This story might have popped up in r/mensrights and elsewhere a few weeks ago, so apologies if you have already seen it :
‘Big Sister’ names men trying to buy prostitutes in Iceland
A new underground movement called “Stóra systir” (Big Sister in Icelandic) has handed over a list to the Reykjavík Police of men who wanted to buy the services of prostitutes through various websites and classified ads offering “massages” in daily newspaper, Fréttabladid.
Iceland passed a law in 2009 which made the purchase of sex illegal.
The group held a press conference in Reykjavík this week – its spokespeople wearing cloaks, hoods and masks to remain anonymous – stating its intention was to ensure that the laws on prostitution were applied by police.
The group decided to take matters into its own hands after police authorities claimed it had neither the funds nor the manpower to fight prostitution which, the group stated, is clearly thriving in Iceland despite being illegal.
The Big Sisters said the list handed to police was the result of three weeks of investigative work.
Here is a photo of the (thankfully) masked feminist vigilantes posing at the ‘press conference’ they held – note the resemblance to burqa clad muslim women :
But it’s not just Big Sister that is spying on men who bring down the market value of the average vagina. Little Brother is at it too :
‘Superheroes’ win praise, criticism for online vigilante justice
Four young Chilliwack men who dressed as superheroes to confront potential sex offenders have drawn public kudos but are being criticized by police, who say crime-fighting should be left to the proper authorities.
Police say the vigilantes — two are 17, one is 18 and one is 20 — put themselves in danger by posing online as underage girls to lure men for sexual encounters, only to confront the men publicly dressed as Batman and the Flash. The encounters were videotaped and posted in recent weeks on YouTube, under the title To Troll a Predator.
Police have spoken to the young men and their parents, said Cpl. Tammy Hollingsworth, spokeswoman for the Upper Fraser Valley RCMP, Wednesday.
“Our main concern is their personal safety,” she said. “Those kids told investigators they made a big mistake.”
The-Spearhead’s W.F.Price devoted an article to this last week :
Of course, it’s a bad idea to meet underage girls online, but in most of these stings it is the “girls” who are taking the initiative, which is entrapment. It really isn’t very hard to find men willing to take the bait when sexually mature (i.e. post-pubescent) females offer sex, so there’s nothing heroic about luring guys in such a manner. It’s actually a pretty lousy thing to do, and likely only encourages those who are not caught to make a go of it. It’s akin to offering drinks to former alcoholics.
If you read the article, and especially the comments underneath, then you can have little doubt that we’ve ‘won’ the argument – that middle-aged feminists imposing self-interested draconian laws and punishments on men who are attracted to post-pubescent females is indeed a men’s rights issue. Congratulations to all those (handful) who were brave enough to stand firm. Once more, the present men’s rights/anti-feminist movement can unashamedly and proudly trace its historical lineage all the way back to the likes of Ernest Belfort Bax and Arthur Schopenhaur.
Of course, these teen vigilante heroes are just little cock blockers who are resentful at a relative handful of middle-aged men trying to ‘steal’ their pussy. One comment left underneath the Spearhead article is illuminating and needs highlighting, left by a teenage MRA :
Aaaaand what do you expect young men to do while older men are taking all their women? Sit there with their thumbs up their butts?
This question has been addressed here in the comments section, and it’s not that I don’t have any sympathy with it, and nor do I particularly blame the teenage vigilantes who are only able to do what they are doing because of feminist unjust laws. But how far would you take the logic of this young MRA? Would it be o.k. for men in their twenties to side with middle-aged feminists in making it illegal for men to choose partners more than 5 years younger than themselves, and to excuse any subsequent vigilante action from young men? Of course not, and hopefully any MRA older than 16 would have the maturity to see that.
And I don’t think that ‘scarcity of pussy’ should be a problem in a truly free sexual market, at least if it wasn’t for female hypergamy. In such a society, most people would be having open sexual relationships, and prostitution, including teenage prostitution, would be easily and openly accessible. The young boys might have a point if older men were marrying their female teenage peers and keeping them all to themselves, but that would hardly be the reality in a society sufficiently sexually free to rid itself of statutory rape laws. In short, there would be plenty enough premium teenage pussy available to keep everybody happy (except middle-aged women). And at the worst, it would be a matter of ‘waiting your turn’.
“Clap Your Hands and They Will Run Screaming Into the Desert”
The above is a (mis)quote that I vaguely remember attributed to an Israeli general after the combined Arab armies had suffered yet another humiliating spanking. Vigilantism isn’t now confined to the guardians of the female vagina, and men’s rights activists are rapidly becoming pretty skilled at it as well.
The Israeli general’s words seem to me to be increasingly applicable to feminists, as I follow the devastating impact that the simple social shaming of Register-Her.com has had upon certain individuals, as well as the humiliating and pathetic mencallmethings – a Twitter set up by femi-nazis for other femi-nazis to bitch about upsetting e-mails they recieve from angry pissed off men they are victimising or trying to criminilise for simply having a dick.
I’ve always made it clear that I am firmly of the belief that while the legal and democratic route to change things and to resist feminist evil exists, then the men’s rights movement should fully commit to it. I do not approve of threatening e-mails and the like. I know how these feminists feel. I get about 2 or 3 comments left here every day calling for me to be tortured or executed – most of them leaving their ips behind, and many of them from feminist bloggers (all of which have been collected for future reference).
But I have to say this – if feminists can’t handle a few nasty e-mails now and again, I’d suggest you leave the fight right now and pursue a different means of earning money and protecting the market value of your aging vagina. Because I can only see it getting a lot worse, the more you victimise men and the more we, as a movement, wake other men up to what you are doing to them. And even if the men’s rights movement stays on a purely legal and peaceful path, that’s hardly going to remain the case for muslim radicals, who (to some extent misguidedly) see you as the enemy.
And, as I have stated here before, to interpret this tragic prediction as something that bears any resemblance to ‘inciting violence’ is as stupid as saying that those pundits who correctly feared that the illegal invasion of Iraq would lead to terrorist atrocities in London, were themselves guilty of ‘inciting terrorism’.
Fortunately, the success of legal activism such as Register-Her.com has shown that the illegal variety cannot be justified – at least until such time as the feminists try to block free speech and criticism (‘hate laws’ and the like).
All of these issues have come into sharp relief over the last few days with the exposure of a shocking Swedish feminist made video showing the staged murder of an apparently random man by followers of the SCUM manifesto.
One of my readers posted a link to the video last week, before it had become known in the English speaking men’s rights sphere. I quickly did some research and almost immediately found the names of those responsible for the video. I considered posting an article that same day, but to be honest, ‘bottled out’, and instead simply posted the video to r/mensrights, where of course, it generated a huge reaction.
I knew that the video would be quickly taken up by other and bigger guns anyway. In fact, the moment I watched the video, I was certain that a defining moment for the men’s rights movement was about to come, and it does appear that this may be the case after AVoiceForMen offered a $1,000 bounty on providing the names of the feminists involved.
My reluctance to be the first English speaking men’s rights blogger to cover this was that I wasn’t quite sure, despite a little initial research, as to what the exact background to the video was. There was no doubt that uploading such a video was a vile act, no matter what the context, even it may have been an attempt at satire and even the mocking of feminazis. But given that these may have been daft 16 year olds making a clumsy attempt to satirise the excesses of femi-nazism (it initally appeared possible to me), I decided to hold back.
However, it does seem to be becoming clear that this was a video made by feminists who are most definately sympathetic to the SCUM manifesto – a feminist manifesto that called for the extermination of men and that was written by a woman who would later attempt to murder two men. This isn’t satirising femi-nazis, or even the actual product of ‘femi-nazis’. This video is what passes as mainstream morality, something that is fit to brainwash high-school kids with, in the feminist hell that is Sweden today.
There is no excuse for this video, and I have no sympathy if the evil little feminists behind it suffer a few ‘Google problems’ for the rest of their lives. To try to excuse this video, as a certain male feminist is doing, is as evil as excusing a white nationalist YouTube video that showed skinheads killing a random black man on the grounds that it is simply ‘staged art’, akin to Shakespeare!