David Futrelle Still Allowing a Paedophile Sadist Who Fantasises about Crucifying Women and Girls to Comment at his Site

David Futrelle

David Futrelle, the disgraced blogger and child scat torture gay porn apologist, recently updated his comments policy after use of certain words were causing ‘triggers’ and other offence amongst his easily offended readers. In particular, regular commentators at the site were reminded to choose their words carefully when describing mental illness. Understandable, perhaps, given that many of his commentators appear to be clearly mentally ill. But along with banning words such as ‘crazy’, the disgraced Chicago blogger Futrelle has made a particular point of warning his followers not to use the term ‘psycho’. This might explain why a transvestite sadist who runs a sick forum devoted to the sharing of fantasies of torturing and crucifying women and schoolgirls is still allowed to comment at WeHuntedTheMammoth, nearly a year after I made public here exactly what he was.

David Futrelle Fury
David Futrelle reacted with fury when I revealed his favourite transvestite sadist was a paedophile psychopath

When I first exposed ‘RalMCG’ as a pervert who openly helps moderate a truly sick bdsm forum that specialises in the rape, torture, and crucifixion of women and girls, Futrelle appeared to react with fury – vowing revenge by publicly pledging support to a woman who had threatened to track me down and kill me (note that I had not doxxed ralmcg at all – he openly uses the same handle at Futrelle’s site as elsewhere online, including the perverted bdsm forum).

It is certainly beyond question that Futrelle must have been aware of my article, as must have many of his readers. For a couple of months after the piece was published here, Ralmcg appeared to go silent at Fraudtrelle’s site, and I assumed that the ManBoobz had had the sense to ban him, albeit quietly and grudgingly. But that’s not the case. RalMCG has been back commenting again, using the very same account as before, only this time he has a new avatar, which again features the pervert wearing his favourite ‘Daisy Dukes’ in order to show off his hairy legs. Disturbingly, he appears also to be wearing a t-shirt that, at first glance at least, looks like it is splattered in blood.


Although RalMCG claims to be concerned with victims of rape, you wouldn’t guess so from the comments he leaves at the sick bdsm forum of which he is ‘assistant executioner’.  In fact, the idea of women and girls being raped along with being tortured, and even murdered, is evidently a sexual obsession.


None of Futrelle’s other commentators, many of whom appear to be sadistic male transvestites like Ralmcg, rather than genuine feminists, seem to have any problem with him at all, despite a number of them being aware of my article. Perhaps unsurprising, as most of those commentators strongly support Futrelle’s view that a paedophile made video – SALO – that features nothing but graphic images of naked children being raped and tortured to death, should be allowed to be distributed as fap material in gay sex shops.




Note that David Futrelle’s attacks on the ‘manosphere’ played a key role in the decision of the left-wing extremist group – the SLPC – to characterize the men’s rights movement as a ‘hate movement’.  This in turn is being used at this moment in attempts to ban Roosh V from speaking on men’s issues in  Canada.

david-futrelle-11 (2)
Disgraced blogger and child scat torture gay porn apologist David Futrelle – greatgrandson of ‘The Thinking Machine’ author Jacques Futrelle

Yet David Futrelle, great grandson of ‘The Thinking Machine’ author Jacques Futrelle, jokes about ‘dumb’ policemen who believe that videos depicting children being tortured, raped, and murdered are not valid fap material for gay sex shops.  Not only this, be continues to allow a sadistic paedophile transvestite who openly fantasizes over the torture, rape and murder of women and children to comment at his site.

Futhermore, readers at his site regularly incite violence and make threats against MRAs that go well beyond the ‘hate’ seen anywhere in the manosphere.  Here is just one example published on his blog recently :


The reader – Monopole – approvingly quotes a male celebrity justifying the shooting and murder of men by women.  Yesterday, I highlighted how Futrelle was allowing readers to call for Roosh V to have toxic and potentially lethal chemicals thrown over him.

WeHuntedtheMammoth, is not only a hate site, but something even worse than that.  It appears to be a shelter for those who sexually fantasize about the torture, rape, and murder of children, women, and men.


David Futrelle Publishes Incitement to Violence Against Roosh V


david-futrelle-11 (2)
David Futrelle

David Futrelle is publishing numerous comments at his site approving of criminal violent acts against Roosh V and his supporters, and encouraging feminists in Canada to engage in further illegal acts, including the use of toxic chemical substances.



Although describing Roosh or anybody else as ‘mentally ill’ breaks Futrelle’s commenting guidelines, proposing that Roosh has toxic and potentially lethal chemicals thrown over him is fine :


Tellurium compounds are a class of extremely toxic and potentially life threatening chemicals :



David Futrelle regularly publishes comments from his readers that incite or encourage violence against MRAs and other men. Recently, he published a reader’s comment that approvingly quoted a male celebritiy justifying extreme acts of violence and even murder against men by women.


David Futrelle’s website ‘ManBoobz’ was used as a primary source by the Southern Law Poverty Group’s designation of men’s rights and pick-up sites as constituting a ‘hate movement’, something that is being used in the attempts by Canadian feminists to ban Roosh from speaking in Canada. David Futrelle himself has a history of vile child abuse apologia, the worst of which was his defence of the sale in a gay sex shop of a video containing nothing but images of naked children being anally raped, tortured, disemboweled and murdered.

David Futrelle and the Lynching of Sam Pepper

David Futrelle – Alleged sadistic paedophile psychopath

Sam Pepper is the YouTube prankster taking a lot of heat at the moment for a video he uploaded recently that features him pinching the bottoms of young women whilst using a fake hand (in his pocket) to blame passers by with.

A funny if rather crass video, and it was certainly naieve on his part not to realise that the feminazis would unleash hell against him as a result.

Over the last couple of days it’s turned into a real public lynching for young Sam Pepper (who still looks like and clearly has the personality of a teenage boy). Several female YouTubers and former fans of Sam have come out with claims that he sexually harassed them in the past, with one even alleging that he raped her.

Although no arrest has been made, and it’s not even clear whether there is any evidence against him, it hasn’t stopped the child torture porn apologist David Futrelle from accusing Mr Pepper of being a ‘rapist’. Not only that, but boasting of the right of himself and feminists to publicly accuse men of being rapists, even if they have been found innocent, let alone never been arrested. This is a ‘man’, remember, who continues to advocate for the right of gay sex shops to rent out ‘classic’ videos depicting actual 14 year old naked boys being anally raped, tortured, made to eat shit, and disembowlled, and who then threatens to sue for libel anybody who points out the depravity of that.



There appears to be no evidence against Pepper other than the word of the women making the accusations. One such woman claims that he asked for nude photos of her when she was 15. Unfortunately for her, and for her expected increase in YouTube subscribers, the only ‘evidence’ she provides is a screenshot of a Facebook chat in which he (it is allegedly him in the chat although his name is not visible) asks her to simply show him some ‘photos’ of her (that they should be nude is not implied, let alone stated). Another scorned fan claims that he ‘groped’ her whilst on a date with him at a cinema, when she was 16, AFTER she had already let him kiss her, and despite the fact that she was above the British age of consent of 16.

Although there appears to be zero evidence against the man, under recent changes to guidelines given to the prosecution service in the UK, a man can be convicted of sexual abuse simply if enough women come out of the woodwork and accuse him of it, and their accounts of his behaviour broadly ‘match’. This is how Rolf Harris was convicted upon the basis of nothing other than the word of his accusers (all of whom will now recieve financial ‘compensation’). In the case of Sam Pepper, we are literally witnessing an online lynching and destruction of a young man’s life – with David Futrelle now attempting to act as the cheerleader.

In the light of David Futrelle’s continued defence of child torture porn being sold in gay sex shops, his repeated history of child abuse apologia, and his shocking article written in the same year as his child torture porn defence, in which he claims that we all have a secret urge to torture others – an urge that is only kept under control primarily by watching torture and murder on film, several observers have suggested that Futrelle is a sadistic paedophile with a particular fetish for the sexual abuse and torture of young boys.

It has also been noted that Futrelle’s public obsession with torture and child abuse reached a height in the same year that a fellow resident of Chicago – John Wayne Gacy – was arrested for the sadistic murder of numerous young boys.

However, I believe that a man is innocent until proven guilty. Let’s just hope the FBI are doing their job.

In the meantime, I would say that I do believe that David Futrelle is getting a sexual thrill from the online lynching of a young lad.

One Amazon review of the ‘classic’ that David Futrelle believes should be sold openly in gay sex shops, unhindered by the child protection concerns of ‘dumb’ policemen :

All biases aside, this film is nothing more than 117 minutes of continuous torture and sexual perversion directed at young people. Any socially responsible director can get his point across without feeling the need to wallow in this filth with child actors being violated in nearly every way possible . I have no doubt that Passolini either was getting his jollies out of the action being performed in front of his camera or was suffering great mental illness in order to allow his cast to be degraded in this way. It really is no wonder he was murdered shortly after completion of this film….As another reviewer has previously said this is an evil film and leaves an incredibly bad taste in ones mouth particularly when one realises they have partaken in this viewing experience willingly and contributed to the films revenue.

David Futrelle and the ‘co-ercive strategies controlling the sexual behaviour of YOUNG girls’

In reply to it becoming open knowledge that David Futrelle appeared to defend child prostitution and an age of consent of 12 or 13, he has quoted an obtuse passage from the book he was reviewing in his original infamous article that he wrote back in the 1990’s.

His pathetic defence begins by his claiming that he meant women when he said girls….even when he said ‘YOUNG girls’.

The rest of his ‘defence’ then blatantly contradicts this. Even though he means adult women when he refers to ‘young girls’, he then likens his statement regarding ‘co-ercive strategies’ to the modern abstinance movement…which is aimed at young girls…i.e. YOUNG GIRLS.

Take a look at the passage from his article yourself :


It is clear from the very quotes Futrelle took from Josephine Butler, that ‘co-ercive strategies’ is being used by both Butler and himself in reference to legal measures.  It only makes sense in a context of there also being ‘non-coercive’ strategies employed by the Butlerites (which would be akin to simply ‘encouraging’ abstinance and the like). The ONLY legal ‘co-ercive strategies’ that the Butlerites engaged in was to (successfully) campaign for the raising of the age of consent – raised from 13 to 16 in the 1885 Criminal Amendment Act, also subtitled ‘An act to make further provision for the protection of women and girls.

Any reasonable reader would interpret David Futrelle’s statement as referring to that act – the raising of the age of consent from 13 to 16 with the aim of ending child prostitution.  Particularly in the wider context of David Futrelle’s writings in the 1990’s, which often deal with the theme of abuse, and in particular child sexual abuse, with Futrelle often crudely mocking the very idea of it (including claiming that the innocence of victims of abuse is exaggerated in an article in which he compares child abuse victims to ‘victims’ of alien abduction).  Futrelle also once suggested that 13 year old statutory rape victims should be encouraged to marry the men who raped them.  He also worked alongside Judith Levine at the time, the world’s most famous ‘statutory rape apologist’ (as Fraudtrelle would now label her).  One of Futrelle’s articles is actually referenced in her book ‘Harmful to Minors’ which calls for the age of consent to be lowered back down to 12.

When David Futrelle Suggested 13 Year Old Child Rape Victims Should Be Encourged to Marry the Paedophiles Who Raped Them (Who would be spared jail)

If there is one consistant theme in David Futrelle’s writings of the 1990’s it is child abuse apologia.  Several of these articles have been discussed in the men’s rights sphere recently, but one very important piece, actually published by Salon, has still yet to be raised.  In the article, entitled ‘Sex and the Single Girl’, Futrelle appears to make the astonishing suggestion that statutory rape victims as young as 13 should be encouraged to marry the adults who raped them, who themselves would escape prison.

(TRIGGER WARNINGS) : http://www.salon.com/1996/09/09/news_536/

One wonders what Pat would have thought of the Orange County, Calif., social workers who have been helping teenage girls in their charge — some of them as young as 13 — to get married to the men who have impregnated them, rather than trying to get the men arrested on charges of statutory rape.

The story has become a roiling controversy. Imagine! A government agency serving as a matchmaker for sexual predators! “Helping pregnant 13-year-olds to marry the men who have physically and sexually abused them will result not only in continued abuse of the adolescent, but there is strong evidence that it will soon result in abuse to the child,” a professor of social work complained in an angry letter to the Los Angeles Times. “And when the marriage ends with additional children and more abuse, will Orange County Social Services create a dating service for abusive men to cycle them into new relationships with troubled adolescents?”

Questions like these prompted Orange County (one of the most Republican in the country) to retreat from its matchmaker role. But the details of the cases cause one to pause a moment. Thirteen-year-old Isabel Gomez told social workers she truly loved her 20-year-old boyfriend. Isabel’s mother — herself only 29 — is convinced her daughter’s troubled life has improved dramatically since he stepped into her life.
Since the marriage, she told the Los Angeles Times, “everything is much better.”
The situation, admittedly, is far from ideal. But would Isabel Gomez be better served if the father of her child was behind bars?

That’s a harder question to answer. Two-thirds of all teen
pregnancies involve adult men, and we can’t put them all in jail.

This was written by the same schizoid man who is threatening libel action over the suggestion that when he said Victorian feminists ‘used co-ercive strategies to control the sexual behaviour of young girls’, what he meant was that Victorian feminists ‘used co-ercive strategies to control the sexual behaviour of young girls’ – i.e. raised the age of consent from 12/13 to 16 in order to end child prostitution.

Perhaps David Futrelle needs to either shut up or simply apologize to his feminist readers for the things he wrote in the 1990’s.  As well as to Warren Farrell.

Did David Futrelle Defend Child Prostitution and an Age of Consent of 12? – Feminists Fighting Child Sex Slavery Used ‘Coercive Strategies to Control the Sexual Behaviour of Young Girls’ (Re-Post)

In a 1995 article for ‘In These Times’, David Futrelle made the extraordinary claim that Victorian feminists used ‘coercive strategies to control the sexual behaviour of young girls’.

What on Earth could he have meant by such a statement?

His article consists of a review of a book that explores the infamously hypocritical sexuality of the Victorians – ‘When Passion Reigned‘.  Much of the article is given over to discussion of the Social Purity Movements of the era – the forerunners of feminism – led in particular by Josephine Butler and her ‘Butlerite’ followers. The main goals of the Victorian Purity Movements were to criminalize prostitution and raise the age of consent from 12 to 16, which they succeeded in doing so in 1885 (in a bill which also criminalized homosexuality in the UK).

Once their goals had been achieved, mainly through the generation of tabloid hysteria over ‘child sex slavery’, Josephine Butler and her followers formed the National Vigilance Association. Mobs of feminists would break into brothels and ‘rescue’ the young girls and adult women found working within them – whether or not the girls wanted to be rescued, which in nearly every instance, they didn’t.  In one famous case, a brothel was raided by the feminists and 400 young girls found to be working there.  Each of them was offered work and accomodation – only 6 of the 400 accepted, the rest steadfastly insisting that they were working in the brothel of their own free will.

Before Futrelle’s statement regarding ‘co-ercive strategies’, he refers to such a case in which a girl is ‘rescued’ but ‘obstinately reiterated her wish to live the life she’d chosen “of my own free will”‘.

He then notes that even Josephine Butler made a famous speech attacking such raids, warning feminists to ‘Beware the Purity Societies’, who mistakenly believed that you could ‘oblige humans to be moral by force’.

It is at this point that Futrelle makes his controversial quote :

But even the Butlerites couldn’t always heed their own advice, at times falling back on coercive strategies to control the sexual behaviour of young girls


So what could David Futrelle have intended his liberal sex positive readers to understand by his statement?  As mentioned above, with regards to the ‘sexual behaviour of young girls’, the Butlerites are famous only for raising the age of consent to 16 with the aim of ending child prostitution (and then raiding brothels and rescuing young girls found to be working there).

According to the Wikipedia entry on Josephine Butler :

In 1885 she was drawn into another related campaign led by the campaigning editor of the Pall Mall Gazette, William Thomas Stead. He had published a series of articles entitled The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon exposing the extent of child prostitution in London. As a result of this campaign, the age of consent in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was raised from 13 to 16 that same year.


**Update – see : http://theantifeminist.com/the-criminal-amendment-act-1885-an-act-to-make-further-provision-for-the-protection-of-women-and-girls/