Spiked Magazine reports on how a bespectacled nerd has become (probably the first) victim of Sweden’s recently passed virtual child pornography laws that criminalize even cartoon drawings of ‘people’ who appear under 18 and which are deemed ‘sexual’.
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10349/
Simon Lundström was convicted of possessing 50 odd manga images – defined as child porn – and ordered to pay £500. It should be noted that all EU nations are soon to be forced to adopt the same virtual child porn laws (naturally, the UK already has, in fact it was the first, and the law was no doubt lobbied for furiously by the NSPCC). It should be further noted that under the same forthcoming EU directive, ANYBODY found merely VIEWING a single image of what FEMINISTS DEFINE as child porn will face a MANDATORY TWO YEARS ASS RAPE IN PRISON. In other words, if you still don’t get this as a men’s rights issue, every European man who surfs the internet will face the fear of having his door smashed down in the early hours of the morning and the process begun to have him raped and beaten in prison for a minimum two years -
for looking at a single image of a saucer eyed fictional manga girl in a bikini.
And if you still want to pretend that feminists giving their gynocratic state that kind of horrific power and control over the vast majority of European men is not a men’s rights issue I hope one day you…ahh fuck it, just convert to Islam and fuck off, please.
Spiked Magazine goes on to report how a Swedish cultural commentator…
… points out, it should not simply be left to ‘other young cartoon nerds and Manga fans’ to defend Lundström against the legal and moral trials he has been subjected to since a note informing him that he was suspected of child pornography crimes was slipped through his home mailbox last summer. Instead, anyone who values freedom of speech must also defend the renowned Manga expert.
I would suggest too, anyone who values the liberty of men against horrific and insane feminist sexual trade union legislation i.e. any and every men’s rights supporter. Unfortunately, and to our eternal shame, that is not the case.
One brave men’s rights supporter who is willing to speak out on barbaric misandristic laws such as these is Human Stupidity, who had an article on the forthcoming European Directive published by the equally fearless Ferdinand Bardemu at Inmalafide:
Meanwhile, as if just to remind us of the astonishing power of feminists to change social mores and legislation in such a remarkably brief period of time, British tabloid the Daily Sport is about to go bankrupt. This is the very same newspaper that only a decade ago was holding competitions for its readers to win the chance to have sex with 16 year old pornstars, and which used to feature 15 year old glamour models and count down the days until their 16th birthday when they could legally publish them naked. It’s been a while since I bought the Daily Sport, but if it has covered the case of manga fan Simon Lundström, no doubt it has called on its remaining readers to lynch the sick perverted paedo nonce.
All hail to the sexual trade union – the most destructive and terrifying force of nature ever to wreak havoc upon the Earth!
NOTES :
If you are a European men’s rights supporter and regularly visit all the main blogs in the MRM, then you will undoubtedly have come across manga images, or digital images, that would be in danger of falling foul of these absurd laws. This is because most men’s rights bloggers, including the leading ones, are American, and the USA does not have the same absurd feminist laws on virtual child porn as most of the rest of the world. Thus these brave American bloggers, who are adamant that discussion of feminst laws on CP have no place in the men’s rights movement, aren’t affected by these laws, and seem only too happy to leave their European and Australian readers with the trace of a digital image of a fictional girl in a bikini that could be enough to land them with 2 years of anal rape and a life on the sex offender’s register.
I would also further repeat, that the reason America is actually one of the most ‘liberal’ countries in the world regarding the definition of CP is because its government (including that of Bill Clinton) refused to sign up to the feminist United Nations treaty on the rights of the child, which defined any sexual image, real or virtual, of a child who ‘appears’ under 18 to be CP – NOT because it disagreed with the definition, but because it didn’t want to give up its inalienable right to put mentally retarded black 16 year olds on to Death Row, or to send 16 year old boys away as cannon fodder in future petroleum wars, things that were also required by the treaty.
