Some genius at Reddit Men’s Rights has created several rather splendid replies to the latest nauseating set of ‘Men Can Stop Rape’ posters.
Here’s the original posters :
And here are his replies :
Some genius at Reddit Men’s Rights has created several rather splendid replies to the latest nauseating set of ‘Men Can Stop Rape’ posters.
Here’s the original posters :
And here are his replies :
Sorry for this but –
I just imagined a poster featuring a farmer with a sheep under the caption “When Baaaarbra isn’t in the mood, I fuck my ugly wife instead”.
Oh wow, I laughed so much!
Haha Deano – I loved your Christmas joke about Jesus and prostitutes as well. Maybe we could start up a line of anti-feminist greetings cards or something?
The response posters were rather weak and the first two didn’t even make sense. The third one asks men to go against their instinct and treat male dv victims with sympathy. The problem is we are naturally repulsed by weak men being abused, but protective/sympathetic of weak women being abused. Trying to change Man’s nature is a losing battle. Response to feminazi propoganda is only effective when it uses Man’s nature to its advantage the way Manhood Academy’s emasculation parts 1 and 2 youtube series does.
Response poster 1: Most women can’t rape men through sheer strength alone. Most of the time they rape young boys (where strength is not an issue) or they drug adult men. A more effective poster would have provactively stated “Women who molest children are 3X more likely to molest boys over girls”
Response poster 2: This poster would be actually make sense if it depicted the single mother as out of control, entitled brat who’s too incompetent and self-interested to put the child’s interests above her own. A better headline would say “75% of violent felons in prison were raised by a single mother” or “Single mothers destroy societies”
All 3 reply posters made reasonable sense to me.
All that is required is a female that you don’t want to have sex with period, or at least for the time being (in contrast to another woman you want to have sex with) to come on to you, rub & grind against/embrace you in various states of undress (such as your wife’s less attractive sister)… get you semi-erect (natural respose against your will) and grab it and guide it in her hole.
You will be captive and be unable to get away while being half crazed with physical lust that must be relieved by orgasm to prevent the Madness.
Just like a heterosexual man sticking his organ thru a Glory Hole drilled in the wall, and not knowing (against his will) if there is woman, child, man, beast, or succubus on the other side of the wall…. it can’t be helped… the man is a victim.
We don’t call women who are dragged into an alley & begin to moan & lubricate, or as in the film Gladiator when the wife was ravished over and over again by the Roman soldiers and “moaned like a whore” as not being a victim of “Rape” because she wound up herself getting horny humping a little or moaning.
The last reply poster was very reasonable – being with a crazy harpy, bipolar, PMS etc. (Lesbians – that is females bud, have by far the highest rates of Domestic Violence… self-priveledged entitled without consequenses cat fight rage.) puts a male in a very dangerous position of an all of the sudden suprise attack laskh out with a dangerous weapon to inflict bodily harm, incontrast to the bit over the top corporeal punishment of common male initiated Domestic Violence.
As far as the second reply pic, of course women hurt children with physical pain & cruelty at a rate higher than men.. the mentality of feminist women from abortion on is that “their incubated property” is living on the adge anyways as it might have been disposed of at anytime as she saw fit at a whim, thus crippling nurturing at a subconscious level.
Groggy laying on my back with the typos here..
Should add that back in the 1940s & 1950s before 3rd wave feministas infected widespread, the police did not recognize the “crime” of date rape… If an unmarried or engaged woman called upon a man in the late evening (near bedtime) at his residence after an evening out – she was asking for it, as no “chaste-repectable” woman would be in the presence of a normally horny male. “It can’t be helped”.
As feminist Camille Paglia said, “Much of what is termed Rape nowadays used to be called “Unbridled Love” (lovingly “having your way”). Making a mountain out of a mole hill…. er
“Now we will stop & change positions… What!! you’re still humping me in that position? RAPE!!!!”
Feminazi group Equality Now’s mantra “women should not have to resist rape to be able to call it rape”.
I suppose as a thought they could just run away like the man could run away.
Andrew I driven to respond to your comments. I am a very strong opponent of female chauvinism (Feminism). I have bogs in other parts of this site and other sites.
I have raised seven children, two of whom were girls. One night one of them when 19 went for coffee with a group of fellow students whom she had known for several months. Her car had broken down so one of her male student friends offered to give her a lift home to her apartment. On the way they talked and during the conversation she indicated her computer had started to play up. The guy volunteered to have a quick look at it for her. As she opened her apartment door he king punched her in the back of the head immediately rendering her unconscious. He then dragged her down the hall of her apartment and into the bedroom. He then viciously had his way with her while she was unconscious. My daughter didn’t resist so was it rape?
LOL when I see my typo of “bogs” instead of blogs. Yes at my age I still can see the humor in fart jokes, penis jokes, and jokes about male bodies when males make it of each other.
Older Guy, that’s a truly heartbreaking story. I hope they caught him and locked him up for at least long enough to enable him to inherit your nickname (here) when (or hopefully IF), he is eventually released.
Of course the female chauvinists would never even think (thus care at all), that men also have to cope with these sorts of experiences and probably suffer in a worse way than any of them could ever imagine…
Oh they do. They perceive that men see daughters as an extension of male property. They propose men see rape as men sexually interfering with another man’s property. There is no consideration of male empathy for their child, male morality, or actual male social justice. We have to keep in mind the female chauvinists have advocated men have limited morals and women are superior morally. A basic inference from “Damned Whores and Gods Police” which is considered as the text book for up and coming female chauvinists. It proposes women have a history of keeping men on the straight and narrow as men can not do it themselves. This book alone has generated over $2Million in sales. The concealed commercialisation of female chauvinism through academic publications is another item for discussion. Another element of the agenda people have not given thought to yet.
Glen.
http://mrafront.blogspot.com/2012/01/women-can-stop.html
I agree with Tremble: it’s better to follow the pathway of nature and to avoid giving the impression that we share the feminist notion that our mind is a tabula rasa that can be overhauled according to our taste.
In my opinion, the MRA should focus on shaming women’s attraction for thugs, bad boys and psychopaths.
I always tell women who complain about abusive men: your choices reflect who you are and what qualities you value. If you value potential for aggression in a mate, then don’t complain if your man once use this violence against you, while you would prefer him to be violent against other men exclusively.
Well I agree Nico, although I think at least the first two posters make perfect sense.
With regard to your suggestion about staying true to nature, I think the second poster (the child abuse one) does that rather well, unlike Tremble’s suggestion (which, like most MRAs, seeks to pretend that women are attracted to youth in the same way that men are). I’ve always said that the best way to respond to the feminist fixation over ‘child molestors’ is to highight the fact that women are more likely to physically abuse children. Not to simply (and vainly) try to show that women break feminist statutory rape laws as much as men do.
I think the first poster (the women rape one) makes complete sense to me. It doesn’t imply that women user brute force to rape men, but women are experts in getting sex from a partner through manipulation (you don’t love me anymore etc etc – you must be seeing another women etc etc).
What a bunch of fucking bullshit posters.
The kind of people that would pay attention to them are just idiots.
Anon:
I’m always amazed at the flawless logic, intelligently-crafted arguments, and beautiful prose that all you pro-feminists use to counter our arguments.
I’m sure the debates in most Womyn’s Studies courses sound about as in-depth.
Eric,
I read that comment too, but I must be looking from a different perspective to you, where I thought he was mocking the (original) posters that these modified ones (above) are used as replies, or should even replace…
Hmmmm…now that you mention it, it’s not clear what he’s referring to. I thought by ‘posters’ he was referring to people who post comments.