Rebekah Brooks, an avowed feminist, is probably the one individual who has done most to create the rabid paedohysteria that is degrading and undermining the fabric of British society. If you are a British man and you daren’t walk in the park alone, or dread small children sitting next to you on the bus, for fear of the looks and the comments that people might give you, simply because you are a man..well, Rebekah Brooks is perhaps the biggest single reason why.

As editor of the News of the World in 2000,  she launched the infamous ‘name and shame campaign’ which intended to publish the names and addresses of every convicted sex offender in the UK (I can’t recall them ever publishing the name of a female sex offender).  This was a shocking testament to the growing power of the tabloid gutter press to determine morals – unlike in the USA, sex offenders in the UK and Europe, at that time at least, were still considered flawed human beings, and to have the basic right not to be put in danger by vigilante mobs.

That name and shame campaign was launched in the aftermath of the murder of 8 year old Sarah Payne by an opportunist psychopath. The anti-paedophile hysteria subsequently generated and exploited by the tabloids, and Rubert Murdoch’s Sun and News of the World papers in particular, quickly turned the UK from a country that fell in love with 16 year old Russian tennis players, to a country where looking at pictures of women with small breasts might get you put away as a nonce. A place where paediatricians live in fear of having their homes burnt down every time the News of the World whips the mob into an anti-paedo frenzy.

But this is where words almost begin to fail me.

Revelations have emerged in the last couple of days that not only did the News of the World hack into the phone lines of celebrities, sports stars, and politicians, in order to boost circulation figures with a ‘scoop’, under the editorship of Rebekah Brooks (then known as Rebekah Wade) they allegedly..

hacked into the mobile phone of a missing British schoolgirl, Milly Dowler, who was later found murdered.

The paper took particular interest in the Dowler case, they have claimed, as  part of their high-profile campaign against paedophile activity – a campaign  launched and closely overseen by the  paper’s then editor, Rebekah Wade (now  Brooks), and her deputy, Andy Coulson, who has already resigned from the paper  (in 2007) and the prime minister’s press office (in January this year) over his   connection with previous phone-hacking scandals.

By deleting messages illegally retrieved from Milly Dowler’s mobile phone,  the paper misled her family into believing she had emptied her inbox herself and  was still alive – when she was not. This  gave the family hope, which was  exploited by the paper in publishing optimistic interviews with them.

In deleting the earlier messages, the paper also removed information that  would have had a direct impact on the police investigation of Milly’s  disappearance.

http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/81220,news-comment,news-politics,milly-dowler-disclosure-puts-rebekah-brooks-in-spotlight

Profile of Rebekah Brooks (Wade) : http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2001/jul/16/mediatop100200183

News of the World Name and Shame Campaign : http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ministers-praise-name-and-shame-campaign-620470.html

News of the world Hacking Scandal : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11195407

Brooks News Corp Woman’s network :
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/MillinMn/rupert-murdoch-rebekah-br_n_450900_39556113.html
Rebekah Wade arrested for domestic violence : http://squte.com/static/usenet/messages/uuu-ue-ho-tru-uu-kemp-spat-didnt-dv-philip-martin-lewis.xml

This is the true face of feminist evil behind the ‘child protection’ industry. The true face behind the mask of concern for children and protecting them from ‘paedophiles’.  Women who compare having abortions to choosing a sofa at IKEA.  Women who run newspapers that are willing to exploit child abuse hysteria to the extent of hacking into the mobile phones of murdered school children, hampering the police investigation, in order to boost their own dwindling circulation figures.

And it will forever be my right, as a men’s rights activist, to question the selfish sexual laws that these creatures make against men under the pretence of child protection.

Beyond evil.

Rebekah Brooks : ‘Don’t Blame me, I’m a victim too!’

Girl Get’s Beaten into Coma (NSFW – but safe for feminists)

What on earth is wrong with two girls fighting? Will their wombs drop? Do you think that only boys should fight? You don’t have any real arguments! Absolutely ridiculous. Besides, you can moderate any comments out- so you may have had hundreds of rational, well argued, legitimate comments, but you won’t have published any of them.

I’m not devoting an entire post to this feminist’s comments because they contain any semblance of logic or reason.  Rather, it is because they sickeningly highlight how little feminists care about the indisputably real and graphic abuse of children when it doesn’t limit their own adult sexual interests in a free sexual market.

A young girl, obviously being bullied, being beaten into what appears to be a coma whilst her schoolmates gather round cheering and recording it on their mobile phones, is a clear and transparent case of abuse. At least to normal, healthy, non-feminists. The fact that those children then upload the video to an American website that openly makes money from its millions of morality lite viewers clicking on advertisements from American companies (often including Google Adsense) is indescribably sick.  The fact that child protection societies such as Barnardos, the NSPCC, and ECAP do NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING, to stop it, speaks volumes for what they are.  Middle-aged feminist sexual pressure groups that do not care in the least about stopping real child abuse, but which are only interested in 1/ limiting competition to themselves from teenage girls in a free sexual market 2/ making themselves lots of money and 3/ weakening the family unit and demonizing men.

One thing I do want to make clear though is that I’m in no way suggesting that videos of young girls being beaten half to death for video entertainment are in any way worse than those featuring boys.  In fact, if anything good comes out of these videos it is in revealing how infinitely much more evil and vicious girls are than boys and how the greatest threat to the welfare of young girls is not boys, nor even ’online predators’, but other teenage girls.

In fact, on these morally depraved sites, boy fights are much rarer, and most often much less violent.  Boys seem to know when to stop.  Boys don’t seem to actually want to kill each other over who said what about who on MySpace.  Boys don’t seem to gang up and bully and beat into comas smaller, weaker boys.  However, the very worst are just as indescribably evil :

http://www.mentalzero.com/Bathroom-Beatdown-Leaves-Nerdy-Kid-Bleeding-1049.html

I also don’t wish to ignore the fact that most of the viewers of these sites are probably male.  Men are programmed to enjoy watching violence, just as those who aren’t homosexual, or attracted to small children, naturally enjoy looking at fertile teenage girls.  The relevant question is why do female dominated child protection charities focus only on criminilizing men world-wide for merely looking at a picture of a sexy 17 year old girl in a thong, and yet completely ignore websites that make money from showing graphic physical abuse of children (in which the corrolation between ‘the demand feeds the supply’ is far more obvious)? 

If I have to spell out the answer one more time, I may as well give up.

Here is a suggestion to the Men’s rights community.  Let’s make a concerted  campaign of stopping these schoolchild fight video sites.  Let’s show that we, unlike feminists and their fake child protection charities, actually care about putting an end to the indisputable and obvious abuse and exploitation of children.  If they are unwilling to stop the genuine abuse of girls, then we sure as hell will stop the abuse and exploitation of boys.

Hey, wait a moment.  I forgot myself there.  95% of MRAs are too busy trying to prove that as many women break feminist sex laws as do men. And to criminilize pre-marital sex.  And to tell boys (and girls – we believe in equality) that they’ll go to hell for masturbating.

 Forget it.  Let’s crack open the beer and watch two teenage Russian girls go at it – go at it in the sense of beating the other into a coma… obviously. This is the American way. This is the British way.  This is the feminist way. This is the Men’s Rights way.

Insane brutal kicks to the face leave a girl helpless