Excellent A Voice for Men Radio edition that focuses on the dire state of justice in Sweden, as well as outrage at the 6 year old boy who was charged for a sexual offence for playing doctors with a 5 year old girl ( 22 minute mark). Provokes the classic observation from Paul Elam – “The law is just an extension of my disposibility and of you and me as a utility, placed on earth only for the benefit of women.”
By Paul Elam – reprinted as requested : http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/03/29/the-movement-to-disbar-mary-n-kellett/
There are often times that we shake our heads at injustices in the world. Sometimes it seems to be all we can do. And with so many problems in modern life, and their often systemic, intractable nature, it can be difficult to choose what battles to fight and when. Because of this we have increasingly become a nation of head shakers, concerned about an array of injustices but often not knowing where to turn or what to do to solve them.
With that in mind we have an opportunity, right here and now, to face down and fight against a terrible injustice, an absolute evil, going on in the state of Maine.
Vladek Filler is about to face trial for a second time on the charge of raping his wife, Ligia. He was brought to trial the first time by Bar Harbor prosecutor Mary N. Kellett, who has sought to imprison Mr. Filler despite the fact that she knows that there is no physical evidence that he ever committed a crime, and despite the fact that his accuser Ligia Filler, has proven to be a violent criminal, a liar who has been caught in false allegations against her husband, and a physical and emotional abuser of her husband and children with a history of severe psychiatric problems.
Ligia Filler has been referred to as “certifiable” by sheriff’s department personnel who she repeatedly threatened to kill.
Mary Kellett’s professional conduct in this case breeches virtually all canons of legal ethics where it concerns prosecutors, from intentionally misleading jurors to avoiding pretrial discovery to actually asking a law enforcement officer to refuse to comply with a valid subpoena in order to help her conceal exculpatory evidence.
All of this, and many other similar cases, have been conducted under the supervision of Bar Harbor, Maine, District Attorney Carletta Bassano, leading to the almost unavoidable conclusion that the problem is not just one rogue prosecutor, but one in which District Attorney Bassano is an enabling accomplice.
Additionally, all of these events have transpired without so much as raising an eyebrow in local news media.
Given the complicity of her supervisor and the lack of attention by local media, Kellet appears emboldened to continue this reign of terror on the life of Vladek Filler, his children, and other innocents who reside in the community Kellett is supposed to protect.
After having Filler’s first conviction overturned by the Maine Supreme Court, due to her own prosecutorial misconduct, she is coming after him again, putting him through another trial on the same slipshod evidence.
Kellett is not pursuing justice; she is making a mockery of it in ways that border on criminality. She is out of control and no one with authority over her is doing anything about it.
And given the hubris demonstrated by her actions, it is clear she feels free to proceed with impunity.
We cannot, must not, allow this to happen.
This is a battle worth choosing to fight, and A Voice for Men is not the only place that is happening. Glenn Sacks at Father’s and Families, the nation’s leader in father’s rights advocacy is speaking out about this story. You can also read about it at The False Rape Society. This article will also be running at the-spearhead.com, with thanks to our good friend Mr. W.F. Price.
The organization Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (S.A.V.E.) has taken an even more significant action, sending a Complaint for the Disbarment of Prosecutor Mary Kellett to the Maine Board of Overseers for the Bar.
They have also authored a letter to Paul LePage, the Governor of Maine, referencing the disbarment complaint and making an appeal for an intervention on Mary Kellett on behalf of Vladek Filler and the people of Maine.
And you can do your part.
Write Governor LePage here and respectfully insist on an investigation to the practices of Mary N. Kellett. The message can be as simple as. “For the sake of justice, please assure that Mary Kellett is relieved of her prosecutorial duties and disbarred from the practice of law.”
Write the Board of overseers for the Bar here, and insist that they respond to the allegations against Kellett with an investigation.
Lastly, try to get the media involved. Bill Trotter does crime reporting for the Bangor Daily News. You can write email him at firstname.lastname@example.org or phone him at 207-460-6318 and ask him to consider investigating this story. This is a very important step as media attention will require political attention and action of some kind.
Don’t wait for others to do this, please, or think that just one person calling and writing is enough. That would be a fatal mistake.
When you have done one or all the suggestions listed here, please come back to this thread and simply put the word “done” in the comments, wherever you are reading this.
What is happening in Maine is only a microcosm of what is happening across the western world. So regardless of where you live, your insistent message to one or all of these people can help force them to consider looking in to Kellett’s activities. And make no mistake about it, Kellett’s actions, if unchecked, are a forecast of own future. We know this is a witch hunt, but because most are ignoring it, it will spread. If we take this silently, we have lost in the most tragic and disgraceful of ways.
This is a fight worth fighting, people. If you are reading this, you could be another Vladek Filler, or someone who cares about him. Your children could be hurt the same way his children have. And your freedom, even if seemingly secure today, cannot be assured for tomorrow as long as the likes of Mary Kellett are allowed to practice predatory prosecutions against innocent human beings.
And If she is allowed to build a career on doing this, there will be nothing to stop the same from happening where you live.
It is your future, and your move.
[Addendum: A Voice for Men Radio is doing a one hour special on this tonight, March 29, 2011 at 9:00 p.m. EST. You can listen to the show live, or the archives are always available in the sidebar at avoiceformen.com. immediately following the program.]
Please sign the petition at Change.org : http://www.change.org/petitions/help-disbar-assistant-district-attorney-mary-kellett-for-prosecutorial-misconduct#?opt_new=t&opt_fb=t
Couldn’t resist posting this work of genius :
Massively downvoted of course. One of the two reddit men’s rights moderators who persistantly refuse to ban such trolls – ignatiusloyla, made the following typicaly revealing comment concerning the image :
Really? A meme image? Give me a break.
I didn’t think the populace of r/MR had devolved enough to think that posting this type of crap was a good idea. There is enough of it in r/pics, r/funny and all those subreddits.
Have a point to make? Make the point and open a dialogue. But these meme posts are so overdone, and very ineffective at making the point.
Or maybe I am just so sick of them that I am thoroughly annoyed when I see them.
Meanwhile, it seems to be the majority view at Reddit that Paul Elam is an extremist fringe figure in the movement. I’ve had major disagreements with Paul, but nobody can deny that he’s currently taking men’s rights forward more than any other activist. His blisteringly raw and honest piece entitled ‘the scourge of rape. yea, whatever’ was predictably savaged by the concern trolls at Reddit.
Of course, what these feminist trolls understand is that if men are truly woken up to the extent that they can question even the most holy of gynocratic dogmas, then it’s only a matter of time before their intellectual free lunch is over. The shocking truth of essays like the above, presented fearlessly and with an ‘I don’t give a fuck if you don’t like it’ attitude, is exactly the kind of thing that might wake men up from their sleep.
Another gem I can’t resist posting – Krauser PUA almost decking his first Brazillian anti-English Western civilisation hating cock block :
Having returned from my annual pilgrimage to the grave of Arthur Schopenhauer in Frankfurt, I will now write the piece I promised earlier. An important piece, detailing as it does, a development in the course of anti-feminism that has probably had the old misery guts himself turning in his grave, as well as Ernest Belfort Bax, the very first men’s rights activist, not to mention Steve Moxon, and quite a few others, choking on their breakfast cereal in disbelief and dismay.
In the last couple of weeks, there has been a wave of excitement at the prospect of the men’s rights movement finally breaking through to the masses. In particular, we have had the announcement of both the Futurist’s urls@urinals campaign, and Paul Elam’s proposed men’s rights internet radio station.
But, however inspiring and potentially massive these developments undoubtedly are, they are both arguably dwarfed by another less noticed and talked about breakthrough – Men’s Rights is now on the default list of Reddit, the internet’s biggest social bookmarking hub. As a consequence, that subreddit, already the largest online men’s rights community by far, is now attracting over 100 new members each and every day.
It would be impossible to put a monetry value upon that kind of free publicity for our movement. Businesses would pay thousands, if not millions of dollars for that kind of advertising. It’s the equivalent of men’s rights flyers being put up in a thousand urinals every day, or HBO dedicating an hour’s programming each week solely to men’s rights issues.
But there is a problem. Kloo2Yoo, the creator and moderator of a men’s rights community that will probably have over 100,000 members by the end of next year, is either a feminist or an idiot. This has been discussed previously both here and elsewhere, but recently it’s taken on an even more disturbing and sinister turn.
Kloo2yoo recently submitted a post to r/mensrights linking to the story of a woman who takes her 5 year old son around America on book signing tours and daytime chat shows, with the little boy ‘happily’ dressed in pink skirts and other exaggeratedly girlie attire. To the title of his post, he added the question as to what name we should invent to encourage other pre-school male toddlers who ‘want’ to escape the patriarchal shackles of their imposed gender, and to dress up as little girls – or circus freaks, for Oprah Winfrey and her like.
Now, I consider myself about as far away from the alpha-male wannabe ultra-conservative patriarch men’s rights charicature that some of our enemies (and some idiots in our movement) want to portray and define all of us as being. I’ve been a vegetarian since the age of 5. This is my favourite video on YouTube. Well, actually, maybe this is. One of the most beautiful human beings I ever met was a 16 year old girl trapped inside the body of a boy (and mentally tortured because, quite reasonably, in the UK, you have to be 18 before you are deemed mature enough to consent to go through with a sex change operation). I certainly have nothing against transexuals and certainly nothing against fighting society’s fixed definitions of what it is to be a man (which comes from the sexual needs of women as much as the needs of ‘patriarchal’ society).
But we’re talking about pre-schoolers here, and a woman who is messing with her 5 year old son’s very identity for highly questionable motives.
The other disturbing aspect of this is that Kloo2Yoo then approves a radical feminist troll (thepinkmask or catlebrity) posting tips on how to encourage your own pre-school son to accept that they are really, in actual fact, girls.
Arguing against feminists criminalizing as subhuman paedophiles the 99% of the global male population who will ,at one time or another, inevitably click upon an image of a 30 year old woman in pigtails, whilst surfing for porn, is not men’s rights or anti-feminism (despite what Steve Moxon says), and will get you an immediate ban, yet supporting radical feminists cross-dressing and interfering with the very soul and identity of your little pre-schooler IS men’s rights.
Apparently. In the world of Kloo2Yoo.
Well, I want no part of it. But the most important thing is, the men’s rights community should surely want no part in it. But there’s more. Last week, Kloo2Yoo effectively admitted that he was a feminist.
The fact that reddit.com/r/mensrights has been so spectacularly successful hasn’t got much to do with kloo2 whatsoever. Rather, it has everything to do with the work and posting of relevant links by the likes of Pierce Harlan and others. Kloo2, in effect, got lucky, by being the first person to create a subreddit by the name of ‘mensrights’. But last week’s admission by Kloo2 suggests that, rather than being simply the lucky idiot that he often comes across as, he is in fact a feminist and misandrist and that r/mensrights is, indeed, a veritable attempt at creating a false flag operation against our movement.
Kloo2’s admission that he had set up feminist subreddits BEFORE creating r/mensrights, was made in a comment to a post entitled something along the lines of ‘I propose that we hereby identify ourselves as being true feminists rather than as men’s rights activists‘. The post, although massively and typically upvoted by the feminist brigade, has seemingly been mysteriously deleted. Presumably, because I left a comment calling Kloo2 out on his admission. Kloo2 also made a comment offering to hand over r/mensrights to the person who made the post. Again, he did this because either he is simply retarded, or 13 years old as some have claimed, or because he is indeed a feminist trojan horse.
What can be done?
I have set up an alternative reddit that is more open to an array of diverging but genuine men’s rights views, and less tolerant of obvious feminist trolls : http://reddit.com/r/mensrightsmovement, but, to be honest, it has no hope of competing with r/mensrights, and nor should it have to. As I explained earlier, Reddit.com/r/mensrights is a potential Godsend and a certain breakthrough for the movement. If Kloo2yoo is merely an idiot, rather than being a sinister part of a feminist operation to control the voice and development of the men’s rights movement, then he has a moral duty right now to allow other, more senior and intelligent members of our movement, to become moderators. People like AngryHarry, Paul Elam, ManWomanMyth, the Futurist, and Pierce Harlan. In fact, above all Pierce Harlan, as it is his hard work that has made that reddit what it potentially is, in spite of kloo2yoo’s idiocy and betrayal in allowing the place to become infested with feminist trolls and puritanical lunatics ( a recent post by Harlan detailing the way in which sex offenders are forced to masturbate recieved almost as many downvotes as upvotes).
I suggest that some kind of petition, some concrete moral pressure at least, is put upon Kloo2Yoo to allow senior and genuine men’s rights activists to become moderators of r/mensrights. I would further suggest that the position of that community in shaping the future voice of our movement is so vast and obvious that it may even require that others in the movement offer to purchase ownership of r/mensrights from Kloo2Yoo.
Whatever the solution is, I hope you’ll agree that this is an important issue that needs to be discussed.
The Futurist (Fifth Horseman) – the author of ‘The Misandry Bubble’ – revealed a new strategy to kickstart the men’s rights movement into going viral – ‘URLs for Urinals’ consists of posting men’s rights flyers on to the spaces above men’s urinals. Jay Hammers has some ready made versions for you to print out and start posting : https://sites.google.com/site/jaymhammers/files/misandry-01-03-11.ppt
Perhaps it would be a good idea if we all took photos of our activist deeds? Of course, taking photographs in a men’s urinals is always a bit open to misinterpretation, but I guess most of us will be putting up the flyers when the loos are empty. So get posting and snapping, scream homophobia if anybody ‘catches’ you (you could claim they are gay rights flyers), and then publish the photos online as proof of your good work and as inspiration for others. I’ll try to put a photo up here myself in the next couple of weeks.
And just to prove that the men’s rights movement is gaining ground, or at least attention, both the Futurist and Paul Elam were referred to in a New York Times piece entitled ‘The Study of Man’, with Paul Elam’s website actually linked to. Some cheeky conspiracy theorists have suggested that the author of the apparently damning piece might actually be sympathetic to the cause. As I’ve mentioned here before, the traditional publishing industry is in slave to the female dollar. This was highlighted a year or so ago when the outspoken Rod Liddle was effectively blocked from becoming editor of the British ‘Independent’ broadsheet newspaper because of concerns that his regular anti-feminist statements might turn off women readers. If Charles McGrath, who wrote the New York Times article, really had wanted to bash men’s rights, he could have chosen some far more ‘mysogynistic’ websites than Paul’s. In fact, he linked to one of the men’s rights sites most likely to appear reasonable to the average male reader of that paper.
Not that, in my humble and perhaps biased opinion, any publicity is bad publicity for the men’s rights movement. At the moment, the fact is, 90% of men don’t even know we exist. With more mainstream media outlets now covering the movement every now and again, the outlook is clearly more positive that this will change, albeit rather slowly. The main task is still to wake men up from their feminist induced chivalrous stupour. Men won’t listen until they can hear us.
The biggest threat to any growing men’s rights movement is still that some voices will be silenced at the expense of others. I don’t apologise for the controversial subjects that I discuss in this blog. However big men’s rights might become, it won’t speak for all men, or even a minority of men, unless such topics are part of the movement. I firmly believe that there is nothing I have said of importance on this site that key men’s rights supporters and anti-feminists from Schopenhauer to Ernest Belfort Bax, to the likes of modern writers such as Neil Lyndon and Steve Moxon, wouldn’t recognise to be manifestly true and obvious. And when a ‘senior’ men’s rights activist tells me, as one did last week, that the possibility of feminists raising the age of consent to 20 is not a men’s rights issue, and to think that it is is tantamount to campaigning for paedophilia, then that person is either a fraud or a coward, or at least he is on this issue.
At the minimum, such men’s rights supporters should be consistant. For example – if you truly believe that it is so manifestly obvious that men should go to prison to be raped as paedophiles for having consensual sex with women old enough to vote – and that this is consistant with men’s rights, then you shouldn’t also hold that it is right for politically motivated radical feminists to interfere with the very identities of 3 year old toddlers, as Kloo2Yoo, the moderator of reddit.com/r/mensrights, appears to do here : http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/exrxm/princessboy_supporting_crossdressing_behaviour_in/c1bs2o0?context=3
THE FEMINIST ABUSE OF INFANTS IS NOT MEN’S RIGHTS – I WANT NO PART OF IT.
I will be devoting an entire article to this later in the week.
An articulate and reflective PUA ruminates upon the moral issues of being paid by horny young males in order to help them get knee-deep in pussy :
Generally, we are getting students who are seriously vulnerable to the predations of women. Like a dog who chases a car down the street and then doesn’t know what to do when it catches up, like the fool who grabs a tiger by the tail, we in the seduction community are teaching guys to walk into a trap. What trap?
- False paternity claims and ensuing child support that will cripple them financially
- Emotional abuse from passive aggressive bitches who try to destroy your self esteem and your faith in humanity
- STDs, some of which can ruin your fertility or harm your future wife
- False rape claims that will see your reputation ruined, your career ended, and likely a long stint in jail just because some whore gets buyers remorse
Now I’m not going into the topic of whether the PUA life is a shallow one. That’s an oversold meme and I care little for it. I’m talking about this:
By encouraging naïve men to sleep with many women, we are exposing them to risks they don’t even know exist.
Like most in the MRM, I have an ambivalent attitude towards the PUA community. Some argue that it gives men control, others that it makes you a slave to pussy. At least this PUA guru is aware of the risks involved.
In brief, my politically incorrect view of ‘the Game’ is as follows : The pick-up-artist community originated in multi-cultural centers such as Toronto as a response to the inability of white geeks, earning up-to 6 figure salaries, to compete with urban black men and other ‘naturals’ in the free sexual market. This ‘extension of the domain of the struggle’ constitutes the underlying theme of all of Michel Houellebecq’s novels. The economic jungle has extended into the private realm, yet with a different set of rules, a different set of winners and losers, and with no equivalent to taxation or a welfare safety net to reduce the worst discrepancies in outcome. At least for men. Older, unattractive women, the female losers in the free sexual market, have of course organised themselves through feminism into a highly effective sexual trade union that is making it increasingly dangerous or illegal for men to pursue young females. At the same time as allowing women themselves to easily cuckold their husbands and spend their massive divorce payouts in hunting for big bamboo, in nightclubs or on the beaches of Jamaica.
The differing male/female responses to the creation of the free sexual marketplace surely tell us a lot about our respective psychologies, and why men’s rights continues to make miniscule headway in comparison to the march of feminism. Men seem unable to policiticize their sexual rights (as normal, heterosexual men). Hell, most men won’t even admit that women prefer black cock. Of course, it’s true as well that most women won’t admit openly the even more obvious truth that men prefer teenage girls (many men won’t). But every woman knows in her own head that it’s the truth. This is why they are able to create world-wide political movements that transfrom social ethics within decades, whereas men can only come up with ‘the Mystery Method’, something that appeals to men individually, and our instinctive and primal need to compete with other men in order to get pussy.
Men analyse and compete, women politicize and unite.
Of course, it’s a good thing that men do not (or no longer) further their own sexual interests through the creation of spurious laws that criminilize white women having interracial sex, in the way that women have created laws that destroy men for even looking at younger females. But it’s probably also true that the only hope for the men’s rights movement is if the much larger, and more relevant to young men PUA community can become in someway politicised. Men too, have to learn that the personal has become political, and not just a game.
I would also add that, in my view, the efforts of the PUA community are an attempt to restore IQ to sexual selection (indirectly through the skill of the game, just as high male IQ was selected for previously indirectly via wealth/high status). In a sense therefore, PUAs are possiblenoble saviours of civilisation (along with Transhumanism). (The Fifth Horseman made a great comment regarding this at Anti-Feminist Tech, I haven’t yet been able to re-locate the article for the link).
A Florida man is facing five years in prison because he photographed two teenage girls flashing their breasts on the side of the road.Robert Lee Blevins
Turns out, the girls were 15-years-old, according to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune.
It is not clear if Robert Lee Blevins, 33, was aware of their age when he pulled his car up alongside them and snapped a photo.
This is why this blog exists, why its subtitle is the ‘rape of the male’, and why I have absolutely no regret in questioning the age of consent laws that underpin such madness.
And of course, taking photos of a bullied 15 year old girl dying in the street is pefectly legal, and no doubt will end up on a dozen sick American websites, with no objections from the FemiWhores, their sexual trade union ‘child protection’ groups, or Republican congressmen.
A glimpse of collective hysteria, 80 years into the past(misandry review)
The movie depicts an entire urban community in the grip of mass hysteria and fear as they struggle to track down and identify a child murderer. The police throw their full resources into finding the killer, but after eight months they still have nothing to show for their efforts. One of the problems that the overworked police force faces is a deluge of false allegations from a hyper-frightened public. In one poignant scene, a man who is walking down the street is approached by a little girl and asked what time it is. He gives her the time, but this act alone incites a mob of accusing onlookers, screaming that this man must be the child-killer and culminating in the police hauling him off to be questioned. Another scene shows a group of men sitting around a table in rapt attention as one reads them a newspaper article. That article prompts one of the paranoid men to accuse the one sitting directly across from him of being the killer. Threats between them ensue.
Women’s sexual peak rests atop a pile of lies (Paul Elam)
Where else but the current gender Zeitgeist can a woman with crows feet, sagging breasts, reduced sexual hormones, a vagina that does not lubricate as it once did, more difficulty conceiving and less ability to attract sexual partners of their preference, stand up and say “I am in my sexual prime,” and have everyone in their presence nod their head in agreement?
Only in a world where we tell women whatever they want to hear, no matter how ridiculous.