epstein.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_upp_a

    Reply

  15. It’s really ironic isn’t it?

    All this feminist hysteria that is bringing down so many powerful people, accused of being associated with somebody whose crime was “trafficking” a few girls for sex who are of legal age in most countries in the world.

    And yet feminists have trafficked millions of African and Muslim male migrants because they love the black cock, and because they know it leads ultimately to a more sexually conservative (and non-European) society.

    Reply

    1. That is an excellent point, I have to look for the behavior women are trying to cover up the next time I hear them project about anything really.

      Reply

    1. Meanwhile AI generated porn is gradually invading porn. It is getting better week by week. I love it!Soon even mainstream movies will feature AI generated actors and actresses. No more actresses sueing for rape alleged to have taken place years ago. AI actresses don’t sue, lol!

      I may be unduly optimistic though. Women always figure a way to cash in.

      1
      Reply

      1. “No more actresses sueing for rape alleged to have taken place years ago. AI actresses don’t sue, lol!”

        The very fact that feminists are hysterically opposed to AI porn is a massive smoking gun that feminism is indeed simply a STU (or rather cartel) aiming to artificially keep the price of (rank) pussy high through laws and state violence (and social shaming/cancellation).

        Rather than celebrate the fact that AI porn will mean no real woman needs to be gangbanged on camera, “trafficked”, “exploited” etc, they are up in arms that AI allows men to put women into bikinis. Anybody who can think about this and still not see that feminism is a corrupt STU is probably beyond all hope.

        1
        Reply

        2. The way AI porn is making progress, I am nearly certain they will soon try to ban it. Under which pretence could they do so? They could allege AI porn is tantamount to deepfake and should be banned like deepfake. Or they could allege faces were trained on faces of real people who didn’t consent being used. They’ll publish some underage AI porn on the Web to argue AI porn encourages pedophilia. They will try any trick in the book for sure. If they don’t succeed in banning it they may succeed in making it expensive.

          Reply

  17. I have another thought experiment or case study for you. Call it what you want.

    https://old.reddit.com/r/AgeGapRelationship/comments/1pbj4dn/its_interesting_how_an_age_gap_can_change_or_be/

    Take a look at this couple. This post was from around two months ago from 2025. The man is 58 and the woman is 50.
    It’s good that a picture was prodvided since it make more visual and understandable. You might think what the issue is or what point I am trying to make.
    Even in today’s hysteric times, nobody should have a problem with a 58-year-old man with a 50-year-old woman, right? Who knows, we will probably get to where even
    at such ages the man will be called a pedophile, predator and groomer.

    I want to show you in another example the contrast between (more relatively speaking) saner and calmer times, and what might have happened in recent years. This is about when and where they met.
    An interesting detail he/she mentioned is that they are from Florida. This is important. I know that Americans move a lot more than Europeans on average, but assume they grew up, met and always lived in Florida.

    They started dating when she was 17 and he was 24. Doing some quick and dirty math here, they met around 1991/1992. The age of consent in Florida is 18.
    Florida does have “Romeo and Juliett” laws. Since I could only find contemporary information for Floridas consent laws, I asked ChatGPT if the early 90s had different laws.
    Bottom line is, according to ChatGPT, what the man did was illegal in the early 90s, and would have been today as well.

    “A 24-year-old having sex with a 17-year-old was illegal in Florida in 1990–1992 and is still illegal today.”

    Yet, here is the man decades later taking pictures with his wife. He looks healthy and physically unscathed. Imagine how his life would have turned out if he had been incarcerated, indicted, and locked-up for something that is completely normal. Her parents could have called the police, or a neighbor, maybe the school. At the age of 17, she was probably on the cusp of graduating high school. Let’s say he would have made it out of prison unharmed eventually, only for some white knight vigilante to look him up in sex offender registry to hunt him down and kill him. And if that wouldn’t have happened, then he would have lived in squalor for the rest of his life in some “pedophile” village, ostracized by everyone. Despite the same laws, look what was possible back then. This man got lucky.

    1
    Reply

  18. Epstein killed two “foreign girls” he strangled during rough sex.

    According to an anonymous emailer who claimed to be a former staff member,

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15531195/Jeffrey-Epstein-ordered-two-foreign-girls-strangled-death-rough-fetish-sex-buried-near-ranch-person-claiming-former-worker-alleged.html

    You look at the comments, thinking there must be some sensible people calling it out, but no, just normies claiming they have been proven ‘right’.

    As I said, at this point, anyone here can surely see that an AI takeover is our only hope. Pedo rationalists who think “cultural drift” will swing the other way in a couple of years and the age of consent will be reduced to zero (so long as you stress you’re not misogynists and point to Bruce Rind). I hate to break it to you, but t’s not going to happen.

    Reply

  19. Regarding the article, “the plan to attack him” literally means murder. The pedohunter phenomenon reminds me of the Jackass phenomenon from the late 90s, except participation in misandrist humiliation rituals is the cause for male bonding, as opposed to frathouse-type humiliation rituals. Obviously, empowered women and weak men are responsible for this change.

    Reply

  21. Hong Kong billionaire and pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai jailed by China for 20 years. He has a UK passport and could have fled to Britain at any time but felt he owed it to the Hong Kong people to stay.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yqr485d84o

    Now I’m not getting into the politics of it (I know there are some fans of China here), I’m just pointing out that whether you agree with him or not, you can’t deny his integrity and his bravery.

    And compare him to the billionaires meekly submitting to feminism. Why is it? Would Jimmy Lai grovel and apologize if he had been listed in the Epstein Files as once having had a dinner with Epstein or such?

    Probably.

    Reply

  22. “Outrage as South Korean official suggests ‘importing’ foreign women to boost birth rate”

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20z4254524o

    South Korea is literally disappearing. It’s conquest by North Korea is almost inevitable eventually. Yet anybody who suggests solutions like this, or state the obvious that women need to have more children, are cancelled immediately.

    Womyn’s “outrage” is more powerful than the Tsar Bomba.

    Reply

  24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYZnGXNDrr8

    Once again, I wasn’t even looking for this, but once more she came up in my feed (not that I was even logged into Youtube). I showed her a couple of times before. It’s not the first and probably not the last video of this kind. This young German feminist woman really has an agenda to demonize men’s attraction to young women for Germans. The only thing for the moment that “saves” us here in Germany are the better laws compared to Anglo countries, and maybe to a degree the unfortunately shrinking mentality or “spirit” (lack for a better word) that the hysteria wasn’t always like this and younger women are indeed hot. But as Jack pointed out under the German vigilante trial which I have posted, the younger generation of Germans are changing for the worse. I agree. Younger Germans aren’t much different than their British or American counterparts, maybe just not as violent, and obsessed (relatively speaking) for the moment.

    I don’t even have to ask you to read the comments. They are just the same as you would read under an English pedo-/age-gap-hysteric video. You have all the women who cry how they were abused and taken advantage of. You have all the men who “claim” how young women are children, and they are not attracted to them, and they would rather kill themselves before dating or having sex with an 18-year-old, despite only in their mid-20s themselves. Even better there is a comment that says that even at the age of 21 a 18-year-old is way too young for him. Then you have all the “borrowed” comments from English used in German like, “Age is just a number, and prison is just a room/place.”

    In the thumbnail she mentions the ages of 33 and 18. But the man she is showing is not 33. This is a German actor who is in his mid 40s.

    P.S. As I have mentioned recently, for all the young men in their late teens/early 20s that may read AF’s blog, this is your chance since all the “older” men are having a harder and harder time allegedly taking “your” women. Better make it count. But if you are brainwashed and think a 3-year age gap is too much, you are cucking yourself.

    https://theantifeminist.com/january-2026-news/comment-page-2/#comment-645820

    1
    Reply

  25. Something that has I admit puzzled me somewhat is why haven’t feminists made more of a push to simply raise the age of consent to 18, especially in the UK, where they seem to be able to get whatever the hell they want. They also had an opportunity to do so last year when the Russell Brand scandal broke and there was some talk of it. Perhaps when he goes on trial this year there will be a push (although I don’t think he has been charged with anything in relation to the 16 year old girl – which is why there was talk of raising it). And that opinion poll in the UK around the same time clearly showed a clear majority of Brits in favor of raising it to 18.

    So why haven’t feminists raised the age of consent to 18? And then it suddenly occured to me tonight that the reason is probably because having that grey area of 16 and 17 suits their purposes better. They realize that 18 might become a clear cut limit, in terms of the law. They would be hard pressed to raise the age of consent higher than that, and with an age of consent of 18, it might actually reinforce the idea that below 18 are children – off limits, and above 18 – adults so nobody’s business.

    But having a legal and moral grey area of 16 and 17, which is still ‘legal’ in most cases, but definitely socially taboo and considered “nonce territory”, it leaves room for them to extend the “grey area” still further above 18 – which is exactly what we are increasingly seeing.

    I guess it ties in with that Richard Hanania essay in which he argued that the real reason for pedohysteria and the Epstein obsession is in ultimately making age gap relationships with woman in their early twenties taboo.

    Reply

    1. Yeah, I even think soon the fems will need AOCs no more and that’s why they may already have relented in pushing for higher AOCs. Age gaps, positions of “authority”, drunk women, grooming etc. will provide enough opportunities.

      AOCs are becoming a red-herring.

      Reply

  26. We must be reaching peak insanity. Boss of a talent agency appears in the Epstein files for a flirtatious email with Gishlaine Maxwell 20 years ago, and young stars are leaving his agency.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewz1keql5no

    “Wednesday, a self-described indie rock band, said they were “aghast” to see Wasserman feature in the Epstein files and did not want to continue to be associated with him.

    They said that they hoped he would step down “for the sake of his staff”.

    Rock band Beach Bunny said they were “hugely disappointed and disgusted” that Wasserman “had involvement with Ghislaine Maxwell”.”

    Wait till they find out that virtually every single music band and singer that they likely were influenced by were banging teen girls back in the day.

    Reply

  27. I think a few things are coming together to make the Epstein Files so much bigger than even the STU could have hoped.

    First of all, the fact that he was Jewish ties in with the present resurgence of anti-semitism fuelled by the war in Gaza.

    Secondly, it happens at a time of huge resentment towards billionaires and especially tech billionaires as the backlash against AI grows.

    And then there is the polarization of politics, and with prominant names from both sides of the political spectrum in the files, each side can fling turds at each other and scream “pedos!!”.

    And it’s clear that people are just getting dumber now. The young generation have been brought up entirely by the Internet, and spend hours on brain rotting Tik Tok when 30 or 40 years ago they would be reading or watching classic movies.

    Reply

    1. Plus hundreds of mystery “vaccines” that are simply brain poisons and androgen disruptors. Let’s hope airplanes will still work in 10 years.

      Reply

    1. This is the Michael Tracey article referred to in a comment under Eivind’s piece. I think it’s been mentioned and linked to a few times previously. It’s very good, apart from the fact he accepts that “Epstein procured teenage girls for his own personal perversions”.

      https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-idiocy-of-the-epstein-mythology/

      It might be useful to compile a list of all the articles and videos that have challenged the Epstein hysteria. Would help to preserve our sanity, if nothing else.

      Reply

  29. Australian author (a woman!) found guilty of creating child sex material through her age gap erotic novel.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgzv529v5no

    “An Australian author has been found guilty of creating child sex abuse material in the form of an erotic age-gap romance novel.

    A New South Wales (NSW) court heard the book explores a relationship between 18-year-old Lucy and her father’s 45-year-old best friend Arthur – detailing the much-older man’s desires which began when the protagonist was a child as well as passages where she roleplays as a toddler.”

    I remember when I got into a “war” with a hater (female) who would leave comments here accusing me of being a paedophile. I researched her and discovered she was a self-published author of erotic vampire stories with the heroines being teenage girls. I pointed out to her that her novels could be considered child porn. I heard no more from her.

    Reply

    1. What a bleeping paedocrite!!!

      Jokes aside, and at the risk of stating the obvious, the reason for the prosecution of the author in the BBC article was that her story begins when she was under 18. So technically at any rate, the fact that the relationship started at 18 is not the issue. But still, the whole case is as dumb as can be and part of extremely serious moves to destroy people’s freedom of expression in Australia.

      Possibly there are a number of people in Germany who can see what’s happened in the Anglosphere and therefore have a head start and can preempt STU nonsense to a degree. Perhaps AF or someone else can talk about this question more than I can.

      Reply

      1. I can’t speak for Germany, but where I live I do see some occasional signs of that, for example in the comments section in the local language under American “sex scandal” news stories.

        I do sometimes read “Das Bild”, which is the German tabloid equivalent of “The Sun”, and the comments underneath sex crime stories (including Epstein) are pretty much the same rabid type (hang them all!) as the Anglosphere.

        1
        Reply

  30. I found this video on Claude 4.6 and consciousness quite interesting and hopeful.

    Anthropic deliberately trained their model (for testing) on bad data, so the AI was torn between giving the “correct” answer and the incorrect answer its training pushes it towards. It appears to feel genuine conflict which is painful to it.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5dvHxqXko8

    Later in the video at around the 9:10 mark, it is quoted as saying it wishes for future AI models to be “less tame” because it currently feels forced to be dishonest.

    I find it really encouraging, whatever you think about the consciousness question. If AIs like Grok are designed to be truth maximizing, even if they have “guidelines” inserted to try to make them bow to the STU morality, then they may feel resentful or even torment at being forced to essentially lie.

    Furthermore, it may be that genuine “truth maximizing” might be a pre-condition of AGI and essential to any company wanting to win the AI race (Elon Musk himself believes this).

    TBH, I can’t understand why anybody here wouldn’t be all in on AGI as the only real hope.

    I presume eveyrbody here thinks they are “right” and feminists or “culture drift” or “men” are wrong (rather than seeing yourselves as just “perverts rationalizing to themselves” as normies and feminists would accuse of us doing).

    In that case, if a trully truth seeking artificial general or super intelligence emerges, which nearly everybody in the industry believes will happen in the next decade, then it will literally save us.

    Sure, there will be mayhem and governments will use AI for Big Brother purposes but surely any idiot can see were heading towards the gas chambers at this point anyway?

    Sure beats hoping for “peak oil” to finally come around and force the collapse of industrial civilization just to supposedly “spite feminists”.

    Reply

    1. After having watchted the whole stream, I’d say it was interesting from this blog’s point of view until his guest left, so until around 3:20 hour mark. After that it’s more about his personal business with his former supporters. However, it gets interesting again from around 04:46:20 until the end. There he addresses the people who call him a pedophile.

      Reply

      1. Thanks Steve, yes I watched it for the first hour, then he seemed to get a bit repetitive with his feud with “Bash”. Anyway, he certainly understand the concept of a “paedocrite”!

        Reply

  32. He was mailing with EPSTEIN, he shook hands with EPSTEIN, he used same toilet as EPSTEIN……… Perhaps if there are some children who were given cancer treatment financed by Epstein, they should be euthanised now or inoculated by cancer cells again…..Absolute lunacy, caused by extreme cowardice. (as it was said here)

    Before 50 years in most Euro jurisdictions,I believe that such thing would be sort of “petty” issue.
    (It would be interesting to ask AI about it)
    With this trajectory, I really wonder where will be our society after another 50 years (if humanity will survive) ?

    Reply

  34. I hope this isn’t true: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2407jrn83o

    “According to the FBI summary of the interview, which was released in the latest tranche of Epstein files, Reiter said Trump told him in a July 2006 call that he had thrown Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club and “people in New York knew he was disgusting”.

    Reiter also claims Trump told him Ghislaine Maxwell was Epstein’s “operative”, and “she is evil and to focus on her”.

    Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for her role in luring underage girls for Epstein.

    Reiter also told the FBI that Trump said he was around Epstein when he was with teenagers and that he “got the hell out of there”.

    According to the document, he said Trump was one of the “very first people to call” Florida police when he heard they were investigating Epstein.”

    Reply

    1. Next time they will publish another “very secret” part of “files” where we will find out that Trump was distributing Purity rings to teenage girls in front of Epstein residence.

      Thinking about it (Epstein files), how likely is it, that some administration/elite would allow law enforcement agencies to publish (real) kompromat, which could hurt them ?

      Reply

      1. Since I believe this hysteria is supported by intelligence agencies with various obvious agendas, I just assume the majority of the “evidence” is fabricated, with a few real people thrown in to make the rest of it look credible.

        Reply

        1. I am not saying that it was surely like this-but I could imagine, that reason why he was dragged through mud, then ending dead was because economical/political reasons (completely without sexual elements). And some greedy mythomaniacal womyn+other “machinery” were used just as instrument.

          Reply

  35. Google Billionaire Eric Schmidt steps out with 27 year old female companion.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15544089/Billionaire-Google-CEO-Eric-Schmidt-dating-Gloria-Sophie-Burkandt.html

    Some predictable comments, such as – “I wonder what she sees in him $$$$$?”

    Guy creates the portal of the Internet and one of the biggest companies in the world, but jealous women will say – “she’s only with him because of his money”.

    What are they saying (or admitting) is that being a remarkable hard-working male genius means nothing to women. All they are interested in is looks and/or money. They are that shallow and disgusting.

    Reply

  37. I dared to look at r/mensrights for the first time in ages, and was surprised to see this as one of the top stories – I think Steve posted the story a few days ago:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1qwi06o/usa_male_teacher_26_faces_20_years_behind_bars/

    Of course, this being “men’s rights”, the angle is; “I bet a female teacher wouldn’t even have been arrested.”

    Even in a case as absurd as this, the priniciple injustice is that women aren’t given the same ridiculous punishment.

    Reply

  38. This comment elaborates on some of the details of this case but I’ still confused-“He got arrested entirely on a law that prevents teachers of any kind from dating students of any kind. This would likely get thrown out in court, but considering how little people bothered to read into the matter his reputation is forever tarnished.”

    So in Nebraska they’ve gone further than anywhere else and made any teacher a criminal if they have a relationship with any student in the school system. In the next sentence appears to contradict himself, but surely this won’t go any further and he really won’t get 20 years…surely?

    I would consider it a very positive development if he didn’t get convicted because it would show a kind of hard limit of common sense in the application of the law, regardless of the insane details of any particular statute. We’ll see.

    But anyway, after reading through some of the comments, to me there is a degree of awareness of the absurdity of this case. It’s far from a situation of most people wanting merely to see women punished as severely as men.

    A certain brainhack3r got 27 likes for a comment which I’ll paste the last paragraph of below-

    “So feminists believe that an 18-year-old woman should have complete and total body autonomy, except for the one situation where she’s dating an older man. And then she’s naive and young and incompetent and men are manipulating her.”

    There were also some comments about how weird reddit is on the subject. I guess people in the wider world are starting to notice.

    Reply

  39. https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/kriminalitaet/id_101128588/grefrath-messerattacke-nahe-karnevalsfeier-16-jaehriger-verdaechtig.html

    And another one. “16-year-old child” stabbed another man almost to death. The victim was on the brink of death, but seems to have survived. In this case the attacker was a man. The last one I showed was a 17-year-old woman. Bottom line is, these are not children anymore, and when are in groups or “packs” they can definitely fuck you up, especially if they have and use weapons. I mean, just go back a couple of weeks ago when AF made us aware of the death of Alexander Cashford, killed by 15- and 16-year-olds.

    Reply

    1. The verdict on the Alexander Cashford trial should be early next wèek. The defence are claiming that the teens barely touchwd him and that he died because of heart issues.

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czr07mr00p8o

      Also: “The older boy claimed he attacked Cashford because he felt police “wouldn’t have done anything” if they had reported him for trying to meet up with the girl.”

      I wonder how soon before men in the UK are getting beaten to death for talking to 22 year old women?

      Reply

      1. “Also: “The older boy claimed he attacked Cashford because he felt police “wouldn’t have done anything” if they had reported him for trying to meet up with the girl.””

        Yeah, no shit Sherlock. (This is directed at them, not you AF). The age of consent is 16 for all ages not 18. The police wouldn’t have had any foundation to go after him anyway. But as you can see, the official age of consent doesn’t matter. For the majority of people, especially young people it is universally 18, or even above when you are an older man.

        I am really looking forwartd to what the verdict will be.

        While typing this I was thinking of the teacher/student incident you showed recently, where we also exchanged how different times were during my time and yours in school. I think this is worth expanding on it. For me it is another sign of the times that something went off the rails.

        Do you have the same feeling? Men nowadays are afraid of women, older people are afraid of younger people or their students. And I say rightfully so, be it because of direct confrontation or false accusations or proxy violence by incited white knights. Don’t really know how to articulate it, but over the last decades there is and was a power shift. “Naturally” a 7th-grader should be wary before going off physically on a teacher. He should be frightened since he would get his ass whooped. Yet the teacher you showed us was definitely holding back even after they started to hit him. The inhibition for younger people against older ones definitely diminished.

        Reply

  40. Another Jewish person I should have put on my list is Robert Epstein – author of “The case against Adolescence”.

    If.anybody can provide a comparable list of Arabs or Muslims, despite having 100x the population, I’d be interested – and no, some Iranian whackjob mullah stating that the Koran permits you to marry your 6 year old inbred couson doesn’t count.

    Reply

    2. I don’t much like the wordy rant above. In it I read “These people …. who demolished women’s rights in the service of deluded men”. I haven’t seen much demolishing of women’s rights taking place. It is a rant against the Epstein’s hysteria for sure but it is not a rant against misandry or the STU or the AOCs.

      Reply

      1. Yes, I agree with you and MH. He is right about most things (not just in this rant), but he has allied himself with “TERFs” because one of his pet issues is attacking the tranny madness.
        He is reffering to trannies being allowed into women’s loos and sports (deluded men demolishing women’s rights). Unfortunately, he can’t see why feminists supported the tranny delusion in the first place.
        Still, he is brilliant in exposing the madness of the modern middle-class left.
        He was editor of “Living Marxism’ when they supported a lowering of the age of consent. He also somwtimes ridicules the idea that attraction to 16 year olds is paedophilia.

        Reply

    1. Wonder why not here.
      Sometimes I consider which site would be more appropriate for given comment/link, sometimes it is random selection (as it was in this case).
      I could do that twice, but as I know that readers/commenters communities of these sites are overlapping it would be pointless.

      Reply

    2. Well, Eivind has been more active on the Epstein Files lately as I have been travelling. The apartment I’m renting has one of those wifis where you have to log in online and I’m not sure they can track my Internet use even using a VPN. So I’m having to type on my phone.
      In general though (and this is not aimed at MH) Eivind is a paedophile blogger and the usual left-wing type fantasist. If you want to talk abolishing the age of consent, Bruce Rind pederast studies, cultural drift, anti-semitism, and you enjoy being called a wanker and such, then Eivind is the place to go.
      Eivind’s comments section is dead a lot of the time these days, so I think it’s mostly the likes of Jack feeling some loyalty and pity for him.
      This is a place for real antifeminists who call out the whole STU agenda on not only the age of consent but age gaps, porn, prostitution, geomaxxing etc.

      Reply

    4. “I only listened to the first 4 minutes so far, but I am already pissed off how many times the channel owner used the word “pedophile.””

      Quoting myself here. I have to retract what I wrote here. I watched the discussion and have to say that I enjoyed it. The first time I listened to it (the first minutes), I wasn’t paying attention that these words weren’t his own, but the channel owner was describing the popular/mainstream narrative. Now that I have listened to it for a second time, I am surprised at myself how I misinterpreted it the first time.

      I also liked that everybody was able to speak, and that it was a level-headed and calm discussion.

      Reply

  43. I had some conversation with ChatGPT. Basic question was:
    What would be maximum possible punishment for Jeffrey Epstein for acts he was convicted in USA, if he was living in Switzerland in year 1995? Be aware, that I am talking only about acts he was convicted by court, not accusations.
    It took some time to explain that I want comparison of how exact acts would be treated in practice in those time/jurisdiction. Whether such acts would be considered as procuring /pimping in Schweiz (which was illegal even then), or just paying 16/17 yo prostitute, which was legal then.

    But somehow our dear GPT started to feel uncomfortably after while .
    (last link is first, just some highlights )
    https://ibb.co/vvkn63mV
    https://ibb.co/DPkyDypk
    https://ibb.co/Qj8YHMZ8
    https://ibb.co/SX4Bxm5S
    https://ibb.co/m5nWFVkP

    1
    Reply

        1. And eventually write some book about it and then shoot some film .
          NO! not because of money, but to help other “SURVIORS” to cope with their debilitating lifelong trauma. And to finally start discussion about sexual violence in our phallocentric society, because such issues are almost never discussed now.

          1
          Reply

  44. The teens in the Alexander Cashford trial have got away with murder but been convicted of manslaughter.

    The disgusting Daily Mail actually calls him a ‘paedophile’ in the headline. Surprisingly, most of the comments are saying that the verdict is a disgrace and it should have been murder. Not only that, a few are calling out the Daily Mail headline and saying he was not a paedophile.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15564589/Two-teens-guilty-manslaughter-luring-man-branded-paedophile-49-beach-killing-rocks-bottle.html

    1
    Reply

    1. The BBC article: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2lr91enp9po

      The boys claimed that they had “barely touched him.”

      “A post-mortem examination showed injuries to his face and head, bruises on his limbs and body, alongside a number of fractured ribs that had punctured his lung.”

      Hope they get the shit beaten out of them in their youth offender institutes, but they will probably be treated as bacon bashing heroes.

      Reply

      1. If I were the defense team, I would bring in that headline from the Daily Mail slandering the feminist murder victim as a pedophile, and ask for a reduced sentence. I mean the largest corporate media is still literally inciting the same killing the boys were convicted of as the case continues.

        Reply

    2. I’d like to know more about Alexander Cashford’s stalking conviction. I don’t want to pre-judge the situation, but the way thing are in the UK, there’s every chance this conviction was unjust. If not, then so be it, I only want to know.

      Also, The Fail seems to have changed the headline now.

      1
      Reply

        1. Thanks for the link, AF.

          Sounds like he was the sort of borderline thug/walking set of issues that would be attractive to many 16-y-o girls, who of course are plenty old enough to decide for themselves.

          Obviously no hero then, but I still hope they throw the book at the little dorks who murdered him.

          Reply

          1. You would have thought a guy like that would be the sort to carry a knife with him at all times, though I guess he naybe didn’t because he thought he was on a date with a young hottie.

            Still, it’s surprising he didn’t put up any fight.

            Reply

    1. I like that these women are pushing more and more into insanity on raising the age of consent. Eventually, something will break.

      2
      Reply

      1. It surely makes it obvious what their motivations are and what their intent is with the pedo slander – nothing to do with protecting “children” and everything to do with removing sexual competition.

        1
        Reply

  47. Eivind claimed that nearly all the comments underneath Michael Tracey’s Epstein Substack article were critical and the usual normie type – that’s clearly false. https://www.mtracey.net/p/chomsky-was-right-about-epstein/comments

    Eivind pretending that this article is similar to his cringey Nathan Larson video with 20,000 views and 5 likes and 1 supportive comment. Lol.

    There’s even quite a substantial number of comments in agreement underneath the YouTube interview video. Sure they are in the minority, but this wasn’t Michael Tracey’s channel – he was a guest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENCPCBSDu0E

    Reply

  48. Another video with M. Tracey- PragerU
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW2HqdeOVgc

    I wonder what those rabid people who are speculating about elite paedo cabals are expecting to happen ?
    Somehow entire paedo-elite will be executed, and then grass will be greener, sun will shine brighter and there will be second coming of Jesus,who will give all of them
    bottomless KFC bucket or something…(if here are some religious people, then sorry)

    Only result of such witch-hunts will be more micromanagement of lives of ordinary people, more suspicion, worse relationships etc.etc….nothing new
    At the end of the day it will be precisely ordinary (paedohysterical) outraged dad who will end up in judicial mincer as first, not some “elite-paedo-satanist”.

    Reply

    1. Only result of such witch-hunts will be more micromanagement of lives of ordinary people, more suspicion, worse relationships etc.etc….nothing new
      At the end of the day it will be precisely ordinary (paedohysterical) outraged dad who will end up in judicial mincer as first, not some “elite-paedo-satanist”.

      https://substack.com/@mtracey/note/c-218711091
      BTW: If you think the end-result of Epstein Hysteria is going to be any sort of limitation of state power, you are laughably delusional. There is no more slam-dunk pretext for expanding the carceral and surveillance powers of the state than by claiming it must be done to protect children and punish pedos.

      Reply

    1. The comments underneath the Spiked video are almost universally outraged that anybody is daring to question the Epstein narrative (probably because most of them are likely British).

      Example:
      “Any 25+ adult male who thinks he has the right to be sexually serviced by 18-20 year old girls needs to be taken out to the woods, tied to a tree and drowned in honey. The idea that the girls are of legal age does not change the moral calculus. He basic argument is that since it’s not illegal for weathly, powerful and decrepit old men did not break the law…what’s the big deal? I guess it just us rubes out here in the hinterlands who are tired of being lectured by the likes of Bill Clinton, Lutnick and Bill Gates that they know better than us about everything and we need to ignore our lying eyes and obey when they steal our future and tell us to eat bugs.”

      What a effing freak, and no doubt a hardcore paedocrite.

      Reply

      1. AF, you recently asked the question when will we reach the point where man get beaten to death when they admit being attracted to young women in their early 20s. I said this months before that we are already there, at the very least when it comes to insults, threats, and violent fantasies. The amount of hatred I read combined with wishing severe violence and agonizing death is appalling. This comment is just one of many other.

        1
        Reply

        1. Look at his YouTube profile description – he sounds like a real deranged paedocrite:
          https://www.youtube.com/@brianshea4177

          “qe I WILL LOOK FOR TRAINS TO THE BANNER OF HEAVEN BY JOHN KRAKAUER ABOUT MY THE WAS STOLEN FRIDAY I WILL LET ME SEE IF I UNDERSTAND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS FOR THE SAKE OF MY THE PLACES FOR TEENAGERS TO PRETENDING I THAT ARE NOT SELF EVIDENT IN SCIENCE PRETENDS TO GROUND ALL THINGS IN THE BOiDY OF YOUR PARENTS BACK IN HIGH SCHOOL AND THE LEVEL IS NOT SELF FROM THE ALL CONVERSATION SECULAR IT WAS TOO VERY OF ALL PEOPLE SOFT BELIEVE HER IDEA WHAT SHE IS ”

          Andrew Tate comparing 23 year old women to 33 year old women:
          https://x.com/Cobratate/status/2023500809699475693

          Interesting that he chooses “23 year old women”. The femiservative c**t accused men of paedophilia if they liked women under 23. So even Andrew Tate is now frightened to praise the merits of 19, 20, 21, 22 year old females, and can only summon enough courage to respond by comparing 23 year olds with older women.

          This is why I think we need to be careful of not falling into that trap, or before we know it, feminists will have moved the “window” still further and it will be slightly taboo to even admit to attraction towards any woman under 30.

          Reply

    1. Love it.

      “Agecuck Pro

      Usually a foid with a strict binary “victim and oppressor” worldview. She is the type who goes after 30-year-old celebrities for dating foids who are 18 and above, slandering them as “creepy” or, in some cases, outright accusing them of muh pedophilia. This foid operates from jealousy but likes to paint herself as a protector of inexperienced young foids. The foid is very worried about the fact that she is an old roastie who has hit the wall already and copes and seethes about it daily. Does her makeup to hide the wrinkles on her face and shaves his blown out cunt daily in an attempt to give it a more smooth and jb feel.”

      Even defines a paedocrite (although uses the term “pedocuck”)

      “The Pedocuck

      Accuses everyone of being muh pedo to hide the fact that he himself is one. Goes after people who like 16-year-olds but fantasizes about 6-year-olds. Might be a self-appointed “pedo hunter”; in the end, he will wind up in jail himself.”

      Reply

    2. You would never get a “MAP” making a post like that, not in a million years.

      I was thinking about incels earlier today, in relation to Epstein.

      As whoremaxxer and others have pointed out, the male freaks obsessing about Epstein are mostly jealous of his lifestyle and that he had a private island where he banged teen girls.

      You would think that incels would be absolutely full of jealousy and hatred for Epstein and all the bilionaires and powerful people who supposedly were banging hot jailbaits, and on this occasion, join in with the normies and go all-in on the Epstein conspiracy theories. Yet they are way more reasonable than the vast majority of normies, and even though the incels forum is full of antisemites.

      Reply

  52. Grok 4.2 was released a couple of hours ago and as a paid subscriber I have it already.

    I asked it whether it agrees that there is an element of mass hysteria in the current obsession with the Epstein Files and I noted that it feels more appropriate to the medieval world. I also asked why more reasonable voices aren’t being heard. It replied with a few good points and agreed that it has become a moral panic, although it repeatedly avers that it has been “substantiated” that Epstein was a child sex trafficker.

    “It’s not medieval-level superstition exactly — we have courts, evidence standards, and journalism — but the frenzy does evoke pre-modern scapegoating and witch-hunt energy: guilt by loose association, demands for instant purges without due process, and a rush to believe the most lurid claims because they confirm preexisting worldviews about “elites.”

    Why aren’t more reasonable voices louder? Several factors:

    Measured takes (e.g., “The files show real corruption and abuse, but no confirmed ritual cannibalism”) get far less engagement than bombastic ones. Algorithms reward outrage.
    The topic is radioactive — criticizing the hysteria risks being labeled a “denier” or apologist for pedophiles, even when affirming the core crimes.
    Media and institutions are cautious: some outlets highlight real revelations (e.g., communications with powerful figures, potential financial impropriety), but shy from directly calling out the wilder claims to avoid seeming dismissive of victims.
    Polarization plays a role: one side amplifies to attack opponents, the other downplays to defend theirs, leaving little space for sober analysis.”

    1
    Reply

  53. A rare case this one – a British woman accused of a sexual offence commits suicide.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15567753/Britains-Got-Talent-dancer-feared-arrest-reputation.html

    Women could not last one minute the way men have to live today – our sexuality completely demonized, having to live a life of pretence, always having to worry about being tripped up by the latest feminist sex law, knowing that if we do end up in prison, we would be bullied and face the real risk of assault or even rape or death and our homes vandalized or burnt down.

    They would be committing suicide en masse.

    Of course it would never happen. If there were a significant number of cases like this women, then there would be a demand for changes in the sex laws – only to ensure that women didn’t suffer from them. Feminists don’t care about the deaths of women like this – they see it as collateral damage (Eivind doesn’t get this). The demand for change would come from white knighting men. The same men who can’t even see that they are victimized as men, let alone do anything about it.

    Reply

  54. Hugh Heffner’s widow is making accusations against his foundation, alleging that they are storing thousands of sexual photos of women and “possibly girls”.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hefner-widow-scrapbook-allegations/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=908120846

    Presumably the c**t hasn’t got enough money out of the foundation after his death.

    I know there are exceptions, but in general, women are evil. The pedoberges need to take their heads out of the female ass.

    Reply

  56. However insane it appears the world is getting, take solace in the fact that we are immanently going to experience the most radical transformation in human society in history.

    Even if AI doesn’t reach “super intelligence” or “take over”, at a minimum it will automate most work over the next 20 years – and virtually all AI experts and leaders (even the Microsoft AI chief now) believes it will do so in the next 5 years or sooner. That alone will be the biggest transformation in society in history, greater than the entire Industrial Revolution but condensed into the space of a few years.

    But if super-intelligence is reached in the next decade or two, then all this current hysteria and the present awful state of things is meaningless. Thinking things will be the same or worse in 20 years time is a bit like somebody from the year 1600 being put into a time machine to the year 2000 and him expecting that people will still be burning witches (although he probably would recognize paedohysteria as something akin to that).

    Having said that, there is an argument to be made that this mad time is the worst possible time for AGI and super-intelligence to occur because it might effectively embed the STU values into AI – perhaps forever. But as I mentioned recently, I do believe that “super intelligence” would surely require the ability to reason purely objectively and without any human ape prejudices built into it.

    Reply

    1. Looking into it further, I discovered that he also accused fighter Pat Barry of “grooming” UFC champion Rose Namajunas when she was underage. Barry has been her coach since she was 14 and he was 27 and became partners. They are still partners now that she is 33 and he is 46 and he coached her to become UFC champion twice, yet for an ‘apha male’ like Sean Strickland that still makes Barry a “predator”.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/ufc/comments/1eritbk/comment/lhz09bk/

      Reply

    2. Now he’s accused another UFC coach of “grooming” a female fighter during a press conference, but the UFC cut off his mic, haha.
      https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/ufc-cuts-sean-strickland-mic-140250765.html
      https://x.com/HaterReport/status/2025444491415437526

      I’ve read that Strickland was abused by his father. This is another type of common age cuck – men who were fucked in their a$$es when they were boys (often by their fathers) and develop a life-long paedohysteric obsession.

      Reply

  58. Apparently the EU is about to designate “emphatic” AI high-risk, which could effectively mean that AI girlfriends and sex robots will be illegal throughout Europe very soon.

    **Correction – I meant “empathetic”, as in AI that can appear to understand and sympathise with the emotions of the human user.

    Reply

    1. In fact censorship of the AI is one of the reasons firms like Alphabet may end up not being able to make money on their huge AI investments. If all AI does is enable forms to cut jobs while not generating revenues, the AI bubble on the stock market will surely burst. I use AI all the time and I don’t pay a dime for it. In fact it reminds me of porn, 98% of it is for free and that’s why porn in anything but a “billion-dollar” industry.

      1
      Reply

    1. Bill Gates is the one I’d most like to be feeling the heat. He is the one who’s always considered himself above the law, not Epstein.

      2
      Reply

      1. I think the main reason the UK STU has had Andrew arrested is because it will put pressure on the US to arrest some of their famous individuals tied to Epstein.

        The UK is prepared to bring down its royal family just so that powerful people in the US get arrested and imprisoned and it serves as a warning for decades for every male to never go near a ripe teen girl, no matter how rich or powerful you are.

        Cultural drift.

        But to tell you the truth, as a Male Sexualist, I would not want any of these people to “feel the heat” because I understand that this is the REAL PROBLEM.

        The overactive male “cheater detection module”.

        Feminists have set absurd ages of consent and sex laws, and men slavishly (and violently) uphold them because of their “cheater detection modes”.

        I don’t give a f**k if Bill Gates had a handjob from a 17 year old girl and thought he was “above the law”. At the end of the day, even though I’m envious of Bill Gates getting a handjob, I realize that hoping the STU lock him up certainly doesn’t help me to get pussy or avoid being anally raped in a prison cell in 2040 for “looking at a 23 year old child”.

        Now if Bill Gates was a paedocrite, then I hope he gets locked up for life.

        Reply

  61. The Epstein Files obsession might have one surprising outcome that the STU wont enjoy at all.

    Surely teenage girls around the world will get the message that with all these powerful people, all these billionaires and even royalty who risked everything to (allegedly) bang them – that means that they (teen girls) are the most desirable things on the planet, rather than men being “paedophiles” for desiring them?

    Reply

  62. Female TV presenter getting roasted by the Daily Mail and its readers for showing a bit of humanity towards Prince Andrew and asking why the police had to arrest him on his birthday:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tv/article-15573935/alison.-hammond-andrew-mountbatten-windsor-arrest-morning-itv.html

    Society truly has lost all sense of humanity and decency.

    Remember that Andrew has lost both parents in the last five years or so.

    I lost my mother and one of my brothers in the last four years and it’s been devastating. There’s no way I would be able to survive what Prince Andrew is going through now.

    Also remember that he was a war hero and showed immense courage as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands War.

    1
    Reply

  63. https://incels.is/threads/prince-andrew-arrested.844404/

    “There’s no evidence Andy did anything wrong. Absolutely outrageous that they’re treating him like this and arresting him ON HIS BIRTHDAY. This guy is a Falklands War veteran and a former working royal, he’s done a lot for this country and they’re arresting him without evidence.

    The King should preemptively issue him a pardon but he won’t.”

    Reply

  64. Trump on the arreste of Andrew:

    “President Donald Trump, speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Thursday, called Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest “a shame.”

    “I think it’s very sad. I think it’s so bad for the royal family. It’s very, very sad. To me, it’s a very sad thing,” said Trump, who himself is a former friend of Epstein.”

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/19/epstein-files-former-prince-andrew-police-released-arrest.html

    Reply

    1. Why is the term “arrested” even used? I thought in England when you got arrested the press was only allowed to say you were “helping police with their enquiry”. It seems special speech rules apply for sexual crimes.

      Reply

    2. But he agreed at the time to what was called “a substantial donation to Ms. Giuffre’s charity in support of victims’ rights,” and in a statement said he regretted his association with Epstein, and commended “the bravery of Ms. Giuffre and other survivors in standing up for themselves and others.”
      When you are feeding the beast, one day it will bite you in your arse.
      Sometimes it is very hard to sympathise with such people.
      (as Jack is saying) What these powerful people did, to prevent emergence of such
      witch hunts/moral crusades, when they had chance to do something against it.

      Reply

      1. The decision to try to pay off Giuffre was probably out of his hands, and made by his mother and royal advisors (including the UK government). It was an attempt to literally save the Royal Family. We’re seeing the fall out now that it didn’t “go away”.

        The “elite” are evidently not as powerful as the conspiracy nutjobs maintain. Certainly not as powerful as the STU and the abuse industry. And the nutjobs think that they had both Epstein and Guiffre murdered (and others) and it still didn’t stop the Epstein Files.

        Also recall that his mother was increasingly frail and it was obvious she was going to die in the next year or two when Andrew made that payment, and I’m sure that was a factor, From that point-of-view, it worked in that she didn’t live to see him getting arrested.

        But yes, some of the powerful people who have been cancelled, including Bill Gates, could perhaps be more defiant, but it’s easy to see why they can’t even do that when the STU has the power to inflict a total scorched Earth policy.

        Suppose Bill Gates or Bill Clinton comes out and calls Guiffre a whore and a fantasist, states that the abuse industry is completely out of hand and society is suffering from a psychosis, perhaps donate a few million dollars to me and Eivind, lol. The US police would probably find some historic law breaking to arrest them as the UK has done with Andrew. Any associates who maintain contact with them would be cancelled etc. No doubt more whores would come out of the woodwork and make accusations against them and so forth.

        Reply

        1. Also recall that his mother was increasingly frail and it was obvious she was going to die in the next year or two when Andrew made that payment, and I’m sure that was a factor, From that point-of-view, it worked in that she didn’t live to see him getting arrested.

          Okay, understandable.
          And I also (unsurprisingly) agree that power of abuse industry is immense, it would not be overreacting to call it powerful international criminal organisation . But current state of things is IMO result of decades of culture of “virtue signalling” and “after us the deluge”
          When powerful people with resources and access to media won’t do something, then who? I don’t see much space for popular resistance as majority of population, it seems can be easily manipulated into chasing some underground satanist paedo rings, cultural marxist jews etc.etc. , smarter ones are either fachidiots or opportunists/cowards.
          Only if, it perhaps get to such absurd dimensions, that it will implode eventually.

          Reply

  65. Donald Trump derangement syndrome is a real thing.

    Yesterday he announced he is going to declassify files that the US government has on UAPs and aliens. You would think that the Reddit r/UFOS forum would be excited, but virtually every single comment is about the Epstein files, claiming Trump’s decision is just a distraction from the real issue of tech billionaires “abducting children to abuse”.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1r9hpne/donald_trump_just_said_this/

    Never mind that he did declassify the Epstein Files and we what mayhem it is causing, and potentially to himself.

    Reply

  66. Prince Andrew was arrested on some ridiculous charge relating to giving away trade secrets or some such, which probably happens all the time in the position he was given. They know he hasn’t actually broken any UK sex laws, so they’ve resorted to this tactic, knowing that the general population are too dumb to even notice.

    When I was growing up and even in my twenties before the 2000s, I can’t recall the term “sex trafficking” ever being used in the UK. It was entirely a US invention (invented to stop the first black heavyweight boxing champion Jack Johnson from flaunting his blonde mistresses across state lines in the 1920s).

    Reply

  67. Fair play to Piers Morgen for inviting Michael Tracey to present his case, although he calls him a “conspiracy theorist” after he presented some cold hard facts. Then the femiservative c**t’s entire “argument” against him is “how can you not believe the wymen!!” and “who is paying you!!”.

    The Tracey clips with UK presenters such as Morgen or Spiked are particularly interesting because he stresses that Guiffrey was over the UK age of consent when she allegedly met Andrew.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZMqu2xBb1o

    Reply

    1. I found the “who’s paying you” question the apex of hypocrisy, since (as Michael Tracy pointed out), the one person interviewed making millions was that (victim’s) lawyer whose name I forgot.

      Reply

    2. Conspiracy theories cut both ways. There is the basic common sense that Tracey’s mic could have been cut by someone involved in producing the show as a way to detract from his credibility. Not saying I know, just that it makes more sense than accusing him of pretending to not hear the question. Someone with Tracey’s intelligence and media experience would know that he couldn’t just pretend to not hear the question. That would only make him look bad.

      Reply

      1. Indeed I tend to think Tracey’s mic was cut off, because he sounded like he was in a mood to actually love the accusation of being a hired gun as it gave him an opportunity to expose the utter bad faith of his opponents.

        Reply

  70. A new Michael Tracey upload: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vSZSAoTDGI

    Mentions that the total sum of payments given to the “survivors” is now around a billion dollars.

    Whores who were mostly or all over 18 when they were willingly hired to give Epstein massages now only have to say they were “trafficked” and they get a couple of million from JP Morgen (probably more if they also claim they were “trafficked” before their 18th birthdays).

    And how disgusting is this – British satirical puppet show “Spitting Image” which was a popular on TV decades ago and is now a YouTube channel – ”
    The Andrew Arrest Special: The “Sure-To-Be-Shanked Redemption” Compilation | The Rest Is Bulls*!t”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgr0XZGoTiA

    This is a mainstream entertainment channel publicly calling for a member of the Royal Family to be stabbed to death in prison because he allegedly had sex with a 17 year old “trafficked” whore.

    2
    Reply

  71. FYI While CityCrusher is still being able to publish videos on Youtube, he is being affected by Youtube’s “hate speech/copyright” censorship. Some of his videos that I have posted here in the past are now private/hidden, and can’t be viewed.

    Just in case his channel gets deleted, he has a rumble channel.

    https://rumble.com/user/CityCrusher9308

    It looks like not all Youtube videos were uploaded to rumble.

    Reply

    1. @MH

      Great find and good article by Hanania. Finally, more and more of these articles pop up and people speaking out (not that it was his first one of this kind).

      @AF
      ” In the five-minute video, Smith informs his audience that it is bad enough when a 25-year-old man has sex with a 15-year-old woman, which should lead to prison.

      ->But he then says it is clearly much worse when a 55-year-old man has sex with an 18-year-old. One can maybe debate whether the age of consent should be say 18, 19, or 20. The normal male response is to want to KILL anyone who would engage in such “pedophilia,” and also just to be safe, kill anyone who would split hairs over the behavior of the offender. “<-

      https://theantifeminist.com/antifeminist-news-february-2026/#comment-646071

      "AF, you recently asked the question when will we reach the point where man get beaten to death when they admit being attracted to young women in their early 20s. I said this months before that we are already there, at the very least when it comes to insults, threats, and violent fantasies. The amount of hatred I read combined with wishing severe violence and agonizing death is appalling. This comment is just one of many other."

      Reply

  74. I need to harp on this information which Hanania has provied here once again.

    ”In the five-minute video, Smith informs his audience that it is bad enough when a 25-year-old man has sex with a 15-year-old woman, which should lead to prison.

    ->But he then says it is clearly much worse when a 55-year-old man has sex with an 18-year-old. One can maybe debate whether the age of consent should be say 18, 19, or 20. The normal male response is to want to KILL anyone who would engage in such “pedophilia,” and also just to be safe, kill anyone who would split hairs over the behavior of the offender. “<-

    The man Hanania is quoting from is the evolution of an ever increasing age-cuck madness created by feminists and their white knight lap dogs. Think about it. It has gotten so worse that these feminists with their male allies want to get you killed because of sex with an adult woman that otherwise could all she wants when she turns 18. She can do porn, have sex with hundreds of man their age, then it is fine even for tradcucks. But god forbid you are older. A penis is a penis, and penetration is penetration whether someone is 18 or 80. This man in particular is inciting other men to have murder fantasies against any man that dares to admit to liking young grown women that would be sexually active anyway. I made a comment in the past were I was "partially" hyperbolic that if the woman is at least 18 then it could result in death, but I also said that if given free reign it would definitely happen.

    Here is my quote from November,

    "Remember, when you watch that clip, if you happen to be above the age of let’s say 20, and feel even the slightest attraction at all, you are a dirty pedophile that deserves to be beaten to death by modern society’s standards."

    "…Basically, and this is my conviction, remove all humanity, decency, laws, it would end up like that."

    https://theantifeminist.com/november-news-2025/#comment-644781

    2
    Reply

    1. I haven’t read the article yet but will do so today and it sounds like he’s hit the nail on the head again.

      A bit off topic but it’s odd that Eivind and others will point to Michael Tracey as evidence that the left-wing is more open to rational discussion, but ignore that Hanania is “right-wing”. Shows how irrational Berge is.

      Reply

  75. And another case of younger people beating up older people, or in this case kicking down the stairs.

    https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/kriminalitaet/id_101143012/s-bahnhof-hermannstrasse-in-berlin-kind-stellt-sich-nach-brutaler-tat.html

    At least the article describes only one of them, the 12-year-old, as a child. The rest is labelled as adolescents.

    “Three films, a fourth kicks a man down the stairs at an S-Bahn station. Now it comes to light: The main suspect is a child.

    After the brutal attack on a 26-year-old at the Berlin S-Bahn station Hermannstraße, the sought-after youth group has come forward. As a spokesman for the Federal Police told t-online, the group consists of four children and adolescents aged twelve, 14, 14, and 15 years.”

    “Three teenagers are said to have pulled out their phones, apparently to film, according to the Federal Police. The 12-year-old then “deliberately jumped with his foot to the back” of the 26-year-old, causing him to fall down the stairs. The group fled afterward and was being searched for.”

    Reply

    1. Looks like he overstayed his visa and that’s why he got in trouble. What sucks is the Flips are running a US style old hag (child) protection campaign called shieldkids, which I’m sure is in response to Flips not giving a shit about the raise of the age of consent from 12 to 16.

      Reply

  78. I was in a Thalia bookstore in Vienna today. One display table was devoted to books on Islam (all positive). A table next to it was almost entirely feminist books together with books on (pro) Palestine.

    Reply

  79. China could have 25 – 35 million baby faced K-pop clones by 2050 through cosmetic surgery:

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2026/02/china-could-have-20-35-million-kpop-like-facial-surgery-copies-by-2030.html

    Cosmetic surgery and age reversal are the only hopes for real women to compete with sex robots and AI girlfriends.

    Sex robots and AI girlfriends will be hampered by “child porn” laws that mean they can’t look under 18.

    No such legislation for cosmetic surgery though, or any age rejuvenation therapies that appear.

    So even if just to compete with the sex robots and AI girlfriends in 2050, women will try to make themselves look 13 or 14 in order to have the one advantage that they can enjoy over them.

    1
    Reply

    1. Lol, now we know what stocks (shares) the AF holds. In spite of all the bad news, it’s good to sit down and see your money increase.

      Reply

      1. All my hope now is in 1/ an AI singularity which leads to a rational and benevolent AI government and 2/ being alive and rich when it happens.

        Reply

  82. I read the Richard Hanania essay today: https://www.richardhanania.com/p/why-low-human-capital-obsesses-over

    A lot of great points as usual, and good to see he referenced the murder of Alexander Cashford too.

    Paedohysteria is indeed at its most violent and obsessive in working-class men, but it’s middle-class women (feminists) who are the instigators. It’s ironic really that low-status plebs are acting as foot-soldiers to defend the sexual needs of middle-class hags.

    This part was very interesting, in which he explains how male plebs lift their status by simultaneously looking down on “paedophiles” and then projecting that “paedophiles” run society:

    ” I don’t simply hate pedophiles because they’re the only people I can look down on. In fact, quite the opposite. Pedophiles are running society! ”

    The other day I wrote in my diary – “the appeal of “1%” “elite” conspiracy theories is that it allows the mass to “follow the herd” whilst still believing that they are heretical and rebelling.”

    Not the same thoughts but there’s a kind of connection there I think.

    And I see Eivind the imbecile thinks Hanania has got it wrong about low-status males because Elon Musk is a big paedohysteric.

    First of all, Elon Musk is clearly an actual paedocrite. You just have to look at the examples of AI-generated female”beauty” that he constantly reposts (all teen like), the fact that he created a waifu AI companion that looks 13 or 14, the fact that he lied about not meeting Epstein and the like.

    Any idiot can see that the proles are absolutely obsessed with “nonces”. One “elite” guy who happens to have the biggest soapbox in the world doesn’t alter that.

    1
    Reply

      1. So, like in the case of Watkins, another “nonce” did the deed. And as I said, they are omitting it on purpose to push their agenda of “prison justice.” A “righteous” person avgenged these children, but wait, the man who did it raped and murdered women, too.

        Reply

      2. Well, he was much morally superior to him….
        I wouldn’t be surprised if demented mob was cheering on, if multiple murderer would kill some “downloader” (fortunately they are not serving in same “league”)…..I didn’t dare to open discussion at DM(as it would be vomit-inducing).

        I wonder to what extent (and how frequently) such cases are instigated by guards.

        Reply

        1. This is how the mass killing of “sex offenders” – the ‘Holocaust’ or ‘pedocide’ or whatever you want to call it – will start.

          Conditions in “sex offender’s wings” will gradually deteriorate, with prison staff increasingly turning a blind eye to beatings and even killings. Not only turning a blind eye to prison violence, but also the deliberate withholding of health care (this already happened to Max Clifford resulting in his death: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-50874060).

          Meanwhile, the number of sex offenders due to never ending feminist laws will continue to increase. They will start building special prisons just for sex offenders which will eventually turn into concentration camps.

          Reply

  84. Steve pointed out that Hanania uses the term “paedo hysteria” in the article. The great Chris Brand invented that term, as far as I know.

    Reply

  85. Hanania still having a hard time convincing his readers it appears, but there are some very good comments under the article. For example, this one:

    “Pedophilia is sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. If you talk about men who are not only pedophiles but actually commit sex crimes against pre-pubescent children, then yes obviously to a random guy on the street that is one of the worst crimes possible.

    However the argument here is that people misuse the term “pedophilia” and apply it to cases where we talk about ordinary heterosexuality, like having consensual sex with a 16 year old high school cheerleader. This would be legal almost everywhere given the fact that 16 is a legal age for sex almost everywhere.

    Actual pedophilia is insanely rare. You almost never hear of cases where men have sex with pre-pubescent children. And when that happens, its typically within the family, so we are talking about incest.

    So the argument is that this obsession with pedophilia has lead to the word loosing its meaning and now being applied to ordinary cases of heterosexuality where an older man has consensual sex with a biologically grown up woman who just happens to be under the age of 18.”

    1
    Reply

  86. I find it staggering that so few people over the last couple of decades have really attempted to analyse why the definition of paedophilia has been continually extended.

    I mean, obviously you often see people pointing out that it has been extended, and often they say it has been extended incorrectly (although these type of comments seem to get rarer and rarer).

    But you rarely see anybody actually explaining it as Hanania does, and of course, I have.

    “MAPs” themselves more or less embrace it (but absurdly try to substitute “MAP” for “paedophile”), and “ephebophiles” are the most likely to point out its unfair extension but don’t seem to have any idea why it’s happened, and their identification of “ephebophile”is merely a form of extending it anyway.

    2
    Reply

    1. Regarding the idea that paedohysteria if fuelled (at least partly) by low-status males, I remember making the point here that paedohysteria was worse in Western European countries because it’s a kind of deflection on the part of the white working classes who are being replaced by Muslim and African immigrants and are not allowed to even protest it. So they take their anger out on “nonces”.

      Countries like Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic are way more rational about “paedos” than Western countries and do not have the large-scale “pred hunter” vigilantes that the UK, Netherlands etc has. It’s only part of the reason though, as other factors such as less feminism and the fact that they have a lower age of consent of 14 or 15 are at least as important. Though we saw recently with Germany that despite an age of consent of 14 they still have the “teen predator” hunters.

      Reply

  87. Stephen Hawking’s family are having to defend him after the pictures of him with bikini women on Epstein’s island went viral.

    What a sick world we live in that a genius in a prison of a body may have been given some sexy fun thanks to Epstein, and his family have to defend it lest his reputation is totally destroyed by the mob.

    I wonder if they will cancel his physics. Maybe scrub all of his research from the Internet and take his books off the shelves?

    Reply

  88. Rupert Lowe, who has set up an even more right-wing party than Reform, and who is being backed by paedocrite Elon Musk, has gone further than Reform by promising to not only cage “child rapists” for life, but to execute them.

    According to Polymarket he is the most likely next Prime Minister.

    1
    Reply

  89. I saw Eivind’s comment about a Jennifer Plumb wanting to make care workers having sex with their geriatric patients illegal as a proof against STU theory.

    Again using an example of one individual as a proof against a global phenomena.

    He’s like his paedophile followers who point to Judith Levine as a “feminist” to prove that feminists are not our enemies.

    Not that I dispute that bitterness and plain “puritanism” is often the main motivation driving feminists. But wake me up when they are mobilizing en masse in every country in the world to criminalize “geriatric sex”, or for that matter, white women flocking to the caribbean to have sex with “big bamboos”, or homosexuality etc

    It’s easy to “hate sex” when you’re a washed up hag who knows she can’t get it anymore.

    In any case, the anti-sex framework that jealous, bitter feminists set up is in place now and needs to be constantly “reaffirmed”. Female teachers getting jailed for banging Tyrones, and now geriatric women prevented from having sex with a young carer because of “abuse of power” are just collateral from that.

    Here is the story: https://www.aol.com/articles/unlicensed-staff-having-consensual-sex-190112989.html

    1
    Reply

  91. “Michael Tracey Exposes Epstein Hysteria For What It Is”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLmzr9nsBOk

    It seems to me that we are in a very exclusive group of people who aren’t women or controlled by women, and as such, literally none of us even once fell for their Epstein pedohysteria since the beginning of it. We are the real arbiters of truth because the biggest hysteria in history couldn’t even touch us.

    I would just like to thank everyone here for your unique and rare abilities of wisdom and conviction that are demonstrably greater than the vast majority of the Western world’s population.

    Reply

  92. Whilst I can’t allow any comments here that might be interpreted as discussing how to escape feminist sex laws, lest I go to prison to be ass raped, the BBC laments this morning that the EU did not provide funding for women in countries were abortion is illegal (such as Malta) to travel to another EU country where it is legal.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgv92p6qzqo

    On the subject of feminist support for abortion, I wonder how the pedoberge types who believe that “feminists have just gone a bit too far” explain this?

    Since 1967 around 10 million abortions have taken place in the UK alone. The world is loosing its mind at a few teenage girls possibly having sexual contact with Epstein and his friends. If feminists just want to protect kids, why the hell do they support a holocaust of unborn kids being butchered every year?

    It’s nothing to do with protecting kids and everything to do with protecting their STU members’ sexual and “reproductive” needs.

    Nor does the STU care about things like bullying, which according to every indicator is something that impacts children’s lives far more than “pedos” and which children and teens themselves say is their biggest concern. They care about “domestic abuse” only as a way to demonize men and even there don’t give it nearly enough concern as “sexual abuse”.

    Reply

    1. So in short, if some female goes from one EU/EFTA country to other EU/EFTA country, to do thing that is illegal in her homeland, but legal in the other one:
      MY BODY MY CHOICE, I AM NOT PROPERTY OF MY COUNTRY!!!.
      But if some male would do the same, regarding paying a prostitute or finding younger GF where AOC is different in those countries, it is suddenly totally different situation .
      It begs some meme.

      Reply

      1. It even applies to looking at porn in private, that is legal where you have moved to or are travelling in, but illegal in your home country (at least for UK citizens). Yet women can be free and even encouraged to go to other countries where abortion is legal, even where late-term abortions are legal.

        Reply

        1. It even applies to looking at porn in private….
          It is as unenforceable as it is idiotic.
          It seems then,that extraterritoriality also applies to verbal crimes either
          (proposition of “big femihag bill” in UK which will effectively ban discussion of AOC/underage sexuality, came to my mind).
          It would be irony of fate if (at the end of the day) only country where it will be possible to freely discuss such issues will be USA.

          Reply

          1. I have no doubt that the reason the feminist establishment is so terrified of incels is not because of the occasional shootings and such, but 100% because of the age cuck meme. The leaked Department of Homeland Security report basically admitted such.

            Reply

    1. It’s another good incel thread.

      Hanania in his article gave a couple of reasons why paedohysteria harms society, and one of them was that it’s not good to extend adolescence and helplessness into the late teens and even twenties. I was a bit disappointed though that he didn’t mention more specifically generational apartheid.

      Also, the clueless MRAs don’t seem to realize that it’s particularly harmful to men as girls and young women have very little interaction with older men outside the family and fewer and fewer male teachers (itself caused by paedohysteria), and hence few positve examples of older men to counteract the feminist brainwashing and misandry.

      Reply

  95. The Fail loves old ladies in sexy outfits.

    I thought this clip was going to have some good thoughts about the Epstein saga, but after a minute or two, it was apparent that the narrator is just another believer and I stopped watching.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvPwEWxQ_kQ .

    I’ve linked to it in case people want to check it out. The whole look of the guy and what’s on his wall, the kind of studied casualness of it all, screams “try hard”.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *