And this might just be her undoing – making explicit the modus operandi of the sexual trade union child ‘protection’ industry.

In claiming that ALL Italian women are degraded by Burlusconi’s actions (and by ‘all’, we know that she means all older unattractive women like herself) she is clearly admitting what this blog has always maintained.  Feminists argue for ever higher age of consent laws, and for ever more draconian statutory rape punishments, because such ‘crimes’ do not victimise the teenage girls involved, but rather the feminists themselves.  Cut away the feminst bullshit regarding ‘informed consent’, ‘imbalance in power’, etc., and what you have exposed to the raw sunlight (not good for the skin Valeria), is naked female sexual jealousy, red in tooth and claw.  Older men choosing younger females degrades older women in the menopausal minds of feminists, because it brings down the sexual value of themselves and other older women.  And in their twisted psychopathic minds, men must be caged and punished for that.  The victimisation through the legal process, and the child abuse industry, of the young girls themselves, is just the psychological price that they must pay in order that the sexual price of older women’s rancid pussies can be kept artificially ‘high’.

But Valeria’s admission should surely be enough to have her put on trial for the exploitation of young girls, financially profiting from both child abuse and illegal prostitution, as well as for the attempted rape, let alone degradation, of ALL Italian men.  When a teenage girl is torn from her older lover, forced into accepting the feminist label of child abuse victim, then made to testify against her lover and then required to undergo therapy whilst being told repeatedly that she will be damaged for life – that is clear and undeniable harm committed against the child.  The supposed harm that the older lover has caused to the ‘child’ is purely speculative and entirely unproven.  But not only unproven, the admission of Valeria Ajovalasit makes clear that the deliberate and demonstrable harm inflicted upon the young girl in statutory rape cases is actually done in order to ‘protect’ all (i.e. older) women.

There is another clearly disturbing element to this case.  Valeria Ajovalasit is attempting to explicitly seek financial gain from a crime that feminists themselves have invented.  As one of the leading feminist organisations in Italy, it’s quite likely that her ‘Arcidonna’ group itself was involved in the lobbying for the very law (paying for sex with a 17 year old) that she is now attempting to gain financially from.  Bloggers such as myself and Angry Harry have talked often of how the child protection industry profits from demonising and criminilising men, but it’s difficult to believe that feminists can get away with doing it in such a blatant manner.

Some of the comments left underneath the Telegraph article were very well put :

Bob Landy :

What a crazy world we live in. I thought that the problem was that Berlusconi had (allegedly) given money to women. Now women want him to give them money.

Make your mind up please

Willz :

So this women’s group wants to make money from the exploitation of other women? Isn’t that illegal?

Sandy :

Without necsessarily defending Berlusconi’simmorality, I do get a bit fed up with this constant bleat from some women that they are exploited by men. Actually it is the women who do the exploiting by using their sexual charms to make money from men’s overwhelming sexual urge. All Berlusconi’s women could have just walked away, and some probably did, but we never hear of those.

For more on the need for men to finally unite and form lobby groups to defend their sexuality from feminist sexual trade unionists such as Valeria Ajovalasit, please read :

Countersue women’s rights group for falsifying data

An Italian women’s rights group has asked the court overseeing Silvio Berlusconi’s sex trial for the right to seek compensation from the prime minister, claiming that he has offended the dignity of all Italian women.

Don’t get angry, as I did, when reading this.  No, as I have explained only this week when responding to comments here, this is how we can break the sexual trade union ourselves.

By sueing the asses off of the old rapist whores.

As soon as we have a half-decently organised and funded pro-male sexuality men’s rights lobby group we can start making civil claims against evil feminist organisations like the NSPCC and individuals such as Roselyn Bachelot, the woman who wants to jail Frenchmen for visiting prostitutes.

If there existed such a men’s rights lobby group in Italy, it could make a counter-claim against the feminists who passed the original anti-prostitution laws that criminilized the sexual choices and restricted the opportunities of all Italian men.  Including the feminist advocacy lobby groups that lobbied for such laws (that no doubt include the group behind this absurd claim against Berlusconi).  As I and others have documented, such lobbying has clearly been based upon deliberate lies, falsehoods, and exaggerations.  Let’s put the femiwhores on trial and make THEM justify their passing of these laws on something other than it increasing the appeal of their aged and unwanted vaginas to Italian men.  If they can’t do that, they should be sued as rapists, or better still, burnt at the stake (via due legal process of the state).

Valeria Ajovalasit, the woman behind the attempt to sue Silvio Berlusconi for somehow degrading her by paying for sex with a beautiful 17 year old girl :

I’m not even going to comment on that picture.  In fact I’m going to be sick.  And you still demand to explain feminism through cultural marxism?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Just to restore karma, here is a pic of the delightful Ruby the Heart Stealer, looking very exploited – NOT!  Look and weep Valeria Ajovalasit :