TyphonBlue on Eivind Berge : (His) Sexual Frustration Must Be the ‘Processing of Overwhelming Sexual Trauma’!!

Our friend Eivind Berge alerted us to the following comments made by the increasingly popular ‘femRA’ TyphonBlue 2 or 3 years back, and I thought it deserved highlighting as a post in itself, just to illustrate what kind of cancer the Men’s Rights Movement is allowing itself to be infected with.

The comments were made nearly 3 years ago when Eivind was ‘INCEL’ (involuntarily celibate).  In response to another female commentator stating that Eivind was ‘fucking HOT’, TyphonBlue gave her own radical feminist take on Eivind’s sexual frustration :

IMHO it sounds like he’s processing (badly) some sort of overwhelming sexual trauma from his past. I’m not saying that disqualifies him from being hot, but likely off-limits for the duration.

http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2009/12/01/diversion-from-do-you-self-identify-%E2%80%A6-noh/#comment-103832

http://theantifeminist.com/paedohysteria-starts-to-eat-its-own-max-clifford-arrested-on-suspicion-of-sexual-offences/comment-page-1/#comment-39379

Now if, for example, the militant atheism movement was being accused of racism  for describing the Koran as a work of superstition, they might be tempted to embrace some dark skinned ‘apostates’ into their ranks – former Muslims who had renounced their previous faith and now fervently claimed that all religions are evil backward nonsense.  Atheists might even be tempted to give such apostates a high profile within their movement, perhaps more than they deserve by merit, truth be told, simply in order to deflect any accusations of racism against Muslims and possible links to White Nationalism or other ‘hate groups’ (through illustrating that Muslims are not a race but followers of a belief system, and it is only the belief system that atheists have a problem with).

But whatever you think about the Militant Atheism movement, you can be pretty sure that they would have sufficient critical faculties to be able to smell that something was up if any of those born again atheists curiously appeared to hold on to one or two of their former radical Islamist ideas – such as that homosexuals will burn in eternal fire.  Not only that, but if they held that the belief that homosexuals will burn in eternal fire should be a key assumption of atheism, and that atheists should raise money (including from Muslims) in order to devote more time to spreading the message that homosexuals will be condemned to eternal punishment (and that this promotes atheism and secularist ideals).

It appears that the men’s rights movement is a little different to the atheism movement.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Why would a femRA wish to validate the feminist child sex abuse industry and manufacture millions of fucked up male ‘victims’?  Apart from the obvious well documented (here) reason why a middle-aged woman would wish to deny any possible challenge (from the growing MRM) to the key Sexual Trade Union agenda of child abuse hysteria, the following words of Typhonblue herself may shed a little light on the subject :

In “Women Do Not Benefit: The Science,” I outlined how toxic victimhood limits women and socializes them to undermine their own achievements. Toxic victimhood promotes the perception that women are “acted upon” rather than actors. When a society is promoting toxic victimhood, there is no need to limit women overtly through legal, financial or social restrictions. Instead women will limit themselves through their own mental foot-binding.

23 Comments on "TyphonBlue on Eivind Berge : (His) Sexual Frustration Must Be the ‘Processing of Overwhelming Sexual Trauma’!!"


  1. That analogy with atheists and ex-Muslims sums it up awfully well and together with Typhon Blue’s earlier comments, also confirms fairly conclusively that the so-called men’s rights movement has the same suspicious relationship with feminists; especially when all those desperado white-knights such as those found commenting (and even managing and writing posts) on mRA blogs such as AVfM, worship the ground the skanky femRA walks on.

    I’d add that most femRAs are women who do not genuinely empathize with men and are ones who must never be trusted.
    They are effectively like termites to the MRM, slowly but surely, but very quietly and discreetly, eating their way through its foundations. Eventually, the entire structure (of the MRM) will just fall in a heap as it is absorbed into the surrounding earth of feminism..

    (I hope the term femRA will become another meme for this and similar minded blogs).


  2. You just can’t win with these people. If you have sex, then you are a victim whether you like it or not. If you don’t have sex and are unhappy about it, then that too proves you are a victim of sexual abuse and must be protected from sex. Every eventuality is covered and the explanation is always sexual abuse, which is always supported by the evidence, no matter what it is.

    This is logic reminiscent of attempts made by believers in the supernatural to prove psi, except it is even more convoluted and fallacious.

    Such is the feminist worldview, which is now unfortunately increasingly infecting the Manosphere too. Sexual abuse is the only explanation in their philosophy for every phenomenon, and the solution is always to expand the abuse industry.


  3. Paul Elam: “Fear not my boy, soon the worlds 15 or so hot teachers that want your body for their devilish pleasure will be safely locked up so they can do you no harm!”

    school boy: “I sure wish you MRAs would stop being so good to me.”


  4. when the women is the victim it is to keep the man from getting sex
    when the man is the victim it is to keep the man from getting sex

    spread the meme


  5. @evilwhitemalempire
    Goodness me, are there really as many as that? 15 hot teachers in the US? Surely Paul means the whole world?
    I’ll certainly be spreading the meme.
    LOL!


  6. HaHa, I was just thinking last night about how we hadn’t seen you for a while Evil White.


  7. What I haven’t figured out is why these mRAs think we NEED women in the movement in the first place.

    To expand on the analogy: suppose a girl commented here that she agreed with the STU theory and gave an account of how her life was shattered by AOC laws. We might give her some support; encourage her spread the word to other girls. But then what? She hasn’t told anything we don’t already know—what would be the purpose of splashing her photos all over the place and making her a co-editor of the blog? Is that supposed to change femihag minds?

    If these women really want to do something constructive, they should start an anti-feminist movement of their own and work on reforming their own gender. They don’t need to take over the MRM to do that, either.


  8. @theantifeminist
    I read in the article

    I’m certainly willing to listen to ideas on how to protect male spaces without making them completely hostile and alienating to women, but at this point, I can’t see any other solution to protecting male spaces.

    I agree and disagree: I agree with the latter part of the statement, but totally disagree with the first part…

    I’m certainly willing to listen to ideas on how to protect male spaces without making them completely hostile and alienating to women..

    That is so f***ing REDDIT. (Grrrr)!!
    These f***ing manginas are really pissing me off!
    We are NOT willing to listen to anything they have to say!
    F*** Them! Who cares? STOP giving into the privileged princesses!! They don’t give a rat’s arse seeing men go to prison for decades for looking at pictures, so why should we care about ‘hurting their feelings’, for f***’s sake?
    We DON’T NEED THEM at all. There is NO reason for allowing them into the MRM, anymore than there is any reason for us to join any feminist movement.

    The only good reason for a MRA to join them could possibly be in some ‘Trojan Horse’ role – as part of a plot to bring them down.
    I.e. the Trojan horse ‘Agent Orange’ who infiltrated RadFem-Hub last year.
    However, I think we would all agree that many men are essentially white-knights at heart and it would be a very risky experiment..! (Don’t try it).

    Likewise, any femRA claiming to be ‘joining’ or empathizing with the MRM, would almost certainly be there in a similar Trojan Horse capacity, (to feminists) as we’ve been seeing more and more, of late, especially over at Reddit’s manginasRights blog.

    We’re supposed to be a Men’s Rights Movement, what use could femRAs possibly be to us anyway??

    I’ll say it again to them one more time:
    We DON’T NEED YOU femRAs, thank you.
    Now go back to your normal feminist-friendly broodmare blogs where you’d be a lot more appreciated and useful.


  9. Alan:
    I think we need female-only spaces a lot worse: the kitchen, the laundry-room, and the nursery, specifically.

    And let’s make sure they STAY there this time!


  10. Jack:
    Thanks for that link, he’s absolutely right. To further expand on what he said, it is noticable that core issues are rarely discussed or even opposed by these femRAs.

    It’s conspiculously absent that femRAs ever speak about gender polarity, though they speak a lot about ‘equality.’ Feminism seeks to destroy gender polarity and substitute a feminocentric androgeny. The second thing missing is support for any move to create actual sexual competition: nothing about lowering AOC laws; repealing restrictions on foreign marriages; or legalizing porn or sexbots.

    More and more it appears that this is simply ‘Feminism with a Smiling Face.’


  11. Actually, if you kept reading the comments you would see that the whole post was sarcastic.


  12. Antifeminist:
    Do you get the feeling that Paul Elam may be reaching the ‘male expendability’ point? It looks like the neofeminists over there are starting to consider him a bit out of the mainstream…

    Speaking of Esmay: on his own blog (January 9th), he stated that he and several other femiservatives were working on a new MRA Manifesto. His collaborator is one ‘Wooly Bumblebee’. Click on the link below to see what another ‘lovely sheila’ looks like:

    http://www.youtube.com/user/truthandoblivion


  13. Actually, if you kept reading the comments you would see that the whole post was sarcastic.

    Well it’s piss poor sarcasm considering that what she is describing (satirically) is already the reality.


  14. @Eric,
    You know it just occurred to me after seeing that video, that maybe they accept these ‘sheilas’ as mRAs simply on their appearance rather than whatever slightly men positive principles they might advocate. When you open that link it’s almost like a game of ‘guess the female’… Three isn’t much difference between the 2 sheilas and the one man there…

    Oh and Clarence, typhonblue‘s post is written with a sort of humorous or even sarcastic writing ‘style’ or undertone but the basic message or theme of her anecdote is definitely NOT sarcasm.
    You could be right about the comments – it was sickening enough to read the post itself and I had to bail-out after quickly reading that, thus couldn’t be bothered with their (no doubt childish and yes: probably sarcastic) commentary.

    After earlier in the week vowing never to return, I only went to AVfm (m = manginas) purely out of curiosity to see whether or not the post was indeed sarcastic.


  15. @Columnist

    Does Saudi-Arabia need MRAs?

    Maybe they do, providing you don’t mean the current ‘mainstream’ ‘mRAs’ (m = manginas). Essentially: feminist co-opted white-knights who advocate things like ‘equal injustice for all’ and that men are actually as much victims of female ‘paedos’, as women are of the patriarchy.
    Such ‘mRAs’ would be about as helpful to Saudi men as what petrol (gasoline) would be to a fireman trying to extinguish a house fire…


  16. Alan:
    I’ve thought about that too. It could be that, as an experienced advocate on fathers rights and false accusations, Elam might be ‘hedging his bets’ so to speak, against any such allegations being made by the ‘sheilas’. So he picks grrrlz from whom nobody would take such an allegation seriously!

    This strategy might not work out in the end, anyway, because the male commenters there seem to be more desperate and sexually needy than anyone anticipated…oh well.

    And as a side note, even though Ms. Typhon admitted the article was sarcasm, the fact that so many of her star-struck male groupies took it seriously and jumped on the bandwagon shows she has quite a few of these guys wrapped around her fingers!


  17. @Eric

    And as a side note, even though Ms. Typhon admitted the article was sarcasm, the fact that so many of her star-struck male groupies took it seriously and jumped on the bandwagon shows she has quite a few of these guys wrapped around her fingers!

    Yep, they’ll never be MRAs while they’re all busy jumping over each other, trying to impress those femihags and skanky, trailer-park-trash class femRAs.
    They must try and dump the white-knight within them, but as you’ve just pointed out, they’ll never be able to do that while they’re still as sexually deprived, thus as desperate for it as they are.

    I think those mRAs are using forums like AVfm as a sort of social club, where they hope that something like a ‘meet-up’ with their favorite femRA skank or lesbian, might someday eventuate…


  18. Alan:
    I would bet that Fraudtrelle’s groupies (at least among themselves) are laughing themselves sick over these mRAs gushing over the ‘lovely sheilas’. Granted, Manboobz’ groupies are likely not beauty-queens themselves; but they can’t possibly be getting TOO jealous over their competition!


  19. @Eric

    … Granted, Manboobz’ groupies are likely not beauty-queens themselves; but they can’t possibly be getting TOO jealous over their competition!

    Their competition? More likely their allies or partners in crime. Those femRAs could even be manboobz groupies for all those desperate and depraved mRAs at AVfm know (or even care).
    One could surely be forgiven for thinking they might be ‘manboobers’, after reading some of their clearly feminist inspired commentary, which of course is strongly supported by the rest of the manginas and confirmed by the number of (mandatory and white-knight necessitated) upvotes, those lovely sheila’s comments are invariably awarded.

Comments are closed.