Even American Conservatives Can Blame Women, But ‘We’ Can’t
White women are literally destroying civilization. Fertility rates are falling to the point where – without immigration – countries like Italy would be seeing their populations halve within a couple of generations. When white women do elect to breed and not abort their unborn child down the pan, it’s increasingly with representatives of imported low IQ groups, who do nethertheless make their ‘ginas tingle with their thuggish ways and their huge cocks. Probably in part because of their attraction to Third World thugs and their dicks, young white women are voting for ‘liberal’, pro-immigration parties in ever greater numbers, whilst young men are turning increasingly conservative, rightfully objecting to being replaced and erased from history.
And, of course, women are doing this whilst calling for the locking up of increasing numbers of men under their never ending sex laws, the majority of them white men who are, or who have been productive members of society.
Now even the traditionally white knighting US Right have had close to enough of women, and are increasingly calling out the elephant in the room. White women are literally destroying Western Civilization, and it will likely happen within two centuries of gaining the vote (and you could argue that Western Civilization is already beyond saving).
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 9, 2025
If only the ‘MAPs’ and those seeking to stop or even turn back the onslaught of anti-sex laws aimed at men, could somehow see and call out the elephant in the room – that women are responsible for their plight. But it’s likely impossible. Whilst women are 95% responsible for anti-male sex laws, that result in tens of thousands of sex offenders that are 99% male, the sad fact is that 99% of MAPs are autistic white knighting imbeciles who can never see what’s in front of their own faces. It would be a miracle if they could even be persuaded to blame feminists.
Are we back?
YES!
What’s your thoughts on female teacher getting arrested for having a sexual relationship with a teenage boy ?
What do I think about 1 in 100 sex offenders who fall foul of feminist anti-sex laws being women? Should women get the pussy pass for having sex with 13 year old black studs in class whilst they force the white incels to stand guard at the doors?
I think Eivind is literally the biggest cuck in the universe for his obsession with giving them the pussy pass.
What do you think about Eivind white knighting for a female sex offender who had previously stated many times on social media her wish for all ‘paedophiles’ to be tortured slowly to death?
Wished female sex offender said that ?
You think he’s wrong for sharing articles about female teachers for having a consensual relationship with the student or been accused ?
Would it be wrong for the leader of Hamas to spend 80% of his time in supporting the right of Jews to have beach front mansions in Gaza?
What does this have to do with my question ?
I have some disagreements with Eivind Berge but he’s not wrong about the whole female sex offender charade even though I I’m against a female saying paedophiles should be tortured
I honestly think Eivind’s blog is a better fit for you Swoll. This will be the last comment of yours I reply to unless you offer an actual insight or argument, rather than just your own basic agreement or disagreement. So as far as female sex offenders are concerned I’ll try to answer very simply and directly. TBH, I’m not on welfare like Eivind – I have to work for a living and don’t have time.
1/ Women are responsible for all of these anti-sex laws. They are lobbied for by NGOs and individuals that are 90% composed of women. Women overwhelmingly support these laws, to a significantly greater degree than men, who are only following their own white knight herd instinct in going along with women anyway.
2/ Therefore I don’t particularly care about the 1 in a hundred sex offenders that are women and think it’s unbelievably undignified and cucked to do so. It’s like Jews in Nazi Germany caring more about German civilians being bombed than 6 million Jews in death camps.
3/ Having said that, the MRAs equal obsession with female sex offenders in the opposite direction is almost as misguided, as it validates feminist anti-sex laws that target men and victimize men, and creates a false picture that women are ‘equally the victims’ of feminist sex laws. In other words, it creates equality of injustice for all.
*The ‘incels forced to guard the doors’ comes from the most famous female sex offender a few years ago (can’t remember her name). She was convicted in the USA for giving a 13 year old student a blowjob in class whilst other boys were asked to stand guard at the door. Eivind posted a dozen articles crying about her. 4Chan doxxed the boy and revealed that he was 13 year old Afro-American football playing Chad who looked about 18.
Regarding the female sex offender who wished for (male) paedophiles to be tortured to death, you’ll have to look through Eivind’s comments yourself.
Jack might have posted the link to this study before, but I’ll do it here again:
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-70022-003
“Four theories about cultural suppression of female sexuality are evaluated. Data are reviewed on cross-cultural differences in power and sex ratios, reactions to the sexual revolution, direct restraining influences on adolescent and adult female sexuality, double standard patterns of sexual morality, female genital surgery, legal and religious restrictions on sex, prostitution and pornography, and sexual deception. The view that men suppress female sexuality received hardly any support and is flatly contradicted by some findings. Instead, the evidence favors the view that women have worked to stifle each other’s sexuality because sex is a limited resource that women use to negotiate with men, and scarcity gives women an advantage.”
The one I posted was the following, equally interesting:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11127197_Loose_Women_or_Lost_Women_The_Re-emergence_of_the_Myth_of_White_Slavery_in_Contemporary_Discourses_of_Trafficking_in_Women
“This article compares current concerns about “trafficking in women” with turn of the century discourses about “white slavery”. It traces the emergence of narratives on “white slavery” and their reemergence in the moral panics and boundary crises of contemporary discourses on “trafficking in women”. Drawing on historical analysis and contemporary representations of sex worker migration, the paper argues that the narratives of innocent, virginal victims purveyed in the “trafficking in women” discourse are a modern version of the myth of “white slavery”. These narratives, the article argues, reflect persisting anxieties about female sexuality and women’s autonomy. Racialized representations of the migrant “Other” as helpless, child-like, victims strips sex workers of their agency. This article argues that while the myth of “trafficking in women”/”white slavery” is ostensibly about protecting women, the underlying moral concern is with the control of “loose women”. Through the denial of migrant sex workers’ agency, these discourses serve to reinforce notions of female dependence and purity that serve to further marginalize sex workers and undermine their human rights.”
Thanks Jack – yes, that’s very interesting too. I’m going to make a post or page consisting of links to these studies and their summaries, and we can add any others that appear or that we find. I’ll try to do it today.
Leftist young woman rants that men who disagree with her politics are ‘undateable’.
https://x.com/BrianAtlas/status/1985000696689598946
After the election of the Muslim guy in New York, the stark contrast in voting between young women and white men is a focal point of discussion again, above all among the right.
We’re likely to be entering the ‘age of civil wars’ over the next few decades. The winners will be either very right-wing white supremacists or Muslim dominated movements.
The good news is that women’s voting rights and influence are likely to be severely restricted by whichever side that wins.
Women are such natural liars, it is astounding. Muslims are right that a woman must have four witnesses to report a serious crime. Unfortunately, Muslims also have Bacha Bazi, but positively, they also have “temporary child marriage,” so it’s a mixed bag. Iran seems to have the best version of Islam for men, which explains why it is demonized by the West.
The woman in the video says she doesn’t date bigoted men who have no respect for minorities and women, while she 100% guaranteed has sex with those men because she finds them attractive (as long as they are high status). She herself is bigoted and has no respect for minorities and women, by the way. When those men don’t commit to her for obvious reasons, she takes out her anger on unattractive men who respect minorities and women by supporting misandrist policies and demanding more for sex with them (the STU). It’s the technologically-driven amplification of the same behavior we’ve seen for decades from enfranchised women. It is important to remember most women have rape fantasies, just like all men love a great pair of tits. Women’s rape fantasies are not based on “men who respect women” just as men’s love of great tits are not based on 400 pound landwhales.
Maybe the coming disruption will force the governments to put more resources into that war as opposed to supporting international feminism. It’s not unreasonable to see a tipping point forming here, hopefully it appears while we can still enjoy hot teens!
Andrew Tate telling it like it is again too. MAPs and Berges could learn something here:
It’s a curious thing that MRAs can see that feminists (and women) are responsible, even that it’s a feminist ‘pussy cartel’ responsible, for anti-prostitution laws, sex trafficking laws, anti-porn laws. But of course, sadly, they refuse to admit the age of consent as a valid issue.
Maps and Eivind/Amos Yee type paedophiles can, of course, see that the age of consent is a valid ‘rights’ issue (leaving aside the virtuous MAPS), but bizarrely refuse to see feminists as responsible and certainly are constitutionally incapable of blaming women.
This is one of the reasons why I say that incels are the great hope. They are the only community to demonstrate (even if its arguably not the majority incel view) that it is possible for men to see that the age of consent is a rights issue AND to blame women.
The white knighting instinct CAN be overcome when it comes to fighting against paedohysteria and the high age of consent. The incels prove it.
And that gives me hope that what I am doing here is not completely in vain and futile.
(Note also that incels also can blame and hate ‘men’ in the form of Chads or just ‘normies’, but they don’t lose sight of the fact that the principle source of their misery are women).
Another interesting case is gays. Back in the 50’s and 60’s when homosexuality was still being legalized and even then very much still frowned upon, the gay community was very anti-women.
They used to call women – breeders.
They blamed women for their plight, to a very large extent.
Then, of course, feminists co-opted the gay community in order to put a stop to their millenia long love for young boys (whilst presenting a face of ‘liberal sexual progressiveness’).
The gay community literally sold their souls to the devil.