Where are the London Olympics Sex Trafficking Victims?
A statement from the Metropolitan police themselves :
In preparation for the Olympics the TPU [Trafficking and Prostitution Unit] has created a dedicated team funded by the Migration Impact Fund (Government Funding) to combat all areas of trafficking and prostitution on the five Olympic Boroughs. The team is comprised of SCD9 funded officers and three fully funded posts from the Migration Impact Fund. [The Met unit SCD9 human exploitation and organised crime command, created in April 2010, is responsible for investigating trafficking. In 2010 – 2011 the SCD9 budget is £7.3m] The funding for these three officer posts will cease in July 2012. This team works closely with TP BOCUS to tackle both on and off street prostitution and continues to advise in planning and delivering covert solutions to tackle the criminality. The intelligence currently held does not support any increase in prostitution in the Olympic Boroughs and actually shows a decrease in some locations. The TPU are continually monitoring this situation.
Meanwhile, the BBC reports on women who pay to have sex with male prostitutes in South Korea :
South Korea has seen a rise in the number of women seeking paid male company, with a boom in “host bars” over the last decade.
Women can wield a new kind of freedom, and economic power, in the all-night drinking rooms.
Seoul correspondent Lucy Williamson spoke to male host “James” about his work, and how some women may want more than just sex.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9744000/9744718.stm
Indeed when women pay for sex it’s “a new kind of freedom”.
On a similar topic, see the Wikipedia article on female sex tourism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_sex_tourism
This wikipedia article exists only in English and Chinese. At least it makes an attempt at being unbiased.
Jack
17 Sep 12 at 10:22 pm
whelp… I remember when Germany hosted the World Cup in 2006… and all the horror scenarios of tens of thousands of prostitutes (of course, all of them presumably trafficked) that we were going to see during the cup… the U.S. government even felt compelled to weigh in and pressure Germany to repeal its permissive 2002 Prostitution Act… see here, for example:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/german-government-blasted-for-facilitating-massive-prostitution-at-world-cu
At the end of the day, the increase in prostitutes, either voluntary or forced, was close to zip. And not only that, business for the working prostitutes was slower than expected because foreign fans were too busy celebrating and drinking…
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/03/world/europe/03berlin.html
inclinedreader
17 Sep 12 at 10:42 pm
Those experts being the same ones that are making the same bogus and totally fabricated claims about sex-trafficking and enslavement of ‘vulnerable women’ today: Bitter and jealous ugly middle-aged femihags from the various international gynocracies and the UN.
Alan Vaughn
17 Sep 12 at 10:54 pm
Double Standard.
Anonymous
18 Sep 12 at 3:18 am
I’ve seen this hysteria over prostitution promoted at all international events since the Atlanta Olympics, and also trotted out for the US football Superbowl – come to think of it it was also used to pressure Craigslist to remove their adult services section.
This bs keeps the narrative going that men are oppressors of women, milks the government teat to give more money to women’s programs, transfers money from men to government/women through criminal charges, etc… It will soon be used to abuse international male travelers, unless they travel with a woman or are clearly on business, as it will be assumed they’re traveling as a sex tourist – this presumption will of course not apply to women.
Alex
18 Sep 12 at 3:37 am
Alex
Did you not see the second article in the post:
Meanwhile, the BBC reports on women who pay to have sex with male prostitutes in South Korea :
……………
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9744000/9744718.stm
Alan Vaughn
18 Sep 12 at 3:52 am
The STU will probably spin this by arguing that all the money spent prevented so much sex traffic that the numbers of victims were much less than feared. They always make the same argument for spending on the drug war…
Eric
18 Sep 12 at 4:30 am
And the same experts will conjure up the same stories about the forthcoming events in Brazil, where it will provide an excuse for completing the crackdown alrready well under way in that country. What such stories never say is that the demographics of events like the Olympic games mean an [b] influx of male for the benefit of the local females.[/b]
Jack
18 Sep 12 at 7:58 am
And not the middle-aged fat sex tourist stereotype either.
I mentioned here before that I’m in pretty good shape (or at least look in pretty good shape, haha) but this summer I felt like a dwarf amongst men sometimes living in london. And it’s not just the thousands of athletes – its’ their coaches, relatives and friends who travel with them etc and general supporters of Olympic events tend to be have better physiques than say, football fans.
theantifeminist
18 Sep 12 at 8:08 am
I think it was ECAPT – one of the largest sexual trade union NGOs in the world – that forced airlines flying to South America to play a lengthy and shaming anti-sex tourism video inflight. Of course all the ‘sex tourists’ depicted are male. Must have been very uncomfortable for any male travelling alone, ‘sex tourist’ or not.
I’ve watched the video (on YouTube). What’s interesting about it is a particular scene which is set in a nightclub and has a man apparently approaching and dancing with a young girl (looks around 16). In other words, the sexual trade union considers even men who try to pick up young females in nightclubs to be evil sex tourists (sorry Roosh).
theantifeminist
18 Sep 12 at 8:15 am
Antifeminist:
Somewhat OT, but relevant to the subject of media lies: Fidelbogen posted a video clip from AVfM News (his Sept. 13th post) which exposed one of journalists who’d written a hit-piece about the campaign as one of the protesters tearing down posters! LOL
http://www.counterfem.blogspot.com
Eric
18 Sep 12 at 10:05 am
funny you should say that… I have a friend who works for a major international company… since his last promotion, he now flies to Bangkok by himself a few times a year to oversee business at their Thai branch. It has happened to him one or two times that Thai police pulled him aside at the airport for questioning because he “fit the profile” of white early middle age men traveling alone, who often come to Thailand looking for sex with underage prostitutes or children. My friend told them “Look, I fly business class and I have a briefcase with me, you’re welcome to glance at my business papers… do I look like that kind of person to you??”… but they told him that some child sex tourists now go to some lengths to go undetected, and that they have even caught businessmen who sought out underage prostitutes after hours while they were on their business trip.
You see, you don’t even have to be the supposedly obvious sex tourist anymore. It’s enough if you go to Thailand by yourself with a penis between your legs.
inclinedreader
18 Sep 12 at 11:22 am
Yep, its confirmed then: we really have reached the feminist totalitarian state I often say we are headed for.
This just reminded me and maybe slightly OT, but I heard on the radio last Friday how (in Queensland Australia), convicted sex-offenders are not going to be released from prison, even if the time they were sentenced to has been reached (assuming no parole).
This will soon be at the discretion of his probation officer, parole board, social workers and other misandrists, such as lesbian femihag social workers, self-appointed (satanic ritual believing) psychologists, white-knights and obedient manginas etc…
Under this new proposal put before Parliament on Friday: every misandric and incompetent charlatan, except the court that originally tried, convicted and sentenced him, will effectively put him on trial again and in the most biased (against him) manner: determine whether or not he will EVER be released…
Meanwhile: any convicted triple murderer sentenced to 25 years could be out on the streets again tio kill some more innocent people after as little as 12 years, for ‘good behaviour’.
The convicted sex-offender’s post sentencing behaviour (whilst he’s in prison and possibly being raped and beaten every second day), isn’t even considered…
Let’s not forget too, that a convicted ‘sex-offender’ could merely be some unfortunate married family man, even highly respected by his local community, who was caught downloading photographs of 15 or 16 year old fully clothed children, smiling provocatively.
Such a serious sex-offence would make him the most serious and ‘dangerous’ of all offender types: a confirmed paedophile…
According to the feminist totalitarian government: those child pornography (paedophile) offenders are much more dangerous even than convicted murderers; and anyone (such as myself) who dares to question these laws that are there only to ‘protect children from harm’: are at least as dangerous as the sick paedophiles too, because to dare to dispute the gynocracy and their child protection laws means he IS a paedophile!
Isn’t it great to see how rampant paedohysteria ensures all our children are safe from the only danger they will ever face: sexual abuse from adult white men!
Alan Vaughn
18 Sep 12 at 12:19 pm
Meanwhile: any convicted triple murderer sentenced to 25 years could be out on the streets again tio kill some more innocent people after as little as 12 years, for ‘good behaviour’. Like Dutroux’s wife Michèle Martin in Belgium. I often think women actually like this shit, I mean serial killers being freed while unviolent offenders die in jail. It panders to their thirst for injustice, abusive power and festering corruption. Nero, Caligula, the Ottoman Sultans, they’re the women’s heros. Is feminism a big shit test that will only end when men see it for what it is? Are feminists just piling it on thicker and thicker to test to what depth of enslavement and decadence men will let themselves be pushed?
Jack
18 Sep 12 at 1:53 pm
I’m sorry Alan, I missed that reference – I was eating dinner, and had Terminator 3 running at the same time I was scanning the article – my attention was going back and forth.
I do have the slightest personal preview of what’s coming though. My father is retired in Vung Tau, Vietnam. Last time I visited him, the customs people asked me the purpose of my visit, and I told them I was vacationing – they looked at me, my passport, and told me that the E.U. has laws against sex tourism( I live in the US now but I’m not a US national).
I told her my father’s name, gave her his address and invited her to investigate the matter. She apologized to me, said she was just informing me of the fact, not making any accusation against me and bid me good day – I didn’t believe her and I think a presumption was made that day, which, if I were a single woman visiting Vietnam, would not have been made.
I will say that once you pass the border, the women of Vietnam are a breath of sweet, fresh air, when compared to Western feminists – I recommend a visit there to any battle scarred male from the Western hemisphere, and the food is fantastic.
Alex
18 Sep 12 at 5:55 pm
“What’s interesting about it is a particular scene which is set in a nightclub and has a man apparently approaching and dancing with a young girl (looks around 16). In other words, the sexual trade union considers even men who try to pick up young females in nightclubs to be evil sex tourists”
—–
Those females that are making the transition from young women to bitter middle aged or over the hill feminists just hate competition since they don’t have much to offer. Let’s see, do I date a pretty, young woman who is not jaded, who doesn’t hate me for being a man, doesn’t make snide remarks, who genuinely appreciates me or do I go the exact opposite way. Yeah, that’s a hard choice.
Alex
18 Sep 12 at 6:05 pm
Jack,
Well it seems that way doesn’t it? Or are men just so dumbed down by years of constant propaganda being pumped into them from all the possible sources their paedohysterical feminized society can throw at them, they just cannot and perhaps will not ever: see the timber for all those trees?
Feminism has effectively distorted, quite markedly: the image western men see of themselves. Most men as you and other commentators here know, are totally accepting and even supportive of feminism. They don’t even see themselves as men anymore.
For a good example of what you’re referring to: read Angry Harry’s summary on how the feminist police state encourages and EXPECTS men to treat each other and how to be good law-abiding
white-knighting manginascitizens…Alan Vaughn
18 Sep 12 at 9:08 pm
Alex:
The femihags actually work provisions like this into things like trade agreements. For example, the Vietnamese customs officials are probably forced to ask any man with an EU passport as some condition of an EU trade-policy. They might not say that to non-EU passport holders.
In a way, I understand the Vietnamese government’s position. They realize, I’m sure, that the EU is run by a bunch of undersexed, paedohysterical fruitcakes who return from Vietnam to screech loudly to the European press about ‘sex tourism’. By putting up a little token resistance, they save themselves a lot of negative press.
That said, though, Vietnamese woman are well-spoken of everywhere. I’ve met a few in the US, and they’re like a breath of fresh air even here. It’s amazing in America, how you go to an immigrant district in a large city and the women are completely different. It’s even better abroad, where the women are walking on eggshells for fear of offending the femihag thought police.
Eric
19 Sep 12 at 5:12 am
Eric & Alex:
I’ve traveled to 4 different SE Asian countries over the past 10 years or so, but thus far haven’t entered Vietnam.
Whilst I’ve never been questioned (interrogated) by anyone when entering those countries (I hold an Australian Passport) in the way you were Alex, I have yet to stay in a hotel that does NOT display somewhere: some feminazi inspired poster or at least a smaller (about 6″ x 4″) sticker, usually found in the closets or bathrooms, with all these warnings on the consequences of ‘child sex tourism’ and others that strongly encourage people to report any foreign man that may look like he could be a ‘child-sex tourist’…
theantifeminist commented here at the end of one of his recent posts on how ‘the state now owns your penis’, if you are an EU citizen and those posters and stickers I saw everywhere that foreigners are likely to be present: confirmed that the state does indeed own you and your penis; even when you’re in another country, minding your own business.
Alan Vaughn
19 Sep 12 at 5:39 am
Alan & Alex:
The US has been forcing this kind of thing on other countries for awhile now, but it’s gotten way worse with Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama sticking their feminist fingers in everybody’s pies.
Bush Junior actually set up an FBI task force that monitored internet communications between ‘underage’ foreign women and American men. Even if a man goes to a country where that’s legal, the FBI can charge him under US law when he gets back to America. Hillary and her feminist friends have tried get Interpol involved (don’t know if they’ve succeeded yet). But one thing they have done is increased surveillance on Americans travelling to or working in other countries and communicating with foreign nationals.
They try to pretend that it’s all about counterterrorism or national security, but it’s obvious from the fact that they’ve broken up more pornography rings than drug, terror, or spy rings, that sex is their real focus.
Eric
19 Sep 12 at 8:28 am
@Eric
I saw something recently describing how Facebook has installed software (at the FBIs request) that can identify when a person over 18 is arranging a meeting with a minor. The software automatically alerts the FBI. The EU has demanded that Google install similar software that alerts police when suspect search terms are entered (i.e. ‘teen porn’, ‘sex tourism’, ‘meet girls in Thailand’, ‘I don’t like feminism’.)
Regarding the ‘underage’ foreign women. The EU has recently made it illegal even within the European Union for a man to have sex with a girl in another EU state if she is underage in his own country, even if she is legal in the EU country he is resident in. So a British man (UK age of consent 16) would face prosecution if he had sex with a 15 year old girl in France (age of consent 15). From what I’ve read, the EU is providing millions of Euros to educate local law enforcement, courts etc of this law. The state really does own your penis now.
A British man could live in Spain (age of consent 13) for 20 years, and then be hauled back to the UK for life as a nonce if he has sex once with the local 15 year old cum bucket. His Spanish neighbour however, could fuck the same girl and even boast about it to his mates. In fact, his German or French neighbour could as well (age of consent Germany 14). But because the British man’s penis came into the world in the geographic location of the UK, he will be extradited back to the UK to face rape and beatings in a British prison.
This seems a lot like racial discrimination to me. In fact no more just than the laws that banned interracial sex. Meanwhile, the paedophile Alan Turing, who was chemically castrated for having sex with a 19 year old teenager (that’s the only one we know about) has been turned into a martyr in the UK because he was ‘discriminated against’. Even though homosexuality was illegal at the time, he didn’t do anything wrong because heterosexual men were/are allowed to bang 19 year old girls. Similarly, all gay men who have criminal records for having consensual sex with over 16′s have been pardoned (last week) and had their records expunged.
Social justice, femi style.
EDIT : Meanwhile, feminist groups are free to promote ‘abortion toursim’ (i.e. child murder tourism) within the EU : http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive//ldn/2010/mar/10031512
theantifeminist
19 Sep 12 at 9:08 am
@theantifeminist
I heard about that quite a few months ago (on the radio news actually – I do a lot of driving in my job, if you’ve noticed that I often mention hearing things on radio news brodcasts).
I had a Facebook account for a few weeks when it was first introduced in around 2006, but soon deleted it after a certain resentful, bitter and jealous femi-hag ex-defacto partner of mine found it and started spewing threats (such as a false statutory rape accusation) all over it…
Thus I haven’t operated a social-networking site for a few years now, however
since hearing that story: I will NEVER participate in any of those social networking sites, such as facebook, twitter, Bebo or tumblr and so on again; not only because of the FBI’s spyware, but also because I’ve always suspected that the International gynocratic led totalitarian and misandrist western governments, introduced this so-called ‘social-networking’ to provide them with the means for monitoring anyone’s activities and storing the information in some huge database for ‘social engineering’ purposes.
Social engineering purposes such as fanning paedohysteria, persecution and rape of the male, indoctrinating children to hate all men etc., etc…
Alan Vaughn
19 Sep 12 at 10:38 am
Yeah, Eric, I considered that she might be required to mention that fact, which is why I did not show any annoyance, though I felt it. Also, with Asians in general you have to keep in mind that preserving face for both parties is important with them, so she did the best she could, if in fact she was required to do so. She did that by stating that fact, rather than accusing me directly. So, I could lose no face because she was not saying I was a child molester, and she could lose no face for the same reason if I were there for a legitimate purpose – she was just stating a fact, not accusing an innocent man.
Anyway, I just got off a long, sometimes uncomfortable flight(any long flight is) where I felt cooped up like a chicken, perhaps I’d tugged at my clothes to cool down, my beard was coming in, a look of starvation in my eyes from refusing to eat airline food – LOL – I might have looked like a desperate deviant.
Alan, since you travel SE Asia, I do suggest a visit to Vietnam. The people are friendly and welcoming, which is surprising given the abuse they’ve suffered from invasions/colonizations through their history. I’ve also heard Burmese food is fantastic, a blend of Indian and SE Asian flavors, which might make it worth a detour for me and perhaps for you – I’m not a sex tourist, but I am an extreme food tourist!
The surveillance you’re all describing, of men communicating with foreign women, is both hypocritical and easy to see through – it’s mean to operate as a cattle chute, relying on fines and fear to drive men away from feminine foreign women, and channel them to the fat, loud mouthed, middle aged, tattooed, ex penis wranglers – who need financial provisioning and insemination – of the Western hemisphere. Without such financial provisioning and divorce theft, the government will have to pick up the slack for these women and their bastard children, all the while being nagged to death for not doing enough.
I feel sorry for the men going along with the program, following the script that’s laid out for them, but it’s their fault – you always have to examine the carrot, and be wary of the stick, when contracting with government and/or women.
Alex
19 Sep 12 at 6:38 pm
Antifeminist:
It’s the same with US states as it is with the EU. For example, if a man marries a 16 y/o in a state where it’s legal, he can be charged with stautorary rape if he goes to a state where the AOC is higher.
In reality, it’s illegal for the states to do that, because our Constitution specifically states that a legally-binding contract in one state is valid in all states. But Hillary and her cohorts make sure that the law is never enforced (except for gay marriage; the feds are trying to force it on all states, using the same law they won’t enforce for heterosexuals).
The FBI espionage on social networks is the same thing. They get away with it by envoking an elastic interpretation of an early Sufferagette-inspired law that makes it a federal offence to cross state boundaries for purposes of soliciting ‘minors.’ That law (the ironically-named Mann Act) was originally supposedly aimed at sex-trafficking and prostitution but the feminists have radically extended its scope.
Eric
20 Sep 12 at 4:38 am
Alex:
That’s very well said. Like you pointed out about Mark Driscoll, he can’t even sell his ‘man up’ message to his congregation except by shaming men over their patriotism and religious commitment.
The same effect happened on a minor frolic I took recently through an MSM relationship blog. When I brought up the subject of foreign women, the femihag and white-knight shaming tactics came out. But not a single one of them could come up with even ONE reason why American women were better than foreign ones.
Whenever feminists and manginas start shouting about ‘negative male attitudes about American women’ nothing shuts them up faster than asking them to say something positive themselves. I suspect it’s the same with Australian, British, and Canadian white knights too.
Eric
20 Sep 12 at 4:49 am