Two mothers chaperoning a high school prom in Manitou Springs, Colo., allegedly sprayed Lysol on students for dancing dirty, calling the teen girls “sluts” and “whores.”
About eight students were hit with the disinfectant spray, Manitou Springs police told the Daily News. The spray got in some students’ eyes and mouths, and they had to leave the prom, said police.
A female teen that was at the April 21 dance is pressing charges against the chaperones.
Well, whaddya know? Looks like the boffins are finally catching up with sexual trade union theory, as well as basic common sense. No, really, cultural marxism explains everything about feminism (sarcasm).
Sexual competition affects women more than men in raising jealousy and envy in a work environment, according to a recent study.
The study of analyzing the differences between men and women in feeling jealous and envious was published in the journal Revista de Psicología Sociai by a group of researchers from universities in Valencia, Spain, Groningen, Netherlands, and Palermo, Argentina. Women are more likely to feel jealous and envy in a sexual competition than men, while social skills provoked men and women equally.
“Women with a high level of intrasexual competition are more jealous if the rival is more attractive and more envious if the rival is more powerful and dominating. They did not get any results in men, as no rival characteristics that provoke jealousy or envy predicted intrasexual competition,” co-author Rosario Zurriaga at University of Valencia told Servico de Información y Noticias Científicas (SINC).
Intrasexual competition, as the study defined, is a competition between same sex people trying to keep access to the opposite sex. The group of researchers distributed questionnaires to around 200 people and chose 114 as the sample for the exploratory study. The sample was 50 percent men and 50 percent women, and they had an average age of 36 years and spent 11 years in their current employment.
The studied defined jealously as “a threat or loss of success in a relationship due to interference from a rival and implies a loss or threat of loss of what they had” and envy as “a response to another person who has success, skills, or qualities that they desire and involves a lack in comparison to the envied person”.
Sexual competition made women feel jealous and envious more so than men. Rival’s social skills, however, provoked both men and women equally.
“Our research intends to clarify the role of emotions like envy and jealousy at work. These feelings have not been studied in working contexts and can cause stress in workers and negatively affect the quality of working life,” said the researcher.
“This is one of the first studies that examines rivals’ characteristics in this environment and contributes to a better understanding of conflicts and problems that can occur in working relationships,” they said.
The study implied that in order to prevent the negative effects, they should modify aspects such as the perception of threat, loss, or comparison with others at work.
The British sexual trade union, led again by Kat Banyard and her UK Feminista group, have been holding protests against the latest Miss World contest in London. For more information, read the excellent Human-Stupidity article at InMalaFide (warning – article does contain graphic images of the protestors).
Some feminists do appear to mellow with age, and learn to accept their departure from the free sexual market : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15692592
But it’s also the case that, since those bad old days, television and other mass media have committed crimes far worse than even the “un-reformed” Miss World ceremony did. This year’s competition included a couple of 17-year-olds, the Anna Karenina fan from Bosnia Herzegovina, and Miss El Salvador. Otherwise, just like they’ve been in all 60 years of the competition, they were a collection of young adults, up to (in the case of Miss People’s Republic of China) the age of 25.
This isn’t, in other words, the licensed child abuse (or that’s what it looks like to me, at any rate) that we watch on Britain’s Got Talent, where there is no age limit at all – you could enter your toddler if you wanted to – and where to see a prematurely-sexualised 11-year-old reduced to tears, or a vulnerable middle-aged lady driven to despair, seems to have become part of the pleasure of the show. A hundred, apparently robust, grown-ups in bikinis don’t seem quite as offensive as that.
It does appear that, at a street level, the demographic of sexual trade union politics is becoming younger, although still as hideous. Of course, street protests are nearly always the preserve of the young, but I wonder if it could also be because the unattractive young female, these days, is starting to feel the displacements caused by the free sexual market even more strongly than their older sisters?
Young women have now been brought up to feel they have a right to have a hundred male partners by the age of 21. When it doesn’t happen for these ugly ‘feministas’ then they are even more likely to want to lash out than their aging, and even uglier, older feminist brethren. Perhaps Kat Banyard is a symptom of this?
Here’s the youngest contestant in this years Miss World – the delightful 16 year old Miss Bosnia. And no, I’m not showing you a picture of Kat Banyard. Too early in the morning.
A perfume advert featuring 17 year old actress Dakota Fanning has been banned in the UK for ‘sexualising a child’.
Designer Marc Jacobs’ latest Oh Lola! ad’ campaign starring Dakota Fanning has been banned.
The UK Advertising Standards Agency have deemed the pictures ‘too suggestive’ and have ordered it be pulled forthwith.
In the advert, 17-year-old actress Dakota is wearing a short, pale dress and resting an over-sized bottle of the Oh Lola! Scent between her legs.
According to the regulatory body the “length of her dress, her leg and the position of the perfume bottle drew attention to her sexuality. Because of that, along with her appearance, we considered the ad could be seen to sexualise a child.”
According to other reports, a total of FOUR people had complained about the advert.
Somebody explain to me how it is possible to ‘sexualise’ a 17 year old ‘child’ when the average onset of puberty for girls in the Western world is now around 11 or 12?
Just to send the psychotically jealous old femi-hags even more insane, here’s a behind the scenes look at the making of the advert :
For a bit of light relief to start the week, and since we were on the topic of buggering boys, I thought I’d share these two ‘crank call’ videos, featuring a feisty old man by the name of Ned.
And also because the second video contains the following immortal line, which all opponents of the sexual trade union should memorise by heart :
“You’re just a bitter old bitch who hates the world ’cause everytime you bend over your cooter farts dust!” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lhp5o2WCXI&t=4m0s
A British feminist organisation has held a protest over the opening of a new Playboy club in London. Screaming ‘women’s bodies are not for sale’, the hideous harridans screached loudly enough to earn a spot on BBC News : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13659661 (WARNING : Report contains extremely graphic images of ugly jealous feminists telling pretty girls what not to do with their own bodies).
Taking a look at the femiwhore’s website : http://www.ukfeminista.org.uk/ , you have to admit that they are a well-organized bunch of jealous psychos, with numerous regional and university groups carefully co-ordinated with each other.
The truth is that the men’s rights movement is still a long way from being big enough to achieve anything similar in terms of organisation and public protest.
Maybe in another 5 years time, we will be able to organize a counter protest at events such as this. All of us wearing green eyed monster masks whilst screaming that envy is the deadliest of sins and that men’s bodies and eyes are not for controlling.
Playboy's Kendra Wilkinson
The Daily Mail regularly carries stories ‘proving’ how hot modern women over a certain age are.. sandwhiched between advertisements for beauty cream promising to make their (mainly over 40 and female) readers look 17 again, and news stories trimumphantly proclaiming that another pervert paedo has been rightly locked up for looking at pictures of 17 year old children in bikinis. But occasionally, in a kind of sado-masochistic manner, it does like to remind its aeging readers of the truth. This week it published a picture of the 1960′s supermodel Jean Shrimpton as she is today, the girl who once captivated playboy photographer David Bailey’s heart with her teenage beauty :
Jean Shrimpton today
Of course, this is a little cruel, especially for Jean Shrimpton, but in the Daily Mail’s case it is simply sado-masachistic cruelty as entertainment. The reason why I have the right to stress how ugly older women generally are is because older women are raping men through their legislation and hysterias that have little basis or justification other than sexual jealousy and bitterness at what nature has done to them, and where the free sexual market has left them. All the while, resting upon the pretence that men who prefer ripe fertile youth to old hags are subhuman perverted monsters. The only interesting question is why the male response has thus far been confined to a handful of ‘offensive’ blogs such as this one.
Meanwhile, the same paper reveals with indignation that most British women think that females over 35 are too old to wear mini-skirts.
I’ve noted here before that girls and women aged from 13 – 45 are going about everywhere these days in lycra leggings so thin and figure hugging that they may as well just be painting their bottoms and legs black. Men similarly garbed would be arrested for indecent exposure. Perhaps women should be as well, but only after a certain age. After all, I guess the justification for such indecent exposure laws is that such clothing would be outrageous and repulsive to most members of the opposite sex. But that’s equally true for men when the woman is over 30 and clothed in such skimpy attire.
Given that, as I revealed earlier, evolutionary psychology would predict that older women are more ‘harmed’ by casual sex than teenage girls would be, perhaps it’s time to switch the focus from the supposed sexualisation of girls (actually the enforced de-sexualisation of teenage girls by their older rivals), to the sexualisation of older women, embodied in the ‘Cougar’ phenomenon? Should we introduce a maximum age of consent for women? Should we arrest any woman over 30 who wears semi-transparent leggings in the street or wears skimpy bikinis on the beach? What age would mark the right cut off point?
Loading ...Hell hath no fury……like the woman at the 7:20 mark of this hilarious pick-up artist video from the inspirational and inimitable Krauser PUA.