Wolf-whistling and ‘sexist remarks’ could soon be illegal throughout the EU under the latest anti-male European convention – signed on International Women’s Day.
In a special event to mark International Women’s Day, David Cameron will pledge to fight verbal and non-verbal violence against women, including sexual harassment.
By signing the Council of Europe convention, he will vow to take “necessary legislative measures” against anyone breaking the clauses within, by committing “verbal, non-verbal or physical” sexual harassment.
This is thought to include sexist comments and street harassment, including shouting or whistling at women in public.
In particular, the convention sets out a definition of sexual harassment, as “violating the dignity of a person, in particular when creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.”
This, it says, is “subject to criminal or other legal sanction”.
This is how politics works in the eUSSR. One day, we wake up, and without discussion or debate, our leaders announce the most absurd laws that, actually or potentially, criminalise the entire male population of Europe. Another new and vaguely worded EU convention has been signed into law.
Can you imagine, for example, how Rebecca Watson’s Elevatorgate incident might potentially be covered under these new laws? In future, when you approach a woman in Europe and ask her for a coffee, if she happens to think you’re a beta male piece of disposable shit that is beneath her, then she could have you arrested for invading her dignity and creating an ‘intimidating environment’. In future, if you stop and turn your head at the slut with the see-through leggings and her boobs hanging out, it might not be enough for her to look back at you like you’re a perverted piece of filth – she could have you caged as a sex offender.
And even if the odd European country were to be brave enough to refuse to sign up to such stupidity – which never happens these days – there would still be no escape. The state now owns you, and it doesn’t matter where you commit these ‘crimes’. It was also announced today that British men who commit any ‘abuse’ against women in another EU state, can be arrested and tried in the UK if it is not possible in the country where it took place (i.e. it’s not illegal there). This ‘when in Rome, don’t do as the Romans do or you’ll end up in a British jail back home’ rule had already been introduced by the previous British government for cases of ‘paedophilia’. So, for example, even though the age of consent is 13 in Spain, you could still go to jail in the UK if you were spotted by a holidaying British police officer kissing a 15 year old senorita on the lips.
Those who rape or “seriously harm” women will be prosecuted in this country if charges are not brought abroad under the “unprecedented” agreement.
The new procedures would also cover offences such as forced marriage, female genital mutilation, and forced abortions which may not be illegal abroad.
Last night, Mr Cameron also said that stalking would be made a criminal offence. “Stalking is an abhorrent crime,” the Prime Minister said. “It makes life a living hell for victims. That is why we are explicitly criminalising stalking to make sure that justice is done.”
Currently, only murder and paedophile offences committed abroad can be prosecuted in British courts. In a joint statement to mark International Women’s Day, the Prime Minister and his deputy said they were acting to tackle the “utter scandal” of violence and domestic abuse suffered by millions of women.
One of the great Scottish philosopher David Hume’s central arguments against political anarchy was that, if you didn’t like the laws of your own country, you could simply go and bugger off somewhere with rules more to your taste. Unfortunately, in the civilised Britain of the 18th century, it must have been impossible for Hume to imagine that 300 years later, every man would have become the mere possession of the Big Sister fascist state to which he happened to be born.
Oh well, they’ll just keep oppressing us further, exploiting us more, raping our dignities and continue stripping away our human rights little-by-little, bit-by-bit, because we just sit there like stunned mullets and let them do it…
How much longer are we going to allow this abhorrent crime against humanity continue unopposed?
Until now: millions and millions of COURAGEOUS MEN have fought in the most violent and bloody wars and millions fought literally to their deaths, in such wars to defend their countries against the most violent and heartless foes; yet here we are in 2012 too SCARED to even speak out against a small group of psychotic, derranged lesbians???
What is wrong with US?
Men need to wake up to the FACT that these lesbian whores and their gutless mangina puppets are a far more ruthless enemy than any communist or other facist regimes that have attempted to invade nations or other civilizations over past history!
It is inconceivable really how we are just standing by and wtaching this ruthless enemy as it totally annihilates what was once a perfectly functional and morally healthy society, without as much as lifing a finger, in an effort to defend it…
Mind boggling…
You call yourself oppressed because you cannot cat call women ( sexually harass us?!) You are a poor excuse for a man let alone a human being! This entire website is full of sh*t. Feminists want equality with men and nothing more. You are all a bunch of whiny bitches! Walk in a woman’s high heels for once and then you tell me who has it harder in this life. Read the papers-women get murdered and raped by their so called lovers every damn day. Were not the ones killing you-you are killing us. You all need your smelly dicks chopped off-maybe that will keep your perverted “sexuality” in line!!
*Note : I get comments like this from feminists – making explicit criminal threats of violence – nearly every day. I just chose to relax my usual moderation policy and approve this one because I thought it might be illuminating in the light of the recent SPLC’s declaration that men’s rights sites are ‘hate groups’.
To the average feminist, men ought to be physically mutilated and tortured simply for raising criticisms of their laws that (by their own admission) target and criminalise men (in this case, probably mostly or universally black and lower working class white men). Although they won’t get their wish in the immediate future, it does seem an increasing possibility (thanks to money spinning corrupt civil rights groups in the pocket of the feminist industry) that questioning feminist laws, as we do on this site, will soon become illegal.
This persons ip address is : 66.166.99.44, with the e-mail address : lakitu2@hotmail.com
Thank you jennie I now rest my case. That you are the most VIOLENT and hateful organization in the world today…
Q: How do you celebrate International Vagina Day?
A: You pass more anti-male laws.
The West is as good as dead.
and in what way exactly will this be different from Sharia law and the Mutaween religious police in Saudi Arabia, where you can get locked up precisely for whistling after a woman, or giving her a tongue-in-cheek compliment not deemed suitable by the religious moralist fanatics in power?
It’s a no-brainer that sexism isn’t a good thing… that isn’t the point here… but when casual sexual comments can soon be willfully misconstrued as sexual harrassment, then really in what way is the West still different from the autocratic regimes of the Middle East?
It’s not enough that those old ugly feminist hags have through their punitive laws started effectively throwing burquas on any young nubile woman who may or may not be under 18, now they’re going after men who have the audacity to pursue attractive youthful women in everyday life.
Well, dear middle-aged dried-up feminazis, it doesn’t matter how illegal you make it for us men to act on our natural urges and pursue and court young women at the peak of their phsyical attractiveness… and it doesn’t matter how many men you turn into manginas and white knights and have them hand their testicles over to you – at the end of the day, the average man, whose attention you are so desperate for deep down inside (deny it as you may) will still never again have any sexual interest in you.
By the way, is there anything in those new government plans regarding soliciting prostitutes abroad? Norway has already gone down that road, not only is prostitution in Norway illegal, but any man with a Norwegian passport is forbidden from paying for sex anywhere on this planet… no matter how legal and consensual…
Insane.
If sexual harassment is defined as “violating the dignity of a person, in particular when creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.” then most American Universities would be found guilty because of the anti male environment existing throughout American education. I find it hard to believe that Britian is much different.
Has anyone given thought to using these laws against feminist since by definintion feminism violates these laws on a wide scale.
“If sexual harassment is defined as “violating the dignity of a person, in particular when creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.”
..or how about the environment men have to live and breathe 24 hours a day, where being caught looking at a beautiful girl in her late teens or even early twenties – instead of a middle-aged hag – is enough to leave you in fear of being branded a sub-human paedophile, at risk of being either lynched or arrested? Or where a man faces jail simply for ‘cheating’ on his wife by paying for anonymous sex with a foreign hooker, based on clearly exaggerated myths and lies surrounding ‘sex trafficking’?
Whether or not sexually self-interested laws made by middle-aged bags constitutes actual rape, they certainly fall under this new legal definition of ‘sexual harassment’. The aim now should be to create a well-funded men’s rights movement that sticks up for male sexuality, and that can bring legal charges against the worst feminist rapists and criminals.
It’s a great idea in principle, however in practice we’d probably find they have already thought of that possible ‘leak’ in the new legislation and have it well and truly sealed up with some nonsensicle sub-pargraph or clause that essentially spells out that women are exempt, because the legislation was introduced to protect women (not men) from sexual harrassment and other offences comitted against women by men.
This remark alone is testimony that the primary purpose of this misandrous new legislation is to further criminalize MEN ONLY:
In a joint statement to mark International Women’s Day, the Prime Minister and his deputy said they were acting to tackle the “utter scandal” of violence and domestic abuse suffered by millions of women.
Years ago we could have taken this proposed new law to the UN and they would probably have deemed it misandrous or at least sexually biased or something and they would have disallowed it under humanitarian grounds.
However, as you’re aware, it’s all different now: the (feminist ruled) UN quite possibly even wrote the draft for it!
It looks like the only way we’re ever going to beat this is by a a traditional type of lawless revolt!
You’re probably right Alan…
and it’s not just the United Nations that have been hijacked by the sexual trade union, it’s nearly all ‘human rights’ organisations as well. You might have already seen that the men’s rights movement have officially been listed as a ‘hate group’ by an influential ‘civil rights’ organsiation : http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/an-open-letter-to-richard-cohen-of-the-splc/
No, I hadn’t seen it until now – looks like it was only posted today… I wonder though (and doubt too) if Paul’s letter will have any effect or even be taken seriously.
If we tried to do the same it would only perpetuate their myth that we are a misogynist bunch of losers and would possibly be regarded as PROOF of that myth!
The problem is, we have allowed it to go too far now – we have effectively allowed them to push us into a corner that we cannot move out from, using acceptable, legal processes anymore.
While I do not advocate anything illegal and favour anything involving violence even less, it is beginning to look like we will eventually be forced into something like that. If we don’t do something soon, the future of our society or even the entire human race is doomed.
The biggest hurdle we have is to get the message (THE REALITY) out to all men. I believe that most men are not aware of what’s going on, nor of the magnitude of the situation and its frightening progressiveness.
Most men I speak to about feminism appear to regard feminism as an almost absurd, to harmless belief by a few twisted ‘space-cadet’ class of middle aged lonely housewives!!
They are fully aware of the family court scandal, but even in that area, they don’t seem to realize that those ridiculous laws are all the result of feminist ideologies and unabating misandry…
Needless to say, they also fully agree and subscribe to the frenzied anti-paedophile mantra and associated paedo-hysterical thought crime laws; not knowing how easily they could temselves become victims of the laws, (that they believe protect children from perverts and sexual predators)!
Once at least 80% of men are fully aware of what is unfolding ‘right under their noses’, we may be able to do something.
Presently, I would be surprised if anymore than 8% of men are aware, because the feminazis, have successfully BRAIN WASHED them (in the same clever way they did the white-knights in governments) with paedo-hysteria white-wash!
I wonder if holidaying Brits driving in say France or Germany would be charged with driving on the wrong side of the road upon returning to the UK? Same logic. British holiday makers should drive by UK rules when on the continent. Yes, quite sensible. “Next problem please”.
The issue of why these laws seem to be accepted by so many men with nary a squeak of protest bugs me also. But I think the problem revolves around the apparent guilt visited upon anyone who questions such laws. “Surely, only a pedophile would find these laws unacceptable?” is the conditioned response. I have heard the occasional talk-back caller ring in and try to raise this issue from a balanced, rational viewpoint only to hear the host cut him off while assuring his listeners that perverts don’t deserve to air their disgusting philosophies in public. They proceed to invite callers to ring in and voice “any opinion they want”.
Politicians shit their pants at the thought of having anyone accuse them of sympathizing with sicko peddos and could not bring themselves to be seen questioning any aspect of these laws. They only follow what they think will generate votes. They’ll be the last ones to change their ‘opinions’.
I sometimes wonder if the only practical approach to this is simply to beat the feminists at their own game and actually push for utterly ridiculous laws to shine a light on just how outrageous the existing laws already are. I feel like contacting organisations such as media outlets who promote the ‘all men are guilty anyway’ line, and request them to do their bit to fight paedophillia by this simple excercise: Each week, all staff members have to submit an essay expressing how disgusted they are that some 19 year old men might find 17 year old girls attractive. The author of the least convincing essay is sacked since they are obviously a sicko baby rapist. The following week, fresh essays are submitted. Another example of pure scum filth is identified and dismissed. If they refuse to implement my child protection plan, then they MUST ALL BE PEDDOS!!!
Deano, you should contest Julia Gillard at the next poll. That is a bloody brilliant idea!
“Deano, you should contest Julia Gillard at the next poll.”
She’s already doing a great job of defeating herself – anyway, they’ll probably make failing to vote for female candidates an offense by then.
Interesting that British men who commit ‘forced abortions’ in another EU state, will be charged in the UK, even if what they did wasn’t illegal in the European country in which they did it.
Yet feminists in Poland are able to freely advertise abortion services in the UK, and encourage Polish women who want an abortion to travel to the Uk to make use of them, even though abortion is illegal (child murder) in Poland.
http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/15573946
Note also that the ‘paedophilia abroad’ rule is one that the EU itself introduced at the behest of feminist fake child protection groups. So, for example, it is similarly illegal (as far as I know) for a Polish man (the age of consent is 15 in Poland) to have sex with a 14 year old in Italy (where the age of consent is 14).
Whilst on the topic of righteous and self-appointed morality enforcers in the media, your story above brings back to mind one very prominent media morality judge, who seemed totally obsessed with the paedo witch-hunt, to the degree that he even ended up serving time in prison over it.
I have always thought that he was a classic example of the paedocrite we discussed a couple of days ago…
He seems to have disappeared, haven’t seen his ugly, hairy face for at least 12 years now…
The last stint he did in prison was after he publicly named and shamed this Catholic priest who hadn’t even been charged by the police for anything, after the alleged victim’s mother contacted him via his mail address that he always displayed at the end of his 30 minute TV show, screened every week-night on Channel 7. The alleged paedo priest was inevitably investigated following his very public allegations, by the police, but after intense investigation was cleared of any wrong-doing…
I think you probably know who I am talking about now…
Has anyone (apart from me) ever looked into his personal life (when he wasn’t on TV crying: “It’s SHAMEFUL, Its an outrage, it’s disgusting blah,blah, blah”)…
The man as far as I know has lived alone most of his life, no girlfriend, grows a beard to hide his face, due to his poor self-image… And is OBSESSED with naming, shaming and persecuting others. WHY?
Get my drift?
Yes – I know exactly of whom you speak. I always felt there was something odd about his constant need to be seen as a crusader against child abuse. Yet he only ever seemed interested in the big sensational stories where he could “name high profile people in the halls of power” etc. The vast majority of little kids being beaten, starved, left on the streets etc were of no concern to this self promoting big mouth.
Great article in the Daily Mail – but the femiservative and mangina readers don’t like it, judging from the comments sections.
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/debate/article-2112142/International-Womens-Day-Plans-ban-wolf-whistling-men-saying-darling.html
@theantifeminist
In reference to the hatred and violence inciting post left by ‘jennie’ earlier today, I thought this interesting website quite appropriate:
http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
I also wonder (however, not only doubt but know they won’t) include in these new legislative measures that will apply across all EU states, will criminalize those women SCAM artists (mainly from Eastern European and former Soviet Union countries) that ‘seduce’ unsuspecting lonely men, usually via online ‘singles’ sites or even the more conventional overseas singles or introduction agencies, then within a few months or even weeks, after gaining legal residential status in the man’s home country as his legal spouse, take EVERYTHING the man owns, using the DV ‘exploit’?
We recently had a spate of these elaborate, but totally life destroying scams here in Australia, where lonely men (a couple of them weren’t that old either), found the women of their dreams (Russian,Ukrainian, Lithuanian or Romainian and others) via an online singles site or a local (Australian based) introduction agency and began corresponding with them. Then, to cut a long story short: they eventually married the girl, applied for a partner migration visa, then they both moved to live together in the man’s home. Then usually within months or weeks after arrival, the man would come home from work or wherever, to find he could not unlock his doors. Becuase his beautiful princess of a wife had changed all of the locks… Changed all of the external door’s locks, following advice from the local police, whom she’d just lodged a complaint against her husband for Domestic Violence.
Of course needless to say, in Australia, like everywhere else in the West, DV can mean that he raised his voice at her or any one of hundreds of things other than actual physical assault or violence, thus no proof or witnesses required – her word is good enough to serve the man with what they term here: an ‘Apprehending Viloence Order’ (the most abused, misused, yet most popular legal document in Australia).
Once he is served with the inevitable AVO, he is totally powerless: she can then go to the local family court, take the house, all of his savings, his motor vehicle and of course because she is a vulnerable ‘victim’ as a ‘new Australian’, he must continue to pay ‘spouse support’ payments, for as long as the totally corrupt and feminist friendly, sexual trade union owned and operated Family Court directs…
It’s interesting because I’m sure those women couldn’t do anything like that in their home countries, because if they could, why would they need to go to all of that trouble, (takes about 3 years from start to finish – when she gets his entire fortune) and travel all the way to Australia, to take advantage of its misandrous family court laws, if they could do it at home?
If they tried it in their home country, I’m sure it would be treated as a crime, such as fraud and she would probably be appropriately charged and punished.
If these new EU legislative measures were even slightly fair (i.e. NOT written to criminalize the actions or behaviour of only MEN, but all ‘persons’), those scammers could be in a bit of strife, but the way things are at present, they are free to come to Australia and destroy as many men as they want and enjoy ‘overnight wealth’ at the expense of any man, whenever they please.
Interestingly too, the women knew about all of the local female ‘victim protection’ or DV laws thanks to a video that was circulated around all of the E. European countries by our very own (feminist influenced) Immigration Department, under the guise of highlighting Australia as an ideal tourism destination. (Yeah, as if they could afford to do that, but if an Australian loser of a man pays her way: no problem). On the night the 60 Minutes story was screened, they actually played parts of that video (the English language version) and we could clearly hear a femi-hag sounding narrator emphasising throughout the 30 minute video, the fact that a man could be successfully prosecuted in the Australian Family Court system, without corroborating evidence or witnesses!
Read about it here, here or here. It is also believed that only a fraction of these scams are reported, because the men (real victims of sexist abuse) are too embarrassed to report it or even discuss it with their families or friends. The men who appeared on the 60 Minutes story, were apparently the only ones they could convince (probably with a subsatntial cash reward) to be interviewed out of hundreds of victims, the 60 Minutes crew had approached…
Its funny the way they think they understand erections but we do not understand periods!