That Rare Thing – A Pro Male Sexuality Anti-Feminist Blog
(see also : David Futrelle and the Advocacy of Child Murder)
When I posted my hopes for 2012 a few days ago, I forgot to mention that one of my hopes was that more men’s rights blogs would start appearing that placed the feminist war upon male sexuality at the center of their perspective. At the moment it still feels pretty lonely being a men’s rights activist speaking out unreservedly against ALL sexually self-interested feminist laws that criminalise male sexuality. But the same day I came across the following excellent blog from a Norwegian MRA called Eivind Berge (he posts under his real name) that you should all bookmark :
http://eivindberge.blogspot.com/
You might not agree with everything he says, as I’m sure not many of you agree with everything I say here. For example, his latest post is actually an attack on feminist laws that criminalise female teachers who end up sleeping with their male students. I don’t agree with the idea that there are less moral issues involved in female teachers sleeping with teenage boys than the other way around (in fact there are arguments to the contrary – for example that boys mature later than girls). But I do agree that it’s an absurdity that such ‘lucky’ boys are being damaged by having the child abuse victim label forced upon them, and I think that the way forward for MRAs is to highlight the double standards whilst taking care not to victimise boys ourselves in the name of ‘equality’.
Here’s a paragraph from another post entitlted : ‘The Trafficking Trade Groweth‘
Suppose you hire an au pair while making it clear that she is expected to provide sex as part of the deal, which the woman accepts. A perfectly fair exchange, right? I would naturally expect sex from an au pair myself or I wouldn’t hire her, and if she agrees, no reasonable person could object. Unfortunately, we live in a sick society with unbridled feminist power. In the feminist police state of Norway, this is now criminalized as “trafficking.” A man and his wife are now on trial for this exact scenario, and it really makes my blood boil with renewed hatred. Just when you thought we had reached the high-water mark, feminism keeps escalating and inventing new ways of persecuting male sexuality. The feminist police state is on a relentless march towards criminalizing ever greater areas of male sexuality — or in this case, applying existing laws in innovative ways in order to imprison more men. To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists.
Do not recommend getting into bed with Arpagus.
gwallan
4 Jan 12 at 12:13 pm
Well I see that he has come out with some extremely controversial sound bites that I wouldn’t necessarily want to be associated with, and I studied your spat with him on the-Spearhead this morning with interest. At the end of the day, he’s brave enough to be both 1/ a public anti-feminist and 2/ consistant and honest enough to realise that if you can attack feminist rape laws as a men’s rights issue, then you can clearly question feminist statutory rape laws in a like manner.
theantifeminist
4 Jan 12 at 2:30 pm
I can assure you that direction will allow feminists MORE control. In my part of the world we are gradually ridding the major sexual assault network of almost all feminist influence. Bit of work to go yet but it’s mainly micro stuff which I and others have well in hand.
Merely because somebody attacks feminists doesn’t automatically make them right. Arpagus has absolutely no understanding of the developmental distortions kids can experience in those circumstances. Neither do feminists! Both sides are wrong. Both sides massively overstate their case.
Those of us who CAN actually do something will continue to do so. This will be done WITHIN the lions den in spite of the ignorants throwing rocks from the outside.
gwallan
5 Jan 12 at 1:14 am
Great blog. Courageous guy. I am afraid he might face consequences. Certainly he will never get a teaching job anywhere in Norway. Or elsewhere in the world
I actually tend to agree with his opinions about 16 year old boys not being helpless victims, scarred for life when being “abused” by a hot female teacher. Though I understand that by feminist logic they should be punished at least as hard as men.
I liked the evolutionary argument he made to support his claim. Female sexuality is a scarce and expensive resource. It is like a bank being convicted for non-consensually giving money to a minor.
Of course, I believe, and I think we three all agree, that men should not be punished either for consensual sex with post-pubescent “victims”.
Human-Stupidity.com
7 Jan 12 at 9:27 am
I read Eivind Berge’s ENTIRE blog this morning and although I agree in principle with most of his views and like the three of you: also admire the man’s courage, I feel he spoils it by his obvious self-loathing.
The man should be very proud of himself for being such an articulate writer with a teriffic command of English (English is not his native language) and overall communication skills, yet he effectively dims what could be a powerful spotlight that could brightly illuminate the MRA movement and the ferminist scandal for the entire western world to see, by portraying himself as a ‘loser’ (his own words) or self-loathing desperado.
I was wide-eyed in disbelief when a read an exchange between him and an ‘anonymous’ commenter who was trying to advise him to go to Thailand and pay for sex and he dismissed the notion, pointing out that it is illegal for Norwegian men to hire prostitutes even in other countries!
Fuck, this bloke is only 32 years old, good-looking and has all the physical attrbutes that many women would only dream of!
The anonymous commenter was wrong, I’ve worked and lived in three S.E Asian countries over the past seven years and I’ve fucked more girls over that time (all under 25) than I did over the other 46 years of my life (I am now 53 years old and not very good looking to boot), but I have NEVER hired a prostitute in any of those countries. All I did (and still do when I get a chance) is smile at these girls and talk nice to them and within a few minutes, they were mine. Eventually however, I ended up marrying one of them and have already acquired a young family, which I’m very happy about.
Anyway I digress…
If he could only leave his personal issues and hatred out of his narratives, many (potential MRA’s) might actually take him seriously and even ‘follow’ him – he’s a potential Jesus to the MRA movement: a legend in his own right!
Alan Vaughn
17 Jan 12 at 4:16 am
I agree with your analysis Alan.
Leaving aside the fact that many MRAs simply won’t take him seriously, but there’s also the danger of confirming a view that MRAs are all losers who can’t gaid laid. (BTW, I thought his most recent article – http://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2012/01/which-men-does-mra-serve-alphas-or.html – was excellent).
There’s nothing that irritates me more than feminists being given full reign to lable the men’s rights movement as the ‘men can’t get laid’ movement, when we all know here that feminism is 100% about unattractive women fighting for their ‘rights’ in a free sexual market they can’t compete in.
I get comments left here by feminists and manginas all the time putting my ‘misogny’ down to ‘not being able to get laid’. I’m not a mra because I can’t get laid, it’s more to do with the fact that I can’t get laid with premium nubile teenage pussy (which I could, even past 40) without breaking feminist laws. Hell I can barely even think about ripe 16 year old perfection without breaking some femi-nazi thought crime law.
Eivind is a good looking bloke and still young – I doubt if he even needs to go abroad. If he just made some modifications to his personal appearence (for example, shaving his remaing hair off completely or wearing a stylish beano or other headwear), worked out a little to give himself bigger shoulders and the like, he could be a (premium) pussy magnet. Together with some self-confidence and a run through of basic PUA skills, he’d have little problem getting girls into bed, from 16 to whatever.
BTW Alan, don’t know if you and Deano have seen this : an Australian mother spends just 1 year in prison for filming herself raping her own 11 year old daughter – http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/story/2012/01/10/a-mothers-betrayal-abuse-daughter-sex-court/
theantifeminist
17 Jan 12 at 9:31 am
I didn’t see that particular report, but did hear the same thing on the radio news the other day.
I wonder if instead of her mother, her step-father had committed the same act: how many decades in prison he would have been sentenced to, especially since it involved the making of, possession of and distribution of child-pornography as well?
Another one let off scott free by the corrupt feminist / mangina ruled system.
They always make excuses or look for mitigation whenever the perpetrators of these crimes are women, but for men, there are no mitgating circumstances or excuses – MINIMUM 15 years for something like that – NO parole and absolutely no sympathy from the community either.
I also like the final comment by this mangina of a judge about the likelihood of her (not) re-offending…
How the fuck could he possibly know that?
It makes me sick to the core.
Alan Vaughn
17 Jan 12 at 1:08 pm
@theantifeminst
Have you seen this one?
http://www.reformsexoffenderlaws.org/index.php
I read a few posts there and I had to stop – I was literally crying…
Alan Vaughn
18 Jan 12 at 9:43 am
I think I’ve seen that one before and must have forgotten to add it to my blogroll. I’ll take a good look at it in a few days because I’ve been feeling under the weather and have been trying to avoid reading about the latest femiwhore shenanigans.
theantifeminist
19 Jan 12 at 8:44 pm
Yeah, good idea – you’ll be feeling under weather something akin to hurricane if you go there now.
Hope you’ll be back on track soon.
BTW I found that stuff some indirectly, but most directly via Inquistion 21st Century’s (mind blowing) site.
Alan Vaughn
20 Jan 12 at 1:10 am
If Eivind Berge has the balls to post under his REAL name, why don’t any of you?
I’m relatively new to the MRA community. As a matter of fact, this is my first public post on the subject. I may contribute more in the future.
As it is, I’ve come across this site in my research of a related subject.
What I’m wondering is whether any of you know if there are any countries in the world (even if they are 3rd world countries) which might sponsor or accept male immigrants or refugees, under a claim of gender-based persecution, if the men wanted to “escape” a typical, modern, Western “femi-nazi” regime? Do any of you know of any cases of such? Any pointer in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
Darek Czernewcan
21 Jan 12 at 12:18 am
I would say the Philippines would welcome you, have you tried?
I have lived there and worked there and married a local. So far I haven’t seen any signs of femi-nazism…
Depending on which country you’re from (there’s about 30 countries) that visitors only require a valid passport to enter and recently (I think in effort to boost tourism) the holders of passports from any of the 30 countries are given a tourism visa that allows them to stay up to 12 months. (It used to be 21 days). You can easily extend it for longer, by either paying a small fee to have it extended a few more months (but that method does involve a bit of paper work and BS), or the easiest way is simply fly to Hong Kong, stay there overnight (in the airport transit area – it’s HUGE, so you’ll be able to stay there) then re-enter the next day to get another 12 month stay.
If you want to live there permanently, just find some young hottie and marry her, obtaining citizenship there is a breeze.
I wouldn’t worry about the refugee / immigrant stuff, just go there and enjoy your new life of freedom!
Also: what makes you so sure that none of us are posting using our real names??
Alan Vaughn
23 Feb 12 at 6:02 am
Iran could accept you as a refugee and make a showcase out of it. Otherwise remember that refugee status is defined by the United Nations (the same Organisation that defined a child as anyone under 18 – or is it 21?).
jack
23 Feb 12 at 7:05 am
Very true Jack. Feminism has its tentacles just about everywhere now – aside from a few Islamic states. I don’t know any country (aside from Iran perhaps, as you say) who would dare upset feminists/the West, by granting refugee status on this basis.
Also, the worst way that feminism is persecuting men (from the perspective of this blog) is through the non stop barrage of laws that criminilise and restrict male sexuality. As far as I know, every country in the Western world now has ‘sex tourism’ laws, which means that the state you happened to be born in, or whose flag is on your passport, effectively owns your penis.
If you truly want to escape the feminist state you effectively belong to, you should research some countries that have a short naturalisation period for citizenship. From what I’ve read, Argentina has only a 2 year residency requirement before you can apply for full citizenship. There are also some small island nations in the Carribean where you can apparently buy citizenship if you have the money to do so – sometimes there are economic investment requirements.
Simply put, there is no remotely sexually tolerant place on Earth anymore where feminists aren’t organising themselves and lobbying to preserve the market value of their aging pussies. South America is now experiencing a glut of female presidents, and also suffers from the same inter-governmental sexual trade union lobbying as does Europe with the EU.
You’d probably be happier in a place like the Philipines as Alan said, but I recall a story I posted here recently in which the Swedish owners of an adult webcam site there were given truly barbaric sentences (I think life) – and remember that prison in these places can be a lot harder even than in America.
theantifeminist
23 Feb 12 at 8:24 am
And as for your (Darek Czernewcan) stupid comment about not having the balls to use real names – I think I’ve got balls enough to run a blog that takes the sexual trade union head on over all issues, including paedohysteria, and that gets over 1,000 visitors daily.
We need public mens’ rights activists, and we also need anonymous MRAs, who are willing to say things and take things a bit further than being public would allow.
I respect Eivind Berge and his decision to be public – he’s got the courage and evidently the circumstances to be able to continue to speak as forthrightly as he would as an anonymous blogger. Unfortunately, I live in the UK currently, the home of paedohysteria, and if I was public I would likely have bricks through my window within a few weeks.
theantifeminist
23 Feb 12 at 8:30 am
Unfortunately, I live in the UK currently, the home of paedohysteria, and if I was public I would likely have bricks through my window within a few weeks.
More likely within a few hours!
Alan Vaughn
23 Feb 12 at 10:11 am
My apologies. I meant to say “many of you” instead of “all of you”.
Thank you for the ideas. About the Iran thing… Has anyone ever actually done it? I’m looking for a precedent of a male gender refugee.
Darek Czernewcan
11 May 12 at 12:27 am
Gentlemen, there are more important things in life than sex. Do you not realize that by being so powerfully motivated by the procurement of sex, YOU give women all that power over yourselves. You have nobody but yourselves to blame for the current state of sexual politics. Do any of you have any idea what it might feel like to refuse the possibility of a sexual encounter with a woman whom you actually may find quite sexually attractive? I’m guessing that many of you don’t. Many of you are like dogs who will hump anything that makes itself available to you. When you stop thinking with your dicks, gentlemen, the world will stop thinking of you as dicks.
Darek Czernewcan
11 May 12 at 12:40 am
@theantifeminist
How did this feminist or mangina or whatever troll it is slip through the net?
Alan Vaughn
11 May 12 at 1:10 am
Ah, indeed. I apologize for interrupting your mutual masturbation circle. You’re obviously not here to discuss the issues, but rather to stroke each others wounded egos. Go ahead now, keep stroking…
And once again… somebody presents a view that differs from your own, and the first thing you reach for is this petty name-calling? Son, when you get past being a little boy, you may ask my permission to walk and speak among MEN.
Darek Czernewcan
11 May 12 at 1:46 am
I’m just curious. Were you by chance sick the day they explained the difference between a penis and a brain in grade 7 biology class?
Darek Czernewcan
11 May 12 at 1:49 am
The only one doing any naming and shaming here is you.
LOL….
Alan Vaughn
11 May 12 at 2:16 am
Darek Czernewcan is among the directors of a children’s center. Google for his name on this site: http://donate2charities.ca/fr/0_119032522RR0001._.MARATHON_CHILDREN_AND_FAMILY_CENTRE_%5B5565630000%5D
jack
11 May 12 at 5:23 am
Do any of you have any idea what it might feel like to refuse the possibility of a sexual encounter with a woman whom you actually may find quite sexually attractive?
********************
you mean what it feels like to be ass raped in prison ’cause some bitch accused you of rape just because YOU turned HER down?
hopefully never
evilwhitemalempire
11 May 12 at 5:48 am
When you stop thinking with your dicks, gentlemen, the world will stop thinking of you as dicks.
**********************************
and when you start thinking the world will stop thinking of YOU as a dick
evilwhitemalempire
11 May 12 at 5:52 am
To answer a couple of this freak’s ‘points’ :
I deliberately focus almsost entirely on male sexuality – hence the tag of this blog ‘resisiting the rape of the male’, because very few other men’s rights sites do. It’s also primarily a theory of what feminism is and always has been, and that is a sexual trade union for ordinary women in the face of technological progress which weakens their sexual power over men. I have no intention of ever getting married, I’ll do my very best to avoid ever having children – like an ever growing percentage of the male population, in particular those men fully aware of the traps waiting for them in pursuing either of those options. I haven’t much to add to the father’s rights issues which are given primacy on 95% of MRA sites, so it would be pointless me mentioning them at any length.
This site is not about ‘old men fucking 12 year old girls’, it’s about the feminist state destroying basic liberties and rights of millions of men, as well as damaging society and destroying healthy interactions between generations. These issues have been (courageously) higlighted by mainstream publications as diverse as the Economist magazine to the Spectator, and from public figures ranging from Richard Dawkins (I know you won’t like that one) to Boris Johnson – the mayor of London. It’s a complete act of dishonesty and betrayal for any men’s rights activist (read father’s rights activist) to pretend that these issues aren’t central to the men’s rights movement.
If this blog is transparently nothing to do with men’s rights and just for ‘dirty old men’, then why do some of the most prominant men’s rights activists (such as Angry Harry, the father of modern men’s rights) link here?
Darek Czernewcan is only person trying to shame people here with lies and misrepresentations and childish name calling. Unfortunately, because I talk about sexuality here a lot, and because my site enjoys a high page rank, I do get a lot of visitors arriving here through Googling such terms as ’40 year old man fucks xx year old girl’ etc. I’ll have to go through my logs to see if that has been the case with you, as you’re clearly not a men’s rights supporter, I don’t know how else you would have found this site.
Now stop thinking with a vagina Darek Czernewcan and realise that sex is just fun, a natural human activity and nothing to put at the center of your puritan paedocrite moral universe. Even monkeys don’t reify fucking and a female’s vagina like conservative creeps like you do.
theantifeminist
11 May 12 at 6:54 am
AF,
I thought this small-minded and clearly indoctrinated, radical conservative might actually be a feminist using a man’s name and trying to give any reader the impression that the transcript is of a ‘normal’ man naming and shaming a small group of antifeminist dissenters, to glorify herself at Jezebel or similar misandrist institution.
However, I think your analysis would be more likely, indeed the views and musings a text-book Paedocrite…
Alan Vaughn
11 May 12 at 8:20 am
Yes, that was the only reason I called Darek Czernewcan stupid – and it is stupid, and he’s a perfect example of why it’s probably beyond brave (at least in the UK) to use real names when discussing these issues. You get paedocrites like him and David Futrelle misrepresenting what we are discussing here.
I don’t think I had any problem with the rest of the comement by Darek Czernewcan, although I am of the opinion that there isn’t really anywhere on the planet you can escape from the feminist bags anymore – and if you do find a place, it will only be temporary, because if it is any kind of refuge, you can be sure that the sexual trade union will have that country on the top of their list to interfere in next.
theantifeminist
12 May 12 at 6:32 am
It’s up to individuals whether or not they use their real names. If using your real names doesn’t force you to temper or modify what you would otherwise be willing to say and argue, then go ahead. I don’t think any of us have anything to hide, and I couldn’t care less anyway – I’m only interested in arguments and what people have to say.
theantifeminist
12 May 12 at 6:40 am
As a beginning to this discussion I will explain that I won’t use the term feminist as it is not correct. It is a hijacked word used out of context but much more socially or emotionally acceptable than gynocentrist or female chauvinist. The latter has serious negative social connotations. No man or woman with social conscience would want to align them-self to a chauvinist no matter which sex as chauvinists are recognised for their desire to control, belittle, and subjugate others. Perhaps a mere step along the path to human slavery. Chauvinism demands the removal of personal rights of the oppressed and creation of mechanisms which limit the airing of a social voice. The word feminist is a modern linguistic prescription of how to act as a woman that has emanated from educational circles. It is used to build allegiances with an emotionally driven mass audience. I think we need to call a spade a spade in a real social debate and call them what they actually are: female chauvinists. I believe if you want to maintain male rights you need to look at the strategies used by female chauvinists and vie for male rights in creative ways ie politics and mass social voice. Female chauvinism is a socio-political outcome. It is of no sense demonising the outcome as that changes nothing as the mechanisms to achieve it are still in place..
Darek Czernewcan shaming is not a debate stimulating mechanism. Men’s rights activists recognise shaming is a tactic used in the gynocentrist female chauvinist debate where rationale discourse can not be maintained. Why do problems exist with being able to maintain the debate? The answer is possibly very simple. They don’t own the debate they have adopted it. Their answers don’t come from within only what they have been conditioned to believe. Hence power ploys are used to stay in control of the debate. It is purely a parent-child communication transaction designed to slam the door on all discussion. Use shaming on sites like this and you will be labeled a male gynocentrist or a woman pretending to be a man. I have added a little quote below.
“Shaming tactics. This phrase is familiar to many Men’s Rights Activists. It conjures up the histrionic behavior of female detractors who refuse to argue their points with logic. Yet women are not the only ones guilty of using shaming tactics against men. Male gynocentrists use them, too.
Shaming tactics are emotional devices meant to play on a man’s insecurities and shut down debate. They are meant to elicit sympathy for women and to demonize men. Most, if not all, shaming tactics are basically ad homimem attacks. ”
(ad homimem attacks: a basic attack on an opponents character instead of a discussion of the issues or contentions on hand. Used in law courts since the 15th century and still strongly utilised in modern courts)
Yes guys we have percies, willies, john thomases, dicks, cocks, schlongs, weapons, trouser snakes, what ever you want to call it. I discovered mine as an infant and will keep checking it is there until the day I die. But real discussion against female chauvinism has to move away from an innate DNA driven fixation with it. It is that very fixation with sex that female chauvinists have used as a weapon against men. They have convinced their audience that it is dominant trait for all males and with it follows the desire to have power over all women and women will be subjugated for this purpose. They rely on women being misinformed and controlling the minds of the people they are proposing to be helping. Female chauvinism is about much more than depowering men. It is not at all altruistic as it proposes. It is about the social control of women and men, and the re-shaping of society. It does not promote real individuality, freedom of expression, or thought. The real question is who is actually benefiting from the social disharmony?
Older Guy
26 May 12 at 2:16 pm
@theantifeminist.
Could you please check your spam folder for my reply to ‘Older Guy’ on this topic?
I posted it but its not here.
Alan Vaughn
27 May 12 at 1:45 am
Great comment Older Guy.
Yes indeed, female chauvinism actually removes all of those freedoms, from all individuals and interest groups. It is the most significant social engineering strategy since the 15th century inquisitions, only this new-age 21st century version has NO useful purpose or outcome.
Thus the only answer to that question is: NOBODY. Nobody at all, not even those radical
feministsfemale chauvinists responsible for the invention and promotion of all of the nonsensical mantras, shaming tactics and assaults on individuals and on the destruction of or evil manipulation of the concept of the family unit… Nobody has ever benefitted from this insanity and nobody ever will.The question that should perhaps follow is:
How many millions of ordinary, good people will this evil accepted and embedded ideology destroy before they all wake up and see at last, what is happening to them and why, right before their very eyes?
Alan Vaughn
27 May 12 at 1:59 am
Sorry about that Alan.
theantifeminist
27 May 12 at 6:53 am
Thankyou for your comment Allan.
I do wonder though if we stepped away from the micro level of this social policy at the individual level and try to determine it’s true macro effects on social life what would we discover. I suspect we would probably identify who or what is actually happening from this social change.
Older Guy
27 May 12 at 8:15 am
Older Guy,
Yes we would (identify who or what is actually happening from this social change), which was what I was hinting towards when I mentioned in my reply: and on the destruction of or evil manipulation of the concept of the family unit…
It appears to me that most people are aware of how that once successful group structure has dramatically changed over the last 30 years or so, where fatherless families now number in the tens of millions throughout our society and are accepted as being ‘normal’, (albeit largely dysfunctional arrangements); yet few people seem to be aware of the underlying cause for that change. Even when to people such as yourself and most other commentators on this blog, who can clearly pinpoint the cause, the vast majority being so indoctrinated, refuse to accept what we attempt to highlight and even threaten to silence us for daring to question the domininant narratives they uphold.
The new-age, single parent (fatherless) family unit is of course only one example which forms a part of the overall bigger picture of our now dysfunctional and raped society…
Alan Vaughn
27 May 12 at 9:35 am
I hold the positive view that the embedded mechanisms could actually be addressed with ongoing public revelations of fact through a major networking of shared ideas at the public and academic level, gaining of a political voice, focusing on policies or lack of policies that allow school curriculum to be discriminative or biased, and offering governments an alternative social policy which does not limit economic stability or GDP growth.
Curriculum in my definition are the forces which influence educators decisions as to what they use as resources in classes and what they focus on to achieve learning. As an example not very long ago a female university academic in a national university decided to study the stories young children were reading in a number of schools. She collected several hundred story books and then analysed them for frequently used gender words. The words which were least used to describe family members were : father and husband. They were replaced with partner or mother’s friend. Young children are being molded in schools through inference to accept that the social norm for a family is to have the father replaced by a partner of mummy or that mummy will have close male friend instead of daddy. Perhaps even more importantly it is the building of a perception in young girls that it is the norm for a woman to not stay with their husband. It is the responsibility of educators to present all positive social influences not just those belonging to a dominant social group or those to which they may align themselves. I am in no way in favor of censorship or book burning but educators should be educating to create open minds not tunnel vision.
I am in favor of genuine equity. We have listened to the arguments for positive discrimination in the favor of women to expand their opportunities and to equal out the gender divide. However female inequity in the social science fields of education, psychology, sociology, anthropology, arts etc may not have actually existed for a number of decades.
If anything it was actually male participant inequity in these fields that has existed and I suspect this has not changed. These are the fields from which social change occurs. Change the balance of participants and you will change the social policies emerging from these fields. Presenting a true and accurate image of a modern male psyche could perhaps be a start. Social academics recognise for every hypothesis there is an antithesis then an eventual dialectic. A male focused society was the theme of the original hypothesis. Female chauvinism is the theme of the antithesis. The dialectic can only be genuine equality induced through proven inequity and not inferences.
Older Guy
27 May 12 at 11:11 am
Yes for sure, but one of the biggest problems with education is that most of the educational systems of our society are heavily influenced by, if not totally administered and controlled by the very female chauvinists you refer to, as are most things governments are responsible for. They are literally terrified of them, because they have mandated ridiculous laws based on the politically correct ‘social standards’ demanded by the female chauvinists. The governments have allowed them to practically dictate to them what needs to be changed or mandated, regardless of how ridiculous the reasons given for such changes are and they are almost powerless to refuse, due to the current and very effective politically correct laws making any dissent against them ‘sexist’ or ‘villafying’ or ‘hate speech’ or whatever; all of which are regarded by the governments themselves as very serious offenses. They have effectively entrapped themselves within their own stupid P.C. laws!
So we are now in effect, living under the rule and tyranny, thus at the mercy of these evil and vindictive beasts – female chauvinists.
It always makes me cringe in anger whenever I hear those replacement words you discuss, but it doesn’t stop in our learning institutions either, just watch any TV soap opera or even drama and you hear it and see it portrayed (in a very positive way of course) in almost any of them. Listen to any news broadcast on the radio or television, or read any newspaper where they are reporting anything involving a family and it is not possible to determine whether they refer to a real family (where the parents are married and all members of the family share the same last name), or the more accepted ‘de facto’ family.
On the same note: that P.C. term for the title of a female: ‘Ms’ is another one that really irritates me…
Alan Vaughn
27 May 12 at 11:35 pm
A recent estimate has revealed there are over a billion web sites and less than 10% of these are porn sites. Interestingly the female chauvinist agenda has appeared to label the internet as being full of porn and child pornography. Yes I firmly agree children should not be exposed to pornography. No one who is not interested in porn content should be exposed to it. However I wonder if some of the concerns being raised are about more than just exposure to pornography. The internet is really an unfettered source of information: the knowledge on it can not be controlled. Furthermore the placing of knowledge can be either altruistic or just a source of further social control. Go to some of the women student’s university sites and not the degree of social control and attitude distortion they are plying on their cohorts. Even the affiliate marketing blog sites are often saying something of some use to somebody. They have just disguised their real purpose and that is to try to make money. In consideration of a number of the topics on this blog I have attached the link below.
http://www.pacifica.edu/gems/kipnis/4knightsch9.pdf
There are many male professionals and male academics who hold common views regarding male sexuality in the state of female chauvinism. What has not been achieved is the achieving of a unified voice. While all the groups retain a binary structure without major networking a new male social voice will never be heard.
older guy
30 May 12 at 5:00 am