This week, Google have once again updated their ‘PageRanks’ – an algorithm that awards each website on the internet a mark out of 10 for ‘authority’. These updates occur once every 6 months or so, and are based upon factors such as the number of other quality and relevant sites that are linking in to yours. A high Google PageRank is important because it affects your website’s position within their search results.
Two men’s rights sites now appear to have achieved an impressive rank of 5 – AngryHarry.com and The-Spearhead.com A PageRank of 5 is very good, and as far as I know had not been achieved by any men’s rights site previously (I think last week Angry Harry had a rank of 3, and The Spearhead one of 4).
One of the things that scores heavily towards PageRank is a link from a highly authoritative website such as a leading news outlet. For that reason, it’s possible that Paul Elam’s AVoiceForMen.com could reach a rank of 6 when the next update occurs, on account of being linked to by the New York Times. If that happens, it will mean that a men’s rights site will have achieved Google parity with Feministing.com, the leading dedicated feminist website.
My own little perverted and extremist corner of the men’s rights blogosphere did boast a dizzy rank of 4 only a few months ago, but for some reason crashed back down to 1 overnight. This occured shortly after my YouTube account was banned (Google, of course, owns YouTube). It is likely that theantifeminist.com was associated by Google with my YouTube account, and therefore was penalised when my account was ‘terminated’. A word of warning, therefore, to those men’s rights bloggers who are also on YouTube – if you have recieved a community guideline warning, then it is probably prudent to delete your YouTube account. Piss off the Google Monster, and you effectively find yourself banned from the interweb.
A final word of advice. When linking to feminist sites, always be sure to add rel=”nofollow” within the html link tag. This prevents your PageRank ‘linkjuice’ from being passed on to the site of your enemy.
*Edit : I did of course forget MensNewsDaily.com, which I presume would have, and did already have, a page ranking of 5 – because of the fact that Google trusts it as a news source. At the moment it’s not showing in my browser so I can’t check. But, in any case, MND is a little different in that it is a news hub rather than a blog.
It’s always heartening when another MRA calls for an initiative to turn words into political action. It’s even more heartening when it’s the great Bernard Chapin :
Why Feminists Really Hate Pornography. Thanks to loyal reader EvilWhiteMale for pointing me to this:
TheAntiFeminist.com is growing again.
After having to re-install my site several months ago (and losing most of the archives in the process), traffic took a dive. We seem to be on the rise again now, as you can see from the stats table above. Thanks to all my loyal readers for sticking around! This site is now also behind only Wikipedia in Google search results for both ‘anti-feminism’ and ‘anti-feminist’. Thanks to all the websites that link here. If you run a blog in anyway connected to anti-feminist issues and would like to exchange links then please e-mail me at schopenbecq (at) yahoo (dot) co (dot) uk
Ministers have vowed to press ahead with plans to give anonymity to men accused of rape despite a cross-party campaign led by a new Tory MP.
Members from all sides of the House said the Coalition’s plans not to name men until they are charged would deter victims from coming forward to the police.
But junior justice minister Crispin Blunt yesterday confirmed he was pressing ahead with the controversial proposals, which were imposed on the Tories by the Lib Dems as part of the coalition agreement.
Louise Bagshawe, a successful chick-lit author who became a Tory MP at the last election, told the Commons that by ‘ singling out rape in this way ministers are sending a negative signal about women and those who accuse men of rape’.
The attempts by the Liberal Democrats to give men accused of rape anonymity are looking increasingly fragile. The rebellion, led by a CONSERVATIVE female MP tells us a lot about female politics…as well as confirming Arthur Schopenhauer’s ‘misogynistic’ observation that ‘the fundamental defect of a woman is a lack of a sense of justice’.
Whether they are representatives of ‘the left’ or ‘the right’, female politicians invariably speak for the interests of women. On this issue, only one question is relevant for them. Will granting anonymity to men accused of rape increase female sexual power, or decrease it? No brainer. It will decrease it, and therefore every woman MP, no matter what supposed party political allegiance, will fight against it. Men’s rights? Human rights?…pffffff.
And again, to the deluded majority of the men’s rights movement who assume that our cause is synonymous with conservatism – this bill (to grant men anonymity) is being re-introduced by the liberals. When British women were granted anonymity in rape trials several decades ago, the accused men were given the same protection. It was the CONSERVATIVE party who changed this in 1982, allowing hundreds of men’s lives to be ruined by false allegations in the years since.
As you would expect, the False Rape Society is doing an excellent job in covering developments in what might turn out to be a defining moment for the future of men’s rights.
If you live in the UK, please write to (e-mail) your MP stating the case for anonymity for accused men : Write to Them
I’ve read a few anti-feminist books, and I think I’m aware of the existance of most of the few that I haven’t yet got round to, but this one has somehow slipped under my radar. Until, that is, a loyal reader by the name of ‘Highwayman’ informed me of it in a comment left here a few days ago. I can only think that the reasons it doesn’t get mentioned a lot in the MRM community are similar to the relative neglect of Neil Lyndon’s classic ‘No More Sex War’ :
It’s by a British author.
It’s pro sex (or at least against the feminist rape of male sexuality).
The author has probably never had a wet dream involving Sarah Palin.
Anyway, here’s the Highlander’s excellent comments on the book – comments that prompted me to order it from Amazon the same night and have left me drooling in anticipation at reading one of those rare books that might affect my entire intellectual landscape. Hopefully it lives up to my expectations and I’ll try to put up a review here very soon.
I highly recommend reading the chapter on prostitution in Steve Moxon’s book The Woman Racket. He really tears into the arguments that feminists and others try to use to suppress prostitution and to punish the men who patron sex care workers.
His theory as to what motivates people to oppose men patroning prostitutes is interesting. He belives it is caused by the “cheater detection mechanism” whereby people become outraged by what they PERCEIVE is a lower status male having access to females that his position in the dominance hierachy would not allow him to if he were not to patron prostitutes. This could explain why some men are also opposed to men seeing sex care workers because they might fear that if lower status males can “cheat the system” then perhaps the entire dominance heirarchy could be undermined. Of course it could also be that some men oppose the patronage of sex care workers because they believe that a deity commands them to or because they are trying to suck it up to women too.
BTW according to research men who patron sex care workers come from all varieties of socio-economic backgrounds and even if some unattractive or “lower status” men are able to find some sexual fulfillment through patroning sex care workers…good for them I say!
Bernard Chapin, author of one of the classic anti-feminist works himself, has compiled this excellent Men’s Rights Book List
Also check out this classic old skool Chapin’s Inferno :
Brock Lesnar and Kurt Angle Fight Over Emma Watson
You see old femiwhores – you could introduce the death penalty for glancing in the street at a girl under 21 and castrated bitch MRAs might be the first to applaud you. But you know what? Ultra alpha males like Brock and Kurt would still fight over who caught the pretty jailbait’s eye.
Bernard Chapin has served up another splendily thought provoking video at Chapin’s inferno. Bernard makes clear that any use of violence or even aggressive behaviour on the part of MRA’s would be counter-productive to the cause and simply play into the hands of feminists who wish to portray men, or at least those who criticise feminism, as violent brutes.
Of course, violence is being committed upon men worldwide through the injustices of feminism on a massive and horrendous scale. Despite this, I would agree almost entirely with Bernard’s sentiments in this video. It’s important to remember that the mens’ rights movement is still in a very nascent and fragile form. If just a single anti-feminist or MRA was convicted of politically motivated violence then it would possibly derail and bring about the abortion of our movement before it had even really begun it’s long and (hopefully) productive life…and you know how feminists love to do things like that.
We still retain the ability to fight the emotional violence of feminists with the cool, rational arms of plain words and argument. Of course, that might not continue indefinitely – in fact it surely won’t. Feminist politicians in the UK and Europe have already begun drafting the broadening of hate speech laws to include any criticism of women and of feminism. What happens when saying blindingly obvious truth’s such as ‘men will always prefer younger women to older women because older women can’t reproduce’ gets you 6 months of prison rape time as a ‘sex offender’?
I’m probably too mild mannered and, perhaps, cowardly to ever even consider using violence as a political means, even if I were to condone the use of violence (which here and presently I am not doing). As I have argued, any ‘resistance’ to feminism is probably futile in that feminism is being driven by blind and brutal forces of nature that the human animal can never really have any control over. As far as the situation in Europe is concerned, any violent resistance is doubly pointless because sooner or later, in a sense, Islamic radical groups will do our work for us. And to any idiot who thinks I am here condoning what might or might not happen down the road in our continent, I am not. No more than any of the thousands or millions of clear sighted people were ‘condoning’ anything when they observed that the invasion of Iraq would increase the likelihood of Islamic terrorism occuring in the UK. And when I say ‘do our work for us’, I mean equally ‘do the work of women for them’. Regular readers of this blog will be aware I believe that feminism is akin to being the twin sister of Islam. Rather than being polar opposites, as many unthinkingly assume, Islam and feminism have a great deal in common. Maybe in 20 years time Muslim radicals will be targeting feminists in Europe just as they do in Afghanistan or parts of Iraq and Nigeria. But the Islamic radical state that these people aspire too will never represent the defeat of feminism, but rather the removal of the need for feminism. The only objective that Islamic terrorism against feminism could possibly achieve is simply the bringing forward of the day that the European femi-nazi state inevitably merges and melts into an Islamic theocratic state.
For my part, I write this blog as a means of self-expression, to keep sane, and to have the personal satisfaction of stating (and spreading) the truth about feminism while it remains possible to do so.
