Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights
The NYPD gleefully reported that the transactional value of the average female voter’s vagina in New York had risen slightly due to their heroic efforts in trapping Johns recently. The hard working pigs, posing as prostitutes, managed to successfully solicit and wreck the lives of 186 lonely men in just 4 days.
http://gothamist.com/2012/01/17/undercover_cops_pose_as_prostitutes.php
Elizabeth Bathory was a 16th Century Hungarian Countess and probably the most prolific serial killer and child murderer in history. She is believed to have sadistically tortured and killed over 600 young adolescent girls through pure sexual jealousy and malice. Obsessed with her fading looks, she would spend hours staring at herself in the mirror before picking out the prettiest of her retinue of young teenage maid servants to be hung up in a gibbot. She would proceed to jab at the poor girl with a sharp lance, causing her to slowly and painfully bleed to death. All the time whilst doing this, Elizabeth would scream furious obscenitites at the dying child.
Najat M’jid Maalla
– United Nations ‘Special Rapporteur on child abuse’Claimed in 2009 that there are over 4 million child porn websites worldwide that constitute a multi-billion dollar industry. An FBI expert recently stated that there were now less than a dozen commerical child porn sites in existence. While millions of children around the world still live in poverty, and thousands die every day from famine, disease and war, her UN feminist mandate is to jet around the world organizing conferences to wipe out the scourge of 17 year old ’children’ choosing to do what they want with their bodies on webcam.
Just another one of numerous examples where the facists can
‘knock-out’ numerous MALE ‘sex offenders’ and devastate their lives and the lives of their loved ones too, no doubt.
The sex-hysteria just keeps growing, day-by-day.
If they really wanted to ‘clean-up’ prostitution, they would do it easily, within a week or two by rounding up all of the prostitutes and subjecting them to the same harsh laws and penalties thay currently reserve exclusively for the ‘johns’ only.
However, we all know that prostitution is not the issue here. The true agenda is criminalizing or demonizing NORMAL male sexuality.
This method ensures that in a relatively short time, they will be able to effectively entrap THOUSANDS of ‘johns’ and destroy all of them.
I hope they continue with it, because eventually all of the families and friends of these so-called deviants or perverts are going to say: “ENOUGH”!
“My father (or brother, uncle, cousin, son or even friend) is NOT a deviant or a pervert”…
Eventually (I hope) they will all join forces and revolt against the current moral dictatorship that is now running America and the rest of (former) Western democracies and destroy them and their mindless witch-hunt!
Alan Vaughn
20 Jan 12 at 5:44 am
Interestingly, many women are against these laws too. Alas, these women do not hold political power.
Columnist
20 Jan 12 at 8:16 am
@Columnist
“Interestingly, many women are against these laws too. Alas, these women do not hold political power”.
Who said that ‘women’ were supporting this entrapment technique or that ‘women’ hold political power?
I’m sure that millions of women do not support these laws too, especially those providing their services to the ‘johns’.
This blog opposes FEMINISM and the criminalization of male sexuality, NOT women.
Most of us here actually adore women…
Alan Vaughn
20 Jan 12 at 9:15 am
Right, there is misunderstanding around since second wave than what feminists wants is what women in general want but if women claim not support this belief is because (according to feminists) they don’t what they are saying, so they put women in the same position of not knowing what they want until a feminist say so, like the mystical patriarchal.
MRA
21 Jan 12 at 12:35 am
Alan Vaughn wrote:
“I hope they continue with it, because eventually all of the families and friends of these so-called deviants or perverts are going to say: “ENOUGH”!
“My father (or brother, uncle, cousin, son or even friend) is NOT a deviant or a pervert”…”
Exactly – while the feminist-friendly media outlets refuse to cover any criticism of feminism from the male viewpoint (we’re all stupid rapists anyway), there are increasing numbers of women dissatisfied with where feminism is now going. In particular I have heard many mothers, sisters and second wives pointing out how unfair the property division rulings made by family law courts are. ‘Second wives’ are getting pissed off that the assets they thought they be soon getting are instead going to first wives. Mothers and sisters are simply angry at the sheer unfairness of the whole deal. Blood is thicker than water.
Current feminism needs enemies. There has to be a threat of some sort to justify there existence and government handouts and biased laws etc. As long as men don’t fight them directly, I think they will continue to make new enemies amongst those female ‘traitors’ who still have the temerity to appreciate men.
Deano
21 Jan 12 at 2:22 am
Columnist wrote:
“Interestingly, many women are against these laws too. Alas, these women do not hold political power.”
I’m guessing that you mean the types of women who value fairness and are happy to be women are generally not the sort to form political pressure groups and go protesting and badgering politicians endlessly. The nice women tend to stay away from rallies where they shriek through megaphones demanding that all men be castrated etc. As you say, it’s a pity that these women are ignored by the ones claiming to represent them.
As for those manginas who support militant feminism, well they’re a stain on my gender and must be scrubbed off with a wire brush and kerosene.
Deano
21 Jan 12 at 2:32 am
To be honest I’m not as optimistic about some underlying female ‘fairness’ that is being supressed by feminist harridans. I think there is a direct link between the vagina vote and the power of feminists and the non-stop legislation that is raping men.
That’s why Harriet Harman can stand up in the British parlimanet when the Conservatives are about to introduce a bill giving men accused of rape anonymity – remind David Cameron that if he upsets women voters he’ll be kicked out of office – and Cameron promptly ditches the bill the next day.
As far as the second wave is concerned I don’t think many feminists knew what they wanted or what was good for them, let alone the ordinary woman suddenly entering a ‘liberated’ free sex society.
theantifeminist
21 Jan 12 at 10:13 am
@Deano
“there are increasing numbers of women dissatisfied with where feminism is now going. In particular I have heard many mothers, sisters and second wives pointing out how unfair the property division rulings made by family law courts are. ‘Second wives’ are getting pissed off that the assets they thought they be soon getting are instead going to first wives. Mothers and sisters are simply angry at the sheer unfairness of the whole deal. Blood is thicker than water”…
Yeah, there’s also an increasing number of them, mainly in America and the UK that are VERY bitter about the labelling of their loved ones (male relatives) who are registered for life as paedophiles by way of the publicly accessible sex offender registries.
Often, their ‘crimes’ are incidents that I reckon EVERY living human being over the age of 12 yrs old has engaged in before attaining that age; like ‘playing doctor’ or other sexual experimentation with their peers – other kids. Now they have children as young as 4 yrs old registered for life as ‘sex offenders’. Or: boys that were 15 having fully consensual sex with their 14 yr old girlfriends, 16 or 17 yr old girls labelled (on sex offender registries) as paedophiles for possessing CP because they had photos of themselves topless or nude on their cell-phones; or female charges (i.e. school teachers) charged under paedophile laws for having sexual relationships with 16 year old boys, normally where the ‘children’ (boy students) under their care instigated the relationships.
I read of another case (see Inquistion21) where a bloke now in his 40′s was charged and spent (I think) 4 years in prison and registered for life on the public register for an ‘offence’ he committed against 3 boys all aged 11 years old…
So what you think?
This unfortunate individual was TWELVE (12) years old at the time he committed the ‘offences’…
The 11 year olds, now all aged in their 40′s too decided to complain 30 years later (because they all wanted a little cash bonus), so decided to destroy this man’s life because they wanted a bit of money.
Lawyers encourage this sort of behaviour because they make massive amounts of money out of it of course, but mainly because THEY CAN, thanks to the FEMINIST controlled states that introduced these DRACONIAN laws…
The problem with these public registers of sex offenders (in the eyes of the vigilanties that generally refer to them) is that everyone listed on them is a “pedo”, “lets get him” / her.
The families of the convicted individuals get harrassed, abused, assaulted and everything else that the actual ‘offenders’ have to suffer for the rest of their lives too and normally they have to suffer this constant abuse and ostricization while their ‘offender’ loved ones are still in prison (being beaten, arse-fucked etc., everyday of their hopeless existence).
Something’s got to give and the sooner the better, because if it continues the way it is, our whole society will just slip into a total police state of Totalitarinism, when EVERYONE will be at risk. Nobody will be safe from each other let alone from the thought police that will control us all.
Alan Vaughn
21 Jan 12 at 10:16 am
4 year old kids being placed on the paedophile register! Feeling safer now ladies?
It should logically follow that all baby boys born via the ‘old fashioned way’ be charged with raping their mothers and be sent straight to prison. “We make no apologies for protecting women from sex offenders”.
Deano
21 Jan 12 at 1:46 pm
Right Deano…
These also serve as good examples of how the PC (i.e. ‘equal rights’) dogma of the gynocracy has actually back-fired on them, where they claim their cause is about ‘protecting chilren and [victim] women’ is now atually CRIMINALIZING them as well, in the same way is was only supposed to criminalize men – ‘sex offenders’, DV etc…
Soon, many if not most women will notice this trend and they will react. Feminism will ultimately destroy itself by its hypocracy and simply: blatant stupidity, we hope.
Alan Vaughn
21 Jan 12 at 11:43 pm
No need for violence.
Only a bitchslap would do…
Anonymous
28 Jan 12 at 12:00 am
Mr. Vaughn. I’m getting exhausted trying to read all of it.
I’m getting dizzy and going to faint…
Please don’t tell me this is all true.
Anonymous
28 Jan 12 at 12:03 am
Ms Anonymous.
Yes, sadly it is.
Go to Inquistion2,1 it’s all accuraterly chronicled, complete with hyperlinks to all references used.
However, it probably won’t make you any wiser if you think my little summary is too exhaustive to read…
Inqusition21 has many pages explaining the dreadful state our society has now descended into.
You can deny it like most if you choose.
Alan Vaughn
28 Jan 12 at 7:03 am
Cannot really add much more to what you’ve all said, other than a more general comment about the whole witch-hunt:
Isn’t it strange or isn’t it ‘funny’ how it appears as though all of the mangina puppets, i.e. men like John Mann above and all of his male counterparts in Parliament, or Judges, Magistrates, Psychologists or other ‘Specialists’, Police Officers and their colleagues in Internet crime investigation services, who have the ‘pleasure’ of actually confronting and duly arresting and charging male ‘sex-offenders’ are all ‘IMMUNE’ to NORMAL male sexual function or sexual behaviour?
I.e. none of them apparently get erections when they view images of pornography (child or otherwise), all of them are indifferent to or unfazed at the sight of a mini-skirted or scantily clad 17 and a half year old HOT chick; none of them are tempted at all to succumb to flirtation or even direct attempts by young women to seduce them; all of them don’t and have NEVER masturbated, etc. etc…
These men must surely be Saints or true Angels? (Sarcasm).
Who or what allows these mere men to be so righteous and to judge us?
We all know that there have been many men from all of the above mentioned high-profile positions, that have been caught doing all of the above normal male sexually related activities, however I believe that there are many thousands more who have not been identified (publicly) or charged, because all of them are bound together in a sort of unholy ‘alliance’ and thus protect each other, at the expense of people like us: NORMAL, innocent, productive and law-abiding citizens.
Another factor too is that by their persecuting and scape-goating of others they believe (in a boyish way) that nobody would ever think they could be perverts or whatever, i.e:
“Look at me I couldn’t possibly be a pervert because I hate paedos – I am punishing them”, thinks a Magistrate or,
“I am responsible for finding them and arresting / charging them”, a Police Officer or Internet Crime Investigator childishly reassures himself…
When all of them, some at only a subconscious level, but most are fully aware that they too are equally as interested or enticed by all things sexual as the rest of us.
This victimization of ordinary mortals like us also serves to continuously bolster their over-inflated, but fragile egos.
Alan Vaughn
28 Jan 12 at 7:33 am
The women opposed to this kind of repression (prostitutes, strippers etc.) behave like many men. They think “glad it ain’t me” and get on with their life.
Many US citizens are more incredulous at legalised prostitution in countries such as Germany as they are at depenalised cannabis in Amsterdam. They equate legalised prostitution with something unimaginable like Wall-Mart’s selling little bags of cocaine. I’d like to know what men’s rights organisations in the US think of this. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out many MRAs actually support this war on prostitution. That’s why we’re getting nowhere. Feminists fight on on all fronts while MRAs only care about their own personal crusades (child custody etc.) and are blind to the interconnectedness of it all. In fact males are far better than females at practical tasks but not good at all at grasping subtle interrelated social issues that affect them indirectly.
Jack
29 Jan 12 at 4:24 pm
I think it is essential to work out the psychology of manginas like John Mann, because let’s face it, feminists can only succeed via the help of men like him.
There have been at least several cases of child porn ‘experts’ in the UK (male) having been found to have abused children themselves (usually boys).
You’ve probably also read about Kyle Payne here and elsewhere.
In the period after Roman Polanski had been arrested I watched a few Polanski videos on YouTube. The comments sections were full of calls for him to be hung, drawn, and quatered. I clicked on the profiles of quite a few of the most rabid male commentators. Around 1 in 3 (seriously) would have very disturbing videos in their favourite sections – pre pubescent girls, even toddlers, dancing and such like.
I remember reading that in 1930′s Germany, some of the most virulent and anti-semitic supporters of the Nazis were Jews themselves – often denying, at least publicly, that they were Jews.
And, of course, it’s accepted that the most bigoted homophobes are often closet homosexuals themselves.
Yet even though virtually all men throughout human history (as far as we know) have found young teenage girls sexually attractive, we’re supposed to believe these male Judges who describe other men as perverts and paedophiles as they sentence them for downloading pics of teens in bikinis, or groping a 15 year old slut.
theantifeminist
31 Jan 12 at 11:57 pm