Please E-mail PornHarms.com over ‘Porn on a Plane’ and their Demonisation of Male Sexuality

This is my e-mail to grassroots@pornharms.com over the video  - 'Man watched violent, child-themed porn on Delta flight - NO ONE CARED', which was brilliantly and scathingly torn apart by the Amazing Atheist.  Please e-mail her (Dawn Hawkins) your own thoughts about her video, then paste your e-mail in a comment underneath this article.

Hi,

I watched your YouTube video this morning, entitled 'Man watched violent, child-themed porn on Delta flight - NO ONE CARED!'

You said that you wanted viewers to contact you with their thoughts...so here I am.

At first I was sickened by your racist, misandristic video, but then I collected myself and realised that, really, I ought to just pity you.  I don't mean to be cruel - but you're obviously tormented by your bitterness at being plain and unattractive.  You really need some professional help in order to overcome your transparent sexual jealousy of younger women, and in particular, of Asian females.

You appear to be simply rationalising your own sexual insecurities in order to demonise and criminalise men, and in order to limit the sexual power of females younger and better looking than yourself.  Please stop it - you're hurting men, and you are restricting the freedoms of thousands of young women and girls around the world.  Seek help, and you might become a better person, able to live with yourself, instead of hating yourself and the world around you.

Perhaps you should take a lesson from your admission that 'NO ONE CARED'.  That's right - nobody cares except bitter, unattractive, and aging women, who think they can rig the free sexual market in their own favour by shaming men and introducing law after law that criminilises male sexuality or restricts people's freedoms. In my opinion, this is the equivalent of rape - on a massive scale. Your only hope of success in this is by your manipulative out of sight lobbying of governments, something that tramples upon democracy, the principle of rational and open debate, and the rights to freedom of expression and sexual self-determination for thousands or millions of people around the world.

Please...you're degrading yourself and other women like you.  Once again, I urge you to accept your limitations and to seek professional counselling.

Here are some links that you may find helpful :

http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/BIB/DIAM/effects_pornography.htm#conclusions (leading independent study concludes that porn is harmless)

http://www.thetherapylounge.com/hypnotherapy/overcome-jealousy  (psychotherapy for women suffering from excessive sexual jealousy)

http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2010/jun2010_Immortal-Stem-Cells-for-Anti-Aging-Therapies_01.htm (in a couple of decades you might be able to look 18 years old again!)

http://timeguide.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/avatar-0-0/ (Leading futurologist claims that, in a couple of decades, people will be having sex through avatars, or wearing lenses that allow them to alter the look of their lover.  Even without stem cell rejuvenation or surgery, you will be able to look like a beautiful 18 year old Asian girl!  The laws that you are trying to introduce now are very short-sighted.  You are a loser in the free sexual market today, but in 20 years time there will be no winners or losers, and you won't have any reason to be sexually jealous or bitter anymore.  Please seek therapy, and try to take a longer term view of your sex life.)

 Yours sincerely

Arthur Schopenbecq

13 thoughts on “Please E-mail PornHarms.com over ‘Porn on a Plane’ and their Demonisation of Male Sexuality

  1. house always wins

    The feminist endgame here is a Saudi/Iranian style situation where the possession of ANY kind of porn gets you locked up (or worse).

    Hell, Max Hardcore was jailed in the states for making porn with legal adults but playacting that they were underage.

    Feminist Theocracy is closer than you think…

  2. Alan Vaughn

    @theantifeminist

    See below my e-mail to Dawn Hawkins, sorry it ended up a bit longer than you (or me) would have liked…

    Dear Ms Dawn Hawkins,

    My very attractive and YOUNG looking Asian wife and I watched your disgusting misandrous effort to victimize a perfectly LAW ABIDING Delta Airlines passenger, which apparently back-fired on you, when you were: a) treated with indifference by an airline flight attendant, b) told you were making a fool of yourself by a middle aged WOMAN (who you clearly expected SHOULD have endorsed your verbal assault on that man who was just sitting in his seat minding his own business), then c) ignored by an airport police officer…

    Still not convinced that YOU might be wrong and even making a complete fool of yourself, you then had to totally destroy your own reputation and the further enhance the notion held by practically every reasonable adult in the Western World, that you and your NONSENSE organization are just a bunch of frustrated, jealous, sex-deprived losers who because of their psychotic misandry want to destroy every sexually normative man on te planet!

    Well I’ll tell you something Dawn: my wife who is sexy and loves sex and loves to turn me on by wearing the shortest skirts the law will allow and high-heels, said that you are just a nosy jealous IDIOT. She even asked what makes her (YOU Dawn) think that she can just look over someones shoulder and examine what he’s looking at on his computer? She was outraged at your total disregard for the man’s right to privacy and just couldn’t believe that ANYONE would then have the gall to make condescending and such disrespectful comments to him.

    She even said that if that man had turned around and slapped your UGLY face, it would have been acceptable under the circumstances. And my wife abhors violence and has warned ME that if I ever even threatened her I would never see her again!

    You say that MEN who look at pornography are sick…

    The only people in this world that are sick are you misandrous BIGOTS who go around the world inventing DRACONIAN and PSYCHOTIC laws that are designed ONLY to destroy innocent, law-abiding, sexually NORMAL MALES. NOT just adults either, you now have a large trophie cabinet full of several hundred little BOYS! Criminalized for NOTHING! Didn’t you ‘play doctor when you were little’? I guess not, maybe that’s why you DESPISE men and decided to become a feminist.

    The Feminist Holocaust, (not unlike the holocaust started by Mr Adolf Hitler where his target was Jews or other ‘inferior races’, but where your ‘offender’ is the sexually normal male), is going to back-fire on you one day, in the same way your RIDICULOUS You-Tube video has now: It will eventually bring down the FemiNAZI movement, when all the women and children (not the men who are all locked up in prisons as ‘sickos’, ‘perverts’ and Paedophiles) but their loved ones…

    The ones you claim to be ‘protecting’: women and children don’t like it when their husbands / fathers are removed from their lives and ostracized for eternity, but they like it even less when they have to suffer the hatred, ridicule and even fear for their lives when the lynch-mobs come to attack them; thanks to your public ‘child-sex offender registries’… You are supposed to be protecting children, but your psychotic campaign and consequent BARBARIC laws are doing everything but that. These families will one day soon, join forces and soon: a huge revolt against feminism will ensue and win!
    Your MANGINA puppets will not help you then, they are gutless wimps who would not be capable of fending off even a 10 year old girl: The draconian laws they reluctantly passed over the years are proof of that – too SCARED even to argue with intimidating lesbian whores!

    When are you brainless, DERANGED whores going to wake up to yourselves?

    The paedophile hysteria you have have polluted the western world with is destroying countless THOUSANDS of families and millions of GOOD MEN.

    Finally Dawn Slutbrain Hawkins: You cannot change nature by enacting mindless, DRACONIAN laws: It is NORMAL, NATURAL and INSTINCTIVE for men to be attracted to nubile, fertile and beautiful young girls. It is NOT the fault of the men you have stigmatized and left to be RAPED by violent criminals in prisons. If it’s anyone’s fault it is God’s. PUNISH HIM, not good men, women and little children…

    If you have any sort of compassion or conscience whatsoever, you should now go somewhere and kill yourself and leave a copy of this letter for your feminNAZI comrades to read…

    Get Fucked,
    Alan Vaughn

  3. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Thanks so much for doing your bit there Alan – some excellent points! I don’t know how many e-mails she is recieving, or if she is even reading them, but I’m sure from just the e-mail subject titles she can guess that men are waking up and are getting fucking angry. The last time I checked, her YouTube video had something like 15,000 downvotes and just 200 upvotes.

    Yet she and her group will still probably get a hearing from politicians.

  4. Alan Vaughn

    @theantifeminist,
    Thanks for doing your bit there too.
    They won’t be able to log my ip either, I sent if from a yahoo.com e-mail from a web browser – they’ll only have the yahoo mail server ip, unless of course they actually go to the trouble of contacting yahoo and demanding to see the server logs, where it will show that I logged into my Yahoo mail acct, via my local ISP assigned ip. They can then easily trace that back to my real name and location. Somehow I don’t think they’d bother… ?
    I was beginning to think until now (after reading your comments above and on the other thread relating to the same topic) that this video might have just been a practical joke, designed to (very effectively) ‘taunt’ or ridicule this ‘MIM’ Sexual Trade Union department.
    However, judging by that post from ‘Anti-feminist aspirant’, it appears that it is a genuine ‘MIM approved media release’.
    I only thought it was a joke because it was just TOO RIDICULOUS. I thought, surely nobody, not even a devout STU leader could be that arrogant, yet at the same time: be so naive…

  5. theantifeminist

    Post author

    I don’t think you (or anyone else) has anything to worry about. So long as your e-mail isn’t threatening (and yours wasn’t), you have simply taken up their stated offer of giving your opinion on their video that slanders all men who like Asian porn as paedophiles and perverts.

    I don’t know wtf they are on about with their ‘illegal access’ to their site thing!!!

  6. Alan Vaughn

    theantifeminist

    I don’t know wtf they are on about with their ‘illegal access’ to their site thing!!!

    Nor do I..? Surely if they believe in what they’re preaching, they’d want us all there in droves so they can convert us into manginas, then use us to betray all our dissident colleagues (turn them in to the thought police) or something?

    But then again, remember what I wrote earlier about my suspecting that it was only a practical joke? Maybe I was on the right track and some mischevious PRO-porn, tech-savvy gentlemen ‘back-door’ entered their domain server and wreaked havoc…
    Let’s hope so!

  7. inclinedreader

    Here are some links that you may find helpful :

    The problem is that these morality “watchdogs” don’t CARE about science. They simply don’t give a damn if respectable peer-reviewed psychiatric studies disprove them beyond a shadow of a doubt over and over again. It’s like trying to convince somebody and showing them a mountain of evidence that the earth revolves around the sun and that the sun is merely a tiny insignificant star in the Milky Way… and they still tell you “yeah well, I still believe the earth is flat and the sun goes around it”.

    Entities like Morality in Media stem from the ignorant closed-minded bible-thumping microcosm that is American Evangelicals. Independent science and research are their kryptonite, because the two have an almost natural tendency to dismantle and chip away at all the (biblical) truisms and fabrications which Evangelicals hold so dear. MiM has even been complaining for years that the “liberal” academic community and the U.S. government don’t fund any research to prove the mortal ills that pornography supposedly brings about. All the science that is out there overwhelmingly disproves their stance, but rather than accept that, they are complaining that there is no money to fund the concoction of (junk) science to the contrary.

    Read more here:

    http://sexualintelligence.wordpress.com/2011/09/04/morality-in-media-admits-they-lack-facts-so-they-lie-about-porn/

    Morality in Media Admits They Lack Facts, So They Lie About Porn

    Of course there is no evidence linking adult porn with either of those things, but MiM has never let facts stand in the way of their Big Lie. In their latest press release, they admit that they have no evidence of this connection—and, incredibly, they demand that the government find one: “No researcher has yet published a study that uses empirical science to validate the [alleged] link between adult and child pornography…the U.S. Department of Justice doles out hundreds of millions of dollars for crime research, ostensibly to discover ways to make us safer. The link between adult and child pornography should now be a top target of research.”

  8. Alan Vaughn

    “No researcher has yet published a study that uses empirical science to validate the [alleged] link between adult and child pornography…the U.S. Department of Justice doles out hundreds of millions of dollars for crime research, ostensibly to discover ways to make us safer. The link between adult and child pornography should now be a top target of research.”

    Perhaps the US Department of Justice consider such funding is unnecessary because thanks to the current intense wave of paedo-hysteria which has affected almost everyone in the West, their ideolgies are believed by most of the general poulation (like stupid sheep being led to slaughter) anyway.
    They just take the word of the government (and the STU ideologies influencing them), that porn and child-porn is ‘dangerous’ and causes family breakdowns etc. etc…
    That’s why most people think it is quite right, fair and just to lock a man up for decades of sodomy and worse in prison for the ‘despicable crime’ (thought crime) of looking at pictures of 17 year old ‘children’ dressed in bikinis…

  9. theantifeminist

    Post author

    If there is a link between adult and (real) child porn it’s probably due to the insane feminist definitions of children and child porn – who knows how many real paedophiles and real child porn addicts their laws have created by pretending that fully grown 17 year old girls are children and that the men who admit to finding them attractive are paedophiles?

    *EDIT : it’s interesting that the commentators on YouTube to TAA’s video and those of Morality in Media (left by his supporters) are keen to stress the distinction between ‘adult’ and ‘child’ porn. But in most of the world, it wouldn’t matter if those Asian girls were 14 or 18, so long as they looked under 18 to feminist/femiservative hags like Dawn Hawkins. If she had created such a scene on a plane in Europe or Australia or Canada, there’s no doubt that the guy would have been arrested and his laptop checked thoroughly – and if those Asian girls did look ‘young’ then he’d be fucked.

    The other slightly disturbing thought is, however much encouraging it is the support that the Amazing Atheist is getting, I have a feeling that if and when these femi nutjobs succeed in getting ALL porn made illegal, most of those same commentators will be screaming at each other for being pornographers/woman exploiters etc if any of them admit to thinking that porn might not be completely evil. They don’t seem to be aware that the present ridiculous laws defining child porn and paedophilia were made by exactly the same nutjobs like Dawn Hawkins, and for exactly the same selfish sexual reasons.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>