Coming across the following ‘brave’ piece of writing, just made me realise how hopeless the situation has almost become for male sexuality, and for ever mounting anything more than token resistance to the femi-hags who are waging war upon it.
Among the male of the human species ephebophilia is perhaps the natural state. Perhaps not quite as far as a specific preference for but certainly the way The Good Lord* made us all those girls who have just recently matured to fertility are the very definition of sexually attractive.
And it does seem that Savile was an ephebophile. Possibly on the verges of hebephilia but not, in that strict usage, a paedophile.
The truth is, ephebophilia in human males is normal even if societally repugnant.
Yes, I know you can say the same thing about murder: the murder rates of hunter gatherer societies make that one of the leading causes of death among males. Normal and societally repugnant. But it is still true, male attraction to teenage lovelies is simply normal.
Pat yourself on the back why don’t you Mister? – for saying what every man on the planet knows is true? No, I really don’t think so.
Maybe I’m being a little harsh, and he is using his real identity, so to speak even the obvious like this is indeed brave I suppose. But it’s more his comparison of ‘ephebophilia’ with ‘murder’, as a ‘get out of jail card’, as well as some of the comments below the article by castrated manginas that has inflamed me somewhat.
We should all be aware of the naturalistic fallacy, and I’ve never said that the obvious factual truth that EVERY man who isn’t a pervert is sexually attracted to teenagers from 13-19 leads necessarily to the moral judgement, for example, that the age of consent should be 13. However, I’ve also asked the question here many times that if the claim that teenagers having sex with older men is ‘abuse’ was based upon clear and rational argument, instead of sexual prejudice, jealousy, and superstitious puritanism, then the makers of such claims would not have to pretend that the older ‘abusers’ of young girls are ‘paedophiles’ or ‘perverts’.
Anything that is normal and natural should only be criminalized and demonized if there are very clear and obvious (good) reasons for doing so. And feminists have criminalized and demonized not merely consensual sex between teenagers and ‘adults’ but any expression of attraction whatsoever, from glancing at a 15 year old girl in the street with her boobs and arse cheeks hanging out on display, to giving the state the power to break into your home in the middle of the night to take you away for simply looking at pictures of 17 year old girls in bikinis.
The supporters of tolerance for homosexuality (of which, of course, I am one) often point to the sexual habits of penguins and other animals to prove that homosexuality is ‘natural’ and any ethical position against it irrational. Yet many or most of these sexually tolerant ‘liberal progressives’ will have no qualms in describing the attraction to youth as ‘paedophilia’ or ‘perversion’ – something that is leading to ordinary men being dehumanized to the point where comparisons with the status of the Jews in Nazi Germany are becoming more and more apt on a daily basis.
Yes, there is also a (different) sense in which murder is ‘natural’, but the analogy is stunningly stupid because ‘ephebophilia’ is deemed criminal largely because of the lie that it is ‘unnatural’ and hence ‘inapropriate’ etc.
Sexual jealousy from older women towards young nubile girls is also perfectly natural and probably incurable, as is the resulting desire from older women with political and economic power to abuse their strength by restricting the sexual competition to themselves from younger females through legislation and shaming. But in this case, what is natural is harmful, and such women (feminists) should be punished by the law, or at least placed in secure psychiatric units and forced to receive counselling for extreme and harmful sexual jealousy and the resulting desire to abuse and manipulate young people (as should the mangina paedocrites who support them).
For as I have also stated here many times, the social and moral belief, codified into feminist law, that sex with teenagers is wrong and criminal, and that a high age of consent protects young girls rather than older women, is not ‘outcome neutral’ if mistaken, in the way for example, are laws requiring children to be fastened into seat belts whilst travelling in cars. In the latter case the belief that laws on seatbelts protect children results only in minor inconvenience, and does no harm to the child or to adults, if the belief is mistaken, and the reasons for the law groundless. Age of consent laws, however, together with accompanying child abuse hysteria, are not ‘harmless’. Apart from destroying the life of the adult, they also demonstrably harm the ‘child’ who is 1/ denied sexual autonomy 2/ forced to accept the damaging label of ‘child abuse victim’ 3/ often forced to testify against a man she may (still) love, and see him be sent to prison and beaten and raped as a result. (there are also many secondary harmful effects of paedohysteria and age of consent laws – such as inevitable intergenerational apartheid, lack of male teachers, demonisation and suspicion against men in general etc).
Of course, a high age of consent, and social and moral hysteria over ‘child abuse’ might still be justified if the harm to children that is avoided by the supposed protection afforded by these laws and attitudes outweighs the demonstrable harms listed above.
But – God forbid – if feminist age of consent laws and paedohysteria are based upon nothing more than sexual jealousy, prejudice, and lies , then it is a form of child abuse – amongst the worse we can possibly imagine. Especially so since the adults (largely feminists and femiservatives) responsible profit directly from this harm – psychologically, sexually, and financially.
 the age of consent was originally raised from 13 to 16 in the UK by suffragettes who believed sex outside marriage to be sinful, as well as the result of tabloid generated hysteria over ‘white slavery’ fabrications. At this time girls also began puberty 3 or 4 years later then they do today.
If a man tells a women to stop dressing like a ‘slut’, in order to lessen the chances of herself being raped or assaulted, then protests involving tens of thousands of women spring up across the world within weeks – women outraged that men are telling them what they can and can’t do with their bodies. Yet women ae free not only to tell men what they can and can’t do with their eyes, they can legislate and define and abuse language itself in order to control men’s minds and very essences as men and male sexual human beings. And not only are there no protests from men against their female oppressors, but men will actually be more inclined in their millions to beat and kill their fellow brothers, even to lynch the remains of dead men resting in their graves – all at the command and behest of feminists.
But the worst ignominy of all is that there will only be one or two lone ‘fringe’ members of the ‘men’s rights movement’ who will dare to speak up and state the obvious, or even discuss issues like this. And to do so will risk bringing the wrath of other ‘MRAs’ to bear upon themselves…even though the very first men’s rights activist – Ernest Belfort Bax – himself clearly stated on several occasions that the feminist raising of the age of consent was legislation AGAINST MEN (and at the heart of both feminism and the suffrage movement).
Just as ‘sluts’ do not deserve to be raped for what they wear, men do not deserve to be dehumanized and criminalized, and ultimately raped in a prison cell, for simply being men.
This is men’s rights.
The current descent of British society into a state of hysteria, savagery, and ignorance – on a level that even inbred medieval peasants would likely look down upon – is something difficult for a man’s mental health to withstand. I’ll probably be taking a break from this site and lose myself in a good book or two for a couple of weeks, although I will briefly check the comments and spam folder every day. Please continue to post links to news stories and articles below this or the relevant post.