The great anti-feminist Angry Harry has spoken often of his belief in the power of the internet to expose, and bring to account, the corrupt power hunger elites that are deceiving the masses for their own ends.
Maybe that’s so.
But it’s also the case that the internet is giving unprecedented power to the increasingly dumbed down mob, who are free to dispense vigilante ‘justice’ on to any individuals who fall foul of their primitive moral sensibilites (and allowed, and often encouraged and manipulated to do so, by powerful vested interest groups).
Recently we witnessed this with the re-visiting of the historical cases of Roman Polanski and Jon Venables (a British man who had killed a younger child when he was a 10 year old boy). These were in effect modern day public lynchings, performed largely via the technology of the internet, on people whose crimes, or alleged crimes, were committed decades ago. And at least these people did, or were accused of doing unspeakably bad things (although Jon Venables was little more than a toddler himself and the Polanski affair, dating from a particularly anarchic period of the early free sexual market, was never a black and white moral case of ‘drugging and raping an innocent child’).
But what I’ve witnessed today takes this to a whole new level and has shaken my last vestiges of faith, respect, and hope for humanity. What I’ve witnessed today is the first Western ’civilised’ equivalent of a girl being stoned to death.
And the girl is only 11 years old.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/technology/7931577/viral-video-girl-under-police-protection
It seems that the pretty if rather foolish young girl, using the monikers ‘jessi slaughter’ and ‘kerligirl13′, participated in video chatrooms where she attracted the ire of the Sistaria dress code police, as well as pedocrites, for apparently wearing low cut tops that revealed her bra strap. The spite and the ‘slut’ name calling continued until the girl posted a video on YouTube of herself making a tirade against her tormentors that was littered with bad language and childish threats (she is a fucking 11 year old for christ’s sake).
That was the worst mistake that young Jessica ever made. In what has quickly become the most extreme case ever of online bullying, one of her social networking accounts was hacked into and her home address and telephone number published on a notorious alternative internet forum. Within hours, she was recieving dozens of phone calls, including death threats, as well as a fake phone call from a ‘police officer’.
Jessica posted another video on YouTube of herself in tears pleading for her tormentors to stop. Unfortunately, her father makes an appearance, rather inarticulately threatening her bullies with legal action, something that’s only poured more fuel onto their spiteful fire. That video has quickly gone viral and already spawned hundreds of vicious parodies, most often made by adult women, invariably ugly and in their late teens and early twenties. The girl and her family are now under armed police protection.
Perhaps you are thinking ‘how does this story relate to anti-feminism?’. Perhaps, or even probably, if you have reached this site via Googling for ‘anti-feminism’, you might be thinking the little whore is deserving everything she is getting.
Well, if that’s the case, I wish a thousand plagues upon your home. It disturbs me to think I share DNA with you, let alone a political identity. Even the most barbaric shit-hole Islamic countries under Sharia Law do not do this to 11 year old kids, and if they do, they certainly do not simultaneously pretend to be a society that has child protection as its number one priority.
I oppose feminism on the grounds that it hijacks and degrades both civilisation and morality as nothing more than a vehicle for the selfish simian reproductive interests of one particular group in society (middle-aged women). Feminism, ostensibly about ending the ‘objectification’ of women as reproductive mechanisms, simply serves as an elevation of their own brood mare interests as all that is valuable and ethical in life. This is why they care nothing for stopping websites that make money from videos of young children being bullied, and yet criminilize half the male population of the world who search for porn (and inevitably at some point click on an illegal picture of a cartoon ’17 year old’ smiling in a bikini). This is why they have allowed a high-tech civilized secular society to morally regress to the point where an 11 year old girl can have her life destroyed for showing a bra-strap.
And in this, conservatives (including ‘anti-feminist conservatives’) have been the sexual trade union’s most useful idiot allies.
Ordinarily I’d agree.
However.
Rules of internet:
1. You do not step up to Anonymous unless you can handle what happens next.
2. You DO NOT step up to Anonymous unless you can handle what happens next.
This girl stepped up to Anonymous.
She could not handle what happened next.
Armed police protection is absolutely ridiculous, and an overreaction on the part of the authorities. Not indicative of what Anon can/will actually do.
Schoppy, I think you might find this interesting:
The strength with which the patrist outlook persists in police and legal circles may also be noted in the way in which laws, originally intended for some other purpose, are invoked to punish sexual offences. A few days before I wrote these lines, actions were brought under the Aliens Order against two unmarried women (not aliens) who had spent the night at an hotel with two American soldiers, registering as married women: they were committed to prison. A few days later, a firm which had allowed a boy to carry naphtha in open buckets, which led to an explosion in which he was killed, was fined £10. It would seem that the attitude of mind which, in the Middle Ages, regarded fornication as a more serious crime than manslaughter, still finds echoes today.
From Sex in History by Gordon Rattray Taylor.
P.S. Snark, mate if you’re listening; why did you cancel all the content from your site? I wanted to review it all but I can’t because it’s all gone! Please bring it back online.
@RR thanks, that excerpt is interesting and I’m going to try to get hold of the book.