Feminism does not represent the final flowering of Western liberalism or of Enlightenment values. Rather, it is an aggressive counter-reaction intended to protect the threatened reproductive and sexual interests of middle-class, middle-aged women in a free sexual marketplace.
Women have completely overturned a 10,000 year + patriarchal system in the space of a generation, and they have done so (in my opinion and the opinion of respected authors such as the anthropologist Lionel Tiger) as soon as they needed to. That is, when the introduction of the contraceptive pill in the 1960′s revolutionised the dynamics of the sexual marketplace and impelled women to take on an independent political and economic role to secure their reproductive needs.
Yet, having a society base its morals and social structure upon the primitive reproductive urgings of one sex alone degrades women, degrades men, degrades civilization and, in fact, turns the western humanist world into nothing more than a ‘secular’ and feminised version of an Islamic fundamentalist state under Sharia law.
Actually, men in the west are far worse off than women under Sharia, as at least Islamic law does cater for the basic needs of women (which are largely reproductive). This is why feminists are so reluctant to criticise ‘the oppression of women’ under Islam and often appear to even support it.
http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/05/20/the-history-of-feminism-as-a-sexual-trade-union/
Hi there
I’m writing an article about men and feminism for Standpoint magazine and wondered if someone from this blog would be interested in contributing. It would be looking at why men have never felt it was in their interests to support the women’s movement , with a look at how feminism has disenfranchised men over the years, and an assessment of the current state of play.
If anybody is interested in contributing, do please just drop me a line on the above email, or call me on +44 779 2141827.
Best wishes,
Nichi
I just discovered that your WHOLE youtube’s channel was deleted, what a great proof of liberty of speech !
Could you repost most of the videos on dailymotion? I am particularly looking for the introductory clip about Schopenhauer.
Yep, and not just deleted – TERMINATED! Lol! I’ve also been banned by the feminist moderators at Reddit/r/mensrights, as well as having a book review removed from Amazon at the request of feminists.
I still have all my videos on hard disk, so I’ll try to upload them at dailymotion sometime soon. That Schopenhauer clip was part of a documentary series on Western Philosophy. You can download the whole thing from Pirate Bay.
I was going to suggest you to burn them into DVDs. But you putting them up on PirateBay seems to be most ingenious.
How about putting them on Megaupload or Rapidshare, as I would have to seed back using the torrents and that would increase my Transfer Cap.
Good suggestions Anon, I might do that.
What should I be looking for on Pirate Bay (or from any other websites)?
“I just discovered that your WHOLE youtube’s channel was deleted, what a great proof of liberty of speech !”
What a great proof that he’s definitely hitting the freakin’ mark!
When you get them up on Dailymotion you’ll be sure to let everyone know they were banned from Youtube right?
They are Evil bastards…
such a shame. Fack feminism….
These feminists don’t know who there fucking with. They are really trying to push censorship, on informative MRA videos. There will come a time when us men will be fed up with this bullshit. They will know what equality is all about, and I for one am tired of living in world were men are subjugated just for being men. Believe you me these women will pay for their crimes. Censoring us is the last thing they want to do because it will give us more of an incentive to exposure them further more. They will pay for all the murdered babies aborted against their will, all the children being abused and killed consequently, and all the pain men have to endure through unjust laws and the losses of many men fighting phony wars for a misandric government that enslaves men collectively.
“They are really trying to push censorship, on informative MRA videos.”
Thing is there are still loads of anti-feminist videos on Youtube which are far more (blatantly) ‘sexist’ or ‘misogynistic’.
So why have his been singled out unless he’s really struck a nerve?
THEY have obviously been paying attention to this guy even if 95% of the manosphere has not been.
Any doubts I may have had about this sexual trade union theory have now been completely laid to rest.
It is now just a matter of extrapolation….
Why did Christianity dominated the western world for two thousand years?
Because it served it’s purpose very well. And it’s purpose? To wage war upon the sexuality of men and the ‘upper crust’ of womanhood. Why? To protect the pussy cartel.
But when religious authority started to erode due to the discoveries of science (especially after Darwin’s publication) it became more difficult to ‘slut shame’ beautiful young women from using their sexuality to their advantage. So in urban areas prostitution began to boom.
So the not so cute majority of women had to come up with a NEW religion. And that religion was feminism. At first little different from Christianity but with the exaption of cultural marxism it has come into it’s own.
It’s starting to develop into a great theory EWM. You should write an extended essay and post it online, put it on p2p networks etc.
I think it would be extremely worthwhile and interesting to research the role that female support and conversion played in the early Christian movement and why it quickly took hold of the Roman Empire.
Feminism: Revenge of the Ugly Women
What’s it like, being a chromosomal defect?
Aside from making you extremely nasty, angry and generally fucked-up?
Aside from that, we create civilizations.
Men are no a chromosonal defect lol. MIT have discovered the Y Chromosone is the most evolutionary dynamic part of the human genome. Any changes or advancements in humanity for that matter will come from men. NOT women. With out the Y chromosone there would be no X chromosone and also no humanity. Seems having two X’s is a bit useless dont ya think?
How does establishing a hierarchy of gender serve the greater purpose of society? Do we not need both XX and XY to have a harmonious society?
I came across a comment about the article on the 14 year old promiscuous Muslim girl that was murdered by her mother, and you pretty much said she deserved it for being a “slut”.
Our children are representations of ourselves. The mother was obviously a nutjob that couldn’t raise her daughter correctly. Her insanity is exacerbated by the fact she murdered her own child.
No child deserves to be murdered. And I personally think it’s disgusting for you to say so.
What the hell are you talking about it you idiot? In no way would I ever say she deserved it. I’m the last person in the men’s rights movement who would see sexually active 14 year old girls as ‘sluts’ (in a moral way), let alone say ‘she deserved to be killed’ and if there are such puritan psychopaths in our movement then I’ll piss on them in hell. I was pointing out that it was a feminist judge who more or less was saying that in letting the bitch of a mother go free.
You stupid fucking bitch, learn to read.
Hhahahah
Hi theantifeminist,
I stumbled across your site whilst researching for my current college project. I’m looking into the social effect of feminism on men and your site has some interesting points on men’s rights. I wondered if you would mind clarifying for me the overall aim of anti-feminism and what precisely you feel you are fighting against. Would you say that the whole of the feminist movement has been a disaster or are you just trying to defend men’s rights against feminist extremists?
Gala,
follow the links on the right side. The blogroll.
Dozens of sites writing about these subjects. Including my http://human-stupidity.com
Feminism has conquered the United Nations, most governments:
Men in Britain go to jail if they do DNA test on their (alleged) children
Men in the USA have to pay child support for children they PROVED are not theirs
Men everywhere go to jail for possessing nude photos of 17 year olds (while distribution of beheading-islamic-hostage-videos or gang-clubbing-teen-to-death videos is ok.
It is not the fringe.
“Men in Britain go to jail if they do DNA test on their (alleged) children
Men in the USA have to pay child support for children they PROVED are not theirs
Men everywhere go to jail for possessing nude photos of 17 year olds (while distribution of beheading-islamic-hostage-videos or gang-clubbing-teen-to-death videos is ok).”
Fucking Hell. We’ve been ostricised!!!!!
Please don’t tell me those first two sentences of yours are true!
Hi there,
I wonder if you could point out any feminists who support Muslim women’s subjugation? Because there are many feminists who have the opposite view.
Also, you seem to have a very muddled cause-and-effect argument about contraception and the rise of feminism. Could you clarify? Women started using the Pill and…what? Started subjugating men? Your argument is so muddled it hardly makes sense.
Cheers.
No. I make three assumptions about my readers when writing this blog 1/ they are above average iq, 2/ they read my articles and 3/ they are not feminist/mangina trolls.
You clearly fail all three of my requirements and hence you are banned.
Found that men only wanted the younger attractive girls using the pill, and thus took a more active role in politics in order to close the free sexual market. How much simpler does a theory need to be for you to grasp it?
I would actually class myself as one of those “younger attractive” girls. I’m still a feminist. Have you ever met a feminist? Have you ever met a woman?
I also have a high IQ and a degree from a top UK university. Would you like to explain how someone like me has become a feminist? Personally I put it down to intelligence, political, cultural and religious awareness and personal respect. But that’s all wrong. Right?
If you have a degree then you’re already well past peak sexual attractiveness and in a truly free sexual market most men probably wouldn’t even look at you.
P.S. I love that you can’t answer my other posts! It’s because you can’t answer them, right? Are you worried that if you display them, the knuckle-dragging trolls that frequent this site will finally see sense and realise that you’re an idiot? If you removed them because they were “abusive” then you’re a hypocrite and should probably also remove every article, comment, link and post from this horrendous site.
Yea, all my high IQ readers would drop down like spastics on reading lines of wisdom like this :
Now f*** off you retarded whore.
Scarlett Johansson is nowhere near as hot as she was at 17, and only gets that close because she’s a/ in the top 1% genetically gifted females for looks and b/ because she has Hollywood stylists and the money to buy whatever clothes and cosmetics she wants to.
Get over it, you’re not attractive, you lose whatever sexual value you have with each passing day, and if you really went to a top uni it says a lot about the British university system these days.
BTW, in every one of your comments you were abusive towards myself or my readers. I let you go far further than any feminist blog would allow an anti-feminist to go.
Can you tell me what percentage of leading feminists have ever spoken out against women’s supposed subjugation in the Islamic world?
For starters, both Germain Greer and Naomi Wolff have defended the Islamic practice of the hijab. Leading feminist politicians such as the former British home secretary Jacqui Smith have done the same – Smith once wearing the hijab herself – wish the fat ugly bitch would start wearing the burka.
cheers.
BULLSHIT.
What the FUCK is wrong with you people? Seriously. Who ate your soul when you were a child? Christ, they must have shriveled up and died afterwards. Which Algebra teacher molested you?
Or maybe you guys are all a bunch of thick-skulled nimrods. DING! Wow, we have found our answer.
Look, I can’t even comprehend how anyone on this entire planet can be as bigoted, selfish, and sexist as you animals.
So what, someone refuses to be your slave. So what, a girl isn’t willing to be your submissive little fucktoy purely meant for breeding. Get the fuck over it. Have any of you ever even met a woman, or are all of you just living on Planet Macho somewhere?
Woman are independent, and quite frankly, are stronger than men in many, many ways. Christ, they’d have to be, in order to put up with this close-minded primitive bullshit for thousands of years.
You assholes will never, ever be able to dominate womankind the way you’d like to, and you’ll never win with this type of shit.
P.S. Are you people gay? An honest question, considering that you guys hate women so much.
Oh wow. A self described mangina. Don’t you just love these retarded assholes?
This faggot has the audacity to bring up the gay question. How fucking original. Typical feminist cunt. The funny thing, you idiot, is that I KNOW more women who hate pieces of shit like you more than I do. The only bigots here are feminists. Sexist, man-hating bigots who aren’t worth the ground they walk on.
You people belong in cages with the rest of the animals. Look in a mirror and you’ll find your BULLSHIT!
“Tell me- why is it that people say ‘grow a pair of balls’ when they mean for someone to toughen up? Balls are weak and sensitive. If you really want to toughen up, grow a vagina. Now those really take a pounding.”
-Betty White
Just saying.
Anon, anon..
I’d wager that if your ovaries & fallopian tubes were pulled out of your body, they’d be an even weaker point & more vulnerable than male jewels.
Of course the vagina was decreed to be tough in planning women to survive in their 2nd most important career… that of the World’s Oldest Profession in rendering service to man after man’s tool of relentlessly pounding steel swooning away the helpmate unto the French “Little Death”. As the French originated the saying “The penis is a shark and must be fed”.
Surely one’s intellectual capacities are adequate to comprehend that men don’t (& have no need to) excrete an object the size of a cantalope melon through their sex organ, while women do?
The Originator of the female species decreed there to be multiplied travail & anguish in excreting cantalope sized objects… surely you wouldn’t have “non-tough” women to all perish in excreting the male progeny?
But do recall a balance for the so called “weakness” of the family jewels was decreed long ago, many thousands of years ago in fact… Namely that if a woman reached forth her hand to grab one of two fighting men’s testicles in order to help the other win, her hand was to be chopped off … I believe the quote from her Creator was “Thou shalt show her no pity”… see. all things balance out in karma.
In truth, I can fully support the right of women (as numerous others here):
http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/04/15/the-sex-police-state/
“William F. Buckley reminisces about a dinner in Monaco with Prince Rainier and David Niven:
“Waiting for the first course to arrive, David Launched into an autobiographical account of his seduction at age 15 by an accomplished lady of the night. The words spoken were lightly ribald, amusing, evocative. Before the second course was served, the prince was a rollicking companion…” (William F. Buckley, “10 Friends,” Forbes FYI, Fall 2000, p. 138.)
Obviously, in telling this “ribald” and “rollicking” tale, Niven didn’t think of himself as a “victim” of “rape” or “child sexual abuse.” Nor did Buckley, Rainier, or anyone else, male or female, think any such thing. Nor, apparently, did Buckley and the editors of Forbes FYI think any such thing in 2000, when this article was published. And indeed, even today, many people would react like the prince or with a more subdued amusement.
But if Niven were alive today and had “launched” into this “autobiographical account” as the guest speaker at a convention of “mental health professionals,” social workers, police investigators, victim’s advocates, prosecutors, and judges, virtually no one would be “rollicking,” or even mildly amused. At best or worst, there might be some nervous laughter concealed by hands over mouths. Almost to a man, and especially woman, poor David would be viewed as a “victim” of “child sexual abuse,” and his delight in telling this story would be attributed to “denial” and/or “male socialization.” The virtually unanimous response would be indignation, for many even rage, directed at the “rapist” and especially a society that could brainwash a “victim” and “survivor” into believing he enjoyed a heinous and life-destroying violation.
If Niven’s joyous “rite of passage” or “coming of age” had occurred in America today and was reported to the authorities, the “accomplished lady of the night” would be sentenced to anywhere from 6-months in county jail, if lucky, to 10 years in prison. At sentencing, prosecutors and psychiatrists would compare his trauma to that of people who’ve experienced warfare, torture, vicious beatings, dog attacks, gruesome car accidents, and internment in concentration camps. The woman would be classified as a deviant and compelled to underago “sex-offender treatment” as well as register with the police for 20 years if not the rest of her life so people could be notifed that a “convicted sex offender” is living in their community or neighborhood. And so, too, with the woman played by Jennifer O’Neal in The Summer of 42. If this movie were remade today, it should end or begin with Jennifer O’Neal being transported to prison in handcuffs attached to a waistchain and leg-irons.”
Except that unlike men convicted of the same “crime”, the woman:
1) has the sympathy of public opinion and part of the media
2) doesn’t get raped or tortured in jail
3) lives to write a best-seller
The article stops short of suggesting that in similar cases, the young male should be the one going to jail, but it goes a long way towards making the point that the female should not.
OK, some interesting dialogue. Allow me as a man to share a genuine experience, briefly, to explain to any retard who doesn’t believe the danger of modern feminism what they are up against. I lve in Britan and am subject to our secret family courts – just one of many tentacles of the octopus that is state entrenched feminazism.
I was a successful guy and the family type, I believed in the ‘system’ and was happy to marry. Having done so, and given life to offspring #1 (otherwise known as mealticket #1) she promptly shagged someone else and decided I should be got rid of. Not just split up but formally thrown out of house on trumped up domestic violence allegations (prove false) but also prevented from ever seeing my child as that maximised her ‘child support’. Also got 100% equity, home, all our goodies and my pension. I was wiped out on the grounds of feminist forced legislation that only needs a false allegation or 10 to utterly destroy a mans life and to set herself up in luxury when she wants a different model. I thought it couldn’t get worse.
Some years later, along comes wife number 2. Very sympathetic and supportive of years of endless fighting just to be able to see my child. Ultimately, she got bored of how badly ‘we were being treated’ so guess what… she decided to jump on the bangwagon explaining to me that I was weak and probably deserved it. I was not weak, just subject to horrifically anti-male legislation and discrimination at every turn and through every official state body. All the while, my child suffers and screams to anyone that will listen that she loves me and wants to live with me. No body cares, mothers rights surpass the childs 97% of the time (look at ‘contested’ custody case outcomes to appreciate that one, where both parties are equally capabale but the outcome always goes only in one direction).
So wife number 2 contacts and colludes with wife number 1, outcome is now loss of all three of my children (i from first marraige, 2 from second) and again loss of home, pension, goods etc… But it gets worse. This time they take my inheritance (required to care for my father in a home) as the childs interests (read mothers) are paramount. So she gets my fathers life savings as well as mine. The state then pursue me for my fathers money back, ignoring that a feminist judge gave it to someone else, without any reason. So, now I’ve had orders preventing me from being paid until an enourmous amount of money is paid back to my father by me (meaning I can earn zero income for the next four years – food clearly no required) and they’ve totally emptied my bank account.
The CCJ’s imposed on me (innocent victim of two utter bitches) mean I can’t rent, set up a business of my own or buy anywhere to live. I rely on male friends sofa to live on now. The lying bitches even spread their false allegations of DV and child abuse (securing hem sole custody of the children) amongst my industry and friends to deny me a job in my chosen profession and to fully ostracise me from society.
Nearly 10 years of fighting this crap in an anti-male family court room behind closed doors and the outcome? An admission they made it up. No apology, recompense or correction of the curent situation. See, women have won the right to make allegations without any repercussion. This means it’s a legitimate tactic to use against a man to extract every last penny out of him then move on. Screwing men over has now become a state sanctioned career option for the slightly smarter woman.
This is the case in almost every develped country and it’s getting worse by the year. I shan’t bore you with any more but it’s an area I’ve long researched and campaigned in. The average bloke on the street has no idea what awaits him when he is no longer required or what can be done to him when little missy descides she wants cash.
It is a truly horrific world we are creating for our sons. Ironically, these women are often mothers of sons and think not for a secod how they contribute towards destrying their own children some way down the line.
Wake up mangina’s, you’re ignorance will bring you down.
After what “your country” has done to you, you have a right to wish the Taliban to be not defeated, but to win and kill as many US-UK-EU soldiers as possible.
hy can you give me some info if feminism today causes more divorces than let’s say 50 years ago ,i’m doing a report over it and a neutral opinion would really help me out thanks
Below is a table of the historical divorce rates in the United States, from 1921-3 to 2007-9 :
http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2010/08/no-fault-divorce-wins-again/
The statistics do not say what causes the rise.
Note that feminism can work both ways. On the one hand women are encouraged to file for divorce because for them it is a win-win situation. On the other hand men who face ruin and the loss of their children would try to avoid divorce at all cost.
I just wanted to make sure I was getting this right: the underlying reasoning behind feminism is that when oral contraception became available, men could have sex with young (attractive) women without any long-term consequences (children, marriage) and because of this, older women were jealous that they were not receiving the same attention and thus worked their way into politics and business and academia as… an attempt to scorn men?
That’s rather a crude and inaccurate summary of what I’ve been saying here for the last 2 years.
They worked their way into politics and business as a means of economic and sexual survival. They were also young when they began their climb up the ladder (individually).
I’ve never said that older women suddenly ‘got jealous’ the moment the pill was introduced. Much of the early second wave of feminism was sex positive and much of it was carried through by young women. The rush into education was caused largely by the pill, aided by other technological advances – such as domestic appliances, that enabled women to delay marriage and to want and to have careers and an education. But a lot of the sudden politicisation of young women in the 60′s and 70′s was brought about by the rather sudden sexual revolution. For example, despite the pill, unwanted pregnancies actually increased – necessitating young women to politically campaign for the ‘right’ to have an abortion.
Most of this process isn’t fully conscious, and parts of it lead to vicious cycles. For example, the rush into education further increased the numbers of single young women in the free sexual market (and who were mixing with similar young men, further creating a loosening of sexual mores).
And I don’t think there’s actually much reasoning involved in feminism, apart from deceitful self-rationalisation.