33 thoughts on “Spiked Online on Savile and Abuse Hysteria

  1. Eric

    Hume: "In this light, the celebrity abuse trawling looks less like the normal pursuit of criminals and more like a national therapuetic exercise. In recent years, the notion that experiences of childhood...must shape an adult's entire life. Now we seem to be witnessing a society-wide version of this therapuetic determinism."

    Just like demon-possession all over again.

  2. Alan Vaughn

    And since my gut feeling, based upon past experience tells me the Daily Femiserve Mail won't publish it, here's my comment:

    Winifred Grant, quite rightly said:
    "Jimmy Savile might have been a lot of things, but he wasn't orange and made from felt".

    True, but he might as well be, as he is after all: DECEASED.
    Why can't all these paedohysterical loonies just let him R.I.P?
    This witch-hunt of a DEAD MAN makes events like the Salem Witch-hunt or even the 16th century Inquisitions look insignificant.

    We're supposedly an advanced and informed society? They're now resurrecting the old Satanic Ritual Abuse FAIRY-TALE and you lot BELIEVE it... That unfounded and superstitious RUBBISH!

  3. Deano

    The next allegation against Savile might be that he lied about his age in order to meet teenagers. Such activity might soon get you 8 years of daily beatings and amateur genital surgery down under:-

    http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/carlys-law-named-after-murdered-teen-carly-ryan-will-catch-online-liars/story-fnat79vb-1226557755849

    Now, the guy was a murderer and I'm not defending him in any way but note that he only had to lower his real age (52) to 20 in order to be of interest to 14 year old Carly. I guess if a real 20 year old lied about his age and claimed he was 14, she wouldn't have been interested!

    Also note the claim that:-
    "We're not talking about stopping the 40-year-old who lies about his age because he's embarrassed about playing World of Warcraft.

    "We're talking about predators who create false identities to target vulnerable children."

    How comforting! If a 40 year old lies about his age to avoid embarrassment while playing computer games with people much younger, then we all know how easy it is for our heavily biased courts to claim you were only there to meet children. I mean, they prosecute fathers for producing child porn after taking pics of their own kids at sports carnivals.

  4. Eric

    Alan:
    "A report by the NPSCC says that Savile spent every waking minute thinking about abusing children."

    How did this guy ever find time to work? Between arranging meet-ups and practicing satanic rituals, he must have kept a very tight schedule...all this done with greater secrecy than the British military's efforts in WW2!

    According to one Savile article, Sir Jimmy molested more than 450 women during a 54-year crime spree. The math alone works this out to an average of once every six weeks or so! Unfortunately, trying to convince the paedohysterical white knights with reason is worse than useless...

  5. Eric

    Deano:
    Well, we've all seen the videos of the evil Savile groping a girl on stage at 'Top of the Pops'. Looking through my music videos, here he is again---this time promoting his satanic friends right on Top of the Pops!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOErZuzZpS8&feature

    And note that the lyrics specifically reference 'little girls'! Has anybody investigated Arthur Brown or HIS connection to the scandal????

    Horrors---how deep does it go?

  6. Alan Vaughn

    @Deano

    How comforting! If a 40 year old lies about his age to avoid embarrassment while playing computer games with people much younger, then we all know how easy it is for our heavily biased courts to claim you were only there to meet children. I mean, they prosecute fathers for producing child porn after taking pics of their own kids at sports carnivals.

    What tends to occur when they make these 'one-fits-all' laws, is that they conflate all crimes from the least serious with the most heinous to be the same.
    I.e. they conflate the thought crime of a sexually normal man looking at images of 16 year old 'children' in the privacy of his own home, with an abhorrent and heinous crime committed by a REAL vile predator who murdered a 7 year old after raping her!
    It is this ridiculous redefining and conflation of ALL sex laws that makes the paedohysterical, scapegoating and witch-hunting public (especially in America), think that sexually normal men who like to look at images of 16 or 17 year old (adult) girls (and ONLY look at pictures - no more), are vile paedophiles and predators; while at the same time, trivialize the REALLY DANGEROUS, murdering predators with them.

    So in effect, they are increasing the risk to children. (Assuming that there really are as many dangerous and monstrous predators out there as the abuse industry wants us to believe there are).

    By stating: “We’re not talking about stopping the 40-year-old who lies about his age because he’s embarrassed about playing World of Warcraft." is nonsense! They have actually acknowledged or admitted, by that very statement, that they will assume the hypothetical '40 year old man' will be using the Warcraft online environment as an excuse to gain 'legitimate' access to children.
    This of course will make children even more wary (FEARFUL) of adults (adult MEN) than they already (unnecessarily) are!

    Read this excellent summary about this 'special' kind of (specifically made for 'perverts') 'injustice' by Brian Rothery in Chapter 3 of his Inquistion 21 story, under the subtitle: Disgusted decency.

    You might also find his latest post on Jimmy Savile a good read...

  7. A music loving friend of mine stated that they would have to arrest every single rock star of the 1970ies.

    They all were flooded with groupies 16, 15, 14, 13 years old.

    I refrain from naming any, to avoid helping the witch hunters.

    Isn't spiked-online a main stream publication? Good that even these wake up to the hysteria.

    But to all of us, they don't go far enough.

    I don't see any serious problem in the behavior in the 1970ies. And most of the world has not seen a serious problem until recently.

    And whoever sees a problem, have him keep a closer watch on his daughter.

  8. Alan Vaughn

    @Eric

    According to one Savile article, Sir Jimmy molested more than 450 women during a 54-year crime spree. The math alone works this out to an average of once every six weeks or so! Unfortunately, trying to convince the paedohysterical white knights with reason is worse than useless…

    Yeah, the one article being the OFFICIAL joint Police / NSPCC report. (The same one that among others: Steve Moxon exposed as the total travesty of justice and of normal decency it is)!
    You're right though and anyone possessing any semblance of common sense would draw exactly the same conclusion, but that's just it: paedohysteria (and of course its partner - paedocrisy), absolutely FORBIDS any kind of normal thought process let alone 'common sense' to enter any kind of discourse on 'child-abuse' (or anything even remotely related).

    I would expect therefore, that the same lynch-mob (and includes the police and the NSPCC), would also argue that Santa Clause is real and he really can and DOES deliver Christmas presents to every house in the world (via the chimney, including houses that don't have chimneys), all on the one night, between dusk on Dec 24 and dawn of Dec 25.

    Perhaps we should ask them why he hasn't been burnt at the stake yet, as he clearly MUST BE a certified dirty old paedo-pervert??
    (Because, according to their dominant narrative: ALL old men who are kind to children are paedophiles and their perverted sexual interest in children is the ONLY reason they could possibly have for being so kind to them)..
    And they'll probably quite seriously tell us how they've been trying to, but he moves faster than the speed of light, thus it's impossible to catch the filthy predator - LOL!!
    (I'd better put that 'LOL' in there, just in case some of the international lynch-mob or even one of the regular paedocrite visitors from the mRM happens to be reading this and thinks I'm serious)... ;)

  9. Deano

    Eric - Savile used to disguise himself as Aurthur Brown in order to molest even more children. Your clip is photographic proof of him doing it!

    Alan - two great links mate. Thanks. 'Disgusted Decency' nails it perfectly. It's a shame that articles with such insight are never published in the main stream media, but then again, the MSM have already claimed the Emperor's new clothes look magnificent and they can't back out now.

  10. inclinedreader

    How comforting! If a 40 year old lies about his age to avoid embarrassment while playing computer games with people much younger

    yeah, again with this stupid age divide. So what if a 40-year-old still enjoys online computer games? This generation of 40-year-olds isn't like our granddads'... where people grew up with valve radios and black and white televisions that only had three TV stations. Today's 40-year-olds grew up when computer games for the first time became widely available on Commodore C64s and Ataris. Why should they not continue to do what some of them have enjoyed doing since their early youth? Times have simply moved on, everything IS interactive these days.

    All this pedohysteria has led to an unhealthy wedge that is driven between the generations. This day and age, anybody above a certain age who still just simply has a knack for being fun to be around for younger people is looked at like he's a weirdo and a pervert.

  11. Alan Vaughn

    @Human-Stupidity

    I don’t see any serious problem in the behavior in the 1970ies. And most of the world has not seen a serious problem until recently.

    That would be mainly, for two simple reasons:
    a) Much of 'most of the world' either weren't born
    until the mid or late 1970's or later or,
    b) those that are old enough and lived in the 70's have
    since been 're-programmed' with feminist mantras, dogma and
    FALSE ideologies that demonize normal male
    sexuality, thus are now paedohysterical or of
    course, (if they are white-knight manginas - 'men'): are
    now very nervous, card-carrying paedocrites.

  12. Eric

    Alan:
    Thanks for Inquisition 21 link. That Starmer guy looks like he belongs in an SS uniform. Britain is really headed for some rough times...

  13. Eric

    Alan:
    Besides the improbable mathematics involved, none of these dunces like Vigilant Citizen ever stop to ask themselves the obvious question: If all these 'elites' are part of a Satanic brotherhood that controls everything, especially the media, how does the public ever find out about them? And especially since the only people 'in the know' have absolutely no access to these 'higher circles of power.'

    If the BBC and the British government could keep Savile's activities quiet for 54 years, it should be even easier to keep them quiet after he was dead. But again---we're talking logic here; and the rest of the mRAs are too busy drooling over the Lovely Sheilas and plotting their revenge against normal males of whom the Sheilas disapprove.

  14. Eric

    Deano:
    Arthur might be able to use that as a defense when the witch-hunt starts heading his way. He claim since he always wore a mask, nobody could prove it was really him.

    On the other hand though, the paedohysterics would ask what he had to hide if he was wearing a mask in the first place; and someone with good musical knowledge might remember that Arthur once set himself on fire on stage. The fact that he didn't burn to death is proof that he's a witch: hence he'll have to be tortured under the personal supervision of Kommissar Starmer until he confesses everything.

  15. jack

    Meanwhile another TV personality is being indicted for rape dating back to 1976 (!!!):

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-21154999

    The only silver lining is that it's BBC personalities who seem to be targeted, considering that the BBC is so devious and subtle in its bias against men, as explained by Angry Harry. It may be part of a final purge by the BBC's femistalinian establishment.

  16. Alan Vaughn

    @Deano

    Alan – two great links mate. Thanks. ‘Disgusted Decency’ nails it perfectly. It’s a shame that articles with such insight are never published in the main stream media, but then again, the MSM have already claimed the Emperor’s new clothes look magnificent and they can’t back out now.

    I'm glad you appreciate his work - I think he has the whole sordid business summed up very well, by referring to what's happening today as 'Inquistion 21'.
    I hope you read a little further on in the same chapter (3) of the Inquistion 21st Century story, especially under the subtitle: Questions we love, questions we avoid, and people we love to hate, as it sums up the current paedohysteria fantastically, but even better describes the mentality of the current IGNORANT lynch-mob, which effectively makes up the society, that regrettably, you and I and all our good MRA friends here, have to admit we are part of...

  17. Eric

    Alan:
    LOL, our pal VC is at again today: he's found the Express article and trumpeting Savile's alleged satanism. I left a comment there that actually got through---it's going to go down in a flurry of downvotes any minute now. LOL

  18. Eric

    Jack:
    "It might be part of a final purge of the BBC's femistalinist establishment."

    I totally agree. The US military is following suit; after the fall of General Petraeus, President Michele Obama announced today that all restrictions against females serving in combat forces would be lifted: meaning now the US military is hopelessly under the femihag thumb.

  19. theantifeminist

    Post author

    I,m running out of mobile credit and can't top up abroad so don't be surprised if comments go a couple of days unapproved. Back by weekend.

  20. jack

    @Eric, in fact I think the lifting of restricting against women in combat duty has been seen as a step towards what some MRAs (like Barbarossaa) have been demanding, ie registration of women for selective service in the US and formation of women-only combat units. The latter is because apparently when you have women and men in the same units, the men go out of their way to keep the women from harm's way (instead of concentrating on the fight at hand).

  21. Alan Vaughn

    @Eric

    Alan:
    LOL, our pal VC is at again today: he’s found the Express article and trumpeting Savile’s alleged satanism. I left a comment there that actually got through—it’s going to go down in a flurry of downvotes any minute now. LOL

    I went there, read your comment and backed you up with a fairly 'thought-provoking' reply (which is still waiting for approval), but I replied to 3 other lunatic paedocrites commentators there, with short replies, all of which were instantly allowed and are still there for you to see...

  22. Eric

    Alan:
    LOL I saw your three comments. I think that too high a dose of sanity is more than they can handle!

    I put two more up today. How long do you suppose it will be before they want us burned at the stake? LOL

  23. Eric

    Jack:
    I know that some MRAs have called for female participation in the military, but I think that's carrying equality too far. If it were up to me, I wouldn't allow women in the military, or police and fire departments and several other occupations. There are some places they simply don't belong.

  24. Alan Vaughn

    @Eric,
    I just posted a few more replies over there at VC...
    Such as this one, in response to a classic paedocrite calling itself 'GTFO' who said 'where there's smoke there's fire' I said:

    GTFO, Indeed why don't you. You're a paedophile! (Acting like you HATE them to hide your own paedophilia - an old trick that most people can see straight through (smoke where there's fire)).
    Where there's lots of money to be made in 'victims compensation' (the 'smoke') there's usually many FALSE allegations - especially when under the current FEMINIST law: EVIDENCE or reliable witness testimony is NOT REQUIRED to substantiate such dreadful accusations (the 'fire).

    It was published OK. I think the chief paedo there - Vigilant Citizen himself only moderates comments, not replies to existing comments.
    The 'thought provoking' comment I made a couple of days ago wasn't published, so the trick is if you want to be a proverbial 'cat among the paedos pigeons': REPLY to a (an existing) comment, don't make a new comment...
    LOL!!

  25. Alan Vaughn

    @Eric
    PS: The new replies I posted, were under a new pseudonym: 'Vaughn' (because I wasn't sure if they'd be allowed using the same one I used last time). The ones I made 2 or 3 days ago were made by 'Alan'...

  26. Eric

    Alan:
    They're definately stirred up now---154 comments last time I checked (and added 4 new ones). An MRA commenter named 'George' has also added some worthwhile remarks!

  27. Eric

    Alan:
    PS: One commenter complained at your post: "I googled the term paedohysteria---it's not a real word, it only turns up at a blog called 'Antifeminist' and a few other bullshit sites." LOL

  28. theantifeminist

    Post author

    PS: One commenter complained at your post: “I googled the term paedohysteria—it’s not a real word, it only turns up at a blog called ‘Antifeminist’ and a few other bullshit sites.” LOL

    I don't want to spoil my fun in the sun by reading that piece of shit article till I get back, but I hope you guys are using the word 'paedocrite' liberally in the comments section there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>