Sally Dowler said she had been attempting to call Milly’s mobile constantly in the weeks after she disappeared in March 2002 but could not get through because the mailbox was full.

She eventually succeeded because some of the messages had been deleted and immediately thought Milly must still be alive.

Giving an emotional testimony to the Leveson inquiry into press standards yesterday, Mrs Dowler said: “It clicked through onto her voicemail, so I heard her voice.”

Mrs Dowler said she immediately cried out to her husband: “She’s picked up her voicemail, Bob, she’s alive.”

But the couples’ hopes were cruelly dashed because rather than the teenager deleting her messages, it is alleged it was private detective Glenn Mulcaire, who had been working on the orders of the News of the World.

A drama teacher who watched as two teenagers had sex on the back seat of his car has been jailed.

A 16-year-old girl and a 17-year-old boy had sex in William Drury’s car as he drove them home from his house in Chester Road, Halifax, West Yorkshire.

Jurors heard he told the girl he loved her and kissed her. He also took photographs of her topless.

Drury, 48, was found guilty of a series of sex offences by a jury at Leeds Crown Court and jailed for three years.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-15719369

Remember that the age of consent in the UK is 16.  Between 16 and 17, however, an older partner can be charged if in ‘a position of authority’ over the teen – such a teacher.

But this is the first time I’ve read of a teacher receiving such a charge when he has barely laid a finger on his pupil.  And THREE years?? Female teachers can bang their ‘lucky’ 14 year old boy pupils and rarely even have to go to jail. What this teacher did was ‘inappropriate’, but at the end of the day, there is something sick about society that condemns a man to three years in jail for watching two people over the age of consent have sex.

Why would any man even consider becoming a teacher in the UK anymore?

And it’s not just about false accusations.  Any man who tells himself that he could be surrounded by beautiful, nubile young females, for his entire working life, and NEVER once give into temptation under any circumstances, has in my opinion a poor grasp of reality.

I can’t add much to the excellent analysis by Manuel Dexter. The most disturbing aspect of the video I found was the ending, with the girl scratching yet another notch on the wall after laying waste to the would be child rapist. The implication is that there are literally dozens of (male) paedophiles in every neighbourhood plotting to rape little girls and that with just a little entrapment, vigilante justice can leave a trail of dead paedos in its wake.

The man behind the ‘song’ is ‘Skrillex’, otherwise known as Sonny Moore. Here’s a photo of him below :

The guy is only 23 but already probably gives little girls nightmares every time he walks down the street. Even when he grows up and acquires a more conservative look – in fact especially when he grows up and acquires a more conservative look, he’s going to look like a classic paedophile (if there is such a thing). I’m sure he’ll quickly learn that a man sitting on a park bench alone these days is a little bit like a black man daring to sit on a bench reserved for Afrikaners in apartheid South Africa..

The one commendable thing about the video is that it does at least show the paedophile as a paedophile – i.e. pursuing an interest in little pre-pubescent girls. Probably 99.9% of real clinical paedophiles have no desire to rape children, of course – ‘paedophilia’, after all, means the love of children. But discussing real paedophila, a genuine clinical perversion whose (sexual) expression can and does leave real victims, is beyond the scope of this blog. So I’ll just repeat what I’ve said here before – most of the social obsession with ‘paedophilia’, especially in America, is actually targetted at men who chase teenage girls. This is why, for example, Chris Hanson would say ‘why don’t you have a seat right here’ not to real paedophiles but rather always beta males who had attempted to seek out sexy jailbait over the internet. And of course, feminists have no interest whatsoever in the real sexual abuse of pre-pubescent children (aside from using it to demonise men and to conflate it with the natural male interest in teenage girls and even, increasingly, young women).

The movie ‘Hard Candy’ is a more typical ‘paedo’ narrative of the last decade, and it also features the same kind of victim vigilante justice. In this genuinely nauseating movie, a ‘little’ 14 year old girl extracts the most appalling violent ‘justice’ upon a lonely middle-aged man who she entraps into seeking her out. This film pretty much perfectly reflects the strange blend of American puritanism, violent voyeurism, sexual hypocrisy, and feminism, that is eating away at Western society and morality. Most of the audience probably went to see the movie for two reasons – 1/ hoping to get a cop of the body of the sexy (Juno) actress who plays the ‘little’ girl, and 2/ to get their fix of extreme mindless violence at the end, when the guy gets his balls sawn off, whilst screaming ‘why don’t you have a seat right here’ at their own dicks. The film contains a deep contradiction at its heart – 14 year old girls are so innocent and pure and unable to know their own minds that any man who has a sexual interest in them deserves to be horrifically mutilated, tortured and killed. At the same time, the 14 year old girl is apparently an example of feminist ‘girl power’. Don’t mess with her – in the 21st century, she’s as strong and as feisty and knows her own mind as any man out there!

The most disturbing and quite literally vomit inducing trailer for Hard Candy on YouTube is the following video (embedding disabled on request) that has been set to the beautiful background music of Radiohead. Radiohead are fronted by Thom Yorke – a man who I’d bet my life on has masturbated once or twice to the image of a sexy jailbait in his head (in fact, he’s admitted to being a chronic masturbator during his university years).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP8_hUXgK_U

Reading some of the comments below it gives you a disturbing glimpse inside the fecid minds of what passes as ‘liberal’ progressives in the 21st century. This is a culture that thinks you’re an incarnation of the devil himself if you ever express any doubt about the morality of men fisting other men up the ass, scream in horror if you dare to suggest that Guantanomo Bay might have been possibly justified in the context of terrorists wanting to nuke America, and yet would happily see men – men who possibly have brains more in common with adolescents than adults – tortured and killed for simply being attracted to teenage girls. All because of the feminist narrative of male = predator, female = innocence..conjoined with a dose of late medieval anglo-saxon sexual puritanism and witch hunt mentality.

A more authentic Radiohead video is the following (14 sec ad will appear first)  :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BciOfJsqh7M&ob=av3e&t=2m30s

Before we leave the feminist narrative of male as predator, female as innocent girl child, one more video to share with you. As an athletics fan, I’ve just been watching a video over my breakfast of Usain Bolt competing last night in Croatia. While Bolt was being shown warming up, I literally choked on my cornflakes. What the hell is going on here?? Can even 11 year old white girls not control themselves in the presence of black men???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS6-f37HaeU&t=1m40s

(I must add that Bolt is clearly doing nothing wrong, and neither, of course, is the girl, and it is surely entirely innocent – I just thought it was funny, in an innocent way, and had to share it).

The Daily Mail reported that an 18 year old ‘predatory paedophile‘, who was between 14 and 17 at the time of the offences and was found to have a mental age of 12 upon his arrest, has been jailed for 10 years for having sex with girls from 12 – 15.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2012717/Facebook-sex-abuser-Jake-Ormerod-jailed-Torbay-paedophile-ring.html

I’m not defending this scummy individual, but the portrayal of him as a paedophile is simply laughable.  Or rather, deeply disturbing, coming as it does only days after the sickening depths to which the British media were willing to go to provide the public with shocking paedophile stories was revealed.

Paedophile?  No.  Teenage boys, with the mental age of a pre-pubescent child, who fuck other teenagers, however many, are not paedophiles.  To abuse and debase the word to that extent in order to sell newspapers, and to ultimately warn older men not to chase sexy teenage girls, is absolutely disgusting.

Facebook grooming? No.  Grooming is middle-aged men posing as children in order to trick real children into meeting them, not teenage boys chatting with their teenage fuck buddys online.

Did he ply them with drugs before sexually assualting them?  Given the other exaggerations, and the statement that the girls were ‘often under the influence of cannabis’ we can safely say that this is a teenage boy who uses cannabis fucking other teenagers who also smoke cannabis.

I reported on this story earlier in the year, and explained how it appeared conveniently and sensationally in the media the very same week the police, press, and government all need to whip the public into another one of its regular peado hysterics in the wake of the EU ruling that sex offenders could challenge their place on the register.

Meanwhile 18 year old Scottish footballer Craig Johnson has also been the victim of an online witchunt over the fact that he sent a 13 year old girl (that he knew in real life) a picture of his dick.  The leggings wearing large breasted girl (facts dutily noted for male readers of Scottish tabloids) was said to have had her life destroyed by the sight, and advertisers threatened to boycott the boy’s club (Hearts) unless they sacked him (although he had served his sentance, admitted his guilt, and apologised profusely).

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2011/07/11/hearts-child-sex-shame-footballer-craig-thomson-booted-out-at-last-86908-23263026/

This in a country in which middle-aged female teachers can ‘break in’ their 14 year old boy pupils and recieve token jail sentances (and sometimes not even that) and a great deal of sympathy in the press and amongst the public.

And here’s the evil Rebekah Wade announcing to the News of the World staff that they must lose their jobs instead of her…and still defending paedohysteria (the infamous Sarah’s law) to the end :

Gay activists in Brazil are delighted.  One claimed that “the degree of civilisation of a country can be measured by the way people in a nation treat their homosexual community”.  It seems that Brazil can continue to have 12 million kids sleeping on the streets, hundreds of whom are killed and mutiliated by death squads each year, but so long as we pretend that gay men have as much innate desire as heterosexual women do to spend their entire lives monogamously with one partner, then Brazil shall be proudly awarded a place amongst the 21st century liberal progressive club of civilised nations. 

Nor does the mark of a civilisation seemingly depend on the way in which ordinary heterosexuals are treated by society.  Men are biologically programmed to find fertility and youth, as well as physical markers of virginity, sexually attractive in females.  Girls increasingly begin puberty well before they are even into their teens, yet through feminist lobbying, conservative puritanism, and media hysteria, we have created a society that defines men who openly show attraction towards 16 and 17 year old females as the worst kind of subhuman sexual devient, and even pursuing an interest in young women aged between 18 and 25 now carries with it the risk of falling foul of ‘anti-paedophile’ legislation or social ostracisation.

And are gays themselves really treated much better by society than before?  The supreme act of denial behind the more ‘tolerant’ treatment of homosexuals is that the worship of youth and beauty has not been central to homosexual culture throughout history.  I don’t wish to denounce or degrade this love – after all, through the ancient Athenian thinkers and the Florentine renaissance artists, it gave us our very civilisation….twice.  But it is in an undeniable fact, and it would be harder to name a homosexual in history who wasn’t attracted to youth than it would be to reel off the great rollcall of homosexual ephebophiles – from Socrates to Morrissey (celibate).

Recently, the out-going British Labour government awarded a state apology to the deceased Alan Turing, the inventor of the computer and arguably a man who did as much to save the world from the Nazis as Winston Churchill himself.  A man who picked up and sodomized a teenage boy (he was 19, but I wonder if he asked him for his ID?) knowing full well the social attitude to such a crime (at the time) and the risks to himself if caught – which he was, and then chemically castrated and imprisoned, causing him to commit suicide soon after release.  We are supposed to believe that if alive in one of our progressive civilised societies today, such a man would never once in his lifetime, likely spent largely at the computer which he invented, succumb to temptation and click on a picture of a boyish looking man in his underwear – a crime soon to be punished by a minimum of 2 years in prison throughout Europe under absurd and evil virtual child porn laws created by feminists.

So why have gay men sold their souls to the feminist devil, and why does society pretend that homosexual men have been liberated, now that they can legally marry (which 99% of gay men probably have not the slightest inclination to do) and yet, just like heterosexual men, face a 5 am boot through the door if they so much as idly click once on a cartoon picture of a sexy manga ‘boy’?

The truth is feminists need to maintain the pretence that they are a civilising, progressive, and ‘sexually tolerant’ force, rather than the brutal anti-enlightenment illiberal fascists that they are, conducting a brutal war upon ordinary and healthy male sexuality.  They do this by promoting the rights of gays and transexuals, a tiny minority of the population, whilst criminilising as perverted monsters the vast majority of heterosexual men.

They have carefully engineered a situation whereby homosexuals have been granted escape from decades of formal and open prosecution, but only on condition that they renounce and disown their own culture and history – that of the love of youth.  A love that twice inspired the dawn of western civilisation.  Thus the feminist controlled United Nations only allowed homosexual lobby groups priviliged access when they agreed to denounce and reject any gay rights groups in their ranks that supported the lowering of the age of consent.  The sexual trade union has expertly ensured that the success of gay rights is almost dependent upon the ever increasing hatred and savegary towards ‘paedophiles’, something only possible through collective amnesia towards the fact that virtually every great homosexual in history was such a ‘paedophile’.

This is a true faustian pact with the devil on the part of homosexuals, but it is a short-sighted one.  Already a gay Austrian man has been jailed for looking at pictures in the privacy of his own home which involved, in the admission of the court, not one person under the age of 21.  The story of Jonathan King reminds us of the absurdity of believing that ever more savage paedohysteria can possibly be consistent with fairness towards gays – here was a 1960′s icon and gay man punished mercilessly by the courts and the media for allegedly having sex with boys in the free love era of the 60′s and 70′s – a time when every heterosexual pop star worth his name was banging every 14 year old groupie they could get hold of (witness how Americans still worship Elvis Presley, despite his predilection for pink pantie clad 13 year old girls being well documented).

Not only will homosexual men increasingly face criminalization as a result of paedohysteria, but feminists will soon drop their gay allies of convenience as the power of Islam grows, and they are forced to choose between the two.  This is already happening at the United Nations, where thanks to Islamic lobbying, reference to sexual persecution was dropped from the definitions of genocide.

Gay men have gone along with this Faustian pact in the manner of the granny muggers who spit on the sex offenders in jail.  Simple relief and self-esteem that society has found somebody to hate even more than them.  It ignores the great history of homosexuality, and it ignores fundamental issues of real justness and true sexual tolerance.  They would be wise to understand that, as Orwell observed, the object of the irrational mob’s torchbeam of hatred can be switched by the leaders at any moment.  You cannot build a lasting sexual tolerance upon the most vile and savage sexual intolerance that the world has ever known, a hatred that would make the average medieval flat-Earther blush at its very ignorance and stupidity.

I’m not going to publish the photo here, although it is clearly not sexual in any way but simply a funny, innocent picture (although with the caption it does carry a profound anti-feminist message)  but if you Google the girl’s words (as I did) you will find it on hundreds of sites.  Some Redditors claim that the picture has appeared on Hallmark cards.  It’s the kind of innocent picture that only a paedophile could see anything sexual or pornographic in.

As well as reporting the photo to ‘law enforcement’ and potentially causing a men’s rights supporter some unpleasant hassle, Kloo2 also claimed to have seriously thought about locking the men’s rights reddit, which is now by far and away the largest online men’s rights community with over 21,000 members and counting.  This clown, supported by his feminist Men’s Rights Fraud co-moderator Ignatiusloyola, is the biggest single threat to the growth of the movement.  The time has surely come to finally put pressure on these two idiots to hand over the most important men’s rights resource to more able and genuine men’s rights activists.

This is what some of the other outraged men’s rights redditors had to say about Kloo’s actions :

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g959a/i_am_begging_users_if_you_see_sexual_images/

Last Friday, just a couple of days after the media had already whipped the mob into a frenzy over the EU granting a ‘charter for pedos’, I was puzzled and a little disturbed to see on the front page of the BBC, a report that a 19 year old boy had been arrested for touching other teenagers.

‘Quiet news day?’, I thought to myself.  Or did the BBC have a strict quota of ‘paedo’ stories they had to publish each week, even if they seemed to involve nothing more than a young lad groping other teenies?  I was a little angry that the BBC had published the lad’s name on the front page of their website, before he had even had his trial.  Now he’s going to be branded a paedophile for the rest of his life, even if he is found innocent. But it was when the same story immediately started being regurgigated across other news sites, with ever more hysterical ‘facts’, that I twigged that this was clearly a contrived and carefully manipulated response to recent political events.

From the British Tablid ‘The Mirror’ :

ABOUT 50 children may be victims of a sickening sex exploitation ring operating in one of Britain’s holiday resorts.

Police yesterday revealed the youngsters – mostly girls aged 12 to 15 – are feared to have been raped or sexually abused and suspect they were lured by the gang on Facebook or other internet sites.

Detectives are interviewing 20 alleged victims, including some boys, but admit the scale of the horrific abuse could be much worse.

A 19-year-old youth was yesterday arrested as 50 police officers began a major investigation into the alleged sex attacks over three years. More arrests are expected soon

The culprits are thought to be a gang of males in their late teens preying on youngsters in the Torbay area of South Devon, dubbed the English Riviera.

More than 16,000 worried parents with children at 14 secondary schools in the area, including the resorts of Torquay and Paignton, have been sent a letter informing them of the police investigation.

A police source confirmed to the Mirror: “The inquiry is still at an early stage but the number of victims could be 50 at the top end.”

The victims, at least two of whom were children in care, are said to have been abused after getting to know members of the gang – possibly after being groomed on popular social networking sites such as Facebook or Bebo.

Detective Inspector Simon Snell, who is leading the investigation – codenamed Operation Mansfield – said: “We’re treating this very seriously. Each offence took place in Torbay but not in schools. The alleged abuse may have been going on for two or three years.

“We have spoken to 20 children but we just don’t know how many more there are. Some of these children may have been known to each other.

“There appears to be all manner of grooming that has taken place.

“We’re not sure how the victims were being groomed but we’re looking at Facebook, Bebo and the internet”….

…despite pleas for calm, Torbay Lib Dem councillor Jenny Faulkner warned schoolchildren in the area should not go out alone.

“If they are going home they should go straight there. If they’re going to after-school clubs they should go straight there.

“Don’t go about alone – go in groups of twos or threes or fours.

“They should always tell their parents where they’re going so if they’re late the parents know where they are.”

Torbay Mayor Nick Bye was also shocked by the scale of the sex abuse.

He said: “This is the first time I’ve had experience of such a serious matter.

“I’ve already rubber-stamped the costs of the additional teams of social workers working with the victims.”

And horrified parents also spoke of their fears for their children yesterday.

Sharon Houghton, 37, who has three youngsters at different schools in Torbay, said: “It’s hard to grasp what is going on.

“It is obviously very concerning and we have been given very few details about the investigation. I am now thinking I can’t let my kids go out. I want to know where they are at all times. We feel worried and in the dark about what is happening.”

Husband Ray, 58, said: “We have had three letters and I understand they are being sent to schools all over.

“It must be a serious investigation for them to be notifying so many parents. There is no smoke without fire.”

Now let’s just take a brief look at the ‘facts’ presented above in a rational manner.  Those accused of the offences are aged 16 – 19 and the ‘abuse’ was going on for up to 3  years.  That means that the ‘paedophiles’ were aged 13 – 16 when the offences began.  The ‘victims’, according to the reports, were aged 12 – 15.  The victims were all known to the offenders and, as it seems that no pedo story these days is complete without a ‘grooming/Facebook’ angle, the cop happily stresses that the teen boys met, or got to know, the girls through social networking sites.

So what we have here, basically, is not an international ring of 40 year old paedophiles abusing and raping young children, as the headlines and hysteria would warrant, but simply teenage boys meeting slightly younger teenage girls from the same town as themselves on social networking sites and then meeting up with them in real life and forming sexual relationships with them.

The reports state that some of the ‘victims’ may have been raped.  Note that under British feminist law (introduced by NuLabor) a 15 year old boy having consensual sex with a 12 year old girl is guilty of rape (not just ‘statutory rape’ but actual ‘rape’).

It has always been my opinion that paedohysteria is the result of the accidental convergence of a number of contemporary social trends and forces, most of which are fairly blind.  I’ve believed that the main actors are not even consciously aware that they are deliberately stoking the forces of hysteria, let alone possessing any understanding of their true sexual or economic motives.  For example, as readers know, I believe that a primary driving force is the sexual fear and jealousy that middle-aged women feel regarding the availability of nubile teenage girls in a free sexual market.  Another force, which Angry Harry describes particularly well, is the economic and financial interests that are at play in perpetuating abuse hysteria. 

But it was always my belief that these factors all happened to co-incide in a rather blind and unfortunate way.  There was nobody really ‘pulling the strings’, as it were, and consciously orchestrating the entire thing.  The above story has forced me to change my mind. 

Of course, I don’t know the real facts of what happened in this case, I can only go by what the media and the police are telling us.  And it seems to me obvious that from these accounts, nothing more has happened than what is happening in every town and city in the Western world – teens meeting other teens through social networking sites and having sex with each other.  They used to do it via the school disco, or behind the bike shed, now it’s through Facebook.  The media, and the police, have deliberately portrayed this in the manner of a paedophile shock story in response to four recent events that threatened paedohysteria, and all the vested interests that certain powerful groups have in maintaining that modern day witchhunt.   Those events were :

• The Asian grooming gangs scandal.  Although these are also likely greatly exaggerated by the media, the threat stories like these pose is in negating the contemporary (and invented) paedophile stereotype – a white male pervert with an unnatural interest in teenage girls.
• The government’s decision to scrap NuLabor’s controversial paedophile vetting scheme that would have forced every adult in the UK to apply for a ‘I swear I am not a pedo’ liscence before going within 50 miles of a person under 18.  This appeared to be a definate sign that paedohysteria was abating in the UK, and that British adults were finally beginning to behave like responsible adults again by admitting that the hysteria was getting out of hand and that children and society were being harmed as a result.
• The decision by the EU to confirm the right of sex offenders sentanced to a lifetime on the register to appeal to be removed if they can show they are no longer a danger to children.  This provoked utter fury in the media – there is only one thing that approaches paedohysteria in its ability to sell newspapers to the British masses, and that is visceral hatred of Europe.  The most unediffying sight I’ve seen in years was last week witnessing the leader of so-called British ‘liberalism’, Nick Clegg, defiantly asserting that he was reluctant to accept that sex offenders had rights, and that he would do the minimum possible to comply with European law in granting those rights.
• Another EU ruling the week before that had given British prisoners (rapists and paedos) the right to vote.

The Torbay ‘grooming gang’ appears to be nothing but a group of horny young lads consensually fumbling other horny teens.  The way they appear to have been used so obviously as media pawns in order to maintain the sexual and financial interests of powerful groups of adults should shame and sicken every rational person in Britain.

British Premier Cameron

After reducing paedophiles to non-human beings, the write-up then makes clear that what we are talking about are ‘sex tourists’.  Paedophiles = animals = sex tourists.   Pictures of small Asian children walking hand in hand with dirty old Western men illustrate the article.  There can be no arguing with that.  But, as we know, once the emotions are stirred and any possibility of a moral and sane discussion has been precluded, the legislation that results is aimed chiefly at deterring men from paying for sex with prostitutes at all, or even deterring them from picking up any attractive young women in foreign nightclubs and bars, for fear of the consequences if they turn out to have been under 18.  In fact, the article makes this rather explicit :

“That’s a common defence, that these kids are older than what they appear to be because they’re Asian,” says ICE agent Gary Philips. “And if I had a nickel for every time I’ve heard that, I’d probably be a millionaire.”

In the space of a few sentences, and a couple of ridiculously emotive pictures of small children, we’ve gone from paedophiles who pay for sex with infants, to ‘sex tourists’ who mistakenly pick up 17 year old ‘kids’ in bars.

Paedophiles = animals = men who unwittingly have sex with 17 year old ‘kids’.

One of the article’s underlying tones seems to be the proud boasting of reconciliation between America and Cambodia.  Yep, those child protection obsessed Americans may have been napalming your 8 year old kids by the million only a generation ago, but when it comes to hunting down men like dogs, men who commit the crime of ending up in bed with cute 17 year old Asian girls instead of marrying obese, masculine 40 year old American women back home, then Cambodia is now part of Team America.  Now doesn’t that make you feel good?  Can there be a more heartwarming story than that?

No.  It makes me feel sick.  In the most perverted piece of irony in the article, evidently lost upon its writer, we are told that ’Agent Vansak Suos was once a conscripted boy soldier in Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge army’.  Presumably as a sign of the ‘progress’ that Cambodia has made.  This is ironic because the historically absurd idea that 17 year old girls are children, and that any men who pursue them are paedophiles, has taken root worldwide primarily because of the United Nations Declaration upon the Rights of the ‘Child’ - puritanical elements of which were lobbied for by American conservatives in tandem with feminist sexual pressure groups.  However, America remains only one of two countries in the entire world (the other is Somalia) who refused to sign the declaration themselves.  The reason?  Because America was loathe to give up its right to send 16 year old boys out to die as cannon fodder on foreign fields.  As well as putting retarded 16 year old black kids on to death row.

But one final question remains.  Where are the negrophile hunters?  The BBC is predictably silent upon the tens of thousands of wealthy American and European women who flock to the Carribean in order to molest and abuse the ‘big bamboos’ of poverty stricken, illiterate, drug addled Rastafarians.  Black men with the same IQ as the typical 11 year old Asian girl (the average IQ in Jamaica is 72).

I dream of the day when there exists an uncastrated men’s rights movement that is strong enough to stand up for male sexuality.  A movement large enough to spawn sub-groups dedicated to hunting down such female sex tourists and bringing these creatures to justice.  This week, Beatrice Ask, the feminist chief rapist of Sweden, called for stiffer penalties on those caught paying for sex.  To my knowledge, Sweden has the same sex tourist laws that feminists have foisted upon the rest of the Western world.  There must be thousands of Swedish women amongst those obese whordes who fly to the West Indies each year to buy sex with black cock.  Why don’t we hunt these negrophiles down and ensure that they too, must face justice?  Hopefully, at the end of a sex starved lesbian’s strap-on-black-dildo in some tiny rat infested prison cell…

PAEDOPHILIC PLEASANTRY TO COST TAXPAYER £500K

Showing Britain’s Pakistani youth that paedophilia did not need to involve raping, torture, pimping and (as Labourite Jack Straw put it) ‘treating girls like meat, unmarried affluent graphic design businessman and polo player Giles Cross, then 43, fell for an unnameable-for-legal reasons anorexic fifteen- year-old girl whom he met at stables in Cheshire. Soon the pair were on most affectionate terms (he called her Belle, she called him Beau) and one thing led to another over 15 months in Cross’s ‘Ink’n’Paper’ office.

The pair would talk until 5am on Skype while Cross took thousands of ‘screen shot’ pictures of his beloved in her bedroom. Said the girl [17 by the time of the seven-day 2011 trial in Chester] as Cross was jailed for a savage four years (after her parents discovered the liaison) (Daily Telegraph, 15 i, ‘The predatory paedophile at the polo club’; Daily Mail, 15 i):

“We were kissing, touching and hugging each other. Then he took my jeans off and I was just touching him and kissing. I was OK with that and I didn’t tell him to stop or anything. I trusted him, I thought I loved him. We kept it a secret from everyone.” Defending, lawyer Duncan Bold said that when the alleged victim was being taken to the police station for questioning she was screaming and shouting saying she didn’t want to go. Later on in proceedings the alleged victim’s mother confirmed this.

Another healthy-enough example of age-gapped relations emerged as Italian Duce Silvio Berlusconi, 74, found himself hauled into the limelight of the courts for having a pally and possibly paying relationship with gorgeous flaxen-haired, bee-stung-lipped and –bosomed Moroccan-born belly dancer Miss Karima El Mahroug, 17 – who claimed to have been given jewellery and £6K in cash at one of Silvio’s “‘bunga-bunga” orgies ooops parties.

To prosecute this ‘crime,’ Italian taxpayers would have to cough up at least £1M – and much more if Silvio had to be imprisoned, since his business empire and lawyers would run night-and-day appeals to what was left of Italy’s justice system after years of its being broken by the Mafia.

Recently on his blog, Harry named and shamed the feminist appointed as one of the NSPCC’s most senior advisors – professor of ‘child sexual exploitation’ no less. The same woman recently published some extremely ropey feminist ‘research’ proclaiming that women are three times more likely to be arrested for domestic violence than men.

This week the NSPCC leant its weight to a huge public outcry over ZaNuLabor’s plans to force all adults having regular contact with other people’s children to PROVE that they are NOT a paedophile. Failure to do so could have resulted in a 5 year prison sentance. Respected authors such as Philip Pullman and even JK Rowling had already spoken out against the proposals, Pullman calling it ‘toxic to healthy social interaction’.

Clearly, the NSPCC is doing nothing more than jumping on the bandwagon, distancing itself from a massively unpopular law through fear that any association might harm the public donations upon which the lifestyles of its staff depend. In reality, no anti-paedo legislation is made in this country without the guidance of the NSPCC and other children’s charities. The NSPCC would have been advising the government at all stages of the planning of this law – why choose to speak out now?

And while we are on the subject of feminist generated paedo-hysteria – an Italian father was arrested and jailed for kissing his 8 year old daughter on a Brazillian beach. Sadly, it is clear that no country is now free of this corrosive and destructive hysteria. Over the last decade or two, feminist sexual pressure groups (such as the NSPCC) have succeeded in marshalling their resources and lobbied every government on Earth, forced the passing of countless laws and treaties, and in doing so, created new moral norms and rules of inter-generational interaction across all ethnic and cultural boundaries – a quite staggering feat comparable only to the most stunningly efficient military campaign imaginable.

Feminists – that is politically active women, are capable of anything…when their basic sexual and reproductive needs are threatened. And once again, to make perfectly clear, the hysteria generated by feminists over paedophilia and abuse has nothing to do with protecting 8 year old children from being molested by 40 year old men. It is about inflating the definition of paedophilia way beyond its historical usage of representing the perverted sexual attraction for pre-pubescent children. It is about ever increasingly stiffining the penalties for ‘paedophilia’ and child abuse to the point that it becomes an attack on the very idea of man’s inate sexual preference for youth and fertility. It is about broadening the definition of rape and abuse so ridiculously that any woman has the power to ‘punish’ a cheating partner with an accusation.

najat m'jid in kinky leather

And to highlight just how such charities have achieved this remarkable feat, here is my Elizabeth Bathory award for October – the delightful Najat M’jid, Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography for the UN. This week she announced that 750,000 paedos (i.e. men) are online at any given moment hoping to prey evil on YOUR DAUGHTER! Not only that, but there are apparently 4 MILLION websites featuring the sexual exploitation of children, a ‘network’ that makes billons of dollars a year (strange, I read only a few days ago that the police were now going to focus their child porn efforts on p2p networks, as all commercial child porn websites had been successfully shut down). I wonder why the hideous Maala, a Morroccon paedatrician, isn’t spending more effort getting the United Nations to influence the Islamic practices of child brides, female circumcision, 8 year old sucide bombers in the Gazza strip, stoning to death of 16 year old girls for adultory in Iran etc? But no, this modern Elizabeth Bathory would rather victimise 17 year old Lativian beauties posing in panties and bras on webcam. Feminist creatures like this, who trivialise and exploit genuine paedophilia and child sexual abuse out of clear motivations of sexual jealousy and insecurity are wicked beyond belief. They are damaging society, criminilizing ordinary men,and poisning relationships between the sexes and between adults, teenagers and children. They belong in psychiatric wards rather than be free to crusade on behalf of some supposedly higher global morality that in fact emanates from their dried up, unwanted vaginas. They need to be stopped, and the duty to stop them is part of the men’s rights cause.