They worked their way into politics and business as a means of economic and sexual survival. They were also young when they began their climb up the ladder (individually).

I’ve never said that older women suddenly ‘got jealous’ the moment the pill was introduced. Much of the early second wave of feminism was sex positive and much of it was carried through by young women. The rush into education was caused largely by the pill, aided by other technological advances – such as domestic appliances, that enabled women to delay marriage and to want and to have careers and an education. But a lot of the sudden politicisation of young women in the 60′s and 70′s was brought about by the rather sudden sexual revolution. For example, despite the pill, unwanted pregnancies actually increased – necessitating young women to politically campaign for the ‘right’ to have an abortion.

Most of this process isn’t fully conscious, and parts of it lead to vicious cycles. For example, the rush into education further increased the numbers of single young women in the free sexual market (and who were mixing with similar young men, further creating a loosening of sexual mores).

And I don’t think there’s actually much reasoning involved in feminism, apart from deceitful self-rationalisation.

http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2010/08/no-fault-divorce-wins-again/

The statistics do not say what causes the rise.

Note that feminism can work both ways. On the one hand women are encouraged to file for divorce because for them it is a win-win situation. On the other hand men who face ruin and the loss of their children would try to avoid divorce at all cost.

I was a successful guy and the family type, I believed in the ‘system’ and was happy to marry. Having done so, and given life to offspring #1 (otherwise known as mealticket #1) she promptly shagged someone else and decided I should be got rid of. Not just split up but formally thrown out of house on trumped up domestic violence allegations (prove false) but also prevented from ever seeing my child as that maximised her ‘child support’. Also got 100% equity, home, all our goodies and my pension. I was wiped out on the grounds of feminist forced legislation that only needs a false allegation or 10 to utterly destroy a mans life and to set herself up in luxury when she wants a different model. I thought it couldn’t get worse.

Some years later, along comes wife number 2. Very sympathetic and supportive of years of endless fighting just to be able to see my child. Ultimately, she got bored of how badly ‘we were being treated’ so guess what… she decided to jump on the bangwagon explaining to me that I was weak and probably deserved it. I was not weak, just subject to horrifically anti-male legislation and discrimination at every turn and through every official state body. All the while, my child suffers and screams to anyone that will listen that she loves me and wants to live with me. No body cares, mothers rights surpass the childs 97% of the time (look at ‘contested’ custody case outcomes to appreciate that one, where both parties are equally capabale but the outcome always goes only in one direction).

So wife number 2 contacts and colludes with wife number 1, outcome is now loss of all three of my children (i from first marraige, 2 from second) and again loss of home, pension, goods etc… But it gets worse. This time they take my inheritance (required to care for my father in a home) as the childs interests (read mothers) are paramount. So she gets my fathers life savings as well as mine. The state then pursue me for my fathers money back, ignoring that a feminist judge gave it to someone else, without any reason. So, now I’ve had orders preventing me from being paid until an enourmous amount of money is paid back to my father by me (meaning I can earn zero income for the next four years – food clearly no required) and they’ve totally emptied my bank account.

The CCJ’s imposed on me (innocent victim of two utter bitches) mean I can’t rent, set up a business of my own or buy anywhere to live. I rely on male friends sofa to live on now. The lying bitches even spread their false allegations of DV and child abuse (securing hem sole custody of the children) amongst my industry and friends to deny me a job in my chosen profession and to fully ostracise me from society.

Nearly 10 years of fighting this crap in an anti-male family court room behind closed doors and the outcome? An admission they made it up. No apology, recompense or correction of the curent situation. See, women have won the right to make allegations without any repercussion. This means it’s a legitimate tactic to use against a man to extract every last penny out of him then move on. Screwing men over has now become a state sanctioned career option for the slightly smarter woman.

This is the case in almost every develped country and it’s getting worse by the year. I shan’t bore you with any more but it’s an area I’ve long researched and campaigned in. The average bloke on the street has no idea what awaits him when he is no longer required or what can be done to him when little missy descides she wants cash.

It is a truly horrific world we are creating for our sons. Ironically, these women are often mothers of sons and think not for a secod how they contribute towards destrying their own children some way down the line.

Wake up mangina’s, you’re ignorance will bring you down.

1) has the sympathy of public opinion and part of the media
2) doesn’t get raped or tortured in jail
3) lives to write a best-seller

The article stops short of suggesting that in similar cases, the young male should be the one going to jail, but it goes a long way towards making the point that the female should not.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/04/15/the-sex-police-state/

“William F. Buckley reminisces about a dinner in Monaco with Prince Rainier and David Niven:
“Waiting for the first course to arrive, David Launched into an autobiographical account of his seduction at age 15 by an accomplished lady of the night. The words spoken were lightly ribald, amusing, evocative. Before the second course was served, the prince was a rollicking companion…” (William F. Buckley, “10 Friends,” Forbes FYI, Fall 2000, p. 138.)
Obviously, in telling this “ribald” and “rollicking” tale, Niven didn’t think of himself as a “victim” of “rape” or “child sexual abuse.” Nor did Buckley, Rainier, or anyone else, male or female, think any such thing. Nor, apparently, did Buckley and the editors of Forbes FYI think any such thing in 2000, when this article was published. And indeed, even today, many people would react like the prince or with a more subdued amusement.

But if Niven were alive today and had “launched” into this “autobiographical account” as the guest speaker at a convention of “mental health professionals,” social workers, police investigators, victim’s advocates, prosecutors, and judges, virtually no one would be “rollicking,” or even mildly amused. At best or worst, there might be some nervous laughter concealed by hands over mouths. Almost to a man, and especially woman, poor David would be viewed as a “victim” of “child sexual abuse,” and his delight in telling this story would be attributed to “denial” and/or “male socialization.” The virtually unanimous response would be indignation, for many even rage, directed at the “rapist” and especially a society that could brainwash a “victim” and “survivor” into believing he enjoyed a heinous and life-destroying violation.

If Niven’s joyous “rite of passage” or “coming of age” had occurred in America today and was reported to the authorities, the “accomplished lady of the night” would be sentenced to anywhere from 6-months in county jail, if lucky, to 10 years in prison. At sentencing, prosecutors and psychiatrists would compare his trauma to that of people who’ve experienced warfare, torture, vicious beatings, dog attacks, gruesome car accidents, and internment in concentration camps. The woman would be classified as a deviant and compelled to underago “sex-offender treatment” as well as register with the police for 20 years if not the rest of her life so people could be notifed that a “convicted sex offender” is living in their community or neighborhood. And so, too, with the woman played by Jennifer O’Neal in The Summer of 42. If this movie were remade today, it should end or begin with Jennifer O’Neal being transported to prison in handcuffs attached to a waistchain and leg-irons.”

I’d wager that if your ovaries & fallopian tubes were pulled out of your body, they’d be an even weaker point & more vulnerable than male jewels.

Of course the vagina was decreed to be tough in planning women to survive in their 2nd most important career… that of the World’s Oldest Profession in rendering service to man after man’s tool of relentlessly pounding steel swooning away the helpmate unto the French “Little Death”. As the French originated the saying “The penis is a shark and must be fed”.

Surely one’s intellectual capacities are adequate to comprehend that men don’t (& have no need to) excrete an object the size of a cantalope melon through their sex organ, while women do?

The Originator of the female species decreed there to be multiplied travail & anguish in excreting cantalope sized objects… surely you wouldn’t have “non-tough” women to all perish in excreting the male progeny?

But do recall a balance for the so called “weakness” of the family jewels was decreed long ago, many thousands of years ago in fact… Namely that if a woman reached forth her hand to grab one of two fighting men’s testicles in order to help the other win, her hand was to be chopped off … I believe the quote from her Creator was “Thou shalt show her no pity”… see. all things balance out in karma.