Feminists claim ‘femicide’ to stir misandry, whilst denying ‘Francocide’

Feminists exploit rape and murder of white French woman in Paris to futher misandry, while at the same time warning ‘the right’ not to exploit it to further racism.

After the shocking rape and murder of a young student in Paris, by a Moroccan migrant who was due to be deported, a French feminist has described it as another ‘femicide’ – the ridiculous idea that men are conducting a war of extermination against women by murder. Feminists define pretty much any murder of a female by a man, unless perhaps the motivation was robbery, as ‘gender motivated femicide’. Despite this absurd criteria, the number of ‘femicides’ in France in 2022 was only 147, out of a female population of around 34 million, and around 1,000 murders in total, the vast majority of the victims being men at the hands of other men.

Although statistics on race would not be available in France, a disproportionate number of murders are committed in France by African born or descent individuals against native white people. The ‘right-wing‘ in France use the hashtag #Francocide to highlight this whenever a new case appears, as it regularly does.

But while feminists are allowed to describe any murder of a woman by a man as ‘femicide’, white people are not allowed to describe murders of white people by foreigners as ‘Francocide’. Even in this shocking case, where a failed asylum seeker, who should already have been deported under a court order that had been issued, raped and murdered a white French girl.

As a French feminist makes clear :

Sandrine Rousseau of the Ecologists said the murder was a “femicide” which should be “punished severely”. But she warned that the far right would “exploit it to spread its racist and xenophobic hate”.

According to her Wikipedia entry :

Sandrine Rousseau is a French economist and politician who has represented the 9th constituency of Paris in the National Assembly since 2022. Member of Europe Ecology – The Greens (EELV), she has been widely seen as a figurehead of France’s MeToo movement against sexual violence, and describes herself as an ecofeminist.

Despite making it their life’s work to combat ‘gender violence’, including ‘femicide’, and lobbying for and introducing ever more laws and punishments (against men) in order to achieve that, such left-wing feminists are only too happy to embrace migrants, and even call for open-borders, in the knowledge that this will result in more women and girls being assaulted, raped, and even murdered.

In fact, they will publish ‘studies‘ that ‘show’ that climate change will increase domestic and sexual abuse on women, yet will not acknowledge the obvious fact that unchecked migration will do so.

Again, Sexual Trade Union theory, or ‘the Green Pill’, explains this apparent feminist madness. Feminists do not give a rat’s arse about women or girls being raped or murdered by migrants. What they care about is limiting the sexual freedom of men in general, in order to shore up their own abysmal sexual value, as well as simply providing an outlet for their sexual bitterness and resentment towards the male sex which rejects them.

As I have argued here many times over the last two decades :

Feminists support unchecked Third World immigration into the West, because they understand that it will increase sexual assaults on women and girls, including rapes and murders, and that they will be able to exploit the anger over this in order to successfully lobby for new anti-sex laws and harsher punishments, that will increase their own sexual market value.

A clear example of this was only a couple of years ago, when France defnitively set their age of consent at 15, and legally defined any sex with a child below that age as ‘rape’. This was in response to anger over two French men of African extraction walking free from court after having sex with a young girl below 15.

If the right-wing ‘exploit’ cases of migrants and foreigners raping young Frenchwomen, then feminists exploit that exploitation for their own Sexual Trade Union ends, whilst simultaneously virtue signalling their pretend abhorrence.