27-year-old Huerta — who was once featured on the cover of Sports Illustrated — was in front of a bar in Austin around 2 AM on Saturday morning … when some other people began fighting. Roger was near the scuffle … when he saw one of the men involved punch a female who was standing near the ruckus.
Once Huerta sees the woman collapse to the ground — he instantly tries to confront the attacker saying, “You just punched a f**kin’ girl.”
Moments later, Huerta takes off his shirt … slams his hat to the ground … and rushes after the man.
Chaos ensues and people scramble after the fighters, blocking the camera — but seconds later … a shirtless Huerta can be seen finishing his attack on the other man … who is sprawled out on the street.
People rush in to aid the bloody man on the ground — who eventually gets off the pavement — as Huerta walks away from the battle ground.
Austin PD tells TMZ that officers were called to the scene — but so far, no arrests have been made.
Huerta’s manager tells us, “I have not spoken to Roger yet about this incident, but I can say that it’s in his nature to be very protective of women.”
Sucker punching somebody weaker than yourself is obviously the height of cowardice. But in this age of ‘equality’, does hitting a woman per sejustify getting a beat down from a professional fighter? An assault so vicious, that it might leave you eating through straws for the rest of your life? Well, yes seems to be the general consensus to those commenting on (ex) Lightweight UFC fighter Roger Huerta’s white knight KO’ing of a big black dude who ‘laid his hands on a woman’.
On first viewing of the video, it does appear that the black guy is guilty of sucker punching a random white lady. On second viewing, it would seem more likely that the white woman has done something personally to anger the black guy in the bar, perhaps even hit him (you can’t really tell because the video begins with a fight spilling out into the street and the apparent ‘sucker punch’).
But wherever you read this story, nearly 100% of the comments are fully supportive of Roger Huerta. Don’t hit a woman. Period. Nobody knows the background to the incident, but virtually every man who has watched the video would cheer if they learnt that the black guy’s life support machine had been switched off.
Dana White himself, president of the UFC, had this to say about the incident :
“In no way do I condone street fighting, but when a guy puts his hands on a woman he deserves to be knocked the [expletive] out. Good for Roger.”
I wonder if that quote will be remembered should the UFC ever follow the lead of other MMA promotions, and allow woman cage fighters to choke and pound each other in order to line promoter’s pockets?
1. Posted by The Great One Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:47 pm EDT
Good for Roger, i would have done the same damn thing. I am a fighter myself, but you NEVER put your hands on a woman under ANY circumstance. Good job Roger!2. Posted by Horacio Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:48 pm EDT
My worst nightmare would be to pick a fight with a dude i didnt know was in the UFC.
29. Posted by Angelcruise Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:42 pm EDTWhat if the Woman started the Fight, w/ her loose & stupid mouth… how many times has that happened…Equality?!!
But what’s most disturbing is the fact that although there is no dispute that Roger Huerta knocked the guy out, it appears that TMZ.com, who released the video, edited it to make it look as though he was also the man curbstomping him at the end of the video. In fact, upon closer inspection it seems that this was not Huerta. Yet when interviewed by TMZ the ex-UFC fighter was happy to go along with the story, and did not make any attempt to deny that it was he who was stomping on the man’s head as he lay on the ground.
I wonder who Roger should come to the aid of in this video?
Good catch.
Another brainless animal who doesn’t realize he’s a second class citizen. As for this Dana White guy he’s a disgrace to his sex.
Whatever started the fight, it was a fight between men.
Though women should be careful that their behavior might incite someone’s violent reaction, so should men. You can’t kick everybody’s ass in the world. On the street, it’s prudent to bear this in mind.
I wasn’t there, so I can’t say whether Huerta was crazy or not, but for sure, a guy who thinks he can behave however he wants in public is stupid. If someone gets darwinist out in public, they should be ready for survival of the fittest. Guys who understand they aren’t the biggest fish pack heat.
The fact that he not only allowed this guy to be beaten while he was down, but actually took the “credit” for doing it himself proves to me that this UFC half-wit is not himself a man. I was taught that no matter what happens to cause a fight, when your opponent goes down the fight is over. To beat a defenseless creature, be it a guy or a dog, shows that you have no honor. Just one more trait of a man that is being steadily eroded by the “feminist” agenda.
Punching a woman is wrong in MOST cases because in MOST cases the woman can’t really defend herself (there are exceptions though such as female martial artists or female bodybuilders or if you are dealing with a normal woman who is attacking you with a weapon such as a knife). That being said if we are supposed to be living in an age of equality why can’t we just replace “never hit a woman” with “never hit someone who can’t defend themselves such as…” this would still give adequate protection to women and also EXTEND that protection to certain types of men who cannot defend themselves. IMHO what the guy did in this incident (curb kicking a man who was down and out) was just as disgusting as the guy punching the woman.
I had no idea that “chivalry” now meant kicking somebody when they’re down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxqI0R9CtS4
the huerta is cropped in the beginning so that we don’t see what the woman did to the black man. no camera shoots with that aspect ratio, and later in the video the aspect ratio widens. so we can assume that she hit him or threw a drink on him, etc.
white knight syndrome is so bad in western culture, that fully 99% of men you encounter will beat you down if you so much as defend yourself from an attacking woman (see the US Open brawl video).
this social programming is like the matrix – everyone in the matrix is a potential agent. 99% of men are potential agents of a feminized society. you’ll see in many white knight videos online, it’s like a switch suddenly flips and these WKs attack the man without thinking. it’s an immediate reaction. it’s frightening.
it’s so bad that i won’t go to clubs or bars with women i know who are loud or flirtatious or get drunk. when some dude starts to hit on them, they look to me to save them. F that!
i had a full pint of beer thrown in my face at a club by a woman i never saw before – then she went to the bouncer and had ME kicked out of the club. i’m done!
ghosting it from here out.
This sentimant of “never hit a woman. Period” just shows what a lot of brainwashed morons are out there. Lets look into the logic. What that person is saying is that, presumable correctly, the woman is weaker and less likely to defend herself. That sounds fair enough. But what about other less fashionable situations where someone is not able to defend themselves, say a man with arthritis, or renal failure. Or a small skinny man with glasses being hit by a well built boxer. Why is that in the slightest difference from the situaion with the woman? The answer is simple. We are told in no uncertain terms that we have to worship women … and any breach of this rule is akin to blasphemy in the medieval world.
Pingback: Robbing Ultimate Fighting Expert Proves To Be Bad Decision - Stormfront
Morghan, I would normally agree. But you NEVER suckerpunch anyone from behind. I don’t care if it’s a man or woman. The simple fact he did that was enough for all rules to be off. Yes. You do someone on the deck who is a cheat themselves. If that monkey had been killed by Huerta then I’d have laughed.
Many times I’ve seen CCTV footage of young women standing around yelling encouragement to a gang of thugs kicking an old guy to pieces. They even enjoy having a few kicks at his nose while he’s unconscious in a pool of blood. They scream out in laughter at how much fun it all is.
So, I don’t see why women should be protected. They have just won the right to fight in ALL sections of the Australian military based on the idea that there is no difference in ability between males and females. Surely, to offer them protection would be sexist and offensive in our enlightened times.
That’s what you wanted ‘ladies’.
The only protection I can think of against such a fate is to go around accompanied by a woman who is our ally and who is ready to step in to prevent us being torn apart by white knights unleashed by a female agressor. Most of the time the presence of such a woman at our side will be enough to make us immune. Men need a woman as bodyguard to be safe.
Dana White can go fuck himself. Assholes.