PUA Explains What Girls Find Attractive in Guys

PUA and practical 'game' seems to me to boil down to how to project confidence when interacting with females. Anything much beyond that and the PUA is either up his own ass, trying to sell you something, or at best, telling you how to spend hours mastering a technique that might up your 1 in 50 success rate to 1 in 49.

My biggest problem with following the PUA lifestyle is squaring the requirement of confidence being crucial to making her gina tingle, with the avoidance of turning into a desensitised brute after repeated rejections. Posessing confidence might not be strictly identical to being a 'bad boy', but in order to maintain one's 'state' after multiple rejections when gaming, I can't see any other route but to become utterly disinterested in what a female thinks - in other words, just see her as another pussy that you are trying to get into.

This relates to another common theme on this blog - the Trauma Myth as a justification for draconian punishments for men who break statutory rape laws and other feminist sex rules. A man is committing a heinous act which deserves to be punished mercilessly if he has sex with a girl a day under the age of consent, because such a girl will be 'traumatised' for life as a result of being 'abused'. In particular, this trauma is often said to entail that the abuse victim will find it 'difficult to maintain relationships' in the future.

Fair enough, if this is an inevitable or even likely consequence of such crimes, then the man does indeed deserve to be punished harshly. But something I've never understood is what this supposed subsequent inability to maintain relationships means. For a man has to take the initiative in virtually every stage of a relationship and the pursuit of the opposite sex. And his likelihood of success in securing and maintaining any kind of sexual relationship, as PUAs tell us, is mostly down to confidence. The woman essentially just has to decide whether or not to open her legs, sleep with him, live with him, stick with him etc. In other words, in terms of being able to maintain relationships and have a successful love life, the psychology of a man is far more fragile and essential than that of a woman or a girl.

If the Trauma Myth was true, and the real basis of feminst sex laws, then in a fair world, when a female sadistically rejects an approach from a male, where the level of rejection far exceeds that which is required to express disinterest and 'NO', and whose apparent purpose is to harm the man's self-confidence and ability to approach women in future, then she should be guilty of a crime as serious as a sexual assault or sex with a minor. She is deliberately harming a man's ability to succeed with other women. There is little ambiguity about that malicious intention, whereas when a man sexually assaults a woman, or has sex with an underage girl, the intention is rarely to actually harm the female, but simply to obtain illicit sexual satisfaction. Furthermore, in most cases of these inflated feminist definitions of abuse, the resulting 'harm', especially the 'inability to have relationships', is largely speculative and unproven (aside from femi junk science), and probably a result of being labelled and victimised by the abuse industry if it does occur.

As relates to practical PUA advice for the beginner (as I am, after a long time away from 'game'), the important lesson is to go slowly and progress at your own level, building confidence gradually and realistically. A popular technique is to begin by asking women for the time, or for directions, before slowly graduating to making real approaches.  If you're really short of self-confidence, it would probably be better to avoid approaching women in the street altogether until you have sorted out your underlying confidence issues.  The possibility of encountering a sadistic bitch who will take pleasure in 'scarring you' is just too great (the possibility of this is even higher if you make the mistake when a sensitive beginner of approaching girls in pairs or in groups).

http://www.goodlookingloser.com/2012/09/22/guys-that-should-not-start-approaching-women/

http://jimmyjambone.com/2012/12/15/i-met-an-amazing-london-girl-i-am-getting-married/

12 thoughts on “PUA Explains What Girls Find Attractive in Guys

  1. Alan Vaughn

    If the Trauma Myth was true, and the real basis of feminst sex laws, then in a fair world, when a female sadistically rejects an approach from a male, where the level of rejection far exceeds that which is required to express disinterest and ‘NO’, and whose apparent purpose is to harm the man’s self-confidence and ability to approach women in future, then she should be guilty of a crime as serious as a sexual assault or sex with a minor....

    That's a great post and certainly a much more plausible and logical argument for female 'abuse' of men than AVfm and other supporting femRA / mRA advocates of the woman rapist / feminist abuse industry endorsement they're all demanding, because unlike their insistence that: men are scared of vaginas or of BBW (big, bad women) or of 'Cougars', these are REAL FEARS, that most men DO actually have to live with and of course, if such fears ever materialize: the experience really IS somewhat traumatic.
    Although once again I have to draw the line there. The trauma is hardly going to be a life-altering or long-lasting, debilitating experience, at least not for most men. We are MEN, not girls - that's life.

    On the other hand: it would be great if those nasty cows you refer to who derive some sort of sadistic gratification from seeing some unfortunate, shy individual, have his confidence shot to pieces: charged with some sort of offence. PROVIDING it isn't treated by or, connected in any way whatsoever with 'Councillors', Charlatans Psychologists, 'therapists'; or anything linked in any way at all with the feminist abuse industry...

  2. Jack

    Definition of a "sex-tourism" destination: a place where any woman who turns a man down does so without harming his self-image.

  3. Eric

    Alan & Antifeminist:
    The quote Alan described is just about typical behavior for American women, although they all deny that this ever happens. One reason I oppose PUAs is because they are setting themselves up for this very kind of treatment.

    American women have actually been known to engage in sex with men, and then afterwards laugh at how much they supposedly sucked in bed; how inferior they were to other men they've had &c.

    Really the best way for any Anglo-American male to gain sexual confidence is to avoid the Anglobitch like the plague and get to know some real women from other cultures. Anglo-American women are almost like a Third Gender---nothing feminine about them at all.

  4. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Anyone else notice the wistful look he gives at the young hotties (possibly jailbait) at the end?

    http://youtu.be/RHuis-Cj-no?t=1m46s

    The hardest thing about being a successful PUA must be the knowledge that some of the best looking girls are out of bounds, at least if you are an American or Brit.

  5. Eric

    If you haven't checked it out yet, Human-Stupidity has a nice article called "The Obedient Wives Club". It's about some women in Malaysia who are doing what the femRAs should be doing here!

    Forget PUA, just meet some REAL women! LOL

  6. Alan Vaughn

    "Not bad for a PUA : http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/the-pedophile-libel/

    Can’t imagine an article like that appearing on AVfM anytime soon."

    No, I can't see that ever being allowed on a mangina's feminist support site such as AVfm.

    However the only part I had a problem with...

    Well, this armed outpost of blogdom is here to set the record straight. To expose the lords of lies for what they are, to grind their shitfuck faces in their falsehoods, and to taste the unfathomable sadness of their bitter tears.

    What's he talking about? He writes as though he's the only one whose noticed or is aware of the 'phenomenum'. We've been saying that here and a whole lot more, for YEARS!

    The MORE, THE MERRIER...
    LOL!

  7. theantifeminist

    Post author

    What’s he talking about? He writes as though he’s the only one whose noticed or is aware of the ‘phenomenum’. We’ve been saying that here and a whole lot more, for YEARS!

    True, but that was actually quite a brave post from Roissy, given that he'd already been doxxxed and reported to the FBI by feminist psychopaths Lady Raine and Denise Romano - the same psychos who were trying to get PUAs arrested for rape.

    Roissy's is also a much bigger site than mine, or for that matter, any men's rights site. In fact, that article, I would assume, is probably the most read anti-paedohysteria/statutory rape law article in existance.

  8. Alan Vaughn

    In fact, that article, I would assume, is probably the most read anti-paedohysteria/statutory rape law article in existance.

    Great! Hence my "The MORE, THE MERRIER…" remark.
    Now if only a site such as AVfM DID publish a post even half as courageous in its denouncement of paedohysteria, I'd happily eat all of my words, I've uttered against the site. And that's a LOT of words too!

  9. Alan Vaughn

    @theantifeminist
    About that post on paedohysteria of Roissy's: the story he referred to was about 51 year old (at the time, in 2011), Doug Hutchinson and his 16 year old wife: Courtney Stodden.

    Is this the same couple that the 'runner-up' for our Paedocrite of the Year - 2012 award: Carolina Courtland referred to as something like this: 'I cannot help noticing a child trying to look like an adult, while the man she's with is trying not to look like a pedophile'?

    I tried to find the answers myself, but rather mysteriously: all the links from that story here which once linked to Carolina's (envy riddled) summary of the infamous couple are now dead: I.e. '404 - page not found'.

    Maybe Carolina was worried about our insistence that she would at least be sailing very close to the wind as far as possibly flouting certain child pornography laws were concerned, thus wisely decided to take it all offline?

  10. Hey man, good call and comparison between male harassment and female feminist "harassment".

    Punishing women who treat men really bad will probably never happen though - that kind of law will never be let through in this feminazi oh-so-equal society.

    By the way, a fun little fact:
    In the European parliament, they actually discussed to make a law that forces a certain amount of women into Boards:
    http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-1205_en.htm

    "aim of attaining a 40% objective of the under-represented sex in non-executive board-member positions in publicly listed companies"

    This is crazy. Men and women should not be ALIKE, they should be EQUAL but why dont people accept that the genders have different desires. More men just want to be leaders. Thats fucking nature.

    Anyways I checked out your site, good stuff (:
    - Thomas

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>