An articulate and reflective PUA ruminates upon the moral issues of being paid by horny young males in order to help them get knee-deep in pussy :
Generally, we are getting students who are seriously vulnerable to the predations of women. Like a dog who chases a car down the street and then doesn’t know what to do when it catches up, like the fool who grabs a tiger by the tail, we in the seduction community are teaching guys to walk into a trap. What trap?
- False paternity claims and ensuing child support that will cripple them financially
- Emotional abuse from passive aggressive bitches who try to destroy your self esteem and your faith in humanity
- STDs, some of which can ruin your fertility or harm your future wife
- False rape claims that will see your reputation ruined, your career ended, and likely a long stint in jail just because some whore gets buyers remorse
Now I’m not going into the topic of whether the PUA life is a shallow one. That’s an oversold meme and I care little for it. I’m talking about this:
By encouraging naïve men to sleep with many women, we are exposing them to risks they don’t even know exist.
Like most in the MRM, I have an ambivalent attitude towards the PUA community. Some argue that it gives men control, others that it makes you a slave to pussy. At least this PUA guru is aware of the risks involved.
In brief, my politically incorrect view of ‘the Game’ is as follows : The pick-up-artist community originated in multi-cultural centers such as Toronto as a response to the inability of white geeks, earning up-to 6 figure salaries, to compete with urban black men and other ‘naturals’ in the free sexual market. This ’extension of the domain of the struggle’ constitutes the underlying theme of all of Michel Houellebecq’s novels. The economic jungle has extended into the private realm, yet with a different set of rules, a different set of winners and losers, and with no equivalent to taxation or a welfare safety net to reduce the worst discrepancies in outcome. At least for men. Older, unattractive women, the female losers in the free sexual market, have of course organised themselves through feminism into a highly effective sexual trade union that is making it increasingly dangerous or illegal for men to pursue young females. At the same time as allowing women themselves to easily cuckold their husbands and spend their massive divorce payouts in hunting for big bamboo, in nightclubs or on the beaches of Jamaica.
The differing male/female responses to the creation of the free sexual marketplace surely tell us a lot about our respective psychologies, and why men’s rights continues to make miniscule headway in comparison to the march of feminism. Men seem unable to policiticize their sexual rights (as normal, heterosexual men). Hell, most men won’t even admit that women prefer black cock. Of course, it’s true as well that most women won’t admit openly the even more obvious truth that men prefer teenage girls (many men won’t). But every woman knows in her own head that it’s the truth. This is why they are able to create world-wide political movements that transfrom social ethics within decades, whereas men can only come up with ‘the Mystery Method’, something that appeals to men individually, and our instinctive and primal need to compete with other men in order to get pussy.
Men analyse and compete, women politicize and unite.
Of course, it’s a good thing that men do not (or no longer) further their own sexual interests through the creation of spurious laws that criminilize white women having interracial sex, in the way that women have created laws that destroy men for even looking at younger females. But it’s probably also true that the only hope for the men’s rights movement is if the much larger, and more relevant to young men PUA community can become in someway politicised. Men too, have to learn that the personal has become political, and not just a game.
I would also add that, in my view, the efforts of the PUA community are an attempt to restore IQ to sexual selection (indirectly through the skill of the game, just as high male IQ was selected for previously indirectly via wealth/high status). In a sense therefore, PUAs are possiblenoble saviours of civilisation (along with Transhumanism). (The Fifth Horseman made a great comment regarding this at Anti-Feminist Tech, I haven’t yet been able to re-locate the article for the link).
Other Articles seen around the web recently :
Flashing Teenage Breasts Could lead to 5 years prison for Male
A Florida man is facing five years in prison because he photographed two teenage girls flashing their breasts on the side of the road.
Robert Lee BlevinsTurns out, the girls were 15-years-old, according to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune.
It is not clear if Robert Lee Blevins, 33, was aware of their age when he pulled his car up alongside them and snapped a photo.
This is why this blog exists, why its subtitle is the ‘rape of the male’, and why I have absolutely no regret in questioning the age of consent laws that underpin such madness.
And of course, taking photos of a bullied 15 year old girl dying in the street is pefectly legal, and no doubt will end up on a dozen sick American websites, with no objections from the FemiWhores, their sexual trade union ‘child protection’ groups, or Republican congressmen.
A glimpse of collective hysteria, 80 years into the past(misandry review)
The movie depicts an entire urban community in the grip of mass hysteria and fear as they struggle to track down and identify a child murderer. The police throw their full resources into finding the killer, but after eight months they still have nothing to show for their efforts. One of the problems that the overworked police force faces is a deluge of false allegations from a hyper-frightened public. In one poignant scene, a man who is walking down the street is approached by a little girl and asked what time it is. He gives her the time, but this act alone incites a mob of accusing onlookers, screaming that this man must be the child-killer and culminating in the police hauling him off to be questioned. Another scene shows a group of men sitting around a table in rapt attention as one reads them a newspaper article. That article prompts one of the paranoid men to accuse the one sitting directly across from him of being the killer. Threats between them ensue.
Women’s sexual peak rests atop a pile of lies (Paul Elam)
Where else but the current gender Zeitgeist can a woman with crows feet, sagging breasts, reduced sexual hormones, a vagina that does not lubricate as it once did, more difficulty conceiving and less ability to attract sexual partners of their preference, stand up and say “I am in my sexual prime,” and have everyone in their presence nod their head in agreement?
Only in a world where we tell women whatever they want to hear, no matter how ridiculous.
Here you go again repeating the old saw about most women preferring black cock, do you have any evidence for this? It’s clear most men prefer young women, but what you keep repeating about black cock is not clear at all either from personal observation or anything else. That OKcupid study shows white guys get the most responses and non-white guys get the fewest.
The only people who push this line are certain black guys and white dweebs who are very bad with girls.
Robert, take a vacation to Paris sometime, you will witness the ‘peacock’s tail’ in action (for peaccock’s tail, read black cock). If you’re a white guy with a white woman, people stare at you because it is becoming so unusual. There is a clear racial sexual heirarchy there, with blacks at the top, arabs close behind, and white males a distant last.
You have to remember that for women over 30 there are still remanents of cultural, familial disapproval for interracial dating. The number of interracial relationships grows each year, and the vast majority are white female, black male. The fastest growing ‘race’ in the UK are mixed offspring from such relationships.
BTW, do white guys tend to prefer asian women? Most white men don’t seem afraid to admit that fact, but there are far, far more wf/bm relationships than wm/af relationships.
It might be true that women still prefer white men for marriage and for raising a family (or at least beginning a family, and setting up a cuckolding later). But for sex, take a look at the female ads in any sex contact magazine.
BTW, I can’t blame any lack of success with females on the part of my white skin. I’m in my late 30′s and I still get teenage perfect 10′s trying to seduce me in the street.
You want to protect yourself from false rape claims? Well, just record any sexual relations you have with a woman in your home. The key is to only do it in your home.
As Roissy has said: Single Mothers have created an army of sluts. More than the world has ever seen.
When you’re an older guy (25-40), it’s very, very easy to have sex with young women (18-22). I have a car, my own place, and workout regularly. That’s enough to give these women the “gina tingles”, and they’re in my bed within the 2nd or 3rd “date”.
So to all the single mothers out there, I say “thank you”
Antifeminist: I live in the US where what you’re describing is certainly not the case. I was in Paris and didn’t see that either. I can only describe your reflections as delusional/masochistic, or you are likely a minority yourself.
Again I asked you for some evidence, and still you can only give anecdotal impressions. But those certainly aren’t my impressions or those of anyone I know.
I did mention ads, for example OKcupid, which is one site that girls do occasionally use, as opposed to “sex contact magazines” (wtf?) which no normal girl uses. And in OKcupid girls certainly do respond most often to white men, not black or other.
The fact that there are more bm/wf pairings than vice versa proves nothing because very few white men are interested in fat black women. The question is not the disproportion between the two kinds of pairings but whether “most women prefer black cock,” which is not only a lie but also absurd.
Again I would guess you’re either a minority yourself or a white guy who almost never gets laid. Those are the only two groups pushing this line.
Antifeminist: I don’t know if you chose to erase my last comment entirely? It’s your site that’s your business if you want to play that way. I will only ask this, do you have any actual EVIDENCE for your claim, or not? Your impressions of what you see on the street are not shared by others.
I deleted your comment because you insulted me.
They are shared by millions of people, only you dismiss them all as dweebs who can’t get laid.
They’re shared by the porn industry, which produces countless white women/black cock lust videos and makes millions from the white men who buy them.
80,000 white women travel to the carribean each year to molest black male prostitutes.
There’s a significant and growing black population in Poland. Do you know how they got there? Polish women brought them home as husbands from working in England.
The only study you’ve quoted is from a crappy celeb magazine.
I’m telling you, if you go to Paris, you will see MORE white women with black men than with white men. I regularly see one black man with 4 or 5 white french girls on his arms IN LONDON!!
In France there is absolutely no taboo against interracial sex. Do you live in a multi-cultural city?
You might also like to have a look at this : http://www.isteve.com/islovecolorblind.htm
I cited one study it doesn’t matter where it appeared initially. It’s a pretty solid study in so far as OKCupid is the only place where girls really go for online dating. Roissy quoted it and had a long post on it. You cite no studies at all. Just impressions. You also mentioned ads in “sex contact magazines” as evidence and you expect to be taken seriously on female dating and hooking up practices?
Porn industry? Yes, your idea appeals to male dweebs who are addicted to porn, this was my point. Are you seriously using kinds of porn as evidence for the preferences of white women? You are aware those are paid actors? And that, as you agree, this industry caters mainly to sexually frustrated dweebs (who probably also have latent homosexual tendencies, there is no other explanation for it).
Again, where is your evidence? Not what you think you see on the street in Paris or London. Anyone can talk about how they saw some guy on the street, or about the fact that a black football player has a white gf. I haven’t been to London in a long time but I was in Paris a few years ago and I certainly didn’t see what you claim. In fact France is one of the places where interracial dating is still very much frowned on and very rare, much more so than the US for sure. But again, everyone has anecdotes, I’m asking you to bring some evidence.
Your impressions are shared by millions? They are pushed by three groups mainly: black guys and other minorities, a few white dweebs with latent homosexual desires for black men who are addicted to interracial porn, and the Jewish media, which is why this idea gets propagated and why I’m trying to call you on it. They are hard at work trying to push it in movies and so on, but it is contradicted by every statistic and every real life observation I’ve seen.
Are you a white man of pure European descent (non-Jewish and non-Semitic background)?
@Robert, I do have to sleep, and I just woke up to see your comment and another accusing me of deleting it and of being Jewish.
BTW, can you understand that I’m not promoting anything? I’ve made it clear countless times on this blog that I think the female attraction to black men is objectifying, instrumentalizing, and degrading. But is is a fact – a general white female tendency to prefer black men (as sex objects). It’s important to point out in the context of this anti-feminist blog because it symbolises the total sexual power that women now have in society.
I go to Paris nearly every month. Paris is famous for the white female/black male thing. The most famous novelist in Europe, Michel Houellbecq, writes novels for his millions of French readers, that assume it. But then I guess they’re all white dweebs.
BTW, do you realise that Roissy is Jewish?
I’m not Jewish, and I don’t regard being mistook for being Jewish as an insult, but you’re plainly intending it to be so, and if you insult me one more time I’ll block you.
Anti-Feminist
I’ve been thinking a lot about your theory and I’m wondering. Could it be interpreted in the following way?
The technologies you described shifted the balance of power (albeit modestly) in favor of men. This caused the ‘gravy train’ to dry up for all but the hottest women forcing the rest into the job market while simultaneously seeking alternate access to male resources (taxation) and legislation aimed at restricting the sexual market as much as possible.
This would mean that once upon a time the average woman commanded a lot more sexual power than they do now. The birth control pill didn’t so much force women to take power from men as it ‘demoted’ them to the level of male leaders. (No longer a group powerful enough to just sit back and collectively ‘pull the strings’)
Women didn’t mind men ‘wearing the pants’ so long as women ran stuff behind the scenes but when confronted, for the first time ever, with the prospect of a REAL patriarchy they changed their tune.
Perhaps we have erroneously conflated loudness with power.
Perhaps we merely think they are gaining power because they have become for visible and vocal.
But what if that is really a sign that they are loosing it? And that sexbots and other technologies are simply waiting on the horizon to hammer the final nails in their coffin.
I’ve become quite optimistic of late.
It took me a while to figure out what PUA is. I had to consult google. It seems to be “Pick Up Artist”. It would be good if you stated this somewhere in the beginning of your article.
You know I admire your work, actually got influenced and inspired by your main thesis of the sexual trade Union, a missing link in my understanding, an issue I was unaware of before. I agree with most things you say. If there are differing opinions on some perpheral issues, I just ignore it.
About the white women want black dick issue, I just keep quiet and ignore it. You offer anecdotal evidence for it. I see no hard proof in research, but maybe it exists. It probably is cultural, varies in different places. The main point is, it is IRRELEVANT to most of our Mens Right’s issues. I don’t care enough about it.
Also, I think the average female sex tourists in Jamaica might actually have more liberal attitudes and more sympathy for male sexual behavior then other women. They might be Men’s Rights’ friends.
And I think it is none of our business to meddle in their private sex life. Just as feminists and the law should not meddle with consensual sex with adolescents, possession of drawings and artwork depicting underage sex, etc. But I just find this entire issue of white-women-preferring-black-sex-partners or not not central to our interest. So I did not even bother to mention it until now that it gets focussed on.
And listen, I am not squeamish on race issues, I have some very politically incorrect race difference issues on my blog (which, again, are not central to the issues YOUR blog focusses on)
Race differences in intelligence, running, etc.
One can make a very valid point that blacks are, on average, more sexual, have bigger penises, more testosterone, more fast twitch muscles, more capacity for fighting, less long term planning and family commitment, more twin births, earlier menarche, more fuzzy behavior already as newborns, more propensity to crime, etc.
Race differences in intelligence: how research changed my mind to overcome the “all races are equal” dogma.
The race issue is related to human-stupidity.com because political correctness represses unbiased research and prevents acting upon research results. Actually, black males natural sexuality makes them the men’s movement natural allies, they probably would never support the insane feminists legislation. My anecdotal observation is that even black females are not too actively involved in repressing males.
Youtube Spoof of “Catch a Predator”: Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment. I just love this video!
Of course, men could go on the counter-offensive and fight women with their own weapons. Has any of these women ever gone out with a 17 year old Jamaican guy? But frankly, I would rather not go down to the level of these women.
Let us focus on the essential issues and not get lost on peripheral issues.
Hi HS, I’m not in any way condemning these women as such, I’m simply pointing out how unfairly society treats men’s sexual lives these days. I’m aware that illiberaly trying to ban female sex tourism doesn’t further justice or men’s interests. Something that should get you angry,and something that infuriates me, is the way that men’s rights activists are obsessed with proving that as many women as men are ‘sex predators’ and ‘paedophiles’. I think there are at 4 or 5 such links on the front page of reddit men’s rights at this very moment, all getting massively upvoted.
Also, I have nothing against black people, although it’s a fair point that my language on the black cock issue might alienate black male readers and potential supporters.
And I’m happy to disagree and debate with people here. Robert called me a white dweeb who can’t get laid, and then a Jew ( I don’t regard that as an insult, but he intended it as such), simply because I have a different opinion from him.
HS, your blog is great, and I love your sharing is caring plugin (going to install it myself this week). You should link exchange with more men’s rights sites. Actually,as your blog covers wider ground, you could exchange with a broader selection of sites. It’s only through linking to other sites, and getting links back that the search engine traffic will come.
I also welcome your suggestion to Highwayman to start his own blog. I would definately link to it and help to promote it. Otherwise he can post a guest article here on my site if he wants. You’re also welcome to do the same if you want. Also any of the other regular commentators here.
My opinion may be a bit biased here because PUA marketers have always rubbed me the wrong way especially Doc Love, he is quite arrogant and seems to insult and shame men into buying his product.
That beign said YES men need to understand the risks involved WRT to relationships with women in contemporary society. In particular men need to understand just what can happen to them in a divorce/child custody situation so that they make informed decisions as to whether or not they want to get married or cohabitate with a woman. Many men really don’t understand what they are getting into when contemplating getting married or starting a family and one of the more important duties that MRAs or anti-feminists have is to educate men as much as possible in order to help them make informed decisions. That being said language such as “we are giving dynamite to children” and “?Emotional abuse from passive aggressive bitches who try to destroy your self esteem and your faith in humanity” is quite extreme and to me seems like a mirror image of the victim mentality espoused by many women’s advocates, mentalities that I oppose as they often fuel demand for laws criminalizing male sexuality.
WRT sexually frustated young men that this PUA is talking about…longing for female companionship (romantic or sexual or both) is a very powerful force and many men who are deprived of such things experience a lot of pain but…instead of shelling out money to PUAs and engaging in lots of casual sex…perhaps they should consider patroning sex care workers (escort girls and massage parlour attendants) many of which offer GFE (Girlfriend Experience) so an encounter with one may be a lot more intimate than many might think especially if you repeat with them. There are many different types of sex care workers some are very kind and feminine others put on the porn star act so they can learn about interacting with different types of women. Patroning sex care workers can help with your intimate life to by making you feel less desperate and more relaxed aroung attractive women and these traits will make you more attractive to women.
here one from friday.
http://www.lauraagustin.com/important-enemies-hating-sex-work-academics-or-hating-research
Houellebecq is actually an authority I’d respect so that’s a fair argument BUT he’s a fiction writer who greatly exaggerates depravity and perversion for the same reason others do. Is he making a point about the venality and vulgarity of “liberated” women? Yes. But you can’t use his this comic exaggeration in his books to back up “most women prefer black cock” which is an absurdity.
I guess we can see-saw back and forth between your impressions and mine, but given how extreme your claim is you should back it up with more than just private impressions. I was in Paris a while ago, not nearly as often as you, but certainly didn’t notice anything like what you say. Since I posted on your site I’ve also asked friends who were there recently and they don’t back you up. I highly doubt you would ever see a pretty French girl with a black guy.
It may be that in Paris men are more sensitive to whenever this does appear in public and it causes more of an impression/anger precisely because it is more rare and it is not accepted. There IS a reason a few men have the impression you do but that again has less to do with reality than with the image pushed by Jewish and Judaized media and also with the tendency to generalize from one or two cases you see that make you angry.
Most white women wouldn’t touch a black guy with a long stick. In Europe, even less than the US, I’ll stand by that yes.
Not that it directly disproves what you’re saying, I realize marriage and sex are different, but in the US according to Sailer’s most recent article about 1% of white women marry black men. Certainly it would be a lot more than that if “most women prefer black cock.” And the US is a much more mixed country than any European one. Most “interracial” marriages in the US are between whites and “hispanics” (who are white/Spanish no one’s marrying mestizos) or between white guys and Asian girls (and no, most white guys don’t prefer Asian girls, a minority of white guys settle for Asian girls because they don’t think they can get hot enough white girls). And the OKCupid study on how women of all races respond most often to white guys, and white women in particular don’t respond very often to black guys, is solid proof unless you can bring up some other study.
And these statements aren’t extreme??? O.K, next time I am in paris I’ll rest my video camera on the table of a street cafe pavement for 5 minutes, and I’ll post the results here.
Pingback: Linkage is Good for You: White is Right Edition (NSFW)
There seems to be some confusion here from the guy who wrote the “human stupidity” comment and from antifeminist when he agrees with him about the race problem. It doesn’t matter if you think in your libertarian ideology that black men SHOULD be allies in the fight against feminism. As things stand they are already allies of feminism. Feminism is a movement specifically against Western civilization and Western men. It is allied with blacks, Muslims, liberal Jews and others who are hostile to Western civilization.
Hostility to white men and the civilization they built: this is what these groups have in common. If you miss that because you “don’t think we should get involved in their private lives” you lose. Every healthy group of men will not tolerate their women fucking around, not to speak of fucking around with outsiders. In traditional that is male-run societies the penalty for this is usually death, and that’s as it should be.
@Robert I don’t think there is any confusion on my part.
It appears to me that it is you who are coming across as a little confused. On the one hand you are adamanat that only a handful of white women are attracted to black men, and on the other, you are saying that white women interbreeding with black men is going to spell the end of western civilisation. Not only that, but you appear to want to hold me personally responsible for it, even though you are adamant that what I am ‘promoting’ is in fact a personal delusion based on the alleged fact that I can’t get laid (or am Jewish).
I agree that white women sexually selecting for cock size instead of IQ is a threat to civilisation. I think there are moral issues involved in wealthy white women paying to have sex with rastafarians who have the mental age of 12 year old middle-class white girls (ave IQ of 70). Just as I believe there are moral issues in a man paying to have sex with a 12 year old middle-class girl. I agree that ‘races’ have at least as much right to exist as do obscure breeds of penguin, whose preservation we seem to care about an awful lot more. However, I think that in a sense, the question as to whether or not Europeans will still be white in 200 years time is irrelevant given that in 200 years time, we are likely not to be ‘human’ anymore.
I’ve always been clear in that I believe that cultural marxism is not the ultimate explanation of feminism, but simply the ideological mask it wears to protect its true underlying sexual motives.
Incidentally, I don’t think black men are going to be put off the men’s rights movement by whatever I or others print on this website. First of all, there is no men’s rights movement, apart from a handful of organizations such as the national coalition for men, of which I am not a member and have no affiliation to (but who I obviously support). There are just hundreds of bloggers, like myself, airing their views on feminism. The fact that there are black MRAs such as Thugtician, who come across as black power supremacists, in no way deters white men from becoming supporters of men’s rights. I fully support Thugitican’s strident stance and unashamed reaching out to the anger of black men.
However, I think that feminism will be defeated, not by an angry army of a million black and white men marching in the streets, but by a relative handful of intelligent and informed people, understanding what feminism is, and having the knowlege and position to manipulate the coming social and technological trends in our favour. To be honest, I would rather have 100 ‘Fifth Horsemen’ on our side, than a million angry black men.
Also, the idea that there is a conscious jewish conspiracy to destroy western civilisation is absurd. Are people like Roissy party to it? You seem happy to count him as an anti-feminist. I don’t know if it’s a good idea to alienate a group of people who, by your own admission, at least partly dictate social and political trends.
I’m not a traditionalist and I don’t believe in the myth of patriarchy.
Finally, returning to the okcupid ‘study’. My position is that ‘women prefer black cock’. I never said that the majority of lonely 30 year old + women, looking for a stable relationship with a solvent partner, prefer black men to fulfill those needs. Female adverts in sex contact magazines are going to be more relevant to the truth of my posistion rather than an online dating site. And you don’t seriously think that these women who have to use these sites are representative of women in general do you? Men and women are different in that men seek young attractive partners for both sex and marriage. Women, on the hand, tend to seek different things when they are seeking a casual relationship, a serial monogamous relationship, or a long term relationship/marriage. Similarly, they want different things depending on whether they are 20 or 40, attractive or unattractive.
There is no scientific ‘study’ that proves a sexual preference for black men, because no such study would be acceptable in today’s society.
You are exaggerating, I never said that women preferring black men for sex (which I don’t think they do) spells the end of civilization. I said two things, first that feminism is not an isolated movement but part of a broader anti-white revolt that also includes blacks, third world minorities, and Jews. There is a reason these groups and also the gay-rights people are in fact allied in real life. It isn’t a conspiracy and it isn’t secret. The fact that a handful of Jews are not hostile to whites doesn’t say anything, much like the fact that you can find an occasional black who can do calculus doesn’t tell you anything. On the whole Jews understand themselves and openly so right now as enemies of Western civilization and of white men, I have news for you they are already “alienated,” (hostile). In the US in fact there isn’t anything that unites Jews except hostility to WASP’s and more broadly to whites and to Christianity. For every Roissy or Paul Gottfried there are 100 or more Elena Kagans, Robert Reich’s, etc. And these aren’t just impressions, there are polls on this.
But this matter aside whatever you may think about Jews, my first point stands: black guys will not be your allies against feminism, they are already allies of feminists now, and also allied with other anti-white-male groups. This isn’t about men’s rights but about power and who has it.
My second point was that a healthy nation dominated by men doesn’t allow its women to fuck outsiders, that’s all I said and that’s historical fact. Libertarianism and rights-for-men isn’t the answer. By outsiders I don’t mean just blacks but any other outsider. And it isn’t the fucking outsiders that spells the end of civilization but what it signifies, which is that the men of the nation have surrendered their power. I don’t know what you mean when you say you don’t believe in patriarchy. To me that means you don’t believe in civilization. There has never been any civilization that is gender-equal and ours will soon fall because of this among other things.
On the point on which we started arguing you say OKCupid results are not valid, and you make a good argument, yes that’s possible that it’s not direct evidence. But no girl in her right mind places ads in sex contact magazines. And OKcupid has a considerable number of women that are in their 20′s and looking for sex. The fact that you keep on insisting sex contact magazines are a reliable source of women’s preferences for sex partners should put in doubt your ability to read female psychology in general.
There are no studies but I mentioned two measures, OKcupid and interracial marriage stats that, while not definitive are indirect measures and related. You mention no evidence at all. You would have a much better case that white women prefer (white) Latino lovers, whom they do actually marry at relatively high rates. It would actually be easy to make a study on racial preferences in hooking up and not as politically incorrect as you think. In the absence of such a study or any other concrete, even circumstantial, evidence all you have are your impressions. I will remind you there are other impressions on this subject, for example that black men have bigger cocks, which are known to be wrong (there have been studies on that). But if you wanted to argue that you could do it the same way you’re doing now, that you saw some porn vids, that you heard it on a TV show, and so on. Simply put, I asked you for some evidence and all you came up with was an interpretation of Houellebecq and the fact that you saw some black guys with white girls on the street in Paris and London. This doesn’t cut it.
The reason I want to call you out on this is that despite the fact that you think you’re not promoting anything, you are in fact, intentionally or not, promoting a piece of propaganda that is rooted in Jewish cultural distortion and hostility to whites. If you look at things historically you can see Jewish activists doing the same in the 1930′s but not about blacks but about the working class (saying that all women prefer to fuck tough working-class guys and that rich people are impotent and so on). This should give you an idea of the origin of this piece of propaganda and its intent.
Some places where this propaganda has not made any headway are eastern Asia and Latin America. Society and media in these places accurately represents women’s sexual preference for white men. Despite a liberal sexual market black men have no game in Latin America.
QUOTE (from Robert): “Every healthy group of men will not tolerate their women fucking around, not to speak of fucking around with outsiders. In traditional that is male-run societies the penalty for this is usually death, and that’s as it should be.”
So you want to EXECUTE white women who have sex with non-whites? I bet you just love white women to death don’t you? The types of men you describe are not “healthy” either they sound more like people with insecurity problems gone mad. And what about shy white male computer nerds who found love after winning over an asian girl? Do you want to execute them as “race traitors” too?
If white men are in such high demand (and I actually agree with you that white men do pretty well on the interracial dating market in North America…I don’t know about the situation in Europe or Latin America so I cannot comment) then WHY would they need to take protectionist stances (particularly the barbaric practices you advocate)WRT interracial sex…particularly when you yourself state that very few white women date non-whites anyway?
If anything isn’t the lack of possesiveness on the part of white men a sign of strength? Could it be that because white men can stand on their own 2 feet that they don’t need to keep thier women on a leash? Is it not a sign of empathy and reciprocity on the part of (contemporary) white men to free up the interracial marketplace somewhat since some white men themselves desire non-white women? Could it be that this lack of possesiveness, demonstration of security and reciprocity on the part of (again contemporary not necessarily historical) white men be among the things that attract women to white men? Think about it.
Highwayman…
No I don’t want to execute or not execute anyone, I’m talking about a simple historical fact. Men protect the women of their tribe or nation from outsiders, it’s just a fact of history. The only men who don’t do this are defeated and emasculated men. “Secure” men are possessive of their women. They don’t let their sisters, daughters, etc., get hate-fucked by outsiders. And you should believe that’s what it is. Every time an outsider (not just a black, but an Asian, an Arab, an Indian) fucks a white woman, they’re hate-fucking her. They’re doing it because they believe they’re fucking you over, schmuck.
Your reference to white men and Asian girls shows you don’t get it. There’s no sexual equality in nature, and I don’t believe in sexual equality. It’s not the same for a man to bang the women of other tribes (usually tribes that have been conquered or are too weak to protect their women) as it is to let outsiders bang one’s women. Only stupid white men don’t understand this dynamic of honor. Other men in the world understand it, including black men by the way; they don’t like it when you walk through their neighborhood with a black woman. That’s the normal response. Do you understand that when Jewish media pushes a demented white celeb girl who bangs black guys that she’s dissing your fathers, your son? Saying that you’re biologically inadequate and should be replaced? Do you understand the meaning of such messages, pushed relentlessly by the hostile elite, is to rub it in your face? Like I said I happen not to agree with antifeminist, who seems to have come to believe the Jewish psyops as real, in fact despite all these things most women of all races continue to prefer white men, but do you understand the INTENT behind such things?
The rest of your message is too ridiculous to answer, how can you possibly think a woman likes a man because he’s “secure” enough to let her bang outsiders? That’s like saying that your girlfriend will like you more when you show her you’re “secure” enough to trust she’ll come back to you after she bangs other men. You have a gross misunderstanding of female psychology if you actually believe the reason that white men are in high demand is because they’re not possessive of their women. They’re in high demand despite of that.
No. The reason white men are in high demand across the world, despite Jewish propaganda and despite the fact that many white men are not possessive of their women, is simple. White men are preferred because they’re perceived as being higher-status, wealthier, and finally, more physically attractive.
Finally let me answer something from what antifeminist said. He claimed it would be politically incorrect to have studies showing white women prefer black men for sex. I disagree. In fact there’s nothing better the establishment would love than to push such studies as evidence that more white girls need to “jump on the train” and get with the program. I don’t know how he can think this when black man-white woman relationships and images are relentlessly pushed in Jew-controlled media and it’s becoming almost “racist” to show a pure white family that is happy and well-adjusted. Why would the establishment who is pushing such images ALL THE TIME in advertising, movies and other things, and who is pushing this propaganda, be reluctant to show studies showing that white women prefer black men sexually? There are few things they’d love to do more. This makes me think that such studies have in fact been carried out but are not published for the obvious reason, that it shows women of all races prefer white men despite all the propaganda of the multicultural regime.
In Response to Robert….
QUOTE: “No I don’t want to execute or not execute anyone, I’m talking about a simple historical fact.”
Backtracking now are we? You clearly stated initially that death for mixing with outsiders is “how it should be”. And what do you mean by “execute or not execute anyone”? Quite a slipery one aren’t you?
QUOTE: “Men protect the women of their tribe or nation from outsiders, it’s just a fact of history.”
Oh yeah so executing women for race mixing is “protecting” them talk about orwellian doublespeak. Men SHOULD protect women from harm (ex: rape, assault…etc) NOT arbitrarily prevent relationships just because they involve someone of a different racial background.
QUOTE: “Every time an outsider (not just a black, but an Asian, an Arab, an Indian) fucks a white woman, they’re hate-fucking her.”
That does not follow.
QUOTE: “It’s not the same for a man to bang the women of other tribes (usually tribes that have been conquered or are too weak to protect their women) as it is to let outsiders bang one’s women. Only stupid white men don’t understand this dynamic of honor. ”
It’s called RECIPROCITY.
QUOTE: “including black men by the way; they don’t like it when you walk through their neighborhood with a black woman.”
As long as they don’t try to fuck with me or my woman I really could not care less. You seem to be implying in your post that it is natural for men to want to actively prevent interracial relationships involving “thier” women therefor they ought to do so. That is called NATURALISTIC FALLACY. Just because it MIGHT be “natural” for things to be a certain way that does not mean that that is how things should be.
QUOTE: “The rest of your message is too ridiculous to answer, how can you possibly think a woman likes a man because he’s “secure” enough to let her bang outsiders? That’s like saying that your girlfriend will like you more when you show her you’re “secure” enough to trust she’ll come back to you after she bangs other men. ”
False Equivalence.
theantifeminist
That is non sense. The most popular interracial combination is (by far) white male/asian female. Black male/white female is a fairly distant second.
“I don’t know how he can think this when black man-white woman relationships and images are relentlessly pushed in Jew-controlled media and it’s becoming almost “racist” to show a pure white family that is happy and well-adjusted. ”
That is absolutely RIDICULOUS, I can’t believe what I just read! The black man-white woman relationship is absurdly taboo to this day. You do not see BM/WW in the media. This is a large misconception that both insecure and bitter white males and black females exaggerate beyond belief.
The movie industry is very against giving a black male lead a white female love interest, and when the very rare times they do, it is insanely chaste. They do not even kiss (ex. Hancock, where Charlize Theron plays Will Smith’s wife). What was the last love scene you saw between a white actress and black actor? This is unacceptable in Hollywood.
In fact, its the exact opposite; there are more black female-white man pairings up in television and movies than the other way around by far. Especially if the black female is a popular singer, like Whitney Houston in The Bodyguard or Beyonce Knowles in Cadillac Records. Television shows like 21 Jump Street, The Jeffersons, Boy Meets World, Saved By The Bell, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, etc. have all featured black female/white male couples, or a white male interested in a black female (Screech being the most famous example). Films like A Bronx Tale (directed by Robert De Niro, who has mainly dated and married black women) and the exploitative Monster’s Ball that has a VERY explicit sex scene with the most popular black actress Halle Berry, and to top it off, the character he plays is a racist! Not only that, Berry won an Oscar for her portrayal of Leticia. A scene like that with a black male and white woman would never materialize. See its okay for a white man to have ‘fun times’ with hot non white women (Asian women almost never have Asian male love interests in the few media exposure they do have) but black men with a beautiful white woman? Fat chance.
Here’s a good list of the many films that have black women/white men interracial romance in movies.
http://www.jeffandcorey.com/ELIG.html
angela: you’re a dumb twat.
there are plenty more examples like this,
http://www.antiwhitemedia.blogspot.com/
Here is an article that I think might warrant your attention, AF. With your kind permission I’m going to post-copy some comments, both pro and con, that illuminate this important topic. The delusions of some hard-boiled racialists concerning women are truly astounding. They need to be countered.
What does this prove?
WRT the OKcupid study many on Roissy’s blog have commented that it is a poor study in that it has sampling bias problems (it has a majority white readership so many of the non-whites who read it may be non-whites who gravitate more towards white people…hence the results are skewed towards indicating that white men are most popular with all races). The results just make no sense I mean come on who really believes that many East Indian women prefer non-East Indian men over their own men, EI women almost never date or marry outside of their race. A danger in putting too much faith in a poor study like this is that some white guys who take the study too seriously could develop real ego problems around non-white women and mess things up.
A much more interesting study on interracial dating preferences is the Fishman Study, it still might have sampling problems but the results certainly seem more realistic. You can read about it here: http://www.slate.com/id/2177637/
According to this study most women prefer men of thier own racial background. What is really interesting is that the study found no evidence of so-called “Yellow Fever” or the alledged white male preference for east asian women. What they found is that while east asian women prefered east asian men they had non-discriminatory attitudes towards white men. The openess of white men to interracial dating combined with the non-discriminatory attitudes (towards white men) of east asian women resulted in WM/AF pairings being the most common interracial couple…not any racial preference on the part of either white men or asian women. So…east asian women don’t be too quick to dismiss white men who are interested in you as “yellow fever” types and white guys don’t let your ego get to you asian women prefer asian men not whites but they are willing to give you a chance so try to keep relations good.
Good work Highwayman. Personally I’ve dated a number of Asian girls, and gotten the usual ‘yellow fever, submissive asian woman fetish’ stick/jealousy from white females. In fact, I don’t really find asian females sexually attractive and rarely jerk off to asian porn. I just find Asian girls more approachable (from experience, not ‘cultural stereotyping’). Even when they’re not interested in you, they’re usually polite about it. So even an AFC like me ends up confident about approaching asian girls and going home witha couple of phonenumbers.
Having said that, asian/caucasian mixed girls do tend to be absolutely stunning.
Once again, sorry for having to approve your comment before it get’s posted, don’t know how to fix that. I probably disapproved one of your comments by mistake in the past and now it won’t let me automatically approve.
Asian girls generally are not my cup of tea either (with some exceptions) but I find the phenomenon of WM/AF interracial dating to be an interesting one in terms of how it impacts the sexual marketplace. Asian women, from my experience, are difficult to get but there standards tend to be different, they are more forgiving WRT to shyness but they are more demanding in terms of educational and professional achievement and socio-economic status. Canada’s large asian population has basically been a blessing to shy, hard-working, middle to upper-middle class white men.
I completely agree with you about asian/caucasian mix girls (AKA eurasian girls across the atlantic) many white and asian men that I know find them to be more attractive than both pure race white or asian girls (especially if they have caucasian type breasts and figures and asiatic hair and skin quality). My favorite public example of a super attractive eurasian girl is actress Phoebe Cates, she was in many 1980s movies, she still looks good today in her middle age.
Just googled Phoebe Cates and she certainly was absolutely gorgeous as a teen and is holding up well for a woman close to 50.
You might have heard of Maria Ozawa, I believe she is Candian French/ japanese mix.
BTW, the following video is NSFW : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbZP178WVBY
I’ve just worked out…duh… why I usually need to mod your comments. It’s because you often add a link and I’ve got the spam setting to switch off auto-mod if any links are contained in the comment. I’ll try to install a spam plugin so that it filters out the hundreds of spambot comments with links that I get and allows me to auto-approve the links of contributers.
No I never heard of Maria Ozawa until now, thanks for the info. Some other beautiful eurasians are Rosa Kato (Italian/Japanese), Maggie Q (Polish/Vietnamese), Kristen Kreuk (Dutch/Chinese), Lisa Maria Scott (Scottish/Japanese) and Kelly Hu (English/Chinese).
Posting some comments from TOO Blog article. Discuss.
me says:
September 2, 2010 at 6:46 AM
and for those who think porn is harmless or we are being ‘puritanical’ – it is tapping into one of the strongest impulses known to man – as addictive as any illegal drug – and as damaging.
Even Christian communities are struggling with this since it is EVERYWHERE now – and exposure is as close as a mouse click away (vs the old days were social stigma and zoning made it hard to access. – you had to ;walk in ‘ to an ‘adult’ book store.
eurodele says:
September 3, 2010 at 8:20 AM
Nonsense, fgh.
Smut is a predominantly Jewish enterprise, and in this alone, we see the clear moral inferiority of the Jews. To use pornography as they are using it, for the dual purpose of profiteering and fueling cultural Marxism, is utterly contemptible…not only because it mirrors the age-old fact that Jews are typically major proprietors of hard and soft-core porn and white slavery, but because it is clearly being applied in a spirit of virulent loathing for Christianity, Christian values, and race-hatred against Whites.
True, many Whites have been sucked in as “clients”…but not that many, and most of those who have been hooked would probably have remained on the straight and narrow without Jew-driven cultural erosion. Porn is quite lucrative, but so is dealing heroin, and the White majority plainly goes for neither.
As far as concerns a statement like “whites are some of the most depraved, disgusting people in the world”, where the hell does something like that even come from?
Did you mean “Jews are some of the most depraved, disgusting people in the world”? If so, you should do a little reading – Jews hold themselves apart from the rest of humanity, both genetically and religiously.
Please, try to cultivate a little awareness.
eurodele says:
September 3, 2010 at 9:45 AM
”Smut” is only a predominantly Jewish enterprise in the sense that it’s Jews that collect most of the profits from it, but the overwhelming majority of performers in this profession are white Europeans. Indeed, it is no surprise that Jews run the porn industry seeing how in the past they practically had a monopoly on brothels in the great European cities. But the reason Jews could and can continue to develop and maintain these ”industries” is the fantastic European demand for them.
Jewish smut is mainly marketed to European and American Whites (that’s the majority of the market being targeted), so of course most of it is consumed by those groups. Jewish producers seek White performers for the simple reason that Whites are more attractive to their majority clientele than Jews or other non-Whites, and that’s “good for sales”.
“That’s a very strange statement you make. It’s in the same line as claiming that one would not have committed a rape or murder if he had not crossed paths with a potential victim.”
A very poor analogy. We’re not just talking about the creation of opportunities for debauchery, but the deliberate systematic erosion of White Christian values and moral fiber (resistance to degenerate influences).
“Most of the peoples of the world tend to not share the liberal views of most whites, and tend to regard some of our practices, particularly pornography, as repulsive.”
You’re making the same basic error as fgh. That a minority of Whites inevitably consume some of the porn that is constantly shoved in their faces by the Jews among them says nothing of the inherent preferences or moral proclivities of the typical White person.
Julian Lee says:
September 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM
The animal lust unrestrained by religion leads to all manner of perversity and all manner of degradation. All White regeneration and rebirth hinges upon moral regeneration, which hinges upon religious regeneration.
Matthias says:
September 4, 2010 at 12:12 AM
When Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, they force-broadcast pornography on all the TV stations. Why? What does pornography have to do with war? Why do jews pump pornography into every society they invade? Why is pornography ubiquitous in the West? Why is the porn industry jewish?
Porn is a weapon in the war jews have launched on humanity to facilitate goyim-control. As always, their narrow ethnic interest objectives (control through porn) are dressed up as universal moral imperatives (freedom of speech) that are either irresistable to, or, over the heads of, the average white lemming.
Fascinating interview on this subject with Dr. E. Michael Jones, author of Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5P0HRDCDPQE&feature=relat
Al Brown says:
September 4, 2010 at 2:07 AM
anon2, actually the biggest audience for internet porn is non-whites, especially those from outside the US. That’s the bulk of the internet ‘visitors’. The jews wish to project a certain image of white women to these people. The flip side is that a surprisingly high percentage of actresses in porn are actually jews, drenched in peroxide and loaded with silicone. The jewish women are jealous of the ’shiksas’ but undergo all the surgery possible to look like them. One would think that the tribe would keep their women out of that business, but it probably goes back to the low regard in which jews hold their own women, although it is nothing compared to the hate and disdain they have for ‘gentiles’. Then again, being so scatological as many know, they probably see nothing wrong with jewish women being in porn. Of course the non-jewish women are sluts and pigs.
eurodele says:
September 4, 2010 at 11:52 AM
“You can try to paint it in a positive light as much as you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that whites are the ones that nourish this craft.”
As I’ve already observed, it’s not necessary to “change that fact” in order to show that most of the responsibility for the situation resides with Jews. Why is that? Because
1. Prior to the large-scale advent of Jews in North America, it was a Christian continent in which smut and its producers and consumers were morally stigmatized by the vast majority of inhabitants. (Much the same applies to Europe.)
2. Now as always, Jews are the major producers and purveyors of pornography and prostitution worldwide.
3. Jews have been working overtime during the last century to erode the moral framework of Christianity from within western civilization by every means at their disposal, including vast wealth, coherent (and often illegal and conspiratorial) political activity, and control of education and the media.
This, of course, accounts in very large measure for the fact that Jewish porn producers find White performers and number (a substantial but minority percentage of) Whites among their clientele.
In other words, any assertion that Whites buy into Jewish porn culture because of anything resembling a natural racial affinity for porn, especially as compared to other races which have not yet been targeted for Jewish corruption, is bald-faced horseshit of the kind that could come only from (1) a Jew or (2) a Jewish indoctrinee.
Now, you (Ionut) claim to be White. Therefore, in your case, the answer is clearly 2. But how does that constitute a claim of moral superiority or a license for what looks very much like race-specific, in fact genocidal, hypocrisy?
Forgive me, but it’s hard not to notice that your handle “ionut”, with a more or less obvious transposition of the second and third characters, looks very much like “in-out”, which is of course a vulgar synonym for copulation.
Why all the White-specific sexual moralization from a soi-disant White person who chooses that kind of nickname? Could we be dealing here with a race-wide projection of personal guilt?
Xanadu says:
September 4, 2010 at 12:29 PM
Quote from E. Michael Jones:
“Pornography…becomes a Jewish fantasy. Even when Catholics are involved, they are generally involved on Jewish terms. According to one industry insider, ‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools.’ The standard porn scenario became as a result a Polish Jewish fantasy, the horny Jew schtupping the Catholic shiksa. Nina Hartley, the already mentioned Jewish porn star tends to agree, ‘I have not yet met a Jewish guy who wasn’t a horny rabbit,’ she says explaining Jewish male involvement in pornography in her 1989 interview in the Jewish magazine Schmate. ‘Plus, they get to have sex with all these beautiful blonde women… Where else are you going to get a succession of shiksas [non- Jewish women] to bed you down?’
What Miss Hartley leaves out of her description is the cultural dimension. Pornography becomes a way of defiling Christian women, which, as Eldridge Cleaver pointed out in another context, is another way of defiling Christianity and all that it stands for.
‘Rape,’ according to Cleaver, ‘was an insurrectionary act.’ By defiling the white woman, Cleaver ‘was defying and trampling upon the white man’s law, upon his system of values,’ something Cleaver found ‘most satisfying’ (Soul on Ice, p. 14).
The same thing could be said of Jewish involvement in pornography. When Luke Ford asked Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, why so many Jews were involved in pornography, Goldstein, unlike Abe Foxman, did not say the connection was fortuitous. He instead got to what one might call the theological heart of the matter. ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography,’ Goldstein responded, ‘is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’
http://www.culturewars.com/2003/rabbidresner.html
Xanadu says:
September 4, 2010 at 12:31 PM
“Leading modern Jewish pornographers include Ron Braverman, John Bone, Wesley Emerson, Paul Fishbein, Herbert Feinberg AKA Mickey Fine, Hank Weinstein, Lenny Friedlander, Bobby Hollander, Rubin Gottesman, Fred Hirsch and his children Steve and Marci, Paul ‘Norman’ Apstein, Steve Orenstein, Jack Richmond (Legend CEO), Theodore Rothstein, Reuben and David Sturman, Ron Sullivan, Jerome Tanner, Armand Weston, Sam and Mitch Weston (Spinelli).
Jews accounted for most of the leading male performers of the 1970s and ’80s. Hebrew studs include Buck Adams, Bobby Astyr, (Bobby Charles) R. Bolla (Robert Kerman), Jerry Butler (Paul Siderman), Seymore Butts (Adam Glasser), Roger Caine (Al Levitsky), David Christopher (Bernie Cohen), Steve Drake, Jesse Eastern, Jamie Gillis (Jamie Gurman), Ron Jeremy (Hyatt), Michael Knight, William Margold, Ashley Moore (Steve Tucker), David Morris, George Payne, Ed Powers (Mark Arnold aka Mark Krinski), Harry Reems (Herbert Streicher), Dave Ruby, Herschel Savage (Harvey Cowen), Carter Stevens (Mal Warub), Marc Stevens, Paul Thomas (Phil Tobias), Marc Wallice (Marc Goldberg), Randy West (Andy Abrams) and Jack Wrangler.
Jewish female performers include Avalon, Jenny Baxter (Jenny Wexler), Busty Belle (Tracy Praeger), Chelsea Blake, Tiffany Blake, Bunny Bleu (Kim Warner), J.R. Carrington, Lee Carroll (Leslie Barris), Blair Castle/Brooke Fields (Allison Shandibal), Courtney/Natasha/Eden (Natasha Zimmerman), Daphne (Daphne Franks), Barbara Dare (Stacy Mitnick), April Diamond, Jeanna Fine, Alexis Gold, Terri Hall, Heather Hart, Nina Hartley (Hartman), C.J. Laing (Wendy Miller), Frankie Leigh (Cynthia Hope Geller), Gloria Leonard, Traci Lords (Nora Louise Kuzma), Amber Lynn, Tonisha Mills, Melissa Monet, Susan Nero, Scarlett O. (Catherine Goldberg), Tawny Pearl (Susan Pearlman), Nina Preta, Tracey Prince, Raylene, Janey Robbins (Robin Lieberman), Mila Shegol, Alexandra Silk, Susan Sloan, Annie Sprinkle (Ellen Steinberg), Karen Summer (Dana Alper), Cindy West, Zara Whites (Amy Kooiman) and Ona Zee (Ona Simms).
(This citation, as well as all of the subsequent citations have been taken from the discussion of Jews and pornography at the lukeford.com website, all of which have been removed by the cite’s new owners.)
Pornography is, in other words, one of the weapons which ‘Jews with an atavistic fear of Christian authority’ have turned to to weaken the dominant culture in a country and, thereby, assure that the Jews, always a minority, will go unmolested by their ‘Christian’ neighbors.”
http://www.culturewars.com/2003/rabbidresner.html
Xanadu says:
September 4, 2010 at 12:37 PM
Ionut says: September 4, 2010 at 10:33 AM
“You can try to paint it in a positive light as much as you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that whites are the ones that nourish this craft.”
Just because White women are all over the internet on porn sites, you must resist the temptation of regarding White women as having a special proclivity for debasing themselves in a way that non-white women do not. You should take three factors into consideration:
(1) Whites still form a clear majority of the American population. Naturally more White women would take to porn than non-White women, if only for statistical reasons.
(2) White women happen to be the most attractive women in the world and it’s for this reason, if no other, that they form the backbone of most porn sites. Who wants to look at unattractive non-White women when they can see attractive White ones?
(3) You seem to be totally unaware of the coercive factor in the porn industry. When a White woman allows herself to be sodomized by a black man, or when she fellates him, you would be wrong to jump to the conclusion that she is enjoying herself and doing all this voluntarily.
No, nine times out of ten she is in an abusive relationship with a pimp who has got her hooked on heroin and who has forced her into porn and prostitution. She has to do what she is told, or she is beaten up and her next heroin fix withheld.
There is more than enough evidence to show that many white prostitutes/porn actresses are in actual physical pain with bruised breasts and torn vaginas as a result of brutal sex with men they absolutely abhor.
They are sex slaves, working under extreme coercion, usually under the thumb of the Jewish mafia who not only recruit the White porn prostitutes but also hire the black studs to screw them.
These are the sober facts.
Xanadu says:
September 5, 2010 at 5:02 AM
Kooler than Jesus says:
September 4, 2010 at 11:47 PM
Xanadu: Blah blah blah blah…..
Kooler: What evidence, Xanadu? Let’s see it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don’t make things up, Kooler. In an informal blog like this, I don’t have the time or energy to give a link for every statement I make. Even the writers in the NYT don’t have to give footnotes, listing sources for every darn thing they say.
However, I’ll try to dig up my sources, though it will take me a long time. I have read so any articles on this subject over the last year. General impressions form in the mind…and what I say about female coercion in pornography is absolutely true.
Surely you know that most prostitutes work for pimps? And they generally relate to their pimps in a sadomasochistic way. Their pimps are dominant men who delight in seeing them degraded. They often force them into have sex with black men — and even with dogs.
Don’t you know that Linda Lovelace (of Deep Throat fame) was forced to have sex with a dog on the instructions of her sadistic pimp?
She felt horrible about it, especially when this became widely known, but it made no difference to her career as a porn star. The sicker the better it seems.
Her pimp of course denied coercing her into it.
I tell you, Kooler, no attractive woman like Linda Lovelace (a Roman Catholic too) would dream of having sex with a dog for the sheer filthy pleasure of it. It’s sick. Totally sick. And Linda Lovelace claimed in her Autobiography that she did it at gunpoint.
This is what sadistic men make submissive women do to degrade and humiliate them. Pain for pleasure. That’s the name of the game.
If you doubt this, just ask yourself what Donovan’s article is all about. Isn’t it about a man getting a sick pleasure from seeing his own wife being degraded and humiliated by a black man?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ll see if I can find some links. Most of my information comes from anti-porn sites in which former porn actresses blow the lid on their past lives. They tell you the things they were forced to do. Thy repeat ad nauseam that the sex act was painful and that every manifestation of pleasure given by their faces — all the oohs and ahs and orgasmic moans and groans — were fake, fake, fake!
It was hell, pure hell — but they had to pretend it was heaven. Why? Because their next heroin fix depended on them doing what they were told. Many of these wretched girl are little more than sex slaves hooked on heroin or other highly addictive drugs.
They deserve our compassion, not our contempt. They are victims. They are little birds caught in the fowler’s net.
Next time you see a white woman being screwed by a black man on a porn site, Kooler, just tell yourself this: that girl is probably a drug addict — and this is what she is being FORCED to do for her next fix.
Behind all this misery stands one entity: the Jewish mafia. The fountainhead and source of the malignancy.
Xanadu says:
September 5, 2010 at 12:25 PM
Kooler than Jesus @ September 4, 2010 at 11:47 PM
XANADU: “There is more than enough evidence to show that many white prostitutes/porn actresses are in actual physical pain with bruised breasts and torn vaginas as a result of brutal sex with men they absolutely abhor.”
KOOLER: “What evidence, Xanadu? Let’s see it.”
XANADU: “You seem to be totally unaware of the coercive factor in the porn industry. When a White woman allows herself to be sodomized by a black man, or when she fellates him, you would be wrong to jump to the conclusion that she is enjoying herself and doing all this voluntarily.
No, nine times out of ten she is in an abusive relationship with a pimp who has got her hooked on heroin and who has forced her into porn and prostitution.”
KOOLER: “Nine times out of ten?! Again, let’s see the evidence. What study was this, when was it done, by whom?”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kooler: As I explained earlier, it’s hard providing links to back up EVERY statement one makes on an informal blog like this. (I notice no one else does!). However, I’ve managed to find ONE source out of dozens of others. This reinforces EVERYTHING I said above. Stand by for a few quotations:
[1]
“Porn stars rarely get started out of a free-willed love of sexual exhibitionism. Along with poverty and broken families, childhood abuse is very common.
Often they are teenage runaways picked up by pimps. They only escape one circle of abuse by entering another; they can’t run from the pain so they go towards it. Fast forward a few years and they find themselves in a zombified state, drunk and drugged on a porn set, as they re-live the same abuse they experienced growing up.”
Porn – Watching Bruised, Drugged Prostitutes
Richard Evans – Henry Makow.com February 22, 2010
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=12217
BTW, Ignore the Jewish infiltrator on this site who will immediately attempt to rubbish my argument by questioning the RELIABILITY of my source. After the ad hominem attack, this is the second oldest trick in the book for winning arguments by recourse to rhetorical tricks.
[RULE NUMBER TWO: "If your opponent provides a a backup source to bolster his argument, question either the RELIABILITY or AUTHENTICITY of his source."
— How Jews Win Arguments. Adam B]
Stand by for more supportive quotes.
Xanadu says:
September 5, 2010 at 12:33 PM
More Quotes: Brutalized Porn Actresses
“The brutality of most porn videos is obvious to anyone who has seen one. A typical film consists of one or more huge guys on steroids having violent sex with a girl. Porn users only see a well-edited film. They don’t see what happens behind the scenes; the girls that are crying and throwing up because they can’t handle the hardcore acts they are being told to do. Jersey Jaxin explains what awaits you on set: ‘Guys punching you in the face. You have semen from many guys all over your face, in your eyes. You get ripped. Your insides can come out of you. It’s never ending.”‘
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“A girl’s first time on camera can be horrific. She is disorientated under the bright lights and the sex is shockingly violent. The experience is more akin to an abusive alien abduction than a pleasurable sexual one. This is how Genevieve described her first scene: ‘It was one of the worst experiences of my life. It was very scary. It was a very rough scene. My agent didn’t let me know ahead of time… I did it and I was crying and they didn’t stop. It was really violent. He was hitting me. It hurt. It scared me more than anything. They wouldn’t stop.”
Her horror was in sharp contrast to the indifference of the crew.
‘I had bodily fluids all over my face that had to stay on my face for ten minutes. The abuse and degradation was rough. I sweated and was in deep pain. On top of the horrifying experience, my whole body ached, and I was irritable the whole day. The director didn’t really care how I felt; he only wanted to finish the video.’
Whatever artifice of control the girl had is now removed and Lubben [Shelley Lubben, reformed ex-porn actress] has described what is left as:
‘traumatised little girls living on anti-depressants, drugs and alcohol acting out our pain in front of YOU who continue to abuse us.’
Xanadu says:
September 5, 2010 at 12:38 PM
More Quotes: Brutalized Porn Actresses
“The sex you see in porn is a lie; sexual enhancement drugs are used on set. ‘Drugs are huge. They’re using viagra. It’s unnatural. The girls will be on xanax and vicodin,’ according to Sierra Sinn.
No wonder the sex is so vicious.
Perhaps there should be a disclaimer at the bottom of the screen noting what drugs the performers are on: ‘Gary is on Viagra and coke. Candy drank half a bottle of Jack Daniels and then smoked some crack. Enjoy the film.’”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“Most porn stars take drugs, in fact they are often on film to pay for their habit. The girls are traumatised and get high to numb their pain, as Becca Brat will tell you: ‘I hung out with a lot of people in the Adult industry, everybody from contract girls to gonzo actresses. Everybody has the same problems. Everybody is on drugs. It’s an empty lifestyle trying to fill up a void.’
However it is a void that cannot be filled, and as the drug abuse spirals more and more out of control their lives get dangerous. Brat said: ‘I became horribly addicted to heroin and crack. I overdosed at least three times, had tricks pull knives on me, have been beaten half to death – the only reason I am still here is God.’
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=12217
eurodele says:
September 5, 2010 at 6:55 PM
“Nevertheless, I would agree that all White women are not sluts, at least not completely – YET.”
Surely a philosophy scholar like Der Weisse Engel (Fan) understands that this sentence, with its capital “YET”, is nearly equivalent to
“(I would agree that) all White women, an aspiring slut every one, are separated from a total meltdown into frenzied super-sluthood … by the mere passage of time.”
But isn’t this very close to what White-hating tag-team misogynists fgh and inout have been proclaiming as well?
What an improbable coincidence, given that hatred of Whites and women are both aberrant and deeply pathological in nature, and therefore highly unlikely to emerge together in multiple subjects in a forum topically unrelated to misogyny (and therefore of no special attraction to misogynists).
Such a strange corner of the world this must be, where 1 + 1 + … + 1 = 1. Alice, welcome to Wonderland!
Xanadu says:
September 6, 2010 at 4:27 AM
ON MISOGYNY AND MISANDRY
I don’t wish to sound condescending, but it is clear to me that there are a few very embittered misogynists on this site — men of extraordinary intelligence too — who seem totally unaware that they victims of >social engineering.
They have a deep-seated contempt for women in general, but they fail to realize that their misogyny is the result of careful conditioning by organized Jewry.
They have a soul disease, but they don’t know who infected them with the virus.
Am I saying men ought to love and respect women more and not despise them so much? No, I am not! It’s far more complex than that.
I am saying there are grounds for misogyny.
I am saying that women are being deliberately groomed by organized Jewry to turn themselves into objects of revulsion and contempt.
The feminist movement is largely responsible for creating misogyny on a vast scale. It has accomplished this by setting out to alienate and, yes, piss off most men.
How can one blame the misogynist for hating women, given that women as a whole bend over backwards nowadays to make themselves utterly contemptible?
Who can respect a slut?
Isn’t it true that vast numbers of young women nowadays are despicable sluts — sluts who don’t even know it?
I’m not blaming the misogynist for hating women. I’m just pointing out that he has failed to understand that women are being groomed to be detestable, conditioned into becoming objects of contempt.
The misogynists themselves are largely unaware that their misogyny is a conditioned response to the reality of the New Female — the female who finds fulfillment in Sluthood.
Xanadu says:
September 6, 2010 at 4:29 AM
ON MISOGYNY AND MISANDRY (contd…)
The war between the sexes is being fomented by organized Jewry to weaken the goyim: to drive a wedge between man and woman. This weakens the family. It has a catastrophic effect on children. It creates social anarchy. This is what Jewry wants.
Don’t underestimate the virulence of misandry. Man hatred is now even more prevalent than woman hatred.
The spitting rage that some radical feminists — especially the crazed lesbian ones — feel towards the male sex, is truly beyond belief. I speak from first hand knowledge. These women hate men so much they would like to live a state of their own from which men are absolutely excluded. In their ideal world, all women would be lesbians. Normal intercourse to them is little better than rape.
The sexual sickness that is prevalent everywhere in our Western world distresses me profoundly. Men and women ought not to hate each other like this.
It’s not the way things should be.
eurodele says:
September 6, 2010 at 7:18 AM
Incisive observations, Xanadu.
I’m afraid I find your “men of extraordinary intelligence” comment a bit hard to fathom, but I suppose that giving the benefit of the doubt to even the lowest, most despicable semitic or philosemitic troll is consistent with the warm, nurturing side of femininity. Pissing all over the universal threshold which each of us must cross to reach this life – the womb in which each of us must dwell for nine intimate months or so before we draw our first breath – is, in my opinion, anything but “intelligent”. It’s as corrosive as aqua regia to the psyche, the self-integrity, of the pissbucket in question.
You correctly observe that the current situation, in which large numbers of (especially young) White women are unrepentant sluts, sluts-in-waiting, or man-hating lesbians, is the product of Jewish indoctrination. In my opinion, this is the one insult for which the Jews cannot be forgiven. Something like the second law of thermodynamics applies in reproduction; whereas it takes but one moment, one lapse into socially-conditioned whoredom, to absorb another polluting drop of negroid DNA into the White genome, this instant of racial contamination can never be undone by anything approaching natural means. At it all up, and we get (at the very least) a substantial loss of average IQ. I could forgive the Jews for everything but this; it is what makes their enmity so damaging and irreversible. They are damned for what they are doing to thousands of years of White evolution, all for the “First Amendment right” of Shlomo Wasserstein and his family members to push miscegenation on MTV and other Jew-controlled media outlets.
That being understood, there are chemical vectors to consider here as well. Hormone levels are being changed in both men and women by the widespread use of certain chemicals and biological agents in food production (e.g., BGH in dairy products) and packaging (e.g., bisphenol A in #7 plastics). Numerous formal studies prove this to a high level of confidence. So the attack on White sexuality is really multi-pronged, and cannot be completely solved by simply reversing Jewish anti-Christian indoctrination. It will take a general cleanup of the human environment, and the restoration of the normal hormonal balance in White men and women.
In other words, when we say goodbye to Jewish indoctrination, we’ll need to reform the food supply as well…and of course, engage in some remedial eugenics.
Anonymous says:
September 7, 2010 at 4:25 PM
The American porn industry is completely bankrupt and has been for at least 2-3 years now. Porn sales, DVD sales, etc have fallen off a cliff. The free internet porn that has arisen in the last few years has destroyed the Jewish monopoly on porn and the profit too. Organized Jewry is panicked about this since porn is becoming more ‘democratic’ and not controlled from the top by Jews – White couples create good porn in the comfort of their homes and give it away for free, which reduces the need for fake porn produced by Jewry.
Many rich Jews still fund porn they like – especially the interracial stuff – to subvert White nations and the psyches of Whites.
Basically the only thing keeping the Jewish controlled porn industry afloat nowadays is the money coming from the Jewish controlled Federal Reserve. But the Jewish controlled porn industry is broke, bankrupt, kaput. The web deepens…
Interesting comment at the end claiming that porn is becoming more democratic. Seems joe public still enjoys seeing big black dudes nailing white girls :
3,500,000 Google search results for – interracial porn tube http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=interracial+porn+tube
You know, this just captures the absurdity of believing that there is a deliberate Jewish conspiracy to weaken western civilisation. Probably jews are over-represented in the porn industry. But no more than they are in any other industry that makes money (or that used to make money). Jews dominate chess, but I doubt if that counts as any kind of proof other than that Jews have higher IQs than other races or cultures.
Most of those comments are retarded and it’s a waste of time engaging in debate with such people. You can’t really ‘refute’ a claim such as ‘Jews are responsible for pornography’. Does the fact that Sweden has now virtually criminilised the production of porn, whereas in the 70′s it was the world’s no.1 producer , mean that Jewish influence in Sweden has dissapeared since the 70′s? How does that tie in with the twin idea of these loons that socialism and feminism are also deliberate Jewish conspiracies to wreck civilisation, when they have strengthened in Sweden (and been responsible for suppressing porn)?
These people are nuts, all they do is make wild unsubstantiated claims and quote mine. Many of these white nationalist types are very sex negative and can be very supportive of high age of consent laws, the suppression of erotica and the sex trade, banning interracial sex…etc basically close the sexual freemarket.
To give just one example of what I mean check out this link here: http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/09/with_the_age_of.php
You can see the white nationalists over at American Renaissance freaking out over Peurto Rico having an Age of Consent of 14, claiming that any man who would like to be with a 14 to 15 year old girl is a “predator” and that AOC 18 laws “promote gender equality”. I would just love to live in a country run by those guys.
I left a comment on that american renaissance page. Strange that conservatives can’t see the mess that paedohysteria is causing to society. Never known a society in history that basically forbid anything but formal interaction between adults and adolescents (and of course men are now sensibly refusing to participate even in formal interractions such as teaching). There are some conservatives in the UK now who can see it, for example Boris Johnson the mayor of London has spoken out several times, but basically their hands are tied by others in their party, the mob vote, feminist lobby groups, international pressure etc etc
We’re the first civilisation in history to actively teach young people to hate and fear adults, instead of to respect us and to see us as potential role models (at least male adults).
Thank you, I too have left a comment there, hopefully between the 2 of us we have planted some seeds of knowledge there and some of them will start to question the memes that have been pushed on them.
I hope you don’t mind the lengthy quotations, AF. I think that the attempt to exculpate women of their own sexual behaviour and proclivities is striking. Also, since you’ve seen the porn industry from the inside you can probably counter some of the charges made against it.
AF, I was most struck by the comments of Xanadu (a woman). Women you see, pace Xanadu, are in porn only because they’re drugged and beaten, etc. etc. It is to laugh. Since you’re familiar with the porn business, how about a counter testimony, AF?
As for the interracial question; this indirectly shows female affinity for IR sex. Women today can, and often do, sue for divorce at the drop of a hat. Would any husband in his right mind suggest to his wife that she sleep with a black if it wasn’t wide spread practice,either married or otherwise? Why isn’t this Canadian gal outraged at the suggestion? Why isn’t she availing herself of the privilege to sue for divorce?
I don’t really have any insider knowledge of the porn business, I just ran a few affiliate websites a number of years back. I’d love to shoot porn but the paperwork and legal risks now are tremendous, especially considering it’s hardly profitable.
I don’t know much more than the average porn surfer, and I’ve never even met a porn actress, but anyone who watches porn can see that the actresses are more than willing. Look at the tens of thousands of amateur videos being uploaded every day that are killing the professional porn industry. Women don’t even need to be paid in order to enjoy starring in porn, let alone be drugged or beaten by gangsters.
Any porn producer looking for women to star in some hardcore interracial just needs to purchase a sex contact magazine and take his pick from the dozens of ads featuring white women begging to suck black dick for free (and many or most of them actually asking to be ‘abused’ by black men).
As for the idea that the porn industry is run by mafia types, if that was the case anti-porn feminists would need 24 hour police protection for trying to close it down.
This type of bizarre behavior (husband asking his wife to have sex with a black man…or any man) is not widespread at all in Canada, this couple must be complete weirdos. The Fishman Study that I mentioned above suggests that females are less keen on interracial relationships than men, maybe the women who do porn are keen on interracial sex but women who do porn are not necessarily representative of females in general.
“As for the idea that the porn industry is run by mafia types, if that was the case anti-porn feminists would need 24 hour police protection for trying to close it down.”
Great point. I never thought of that
@RR Likewise with the supposed sex trafficking industry which feminists claim is a $7 billion money making racket for gangsters. It’s estimated that the drug trade running through Mexico is worth a similar amount. Just look at what the gangsters there who control the trade are willing to do to each other and to law enforcement officials to maintain their control and the income they obtain from it. Yet a relative handful of feminists can openly campaign not just for the ending of sex trafficking, but effectively the criminilization of prostitution itself. These feminists should each need a private army to protect them from the fury of the gangsters. They don’t, because there is no sex trafficking industry, and certainly not one worth billions of dollars.
lol @ this repeated stuff about “sex contact magazines” …do you know of ANY remotely sane or attractive girl who has ever posted an sex ad anywhere? Why would a girl do that when they can just find it every day on the street, at the gym, in a bar, club, etc.? Also, who in 2010 posts sex ads in magazines, it’s all on the internet now. Oh I forgot. There ARE internet sites that document what women are looking for in sexual partners but for one reason or another those sites are “wrong” and so we must look at “sex contact magazines” and PORN to find out about the desires of women….riiiight…
Most men who enjoy black man-white woman porn are probably latent homosexuals by the way.
@Robert : sex contact magazines/ sex contact sites, I think most readers would understand it as the same thing.
Because they want to have sex with somebody they are sure only wants sex in return.
By the way, I made this point about the sex contact magazine to address the argument that only women who are drugged or beaten would be willing to star in porn, and in particular Jewish porn. Women who appear in porn, who you appear to accept might be a similar kind to those who posts advertisements in online sex magazines.
Yea right, sex contact sites tell us nothing about which men women find most sexually attractive, but dating sites full of washed up 40 year olds desperate to settle down and have children with somebody solvent and faithful before it’s too late do.
Again, why exactly are you worried about interracial sex when you hold at the same time that it’s just an illusion dreamt up by Jews?
“Because they want to have sex with somebody they are sure only wants sex in return.”
– it should be clear there ARE girls who only want sex, but if you actually believe girls are concerned that it is the guy who will want something more when they meet him in a club or bar, and because of this go to the extent of meeting guys from anonymous sites… okaaayy
that you say this, and in general that you believe any remotely attractive or even sane girl would post in sex contact sites or magazines makes me think you understand nothing about women or female psychology…sorry this is just too ridiculous to continue…oh and you’ve also used “evidence from interracial PORN” more than once to back up your argument…
PS care to mention any of these sex contact sites? craigslist is very popular…but you know what…girls DO NOT POST there! you might get the occasional 40 yr old fattie looking for a dinner date…but 90% those ads are bots, scams, ads for porn sites, etc.; check it out if you don’t believe me …only gays use online sex contact sites…this is beyond ridiculous…
PPS why do I care? because you said something wrong and we got into this argument and because I don’t want to let you psychologically harm any of your white male readers with this Jew-created propaganda…they are already under attack every day. You’ve admitted to being a pornographer, aspiring pornographer, or formerly associated with this “industry” no? Don’t you think that this experience or aspiration might uhhh SKEW your opinions?
PPPS OKCupid is NOT for 40 yr old women, it’s full of girls in their 20s looking for bf’s and such; in the major urban centers there are a few attractive girls even who post there; by contrast there is NO woman who will outright post a sex ad or who will admit to looking for sex who is not either a prostitute or seriously deranged/deformed, and that you think there is makes you look clueless about women. Attractive girls, or even average girls, just don’t need to do that, it’s not the same as it is for guys; and they have enormous reluctance (about status, and such) to meet people online in the first place.
Insult me one more time Robert and you’re banned.
I don’t want to harm the psychology of other white men. The reason why I talk about the fact that so many white women clearly sexually objectify black men in the most anamalistic way possible is because white men (and black men) are berated every minute of the day, and increasingly locked up or criminilized in the thousands each day, for ‘sexually objectifying’ women.
Yep, it’s called no strings attached, and I fail to see why that is any more or less ridiculous than attractive girls posting in dating sites for the opposite reason – namely that they want somebody who DOESN’T just want sex.
And actually, those 20 year old attractive women on OK cupid are probably 90% bots, fake profiles, prostitutes. The reason why I referred to sex contact MAGAZINES is because I know that most online sex sites are fake. You WILL find genuine women on many FREE online sex sites, that is something evidenced by the number of scandals featuring female university professors, teachers etc who have been identified and made public on those sites. You will also find that there are thousands of genuine couples advertising on these sites.
What evidence from interracial porn? I was countering a point made on the site that RR linked to – that men only watch interracial porn because the government funds Jewish pornographers to tell them to. You’re not the only person on this thread Robert.
I don’t ‘admit’ to anything. I’d hardly fulfil the definition of a ‘pornographer’ from making about $200 from half-hearted affiliate adult dating sites, but I’d sure rather be labeled as that than an anti-semitic nazi.
This isn’t a white supremacist site, it’s an anti-feminist site. I’m not going to waste any more time arguing this with you.
Robert the OKCupid study is junk, people going to a large dating site like this would expect that it would be mostly comprised of whites so using the people who frequent it are not necessarily a good sample because non-whites who wish to date amongst their own kind would not likely go to OKCupid but to an ethnic dating website. Other problems with it are that we don’t know what countries are involved, if the data was normalized by income or if there are any differences in the quality of the messages sent by the senders or if the data was normalized by user or message volume. Also were there any pictures sent with the messages? Women may not be quite as visually oriented as men but looks still count for quite a bit, the absence of pictures attached to the messages also questions it’s usefulness IMHO. The Fishman Study (done by Columbia University) that I mentioned above gave very different results (most women prefered men of their own race, white men were top dogs with white women but not with anyone else). This study still might have problems (it was a speed-dating study) but those results certainly seem more realistic and in this study the participants met each other face to face.
Quite frankly I think touting the OKCupid study is what will harm white men because if too many of them believe the hype they may develop bloated egos around women and/or become too complacent and neglect to keep themselves in fighting shape for the sexual jungle. In particular if white men are interested in interracial dating they would be foolish to assume that non-white women prefer them over their own men. Non-white women (including east asians) prefer thier own men over whites just like white women strongly prefer white men over non-whites. Also do you realize that the OKCupid study is used to bash white males??? It has been used to paint white men as being men who “suck” and who are “stuck ups” (because they were the least likely to write back to anyone) and “racist”. All in all I do not think that this study is a good one to tout for people who care about the welfare of white males in the sexual jungle, rather it should be exposed for the piece of trash that it is.