Manga Fan Becomes First Victim of Sweden’s Virtual Child Porn Laws

cute anime girlSpiked Magazine reports on how a bespectacled nerd has become (probably the first) victim of Sweden’s recently passed virtual child pornography laws that criminalize even cartoon drawings  of ‘people’ who appear under 18 and which are deemed ‘sexual’.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10349/

Simon Lundström was convicted of possessing 50 odd manga images – defined as child porn – and ordered to pay £500.  It should be noted that all EU nations are soon to be forced to adopt the same virtual child porn laws (naturally, the UK already has, in fact it was the first, and the law was no doubt lobbied for furiously by the NSPCC).  It should be further noted that under the same forthcoming EU directive, ANYBODY found merely VIEWING a single image of what FEMINISTS DEFINE as child porn will face a MANDATORY TWO YEARS ASS RAPE IN PRISON.  In other words, if you still don’t get this as a men’s rights issue, every European man who surfs the internet will face the fear of having his door smashed down in the early hours of the morning and the process begun to have him raped and beaten in prison for a minimum two years -

for looking at a single image of a saucer eyed fictional manga girl in a bikini.

And if you still want to pretend that feminists giving their gynocratic state that kind of horrific power and control over the vast majority of European men is not a men’s rights issue I hope one day you…ahh fuck it, just convert to Islam and fuck off, please.

Spiked Magazine goes on to report how a Swedish cultural commentator…

… points out, it should not simply be left to ‘other young cartoon nerds and Manga fans’ to defend Lundström against the legal and moral trials he has been subjected to since a note informing him that he was suspected of child pornography crimes was slipped through his home mailbox last summer. Instead, anyone who values freedom of speech must also defend the renowned Manga expert.

I would suggest too, anyone who values the liberty of men against horrific and insane feminist sexual trade union legislation i.e. any and every men’s rights supporter.  Unfortunately, and to our eternal shame, that is not the case.

One brave men’s rights supporter who is willing to speak out on barbaric misandristic laws such as these is Human Stupidity, who had an article on the forthcoming European Directive published by the equally fearless Ferdinand Bardemu at Inmalafide:

http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/03/31/leading-sex-research-experts-against-child-porn-laws-adolescents-and-young-adults-are-no-children/

Meanwhile, as if just to remind us of the astonishing power of feminists to change social mores and legislation in such a remarkably brief period of time, British tabloid the Daily Sport is about to go bankrupt.  This is the very same newspaper that only a decade ago was holding competitions for its readers to win the chance to have sex with 16 year old pornstars, and which used to feature 15 year old glamour models and count down the days until their 16th birthday when they could legally publish them naked.  It’s been a while since I bought the Daily Sport, but if it has covered the case of manga fan Simon Lundström, no doubt it has called on its remaining readers to lynch the sick perverted paedo nonce.

All hail to the sexual trade union – the most destructive and terrifying force of nature ever to wreak havoc upon the Earth!

NOTES :

If you are a European men’s rights supporter and regularly visit all the main blogs in the MRM, then you will undoubtedly have come across manga images, or digital images, that would be in danger of falling foul of these absurd laws.  This is because most men’s rights bloggers, including the leading ones, are American, and the USA does not have the same absurd feminist laws on virtual child porn as most of the rest of the world.  Thus these brave American bloggers, who are adamant that discussion of feminst laws on CP have no place in the men’s rights movement, aren’t affected by these laws, and seem only too happy to leave their European and Australian readers with the trace of a digital image of a fictional girl in a bikini that could be enough to land them with 2 years of anal rape and a life on the sex offender’s register.

I would also further repeat, that the reason America is actually one of the most ‘liberal’ countries in the world regarding the definition of CP is because its government (including that of Bill Clinton) refused to sign up to the feminist United Nations treaty on the rights of the child, which defined any sexual image, real or virtual, of a child who ‘appears’ under 18 to be CP – NOT because it disagreed with the definition, but because it didn’t want to give up its inalienable right to put mentally retarded black 16 year olds on to Death Row, or to send 16 year old boys away as cannon fodder in future petroleum wars, things that were also required by the treaty.

Human Stupidity part 1 – Social Manipulation

Just how have we, as men, arrived at the grim situation I described in yesterday’s post?  A world in which young white boys, filled by feelings of sexual inadequacy, kill themselves because they have the wrong colour penis. Boys who are crucified by feminists for making teenage girls feel inadequate through ‘idealizing’ the diminishing number of the female sex who aren’t grotesquely and dangerously obese. Those same boys who grow up into a world in which by the time they are 18 or 19 will begin to fear being socially and legally lynched as the worst subhuman perverts imaginable if they continue to pursue, or even look at, females of peak sexual attractiveness, i.e. young girls.  A perverted gynocracy in which men are so castrated, that to even admit that girls 5 0r 6 years post-pubescent are attractive is to risk the ultimate in shaming language – and not just from women, but from fellow men…even ‘men’s rights activists’. LOL!   Meanwhile, boys as young as 12 consume steroids and join violent gangs in order to live up to the grotesque conception of masculinity demanded by the young urban white female.  And whilst men increasingly go to jail if they pay for sex, or even click on a mouse to view a forbidden cartoon image, tens of thousands of wealthy European women flock to the Carribean each summer to spend their grotesquely inflated divorce payouts in ‘hunting the big bamboos’ of illiterate, drug addled, poverty stricken rastafarians with average IQs of 75 (the same mental age as the average middle-class European 12 year old girl).

The only immediate and obvious answers, it seems to me, lie in evolutionary psychology.  I don’t need to invoke ’cultural marxism’ for an explanation as to why 99% of the ways feminists screw men over happen to perfectly coincide with the reproductive needs of a heavy parental investment female simian in a free sexual ‘jungle’.  I turn to evolutionary psychology.

And this is exactly what the excellent Human-Stupidity.com has done with his analysis of how feminists have used their evolutionary sharpened verbal, gossip, and social manipulation skills to simply annihilate men and our sexuality in the 21st century sex war.  A war in which only one side has thus far turned up to fight.

In evolution, everything is result of an evolutionary arms race.  (cheetah and gazelle’s running skills, bacteria vs. our bodily defense system, …) Skills and capacities get honed over time, to solve evolutionary tasks.  Women, in evolutionary time, had the hard task to convince a much stronger man to assume his paternal role and take care of her offspring (which might be his, or even just his cuckold offspring).  In any argument, men had clear superiority with 2 powerful weapons

  • economical superiority: men were the hunters, they had the meat, they also could defend and own territory
  • physical superiority: men could always win an argument by brute force, by simple violence.

So to achieve some kind of evolutionary long term equilibrium, women must have developed some weapeons to counter men’s economical & physical power. What weapons could they have?

  • Social manipulation: gossiping among women, ganging up together against the common enemy, making intrigues, badmouthing a man, destroying his reputation, manipulating the opinion of other men (and women).

Women would actually need the skills to win over other men to defend the female agenda. In order to counter men’s physical superiority, women needed to be better then men at these social manipulation skills.  They could not confront men clearly straight on, or else men could resort to the big stick argument. They would have to “con” men into doing what is in women’s interest, without men noticing.

Women would have to manipulate especially skillfully, when it has to do with reproductive success, with getting men to provide for them and their kids, with men staying away from other women.

So the historical stone age balance of power is:
  • men have economical and physical superiority,
  • women have verbal manipulation, cunningness, intrigue, social manipulation.
Nowadays, men surrendered their physical and economical power. Women maintained and expanded their verbal manipulative social power…

Read the complete article at Human-Stupidity.com

Although I have near completely given up on the men’s rights movement over the last few months, and any belief that it might become anything more than a tiny irritation upon the wrinkled skin of feminism, I still cling to the hope that the ever accelerating rate of technological change might eventually render the sex war meaningless.  I don’t think feminists can ever be defeated.  When you understand what feminism is, to believe that it can be is as silly as believing you can ‘defeat’ life itself.  The hope must be to somehow render feminism irrelevant for women, and in a way that is positive and fair to all men.

It’s a hope, but I don’t think a very great one.  Perhaps in 30 years time even feminists will be so happy, waking up each morning and being fucked by their king kong sex robots with their 20″ power drill black penises, that they won’t care if millions of men are doing similar with their perfect nubile 16 year old Anna Kournikova silicone replicants.  Unfortunately, women aren’t psychologically satisfied by the satiation of their physical sexual needs in the way that men can be. They will still feel ‘threatened’ and insecure by the ready availability to men of female beauty and youth. They will still want to take a legal hammer to those Anna sex bots, no matter how many electric black cocks they themselves are being happily serviced by.

anna-kournikova-16-year-old

Will feminists (or 'men's rights activists') allow men to wake up to 16 year old Anna Kournikova sex bots?