<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anti-Feminist Theory of Feminism, Male Sexuality, Men&#039;s Rights &#187; barnardos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theantifeminist.com/tag/barnardos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theantifeminist.com</link>
	<description>Resisting the Rape of the Male - Feminism as a sexual trade union</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:19:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Feminists support child abuse</title>
		<link>http://theantifeminist.com/feminists-support-child-abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://theantifeminist.com/feminists-support-child-abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theantifeminist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barnardos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitch fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abuse industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism and child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism is a sexual trade union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nspcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen bullying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theantifeminist.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A comment I received from a feminist on yesterday&#8217;s post, concerning the silence of feminist sexual pressure groups child protection charities over American &#8216;bitch fight&#8217; websites. These are sites  that openly make money from videos of young high school girls being bullied, maimed, &#8230; <a href="http://theantifeminist.com/feminists-support-child-abuse/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A comment I received from a feminist on yesterday&#8217;s post, concerning the silence of <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">feminist sexual pressure groups</span> child protection charities over American &#8216;bitch fight&#8217; websites. These are sites  that openly make money from videos of young high school girls being bullied, maimed, and beaten, even it appears sometimes into comas. </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><a title="girl gets beaten into coma" href="http://www.mentalzero.com/Girl-Gets-Knocked-Out-from-an-Extremely-Brutal-Attack-772.html" target="_blank">Girl Get&#8217;s Beaten into Coma (NSFW &#8211; but safe for feminists)</a></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>What on earth is wrong with two girls fighting? Will their wombs drop? Do you think that only boys should fight? You don’t have any real arguments! Absolutely ridiculous. Besides, you can moderate any comments out- so you may have had hundreds of rational, well argued, legitimate comments, but you won’t have published any of them.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not devoting an entire post to this feminist&#8217;s comments because they contain any semblance of logic or reason.  Rather, it is because they sickeningly highlight how little feminists care about the indisputably real and graphic abuse of children when it doesn&#8217;t limit their own adult sexual interests in a free sexual market.</p>
<p>A young girl, obviously being bullied, being beaten into what appears to be a coma whilst her schoolmates gather round cheering and recording it on their mobile phones, is a clear and transparent case of abuse. At least to normal, healthy, non-feminists. The fact that those children then upload the video to an American website that openly makes money from its millions of morality lite viewers clicking on advertisements from American companies (often including Google Adsense) is indescribably sick.  The fact that child protection societies such as Barnardos, the NSPCC, and ECAP do NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING, to stop it, speaks volumes for what they are.  Middle-aged feminist sexual pressure groups that do not care in the least about stopping real child abuse, but which are only interested in 1/ limiting competition to themselves from teenage girls in a free sexual market 2/ making themselves lots of money and 3/ weakening the family unit and demonizing men.</p>
<p>One thing I do want to make clear though is that I&#8217;m in no way suggesting that videos of young girls being beaten half to death for video entertainment are in any way worse than those featuring boys.  In fact, if anything good comes out of these videos it is in revealing how infinitely much more evil and vicious girls are than boys and how the greatest threat to the welfare of young girls is not boys, nor even &#8217;online predators&#8217;, but other teenage girls.</p>
<p>In fact, on these morally depraved sites, boy fights are much rarer, and most often much less violent.  Boys seem to know when to stop.  Boys don&#8217;t seem to actually want to kill each other over who said what about who on MySpace.  Boys don&#8217;t seem to gang up and bully and beat into comas smaller, weaker boys.  However, the very worst are just as indescribably evil :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mentalzero.com/Bathroom-Beatdown-Leaves-Nerdy-Kid-Bleeding-1049.html">http://www.mentalzero.com/Bathroom-Beatdown-Leaves-Nerdy-Kid-Bleeding-1049.html</a></p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t wish to ignore the fact that most of the viewers of these sites are probably male.  Men are programmed to enjoy watching violence, just as those who aren&#8217;t homosexual, or attracted to small children, naturally enjoy looking at fertile teenage girls.  The relevant question is why do female dominated child protection charities focus only on criminilizing men world-wide for merely looking at a picture of a sexy 17 year old girl in a thong, and yet completely ignore websites that make money from showing graphic physical abuse of children (in which the corrolation between &#8216;the demand feeds the supply&#8217; is far more obvious)? </p>
<p>If I have to spell out the answer one more time, I may as well give up.</p>
<p>Here is a suggestion to the Men&#8217;s rights community.  Let&#8217;s make a concerted  campaign of stopping these schoolchild fight video sites.  Let&#8217;s show that we, unlike feminists and their fake child protection charities, actually care about putting an end to the indisputable and obvious abuse and exploitation of children.  If they are unwilling to stop the genuine abuse of girls, then we sure as hell will stop the abuse and exploitation of boys.</p>
<p>Hey, wait a moment.  I forgot myself there.  95% of MRAs are too busy trying to prove that as many women break feminist sex laws as do men. And to criminilize pre-marital sex.  And to tell boys (and girls &#8211; we believe in equality) that they&#8217;ll go to hell for masturbating.</p>
<p> Forget it.  Let&#8217;s crack open the beer and watch two teenage Russian girls go at it &#8211; go at it in the sense of beating the other into a coma&#8230; obviously. This is the American way. This is the British way.  This is the feminist way. This is the Men&#8217;s Rights way.</p>
<p><strong><a title="insane brutal kicks to the face of girl" href="http://www.mentalzero.com/Insane-Brutal-Kicks-to-the-Face-Leave-a-Girl-Helpless-796.html" target="_blank">Insane brutal kicks to the face leave a girl helpless</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theantifeminist.com/feminists-support-child-abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

