‘Sexualised Pictures of Teenage Girls’

Most of you will probably have heard of the decision by Reddit to ban all of its infamous ‘Jailbait’ sub-reddits – which apparently had been devoted to the sharing of ‘sexualised’ pictures of clothed teenagers in bikinis and such like.  Most men’s rights supporters will have become aware because Adrian Chen, of Gawker.com, has decided to link this issue to his wish to see r/mensrights shut down.

This has immediately put r/mensrights back on the defensive, with many MRAs there fiercely proclaiming that the only context in which ‘child porn’ and ‘paedophilia’ are men’s rights issues is in the cases of double standards in sentencing.

Of course, it’s pointed out quite correctly how odd it is that Adrien Chen want’s men’s rights banned next, instead of any of the clearly awful reddits still out there such as r/beatingwomen or r/nigger.  In fact, it’s odd enough that legal (at least in America) pictures of clothed teenagers should warrant such attention ahead of such other subreddits.  I’ve even read that there is a reddit devoted to pictures of dead babies…well I guess it’s no surprise that feminists and ‘progressive liberals’ would be more enraged at pictures of 17 year old ‘children’ in bikinis than creatures taking pride in looking at pictures of murdered babies.

In fact, it’s no surprise that feminists see pictures of jailbait and talk of men’s rights to be on the same level.  Both, when it comes down to it, threaten to weaken the sexual value of women in a free sexual market.  Instead of being cowards again, the men’s rights community should realise that it is the very power that the ‘child porn/paedophile’ hysterias give feminists and their allies over men that make it such an imperative to continue to question the underlying basis of those hysterias.

Personally, I wouldn’t be totally saddened to see the demise of reddit/r/mensrights.  Yes, it’s a highly useful source of links and news pertaining to men’s rights issues, but the inherent nature of reddit itself means that the mens’ rights subreddit will always be vulnerable to false flag attacks and manipulation from other self-interested groups.  The level of discussion there is typically absolutely dreadful – near imbecilic.  To try to contribute even intermittently is to be dragged into a femi-troll hell.  You end up arguing a point, usually of the nature – ‘is this really a men’s rights issue?’ – with somebody who is ostensibly also an MRA, then finally click on ‘his’ comment history and find that you’ve wasted an hour of your life discussing with somebody who has either never commented about men’s rights before, is a diaper wearing fetishist, or even a feminist troll.  And this is all made worse by the poor moderation (improved since the imbecile Kloo2Yoo left and was replaced by Annarchist, but still having to suffer from the mangina like moderation of feminist supporting Ignoratisloyla).

The ‘advantage’ and appeal of Reddit lies in it’s community ‘upvoting’ system.  But for a nascent, and still rather small political movement like men’s rights, this is its very weakness in terms of the potential it gives our cause to be manipulated by larger groups – such as feminists – as well as diluted by casual wanderers whose multiple accounts make up the majority of the 30,000+ ‘men’s rights supporters’ there (impressive only on paper).  I still get far more visitors to this site coming from a link by InMalaFide than I do from r/mensrights.  And if people feel the need for a reddit type service that cannot be manipulated or false flagged then I suggest they support Ferdinand Bardemu’s InBonaFide.

But back to the jailbait issue.  Note the phrase ‘sexualised pictures’.  What we’re talking about here is ‘jailbait‘.  Although certain manginas are most often found boasting of their lack of ability to distinguish between pre-pubescent sexless children and hormone flushed large breasted ‘jailbait’, they seem to have found a way of exploiting the shock value of a ‘preteen’ reddit in this instance.  But what I’m talking about here is ‘jailbait’ – clothed pictures of staggeringly attractive sexual beings that according to feminists are ‘sexualised’ and have become defined as child porn. Err, no, you can de-sexualise teenage post-pubescent girls, you can’t ‘sexualise’ them.  These pictures might be sexual – any picture of an attractive 15 year old girl in a bikini is sexual to a healthy man – but they are not ‘sexualised’.  Continue creating law after law that criminalise normal male sexuality in order to remove even images of such breathtakingly beautiful girls from the sexual market – but stop rationalizing your bitterness and jealousy by pretending that these post-pubescent teenagers are being ‘sexualised’.

When a man tells a young woman to stop dressing in public in a sexual manner, lest it increases the chances that they are sexually assualted, riots quickly ensue, and young slut walkers, most of whom are barely ‘adults’ themselves, go out of their way to exercise their feminist right to dress provocatively.

When women, or indeed, when a male feminist like Adrian Chen, tells 15, 16, 17 year old ‘children’ that any pictures of their even clothed bodies are obscene and pornographic, likely to lead to a lifetime of regret, shame, and bullying, then it’s just another divinely revealed secular truth, and any heretic like me who questions it is a sick bag pedo.

One of my readers posted an interesting link to the case of a 14 year old girl who became an ‘internet sex symbol’ after her Facebook photos were hacked into.  The invasion of privacy involved is highly unethical, of course, but what the girl herself has to say about how the matter ‘ruined her life’ is illuminating :

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060065/Angie-Varona-Most-Googled-teen-tears-risqu-photos-ruined-life.html

It was a decision that she said ‘has ruined her life’.

‘When you’re 14 you don’t realise that the things you do really do matter at that point,’ she said in an interview on ABC News’ Nightline.

‘No one ever thinks that, ‘yeah, I’m going to take these pictures and it’s going to end up all over the Internet.’ You just do it for yourself.’

She was repeatedly called names and a ‘porn star’ at her high school after the photos spread online, from appearing in porn sites to popping up in advertisements.

Miss Varona thought the unwanted attention would eventually come to an end, but the problem has only worsened, she said.

A recent Google search of ‘Angie Varona’ drew almost 65,000 images.

There are also numerous unauthorised Facebook profiles, Twitter accounts and YouTube channels, all claiming to be Angie — one Facebook fan page has more than 41,000 likes. 

‘[People were] telling me that I deserve everything that’s going to come for me, that they’re going to rape me when they see me because I want it and because I ask for it,’ she said.

I would confidently predict that most of the bullying, and likely the threats to kill her, came from her less attractive female peers.  Again, this is being used as a feminist rationalisation as to why beautiful teenage girls should not post pictures of themselves in bikinis or revealing poses online – because they will be slut shamed by their peers, or because it might increase the risk of themselves being sexually assaulted or harassed.  Yet overweight pug ugly feminist ‘slut walkers’ of 18 and 19 can turn the ‘right to be a slut in public’ into a mass political protest.

I should add that I use the word ‘slut’ in a non-judgemental manner.  The male instinct to slut shame, whilst having a sound evolutionary basis, should be outdated so long as fathers have a right to paternity testing and the right not to support a child who isn’t their own.  Personally, I think the men who are into slut shaming, whether of teenage girls or women, are scum – particularly the ones who are happy to bang ‘sluts’ themselves given the opportunity.  But the nauseating fact is, feminists are only too happy to tap into this unwholesome feature of male sexual psychology when it suits their purpose of de-sexualising teenage girls.

Of course, 14 year olds are a little less mature than 18 or 19 year olds, and to a degree less able to foresee the consequences of their actions.  The gap is hardly wide enough to justify the discrepancy, however – the ‘ right to be a slut’.  And the same principle applies – if it is society’s fault for slut walkers being unable to express themselves sexually, then why shouldn’t 14 year old post-pubescent females be able to post pictures of themselves online without fear of bullying – something which the thinly disguised child slut shaming of feminists and Adrian Chen actually encourages?

Because ‘pedos’ jack off to such pictures?  Aww, a beautiful teen posts sexy pictures of herself online and surprise, surprise, it’s not just 17 year old Justin Bieber look-alikes that click on them when they show up at the top of Google image search.  And what harm is done exactly by a ‘dirty old man’ being aroused by a picture of a fertile young female who ticks all the boxes – youthful skin, pert firm breasts etc.?  If a young girl is taught to despise older people (men) so much that she is somehow traumatised by the thought that an old lonely wrinkly might be spending a few minutes in bliss just thinking about her perfect body that he can never have outside of his imagination, then that is simply a problem for our not so civilised and progressive society – the first (and last) civilisation in history to turn the hatred of the old into the basis of social morality.

Personally, I’m somewhat pleased that these subreddits were removed – not that I visited them, or ‘researched’ them myself anyway – I’m far too aware of crazy feminist laws to do that.  Whether or not they are legal or illegal in the USA, they are now illegal in most of the rest of the world, thanks to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Middle Aged Feminist Hags the Child.  Removing such content makes it a little less likely for an ordinary Brit, a Canadian, or an Australian male that their government will have the power to break into their homes at 2 in the morning and seize them as a subhuman pervert.  In this regard, the police forces of these countries are the biggest losers in Reddit’s decision.

Of course, as has been pointed out here before, thanks to the sick world of psychotically jealous feminists, pictures of ‘sexualised’ anime characters who look under 18 are considered just as illegal, and just as much defined as child porn, as are pictures of real jailbait teenagers in bikinis.  Odd then, that the forum – SomethingAwful.com – which apparently led the campaign to have the jailbait reddits removed as child porn is apparently a hotbed of anime images and videos.

I was also struck by the following post by ‘BoggiDWurms’ on the *site of a professional male feminist, crowing over the decision to close down the ‘child porn’ reddits :

hate child porn love child porn

The anime girl certainly looks under 18, and if she was real she’d likely be stoned to death in a jiffy if found walking the streets of Taliban controlled Afghanistan like that.

The other ironic thing about that post and use of video, totally lost on the self-rationalising ugly aging cretins who frequent that site, is that Beethoven – whilst something of an idealistic mangina in his misguided support for the proto-feminist movements of the day (of which his opera ‘Fidelio’ is an example) – was probably an ‘ephebophile’ (if such a category does exist), or in their progressive language – a pedo.

I remember reading a biography of the great composer in which a contemporary is quoted as describing how, as a twenty something, Beethoven would wander around the main square of his hometown Bonn, looking bashful and love stricken at every pretty young teenage girl who caught his eye.  It is thought that Beethoven, who never married and who seems to have had a rabid dislike of forming any committed sexual relationship, composed some of his greatest works inspired by the beauty of the upper-class teenage pupils who he was paid to give music lessons to,  and who he often and invariably fell in love with – including the Moonlight Sonata, perhaps the most romantic and beautiful piece of of all – being dedicated to a 16 year old girl (remember too that in this period girls began puberty a little later than the present and historical norm).  It is also thought that the ‘Elise’ of his famous bagatelle – ‘Für Elise‘ – refers to a Viennese slang word of the time for ‘slutty’ young teenage girls.

Like his near contemporary Schopenhauer, Beethoven would likely have satisfied his raging sexual lusts with the young adolescent serving girls who were the norm in well-to-do European households at the time.

It is somewhat sobering to think that, thanks to feminist laws, in prisons around the world, there are human beings as sensitive and creative as Beethoven being raped and beaten every day as subhuman animals for simply looking at pictures, in the privacy of their own homes, of ‘sexualised’ teenage girls.  It is an even more disturbing thought that ‘progressive’ 21st century civilisation, which justifies the naturalness of homosexuality on the basis that some penguins have been observed to be ‘homosexual’, will not even allow a sensible debate as to whether a serious crime against male sexuality, if not humanity itself, is being committed.

Selena Gomez breaks down describing the threats and bullying she gets from other jealous female teenagers – of course, these ugly girls then go on to become purely objective ugly women, who create laws and define paedophilia purely on the basis of the interests of ‘children’, it being purely co-incidental that such laws also raise their own small and diminishing sexual market value.  And shouldn’t Selena be more upset and traumatised by the thought that lonely old men might find ‘sexualised’ pictures of her stimulating?

*I never have and never will link to that disgusting site, in doing so giving it page ranking with Google.  On that one thread alone, I saw :

1/ feminists declaring that they have ‘no problem’ with minors being prosecuted for uploading sexy pics of each other (notice that 16 year old girls are children in the context of ‘paedophilia’, but simply ‘minors’ when discussing whether feminists can have them prosecuted ‘for their own protection’).

2/ a feminist declaring that ‘they are armed and ready’ for men’s rights supporters.  Needless to say, if I approved a comment like that here from a men’s rights supporter….

3/ an aging feminist invoking voodoo science and declaring that men who look at a picture of a 17 year old ‘child’ in a bikini are ‘stealing’ her sexuality – something akin to the primitive beliefs of African tribes who, never having seen a camera before, believed that their souls were being stolen when photographed for the first time.  Also, again, something very like the medieval Christian and present day Muslim view of the importance of a teenage daughter’s virginity.  Muslim fathers would honour kill their teenage ‘sluts’.  Feminists are a little more sophisticated, and impose voodoo victim science on the poor girls.

Anna Kournikova and the Golden Age of Tennis Jailbait

Watching the Wimbledon men’s semi-finals in 3D a couple of days ago was a thrilling, eye-popping experience. And not just because of the cute ball girls! Before play began, they also showed highlights of 17 year old Maria Shaparova grunting her lithe young body to the Wimbledon title in 2004. It made me realise the absence of cute jailbait tennis stars at this or any other recent tournament. Long gone are the days when one half of the French nation fell madly in love with a 15 year old Anna Kournikova back in 1997, the Russian sweetheart who then went on to send millions of British men’s pulses racing a month later at Wimbledon, having just celebrated her 16th birthday in between tournaments. Talk about barely legal!

Here’s a classic YouTube clip of Anna in action at that 1997 Wimbledon tournament :

What’s striking about Anna’s sex goddess status, is not just that it occured when she was 15/16 (this was obviously a couple of years before feminists inflated the concept of paedophilia), but that she had a remarkably childish face. There’s a YouTube video of her playing the pretty Martina Hingis when they were both 13 in the Wimbledon Junior tournament, but whereas Martina Hingis is clearly flowering into an adorable young lady, Kournikova looks so young and pre-pubescent that I won’t even link to it.

In fact, she still looked like a teenager when she was well into her twenties :

anna-kournikova-2

Whilst still aged only 16, Anna began dating the 30 year old Ice Hockey player Sergei Fedorov. As paedophilia had still not been invented in Europe at the time, this didn’t even raise a whisper over here, aside from shattering the dreams of around 300 million red-blooded men. But in the USA, a feminist threatened to have Sergei prosecuted for statutory rape if he shared the same hotel room as Anna whilst she competed at the US Open.

Meanwhile, here’s Michael Llodra, the world’s last serve and volleyer, ‘accidently’ crashing into a ball girl. New balls please!

The Roman Ideal Woman

For the Roman male, the ideal woman would be a buxom 16 year old with ‘skin as white as wax, sparkling eyes, sweet breath, lustrous dark or auburn hair’ – no blondes or redheads – ‘a scented, sensuous, lissom body and a shaved clitoris, glowing like a pearl’. 

Taken from ‘Sex Lives of the Roman Emperors – Nigel Cawthorne’ (entertaining read).

So male sexuality hasn’t changed much in 2,000 years then.

Two years too late with this one, but it’s still funny if  you haven’t seen it before :

And, yes, you can now legally get your hands on her :

Finally Miley

First article posted on InMalaFide.com : The History of Feminism as a Sexual Trade Union Thanks to Ferdinand for publishing it (and as a featured post).

Problems with the comment system – apologies to anybody who has posted a comment only to find that it ‘disappeared’ as soon as you pressed submit. I’ve always had a lot of spam bot comments (viagra, penis pills, and the like ) so I had to set the spam filter higher. The last couple of days I appear to have come under a veritable spam attack, and have been recieving up to 20 such spam comments every hour. I presume this is the work of Mikee USA, a feminist troll who is clearly seeking to make impossible any rational discussion of male sexuality. Either that or he is a psychopath who is punishing me for being the only MRA who was prepared to give him a chance. Obviously it is a nightmare having to moderate such levels of spam, so I’ve finally upgraded to a new spam filter, which hopefully will do the trick, especially as I’ll be on holiday soon.

Please don’t stop leaving comments. For a site as small and ‘fringe’ as mine, I realise I am very lucky to have such a number of highly intelligent and insightful readers prepared to contribute. Please continue to do so!

Kristina Semenovskaya Levi Spaceman Ad 1995

In the future, the sexual trade union has been crushed, at least in outer space… according to the following successful Levi Spaceman advert that appeared back in 1995, anyway (6 weeks and 2 days before paedohysteria swept the world and men suddenly realised that perfect skin, hips and waist were never up to much…and never had been, or are you a sick f***** nonce or sumfink?) :

The space girl in the video is Kristina Semenovskaya, who presumably was 15 or 16 at the time, given that she was born in 1979. The massively popular ad also gave Babylon Zoo their one hit wonder – ‘Spaceman‘.

Joking aside, as I’ve argued here previously, in the future, most women will choose to look like this girl i.e. a perfect 16 year old teen.  And when science gives them that capability, through stem cell facelifts, nano-technology, virtual surrogates etc, then the sexual trade union becomes pointless.  Although, as Michel Houellebecq would point out, nature will then only find tortuous new methods of sexual competition.

Without the Make-Up – Peak Reproductive Value

The two photos below are of the same ‘beautiful’ 26 year old American singer Katy Perry.  In one of these photos, she is without her make-up.  Can you spot which one it is?

Katy Perry Make UpKaty Perry Without Make Up

Late news, btw, you may have come across this story 2 months ago, but it was one of those posts I forgot to make.  I remembered it again yesterday when I was visiting my local swimming baths and was reminded once more of how plain and ordinary women in their mid twenties tend to be without their make up and hair-styling.  Really, the brood mares over at MumsNet may deny it, but all women past 21 exist as sexual fakes, forever trying to trick men into believing that they are still peak reproductive value teenage girls.  This is what the multi-billion dollar cosmetics industry amounts to.  It is also the psycho-sexual motivation that drives forward feminism in a secular free sexual market society.

I myself, however, a man in his late thirties, was very much objectified and commodified by the eyes of the opposite sex yesterday, when an entire group of public schoolgirls aged 14 or 15, watching from the gallery, wolf-whistled and leered at my creatine enhanced body as I emerged from the water at the end of my 40 lengths. It felt like the girls of St Trinians were raping me with their eyes, hockey sticks raised should I dare to resist.  I’m sure I heard one pretty American girl amongst them shout something that I cannot even re-print here, for fear that I might offend my reader’s sensibilities.  Suffice to say, I have never felt so humiliated and degraded in my entire life, I told myself, as I took a cold shower to cleanse myself of the emotional dirt and shame inflicted upon my being.  ‘There really is no need to be jealous’, I felt like telling a pair of mid-twentied frumps, leaning against the side of the pool, alternating their dagger stares between myself and the posh jailbaits. ‘This is probably going to scar me for life’.

Meanwhile, a reader has submitted a terrifically valuable resource to add to my Peak Female Sexual Attractiveness essay.  A graph created by (or based upon the theory of) the esteemed David Buss that has been taken from the book ‘Animal Behaviour : Mechanism, Development, Ecology, and Evolution’:

peak reproductive value buss

The chart shows the estimated reproductive value of females throughout their lifetime.  As you can see, the peak ages are between 14 and 17 or 18.  Now of course, you’ve read that a woman’s ‘peak fertility’ is somewhere in her early twenties.  That has little relevance at all to what evolutionary theory would predict men to find most attractive.  To think that it does is to confuse peak fertility (the age of a female at which it is in her maximum interests to be having sex with a man) with peak reproductive value (the age of a female at which it is in the man’s maximum interests to be having sex with her).  The two are different things.  You can also see from the graph that after reaching utmost reproductive value at around the age of 16 or 17, the graph line quickly starts to plummet.  Feminism is largely the historical attempt, through legislative co-ercion and shaming language, to artificially shift the curve of that graph eastwards.  Feminists can no more achieve that goal through these brutal means than Pol Pot could remove inequality by wiping out half of his population.

British women MPs resist anonymity for falsely accused

Ministers have vowed to press ahead with plans to give anonymity to men accused of rape despite a cross-party campaign led by a new Tory MP.

Members from all sides of the House said the Coalition’s plans not to name men until they are charged would deter victims from coming forward to the police.

But junior justice minister Crispin Blunt yesterday confirmed he was pressing ahead with the controversial proposals, which were imposed on the Tories by the Lib Dems as part of the coalition agreement.

Louise Bagshawe, a successful chick-lit author who became a Tory MP at the last election, told the Commons that by ‘ singling out rape in this way ministers are sending a negative signal about women and those who accuse men of rape’.

SOURCE: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1293169/MP-Louise-Bagshawe-leads-rebellion-anonymity-rape-defendants.html#ixzz0tOkFq6Ni

The attempts by the Liberal Democrats to give men accused of rape anonymity are looking increasingly fragile.  The rebellion, led by a CONSERVATIVE female MP tells us a lot about female politics…as well as confirming Arthur Schopenhauer’s ‘misogynistic’ observation that ‘the fundamental defect of a woman is a lack of a sense of justice’.

Whether they are representatives of ‘the left’ or ‘the right’, female politicians invariably speak for the interests of women. On this issue, only one question is relevant for them. Will granting anonymity to men accused of rape increase female sexual power, or decrease it?  No brainer.  It will decrease it, and therefore every woman MP, no matter what supposed party political allegiance, will fight against it.  Men’s rights? Human rights?…pffffff.

And again, to the deluded majority of the men’s rights movement who assume that our cause is synonymous with conservatism – this bill (to grant men anonymity) is being re-introduced by the liberals.  When British women were granted anonymity in rape trials several decades ago, the accused men were given the same protection.  It was the CONSERVATIVE party who changed this in 1982, allowing hundreds of men’s lives to be ruined by false allegations in the years since.

As you would expect, the False Rape Society is doing an excellent job in covering developments in what might turn out to be a defining moment for the future of men’s rights.

If you live in the UK, please write to (e-mail) your MP stating the case for anonymity for accused men : Write to Them

Steve Moxon’s The Woman Racket – looking forward to reading this

I’ve read a few anti-feminist books, and I think I’m aware of the existance of most of the few that I haven’t yet got round to, but this one has somehow slipped under my radar.  Until, that is, a loyal reader by the name of ‘Highwayman’ informed me of it in a comment left here a few days ago.  I can only think that the reasons it doesn’t get mentioned a lot in the MRM community are similar to the relative neglect of Neil Lyndon’s classic ‘No More Sex War’ :

  1. It’s by a British author.
  2. It’s pro sex (or at least against the feminist rape of male sexuality).
  3. The author has probably never had a wet dream involving Sarah Palin.

Anyway, here’s the Highlander’s excellent comments on the book – comments that prompted me to order it from Amazon the same night and have left me drooling in anticipation at reading one of those rare books that might affect my entire intellectual landscape.  Hopefully it lives up to my expectations and I’ll try to put up a review here very soon.

I highly recommend reading the chapter on prostitution in Steve Moxon’s book The Woman Racket. He really tears into the arguments that feminists and others try to use to suppress prostitution and to punish the men who patron sex care workers.

His theory as to what motivates people to oppose men patroning prostitutes is interesting. He belives it is caused by the “cheater detection mechanism” whereby people become outraged by what they PERCEIVE is a lower status male having access to females that his position in the dominance hierachy would not allow him to if he were not to patron prostitutes. This could explain why some men are also opposed to men seeing sex care workers because they might fear that if lower status males can “cheat the system” then perhaps the entire dominance heirarchy could be undermined. Of course it could also be that some men oppose the patronage of sex care workers because they believe that a deity commands them to or because they are trying to suck it up to women too.

BTW according to research men who patron sex care workers come from all varieties of socio-economic backgrounds and even if some unattractive or “lower status” men are able to find some sexual fulfillment through patroning sex care workers…good for them I say!

Bernard Chapin, author of one of the classic anti-feminist works himself, has compiled this excellent Men’s Rights Book List

Also check out this classic old skool Chapin’s Inferno :

 Brock Lesnar and Kurt Angle Fight Over Emma Watson

You see old femiwhores – you could introduce the death penalty for glancing in the street at a girl under 21 and castrated bitch MRAs might be the first to applaud you. But you know what? Ultra alpha males like Brock and Kurt would still fight over who caught the pretty jailbait’s eye.  🙂