Tag : David Futrelle

David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year 2017

Paedocrite – A person (usually male) who accuses other men of being paedophiles in order to deflect attention away from their own sexual attraction to ‘minors’, whether adolescents (attraction to whom is normal), or actual pre-pubescent children (a real paedophile). (shortened version – paedoc)

What a fu***ng paedocrite!!!


Turkey Rejects David Futrelle’s Controversial Child Rape Bill

The Turkish government has rejected a controversial bill that would have made their country the first in the world to implement the proposal, first made by disgraced blogger David Futrelle, that child rapists should be pardoned if they agree to marry their victims.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38061785

Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim has withdrawn a bill that pardons men convicted of sex with underage girls if they have married them.
The bill, part of a package of amendments to the legal system, was sent back for further work just hours before a final vote in parliament.
It had sparked protests across Turkish society and was condemned abroad.
Critics said it would legitimise statutory rape and encourage the practice of taking child brides.

The notorious anti-male rights advocate David Futrelle, who has also campaigned for the legalization of gay child snuff porn, first mooted the controversial suggestion back in the 1990s in an article for liberal feminist magazine SALON :

One wonders what Pat would have thought of the Orange County, Calif., social workers who have been helping teenage girls in their charge — some of them as young as 13 — to get married to the men who have impregnated them, rather than trying to get the men arrested on charges of statutory rape.

The story has become a roiling controversy. Imagine! A government agency serving as a matchmaker for sexual predators! “Helping pregnant 13-year-olds to marry the men who have physically and sexually abused them will result not only in continued abuse of the adolescent, but there is strong evidence that it will soon result in abuse to the child,” a professor of social work complained in an angry letter to the Los Angeles Times. “And when the marriage ends with additional children and more abuse, will Orange County Social Services create a dating service for abusive men to cycle them into new relationships with troubled adolescents?”

Questions like these prompted Orange County (one of the most Republican in the country) to retreat from its matchmaker role. But the details of the cases cause one to pause a moment. Thirteen-year-old Isabel Gomez told social workers she truly loved her 20-year-old boyfriend. Isabel’s mother — herself only 29 — is convinced her daughter’s troubled life has improved dramatically since he stepped into her life.
Since the marriage, she told the Los Angeles Times, “everything is much better.”
The situation, admittedly, is far from ideal. But would Isabel Gomez be better served if the father of her child was behind bars?

That’s a harder question to answer. Two-thirds of all teen
pregnancies involve adult men, and we can’t put them all in jail.

http://theantifeminist.com/when-david-futrelle-suggested-13-year-old-child-rape-victims-should-be-encourged-to-marry-the-paedophiles-who-raped-them-who-would-be-spared-jail/


David Futrelle Biography

I recently came across a biography of child snuff porn advocate David Futrelle at Encyclopedia Dramatica published several months back. It wasn’t written by me but hats off to whoever it was who did pen it, as it’s an accurate and extensive look at the child abuse apologist’s career, spanning his early obsession with paedophilia, rape, torture, and extreme child pornography back as a ‘sex positive’ journalist in the early 1990’s, right up to his present incarnation as Manboobz, running a website dedicated to denying that men and boys have any rights in society, and that has a readership of mostly transvestite paedophiles posing as feminists, one of which runs a forum dedicated to fantasies of the rape, torture and murder of women and schoolgirls, apparently with the knowledge and blessing of Fraudtrelle himself, and others who doxx the children of leading MRAs.

jacques futrelle david futrelle
David Futrelle, grandson of Thinking Machine author Jacques Futrelle

Here’s an excerpt :

Between 1990 and the early 00s, David amassed an “impressive” catalogue of articles ranging from arguing for the lowering of the age of consent and defending child prostitution, to saying children should be forced to marry their rapists instead of sending the rapists to jail, to saying internet child porn should be de-regulated and even going so far as to write this following article attacking children who come forward to report their abuse, urging others not to believe them.
“Child rape victims are all a bunch of liers!”
Back in 1996, this madman and complete nutjob actually wrote an article on how most child abuse cases are fake, and how you should not believe children if they told about an incident. This experience would later prove helpful when defending child molester Sarah Butts.

Definitely well worth a read, if you can stomach it. Something that I found refreshing about this particular piece on Futrelle was the fact that the author doesn’t attempt to distance himself/herself from this site, even correctly pointing out the absurdity of Futrelle accusing myself and other MRAs of being ‘paedophiles’ for objecting to current feminist definitions of the term, given his disturbing history of defending real depraved child abuse.

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/David_Futrelle


‘Anti-Paedophile’ Campaigner Simon Danczuk Named David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year 2015

In a stunning last minute grab for inglory, leading Paedo-Finder General anti-paedophile campaigner Simon Danczuk has been named winner of the David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year Award for 2015!!!

On the last day of 2015, the British media widely reported that Danczuk, who had led a campaign of digging up respected and dead politicians out of their graves and forcing the police to declare them to be possessed by the nonce spirit, admitted sending perverted and sexually explicit texts to a 17 year old schoolgirl, including texts that revealed his fantasy of spanking the young tender innocent bottom of such a vulnerable child. The Labour party, which introduced laws under Tony Blair which makes it a criminal offence to look at a photo of a 17 year old girl in so much as a revealing bikini, let alone being spanked by a middle-aged paedo-finder general, immediately (though no doubt grudgingly) suspended the ‘paedophile’ hypocrite from their party.

simon-danczuk

What a f***ing paedocrite!!!

In second place is disgraced blogger David Futrelle. The Chicago gay child snuff torture porn apologist did everything he could in 2015 to make the title his again, but staying loyal to a transvestite commentator at his site who openly runs a forum devoted to sharing fantasies of crucifying, torturing, murdering, and raping women and schoolgirls just wasn’t enough in the light of Simon Danczuk’s stunning paedocrisy. Nor was even encouraging his perverted paedophile transvestite sadistic groupies to doxx his opponents, including the six year old daughter of a leading MRA.

david-futrelle

What a f***ing paedocrite!!

I’m sure we can look forward to a stunning year of paedocrisy in 2016, with hopefully some of the other paedo finder generals and ‘vigilantes’ being outed as the sick furtive paedophile hypocrites that most of them no doubt are.

In the meantime, HAPPY NEW YEAR to all my (5) readers!!

On a final note – Jonathan King framed the fine and ignoble art of paedocrisy very well with regard to the Danczuk scandal :

When I was released 10 years ago one of the decent police “keeping an eye” on me asked me to let him know the URLs of trolls – I just deleted and ignored them. “It’s always the ones who shout loudest who are secret abusers” he said. “They think it covers them – it doesn’t. It exposes them”. It was the same in prison – the boys shouting NONCE were always found to be the worst abusers, in there for precisely the crimes they claimed to loathe. Write a book about a dead man being a paedophile? You’re guaranteed to find karma very quickly. Didn’t we all wonder about Karen?

http://www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=65&func=view&catid=2&id=141460

Previous winners of the David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year Award:

2008 : David Futrelle

2009 : David Futrelle

2010 : David Futrelle

2011 : David Futrelle

2012 : David Futrelle

2013 : David Futrelle

2014 : Lena Dunham


David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year 2015 Nominations Invited

It’s that time of year again when we sort through hundreds of loathsome contenders and decide upon a select few worthy candidates for the ignominious title of the most disgusting paedocrite in the world.

Readers are invited to leave their nominations in the comments section below. I’m very busy at the moment so I’m not sure if I’ll run the femihag of the year poll, but you can leave nominations for that as well. I was even thinking of adding a ‘paedo-finder general of the year’ award, but not only do I not have time but I’m not sure I have enough readers left to make running more than one poll worthwhile. But feel free to leave your paedo-finder nominations as well.  I’ll add every valid nomination left in the comments section and start the actual poll/s in the New Year.

david-futrelle (2)
David Futrelle

David Futrelle – The ‘child torture snuff porn can be art’ advocate sunk to new depths of paedocrite depravity, seemingly determined to regain his title at all costs after last year’s stunning reversal at the hands of child abuser Lena Dunham.  The discredited Chicago blogger still refuses to withdraw his support for the ‘right’ of gay sex shops to openly disseminate as fap material paedophile produced images of naked children being anally raped, forced to eat shit, and then graphically and slowly tortured to death. But even worse, he chose to stay loyal to his favourite transvestite sadistic paedophile reader – ‘ralmcg’ – months after I revealed that the pervert ran a forum dedicated to sharing fantasies of crucifying, raping, torturing, and murdering women and schoolgirls. Things took on an even more sinister turn when Futrelle’s paedophile sadist followers started doxxing opponents of the Chicago gay child porn apologist, including the 6 year old daughter of a leading MHRA. Futrelle also fed his depraved bdsm transvestite groupies a link to the doxxed real identity of female anti-feminist ‘Judgy Bitch’.. Both Futrelle and Ralmcg are currently under investigation by the FBI.  WHAT A FU**ING PAEDOCRITE!!

astrokidnjAstroKid NJ – The MHRA with the creepy handle that says it all.  When reading some of AstroKid’s comments validating feminist child abuse laws, you get the strong impression that all he wants to do is sodomize really young boys, but knows it will never be legal in his lifetime, and thus takes out his frustration by victim labelling 17 year old students lucky enough to have had sex with their female teachers, as well as shaming true MRAs for admitting that attraction to teenage girls is part of normal male sexuality and only criminalized because of feminists.  WHAT A FU**ING PAEDOCRITE!!

ferdinand-bardemuThe Ghost of Ferdinand Bardemu – The ghost of Ferdinand Bardemu.

WHAT A FU**ING PAEDOCRITE!!

 

jonJon – Whilst not technically a paedocrite perhaps, reader Jon was definitely getting into dangerous territory.  WHAT A FU**ING PAEDOCRITE!!

 

facebook-profile-picThe Anti-feminist – The loathesome slug of a webmaster hardly bothered to post all year, and even then not all of his posts concerned the age of consent.  As this site sunk further into manosphere obscurity, the obvious ephebohebophebophile was even seen extolling the virtues of women in their mid-twenties!

WHAT A FU**ING PAEDOCRITE!!

 

Femi-hag of the year nominations :

Kathleen Richardson (sexbot ban woman), woman who tried to have Roosh banned from Canada (can’t remember her name), Angela Merkel (for rushing forward the Femislamization of Europe), Alison Saunders (for continuing to undermine the principles of British justice, and in persecuting old age pensioners for alleged sex ‘crimes’ that may or may not have taken place up to half-a-century ago).

Paedo-Finder General of the year nominations :

‘Hunter Stinson’ (anti-‘paedophile’ vigilante), Jim Gamble, Mark Williams Thomas (‘exposer’ of Jimmy Savile)

Mangina of the year nominations :

Erik Billing (sex bot ban Swedish mangina), David Futrelle

 

 


More insight into David Futrelle’s ‘Classic’ Child Torture Porn Movie ‘Salo’

david-futrelle
Here’s an intresting (and extremely disturbing) IMDB bio of one of the underage cast of 1975 child sexploitation torture porn movie Salo, made by the notorious pederast director Pasolini, often described as the most sickening and depraved film ever made, and a video that David Futrelle thinks is suitable to be rented out in gay sex shops.

Franco Merli was born on October 31, 1956 in Rome, Italy. In 1973, famous Italian poet and filmmaker Pier Paolo Pasolini discovered the youngster. The 16-year-old was working as a gas station attendant at that time (as Ninetto Davoli, a friend of Pasolini and actor in most of his films, recounts). Pasolini was searching for a young man to play the lead in his upcoming feature Arabian Nights (Arabian Nights (1974)). The director immediately knew that Franco Merli, with his small but muscular physique, dark Mediterranean looks, and ready smile, was the perfect choice for the role of Nur Ed Din.

Arabian Nights was an international success and Merli got a taste for the film business. Following his debut he appeared (his hair dyed blond) in La collegiale (1975), a rather stupid soft-sex-comedy that did little for his reputation other than showing that he was able to play an unsympathetic character, as well.

In 1975 Pasolini hired him once again, for the role of one of the male victims in his infamous Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom (1975) or the 120 Days of Sodom (Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma). In this film, Merli was, like the other non-professional actors, addressed by his real first name, Franco. The director chose Merli once again, not only because he embodied the “Pasolini-type” to a fault but also because the young actor had already proven in Arabian Nights that he was perfectly comfortable appearing nude in front of a camera. In a way, Salò made Franco’s face immortal since one of the most highly publicised images of the film was the close-up of young Merli as his tongue is cut out in the final torture scenes. Another famous still (from the scene where the victims are forced to pose as dogs) prominently showed Franco naked, on all fours, only ‘wearing’ a dog collar – a fact that didn’t help further his career.

In 1976, Merli appeared on-screen as Fernando, the son of Nino Manfredi, who earns his money as a transvestite prostitute in Down and Dirty (Ugly, Dirty and Bad (1976)). This brilliant social satire by Italian director Ettore Scola was also (but for a small part in Il malato immaginario (1979)) Franco Merli’s swan song as an actor. Incidently, it is probable that he secured the role of Fernando thanks to his connection with Pasolini, since the director not only was a friend of Scola but also had been supposed to write a foreword to the film – but Pasolini was murdered before this came to pass.

Since Merli’s mentor had died and his choice of roles (or perhaps the ones he got offered) had been a rather off-beat one, he soon didn’t find work in the industry anymore, even though he had shown himself to be a versatile actor with a range from pure innocence to debauchery. And the fact that, as said above, he had become the “face” and “body” of Salò probably didn’t help, either.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0580989/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

Although it has been documented on several sites that the cast of torture victims in Salo were aged 14 – 18, it’s difficult to track down their actual birthdates on English language websites and the IMDB only lists several.

As Franco Merli, the actor described above, was born in late 1956, and Salo was filmed in 1974 (and released in 1975), it’s almost certain that he would have been under 18 during filming.

Sergio Fascetti, another male cast member subjected to sickening acts of perversion and torture during the film, was born on July 04 1958.
At most, he would have been 16 during filming, and possibly 15. Sergio killed himself at only 31 years of age, presumably haunted at the thought of thousands of gay middle-aged men continuing to fap away at the torture of his naked child’s body.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0268668/

Another of the cast – Antiniska Nemour – was born in May 1957, thus again HAD TO BE under 18 at the time she was filmed naked eating shit by the pervert Pasolini.
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiniska_Nemour

The Director of the sick movie – Pasolini – began his career as a school teacher but was quickly banned from teaching after being caught multiple times molesting the children under his care. Later, he was caught and charged for indecency with children 16 and under :

A small scandal broke out during a local festival in Ramuscello (September 1949). “A public voice”, someone who overheard comments, informed Cordovado, the local sergeant of the carabinieri, on sexual conduct (masturbation) shown by Pasolini with three youngsters aged 16 and younger after dancing and drinking.[10] Cordovado went on to summon the boys’ parents, who hesitated, but did not file any lawsuit, despite Cordovado’s enthusiasm. However, the sergeant drew up a report, and the informer elaborated publicly on his accusations, sparking a public uproar. The judge of San Vito al Tagliamento charged Pasolini with “corruption of minors and obscene acts in public places”[11][12] Not only him, but the 16 year-old involved was also indicted.[13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pier_Paolo_Pasolini#Success_and_charges

In 1966, at the age of 44, he openly took a 15 year old boy actor as his lover, who he had cast in one of his films in order to ‘groom’.

Not his most well known but a very important movie in PIER PAOLO PASOLINI’s oeuvre as it is his first starring his young lover, the 15 year old Nino (Ninetto) Davoli who became the love of his life, raising so many controversies.

https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/uccelini-e-uccellaci

This guy was a worse child abuser than Jimmy Savile, Gary Glitter, and Sadowski combined, yet David Futrelle, who makes a career out of trying to criminalize the notion that teenage boys experience a lack of rights in society, believes that a film of his containing nothing but graphic images of children (mainly boys) being raped and tortured to death is suitable for gay sex shops. Futrelle’s defence of Salo as gay sex shop material is shared by the vast majority of his transvestite followers.

david-futrelle-2.jpg
Disturbing – the real face of David Futrelle

Perhaps even more disturbing than Futrelle’s support for Salo, is his quite staggering show of loyalty for a perverted transvestite reader of his (one of many) who moderates a forum devoted to sharing fantasies of crucifying, raping, torturing, and murdering women and schoolgirls. Not only did Futrelle refuse to condemn him after I revealed what ‘RalMCG’ was, he publicly threatened to have ME murdered. Ralmcg STILL commentates at Futrelle’s site.

Despite many of Futrelle’s cult like followers being paedophile sadists who openly fantasize over the sexual murder of women and children, Futrelle continues to encourage them to doxx his opponents, including last week the 6 year old daughter of a leading MRA. He also recently allowed a link in his comments section that led to a blog run by one of his transvestite sadists that contained the real identity of the female mra ‘JudgyBitch’.  Futrelle is currently under investigation by the FBI for this.

MHRAs – you really need to address this. This isn’t just about showing that you care about boys, it’s about protecting your own children and families from these sadistic freaks.


David Futrelle Still Allowing a Paedophile Sadist Who Fantasises about Crucifying Women and Girls to Comment at his Site

david-futrelle-2.jpg
David Futrelle

David Futrelle, the disgraced blogger and child scat torture gay porn apologist, recently updated his comments policy after use of certain words were causing ‘triggers’ and other offence amongst his easily offended readers. In particular, regular commentators at the site were reminded to choose their words carefully when describing mental illness. Understandable, perhaps, given that many of his commentators appear to be clearly mentally ill. But along with banning words such as ‘crazy’, the disgraced Chicago blogger Futrelle has made a particular point of warning his followers not to use the term ‘psycho’. This might explain why a transvestite sadist who runs a sick forum devoted to the sharing of fantasies of torturing and crucifying women and schoolgirls is still allowed to comment at WeHuntedTheMammoth, nearly a year after I made public here exactly what he was.

David Futrelle Fury
David Futrelle reacted with fury when I revealed his favourite transvestite sadist was a paedophile psychopath

When I first exposed ‘RalMCG’ as a pervert who openly helps moderate a truly sick bdsm forum that specialises in the rape, torture, and crucifixion of women and girls, Futrelle appeared to react with fury – vowing revenge by publicly pledging support to a woman who had threatened to track me down and kill me (note that I had not doxxed ralmcg at all – he openly uses the same handle at Futrelle’s site as elsewhere online, including the perverted bdsm forum).

It is certainly beyond question that Futrelle must have been aware of my article, as must have many of his readers. For a couple of months after the piece was published here, Ralmcg appeared to go silent at Fraudtrelle’s site, and I assumed that the ManBoobz had had the sense to ban him, albeit quietly and grudgingly. But that’s not the case. RalMCG has been back commenting again, using the very same account as before, only this time he has a new avatar, which again features the pervert wearing his favourite ‘Daisy Dukes’ in order to show off his hairy legs. Disturbingly, he appears also to be wearing a t-shirt that, at first glance at least, looks like it is splattered in blood.

ralmcg-june-15

Although RalMCG claims to be concerned with victims of rape, you wouldn’t guess so from the comments he leaves at the sick bdsm forum of which he is ‘assistant executioner’.  In fact, the idea of women and girls being raped along with being tortured, and even murdered, is evidently a sexual obsession.

ralmcg-3

None of Futrelle’s other commentators, many of whom appear to be sadistic male transvestites like Ralmcg, rather than genuine feminists, seem to have any problem with him at all, despite a number of them being aware of my article. Perhaps unsurprising, as most of those commentators strongly support Futrelle’s view that a paedophile made video – SALO – that features nothing but graphic images of naked children being raped and tortured to death, should be allowed to be distributed as fap material in gay sex shops.

http://theantifeminist.com/david-futrelles-groupies-and-their-child-torture-porn-apologia-oh-sorry-ephebophile-torture-porn-apologia/

ralmcg-google-2

ralmcg-google-1

Note that David Futrelle’s attacks on the ‘manosphere’ played a key role in the decision of the left-wing extremist group – the SLPC – to characterize the men’s rights movement as a ‘hate movement’.  This in turn is being used at this moment in attempts to ban Roosh V from speaking on men’s issues in  Canada.

david-futrelle-11 (2)
Disgraced blogger and child scat torture gay porn apologist David Futrelle – greatgrandson of ‘The Thinking Machine’ author Jacques Futrelle

Yet David Futrelle, great grandson of ‘The Thinking Machine’ author Jacques Futrelle, jokes about ‘dumb’ policemen who believe that videos depicting children being tortured, raped, and murdered are not valid fap material for gay sex shops.  Not only this, be continues to allow a sadistic paedophile transvestite who openly fantasizes over the torture, rape and murder of women and children to comment at his site.

Futhermore, readers at his site regularly incite violence and make threats against MRAs that go well beyond the ‘hate’ seen anywhere in the manosphere.  Here is just one example published on his blog recently :

monopole

The reader – Monopole – approvingly quotes a male celebrity justifying the shooting and murder of men by women.  Yesterday, I highlighted how Futrelle was allowing readers to call for Roosh V to have toxic and potentially lethal chemicals thrown over him.

WeHuntedtheMammoth, is not only a hate site, but something even worse than that.  It appears to be a shelter for those who sexually fantasize about the torture, rape, and murder of children, women, and men.

 


David Futrelle Publishes Incitement to Violence Against Roosh V

 

david-futrelle-11 (2)
David Futrelle

David Futrelle is publishing numerous comments at his site approving of criminal violent acts against Roosh V and his supporters, and encouraging feminists in Canada to engage in further illegal acts, including the use of toxic chemical substances.

david-futrelle-inciting-violence-2

david-futrelle-inciting-violence

Although describing Roosh or anybody else as ‘mentally ill’ breaks Futrelle’s commenting guidelines, proposing that Roosh has toxic and potentially lethal chemicals thrown over him is fine :

futrelle-incitement-2

Tellurium compounds are a class of extremely toxic and potentially life threatening chemicals :

futrelle-inctement-3

 

David Futrelle regularly publishes comments from his readers that incite or encourage violence against MRAs and other men. Recently, he published a reader’s comment that approvingly quoted a male celebritiy justifying extreme acts of violence and even murder against men by women.

monopole

David Futrelle’s website ‘ManBoobz’ was used as a primary source by the Southern Law Poverty Group’s designation of men’s rights and pick-up sites as constituting a ‘hate movement’, something that is being used in the attempts by Canadian feminists to ban Roosh from speaking in Canada. David Futrelle himself has a history of vile child abuse apologia, the worst of which was his defence of the sale in a gay sex shop of a video containing nothing but images of naked children being anally raped, tortured, disemboweled and murdered.


MHRA Child Torture Porn Apologists

David Futrelle has infamously defended the gay sex shop distribution of a paedophile made ‘classic’ child torture movie featuring real and naked 14 year old boys ‘acting’ in a film in which they are made to eat excrement, anally raped, tortured and murdered. No surpises there. After all, Futrelle is simply following in the footsteps of other notable male feminists such as Kyle Payne, jailed for sexually assaulting a sleeping schoolgirl who was in his care and then again for downloading kiddy porn, and Hugo Schwyzer, a sex predator who admits that he once tried to murder his girlfriend.

What is more disturbing, is that many MHRAs share Futrelle’s sick views on videos of naked children being tortured being rented out in gay sex shops.

Over a 20 year period, Futrelle has steadfastly refused to apologise for his defence of Salo and continues to justify the film’s sale in a gay porn store on the grounds that, obscenely, the sick movie can be viewed on Netflix and YouTube. This is a man who has gone on record to claim that a picture of a 17 year old girl in jeans is clearly ‘child porn’ in the context of a ‘jailbait’ subreddit or forum and that those who view such legal pictures are ‘paedophiles’.

Of course, many so-called MHRAs share Futrelle’s feminist views on the definition of child porn, as well as the feminist age of consent, or at least publicly claim to do so, whatever their disturbing motivations are. Laws which in the UK and elsewhere are currently leading to witch hunts against men, a spike in the male suicide rate, and the undermining of any semblance of justice. However, even more disturbingly, many of them appear to share Futrelle’s views on the distribution in a gay sex shop of a movie that graphically depicts nothing else but the torture, rape, and murder of naked children. A movie directed by a man who turned to filmmaking after losing his job as a teacher due to molesting the children, and who was infamous for handpicking beautiful young 14 and 15 year old boys to star in his movies and immediately embarking upon sexual affairs with them.

Last night I had yet another MHRA leave a comment on this site denouncing us as ‘pedobears’ for admitting what every man knows – that teenage girls can be sexy – and for attacking the logic of the feminist age of consent laws that are leading to a clear sexual holocaust against men, things that any real supporter of men’s rights should do. The same MHRA, like several others, made a point of defending SALO and, by implication, Futrelle’s support for the movie’s sale in a gay sex shop. Unfortunately, this MHRA was too cowardly to leave his regular handle, but several others have not been so shy and have openly supported a gay child torture porn movie both here and elsewhere in the MRM. I thought it would be useful to start compiling a list of MHRA child torture porn apologists here. This will be a sticky page, and I’ll update it regularly as these staunch defenders of the rights of boys continue to support the idea of gay men fapping off to naked 14 year boys being anally raped and then made to eat their abuser’s shit before being tortured slowly to death.

I must make it clear that not all MHRAs support Futrelle over the ‘right’ of gay men to rent videos of naked underage boys being raped and murdered in gay porn shops. In fact, a small minority have actually spoken out and attacked Futrelle over the matter. Janet Bloomfield (JudgyBitch) obviously stands out, to her eternal credit. And Paul Elam and Dean Esmay themselves, have also condemned Futrelle a couple of times, as they should (in fact, they should be a little louder).

Let’s start with our old friend ‘Kloo2Yoo’.

Kloo2Yoo (former moderator of r/mensrights). The clueless subhuman paedocrite Kloo2Yoo once reported a men’s rights redditor to the FBI for uploading a famous photograph that has appeared on Hallmarks cards to the men’s rights subreddit. Consisting of the image of a little girl lifting up her skirt to a bewitched little boy, with a caption that said something along the lines of ‘with this I will have power over you always’. It was clearly a relevant men’s rights image and any sane rational person without something disturbing to hide would see it as such. But not Kloo2Yoo, who immediately denounced it as child porn and claimed to have reported to the FBI the MRA who posted the link to the picture.

After the low IQ Kloo2Yoo finally realised he was out of his depth running the fast growing men’s rights subreddit, and handed over moderation rights to slightly more competent paedocrites, he seemed to disappear for a number of years. I assumed that the obvious hardcore paedocrite had been locked up, but no, he turned up out of the blue just at the moment we had David Futrelle on the rack over his defence of SALO, and proceeded to leave a rant in the comments section here defending it as a ‘classic’ art film. This is a man who reported an MRA to the FBI for linking to a Hallmark image with obvious men’s rights relevance. This is a man who banned anyone from the men’s rights reddit for questioning feminist child porn laws that jail men for looking at pictures of ‘young looking’ fairies and elves. This is a man who supported Futrelle in claiming that legal images of fully clothed teens can constitute ‘child porn’ if they are viewed in a ‘sexual context’, and yet, like Futrelle, he sees no problem in the distribution of a movie in a gay sex shop featuring nothing but naked children being raped, tortured, made to eat human faeces, disembowelled, and murdered.

Perhaps ‘pedobears’ isn’t quite the right word for these MHRA child torture porn apologist freaks. Perhaps not even ‘paedocrites’. Maybe ‘pedowolves’, or ‘pedopsychos’, ”pedosnakes’, ‘pedofreaks’, or simply ‘real sadistic paedophile sickos’?

Uchuu – ‘Uchuu’ is another sick MHRA freak who has taken issue with the esteemed JudgyBitch for daring to call out David Futrelle over his defence of gay paedophile torture porn.

http://judgybitch.com/2015/03/27/david-futrelle-redefines-the-words-sick-motherfucker/comment-page-1/#comment-84381

Meh, after reading a summary and some background on the movie, the link rather reads like character assassination. Don’t get me wrong, I so far have nothing good to say about Futrelle, but the movie apparently had just as many female victims as male ones (so, the focus on the “boys” of the article seems dishonest), it wasn’t actually documented child abuse, but something fictional, and I’ve seen no real good argument connecting that one suicide to the filming of the movie. The contents are disgusting enough that I never want to see it, but supposedly it actually has some artistic qualities, so the free speech argument is not completely out of the blue.

Notice, in this one small paragraph, how ‘Uchuu’ resembles so many other child torture porn apologists, both MHRAs and Futrelle groupies. The idea that, because the movie contained naked 14 year old girls being slowly tortured to death, as well as boys, Futrelle’s defence of its distribution in a gay sex shop is not a men’s rights issue. His defence of the movie as ‘artistic’ (not sure how he feels about the fact that, technically, men in Europe could be jailed by feminists for simply reading Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita). Finally, note his love of manga, revealed by his username, no doubt of the hardcore violent rape variety that involves pre-pubescent girls.


Lena Dunham Voted the Most Disgusting Paedocrite of 2014

lena-dunham-paedocriteIt’s now official – David Futrelle has finally been dethroned and Lena Dunham has been voted the most disgusting paedocrite of 2014!

Here are the final results of the David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year 2014 Poll :

Who was the most disgusting paedocrite of 2014? Choose TWO paedocrites!

  • Lena Dunham (49%, 59 Votes)
  • David Futrelle (35%, 42 Votes)
  • Rolf Harris (7%, 8 Votes)
  • Max Clifford (4%, 5 Votes)
  • Inclined Reader (4%, 5 Votes)
  • RalMCG (2%, 2 Votes)

Total Voters: 82

Loading ... Loading ...
david futrelle
This is what a paedocrite looks like

Most seasoned paedoc watchers had predicted that David Futrelle would easily retain his crown – for the fourth straight year. The master paedocrite had indeed been in outstanding form – continuing to libel MRAs and others as paedophiles for discussing paedohysteria, however long ago, yet refusing to even acknowledge, let alone apologize for, an article he wrote in the 1990’s defending the sale of a child torture porn movie in a gay sex shop.  In the now notorious article, Fraudtrelle mocked American police officers for arresting the owners of the seedy gay ‘bookstore’ for distributing a disgusting video depicting the anal rape, forced shit eating, torture, disembowlement, and murder of naked children (played by real child actors, one of whom later killed himself). On top of that, Futrelle publicly called for the webmaster of this site to be murdered after I revealed that one of his regular commentators was a sadistic ‘transgender’ paedocrite  psychopath who openly moderated a sick fetish website devoted to men turned on by the thought of crucifying women and girls (no doxxing took place on my part – ‘ralmcg’ was moderating the sick forum  (as ‘assistant executioner’) under the same username as he uses at Manboobz). Futrelle will shortly be standing trial on incitement to murder charges over this.

Although Futrelle exceeded even his own disgusting paedocrite standards in 2014, what he couldn’t count on was a truly stunning display of paedocrisy from Lena Dunham. The American actress and social justice warrior openly boasted in her autobiography how she liked to peer inside the vagina of her one year old sister only weeks after ranting that millions of men who looked online at hacked naked pics of celebrities were all sex offenders (and presumably each one deserved to be anally raped in jail). To top it all, Dunham is now in hot water after it was revealed that rape accusations made in her book were entirely bogus and were causing unfounded suspicions to fall upon at least one innocent man.

david-futrelle-2.jpgDespite finally losing his crown, the monster of Chicago can take solace from the fact that he received over twice as many votes as he did last year when winning the trophy (for the fourth successive time).  In other words, more people than ever think that Futrelle is the most disgusting paedocrite in the world.  No doubt he will be back even stronger next year, determined to re-claim his throne, even if he has to do it from a prison cell.

Rolf Harris, the Australian entertainer convicted (on extremely dubious ‘evidence’) for abusing children, including a 4 year old, trailed well back in a distant third place.  At the time when he was (supposedly) molesting children, he had gone out of his way to produce a video warning kids that all adults were potential perverts and paedophiles.  An undoubted master paedocrite in action, it was Rolf’s misfortune to have run up against a pair of paedocs who truly turned in ungodly performances in 2014.

To add to Futrelle’s humiliation, his transgender sadistic disciple ‘Ralmcg’ could only finish in last place.


Legal Action Against David Futrelle the Child Torture Porn Apologist

David Futrelle
David Futrelle
Over the last couple of days, David Futrelle, the Chicago child torture porn apologist, has made what amounts to a public incitement of violence against my person. He has also publicly declared support for a woman who has been making violent threats against myself and my readers here – criminal threats which Futrelle must have been aware of. I have to take these threats seriously and will be seeking criminal charges against Futrelle in the coming months, as well as legal action over his repeated defamatory writings stretching back at least 5 years. Not only is this necessary for my protection, it means that at last, in a court of law, we can get to the bottom of why David Futrelle continues to refuse to even acknowledge the fact that he mocked American police officers for thinking it was inappropriate for a video depicting naked children being anally raped, made to eat shit, disemboweled, and tortured to death, to be rented out in a seedy gay sex shop.

To the handful of men’s human rights activists who occasionally attack Futrelle over his child torture porn apologia – please note the last sentence of the previous paragraph. It does not matter that in the sick minds of ‘left-wing’ social justice warriors, a film made by a left-wing homosexual gratuitously depicting naked 14 year old boys eating shit and then being slowly tortured to death is considered by them ‘classic’ art.

The fact is, David Futrelle attacked the police for removing it from sale in a gay sex shop.

David Futrelle is going to have to explain why he defended its sale in a sex shop. The prosecuters are not going to go gently on him on this. When he comes out with his lazy rehearsed defence of ‘it’s classic art…it shows how bad fascism is’..the prosecution are not going to let him off the hook and just fall silent like the tweets of an MHRA. They’re going to ask

all very well Mr Futrelle, but why did you mock the police for removing a video depicting the torture and abuse of real, naked, and underage children, from a gay sex shop – ‘classic’ or not?

In court, Futrelle is also going to face questions over the following :

In the same year as his sickening defence of ‘Salo’, he wrote an article lambasting a feminist for refusing to admit that we all harbor secret fantasies to torture and abuse other people. He also claimed that the primary means of expressing these fantasies was through watching them being played out on film and in news reports of serial killers and other monsters.

This was also the same year that John Wayne Gacy, another Chicago resident, was arrested for the sadistic murders of young boys.

Several of the male feminist (or ‘transgender’) readers at his site MammothBoobz appear to be sadistic psychopaths and hardcore paedophiles – one of them is ‘assistant executioner’ at a BDSM forum catering for men who fantasize about crucifying women and girls. Since I reported this here, Futrelle has not publicly condemned his reader and it is not clear if he has even been banned, but instead it appears to have motivated him to make a public incitement of violence against me.

David Futrelle also wrote an article claiming that the ‘innocence’ of female victims of abuse is ‘exaggerated’ and that abusers are unfairly demonized.

He also regularly wrote articles denouncing child sex abuse hysteria, accusing leading child protection charities of lying about the extent of ritual sexual abuse. In another article, he discussed sympathetically whether statutory rapists should often be encouraged to marry their victims, even using the term ‘we can’t send them all to jail’. Today, he regularly libels men’s rights activists and even the likes of Richard Dawkins as ‘paedophiles’ and ‘child abuse apologists’ for discussing the same topics. He even wrote an article mocking the idea of child welfare being a subject of political concern – even appearing to mock the ‘innocence’ of child victims of AIDS.

David Futrelle has repeatedly libeled Warren Farrell over a disputed word in one interview made nearly half a century ago. Not only clearly insinuating that he is a paedophile in the tone of his articles attacking Farrell, but by his use of the tag ‘paedophiles…oh sorry ephebophiles’ underneath every article he writes about him. He has used this tag when attacking myself or any other MRA who even mentions feminist laws on ‘child protection’ as well as in stories relating to real paedophiles. If either Warren Farrell or Richard Dawkins chooses to sue him for defamation, he would not have a legal leg to stand on. Similarly, he is no legal position to seek defamation charges against others for suggesting that he, in fact, is a paedophile, by his own logic, for having regularly in his past career as a ‘sex positive’ journalist discussed critically the feminist narrative on child sex abuse and teenage sexuality.

David Futrelle clearly incited violence against Warren Farrell at the recent men’s rights conference in Detroit, using that same disputed interview given nearly half-a-century ago. Farrell is obviously now an old man, subjected to intimidation and attempted violence at previous speaking engagements on men’s rights. Futrelle clearly tried to incite similar and greater violence against him and other attendees at the conference using insinuations that Farrell was a paedophile and a ‘paedophile apologist’. Again, if Farrell chooses to take legal action against Futrelle over this, he will have an extremely strong case.

Fraudtrelle even recently boasted that it was not illegal to slander somebody as a rapist even if they are found innocent in the eyes of the law by a court :

David Futrelle exists in a psychopathic fantasy world in which he can make a living from constantly slandering hundreds if not thousands of men and yet when one of his victims highlights past quotes that he has made, he threatens to sue for defamation because it might harm his chosen ‘career’ of making money out of trying to criminalize the very idea that men and boys have rights. He publicly promises to ‘assist’ a woman who has been screencapped making death threats against myself and my readers for simply highlighting a quote of hers made in a public space (erm..sound familiar David?).

The other day he exploited the latest tragic school shooting in America to slander the entire manosphere as potential murderers- which must number at least 100,000 individuals now, on the basis that…err…I’m not sure but something about the shooter having a penis and most of the manosphere having penises. No doubt he will be launching an early donation drive if he gets a spike in traffic from the mainstream media, just as he did when he took advantage of the Elliot Rodgers killings to spuriously link them to the MRM.

Unfortunately David Futrelle has crossed the line with me and he will be facing the consequences.


David Futrelle’s ‘Transgender’ Sadistic Paedocrite Groupie of the Week – RALMCG

We recently came to the awful realization here that an alarming number of David Futrelle’s faithful online groupies appear to be sadistic ‘transgender’ psychopaths, as well as hardcore paedocrites.  This is somewhat disturbing, to say the least, because David Futrelle himself has a 20 year history of defending the ‘right’ of a gay sex shop to rent out a film containing nothing but images of 14 year old child actors being forced to eat shit, anally raped, and then slowly tortured to death.  Futrelle has also repeatedly mocked the reality of child abuse in his career, claimed that the innocence of abuse victims is ‘exaggerated’, and even argued that we all harbour secret fantasies to torture and abuse others.

Today’s David Futrelle ‘ transgender’ sadistic paedocrite groupie of the week is ‘Ralmcg’.

***EXTREME TRIGGER WARNINGS***

Ralmcg is a regular commentator at David Futrelle’s site Manboobz oh sorry ‘We Hunted the Mammoth’.  David often allows it to indulge itself by uploading pictures of itself wearing skimpy denim shorts that reveal most of it’s hairy legs.  Social justice pan-sexual progressiveness…or something like that.

david-futrelle-ralmcg

 

ralmcg-manboobz-1

 

ralmcg-manboobz-3

Unfortunately, like a number of social justice transgender warrriors, ralmcg’s pan-sexual progressiveness appears to include a disturbing appetite for violent sexual fantasies – directed at just about anything that moves, be it man, woman, boy or girl. A quick Google of his Manboobz handle reveals that he is an ‘assistant executioner’ at a truly repulsive online bdsm forum that caters for perverts with a particularly sick fetish for crucifixion.

ralmcg-crux-forums

 

When another poster at the sick site offers to upload a book entitled ‘The Interrogation And Punishment Centre For Girls’, an impatient Ralmcg asks when it will be available in the archives :

punishment-for-girls

Bear in mind that all of David Futrelle’s readers joined with him in defending the renting out in a gay sex shop of a movie consisting solely of naked children being interrogated and brutally tortured, mainly on the grounds that the abused child actors were aged 14-17 and therefore ‘not really children‘. These same social justice warriors accuse anti-feminists of being paedophiles for criticising feminist laws that define young looking anime characters in bikinis as ‘child porn’….despite a curious number of them bizarrely choosing pre-pubescent anime characters as their public avatars.

Although male feminist RALMCG is heavily into fantasies involving crucifying women and interrogating and punishing schoolgirls, I think it’s fair to say that you wouldn’t want your teenage son to be anywhere within 100 miles of him either, given that he appears to have a thing for boys too :

From his Photobucket :

ralmcg-twink-paedocrite

 

From his YouTube :

ralmcg-youtube-pederast

 

I should also make it clear that I’m not doxxing anyone here.  These are all from profiles under the online identity of ‘transgender’ social justice warrior ‘ralmcg’.

Such psychopathic opportunistic males appear to be so confident in the protection that their supposed status as ‘transgenders’ or ‘male feminists’ gives them, that they barely feel the need to hide their sick perverted fantasies from the outside world.

And the disturbing thing is, they appear to be right.

David Futrelle - alleged psychopathic sadistic paedophile
David Futrelle – alleged psychopathic sadistic paedophile

David Futrelle and the Lynching of Sam Pepper

david-futrelle-torture
David Futrelle – Alleged sadistic paedophile psychopath

Sam Pepper is the YouTube prankster taking a lot of heat at the moment for a video he uploaded recently that features him pinching the bottoms of young women whilst using a fake hand (in his pocket) to blame passers by with.

A funny if rather crass video, and it was certainly naieve on his part not to realise that the feminazis would unleash hell against him as a result.

Over the last couple of days it’s turned into a real public lynching for young Sam Pepper (who still looks like and clearly has the personality of a teenage boy). Several female YouTubers and former fans of Sam have come out with claims that he sexually harassed them in the past, with one even alleging that he raped her.

Although no arrest has been made, and it’s not even clear whether there is any evidence against him, it hasn’t stopped the child torture porn apologist David Futrelle from accusing Mr Pepper of being a ‘rapist’. Not only that, but boasting of the right of himself and feminists to publicly accuse men of being rapists, even if they have been found innocent, let alone never been arrested. This is a ‘man’, remember, who continues to advocate for the right of gay sex shops to rent out ‘classic’ videos depicting actual 14 year old naked boys being anally raped, tortured, made to eat shit, and disembowlled, and who then threatens to sue for libel anybody who points out the depravity of that.

david-futrelle-rapist-slander

sam-pepper-alleged

There appears to be no evidence against Pepper other than the word of the women making the accusations. One such woman claims that he asked for nude photos of her when she was 15. Unfortunately for her, and for her expected increase in YouTube subscribers, the only ‘evidence’ she provides is a screenshot of a Facebook chat in which he (it is allegedly him in the chat although his name is not visible) asks her to simply show him some ‘photos’ of her (that they should be nude is not implied, let alone stated). Another scorned fan claims that he ‘groped’ her whilst on a date with him at a cinema, when she was 16, AFTER she had already let him kiss her, and despite the fact that she was above the British age of consent of 16.

Although there appears to be zero evidence against the man, under recent changes to guidelines given to the prosecution service in the UK, a man can be convicted of sexual abuse simply if enough women come out of the woodwork and accuse him of it, and their accounts of his behaviour broadly ‘match’. This is how Rolf Harris was convicted upon the basis of nothing other than the word of his accusers (all of whom will now recieve financial ‘compensation’). In the case of Sam Pepper, we are literally witnessing an online lynching and destruction of a young man’s life – with David Futrelle now attempting to act as the cheerleader.

In the light of David Futrelle’s continued defence of child torture porn being sold in gay sex shops, his repeated history of child abuse apologia, and his shocking article written in the same year as his child torture porn defence, in which he claims that we all have a secret urge to torture others – an urge that is only kept under control primarily by watching torture and murder on film, several observers have suggested that Futrelle is a sadistic paedophile with a particular fetish for the sexual abuse and torture of young boys.

It has also been noted that Futrelle’s public obsession with torture and child abuse reached a height in the same year that a fellow resident of Chicago – John Wayne Gacy – was arrested for the sadistic murder of numerous young boys.

However, I believe that a man is innocent until proven guilty. Let’s just hope the FBI are doing their job.

In the meantime, I would say that I do believe that David Futrelle is getting a sexual thrill from the online lynching of a young lad.

One Amazon review of the ‘classic’ that David Futrelle believes should be sold openly in gay sex shops, unhindered by the child protection concerns of ‘dumb’ policemen :

All biases aside, this film is nothing more than 117 minutes of continuous torture and sexual perversion directed at young people. Any socially responsible director can get his point across without feeling the need to wallow in this filth with child actors being violated in nearly every way possible . I have no doubt that Passolini either was getting his jollies out of the action being performed in front of his camera or was suffering great mental illness in order to allow his cast to be degraded in this way. It really is no wonder he was murdered shortly after completion of this film….As another reviewer has previously said this is an evil film and leaves an incredibly bad taste in ones mouth particularly when one realises they have partaken in this viewing experience willingly and contributed to the films revenue.


David Futrelle’s Groupies and their Child Torture Porn Apologia..Oh Sorry..Ephebophile Torture Porn Apologia

David Futrelle and his readers regularly make fun of the distinction, sometimes made in the manosphere, regarding paedophilia (the attraction to pre-pubescents) and ‘ephebophilia’ (the attraction to adolescent minors). It’s all the same to them. Finding a 5 year old sexy is no more perverse than finding a 17 year old attractive. Hmmm. It’s one thing a woman making such an obviously false claim, but when it comes from a ‘man’ like Futrelle, or one of his many male fake transexual fans..

Indeed, it appears that Futrelle’s groupies believe finding any minor attractive is paedophilia, including thefore a 19 or 20 year old in those countries with an age of majority of 21. David Futrelle and his wig wearing fans therefore belong to the minority of people who still regard Alan Turing as a paedophile pervert (he was caught banging a 19 year old boy in the bum when the age of majority in the UK, for both males and females, was 21).

While I agree that the notion of ephebophilia is aspie junk science nonsense (all men, apart from real paedophiles and other perverts, are attracted to adolescents), the insistance that there is no important difference between the attraction to pre-pubescents and post-pubescents is extremely dangerous. Of course, what is ‘natural’ is not always right, but to criminlize something natural under the pretence that it is perverted, is clearly a recipe for injustice. Furthermore, if you maintain the lie that it is unnatural and perverted, even sick, to find post-pubescent females attractive, then you risk turning healthy men into perverts who have internalized that slanderous paedophile label and then ran with it. Indeed, this appears to be what has happened with many of Futrelle’s child torture porn apologist ring members. Whilst publicly shaming men as ‘paeodphiles’ for admitting that 17 year olds can be sexy, many openly sport avatars of pre-pubescent anime characters. Others freely declare their unabashed love for extreme manga torture porn…and at least one or two actually create it. All of them, however, appear to defend the renting out in an adult sex shop of a disgusting ‘art’ film depicting nothing but the torture and murder of (real) naked children.

When concern for child welfare is simply a means to demonize men, financially enrich yourself, and regulate the free sexual market in your favour, and consequently you lie to men that to find the most desirable females attractive is paedophilia, equally as bad as the abuse of toddlers, then you open the door to an increase in real paedophilia and perversion. It’s hardly surprising, therefore, to find that so many of the mentally disturbed individuals and wig wearers amongst David Futrelle’s readership appear to be defending and even cultivating sick torture fantasies regarding children whilst libelling as paedophiles those who argue that giving consenting 17 year olds orgasms is neither child abuse nor paedophilia.

Currently, David Futrelle’s schizophrenic readers are simultaneously defending child torture porn as art to be sold in sex shops, on the grounds that the naked actors were sixteen, not six (the actors were actually as young as 14), and therefore ‘not really underage’, whilst mocking as paedophiles those of us who simply argue that teenage ‘minors’ are capable of consenting to sex.

scarlettpipstrelle-extreme-child-porn-apologist

Note that nobody, to my knowledge, has provided a link proving that ‘it won a court challenge’. Presumably Scarlettpipstrelle is referring to the arrest on obscenity charges of the gay sex shop owners who were renting it out on their premises. O.K, we have to accept the disgusting fact that, because Pasolini (the director) was a leftie and an ‘artist’, his films that involve non-stop gratuitous torture of naked 14 year old boys get a free pass to be viewed on YouTube and Netflix. However, even granting the hypocrisy and fake child welfare concern of the left, any civilised society draws the line at images of naked 14 year olds being tortured being rented out in adult sex shops. That includes the USA. These same readers were denouncing the ‘jailbait’ subreddit for displaying pictures of fully clothed teenage girls as ‘child porn’, and not only the men who viewed it, but MRAs who defended it, as ‘paedophiles’.

Maybe somebody should pop into that gay sex shop in Cincinnati and check whether they are still renting out a film containing naked children eating shit and being disembowelled, alongside all the other gay pornos, sex toys, and jack off material? I assume not, and only David Futrelle and his fellow child torture porn apologists are sick enough to ask ‘why not’?


David Futrelle asks ‘Who’s Afraid of Torture?’

David Futrelle - alleged psychopathic sadistic paedophile
David Futrelle – alleged psychopathic sadistic paedophile

Over the last few days, both MRAs and feminists have been demanding to know why exactly David Futrelle is continuing to invest so heavily into defending the renting out, in a gay sex shop, of a horrific film that depicts nothing but the brutal torture and humiliation of naked underage children. The following article, written in the very same year as his original defence of ‘Salo, 120 days of Sodom’, may give a clue as to his disturbing psychology. It consists of a book review of ‘The Politics of Cruelty’  by the feminist Kate Millett –  a work which discusses the use of torture by the state as a method of rule and which calls for more public pressure on those governments who persist in exmploying torture as a means of control.  Futrelle, however, seems more interested in attacking Millett for not admitting that she gets off on the torture and domination of others, just like…ermm…the rest of us.

**TRIGGER WARNINGS**

” The failure of Millett’s book is as much psychological as political: her writing is ultimately undone by her unwillingness to look beneath the surface, to look beyond her most immediate and obvious reactions. “Why does one study torture? Read about it, think about it, analyze and “obsess’ over it?” she writes. “Because of hating it, fearing it, having felt or imagined or somehow experienced it. Because of wanting to see it end.” This is a simple, logical, even honorable explanation–and an unconvincing one.

Millett sets up rigid boundaries between good and evil. But few of us are so pure: even the most fervent do-gooder may secretly nurture grandiose desires for power and control, and most of us have felt at least momentarily the thrill of violence–if only in the imagination. The media, from the nightly newscasts to the Saturday morning cartoons, are saturated with violence, and popular films offer a violent excitement as ritualized as that of a public execution.

If we are ever to eradicate cruelty and torture in the real world, we need to understand why they have such a hold over our imagination. And we could start by looking inward, beyond our shock. At one point Millett comes close to making such an argument, but then she retreats. In her eagerness to denounce the darkness in others, she studiously avoids acknowledging even the possibility of darkness in herself.

One can’t blame her for denouncing torture–and given the bestial nature of what she’s writing about, her indignant tone is hardly unforgivable. But denunciation is only a first step, and Millett is hardly the first to take it. Freud taught us that the only way to fully understand–and ultimately master–our darkest impulses is to bring them to the surface, to examine them coldly in the light of day. Millett has forgotten this lesson, and so deprives herself and her readers. She writes about horror, but is unwilling to look it in the face. “

Speak for yourself David.

http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/reading-whos-afraid-of-torture/Content?oid=884622

http://www.amazon.com/The-Politics-Cruelty-Literature-Imprisonment/dp/0393313123/

Futrelle expresses similar sentiments in another article published the same year (1994), in which he discusses an author’s ‘interesting and provocative’ claim that our fascination with the likes of Hannibal Lecter and Jeffrey Dahmer reveals that we all have a bit of these psychopathic muderers in our own moral and psychological make-up, and that the distinction between real and fictional murder, murder as news and murder as art, is becoming less clear.

pictures-at-an-exhibition

http://www.unz.org/Pub/InTheseTimes-1994feb07-00035

Just to clarify what a smoking gun this is. David Futrelle claimed that we all have a secret interest in torturing and violently dominating others, expressed primarily in viewing such torture and even murder (including in ‘art’), in the very same year he defended the renting out of Salo, a film which depicts nothing but the torture and murder of naked children, in a gay sex shop.


David Futrelle and the ‘co-ercive strategies controlling the sexual behaviour of YOUNG girls’

In reply to it becoming open knowledge that David Futrelle appeared to defend child prostitution and an age of consent of 12 or 13, he has quoted an obtuse passage from the book he was reviewing in his original infamous article that he wrote back in the 1990’s.

His pathetic defence begins by his claiming that he meant women when he said girls….even when he said ‘YOUNG girls’.

The rest of his ‘defence’ then blatantly contradicts this. Even though he means adult women when he refers to ‘young girls’, he then likens his statement regarding ‘co-ercive strategies’ to the modern abstinance movement…which is aimed at young girls…i.e. YOUNG GIRLS.

Take a look at the passage from his article yourself :

david-futrelle-age-of-consent-campaign

It is clear from the very quotes Futrelle took from Josephine Butler, that ‘co-ercive strategies’ is being used by both Butler and himself in reference to legal measures.  It only makes sense in a context of there also being ‘non-coercive’ strategies employed by the Butlerites (which would be akin to simply ‘encouraging’ abstinance and the like). The ONLY legal ‘co-ercive strategies’ that the Butlerites engaged in was to (successfully) campaign for the raising of the age of consent – raised from 13 to 16 in the 1885 Criminal Amendment Act, also subtitled ‘An act to make further provision for the protection of women and girls.

Any reasonable reader would interpret David Futrelle’s statement as referring to that act – the raising of the age of consent from 13 to 16 with the aim of ending child prostitution.  Particularly in the wider context of David Futrelle’s writings in the 1990’s, which often deal with the theme of abuse, and in particular child sexual abuse, with Futrelle often crudely mocking the very idea of it (including claiming that the innocence of victims of abuse is exaggerated in an article in which he compares child abuse victims to ‘victims’ of alien abduction).  Futrelle also once suggested that 13 year old statutory rape victims should be encouraged to marry the men who raped them.  He also worked alongside Judith Levine at the time, the world’s most famous ‘statutory rape apologist’ (as Fraudtrelle would now label her).  One of Futrelle’s articles is actually referenced in her book ‘Harmful to Minors’ which calls for the age of consent to be lowered back down to 12.


When David Futrelle Suggested 13 Year Old Child Rape Victims Should Be Encourged to Marry the Paedophiles Who Raped Them (Who would be spared jail)

If there is one consistant theme in David Futrelle’s writings of the 1990’s it is child abuse apologia.  Several of these articles have been discussed in the men’s rights sphere recently, but one very important piece, actually published by Salon, has still yet to be raised.  In the article, entitled ‘Sex and the Single Girl’, Futrelle appears to make the astonishing suggestion that statutory rape victims as young as 13 should be encouraged to marry the adults who raped them, who themselves would escape prison.

(TRIGGER WARNINGS) : http://www.salon.com/1996/09/09/news_536/

One wonders what Pat would have thought of the Orange County, Calif., social workers who have been helping teenage girls in their charge — some of them as young as 13 — to get married to the men who have impregnated them, rather than trying to get the men arrested on charges of statutory rape.

The story has become a roiling controversy. Imagine! A government agency serving as a matchmaker for sexual predators! “Helping pregnant 13-year-olds to marry the men who have physically and sexually abused them will result not only in continued abuse of the adolescent, but there is strong evidence that it will soon result in abuse to the child,” a professor of social work complained in an angry letter to the Los Angeles Times. “And when the marriage ends with additional children and more abuse, will Orange County Social Services create a dating service for abusive men to cycle them into new relationships with troubled adolescents?”

Questions like these prompted Orange County (one of the most Republican in the country) to retreat from its matchmaker role. But the details of the cases cause one to pause a moment. Thirteen-year-old Isabel Gomez told social workers she truly loved her 20-year-old boyfriend. Isabel’s mother — herself only 29 — is convinced her daughter’s troubled life has improved dramatically since he stepped into her life.
Since the marriage, she told the Los Angeles Times, “everything is much better.”
The situation, admittedly, is far from ideal. But would Isabel Gomez be better served if the father of her child was behind bars?

That’s a harder question to answer. Two-thirds of all teen
pregnancies involve adult men, and we can’t put them all in jail.

This was written by the same schizoid man who is threatening libel action over the suggestion that when he said Victorian feminists ‘used co-ercive strategies to control the sexual behaviour of young girls’, what he meant was that Victorian feminists ‘used co-ercive strategies to control the sexual behaviour of young girls’ – i.e. raised the age of consent from 12/13 to 16 in order to end child prostitution.

Perhaps David Futrelle needs to either shut up or simply apologize to his feminist readers for the things he wrote in the 1990’s.  As well as to Warren Farrell.


David Futrelle’s Libelling of Warren Farrell & Richard Dawkins

David Futrelle is continuing to defend the renting out in a gay sex shop of a sickening child torture porn movie that was directed by a paedophile and which involved real underage naked child actors, one of whom later killed himself.

His defence of his earlier comments on ‘Salo, 120 days of Sodom‘ rests on the fact that it has been included in several critic’s polls as a ‘classic’ film.

https://twitter.com/DavidFutrelle/statuses/496520933847203841

This is rather like defending a claim that drugging and then sodomizing 13 year old girls is acceptable on the grounds that a list of Hollywood celebrities defended Roman Polanski.

Furthermore, as I have previously noted, one of these oft quoted ‘critic’s polls’ was made by the Chicago Film Critics Association. You and your chums don’t happen to be members of that association by any chance David? Certainly seems to be something in the water in Chicago, at any rate, for a movie that depicts the graphic torture and murder of naked schoolboys to have been rated as ‘classic’ by residents of a city still in mourning for the victims of John Wayne Gacy.

Above all, Futrelle still avoids the fact that he was defending the film being rented out in a gay sex shop. Whether or not it does have any claim for artistic merit for the ‘cognoscenti’, it was clearly a pornographic child torture movie in the context of the gay adult book store – i.e. gay sex shop – that it was being rented out in, quite obviously for sexual purposes.

David Futrelle believes that pictures of fully clothed teens can be considered ‘child porn’ in a certain context (for example, a ‘jailbait’ forum). Yet he thinks a film depicting naked children being tortured can be rented out in a gay sex shop alongside other pornographic movies.

But what is really the most offensive about this, is the sheer hypocrisy involved. David Futrelle has continuously libelled Warren Farrell as being a paedophile, as well as incited violence against him, for disputed comments he made on incest nearly 50 years ago – comments which, even if they were made by Farrell, were not particularly unusual or heretic for the time, especially within sex positive feminist circles. In fact, as we know, Futrelle made some far more shocking statements regarding child sex, and abuse in general, much more recently, of which his defence of Salo is only one example.

David Futrelle goes beyond calling Warren Farrell an ‘incest apologist’ for comments he may or may not have made nearly half-a-century ago. He explicitly accuses him of being a paedophile on the basis of those comments. Underneath every article he has published on Farrell and his incest comments, he tags the article with ‘paedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles‘. He does this every time he quotes an anti-feminist who criticises feminist laws on the inflated concept of ‘paedophilia’. Most recently (last week) he libelled Richard Dawkins as a paedophile for simply acknowledging that experiencing mild fumbling as a young teen is not the same as, for example, a 5 year old boy being raped by his father.

farrell-1
farrell-2

dawkins-1
dawkins-2

Futrelle appears to live in a fantasy world in which he can routinely libel others, yet screams and shouts when others point out that if x is a paedophile for discussing y, then it follows as a matter of logic that Futrelle is also a paedophile for discussing y.

Given the nature of the fantasies that Futrelle appears willing to defend, his detachment from reality could be considered somewhat disturbing… to say the least.

Please consider tweeting a link to this article to Richard Dawkins.


MonsterBoobz – David Futrelle and his Disturbing Defence of a Film that Consists Almost Entirely of Graphic Scenes Depicting the Sexual Abuse and Torture of Naked Children

**NOTE TO VISITORS – Don’t be fooled by Futrelle’s ridiculous dismissal of this scandal as him simply having ‘once written a news story on a censorship controversy’.

David Futrelle mocked American police officers for thinking it inappropriate for a video containing graphic images depicting naked child actors as young as 14 being anally raped, forced to eat their abuser’s shit, tortured, and slowly murdered, to be rented out alongside other porn films in a seedy gay sex shop. He still continues to refuse to apologize for or even acknowledge this.

TRIGGER WARNINGS

David Futrelle
David Futrelle – Naked 14 y.o. boys eating shit can be classic art…and rented out in gay sex shops..

David Futrelle once described an adult male’s fantasy of violently sexually assualting a random boy in a bar as ‘tender’ and ‘erotic’. Writing about this, I posed the question – if this was Futrelle’s idea of a ‘tender’ homoerotic yearning, what would his definition of a more hardcore sexual fantasy involving teenage boys possibly consist of?

Sexually humiliating them? Forcing them to eat human faeces? Mutilating them? Torturing them before murdering them?

No. Futrelle apparently accepts that these evil depravities should not be the subjects of sexual fantasy. We can all breathe a sigh of relief. Especially our teenage sons.

For according to Futrelle, such things are the theme of ‘classic’ art, not sexploitation.

Even when sold in seedy gay bookstores. Even when one of the boy actors later killed himself. Even when the paedophile director of the movie was murdered soon after the film was completed by a child he was abusing in real life. Even when the film is officially banned in at least 15 different countries and is routinely described as the most appalling and grotesque ever made.

David Futrelle was an active freelance writer back in the 90’s, writing for both online and offline liberal publications that included Salon, and ‘In These Times’. Quote-mining from the many articles he wrote in this period, we find that he claimed that an age of consent above 12 is apparently nothing more than prudish feminists ‘controlling the sexuality of young girls’, described the sexual fantasy of violently assaulting a random boy in a bar as ‘tender’ and ‘erotic’, suggested that child rape victims be encouraged to marry their abusers (who would be spared jail), repeatedly accused the world’s leading child protection organizations (such as the NSPCC) of generating hysteria and lies over child abuse, and railed against the first government efforts to protect children from online paedophilia and porn.

Describing some of these shocking and outrageous viewpoints of David Futrelle, I wondered what more dark secrets and even more disturbing quotes were still to be found in the dusty internet archives, amongst the hundreds of pieces he wrote for his liberal ‘sex positive’ feminist audience back in the 1990’s. I specifically mentioned that the thought of what still might be discovered sent a shiver up my spine…and likely his too.

I wasn’t wrong.

David Futrelle and his Defence of ‘Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom’

How would you describe a ‘man’ who not only cried ‘censorship’ against the authorities for clamping down on a sexploitation film that contained graphic scenes of children being raped, tortured, forced to eat excrement, mutilated, and then murdered, but joked that the store should only be punished for renting out the film to the police who were too stupid to appreciate it?

http://www.unz.org/Pub/InTheseTimes-1994aug22-00010a02?View=PDF

Most normal, sane, moral people would call such a film beyond evil. One of the traumatized male child actors, who would have been only 15 or 16 when the sickening movie was filmed, in which he is made to eat the shit of his abuser before having his nipples burned off, later killed himself through a drug overdose at the age of just 33. Today, such a film would undoubtedly be classed as category 5 child pornography (the very worst). Writing about the movie back in the 1990’s, David Futrelle judged it only as being ‘not exactly family entertainment’.

In fact, astonishingly, he also joked that instead of arresting the men distributing a film in a gay sex shop that graphicly portays naked (real) underage boys being sexually abused, that they should only be fined for ‘renting films that go over the head of the average undercover cop’.

Futrelle’s defence of the film seems to rest entirely on the status of the director – Pier Paolo Pasolini – as an ‘artistic genius’. Pasolini, a pederast, turned to film-making after his career as a schoolteacher was curtailed due to accusations that he was molesting the children. He is known for handpicking his invariably young and often pubescent actors and embarking upon sexual affairs with them – one such actor was only 15 when Pasolini cast him. Shortly before the release of ‘120 Days of Sodom’, the director was brutally murdered. An underage boy prostitute confessed to the murder, claiming that Pasolini had attempted to anally rape him. However, the child recanted the confession decades later, and the case was re-opened. Some suspect that Pasolini may have been killed by an outraged family member of the young cast, who were all aged between 14-18.

This grotesque sexploitation movie is officially banned in 15 different countries, although, as stated above, it should undoubtedly be automatically classed as the worst form of child pornography. Its defenders claim that it makes an artistic statement about the ‘corruption of power over innocence and youth’. The abusers in the film are portrayed as Italian wartime fascists who kidnap eight teenage boys and girls and subject them to 120 days of grotesque sexual torture and humiliation before murdering them. I have not watched the movie, and never will, but according to most online reviews and descriptions, it consists almost entirely of the graphic depiction of these tortures, with the teenage cast of victims, aged as young as 14, none of whom were actors (they were handpicked by the director from a modelling agency for their good looks and almost pre-pubescent appearance) looking genuinely terrified.

Despite the film’s supposed artistic statement about fascism and the corruption of power, and hence justification as an ‘art movie’, rather than porn or sexploitation, it is unclear why the director was homosexual, the audience of the film appears to be mainly homosexual, most of the positive online reviewers of the movie appear to be homosexual, why most of the movie’s focus is aparently on the graphic sexual torture of naked underage boys, and why the movie was being rented out in a Cincinnati ‘gay and lesbian bookstore’ that deals mainly with erotic homosexual products.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sal%C3%B2,_or_the_120_Days_of_Sodom

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0268668/?ref_=tt_cl_t9

Just a handful of dozens of scathing Amazon customer’s review (yes, unbelievably this is still being sold openly on Amazon) :

Its disgusting. Watching people go through this, it seemed real to me, like watching a documentary of children being tortured. I think people who get off watching sickening abuse call this art as an excuse to watch it, when really they just get off watching torture porn. there is something wrong with this world. children being tortured and raped is not art. there is no reason for this movie to exist it should be illegal. sickening, horrifying, will haunt you for the rest of your life.

Unless watching a group of naked children cry for two hours is your idea of a good time, I say pass this one up.

I have read the reviews of what a deep movie this is and the important social message. What I saw was a badly acted porno with some near vomit-inducing moments. It’s as if the director was looking for an excuse to portray acts of pedophilia and extreme cruelty and then calling it art to justify it. How anyone can sit through this more than once and get some kind of enjoyment from it is beyond me.

David Futrelle still tries to incite violence against a frail old man for a misquoted comment made nearly half-a-century ago.

I found watching a roomful of innocent youths forced to eat their own feces in graphic detail nauseating, unsettling, and strangely banal. Populating a film with images of extreme violence does not substitute for commentary or condemnation. Leering at these victims is tantamount to one being complicent in their fates. There is nothing educational, liberating, life-affirming, or redeeming about Salo. If this is your thing, skip out on the nonexistent artistic pretense and take a trip to your neighborhood adult movie store.

(If David Futrelle had his way, perverts would be able to rent this at adult movie stores, or at least gay and lesbian adult movie stores).

David Cronenberg’s film Videodrome was right: pretty soon people will be wanting to watch movies of pure torture, with no redeeming values what so ever. Im sure I’ll get o out of 137 people finding this review helpful, and that sickens me. In my opinion, movies like this are bad for your mind. The whole movie is a bunch of innocent teenagers being torured, raped, molested, disembowled, and wirse things of which I won’t even describe. I can’t believe people enjoy this movie. Im not trying to insult anyone, im just trying to get people to realize that they are enjoying a movie about kids being tortured and sodomized. Im not some fanatical christian, or over protective parent, Im just a college kid whose worried about what movies like this do to people’s minds

Only the cruelest and most sadistic moron could enjoy this movie. It is repugnant and rejects every decency of which man is capable.

The imagery of the two men french-kissing with excrement on their mouths has been difficult to erase, not to mention the child rapes, the scenes of mutilation, and total absence of responsibility for the creation of such an otherwise gross and boring film.

This film is sick. Very sick. I am not a prude. I am a grown up gay man with rather radical views.
Still this film made me throw up when I saw it while preparing to write an essay on the director for a gay, cultural magazine.
I am aware of Pasolinis intentions of describing the real inner life and dephts of fascism, and I hate anything that even comes near to fascist views, even ordinary right wing views.

And still: This is the most evil film I have ever seen.
To think up this film, even with the literary source of it as a background, Pasolini had to use his own imagination. And I am glad I never knew a person with such an imagination (at least I hope I don’t know any such person).
And worst of all: The young kids in the movie had to go through these scenes, to act out this sick story. To do those things! I do really hope they have been taken good care of ever since!

(The above Amazon reviewer appears unaware that one of the child actors killed himself aged just 33).

Only serial killers and child molesters will get any enjoyment out of seeing this more than once.

David Futrelle O Face
disgraced blogger and child scat gay torture porn apologist David Futrelle

This film is not as graphic as one may make it seem. It’s the overall feeling you get once the movie’s over that makes you want to crawl into a hole. Watch Cannibal Holocaust if you want something gut-wrenching. Watch Salo if you enjoy watching 15-year-old boys getting sodomized for 2 hours.

What can possibly be artistic about a film which shows a table full of adults and children eating human feces, vivid scalpings, genital burnings, continuous sodomy, organ mutilations, and teen children being lead around naked on leashes and forced to bark and eat scraps of food from a dog dish ??? THIS is supposed to be art ??? Salo is nothing but pure evil. No other film is as brutally, vividly disturbing as this one. But that does NOT make it a work of art.

I’ve never advocated censorship at all, but Salo changes my mind – particularly since it involves cruelty to minors. If the director Pasolini, as some rumors suggest, was murdered as a reaction to making this film, it is not hard to believe. This is celluloid at its worst. Every copy on the market should be deleted and destroyed.

People who have seen the film tell me that Pasolini made the film to show the true ways of our human nature and how bad people can be.What a bunch of crock!This is the most violating and sickest film I have seen.Hey,I like watching graphic films but I have my limits and this film goes way over that limit.”Salo,or the 120 Days of Sodom” is worthless,pointless,violating and the most trashiest,sleaziest sickest film ever made.Who cares if Pasolini was an artist.I have no respect for this film or Pasolini.How can I after what I have seen.

All biases aside, this film is nothing more than 117 minutes of continuous torture and sexual perversion directed at young people. Any socially responsible director can get his point across without feeling the need to wallow in this filth with child actors being violated in nearly every way possible . I have no doubt that Passolini either was getting his jollies out of the action being performed in front of his camera or was suffering great mental illness in order to allow his cast to be degraded in this way. It really is no wonder he was murdered shortly after completion of this film….As another reviewer has previously said this is an evil film and leaves an incredibly bad taste in ones mouth particularly when one realises they have partaken in this viewing experience willingly and contributed to the films revenue.

Do not listen to the positive reviews on this page unless you like to see the sexual torture of innocent children.

Even if this work had artistic merit, which IS VERY DEBATABLE. The detrimental effect on society through desensitization and moral corruption would more than neutralize any gain in expression. Based on a debit to credit argument, this film is a LOSER.

I tell you the point, the film may have begun as an analogy of fascism, but it deteriorated into a display of the director’s perverted fantasies. That is why it is so pointlessly excessive. A director using the theme of fascism as an opportunity to produce a perverse sadistic film. Another example of art used as a pretence, to really disguise a darker intend and desire.

Now the people who watch this film over and over, well all I got to say is this, be careful of them…. very careful

And I would add to that be very careful…and I mean very careful..of a man who attacked the police for removing this film from a gay sex shop, and yet who tries to make a career (and get laid) out of criminalizing the very idea that men and boys have rights.

See also : Did David Futrelle Defend Child Prositution and an Age of Consent of 12?

David Futrelle – The ‘innocence’ of children and women victims of abuse is ‘exaggerated’

Soraya Chemaly, Al Jazeera, and the SLPC face tough questions over association with David Futrelle, child abuse apologist


David Fraudtrelle Makes the Cover of Time Magazine

Well, it looks like Fraudtrelle has finally made it on to the cover of Time magazine….Hard Time magazine that is – LOL!.
david-futrelle-time